►
From YouTube: November 17, 2021 City Administration Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
We
are
calling
to
order
our
november
city
administration
committee
meeting
the
penultimate
city
administration
committee
meeting
that
I
will
be
chairing
not
that
we're
all
keeping
track
or
counting
down,
but
second
to
last.
Is
there
any
adjustments
that
anyone
needs
to
make
to
the
agenda
anything
we
need
to
talk
about.
I
don't
have
any
changes.
Does
anybody
else
nope
all
right?
We
have
very
short
but
lovely
minutes
from
our
short
but
lovely
october,
ca
meeting
that
we
had
in
the
middle
of
the
budget
process.
C
C
C
All
right,
so
we
can
move
right
in
to
our
voting
items.
For
this
evening
we
have
a
few
items
on
consent.
Does
someone
want
to
move
the
consent
agenda
items?
Graham?
Is
there
a
second
rob?
Thank
you.
All.
Those
in
favor
of
our
consent
agenda
looks
unanimous
great.
This
is
going
to
be
an
excellent
penultimate
meeting.
So
we're
on
to
our
first
voting
item,
and
I
will
ask
if
there's
anyone
that
wants
to
move
3.1.
E
E
And
whereas
once
restaurants
were
permitted
to
reopen
new
york,
state
guidelines
required
them
to
significantly
limit
their
dining
capacity
and
whereas
in
may
of
2020,
the
city
was
approached
by
a
group
of
restaurant
owners
on
aurora
street.
That
requested
that
the
city
consider
closing
the
100
block
of
north
aurora
streets
to
allow
for
expanded
outdoor
seating
areas.
That
would
offset
the
reduced
capacity
requirements.
E
And
whereas
the
city
responded
by
temporarily
closing
the
100
block
of
north
aurora
street
to
vehicular
traffic
to
allow
for
the
expansion
of
the
outdoor
dining
area
for
the
remainder
of
the
2020
outdoor
dining
season.
And
whereas
this
temporarily
temporary
pedestrian
only
block
proved
to
be
popular
for
the
community
and
responded
to
the
popularity
of
the
streetery
and
response
to
the
popularity
of
the
streetery.
E
000
to
fund
a
study
of
potential
seasonal
closure
closures
of
the
100
block
of
north
aurora
street
to
vehicular
traffic
and
the
recommendation
of
traffic
parking
and
voting
mitigations,
and
be
it
further
resolve
that
the
common
council
does
hereby
authorize
the
mayor
to
enter
into
a
contract
with
a
consultant
to
complete
this
study
and
be
it
further
resolved
that
the
fund
funds
necessary
to
fund
said
study
shall
be
derived
from
the
issuance
of
serial
bonds.
And
I
so
move.
G
Well,
I
mean
I
think
most
of
it
was
in
the
resolution,
but
basically
the
street
array
was
in
response
to
the
pandemic.
We
didn't
study
it
beforehand.
We
didn't
evaluate
it.
We
were
responding
to
try
and
help
the
restaurants
and
the
businesses
on
that
road,
but
now
because
of
its
popularity
and
the
idea
that
we
might
continue
doing
it
because
it
it
really
was
widely
used
by
the
community.
We
feel
like
it's
important
to
actually
take
a
look
at
how
to
do
it.
G
The
right
way
to
make
sure
we
evaluate
all
the
impacts
and
see
if
there
are
any
changes
we
need
to
make
as
far
as
traffic
and
parking
and
loading
and
any
safety
mitigations
that
we
need
to
put
into
place,
and
so
that's
what
this
study
would
be
for.
F
Definitely
thanks
so
much
jen
for
the
background
info
about
why
we
are
requesting
to
do
this
study.
We
had
a
meeting
with
the
mayor
a
couple
weeks
ago.
I
guess
it
was
pretty
recently
to
discuss
the
streetery
and
the
many
issues
that
we
have
with
the
streetery.
The
street
area
is,
on
one
hand,
a
really
wonderful
thing
for
the
community.
F
It
really
helps
the
businesses
people
enjoy
it
and,
on
the
other
hand,
there
are
concerns
with
numerous
concerns.
We
get
a
lot
of
phone
calls
from
people
about
the
traffic
issues
from
having
that
block
closed
about
the
parking
issues
in
that
area,
especially
about
loading
issues,
since
both
sides
of
the
100
block
of
aurora
street,
you
know
used
to
be
and
are
back
to
being
really
like
a
loading
zone.
F
So,
instead
of
oh
and
also
of
course,
I
shouldn't
forget
the
safety
concerns
of
having
people
walking
in
the
street
at
the
bottom,
essentially
of
the
aurora
street
hill.
F
F
So
the
project
would
have
six
parts
existing
conditions,
evaluations
having
to
do
with
speeds,
traffic
flows,
including
trucks,
parking
and
loading
activities.
Mapping.
F
We
would
do
a
they're
calling
pilot
evaluation
plan,
which
would
include
the
temporary
design
features
like
potentially
truck
speed,
attenuator
crash
attenuator,
I
mean
something
that
would
be
capable
of
stopping
an
errant
vehicle
coming
down.
The
hill
from
aurora
street
it
would
have
oh
yeah
layout
is
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
different
information
here.
F
One
one
of
the
tasks
would
be
a
loading
and
parking
impact,
evaluation,
development
of
alternative
loading
zones,
evaluation
of
the
current
loading
activity
and
the
impacts
of
this
reedery
traffic
diversion
analysis
there.
It's
the
explanation
is
small
network
model,
approximately
six
intersections
and
three
alternatives
to
the
traffic
diversions
and
then
conceptual
design,
including
truck
stopping
scheme.
F
So
these
six-
I
guess
tasks
you
could
say,
would
be
part
of
this
very
accelerated
study
that
we
would
be
asking
the
consultant
to
do
to
try
to
get
the
streeters
set
up
much
better
for
the
coming
year
and
we
would
have
the
option
in
the
future
if
we
wanted
to
make
this
readery
an
extension
of
the
commons,
as
some
people
have
discussed,
meaning
raise
the
streetery
up
to
sidewalk
level
and
have
it
be
closed
permanently.
F
If
we
don't
wish
to
do
that-
and
we
wish
to
do
this
readery
on
a
not
temporary
basis,
but
in
a
way
such
that
the
street
could
be
opened
and
closed
during
different
times
of
the
day
different
days
of
the
week,
etc.
F
We
have
the
ability
to
continue
this
project
and
and
go
in
that
direction
as
well,
but
the
initial
120
000
is
for
six
tasks
to
get
us
to
a
point
where
we
would
be
able
to
operate
the
streetery
much
better
than
we
have
been.
Ideally,
it
is
also
possible
that
this
work
will
be
done
and
the
conclusion
will
be
that
some
of
the
issues
we're
having
with
the
shrederie
are
going
to
be
difficult
to
fix.
F
C
D
Thanks
deb
thanks,
jennifer
ander
and
so
yeah
I
mean
I,
I
think
we
definitely.
I
was
down
there
a
few
times
and
it's
obvious
that
we
put
this
together
in
a
hurry,
and
you
know
I
mean,
I
think,
obviously
getting
a
better
sense
of
the
challenges
of
of
making
it
more.
I
guess
appealing
but
also
safer,
so
I
guess
you
know
I
mean
I
want
to
be
clear
about
what
the
consultants
are
going
to
be
doing.
Are
they
actually
going
to
be
coming
up
with
any
recommendation?
D
You
said
they
may
say:
look
this
is
going
to
be
expensive.
I
guess
I'm
concerned
that
they'll
just
give
us
the
information
and
then
we'll
be
saying.
Well,
what's
the
next
step,
as
you
said,
I
mean
if
they're
making
recommendations
it's
likely
to
to
be
expensive
in
terms
of
implementing
some
of
the
recommendations.
So
are
they
going
to
be
making
specific
recommendations?
D
That's
my
first
question
and
then
secondly,
given
that
this
obviously
is
going
to
have
an
impact
and
hopefully
a
benefit
for
the
business
community,
particularly
on
aurora
street,
have
we
approached
the
dia
with
any
idea
about
probably
contributing
some
funds?
To
this
I
mean
120
000,
it's
a
fairly
significant
price
tag
for
the
consulting
project,
so
those
are
the
two
questions
I
had
right
now.
F
F
How
signals
will
be
adjusted
which
we
would
do
or
have
the
state
do,
depending
on
who
owns
the
signal,
specific
products
that
we
could
purchase
as
far
as
crash
attenuators,
and
things
like
that,
so
we
would
be
getting.
F
We
would
be
getting
very
detailed,
a
very
detailed
proposal
of
what
needs
to
be
done.
We
would
have
a
very
detailed
plan.
We
would
just
have
to
do
it,
some
of
it.
We
would
do
with
in-house
crews
moving
signage
and
things
like
that.
We
do
very
easily
and
quickly
other
things.
We
would
need
to
to
have
a
contractor.
Do
like
probably
install
crash
attenuator
or
something
like
that,
but
yeah
it
will
be
a
very
detailed
design.
It
won't
be
a
plan
where
we
will
ask.
F
What's
next,
we
will
get
the
plan
and
then
we
will
implement
it
as
quickly
as
possible.
The
second
question
about
dia.
They
were
present
at
our
meeting
where
we
discussed
this
readery
the
issues
with
the
streetery.
What
the
kind
of
things
we
would
have
to
fix
before
we
would
do
the
streetery
again,
and
that
is
that
suggestion
of
them
contributing
was
not
brought
up.
F
I
don't
know
personally
how
that
how
that
would
work,
and
this
was
also
recently
that
we
just
kind
of
had
to
start
running
with
this
idea
of
a
study.
I
don't
know
jennifer,
do
you
have
any
experience.
G
No,
I
mean
we
haven't
discussed
approaching
dia
for
cost
sharing,
but
you
know
I
don't
think
we
would
be
moving
forward
if
it
was
only
for
the
businesses
on
aurora
street.
I
mean
part
of
the
reason
that
we
thought
it's
worth
moving
forward
is
because
it
was
so
widely
used
throughout
the
whole
community
and
that
we
had
such
high
levels
of
numbers
of
people
down
there.
So
I
I
mean
it
isn't
just
for
those
businesses.
I
think
we
should
be
clear
on
that.
We
can.
D
F
One
thing
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
real
quickly
is:
the
timeline
is
so
compressed.
Normally,
we
would
want
more
time
for
a
project
like
this,
but
we
spoke
to
the
consultant
and
they're
willing
to
work
with
us
on
a
very
compressed
timeline.
It's
already
pushing
it.
You
know
like
they
have
to
do
the
project
in
just
realistically
if
we
started
this
study.
F
If,
if
you
all
moved
this
to
common
council
and
common
council
approved
it
in
the
december
meeting,
we
would
be
able
to
let
them
know
in
december
and
get
them
going,
but
the
streetery
is
in
the
summer
right
like
it's,
not
that
long
from
now,
so
they
would
have
until
say
april,
perhaps
to
work,
and
then
we
would
have
a
month
or
two
to
implement
like
it's
a
very
compressed
timeline.
So
I,
if
we
want
to
do
a
study-
and
I
feel
like
a
study-
is
probably
necessary
to
do
the
streetery
better
this
coming
year.
F
F
H
Okay,
I
think
the
streetery
was
justified
during
the
the
covid
crisis
and
it
was
helpful-
and
I
know
the
mayor
is
very
excited
about
the
streetery.
H
I
will
say
that
among
my
constituents
on
south
hill,
it
is
generally
despised
because
it's
so
difficult
to
get
off
of
south
hill
and
particularly
turning
right
on
east
state
street
and
then
turning
left
and
then
turning
left
again
and
going
around
it.
It
was
a
nightmare
and
it
was
double
nightmare
by
the
fact
that
the
bridge
over
south
carolina
street
was
closed
this
summer,
and
I
don't
know
how
many
of
us
move
around
in
that
part
of
town,
but
it
was
really
really
problematic.
H
A
few
years
ago,
we
we
took
away
the
parking
on
aurora
street
and
extended
the
sidewalk
for
outdoor
dining.
That
seems
to
have
worked
well.
The
street
during
the
streetery
was
still
basically
empty,
except
for
some
ramps.
H
H
E
Yeah
thanks
everyone
yeah,
I
guess
I'll
start
by
saying
I
I
did
enjoy
the
streetery
periodically
and
I
think
it's
an
interesting
idea,
but
I'm
very
happy
that
we're
at
least
contemplating
a
study
before
we
move
forward
with
just
doing
this
again
to
george's
point.
You
know,
because
I
I
spend
my
day
time
hours,
often
up
on
south
hill
and
so
coming
off.
E
The
hill
can
be
a
real
challenge
and
it
was
exasperated
by
the
south
king
street
bridge
closing,
and
I
guess
one
of
my
questions
about
this
is
so
we
spent
two
seasons.
They
were
not
normal
seasons,
traffic
wise
as
a
result
of
that
and
the
previous
year,
just
people
not
driving
to
a
lot
of
us
not
driving
to
work,
and
things
like
that.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
can
learn
much
from
that,
but
we
get
gather
any
data
over
the
last
two
years
to
help
with
the
traffic
study.
E
Or
will
this
sort
of
be
a
fresh
look
at
it?
And-
and
I
guess
the
the
one
of
the
things
I
want
to
make
sure
is
not
to
lose
sight
of
what
george
highlighted,
which
is.
I
hope
that
the
public
input
piece
of
of
a
study
if
we
go
ahead
and
do
this
would
really
help
invite
people
who
were
the
ones
most
impacted
by
the
traffic
pattern.
E
So
I
hope
I
hope
that's
a
that
happens.
I'll
also
note,
I
think
it
was
kind
of
late
in
the
season
that
there
that
left
turn
arrow
on
east
straight
street
happened.
That
seemed
to
help.
A
F
Yes,
new
york,
state
d.o.t
just
changed
the
signal.
Sorry,
my
dog
is
sparking
downstairs
just
changed
the
signal
just
a
couple
weeks
ago,
I
think
maybe
a
few
weeks
ago,
but
very
recently,
which
is
something
we
had
been
requesting
since
many
months
ago.
So
that
should
help.
That
is,
I
think,
helping-
and
I
hear
you
both
about
the
traffic
issues
for
sure
and
that's
something
that
is
has
been
affecting
my
work,
because
I
get
all
the
calls,
not
all
the
calls.
I
know,
george.
F
E
Right
just
a
couple
of
other
quick
points,
so
this
clearly
I
get
the
compression
of
this
timeline.
It's
I
I
understand
it's
challenging.
It
is
a
hefty
price
tag
for
what
you
know
for
that
short
time
period,
but
I
get
that
it
takes
work.
E
So
one
of
the
things
I'm
curious
about
it
sounds
like
this
is
very
much
focused
on
aurora
street
and
I'm
wondering
if
there's,
if
you
have
any
expectations
about
what
we
can
learn
from
this,
about
the
possibility
of
closing
any
other
areas
or
streets
that
might
support
this
in
other
parts
of
the
city.
E
Or
is
this
only
really
going
to
be
helpful
for
aurora
street
and
not
much
more
and
then
one
last
question
might
be
for
steve,
which
is
to
george's
point?
Is
this
something
that
serial
bonds
is
really
the
only
way
to
or
best
way
to
do
this?
Or
could
this
have
been
tapped
into
like
an
arp
of
funding,
because
I
don't
remember
hearing
anything
about
this
during
the
budget
season.
F
Sure
so,
for
this
particular
project
it
would
be
focused
on
aurora
street
and
the
surrounding
area
specifically
to
alleviate
the
parking
loading
and
traffic
flow
and
safety
concerns
around
the
streetery
and.
F
If
we
well,
so
we
also
are
going
to
be
doing
the
transportation
plan
and
in
the
transportation
plan
we
will
be
focusing
on
we.
We
can
definitely
look
at
where
it
could
make
sense
to
do
more
kind
of
commons
type
street
closures.
If
people
would
like
to
extend
the
commons,
I
know
that
the
one
block
south
of
of
state
street
south
of
the
commons
is
a
location
that
or
west
of
the
commons
sorry
is
a
location
that
a
lot
of
people
mention
as
maybe
being
a
good
street
to
extend
the
commons.
B
Yeah,
as
far
as
the
question
regarding
the
project
it,
this
didn't
really
come
through
the
capital
review
process
during
the
budget
process.
So
I
you
know
we
really
didn't
discuss
it.
It's
not
really
eligible
for
arbor
funding.
B
If
we
were
to
borrow
for
this,
it
would
be
like
a
five-year
project,
and
if
you
know
improvements
came
out
of
it,
we
could
stretch
the
life
of
the
project
depending
on
what
those
improvements
are.
If
we
borrow
for
additional
funds
there,
but
the
borrowing
would
roughly
cost
us,
probably
something
like
seven
thousand
dollars
extra
for
for
this
particular
project.
B
I
guess
one
of
the
questions
I
would
have
for
jen
and
aaron
is
the
120
000
estimate
is
that
is
that
the
full
cost
of
the
is
that
the
full
cost
of
the
estimated
amount
for
the
project,
because
we
would
have
to
issue
funds
for
this,
and
there
is,
you
know,
roughly
some
more
financing
costs
that
would
have
to
be
added.
If,
if
the
120
000
is
what
you
expect
to
be
paying
for
the
consultant.
B
B
A
H
I
guess
one
thing
that
I
mean
this
is
kind
of
happening
all
all
at
once,
and
I
I
guess
I'd
need
some
some
data
about
how
much
the
streetery
is
improving
business
on
south
aurora
street.
We
we
already
have
outdoor
dining.
H
Is
it
in
fact
making
a
big
change
when
you
take
away
the
the
complications
of
the
covid,
and
is
it
worth
losing
all
that
loading
area
and
and
safety
issues,
fire
truck
access,
etc?
H
F
A
Yeah,
I
think
some
of
these
questions
that
george
asks,
which
are
good
ones,
are
probably
best
answered
by
a
study,
and
so
I
support
it.
I
am
steve,
did
you
just
say,
like
you
don't
think
it'll
be
arpa
eligible,
because
I
mean
this
happened
because.
G
B
A
Pandemic,
but
I
support
this,
I
think
I'll
grant
you
my
perspective
is
different
as
as
a
downtown
resident
who
rarely
drives,
but
I
used
it
frequently
and
I
love
passing
through
it
and
I
think,
but
I
said
you
know,
I
think
it's
important
to
figure
out
what
the
the
costs
were,
not
just
the
financial
costs
but
the
cost
to
getting
around
the
city
and
the
impact
of
other
residents
of
the
city,
and
I
would
like
to
know
that
so
yeah
thanks.
C
Yeah
I'll
chime
in
as
well,
I
mean
I'm
generally
in
favor
of
the
creative
idea,
but
what
I'm
wondering
is
it
sounds
like
we're
really
trying
to
just
sort
of
rush
this
through,
I
wonder,
is
first
of
all,
there's
no
reason
you
can't
set
up
the
shreddery
the
same
way
it's
set
up
now
next
summer.
C
I'm
assuming
you
know
if
we
felt
like
it
would
help
the
businesses
again,
and
maybe
this
just
needs
to
go
through
the
normal
capital
projects
process
and
get
mixed
in
with
all
of
the
other
things
that
we
need
to
figure
out.
If
we
spend
money
on
and
it
might
be
easier
to
get
a
better
sense
of
what
would
a
total
project
cost
be
that
would
include
you
know,
you
know,
maybe
you
would
get
an
estimate
for
if
we
needed
to
make
any
specific
street
changes,
and
I
do
feel
like
we
need
to
have.
C
I
don't
know
who
would
be
able
to
have
the
conversation
with
the
businesses,
but
in
terms
of
equity
for
all
the
downtown
restaurants,
it
does
seem
like
we
would
be
favoring
the
restaurants
that
are
on
our
street
and
giving
them
a
whole
bunch
of
extra
space
when
there
are
just
as
many
fabulous
restaurants
on
cayuga
street.
That
might
say,
hey
wait
a
minute.
Why
is
the
city
spending
120
000
to
close
off
that
street?
Is
anyone
gonna
come
over?
C
You
know
to
my
restaurant,
you
know
and
again,
then
you
could
kind
of
expand
that
out
among
the
city.
So
I
guess
I
would
be
more
in
favor
of
somehow
weaving
this
concept
of
additional
outdoor
dining
areas
into
the
transportation
plan
instead
of,
like
specifically
isolating
aurora
street
out.
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that's
possible,
but
those
are
just
my
thoughts
on
it.
I'm
not
opposed
to
saying
this.
I
agree
that
if
we
want
to
do
this
permanently,
we
have
to
figure
out
a
better
way
to
do
it.
C
F
I
I
would
just
say
I
understand
everything,
you're
saying
and
the
the
part
I
would
want
to
respond
to
is
the
first
part
where
the
idea
that
we
would
just
set
up
the
streetery
again
the
way
we've
been
setting
it
up
and
then
study
it
in
a
slower
way.
That
was
sort
of
my
idea
as
well.
F
But
there
are
enough
concerns
from
people
within
the
city
about
the
truck
safety
and
also
concerns
from
so
many
people
about
the
traffic
issues
and
the
parking
issues
and
loading
issues
that
I
don't
know
if
there
was
much
appetite
to
do
the
streetery.
The
way
that
we
did
it
the
past
couple
years,
so
we
could,
you
know,
potentially
have
a
break
from
straightery
while
we
work
out
these
things,
but
I
know
that
a
lot
of
people
really
want
the
benefits
of
the
streetery.
F
So
it's
not
for
me
to
decide,
but
I
don't
know
that
we
would
set
up
the
streetery
the
way
that
we've
been
setting
it
up.
Basically,
it
feels
to
me
from
the
conversations
I've
been
in
the
choices
would
be
more
likely
take
a
break
from
the
streetery
till
we
work
out
a
much
better
plan
for
it
or
try
to
get
our
consultant
to
help
us
with
a
quick
study.
So
we
can
make
2022
streetery
much
better
and
safer.
C
H
Yeah,
I
I
really
like
what
you
said
deb
and
also
what
aaron
is
saying,
and
it
may
actually
help
with
my
concern
if
we
took
a
year
off
of
the
streetery
for
2022
and
and
measured
whether
that
has
a
change
on
the
businesses
on
south
aurora
street
or
not,
but
I
yeah-
I
don't
want
to
rush
into
this.
I
guess.
C
So
it
sounds
like
if
this
fails
to
pass
committee,
we're
almost
maybe
sending
a
message-
I'm
not
hearing
an
absolute.
No,
what
I'm
hearing
is.
We
maybe
want
this
to
be
broader.
We
want
it
to
be
more
comprehensive.
Maybe
it
could
go
through
the
as
part
of
the
budget
process
for
next
year.
So
if
this
doesn't
get
voted
to
committee,
then
maybe
we
can.
C
I
don't
know
if
there
is
a
some
other
resolution
we
would.
We
would
want
to
pass
to
encourage
other
study.
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is
it
doesn't
sound
like
this
is
gonna
pass
right,
so
I
don't
know
if
you
have
any
other
alternative
or
if
we
were
okay
writing
in
saying
it
would
take
a
year
off
of
the
street
area,
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
move
this
forward.
If
it,
if.
I
C
I
Good
to
see
you,
so
would
it
be
okay?
If
we,
if
we
pulled
back,
had
another
internal
discussion
and
and
maybe
came
back
to
you
next
month,
the
timeline
is
already
tight,
but
here
hearing
council's
concerns
and
interest,
I'm
I
am
wondering
what
data
and
feedback
we
can
pull
together.
The
dia
did
a
number
of
surveys
that
might
be
useful
in
guiding
our
decision
making
here
and
both
you
know,
I
don't
want
to
miss
out
on
the
economic
impact
of
the
streetery.
I
The
last
numbers
I
remember
were
actually
from
when
we
expanded
the
sidewalk
on
aurora
street
about
a
decade
in
it
over
a
decade
ago
to
allow
for
that
extra
outdoor,
dining
and
what
we
found
then
was
that
each
additional
chair
that
was
outside
added
about
ten
thousand
dollars
in
revenue
if
the
street
area
allowed
for
more
even
more
chairs
than
they're,
used
to
that's,
of
course,
more
revenue,
which
is
good
not
just
for
the
business
owners,
but
also
for
the
property
owners
on
aurora
street,
and
I
think
that
the
primary
interest,
which
is
all
of
our
employees,
who
are
working
really
hard
in
that
sector
right
now,
and
of
which
we're
trying
to
attract
and
recruit
more
people.
I
It
was
also
you
know,
I
think,
culturally
a
big
hit
and
it
made
the
street
very
festive
and
all
the
restaurants
very
busy
and
successful.
So
I
I
don't
want
to
to
scrap
it
out
of
hand
if
this
data
is
out
there.
So,
if
it's
okay,
if
we
pull
this
for
now
and
I'll,
go
to
gary
in
the
dia,
pull
our
staff
back
together
again
and
then
come
back
to
you
with
another
proposal
or
a
modified
proposal.
C
Sure
I
would
also
ask
that
we
try
to
talk
to
businesses
also
outside
of
aurora
street
as
well.
You
know
if
there
is
any
sort
of
additional
information
you
could
have.
I
know
that
there
were
also
creative
solutions
to
putting
chairs
all
over
the
place
outside
of
different
restaurant
kind
of
expanding
seating
areas
and
different
places.
I
think
there
is
a
seating
area
on
the
commons
now
that
wasn't
there.
C
I
I'm
sure,
yeah
and
and
that
that
point's
well
taken
and
the
one
that
I
believe
I
heard
dachshund
making,
which
is
you
know
we
don't
know
the
right
thing
to
do
without
a
study.
Unless
we
do
a
study,
we
don't
know
the
right
thing
to
do.
I
What
kind
of
logic
trap
there?
So
I
I
think
that
that
makes
sense.
I
do
also
want
to
hold
out
part
of
why
I
think
this
is
a
good
investment
right.
Now
is
two
things
one
I
I
feel
high
confidence
and
I'm
going
to
speak
this
into
reality
about
our
downtown
revitalization
initiative
grant
this
year.
I
I
believe
that
we're
going
to
be
very
competitive
and
that
that
10
million
grant
includes
infrastructure
to
help
us
expand
the
footprint
of
the
commons
which
this
would
fall
under
and,
second,
I
think
any
any
study
that
gets
us
in
a
position
for
shovel
ready
projects
will
be
good,
given
that
the
president
signed
into
de
la
the
one
trillion
dollar
infrastructure
bill
this
week.
I
believe
that
the
bill
signing
was
this
week,
and
I
think
this
could
be
a
good
avenue
for
funds
in
the
in
the
future.
F
I
F
F
F
H
I
Instead
of
instead
of
waiting
a
month,
why
don't
we
wait
two
weeks
I'll
see
what
I
can
pull
together
by
the
council
meeting
and
member
filed
the
resolution
in
december?
If
it's
ready,
if
it
doesn't
ready,
then
if
it's
not
ready,
then
we'll
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
and,
as
aaron
suggested,
see
what
can
be
done
absent
a
full
full
study.
C
Right,
you
know-
and
I
also
think
you're
assuming
that
you-
you
have
a
very
particular
month
in
mind
that
you
would
want
to
set
the
streetery
up.
You
know
so
having
the
study
and
having
the
information
will
still
be
helpful.
It
might
mean
that
the
street
area
would
open
mid-summer
instead
of
you
know
the
beginning
of
the
season
or
something
like
that
and
again
I
don't
know
what
kinds
of
modifications
would
need
to
be
made.
C
So
whenever
you
do,
if
it's
going
to
involve
any
kind
of
construction,
no
matter
when
you
do
construction
in
that
area,
it's
going
to
bog
traffic
down,
so
I
don't
know
I
think
you
could
be
flexible
about.
Maybe
when
you
would
want
to
reopen
the
streetery
or
maybe
you
take
part
of
the
season
off.
While
we
get
the
information,
I
think
there's
possibility
here
from
maneuvering
the
timeline
on
both
ends.
G
C
H
No,
no
it's
new.
Does
this
mean
we're
not
voting
on
this.
H
I
guess
I
have
a
problem
with
that,
because
voting
on
this
is
what
we've
been
asked
to
do
the
other
thing
I'll
just
point
out
and
why
it
should
be
part
of
the
whole
traffic
study.
Is
we
have
two
actually
three
very
large
apartment
complexes
being
built
or
about
to
be
built
right,
downtown,
so
closing
south
aurora
street
for
half
the
year
is
definitely
going
to
impact
traffic
when
those
places
come
come
online.
H
I
much
prefer
the
choice
of
of
giving
the
streetery
a
year
off
to
see
how
much
that
really
affects
the
economics
of
south
aurora
street
and
making
it
part
of
a
more
complete
study.
J
So
hearing
that
there
are
procedural
objections,
so
to
speak,
I
mean,
I
think
the
bottom
line
just
to
remind
everyone,
is
that
george
can
make
a
motion
to
call
the
question.
Dad
could
call
the
question
or
somebody
can
make
a
motion
to
table
and
the
committee
can
decide
how
to
proceed.
E
Yeah,
it
was
I
I
it's
not
about
the
procedural
question
or
whether
we're
going
to
vote
or
not,
but
it
was
just
a
highlight
that
I
thought
it
was
helpful
for
aaron
to
outline
for
us
what
the
elements
of
the
proposed
study
were,
and
I
hope
we
could
see
that
more
detailed
in
writing.
Next
time.
We
see
this.
C
Okay,
does
that
have
a
second
seconded
by
rob
all
right,
so
we'll
vote
on
tabling
so
tabling
it
would
just
mean
that
at
a
future
date
we
will
vote
on
it,
and
I
hear
what
you're
saying
george,
but
I
think
this
isn't.
I
know.
Yes,
we're
usually
asked
to
vote
on
something,
but
we
also
have
the
right
to
say
I
don't
feel
comfortable
voting
on
this
yet
because
I
don't
have
enough
information
in
order
to
make
the
decision.
C
C
I
also
think
we
need
to
to
figure
out
what
what
a
new
normal
pattern
is
for
people
visiting
restaurants
and
what
you
know,
what
a
comfort
level
is
and
how
we
can
support
small
businesses.
It's
going
to
take
them
a
while
to
recover
from
the
pandemic.
So
anything
we
can
do
in
order
to
look
at
all
of
our
downtown
businesses.
And
you
know
if
there's
foot
traffic
at
restaurants,
then
there's
foot
traffic
and
stores
and-
and
I
do
think
that
is
good
for
the
entire
downtown.
So
I
think
but
I
but
I
agree.
C
C
H
H
C
Do
we
have
questions
on
this?
This
was
something
that
we
talked
about
at
the
budget
process.
I
do
have
a
couple
questions
but
I'll,
but
I'll
ask
if
others
do
before
I
ask
mine
or
if
ari
wants
to
say
anything.
First
go
ahead.
Sorry.
J
Oh
thanks
dad
yeah
one.
Just
very
brief
note.
This
was
drafted,
as
I
think
most
of
you
know
during
the
budget
process
at
council
request
and
as
a
result,
there
may
be
some
minor
tweaks
just
in
terms
of
updating
to
the
realities
of
what
happened
in
the
budget
process
that
I'm
hoping
yeah.
Some
combination
of
steve
and
perhaps
deb
can
guide
us
on
right
now.
C
H
This
is
a
question,
is
part
of
what
hsc
is
is
going
to
review?
Is
the
current
status
of
the
finances
of
these
organizations
or
just.
C
Yeah,
I
think
that
one
of
one
of
my
questions
was
we
sort
of
left
things
I
think
in
limbo,
with
the
human
services
coalition
kind
of
pending
whether
or
not
we
funded
what
organizations
we
funded
right.
So
I
think
what
we
haven't
done
is
circle
back
to
the
human
services
coalition
and
say:
oh,
we
indeed
do
want
you
to
do
something
for
us
right.
C
My
other
question
was
that
so
southside
community
center
already
went
through
a
program
review
from
the
human
services
coalition
because
they
are
funded
through
that
other
city
sales
tax
equation.
So
it
wouldn't
make
sense
to
include
southside
community
center
in
this,
because
they
already
had
a
program
review
from
human
services
coalition,
and
I
also
thought
we
were.
C
Going
to
do
something
similar
was
the
funding
that
was
going
for
right
to
council
was
that
funneling
through
law
new
york
was
that
something
that
we
wanted
to
add
to
this
resolution
as
well.
It
was
like
50
questions
in
in
in
a
bunch
of
sentences,
but
I
don't
know
if
anyone's
memory
is
better
than
mine
on
what
and
what
we
decided
to
do.
C
But
in
any
case
someone
should
circle
back
to
the
human
services
coalition
and
say
we're
ready
for
you
to
do
this,
and
I
think
we
just
need
to
be
okay
with
whatever
they
say
they
can
do
for
us,
and
I
don't
know
how
much
we
can
prescribe
what
they're
able
to
do.
E
Yeah
thanks
deb
and
thank
you
for
raising
those
issues
I
do.
I
do
think
those
are
all
important
and
I
think
it's
especially
important
that
we're
consistent
in
the
way
we
do
this.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
we
get
this
right
and
I
guess
my
question
was
was
related
and
it's
it's
the
intent
of
the
statement
in
the
third,
whereas
about
having
hsc
periodically
conduct
reviews.
E
D
C
Of
any
organization
that
receives
funding
from
that
sales
tax
equation,
so
we
could
just
simply
change
periodically
to
annually.
I
think
the
intent
of
that,
whereas
is
to
acknowledge
that
there
already
is
a
process
by
which
other
organizations
go
through
in
order
to
receive
funding
from
the
city
in
the
county.
So
I'm
I
would
be
fine.
A
C
E
Yeah,
it
would
to
me
as
the
seconder,
so
I
I
also
wanna
what
was
the
other
question?
Oh,
I
think
I
also
remember
the
conversation
I
think,
and
I
and
I
don't
know
if
this
was
just
applying
to
south
side
community
center
because
they
have
been
through
these
kind
of
program
reviews.
E
But
I
think
there
was
an
interest
in
in
having
at
the
next
time
that
there's
a
request
for
city
funds
from
any
of
these
organizations,
including
south
side,
community
center,
that
there's
a
reporting
to
us
about
how
the
funds
are
used
and
how
many
people
are
supported,
and
that
is
indicated.
I
think
in
the
last
revolve
sec
resolved
second
bullet
point.
Maybe
so
I
I
don't.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that,
when
we're
asking
this
of
organizations
we're
also
being
consistent
in
who
we're
asking
it
of
regardless
of
these
other
program
reviews.
E
C
J
So,
where
the
outreach
to
human
services
coalition
is
concerned,
I'm
not
particularly
sure
who
the
right
staff
people
are
for
that
and
being
unsure,
I'm
guessing
that
it
will
make
the
most
sense
for
that
to
be
my
office.
If
anyone
has
a
different
idea
in
mind,
I
welcome.
G
C
We'll
tackle
it
together,
I
think
kathy
was
perfectly
agreeable
to
do
something,
but
then,
like
the
missing
link,
was
I
don't
know
that
we
looped
her
in
that
we
were
doing
this
and
then
I
I
will
you
know,
take
responsibility
for
dropping
the
ball
on
it,
but
I
think
what
we
probably
should
do
is.
I
still
think
we
can
pass
this
resolution
tonight.
C
We
can
reach
out
to
kathy
and
get
a
sense
of
what
they
are
willing
to
do
and
then,
if
we
need
to
make
some
minor
changes,
for
you
know
we
could
we
could
pull
south
side
out
and
create
another,
whereas
that
says,
whereas
southside
community
center
has
already
gone
through
program
review,
something
like
that,
we
could.
We
could
pull
that
out
easily
and
then
we
can
double
check
and
make
sure
there
weren't
other
service
organizations
that
we
funded
in
the
city's
budget.
C
That
hasn't
haven't
gone
through
this
as
well,
because
I
don't
remember
what
the
resolution
was
around
the
wasn't
there
something
about
law,
new
york,
where
some
of
that
money
was
going.
C
But
I
think
laura
was
saying
that
she
would
be
comfortable
if
we
were
and
to
rob's
point
earlier,
essentially
we're
trying
to
invent
a
new
process
for
how
we
vet
funding
human
service
agencies
with
city
dollars
kind
of
on
the
fly
so
which
is
fine
and-
and
I
agree
that
we
need
some
sort
of
process
for
it,
but
it's
kind
of
like
I
don't
know.
Instead
of
the
cart
before
the
horse.
The
cart
after
the
I
don't
know,
that's
a
terrible
analogy.
C
I
think
we
agree
that
we
need
to
do
something
in
order
to
get
us
the
information
that
we
desire
when
we're
funding
these
human
service
agencies.
But
I
don't
know
that
we
put
all
of
the
details
of
it
in
place
and
that's
what
this
resolution
I
think
was
intending
to
do
so,
since
faith
will
be
coordinating
the
budget
process
for
next
year.
It
makes
sense
to
yank
her
into
this
conversation
and
figure
out
what
we
can
do
to
band-aid
this
for
this
year
and
then
make
some
good
recommendations
for
next
year's
budget
process.
J
That
makes
sense,
I'm
and
deb
to
your
point
or
question
for
the
committee,
I'm
not
sure
which
it
is
about
how
to
handle
southside's
presence
in
this
resolution.
J
I
I
I
can
imagine
the
committee
may
want
to
consider
south
side
with
respect
to
each
of
the
resolves
differently,
which
is
to
say
that
I
believe
the
comment
you
just
made
is
that
you,
you
don't
believe
south
side
belongs
in
the
first
or
perhaps
second
dissolved,
but
it
may
still
belong
in
the
third
resolve.
H
One
of
these
organizations
received
a
grant
this
past
year
that
the
people
who
provided
the
grant
and
wrote
the
grant
have
yet
to
see
evidence
of
how
the
money
was
spent,
and
I
would
like
to
make
sure
that
we
find
out
that
information
before
we
release
our
city
funds
to
that
organization.
C
J
So
I
guess,
if
you
were
looking
to
require
that
at
this
resolution
you
would
need
to
add
a
resolved
requiring
you
know
the
organization
or
organizations
to
provide
documentation
of
their
previous
expenditure
of
previous
grants
to
the
city
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
know
how
the
committee
doesn't
want
to
go
about
that,
but
I
think
that's
what
that
was.
C
H
C
D
Thank
you
deb,
so
I'm
just
looking
through,
and
perhaps
you
could
remind
me
so
I
understood
that
all
of
the
funding,
including
that
for
south
side
in
the
budget,
is
in
restricted
contingency
right
now.
Is
that
correct
for
2022.
D
Yeah,
that's
correct,
yeah
and,
to
your
point
deb
about
the
program
review.
I
guess
if
south
side
has
already
been
reviewed,
then
maybe
hsc
can
provide
that
report.
I
mean,
as
far
as
I
can
see,
to
release
that
there
are
three
things:
there's
the
program
review
the
mou
and
then
a
financial
report
on
spending
in
future
years.
So
for
right
now
to
release
the
funding
for
2022.
We
would
need
either
a
program
review
to
be
conducted
or
provided
if
one's
already
been
done
and
the
mousse
is
that
is
that
correct.
D
D
So
if
they've
done
it,
I
guess
my
point
is:
if
they've
done
a
recent
program
review
of
south
side,
I
I'm
not
sure
that
I
recall
seeing
that
so
in
order
for
council
to
release
this,
we
would
want
to
make
sure
they
have
seen
that
program.
Review.
C
D
J
So
graeme,
I
think
this
is
the
same
thing
you
just
said,
but
just
to
make
sure
we're
all
on
the
same
page.
My
understanding
of
this
resolution
is
that
it
requires
the
funding
for
these
organizations
to
remain
in
restricted
contingency
until
council
approves
the
release
of
that
funding
from
restricted
contingency
based
upon
the
program
reviews
that
we
are
hoping
hsc
will
provide
and
that
that
funding
also
wouldn't
be
released
until
mou's
complying
with
those
last
three
bullet
points
in
the
final
resolved
are
prepared.
H
Sorry
to
keep
asking
questions,
but
it's
okay,
if
that's
true
about
the
funds
not
being
released
until
the
three
bullet
points
at
the
last
resolved
are
satisfied.
H
The
second
bullet
point
asks
to
prepare
a
report
detailing
the
manner
of
city
funds
were
expended
by
that
organization
in
2022.
J
So
so
george,
what
I
mean
by
saying
that
the
funds
wouldn't
be
released
until
the
reviews
are
signed
is
that
last
resolved
is
saying
is
providing
requirements
that
that
council
has
did.
We
include
in
the
mou,
so
the
mou
would
require
the
organization
in
the
fall
of
next
year
to
show
how
they
have
spent
the
money,
but
it
doesn't
mean
that
they
wouldn't
get
their
funding
till
next
fall.
C
J
H
C
H
H
D
This
is
item
3.3
wellness
incentive,
whereas
in
the
face
of
the
pandemic
in
2020,
the
city
changed
health
insurance
options
for
the
mayor,
in
addition
to
management
and
confidential
employees,
among
others,
to
establish
the
platinum
plan
as
the
standard
health
insurance
available
and
whereas,
in
summer
2021.
The
csea
administrative
unit
likewise
agreed
to
a
labor
contract
establishing
the
platinum
plan
as
the
standard
health
insurance
option
for
its
membership
and
in
support
thereof,
the
city
agreed
to
provide
all
employees
in
that
bargaining
unit
and
confidentials
who
are
enrolled
in
the
platinum
plan.
D
The
opportunity
to
receive
substantial
financial
incentives
for
successful
participation
in
the
platinum
plans,
wellness
program
and
whereas,
on
september,
1
2021
as
updated
on
november
3rd
2021,
the
common
council
adopted
a
resolution
that
implemented
wellness
program,
incentives
for
management
and
likewise
expanded
2021
payment
eligibility
eligibility
for
the
same
for
confidentials,
providing
those
employees
who
were
enrolled
in
the
platinum
plan.
As
of
july
1
2021
with
applicable
wellness
amounts
in
22
221
pro
rated
at
50
percent
value,
without
any
need
to
satisfy
oneness
targets
in
2021,
I.e.
D
D
As
of
november
3rd
2021
shall
receive
applicable
wellness
allowance
in
2021
at
100
percent
value,
without
any
need
to
satisfy
violence
targets
in
2021,
I.e,
2
000
dollars
for
family
plan
participants
and
750
for
individual
plan
participants
and
in
succeeding
four
years
at
100
value
subject
to
achieving
applicable
target
and
whereas
those
prior
resolutions
were
premised
upon
the
belief
that
the
management
that
management
should
receive.
Not
only
the
burden
of
organization-wide
shifts
should
receive
not
only
the
burden
of
organization-wide
shifts
in
the
city's
labor
contracts,
but
also
the
benefits.
D
And
whereas
the
mayor's
role
as
a
chief
as
working
chief
executive
officer
of
the
organization
justifies
providing
the
mayor
with
benefits.
Equivalent
to
those
provided
to
management
employed
by
the
city.
Now,
therefore
be
resolved.
That
the
mayor,
if
enrolled
in
the
platinum
plan,
shall
be
eligible
for
the
wellness
incentive
on
the
same
terms
as
management
and
be.
D
In
in
light
of
the
inability
to
administer
wellness
testing
in
the
short
remainder
of
2021,
the
mayor,
if
enrolled
in
the
platinum
plan,
as
of
january,
1,
2021
shall
receive
applicable.
Wellness
amounts
in
2021
on
the
same
terms
as
debt
management,
namely
at
100
value,
without
any
need
to
justify
wellness
targets
in
the
2021,
I.e.
D
2
000
for
the
family
plan,
participants
and
750
dollars
for
the
individual
plan
participants
and
in
succeeding
four
years
at
100
value,
subject
to
achieving
applicable
targets,
as
provided
in
the
fringe
benefits
for
management
personnel
policy
and
associated
implementation
of
the
wellness
program,
and
be
a
further
result
that
this
resolution
shall
cease
to
apply
to
the
position
of
mayor
at
such
time.
If
any,
as
the
city
shifts
to
a
council
manager,
form
of
government,
and
I
so
move.
J
J
That
shift
in
turn
was
also
applied
to
management
recently,
I
think,
just
a
couple
months
ago
by
common
council,
and
it
was
brought
to
our
attention
that
the
it
may
be
appropriate
to
consider
for
the
mayor
as
well,
because
the
mayor
serves
in
a
working
chief
executive
officer
capacity,
much
like
a
city
employee.
J
C
C
A
A
Now,
therefore,
being
enacted
by
the
common
council
of
the
city
of
ithaca
as
follows:
section
1!
It
is
the
intent
of
this
local
law
to
amend
chapter
107
of
the
city
code
in
order
to
effectuate
the
revised
2022
salaries
of
council
members
and
the
mayor,
as
funded
in
the
2022
approved
budget
with
said
salary.
To
be
effective,
as
of
january
1st
2022.,
the
common
council
makes
the
following
finals
of
fact,
members
of
the
common
council
and
the
mayor,
expend
substantial
efforts
and
devote
large
amounts
of
time
to
their
duties
and
b.
A
The
annual
salaries
of
the
members
of
common
council
of
the
mayor
were
last
adjusted
nearly
six
years
ago,
and
there
has
been
some
inflation
in
the
intervening
years.
Section
two
section
107-1
of
the
city
code
is
hereby
amended
as
follows.
The
annual
salary
of
the
mayor
shall
be
in
the
sum
of
61
489.
A
A
Severability
is
intended
to
route
and
within
the
provisions
of
I,
this
local
that
standard
stuff
upon
filing
out
in
the
office
of
secretary
of
state.
This
local
law
she'll
take
effect
retroactive
to
january
1st
2022.
This
local
law
is
subject
to
referendum
on
petition
pursuant
to
municipal
home
rule
section
24.,
that's
the
move.
C
J
Yeah
sure
I
can
give
a
brief
overview
overview.
So,
as
the
committee
knows
you
and
the
rest
of
council
as
part
of
the
budget
process
selected,
these
increased
salary
levels
for
council
and
mayor
in
order
to
effectuate
the
increase
of
salary
levels
during
an
elected
term,
which
is
true
of
both
five
of
the
council
seats
and
also
on
the
mayor's
seat
it
needs
to.
It
is
subject
to
a
permissive
referendum,
which
is
why
this
is
drafted.
This
way.
J
That
in
turn
means
that
there
needs
to
be
a
45-day
waiting
period
after
the
mayor
signs.
The
local
law
before
it
can
be
filed
with
the
new
york
state
department
of
state,
which
is
what
causes
a
local
law
to
actually
take
effect.
That
45-day
waiting
period
will
push
us
into
next
year,
which
means
that
the
local
law
won't
take
effect
until
late
january
or
quite
possibly,
sometime
in
february
of
next
year,
and
this
is
drafted
to
upon
effectiveness.
J
Have
the
increases
retro
retroactive
to
january
1st,
which
appeared
to
be
council's
intent
in
the
budget
process.
So
that
is
why
this
is
drafted.
That
way,
this
way
and-
and
I
believe
it's
already
been
laid
on
the
table,
though,
if
for
some
reason
there
is
something
you'd
like
to
amend,
I
believe
we
could
lay
it
on
on
the
table
again.
Tomorrow,
I
think,
might
be
our
last
day
if
you
need
any
changes.
A
A
I
just
want
to
thank
george
that
he
was
a
huge
pusher
of
this
for
years.
I'm
glad
we're.
Finally,
here
it's
always
awkward
to
give
yourself
a
raise,
and
so
that's
why
council
has
repeatedly
declined
to
do
so,
but
I
think
there's
been,
I
actually
reached
out
to
people
and
everybody
agreed
that
council
should
work
at
a
living
wage.
So
I
talked
to
taxpayers
like
city
taxpayers,
and
so
they
were
willing
to
spend
more
money
themselves
to
pay
us
better.
A
But
I
do
hope
that
in
soon
next
year
or
sometime
soon
that
we
figure
out
an
automatic
pay
increase.
D
Yeah,
I
also
want
to
thank
my
esteemed
college
for
calling
from
the
first
award
for
his
patience
and
his
annual
persistence
in
terms
of
bringing
this
topic
up.
Obviously,
it
finally
paid
off
I'm
very
happy
to
support
this
and
and
as
ducks
and
said,
hopefully
that
the
future
council
will
come
up
with
a
process
for
making
this
an
easier
process
to
go
through
in
the
future.
So
thank
you,
george
very
much
for
guiding
this
through,
finally
to
a
a
vote
and
a
local
law.
So
thanks.
C
H
I
appreciate
that,
but
it
wouldn't
have
happened.
It
would
have
been
just
the
same
as
every
year
if
the
rest
of
council
didn't
support
it,
and
I
agree
with
both
duck
and
graham
that
it
would
be
ideal
if
we
could
set
this
up
in
such
a
way
that
there
was
a
gradual
increase
based
on
something
and
I'm
not
sure
what
that
is.
But
I
will
say
that
everybody
is
invited
to
take
a
ride
in
my
new
cadillac
as
soon
as
it
comes
in.
Thank
you.
C
Any
other
comments
on
this
before
we
vote
all
those
in
favor
and
that
carries
unanimously
great.
I
think
that
was
it
for
this
evening.
We've
got
one
more
ca
meeting.
I
think
it
sounds
like
we're.
Gonna
have
a
pretty
full
agenda
for
our
december
council
meeting.
So
does
anyone
have
any
anything
we
need
to
talk
about
for
december's
meeting.
A
Have
a
good
question,
I
don't
remember:
do
we
have
a
plan
in
place
for
defining
the
correct,
like
the
the
roles
and
responsibilities
of
the
volunteer
coordinator,
constituent
services
person
you
added
to
the
budget?
C
It's
in
faith's
hands,
yes,
she's
on
it.
I
think
what
we're
doing
is
waiting
for
the
new
council
to
come
on
board
and
then
there'll
be
a
working
group
pulled
together.
That
is
going
to
do
a
combination
of
commission
analysis
and
job
description
development.
So
it'll
it'll
take
a
bit
of
time
a
few
months,
but
I
think
there's
there
I
think
rob
can
telmo
was
interested
in
serving
on
that
group.
So
we'll
wait
until
the
new
members
are
seated
and
then
the
mayor
and
faith
will
convene
that
working
group
and
they'll
get
started.