►
From YouTube: November 23, 2020 IURA Board Mtg.
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
E
You
know
I
I
opened
my
laptop
and
I
was
okay
and
then
I
just
took
notes.
I
don't
know
if
I
can
see
everything
while
I
talk
about
it,
but
I
did
have.
I
did
have
a
quick
question.
I'm
gonna
ask
you
now
you
know
in
the
parking
garage
for
the
for
the
east
side,
one
it
says
something
about.
If
it
gets
too
expensive,
then
we
don't.
The
city
doesn't
have
to
do
a
lease
right.
B
E
B
E
E
B
C
B
D
Morning
carl
how's,
your
volume.
D
D
B
B
G
Yes,
can
you
hear
me
yes,
great
hi,
everyone.
H
B
You
could
try,
could
you
try
the
phone
for
voice
and
youtube
for.
H
I
Hey
morning,
sorry,
I'm
late
and
apologies
for
being
on
my
phone.
The
two
are
related
trying
to
get
my
computer
to
boot
properly.
So,
hopefully
I'll
switch
over
just
a
minute.
B
Carl's
experiencing
some
voice
problems
as
well.
I
B
Yes-
and
we
have
at
least
one
person
for
public
comment,
who's
on
on
the
zoom
call:
okay,.
I
Well,
I
have
I
have
the
agenda
up
on
my
computer.
I
just
can't
connect
to
zoom,
so
I'll
leave
the
it's.
Okay
I'll
lead
it
that
way.
Any
changes
to
the
agenda,
any
distractions
deletions.
I
C
I
I
A
Hi
steve
good
morning,
so
should
I
go
ahead?
Yes,
okay!
So,
as
many
of
you
may
know,
my
name
is
steve
flash
and
I'm
a
member
of
finger
lakes,
development
together
with
jeffrey
rimland,
and
we
understand
and
support
the.
C
A
As
I
said,
my
name
is
steve
flash
and
I'm
part
of
finger
lakes
development.
We
do
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
know
in
the
interest
and
support
that
in
the
interest
of
openness
and
transparency
that
this
process
should
be
opened,
for
you
know
consideration
of
any
other
proposals
and,
of
course
we
thank
you
also
for
considering
the
proposal
previously
submitted
as
our
expression
of
interest.
A
A
A
The
while
I
understand
it
is
open.
I
think
the
fundamental
difference
between
our
proposal
and
any
other
proposal
that
may
come
in
is
that
we
can
assure
that
all
of
the
cross
easements
whether
or
not
it's
for
sewer
for
electric
for
parking.
All
of
that
can
easily
be
accomplished
by
virtue
of
the
of
our
ownership.
A
Since
the
closure
of
the
johnson's
marina,
which
is
now
the
city
harbor
parcel,
is
the
only
marina
and
boatyard
at
this
end
of
the
lake.
We
are
the
only
place
that
can
haul
out
larger
boats
and
store
them.
We
have
over
240
boats
that
we
haul
out
every
year
and
launch
every
spring
and
we
have
the
only
marine
store,
so
we
offer
pontoon
rentals.
A
We
are
now
offering
you
know
fishing
services
bait
and
tackle
so
people
can
get
out
in
the
water.
These
are
the
services
that
that
we
we
provide,
and
likewise,
as
you
are
aware,
the
boatyard
grill
also
requires
parking.
So
both
of
these
businesses
have
over
time
worked
with
the
city
because,
for
example,
the
storage
of
boats
requires
you
know,
transport
across
the
city,
road
and
onto
city
property,
and
that
has
worked
so
far.
A
And
so
the
development
of
pro
approach
is
going
to
require
really
a
very
coordinated
approach
between
the
city
parcel
to
be
developed
and
the
businesses,
which
is
something
obviously
that
we
can
offer.
A
Okay,
so,
and
so
with
that
in
mind,
we're
looking
forward
to
working
with
the
city
and
developing
our
proposal
and
allowing
these
businesses
to
continue
and
really
to
create
the
destination
that
we've
all
been
looking
for.
So
I
appreciate
your
consideration
and
thank
you.
I
Thank
you
steve
appreciate
it
good
to
see
you
good
to
see
you
so
that
item
is,
of
course,
on
the
agenda,
so
we'll
get
to
discuss
that
and
just
just
two
agenda
items
from
now.
Would
anyone
like
to
move
the
minutes
first
from
last
month.
I
Thank
you
any
discussion
in
the
minutes.
I
Hearing
none
that's
got
that
takes
on
a
whole
different,
meaning
right
now
that
I'm
actually
trying
to
hear
so
hearing
no
discussion,
all
those
in
favor,
aye,
aye
and
opposed
sounds
like
that
carries
unanimously
thanks.
So
we'll
go
straight
into
the
ed
committee.
J
Great
thank
you.
We
have
a
number
of
agenda
items
from
the
eddy
committee
for
your
consideration
this
morning.
So
thanks
everybody
for
your
patience
as
we
work
through
them,
so
they're
really
grouped
in
two.
So
the
first
two
agenda
items
are
really
about
the
green
street
garage
redevelopment
urban
renewal
project,
which
continues
to
move
forward.
J
So
what
we
have
is
actually
two
amended
disposition
and
development
agreements
for
your
consideration.
So
the
first,
I
think,
we'll
focus
on
looks
like
the
western
and
central
sections,
which
is
the
astiri
project.
Facino
group
is
the
developer
and
I
think
representatives
of
the
development
team
are
here
I'll,
give
you
a
very
quick
high
level
and
then
I'll
ask
nels
if
to
cover
any
off
any
detail.
That
is
necessary.
So
I
think
most
of
you
have
probably
seen
in
a
number
of
different
fora.
J
There
was
a
a
negotiation
really
between
the
visino
project
and
its
neighbor,
harold
holdings
about
it
through
the
planning
board
process
about
how
much
space
would
essentially
end
up
being
between
the
two
buildings
and
effects
of
the
development
of
the
vasino
project,
on
proximity
to
the
harold's
project,
few
sheds
etc.
So
I
think
in
the
end,
there
was
a
negotiated
agreement
between
the
parties
that
would
actually
expand
that
space,
which
is
the
alleyway
really
behind
what
is
now
currently
the
parking
garage
between
those
two
projects.
J
The
net
result
of
that
is
to
make
that
project
work
is
the
project
had
to
essentially
go
back
and
and
look
at
the
design
and
the
engineering
of
that,
and
that
means
that
there's
going
to
be
a
small
decrease
in
the
number
of
units
to
make
that
project
work
so
you'll
see
that
I
don't
have
that
directly
in
front
of
me.
Nels
can
probably
stay
off
the
top
of
his
head
from
217
to
181,
so
we're
still
getting
a
significant
amount
of
affordable
units
on
the
property,
we're
still
getting
a
parking
garage,
etc.
J
I
mean
at
the
core
program
that
we
have
approved
through
this
project
is
going
to
continue,
but
we're
looking
at
a
decrease
of
217
to
181
and
us,
and
some
reconfiguration
of
those
units
to
some
a
slight
increase
in
the
number
of
smaller
units
again
to
kind
of
work
within
the
footprint.
That's
going
to
be
available
to
meet
everyone's
requirements.
For
that
kind
of
complex
site,
so
we
had
already
approved
a
a
dda.
Previously,
it
looks
like
charles
is
pulling
it
up
on
the
screen
as
well.
J
B
Chris,
I
think
you
hit
that
you
did
hit
the
highlights
correctly.
There
is
an
alternative
as
well.
That
was
resized
that
in
the
event
the
conference
center
doesn't
turn
out
to
be
feasible,
there
could
be
a
a
housing
project
that
would
be
a
little
bit
larger
at
236
units.
That's
another
change
there.
I
just
noticed
in
my
packet
that,
what's
in
here,
is,
is
kind
of
the
the
clean
version
rather
than
the
redline
version,
which
I
intended
to
submit
here.
B
So
I
did
want
to
let
you
know
that
some
of
those
items
that
were
referenced
in
casinos
letter
at
the
front
regarding
storage
and
some
of
those
units
has
have
there
been
some
evolutions
in
the
dda
term
sheet
that
reflect
those
things
they're
still
meeting
they're
still
providing
you
know.
Essentially
they
are
in
conformance
in
a
general
way,
but
there
were
some
particulars
where
they
deviated
from
the
original
standards.
I
think
they
did
a
good
job
building
in
quite
a
bit
of
storage,
natural
light.
Every
bedroom
has
a
window.
B
K
Hey
good
morning,
nails
I
just
had
to
re-dial
in
on
my
phone
because
my
my
internet
just
jumped
off,
and
so
I
don't
have
access
to
the
screen.
But
I
appreciate
the
lead
in
there,
as
I
heard
chris
mentioning
and
then
you
following
up.
Yes,
we
had
a
little
bit
of
rework
to
do
in
the
in
the
interim,
and
I
think
we've
got
a
really
solid
job
of
trying
to
maintain
all
of
the
requirements
that
we
agreed
to.
Initially.
K
As
you
pointed
out
there,
you
know,
as
if
you
could
imagine
we're
being
essentially
squeezed
on
all
sides
from
green
street
to
the
south
harold's
holdings
to
the
north.
We
have
to
maintain
a
distance
to
the
garage
on
the
east,
we're
trying
to
maintain
as
much
room
as
possible
on
the
west
and
so
everything
just
sort
of
pushed
around,
and
but
we
ended
up
with,
as
you
pointed
out,
the
181
units,
many
of
which
are
within
the
compliance
of
the
storage
and
daylight
requirements.
K
B
Thanks
bruce
the
the
goal
that
we
had
for
meeting
these
kind
of
storage
window
daylight
cupboards
counter
space
requirements
was
to
really
make
sure
that
these
affordable
units
would
be
very
competitive
in
the
market
for
the
next
30
years,
so
really
trying
to
make
sure
there's
a
minimum
quality
that
will
attract
this
unit
to
have
very
low
rate
vacancies.
I
think
they
did
a
good
job
balancing
out
the
issues
for
this
project.
E
B
Yeah,
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
building
code
requirement.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
the
building
code
doesn't
require
any
natural
light
and
the
city,
I
believe,
if
I
have
as
long
as
you
have
ventilation,
the
eight
percent
standard
is
is
is
a
benchmark
for
the
nine
percent
tax
credit
project
program,
which
has
a
seventy
percent
subsidy.
So
it's
easier
to
meet
those
requirements,
whereas
this
is
a
four
percent
tax
credit
project
doesn't
in
and
doesn't
have
those
same
requirements
in
their
design.
B
Booklet
from
the
state
so
they'll
be
fully
meeting
the
state
requirements.
We
went
above
and
beyond
to
incorporate
nine
percent
standards
as
our
goals
originally
and
that's
where
the
framework
is
coming
from.
E
G
Just
one
other-
and
that's
I
don't
know
if
it
was
mentioned-
I
I
know
that
while
we
have
a
reduction
in
the
number
of
affordable
units
here,
there
is
the
possibility
and
and
however
remote
with
that
other
side.
Understanding,
if
I,
if
that's
still
that's
still
in
place
between
harold
square
and
vasino,
where
harold
square,
which
is
also
the
owner
of
the
chain
works
project
on
south
hill,
has
allocated
some
potential
space
for
affordable
units
that
would
be
developed
by
vecino.
G
Now
I
know
that
harold
square
does
not
own
that
property
yet
still
owned
by
emerson
and
and
there's
a
lot
still
to
be
done
there
on
that
site.
Before
I
imagine,
transfer
of
ownership,
including
whatever
complete
remediation,
needs
to
take
place
there,
but
but
that
agreement
is
still
in
place
right.
There
is
the
possibility
that
some
of
the
units
we've
lost
here
would
be
would
be
replaced
on
south
hill.
F
Yeah
that's
correct:
yeah.
We
have
a
option
agreement
for
a
partnership.
It's
just
a
little
over
an
acre,
and
I
think
the
last
count
rick
was
that
about
100
units.
We
could
get
on
that
site.
L
Yeah,
it's
estimated
roughly
100
units
and
yeah
we've
got
an
option
on
this
for
about
the
next
two
and
a
half
three
years.
So
hopefully
that
gives
time
for
everything
to
play
out,
if
not
revisit
at
that
time,
and
please
yeah,
it
would
be
a
great
great
location
for
more
affordable
housing
up
on
the
hill.
I
completely
agree
with
you.
I
I
D
B
Lori
there's
an
abundant
amount
of
information
regarding
the
financing
and
the
construction
cost
of
the
project,
and
the
conference
conference
center
group
is
doing
a
lot
of
work
with
selecting
an
operator
and
interviewing
the
operator
and
trying
to
pin
down
the
very
final
cost
structure,
both
from
an
operating
perspective
and
casinos,
working
on
the
construction
side
and
and
I'm
working
with
steve,
thayer
and
tom
on
the
financing
side.
So
they
all
kind
of
come
together
to
have
to
you
know,
come
to
a
common
ground
for
feasibility,
we're
working
towards
that.
B
But
there
is
it's
a
little
high
right
now
and
they'll
have
to
work
on
some
change.
You
know
cost
savings
measures.
The
one
thing
that's
come
forward
from
the
state
that
I
think
is
important
to
keep
in
mind
is
that
they've
made
it.
The
housing
component
for
affordable
housing
has
come
in
quite
a
bit
above
term
sheet,
which
means
it's
it's
above
their
normal
subsidy
per
unit
and
the
way
the
state
is
selling
this
to
or
the
way
that
people
are
viewing
this.
B
I
guess
the
state
that
we
hope
or
hopeful
for
is
that
they're
viewing
this
as
a
larger
than
just
an
affordable
housing
project.
It's
a
community
project
that
incorporates
the
community
the
conference
center,
so
the
conference
center
becomes
an
important
plus
for
getting
the
housing
project
constructed
and
financed
so
they're
they're
becoming
more
and
more
linked.
B
I
guess,
as
we
go
forward
and
that's
something
to
keep
in
mind,
but
I
would
think
bruce
would
probably
be
bruce
or
rick
would
be
best
to
address
their
view
on
the
conference
center
as
it's
moving
towards
feasibility.
F
I'll
I'll
say
a
couple
words
and
rick
you
can
chime
in
and
nells
you're
right,
we're
we're
kind
of
teetering
on
the
on
the
estimating
edge
right
now,
the
last
set
of
drawings
that
were
submitted
to
the
construction
team.
Those
estimates
came
back
on
friday
about
4
p.m.
I
have
not
gone
through
them
yet,
but
the
they
did
again
go
down
a
little
bit
from
our
last
set
of
estimates,
which
was
the
best
news
we
had
so
our
gap
got
a
little
bit
smaller.
F
L
Yeah
and
just
thank
you
bruce
yeah
tenell's
point
it
is,
I
think
the
state
is
looking
at
this
as
a
larger
community
project
with
the
conference
center,
obviously
with
parking
garage,
obviously
given
the
state
of
the
new
york
budget,
if
we
were
to
present
a
230
unit
solely
affordable
housing
development
with
the
cost
over
term
sheet,
I
think
we'd
get
some
pushback
on
that
we're.
Looking
at
this
yeah
they're
going
in
together,
I
mean
in
our
mind
we're
100
forward
with
the
conference
center
and
the
the
residential
component
within
the
building.
L
We'll
do
what
we
can
to
make
sure
that
works.
We
think
it's
best
for
the
city
and
given
that
the
chain
works
site,
whether
it
ever
comes
to
christian
or
not,
I
think
that's
a
good
plus
to
kind
of
add
more
units,
and
if
that
one
doesn't
work,
sugar,
look
for
other
parcels
within
the
city
to
add
more
affordable
housing.
As
long
as
you
want
more
housing.
J
All
right
mayor,
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
it
wasn't
moved
so
I'll
make.
J
Okay,
the
next
item
is
looking
at
the
eastern
end,
I'm
just
trying
to
get
to
the
right
place
in
the
packet,
so
also
some
progress
here,
so
the
agency.
If
I
get
this
correct
now,
the
agency
had
approved
a
prior
draft
disposition
development
agreement,
but
it
had
never
been
agreed
to
by
the
developer
because
they
were
trying
to
finalize
what
kinds
of
incentives
and
requirements
would
come
from
the
ida
in
terms
of
affordable
units
as
part
of
the
project.
J
So
this
is
both
got
market
rate
and
below
market
rate
housing
as
a
component
of
it.
So,
but
I
think,
we've
resolved
all
those
issues
now
and
I
think
members
of
the
development
team
are
here
as
well
for
that
project.
So
what
you
have
in
your
packet
is
an
approved
resolution
to
move
this
disposition
agreement
forward.
This
would
as
structured
and
now
charles,
if
you
could
pull
up
the
term
sheet
on
this
one,
if
there's
one
I'm
trying
to
find
it
quickly
on
my
screen
yeah.
J
The
key
here
is:
this
is
one
of
the
first
projects
that
there
we
go.
That
will
also
move
forward
under
sort
of
revised
agreements
for
the
ida,
so
there
will
be
10
of
the
units
in
this
particular
site
will
be
made
at
a
below
market
rate,
and
then
there
will
also
be
a
payment
in
lieu
to
the.
J
Housing
trust
fund
to
build
other
units
as
needed
in
the
city
or
in
the
county.
So
again,
what
you
have
is
an
agreement
here
that
would
build
market
rate
housing.
Some
additional
parking
on
site
some
ground
floor
uses
as
well
and
at
this
point,
we've
kind
of
worked
through
all
of
the
various
changes
and
amendments
and
red
lines
that
you
see
here
with
the
developer,
and
we
believe
that
we've
got
an
agreement
that
everybody
is
satisfied
with
and
ready
to
move
forward.
J
B
Yep,
that's
right,
chris
good.
Good
summary.
I
do
want
to
highlight,
of
course,
that
the
project
does
include
replacement
of
the
two
decks
of
parking
that
are
currently
on
the
site
and
that
the
the
plan
for
that
would
be
the
developer,
would
demolish
and
reconstruct
that
to
those
two
decks
of
parking
about
120
parking
spaces
and
lease
those
back
to
the
city
and
in
the
event,
there
is
an
opt-out
for
the
city
that,
in
the
event,
the
cost
of
that
is
too
high.
B
The
city
can
opt
out
of
the
parking,
in
which
case
the
developer
could
proceed
with
the
project
without
parking
on
those
two
decks
or
we
would
have
to
re
reconfigure.
The
project,
and
the
sense
generally,
is
that
that
parking
is
essential
to
the
project,
and
it
would
certainly
create
some
havoc
if,
if
the,
if
the
city
decided
not
to
pursue
the
public
parking
lease
of
the
of
the
garage,
but
that
option
is
available.
B
That
get
crushed
out,
because
that
was
a
number
that
we
didn't
have
a
good
framework
for
that
number.
Frankly,
at
the
time
we
developed
that
and-
and
it
was
using
the
standard
that
maybe
applied
better
to
the
middle
section
of
the
garage
where
there
was
you
know
some
new
construction
and
some
refurbishment.
E
How
much
do
parking
spaces
usually
make
when
they're
parked
in
and
paid
for.
E
B
Well,
right
now
the
rate
is
a
hundred
dollars
per
month
for
a
monthly
pass
and
the
ideal.
The
ideal
scenario
is
to
turn
that
parking
space.
You
know
over
twice
a
day
or
something
like
that,
so
you
know
maybe
you're
approaching.
You
know
you
know
in
a
good
if
it
were
fully
occupied,
you
know,
or
you
know
something
like
90
occupied
and
you
were
able
to
turn
those
spaces
over
for
short
term
and
monthly
use.
B
You
might
be
able
to
produce
two
thousand
dollars
a
year,
either
current
pricing-
I
I
don't
think
we
don't
project
it
to
be
cost
neutral.
B
I
I
come,
I
could
agree
more.
I
I
completely
agree
with
you
and
I
think
that,
and
I
think
there's
a
environmental
cost
of
of
you
know.
I
secretly
is
the
wrong
word,
but
quietly
subsidizing
parking
to
the
level
that
we
do
and
if
we
let
the
price
of
parking
float
up
to
to
the
actual
market
rate.
Not
only
would
we
break
even
taxpayers
but
we'd
get
a
better
allocation
of
you
know.
People
would
make
different
decisions
about
their
transportation.
I
I
Right
because
there's
not
only
does
it
encourage
more,
you
know
conservatory
behavior,
but
there
are
folks
there's
a
there's,
an
issue
of
justice
and
fairness
about
who's
parking
and
who's.
Not,
and
you
know
that
the
folks
inside
the
city
are
often
subsidizing.
People
who
live
outside
the
city
and
just
commute
in
and
out
for,
lower
housing
prices,
which
causes
like
a
race
to
the
bottom.
E
E
J
That
said
right,
this
project
is
not
going
to
be
able
to
influence
that
other
than
we're
making.
You
know
new
40-year
commitment,
50-year
commitment
to
new
parking
on
this
site
which,
considering
our
agreements
to
the
marriott
hotel,
etc,
are
important,
do
and
you
know,
will
provide
the
common
council
on
the
board
of
public
works,
hopefully
to
rationalize
parking
by
having
a
better
product
to
sell
all
right.
J
J
J
I
Second
carl
discussion,
further
discussion.
D
D
So
my
question
is:
should
that
read
a
minimum
to
provide
10
to
20
of
the
housing
units
at
below
market
rate.
B
I
think
that's
actually
correct.
So
is
the
statement
that
a
minimum
of
10
percent
is
correct.
The
goal
the
10
is
a
minimum.
The
20
percent
is
the
goal
subject
to
financial
feasibility
at
an
eight
percent
cash
on
cash
return
rate,
so
that's
still
embedded
in
the
term
sheet
that
language
about
the
minimum
housing
requirement
and
the
goal.
The
resolution
didn't
didn't
elaborate
on
the
goal,
so
it
could.
It
could
be
amended
to
include
that.
C
K
I
All
right
any
opposed
hearing,
none
that
will
pass
unanimously.
J
Yes,
so
inland
island
urban
renewal
project,
we
have
a
couple
of
resolutions
for
you.
So
at
this
last
ed
committee
we
had
a
formal
presentation
from
steve
flasch
and
his
development
group,
as
he
referenced
just
a
minute
ago
in
public
comment
of
a
concept
that
they
were
proposing
for
inlet
island.
J
There's
a
lot
of
background
here,
most
relevant
piece
to
what
we're
going
to
talk
about
today
is
they
have
a
preferred
development
and
sponsor
designation
from
the
iura
for
20,
from
going
back
to
2006,
which
led
to
a
proposed
development
project
on
an
island
that
was
not
approved
by
common
council
in
2007
and
there's
been
no
activity
on
few
on
other
subsequent
proposals
since
for
reasons
of
the
global
economy
and
other
reasons
so,
but
they
came
and
gave
us
a
concept
proposal
at
the
ed
committee
just
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
we're
aware
of
at
least
one
other
potential
proposal
in
the
community.
J
There
may
be
others
so,
subsequent
to
the
to
that
meeting,
you
know.
Nelson.
I
had
some
additional
kind
of
conversations.
Nells
kind
of,
I
think,
did
some
additional
work
with
staff
and
with
our
attorney,
and
so
we
think
that
there's
really
kind
of
like
a
a
two-part
project
or
two-part
process
that
we'd
like
to
propose
here
one
is,
is
to
rescind
the
2006
preferred,
developer
and
sponsor
designation.
You
know,
we've
got
an
agreement
here.
That's
14
years
old
recognizes
a
very
different
kind
of
broader
economic
context.
J
J
You
know,
obviously,
which
includes
some
additional
ideas
for
what
we
want
to
see
in
the
in
the
west,
end
inlet,
island
and
waterfront
areas,
and
then
that
would
allow
us
to
then
have
a
more
expanded
issue
of
a
request
for
expressions
of
interest,
just
to
make
sure
that
we
are
providing
opportunity
for
any
interested
parties
to
kind
of
provide
us
the
same
level
of
kind
of
concept,
design
that
we
have
from
from
steve
flash
and
his
group.
J
So
that's
really
the
two
resolutions
that
kind
of
give
you
the
overview
of
the
two
resolutions
in
front
of
you,
so
the
first
would
be
to
rescind
the
2006
agreement,
which
we
could
again.
It
doesn't
we're
not
making
a
judgment
really
on
this
particular
developer
or
their
particular
project.
We're
just
trying
to
kind
of
clean
up
the
paperwork.
J
If
you
would
and
then
we
would
issue
the
rf
rfei
to
get
some
expressions
of
interest
for
that
particular
proposal
on
that
site
and
then
presumably
we
would
then
come
back
and
enter
into
another
preferred
developer
designation,
just
like
we
did
with
the
green
street
parking
garage
so
that
we
could
entertain.
You
know,
obviously
a
negotiated
agreement
with
the
parties,
the
complex
site,
the
iura
owned,
some
of
it.
The
city
actually
owns
some
of
it.
J
So
there's
a
lot
of
complexities
on
that
site,
so
we're
going
to
want
to
make
sure
that
we
take
our
time.
Do
it
right,
but
also
do
it
transparently
provide
opportunities
for
public
comment
and
also
make
sure
that
we're
aligned
with
common
council,
I
think
the
our
our
committee
and
nells
were
quite
aligned
in
the
sense
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
get
to
the
end
of
our
project
potentially
here
and
and
not
have
it
meet
common
council's
needs
for
the
site
as
well.
J
I
Okay,
would
you
do
me
a
favor,
and
would
you
actually
run
the
discussion
because
it's
just
too
hard
for
me
not
being
able
to
see
anybody.
I
can't
see
when
anybody's
upset
or
if,
when
they
have
this
look
on
their
face,
which
means
they
want
a
question
but
they're
but
they're
not
sure
about
it.
Would
you
feel
comfortable
running
the
discussion
on
this.
J
No,
that's
fine
and
I'm
sorry
did.
I
was
there
a
second
from
carl.
I
couldn't
quite
tell.
I
know
your
mic
is
yes,
thank
you,
carl
all
right,
so
I
moved
it
carl's.
Second,
a
bit.
Let
me
first
give
nels
a
chance
to
just
add
any
additional
historical
facts
that
I
blundered
in
the
overview.
C
H
H
H
B
Your
voice
is
breaking
up
a
little
bit,
but
I
think
I
have
the
gist
of
the
question,
which
is
why
wasn't
there
an
automatic
expiration
or
a
date
set
into
an
agreement?
The
ira's
designation
of
a
preferred
developer
or
what
we
call
a
sponsor.
A
foreign
urban
real
project
did
not
include
a
termination
date
because
we
expected
the
termination
date
to
be
linked
into
the
preferred
developer
agreement.
B
The
developer
had
indicated
that
they
plan
to
come
back
and
revise
the
project
to
meet
the
concerns
expressed
by
the
by
the
common
council
that
the
the
vote
of
the
common
council
on
that
preferred
developer
agreement
was
four
to
six.
So
there
was,
it
was
a
close
vote,
so
there
was
a
sense
that
they
would
maybe
be
able
to
make
modifications
and
gain
support
at
common
council.
But
then
the
you
know,
global
fiscal
crisis
occurred
and
things
changed
so
that
that's
the
short
answer.
J
Thanks
carl
other
questions
or
comments,
tracy
or
eric.
E
J
Okay,
so
savant,
I
think
there's
no
other
questions,
so
I
guess
we
could
move
to
a
vote
on
this
one
if
you're
ready.
E
J
Yeah
I
mean
the
idea
is
that
it
would
be
a
little
less
we're
not
doing
a
full
rfp
at
this
stage,
which
is
what
we
did,
which
required
a
much
more
thorough
level
of
effort
on
the
part
of
the
developers.
So
we're
really
trying
to
keep
it
at
this
rfei
level,
which
is
a
much
higher
level
concept
plan
just
so
we
can
get
a
sense
of
what
the
opportunities
are
and
then
we
can
then
decide
kind
of
where
we
want
to
go
from
there.
E
And
although
we've
heard
from
we
know
that
two
there
are
two
potential
developers
interested,
there
may
be
others
too,.
J
E
C
J
The
second
one
is
a
resolution
that
would
just
issue
this
rfei,
so
it
would
authorize
nels
to
kind
of
do
that
process.
We're
recommending
a
60-day
process-
and
you
know
just
also
acknowledges
that
finger
lakes
development,
you
know-
has
already
submitted
a
conceptual
development
plan
and
I
think
we're
saying
would
meet
the
requirements
of
the
rfei.
J
If
I
read
that
correctly,
so
that
we
would
not
need
anything
additional
from
finger
lakes,
development
and
we
would
be
able
to
use
what
they
already
submitted,
but
they
would
be
able
to
submit
revisions
if
I
understand
that
correctly
by
the
deadline.
So
in
other
words
we're
saying
we
heard
you
we've
got
what
it
is,
you
don't
have
to
do
anything
different,
but
in
the
spirit
of
being
equal,
if
they
wanted
to,
you
know,
make
any
revisions
or
update
their
proposal.
They'd
be
welcome
to
do
so.
E
I
J
E
J
C
I
I
I
Big
news:
thank
you
very
much.
We'll
go
now
to
neighbor,
invest.
H
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
mayor.
We
have
a
resolution
to
designate
the
greater
ithaca
activity
center
as
a
community-based
development
organization,
and
this
is
based
upon
their
running
of
the
hospitality
employment
training
program.
This
is
not
the
first
time
that
we've
voted
on
this.
This
is,
I
don't
even
want
to
speculate
three
or
four
times
I
think
gx
been
been,
has
held
his
designation
on
the
pages
after
the
resolution.
H
You'll
find
the
application,
but
also
the
the
review
of
the
application
by
staff,
and
they
have
determined
staff
has
determined
that
gc
does
meet
all
the
qualifications
for
this
designation.
H
So
I'd
like
to
move
that
move
this
resolution
that
gcb
approved
as
a
community-based
development
organization.
E
I
Thanks,
second,
by
tracy,
all
those
in
favor
all
right,
bye.
I
think
that
carries
unanimously.
I
Thank
you
next
actually
hear
me.
I
keep
getting
this.
This
phone
call
keeps
coming
through,
so
I
have
to
take
it
for
just
a
moment
because
it
might
be
public
safety
related,
so
I'll
be
back
with
you,
but
kharim
again,
you
can
go
ahead.
H
Excuse
me:
a
second
resolution
involves
the
emergency
rental
housing
assistance
program
that
is
being
run
by
ithaca
neighborhood
housing
services,
and
these
are
funds
that
came
through
hud
with
for
the
covet
emergency.
The
the
program
is
set
to
expire
december
31
of
this
year.
H
E
G
Because
I'm
right,
sorry,
I'm
sorry,
sorry
I
was
muted.
Do
they
have
an
idea,
any
idea
of
why
it's
taking
so
long?
I
I
I'm
going
to
support
this,
but
I
just
wondered:
if
I
know
we
were
trying
to
figure
this
out
over
the
summer.
You
know
in
august
and
september
and
we
were
surprised,
do
they
have
any
other
ideas?
I
know
there
was.
There
were
some
concerns
that
maybe
this
wasn't
known
broadly
enough.
All
of
that,
but
just
wondered
if
they've
diagnosed
what
the
issue
is.
H
All
right,
well,
I
will
I
will
ask
anissa
to
weigh
in
on
this.
My
sense
is:
that's
part
of
it
just
that
the
need
was
not
as
great
as
was
initially
determined,
but
anissa.
Is
there
something
you'd
like
to
add.
M
Yes,
that's
something
that
I
think
everybody's
been
wondering
about,
but
one
of
the
main
drivers
we
believe
of
what
hasn't
been
drawn
down.
Yet
is
that
in
our
state
either
the
state
moratorium
or
the
federal
moratorium?
Although
they've
been
adjusted
a
couple
different
times,
there's
still,
there's
always
been
one
in
effect,
since
this
program
started
so,
for
example,
the
cdc's
moratorium
is
still
in
effect
right
now
and
ithaca
city
eviction
court.
We
have
indications
that
it
will.
M
It
has
some
cases
on
the
docket
for
the
pre-covered
times,
but
evictions
haven't
started
flowing
through
the
courts
again.
So
one
thought
is
that
people,
because
addictions
are
often
something
that
people
start
dealing
with
when
they
start
getting
notices,
because
it's
very
overwhelming
until
then,
people
have
not
been
getting
notices,
so
that
could
be
one
driver
for
why
we
haven't
seen
it
drawn
down
and
to
your
question
eric
about
publicity
and
and
perhaps
getting
the
word
out
more
broadly.
M
Just
last
week,
leslie
mcbean
from
giac
and
inhs
met.
I
was
invited
to
that
meeting
and
leslie
has.
You
know
identified
that
there
were
several
people
within
g
act
that
that
she
herself
actually
and
gxf
helped
navigate
through
the
inhs
process.
M
So
leslie
is
interested
in
she
met
with
giac
in
order
to
help
facilitate
a
way
that
gx
staff
could
help
people
through
the
process
navigating
the
process
with
inhs,
so
that
there
might
be
a
kind
of
higher
uptake
rate,
and
this,
I
think,
will
be
you
know-
have
very
good
impact
on
the
on
the
program
for
the
city,
but
also
for
the
county,
as
leslie
pointed
out
that
people
do
come
to
giac
for
assistance,
even
if
they
live
outside
the
city.
H
Okay,
well,
I
see
the
mayor's
back,
so
I
may
let
him
take
over
again
we're
ready
for
the
vote.
Mr
mayor
awesome.
H
H
Southern
tier
aids
program
staff,
which
is
in
the
300
block
of
west
state
street,
had
agreed
to
host
two
porta
potties
in
hand,
sanitation
stations
for
the
homeless
population
or
the
homeless,
and
the
population
that
many
of
you
may
have
noticed
tends
to
hang
out
for
one
of
a
better
term
in
that
area.
H
The
committee
could
not
decide
well,
we
agreed
on
the
merits
of
the
proposal.
What
we
could
not
agree
on
was
a
couple
of
things,
one
where
the
stations
might
be
located.
The
proposal
was
to
put
them
in
the
driveway
of
the
building,
and
there
were
concerns
about
the
neighbors.
Having
you
know,
the
the
porta
potties
close
to
the
street
we
proposed,
perhaps
on
the
backside
of
the
building,
which
is
abuts
the
parking
lot
of
dss.
H
The
other
concern
about
that
area
is
that
there
has
been
with
so
many
people
in
that
area.
There's
been
a
lot
of
trash
complaints
from
the
neighbor
neighboring
properties
and
the
desire
that
staff
really
show
a
commitment
to
keeping
the
area
clean,
but
the
additions
of
the
porta
potties
contribute
to
the
trash.
You
know
more
people
coming
around,
and
so
we
had
questions
both
for
the
staff
of
staff
and
also
finding
out
from
the
county
and
dss
whether
the
port
bodies
could
go
on
their
property
or
have
access
across
their
their
property.
H
I
Right
make
sense:
okay.
Well,
I
agree
with
the
wisdom
of
such
a
move,
so
look
forward
to
it
next
month.
Thank
you.
Go
now
to
other
business.
The
action
plan
amendment
to
correct
hud,
funding,
allocation
error.
B
This
is
an
item
that
didn't
go
through
any
committees,
so
we
can
always
bring
it
to
a
committee.
If
you
don't
think
it's
ready
to
go.
Hud
made
an
error
in
their
calculation
of
allocation
amounts,
a
very
small
error.
It
resulted
in
less
than
200
difference
in
our
2020
home
in
cdbg
allocation.
The
problem
is,
we
already
went
through
an
action
plan
process
and
submitted
the
plan
and
have
access
to
the
funding
so
hud
to
correct
this.
B
We
have
to
make
amendments
to
that
approved
and
adopted
plan
to
correct
the
actual
funding
amounts
that
are
are
going
to
be
awarded
in
the
final
analysis
to
the
city.
B
So
you
can
see
in
the
resolution
there's
112
dollars
there
that
will
be
a
reduction
in
the
cdbg
program
for
2020
and
74
dollars
to
to
adjust
our
action
plan
to
match
up
with
the
allocations.
I'm
recommending
that
we
reduce
the
economic
development
loan
fund
project
by
a
hundred
and
twelve
thousand
dollars.
That's
a
project
that
we
project
is
going
to
have
about
255
000
in
it.
So
it's
a
very
modest
change
that
I
don't
think
is
going
to
have
any
material
interest
impact
for
74.
B
We
have
to
actually
look
for
a
project
to
reduce
in
in
that
program
year.
We
only
have
three:
we
have
the
founders
way
for
sale,
town
houses,
the
north
side,
apartments
with,
I
think,
a
housing
authority
and
the
security
deposit
assistance
program,
and
some
of
these
we've
already
issued
funding
award
letters.
So
what
I'm
recommending
is
for
74
dollars?
We
just
allocated
from
ira
internal
funds
to
the
to
to
the
projects
that
we
would
take
74
dollars
away
from
the
security
deposit
program
and
replace
it
with
another
local
source.
B
So
the
program
would
have
the
same
amount
of
funding
and
I
think
it
would
save
us
time
and
probably
money
in
the
long
run
of
not
going
through
a
more
elaborate
process
to
save
74
dollars.
So
it
would
be
a
model.
So
it
would
be
a
non-substantial
amendment
to
our
2020
action
plan
to
again
reduce
the
loan
fund
by
112,
reduce
the
security
deposit
assistance
program
by
74,
but
increase
the
match.
Funding
for
that
program
from
local
ira
funds
with
an
additional
74..
I
Hearing
none
always
in
google.
C
I
B
You
should
have
the
grant
and
the
lease
repayment
reports
for
october
in
your
packet.
The
loan
report.
You
got
required
a
little
additional
information
that
was
just
sent
out
this
morning.
The
long
short
story
on
on
the
loan
repayment
program
is
canopy
is
late
by
one
month.
That's
the
only
change
we've
seen
from
prior
months,
we're
in
touch
with
them
to
find
out
what's
going
on,
but
this
is
the
first
month
they've
been
delinquent
in
three
or
four
months
and
the
grants
programs.
B
We
don't
have
anybody
who's
on
the
high
watch
list.
At
the
moment
it
seems
like
everybody's
moving
forward
with
their
programs.
There
are
some
we're
expecting
some
delays
and
deliveries
from
some
of
the
programs
due
to
the
covet
impacts,
and
we
may
have
to
deal
with
some
additional
extensions
like
the
inhs
one,
but
we're
not
at
a
point
where
anybody
is
at
risk
of
losing
funding,
and
most
programs
are
finding
ways
to
make
make
reasonable
progress
at
this
time.
So
I
will
just
open
it
up
for
any.
D
This
is
laura
nils.
I
have
a
question
on
the
the
grant
summary
sheet.
I
understand
that
in
the
past
it's
been
required.
Certain
percentage
of
funds
might
must
be
expended
by
june
1..
Do
you
anticipate
you
have
any
sense
of
that
being
amended
given
the
pandemic.
B
No,
I
don't
think
that
is
likely
to
be
amended,
it's
possible.
What
they've
done
is
they
have
excluded
the
covet
specific
cares
act,
funding
from
that
calculation,
so
they're
only
tracking
the
regular
allocations
for
that
we're
at
1.8.
We
need
to
get
down
to
1.5.
We've
got
six
more
than
six
months
to
do
that,
so
I
think
we're
in
pretty
good
shape
if
we
have
regular
expenditures
as
we've
seen.
B
I
Okay,
next
chair
report
just
wanted
to
share
that
the
council
has
received
a
put
application
for
college
town.
You
might
have
seen
a
fairly
large,
very
large
project
in
college
town,
some
seven
hundred
thousand
square
feet.
It's
very
interesting
we're
calling
it
an
innovation
district
include
public
benefits
of
improvements
to
the
infrastructure
in
college
town,
as
well
as
a
three
million
dollar
contribution.
I
I
That's
right
all
right,
so
council
that
that
will
you
know
I
thought
that
was
just
of
interest
to
the
agency.
It's
the
very
beginning,
stages
of
the
negotiation
and
and
should
take
months
and
months
laura
any
reporter.
H
I
It
is
it's
it's
the
novar
magazine,
so
the
same
folks
built
college
town
terrace,
so
it
would
be,
would
still
be
taxable,
which
is
good.
The
fear
is
obviously
it's
always
in
college
town
that
the
university
is,
you
know
every
time
they
cross
the
bridge
and
buy
property
that
goes
tax
exempt.
D
Mr
mayor,
do
you
have
a
recollection
on
how
the
college
how
innovation
district
was
named
innovation,
district.
I
I
But
I
am,
I
don't
know
it's
either
that
they
know
and
aren't
saying
or
don't
know,
but
it
I
don't
think
you'd
name
it
an
innovation
district.
Unless
you
had
some
intentions
for
it.
I
What
is
clear
from
their
application
is
that
they
do
think
it'll
be
filled
with
office
workers
that
will
be
present
in
college
town
365
days
a
year,
which
is
of
course
one
of
our
major
goals,
for
that
neighborhood
is
to
to
make
it
active
year
round
instead
of
going
completely
quiet
in
january
and
then
fairly
quiet
in
june
july
august,
but
other
than
that
yeah.
I
guess
we'll
we'll
have
to
pull
that
out
of
the
developer.
D
So
the
project,
as
it
was
explained,
includes
housing
mixed
use.
You
mentioned
office
space,
so
it
it
is
a
very
complex
site.
It
covers
a
significant
portion
of
college
avenue,
so
the
discussions
will
be
ongoing.
There
were
a
number
of
questions
that
came
up
during
this
past
week's
planning
and
economic
development
committee
meeting
with
the
developers
presenting.
D
So
there
are
questions
on
the
proposed
community
benefits,
the
number
of
jobs
that
are
anticipated
and
some
of
the
variances,
especially
around
height
and
density
for
this
college
town
for
the
pud
application.
D
D
There
was
also
approval
at
the
november
4th
meeting
of
the
increase
to
the
community
housing
development
fund.
The
city's
contribution
of
two
hundred
dollars
in
year
number
six
also
voted
on
carpenter
circle
hud
and
that
passed
seven
to
three
the
carpenter
circle,
affordable
housing
unit
or
house,
affordable
housing
building.
I
should
say
still
waiting
on
on
funding.
D
They
did
not
receive
funding
in
the
last
go-round
of
funding,
so
we're
hoping
that
in
their
next
funding
application
they
will
be
receiving
funding
for
that
that
42
units
of
affordable
housing
in
in
this
area
would
be
much
much
much
appreciated.
D
The
application
submitted
has
been
gone
through
some
revisions.
The
team
has
met
with
enterprise
staff
and
we
should
be
receiving
the
full
award
letter
this
week
and
that
is
for
up
to
one
million
dollars
still
working
through
some
of
the
details
on
this.
Specifically,
you
know
who
will
receive
grant
funds.
We've
had
early
indication
that
there
will
be
funding
awarded
to
the
city.
To
our
group,
I
say
to
the
city
and
it's
not
clear
yet
to
whom
the
funds
will
be
awarded.
D
Enterprise
requires
only
one
organization
to
be
receiving
the
funds,
so
this
is
a
very
exciting
project.
It
promises
to
bring
tremendous
benefits
to
some
of
the
most
vulnerable
in
our
community,
so
that
that's
all
good
news
and
we'll
have
more
details
within
a
week
or
so
I
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
add
anything
to
that.
Anisa.
B
Staff
report
just
two
quick
items
under
staff
report:
one
is
the
last
page
in
your
in
your
packet,
which
is
the
list
of
nine
percent
tax
credits.
Projects
that
received
awards,
as
laura
alluded
to
there
are
11
across
the
state.
One
was
founder's
way
by
inhs
at
the
former
immaculate
conception
school
site.
So
that's
great
news.
Those
75
apartments
will
now
receive
funding
and
there'll
be
a
push
to
move
that
project
forward
again.
B
Our
2020
action
plan
included
the
for
sale
units
as
a
separate
funded
component,
and
my
understanding
is,
I
really
want
to
have
a
common
develo
contractor.
Do
both
those
projects
so
looks
like
they're
moving
forward
with
both
of
those
that's
great
news.
The
state
has
taken
to
running
more
cycles
of
the
fund,
so
every
cycle
has
fewer
rewards,
but
there
are
a
few
more
cycles
currently,
although
overall
there's
less
money
than
there
has
been
in
prior
years,
so
the
next
round
is
starting
up
right
away
with
submissions
open
force.
B
I
guess
open
for
submission
for
the
next
round.
Already,
as
laura
alluded
to
carpenter
is
planning
to
resubmit
is
my
understanding.
We
also
have
in
this
next
round
the
inhs
trumansburg
project
will
be
submitting
for
funding,
as
well
as
I
believe,
vism
in
their
500
west
state
street
project
again
about
75
units
is
applying
in
partnership
with
nrp
a
large,
not-for-profit
developer
based
out
of
cleveland.
So
we
will
keep
tracking
on
those
those
those
nine
percent
tax
credit
projects.
B
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
update
you
on
is
the
community
development
block
grant
cv
round
three
funding.
We
had
talked
about
a
process
in
which
we
would
collaborate
with
the
city
on
figuring
out
whether
the
city
budget
would
require
funding
to
support
eligible
programs
as
as
part
of
that
process,
and
then
come
come
back
to
the
city
and
to
the
ira,
with
the
remaining
funds
to
look
at
a
decision
from
the
ira
how
to
proceed
with
with
ones
that
were
not
necessary
to
be
restored
in
the
city
budget
process.
B
So
the
city
budget
does
include
sixty
five
thousand
dollars
of
revenue
for
the
community
outreach
program
in
their
budget
from
the
cdbg
cv
program,
as
well
as
a
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
for
a
variety
of
giac
initiative
programs.
B
So,
in
total
about
two
hundred
forty
thousand
dollars
is
projected
as
revenue
for
the
city
in
the
upcoming
budget
year
to
be
derived
from
the
cdbg
cv,
funding
that
leaves
about
fifty
thousand
dollars
on
allocated.
B
In
addition
to
the
forty
thousand
dollars
we
have
available
from
the
prior
year
or
reallocated
funds,
so
there's
still
about
ninety
thousand
dollars
out
there
available
for
reallocation
or
original
allocation.
I
guess
and
we're
working
on
projects
like
the
one
that
carl
alluded
to
also
working
with
looking
at
initiatives
for
winter
warming,
centers
and
keeping
our
eyes
open
to
see
what
the
demand
will
be
for
rental
assistance.
I
think,
are
three
areas
of
immediate
focus
we're
looking
at,
but
there
may
be
new
needs
emerging.
I
Hearing
none
great
so
the
next
meeting
date
is
christmas
eve
we
meet
then,
depending
on
how
the
virus
goes.
We
all
might
just
doing
nothing
or
we
could
adjust
it
again.
I
As
we
adjusted
this
meeting,
I
would
I
mean
I
heard
even
just
a
couple
things
this
meeting,
that
it
sounds
like
we'll
come
next
month,
so
it
I
don't
think
we
should
cancel
next
month's
meeting.
What
does
the
agency
think
of
meeting
on
monday
again
monday,
the
21st
of.
I
I
It's
okay,
it's
wild!
I
just
went
to
it
thinking
I
was
smart
and,
and
I've
been
outsmarted
once
again,
so
the
so
we'll
we'll
do
monday.
The
21st
instead
of
the.
I
Okay,
well,
just
let
us
know
if
we
fall
below.
I
Moved
by
tracy
is
there
a
second
I'll
assume,
there's
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
I'll,
assume
again
everybody's
in
favor,
and
I
will
get
my
laptop
checked
out
so
next
month.
This
is
easier,
but
thank
you
all
a
lot
accomplish
this
meeting.
Thank
you
very
much
good
to
hear
all
your
voices
I'll
talk
to
you.