►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
A
A
C
C
E
C
C
So
first
I
think
first
things:
first,
is
we
open
the
public
hearing
right?
Is
there
a
motion
to
open
the
public
hearing
moved
by
tracy?
Second,
by
eric
all
those
in
favor
and
the
public
hearing
is
now
open?
Is
anyone
here
to
speak
on
the
public
hearing
on
the
edc
recommendation
link?
Yes,
sir,
you
can
go
ahead
and
unmute
yourself.
F
F
Our
initial
program
was
to
buy
some
of
the
existing
buildings
that
and
businesses
that
were
on
inlet
island
and
through
that
we
developed
kind
of
a
due
diligence
process,
and
I
want
to
apply
this
knowledge
to
this
through
the
other
proposal
and
and
make
it
part
of
the
public
record
of
things
that
we
would
be
looking
for
as
citizens
and
not
presenters
finger
lakes
boating
center.
The
building
during
our
due
diligence.
We
found
that
50
to
60
percent
of
the
support
piles
on
that
building.
F
The
boating
center
had
failed,
75
of
the
metal
roof
panels
were
perforated
and
de
decomposing.
The
new
york
state
canal
corporation
requires
that
all
structures
occupying
their
property
or
easements
or
blue
line
be
safe
and
viable.
We
noted
that
15
to
16
boat
slips
inside
the
building
were
not
usable
for
the
hauling
of
boats.
F
This
has
been
identified
as
a
valuable
asset
to
this
business,
and
yet
this
asset
has
not
been
maintained
it.
It
has
siding
components
and
and
visual
amenities
that
have
been
done
to
the
outside,
but
the
actual
structural
integrity
has
not
been
maintained.
The
estimated
cost
of
this.
This
is
what
I've
done
for
35
years,
plant
operation
and
maintenance
and
building
buildings.
F
The
cost
to
renovate
this
marine
and
make
it
viable
was
1.85
million
dollars
and
what
has
happened
in
the
last
30
years
and
it
happened
with
johnson's
boatyard.
Is
the
cleveland's
made
an
active
decision?
We're
not
going
to
spend
this
money,
we're
going
to
reinvent
our
marina
and
become
a
modern,
marina
footprint
without
metal
buildings,
and
that
is
where
this
is
going
to
end
up?
Is
no
one's
going
to
spend
1.8
million
dollars
so
before
we
throw
solar
panels
on
this
building,
let's
make
sure
that
the
building
is
going
to
stand
up
parking.
F
We've
looked
at
the
parking.
I've
always
said
that
inline
island
is
an
urban
planning
exercise
and
a
challenging
one,
but
one
worth
doing
ithaca's
waterfront
is
a
jewel.
We
only
have
one
we've
got
to
get
it
right.
So
if
we
look
at
the
parking,
if
we
were
to
reinvent
this
marina,
we
can
deliver
another
70
to
85
parking
spaces.
The
marina
can
cohabitate
with
everything
that
we've
proposed,
but
it's
got
to
be
cleaned
up
and
organized
in
an
urban
planning
exercise.
F
Public
access
to
the
water,
I
love
the
boatyard
grill
I've
eaten
more
more
times.
I
can
shake
a
stick
at
in
there.
I
love
to
sit
eat
dinner,
watch
boats
go
by
it's
my
life,
but
the
owners
of
these
businesses
have
used
taxpayers,
money
and
assets
to
support
their
businesses.
It's
supposed
to
go
the
other
way
around,
spend
your
money
to
give
the
public
access
to
the
marina.
I
hear,
kayak
launching
I
hear
canoe
launching
we
started
the
boatyard
grill
with
10
to
12
transient
boat
slips.
F
F
The
rimland
flash
home
tell
we
spent
two
and
a
half
years
studying
cambria
and
the
choice.
Hotel
group
matter
of
fact,
I
think
choice.
Real
estate
came
and
met
with
the
mayor
and
proposed
to
cambria
two
years
ago.
I
want
to
know
more
about
this.
Home
tell
is,
is
jeff
rimland
part
of
this.
We
see
his
name
in
the
cover
letter
is
he
he
is
their
real
estate
and
their
hospitality
guru.
Yet
he
hasn't
been
at
any
of
these
meetings
where.
C
G
G
Yes,
patrick
good
morning,
everyone,
patrick
braga,
vice
president
of
development
for
visum
development
group.
I
want
to
reiterate
that
visum
development
still
believes
that
our
proposal
for
the
inland
islands
site
is
the
most
flexible
and
meets
the
greatest
public
need
in
ithaca,
we're
strong
believers
that
public
land
should
meet
ithaca's
greatest
public
need
and
for
a
city
that
has
documented
struggling
to
provide
affordable
housing
since
the
1980s
for
the
city
to
transfer
such
a
large
parcel
of
land
into
the
into
the
private
sector.
G
H
C
C
E
We
held
basically
an
informational
meeting
at
our
may
session,
where
all
the
developers
were
encouraged
to
attend
present
the
proposal
and
engage
in
dialogue
with
the
committee
and
other
members
who
attended,
which
included
other
members
of
the
iura
and
a
couple
of
members
of
common
council.
Actually
three
members
of
common
council,
I
think,
and
and
then
what
happened
at
the
end
of
that
meeting
is
between
staff
and
the
edc.
We
identified
a
set
of
questions
we
wanted
to
pose
additional
questions.
E
I
think
all
the
committee
members
felt
that
we
had
received
three
very
solid
proposals
that
were
well
thought
through
with
different
concepts
that
we
could
debate
and
so,
while
the
while
the
scoring
kind
of
came
out
this
way
the
scoring
came
out,
I
think
we
felt
that
we
had
three
solid
proposals
and
really
appreciated
the
dialogue
and
kind
of
transparency
we
were
getting
from
each
of
the
developers.
So
in
the
end,
we
we
scored
finger
lakes
development
the
highest.
E
We
then
provided
an
opportunity
for
any
committee
members
to
who
felt
maybe
strongly
about
another
proposal
so
to
make
a
kind
of
subjective
verbal
case.
No
one
felt
that
need
to
do
that.
So
we
went
with
the
scored
results
and
you,
as
you'll,
see
in
the
resolution
identified
a
few
key
considerations
that
we
wanted
to
put
forward
with
this
recommendation
first
to
this
group
and
then
to
common
council
related
to
this
particular
proposal
and
you'll
see
those
in
the
second
resolved.
Thank
you,
charles.
E
You'll
see
that
actually
there
at
the
bottom
of
page
two
of
the
resolution
that
nels
and
I
reviewed
this
week,
which
would
make
things
a
little
bit
clearer
in
terms
of
what
the
next
steps
are
coming
from
here.
So
you
so
you
have
the
resolution
in
your
packet.
It
would
you
know
action
today
would
move
this
forward
to
common
council
for
their
endorsement,
which
would
then
allow
us
to
move
forward
with
transfer
of
land
from
the
city
to
con
to
iura
and
allow
us
to
move
forward
with
an
exclusive
development
agreement.
E
But
that's
our
committee's
recommendation.
The
value
of
this
conversation
here
is
to
explore
additional
questions
that
agency
members
may
have
and
perhaps
come
to
a
different
conclusion
based
on
the
criteria.
So
with
that
I'll,
of
course,
as
always,
we'll
check
with
nells
on
any
of
the
details
and
then
pass
it
back
to
you.
Svontek
for
discussion.
B
A
Well,
that
issue
was
actually
discussed
a
bit
at
the
economic
development
committee
meeting
when
the
edc
asked
each
of
the
members
if
they
were
open
to
down
scaling
their
project
and
each
one
of
them
said
that
they
could
accommodate
a
downscaling.
If
that
was
necessary,
with
the
understanding
that
there
would
there
be
less
financial
resources
to
potentially
address
some
of
the
public
benefits.
B
A
B
D
B
C
A
Well,
I
mean
it's,
it's
a
it's
about
a
two
and
a
quarter
acre
site
and
it
would
incorporate
you
know
on
the
project
site.
There
would
be
parking,
an
affordable
housing
project
of
you
know,
somewhere
around
50
to
60
units
as
and
then
the
home
tell
concept
with
somewhere
around
75
or
80
units
in
that
project.
A
So
I
don't
know
it's
a
five-story
zoning
location
and
we
have
heard
in
the
past
where
the
poor
soils
really
do
require
projects
to
either
be
keep
it
very
low
and
lightweight
one
two-story
kind
of
style
or
try
to
maximize
the
height
and
and
shrink
the
footprint
where
you
need
a
foundation
on
it.
This
would
be
consistent
with
the
waterfront
zoning
in
the
west
end
in
terms
of
the
zoning.
A
E
Yeah
I
mean
I
can't
speak
to
the
statistics.
I
think
your
question
is
really
good
once
and
I
think
when
we
were
talking
with
fld,
which
has
inhs
as
a
partner.
I
I
think
we
were
talking
about
this,
the
housing
component
being
roughly
similar
in
terms
of
the
components
of
210
hancock
in
terms
of
the
rental
units
there,
but
maybe
joe
can
speak
to
that
a
little
bit
more.
E
You
know
my
concern
has
less
than
about
like
total
density.
I
I
think
you
know
your
comparisons.
There
are
not
quite
perfect
slander,
because
the
challenges
to
me
there
are
access
right,
there's
just
that
one
pretty
much
kind
of
narrow
access
onto
the
island,
whereas
you
know
comparing
it
to
say
the
density
of
fall,
creek
or
downtown.
You've
got
multiple
access
points
right,
so
you've
got
one
access
point
from
a
transportation
and
parking
point
of
view,
and
I
think
that
has
been
one
thing.
That's
been
on
my
mind:
it's
like
maybe
per
acre.
E
It's
tot,
it's
fine,
but
is
it
more
complicated?
When
you
look
at
the
access,
the
diversity
of
use,
is
there
and,
and
can
those
diversity
of
uses
be
compatible
or
are
they
in
conflict
and
again
that
relates
to?
When
is
there
different
types
of
density
on
that
particular
piece
of
land,
and
then
I
think
somewhat
some
speakers
and
and
commenters
have
also
then
sort
of
talked
about
the
sort
of
visual
density
and
the
visual
density
on
the
waterfront,
and
that
could
be
a
legitimate
concern.
E
I
mean,
I
think,
we're
all
used
to
seeing
a
very
open
space
there.
You
know
with
the
parking
lot
and
the
boat
storage
and
it
is
going
to
look
different
once
you
put
the
hotel
and
but
that's
going
to
be
true,
no
matter
which
development
proposal
we
go
for
so
unless
we
decide
to
down
scale
this
considerably.
E
Any
of
these
proposals
are
going
to
make
use
of
several
stories
of
development
and
a
compact
plan,
and
typically
that's
what
we
would
want
to
see
in
the
city
of
it,
because
we
would
want
to
see
you
know
an
urban
compact
plan.
You
know,
I
think
the
key
will
be.
How
does
any
proposal
that
we
move
forward
work
with
the
planning
board
and
other
agencies
in
the
city
to
ensure
really
good
sight
lines?
Visual
appeal,
high
quality
of
materials,
the
continued
public
access?
E
You
know
the
25
foot
easement,
the
det
has
the
waterfront
trail.
You
know
those
are
going
to
be
complex
puzzle
pieces
that
you
know,
I
think,
are
going
to
require
a
lot
of
ongoing
discussion
as
it
gets
to
the
planning
board,
as
we
saw
with
the
green
street
garage
project
like
we
approved
a
concept
and
that
concept
needed
to
adjust
and
change
based
on
the
needs
of
the
location,
other
property
owners.
E
I
I
D
Am
I
still
in
well
yeah?
Okay,
then
this
will
allow
that
to
con.
Allow
us
to
continue
to
operate.
Additionally,
we
are
also
changing
our
model
a
bit
and
some
of
the
larger
boats.
Well,
the
market
is
changing.
The
economics
are
changing
a
little
bit
towards
smaller
boats,
which
are
easier
to
move
away
from
here
and
take
up
less
space,
and
some
of
the
larger
boats
will
have
to
go
up
the
lake.
We
recognize
that
and
that's
that's
a
process.
That's
already
started
in
our
customer
base.
C
I
C
I
wouldn't
personally
be
supportive
of
of
going
backwards
or
or
down
zoning
or
or
seeking
smaller
buildings
on
the
site,
not
just
because
the
economics,
but
you
know
I
I
think
we
have
an
opportunity
to
to
put
people
on
the
island
and
the
waterfront.
I
think
that's
a
good
thing.
It
actually
does
not
strike
me
as
an
overwhelming
amount
of
people
or
an
overwhelming
density,
even
chris's
point,
which
is
a
good
one
about
access.
C
D
C
J
B
I
shared
okay,
I
do
share
concerns,
as
you
stated
them,
carl
about
the
scale
of
the
development
here.
I
feel
like
it's
trying
to
be
so
many
things
in
such
a
space
and
five
stories
is
just
one
of
them.
I
you
know
once
it's
done
it's
done
and
I
would
not
be
adverse
to
maybe
waiting
and
looking
again
I
mean
once
we
put
things
in
our
what's
it
called
an
rf.
B
K
K
I'm
supportive
of
this
one,
I'm
supportive
of
the
ud
committee's
decision-
and
you
know
my
I
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
we
don't
have
public
access
that
de
facto
feels
more
private,
like
we
have
had
in
the
past
on
the
island
where
there's
at
the
tip
of
the
island
on
the
north
end,
I
think
I
hope
back
directionally.
I've
got
that
right.
You
know
you
have
a
public
park
that
doesn't
feel
like
a
public
park.
That's
where
I
think
it's.
K
K
So
that's
that's
all
I
had
to
say
the
only
other
piece
I
think
I
know
the
answer
to
this
is
the
conditions
in
the
resolution
that
were
listed.
The
three
conditions
that
the
ed
committee
put
in.
I
those
have
to
be
met
before
does
council
get
to
set
when
those
conditions
are
going
to
be
met
or
do
they
have
to
be
met
before
council?
K
C
A
Yeah
those
conditions
are
part
of
the
project
as
it
moves
forward
if
it's
going
to
gain
ultimate
iua
approval
and
common
council
approval,
so
they
the
development
project,
has
to
incorporate
those
things
into
its
proposal
as
it
moves
forward
reminding
folks
again,
this
is
really
a
conceptual
level.
You
know,
so
the
details
have
to
be
worked
out
and
and
just
one
other
note,
the
rfbi
did
not
establish
any
minimum
or
guidance
on
you
know,
height
or
density.
What
it
did
talk
about
is
maximizing
public
benefit
and
the
develop.
A
You
know
the
respondents
interpreted
what
that
would
mean,
realizing
that
there's
a
brownfield
and
there's
you
know,
there's
interest
in
expanding
public
access
and
physical
public
infrastructure
improvements.
So
and
again
I
guess
the
other
thing
is,
I
guess
all
three
of
the
you
know.
The
respondents
indicated
they're
willing
to
look
at
incremental
modifications
or
maybe
even
more
dramatic
scaling
issues
so
that
I
think,
if,
if
the
issue
is
incremental,
you
know
in
terms
of
if
the
home
tell,
for
example,
in
this
project
was
35
units
rather
than
75
units.
A
H
H
That
parcel
in
the
northside
neighborhood
is
a
two-acre
lot
and
there
were
concerns
expressed
by
some
residents
about
the
scale
how
a
five-story
building
would
fit
into
the
neighborhood,
and
I
felt
at
the
time
that
we
had
a
wonderful
opportunity
to
design
this
and
make
use
for
housing
of
this
two
acre
parcel
of
land.
The
fact
that
inlet
island
is
a
2.5
acre
parcel.
H
It
does
seem
to
me
that
a
five-story,
affordable
housing
building
is
appropriate
for
this
this
land.
I
know
that
there
are
people.
My
colleagues,
some
colleagues
on
common
council
will
not
agree
with
that.
However,
I
think
our
housing
needs
are
such
that
we
should
work
to
take
advantage,
as
we
did
with
210
hancock,
take
advantage
of
available
space
for
the
best
public
benefit,
and,
in
this
case,
in
particular
the
affordable
housing
component.
H
E
Yeah,
so
I
want
to
say
a
little
bit
more.
Thank
you
laura.
I
think
that
point
about
210
hancock
and
how
it
fit
into
the
northside
neighborhood
and
how
I
think
it's
become
a
really
vibrant
place
with
lots
of
people
living
there
and
it's
fit
in
really
well.
I
think
you
really
have
proposed.
So
thank
you
yeah
a
couple
more
thoughts,
just
on
density
in
the
waterfront,
you
know
well,
I
think
we're
all
very
much
aware
that
our
waterfront
is
transforming
very
quickly
and
something
that
has
been
talked
about
for
decades.
E
It's
finally,
now
at
a
point
where,
over
the
next
five
years,
several
projects
are
going
to
come
online,
potentially
including
this
one
and
our
waterfront
will
be
very
different
and-
and
what
happens,
I
think,
is
when
something
that
has
been
conceived
of
for
20
years
or
longer.
God
knows
how
long
going
on
maybe
30
or
40
years,
so
they
all
come
to
kind
of
happen
very
fast.
E
That
said,
my
concern
about
density
is
not
so
much
about
the
height
of
the
buildings.
On
that
particular
parcel.
You
know
I
think
it
is
about
you
know:
how
can
we
get
people
in
and
out
of
there
and
a
mix
of
people
residents
long-term
extended
stay
if
the
hotel
concept
moves
forward
and
then
short-term
people
who
are
using
the
restaurant
or
using
the
voting
center
etc?
E
But
I
think
there
are
good
minds
on
the
planning
board
and
zoning
a
board
of
appeals
and
building
department,
and
I
think
we
will
come
to
the
right
resolution
on
that.
I
think
in
terms
of
the
public
access.
I
think
it's
a
really
important
point
that
others
have
made,
including
eric
today
and
the
one
of
the
reasons
I
was
not
in
favor
of
the
vision
project
is
we
have
a
lot
of
public
park
and
open
space
on
our
waterfront?
That's
actually
not
a
problem
that
this
city
has.
E
We
have
this
great
access
for
the
waterfront
trail,
which
is
only
going
to
get
better
as
we
extend
the
floral
avenue
trail
across
the
inlet
and
into
the
southwest
right
and
in
all
of
my
experience
in
the
before
covert
period
of
traveling
a
lot.
I
travel
to
a
lot
of
waterfront
cities,
many
of
them
oceanfront,
but
a
lot
of
them
lakefront
as
well,
and
the
ones
that
seem
to
work
for
me
are
not.
The
ones
are
not
an
issue
of
density
of
development
it
to
me
it's
always
been
the
issues
of
connectivity
right.
E
E
I
don't
think
we
need
a
massive
public
park
to
be
able
to
do
that.
I
think
we
have
some
of
the
components
on
there.
Connectivity
is
key
and
then
the
last
thing
I'll
say
is
you
know
my
experience
when
I
was
on
council
is,
I
remember,
walking
through
the
west
end,
because
I
get
my
haircut
at
gary's
barbershop
and
feeling
that
wow
there's
so
much
here.
E
Of
course,
you
know,
except
there's,
no
people
living
here
and
even
since
my
time
on,
council
right,
we've
seen
the
development
of
various
condos
and
apartments
and
a
number
of
other
parcels
on
the
island,
and
this
is
another.
You
know
piece
in
that
puzzle
and
link-
has
another
project
going
on
down
there
for
housing,
we're
finally
going
to
get
to
the
point
where
it
can
be
a
neighborhood
there's
going
to
be
people
living
there
and
a
whole
bunch
of
other
amenities.
E
You
know
convenience
stores,
restaurants,
groceries,
transportation,
that's
everything
we
would
want
when
you
think
about
the
broader
island,
not
just
this
parcel,
but
the
broader
island,
the
broader
west
end
it's
actually
going
to
be
restored
as
a
neighborhood
as
it
was
before.
The
flood
control
channel
project
came
through
with
the
corps
of
engineers.
So
that's
a
number
of
other
positive
elements,
and
it's
not.
E
K
Actually
I
mean
laura
and
chris
have
articulated
so
much
really
good
points.
I
I
did
visit
the
island
again.
I
walked
by
210
hancock
every
morning.
I
remember
those
debates.
All
of
that.
I
think
everything
that
was
said
is
well
put
and
chris
your
point
about
lifting
up
connectivity
over
everything
else,
so
that
what
you
feel
and
experience
comes
next,
I
think,
is-
is
really
insightful.
Very,
very
good
point.
K
So
this
is
what
I
was
really
excited
about
with
the
entire
process
and
I
think
in
the
end
you
know
this
is
certainly
not
going
to
be.
This
is
going
to
be
a
huge
factor
in
making
sure
that
that
particular
scenario
doesn't
happen,
but-
and
I
understand
that
that
would
have
happened
with
the
other
projects
too,
but
I
I'm
particularly
excited
about
the
partnership
with
inhs,
so
the
comparison
210
hancock
has
a
special
resonance,
but
that's
it.
B
It's
very
helpful
for
me
to
hear
this
compared
to
the
hancock
street
development,
because
I
do
like
that
development.
I
think
it
fits
well.
I
don't
like
the
yellow,
but
that's
a
whole
different
story.
I
do
think
it
fits
well,
and
I
think
it's
also
helpful
to
hear
chris
talk
about
the
connectivity
that
that's
what
makes
it
feel
the
right.
B
You
know
you
can
see
big
developments
on
waterfronts,
but
if
you
feel
like
you
can
walk
in
there
and
walk
by
them
and
do
things
there.
That
is
a
whole
different
feeling.
So
I
and
I
really
appreciate
what
eric's
been
saying
about.
You
know,
let's
not
make
a
public
space
that
feels
private.
I
think
those
are
two
really
big
things
that
are
important
here.
B
I
I
The
second
comment
is,
I
remember
when
we
were
thinking
about
the
the
project
next
to
city
hall,
affordable
housing-
and
I
don't
remember
quite
remember
who
said
this,
but
we
were
told
that
that
project
the
city
would
not
support
that
much
public
housing
that
you
know
that
that
project
would
not
be
able
to
find
the
people
within
that
income
range,
because
it
was
just
too
much
development
for
that.
You
know
folks
of
that
income
range.
I
So
it's
interesting
that
now
we're
having
more
public
or
housing
for
lower
income,
low
and
moderate
income
people,
and
then
the
question
I
have
is
in
the
resolution.
There
are
the
three
conditions
and
the
first
condition
says
the
developer
will
share
the
cost
of
any
environmental
cleanup.
Does
that
actually
share
means
disclose?
Am
I
correct.
I
Well,
yeah
because
cher
mean
I
wasn't
sure
if
it
was
saying
that
you
know
it
was
going
to
be
a
city
developer,
partnership
to
pay
for
the
environmental
cleanup
or
if
it
was
just
saying,
find
out
what
the
what
the
cost
will
be
and
then
disclose
that.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
understood
the
purpose
of
that
sentence.
Good
question.
A
Yeah,
I
believe
the
intent
is
a
financial
component
for
the
developer
that
figure
lakes
developments
proposal
proposes
that
they
will
pay
for
the
cost
of
of
the
investigation
and
the
remediation,
but
they
will
offset
that
against
the
purchase
price
of
the
of
the
land
to
be
acquired
so
essentially
they'll
take
on
the
responsibility
and
the
liability
and
the
cash
up
front.
You
know
to
do
it,
but
then
the
purchase
price
for
the
land
will
be
impaired
by
that
by
that
cost
and
reduced
it's
an
offset.
A
H
C
C
I
had
a
slightly
different
ranking
than
what
the
ed
committee
came
up
with,
but
I've
learned
I
mean
I
like
I
like
the
one
you
chose,
especially
as
eric's
comments
that
the
inhs
as
an
anchor
was
a
really
really
big
point
in
their
favor.
I
I've
also
just
learned
the
that
when
you
have
a
group
of
really
smart
people
like
we
have
on
the
ed
committee
and
they've
spent
months
on
the
process
and
the
process
itself
is
very
sound
and
the
rubric
for
decision
making
is
very
sound.
C
I've
learned
the
hard
experience
over
many
long
rules,
or
maybe
it's
a
long
experience
over
many
hard
years
to
trust
it
to
trust
that
process
and
because
every
time
I
think,
I'm
smarter
than
the
group
I'm
wrong.
The
group
ends
up
being
right
and
I
was
wrong
so
you
know
I
would.
I
feel
comfortable
moving
this
forward
to
council.
E
So
thank
you
for
your
trust,
cevante.
I
think
it
is
also
important,
like
the
more
voices
the
better.
So
I
think
it
is.
This
is
a
good
opportunity.
If
people
do
feel
differently
about
the
ranking
that
you
know,
I
think
there's.
I
think
the
committee
would
welcome
additional
viewpoints.
I
mean,
I
think
you
know
it.
It's
as
charlotte
said
you
know
we're
a
small
group
of
volunteers,
so
certainly
people
who
think
about
this
all
the
time
we
you
know
if
anyone
has
and
wants
to
advocate
for
one
of
the
other
ones.
E
C
Thank
you
very
much.
I
want
to
thank
and
appreciate,
bissem
and
and
link
in
the
waterfront
alchemy
folks.
You
know,
especially
what
link
and
his
crew
have
been
doing
over.
There
has
brought
a
lot
of
life
to
the
island.
It's
been.
You
know
the
first
major
improvements
in
in
many
years,
and
I
hope
that
doesn't
stop
right.
I
mean
I'm
not
sure
anything
could
stop
like
anyway,
but
I
hope
that
this
decision
doesn't
stop
them
from
moving
forward
and
making
investments
in
our
in
our
community
all
right.
C
A
Sure-
and
this
was
added
to
the
very
bottom
of
the
meeting
packet,
if
you
went
on
to
the
website
to
pull
it
down,
I
don't
think
it
was
in
the
original
packet
we're
moving
closer
and
closer
to
starting
construction
on
the
green
street
garage
urban
renewal
project.
Vesino
is
the
developer.
Developing
the
western
sections
closest
to
city
hall,
rimland
and
ithaca
properties
is
working
on
the
eastern
section
and
with
the
bonds
that
have
been
priced
at
a
good
interest
rate
are
scheduled
to
close
on
june
30th.
A
A
We
called
this
in
the
the
dda
required
that
there'll
be
a
mitigation
plan
in
place
and
that
the
ira
approved
that
and
we'd
very
much
like
to
get
that
in
place
prior
to
construction,
starting
they're,
not
to
say
that
there
hasn't
been
a
lot
of
work
on
this
issue
behind
the
scenes.
But
formalizing
it
into
a
plan
is
what
this
is
really
bringing
forth
here,
and
it's
now
never
been
vetted
really
with
the
ira.
A
What
has
been
working
in
the
past
has
been
working,
the
planning
board
and
the
staff
of
the
city
on
mitigating
the
impacts.
There's
been
negotiations
with
each
of
the
adjacent
property
owners
on
impacts
to
the
right-of-way,
which
is
shared
by
a
lot
of
businesses,
that
front
of
the
commons
going
through
the
area
and
and
a
lot
of
work
to
discuss.
A
So
what
you
should
have,
what
you
see
in
your
packet
will
be
is
a
resolution
that
does
two
things
one
is
it.
It
looks
at
the
mitigation
plan
and
suggests
approval,
and,
secondly,
it
designates
facino
as
a
spokesperson
for
the
ira
to
communicate
with
all
the
different
stakeholders
and
adjacent
property
owners
about
the
construction
project.
Vesino
has
control
of
you
know,
they're
hiring
the
contractor.
They
know
the
construction
process,
they
can
mitigate
issues,
whereas
the
ira
really
is
is
it's.
A
You
know,
we'd
have
to
then
go
to
vasino
and
ask
them
to
make
changes
where
they
can
do
it
directly.
It
doesn't.
It
doesn't
have
a
step
out
of
the
picture,
but
it
just
provides
them
as
the
front
the
front
face
for
the
project
for
addressing
construction
phase
impacts
during
the
two-year
process
for
construction
and
then
so
that
so
step
one
is
the
mitigation
plan
and
step
two
is,
is
authorizing
them
to
be
a
spokesperson
for
the
agency,
which
we
have
already
been,
which
they've
already
been
acting.
A
They've
set
up
a
website
that
all
the
stakeholders
have
access
to
for
for
updates
on
the
project.
They
posted
one
just
the
other
day
on
their
on
their
proposed
schedule,
and
the
other
thing
important
to
note
here
is
that
the
the
budget
for
the
project
does
include
a
mitigation
fund,
should
there
be
adverse
impacts
that
can
be
addressed
that
can
be
used
to
address
those
impacts.
A
So
they
moved
back
to
a
more
conventional
cast
in
place,
concrete,
like
you've,
seen
developed
for
all
of
our
other
parking
garages
where
they'll
be
cement
trucks
pumping
concrete,
but
they
won't
be
obstructing
the
road.
It
also
means
that
there's
not
as
much
weight
at
any
one
time
above
the
cinema,
so
the
cinema
can
continue
to
operate
throughout
the
entire
process.
A
So
we
a
lot
of
the
initial
concerns
was
what
would
happen
if
synopsis
had
to
be
temporarily
displaced
and
I'm
happy
to
report.
That's
not
a
requirement
of
the
construction
project.
So
really
so
that's
that's.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
people
understood
that
there
is
no
displacement
of
the
cinema
and
then
you'll
see
attached
to
this,
as
part
of
this
plan
are
a
lot
of
their
logistical
plans
for
how
pedestrians
can
move
around
the
site
and
and
also
some
temporary
detour
signage
for
pedestrians.
A
At
all
times,
the
front
entrance
to
the
cinema
will
be
available
for
customer
access
and
employee
access.
But
to
tell
you
the
truth,
it
will
be
via
that
crosswalk
from
green
street.
You
come,
you
know.
For
the
most
part,
the
easiest
way
to
get
to
the
cinema
will
be
on
green
street
across
at
the
activated
crosswalk
that
is
kind
of
at
the
extension
of
home
dairy
alley
and
lead
you
into
the
entrance.
A
A
A
Having
said
that,
sinopolis
has
been
and
come
attended.
Several
of
the
meetings
of
the
common
council
in
the
ira
on
this
issue
have
expressed.
Support
for
the
project
generally
have
been
are
included
in
the
the
linkage
that
that
casino
provides
for
construction
updates
and
impacts,
and
has
indicated
and
and
we've
talked
about
making
sure
that
the
construction
phase
accommodates
their
needs.
A
For
example,
there's
a
hanging
sign
in
the
in
the
home
dairy
extension
alley,
which
says
sinapolis
when
you
look
from
the
commons
that
will
be
relocated
during
the
construction
phase
to
make
sure
we
don't
lose
that
signage
for
them
and
and
really
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
to
time.
Construction
activity
to
be
at
alternate
hours
from
their
operating
hours,
so
essentially
they
kind
of
get
going
around
4
30
in
the
afternoon.
The
construction
winds
down
at
3
30
in
the
afternoon
and
the
the
developer
will
make
sure
that
the
construction
does
not.
C
E
No,
I
mean
we've
been
obviously
focused
primarily
on
inland
islands.
You
know
real
report.
I
just
want
to
echo
what
you
said
sante
about
you
know
the
quality
of
all
three
of
the
proposals
and
and
really
each
of
them,
bringing
something
creative
and
interesting
that
really,
I
think,
enriched
the
whole
discussion.
So,
just
again,
it's
a
reinforcement
of
these
processes.
While
they
take
time
have
you
know
multiple
benefits,
not
just
you
know,
having
transparent
process,
but
also
the
ability
to
generate
new
ideas.
So
thank
you
for.
H
C
I
I
I
I
I
I
There
are
some
changes
in
the
ability
of
some
of
learning,
web's
clients
to
be
able
to
move
and
so
to
move
out
of
the
current
apartments
that
are
supported
by
this
plan
by
the
housing
scholarship
program.
There's
one
young
person
in
particular,
who
has
been
successful
but
is
having
some
issues
in
terms
of
finding
new
housing
and
so
learning
web
has
requested
that
the
contract
be
modified
from
an
18-month
term
to
a
24-month
term
again
as
allowed
by
hud.
C
C
I
Primarily
personnel
has
not
been
running
the
summer,
but
the
needs
for
lunch.
Support
for
laundry
needs
has
been
strong
and
so
oers
requested
that
we
shift
three
thousand
dollars
that
were
set
aside
for
to
support
students
in
their
internet
usage,
be
shifted
to
the
laundry
program
which
supports
all
their
clients
in
getting
well,
it's
obvious
getting
laundry
for
laundry
services.
So
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
allow
that
this
contract
modification
to
shift
three
thousand
dollars
from
internet
support
to
laundry
needs.
I
I
The
agency
decided
at
our
last
meeting
that
the
ni
committee
would
take
a
look
at
this
funding
and
make
a
recommendation
of
how
those
extra
funds
would
be
used.
We
considered
a
couple
of
projects
that
were
economic
development
projects
that
were
not
fully
funded.
One
was
http
gx
housing,
I'm
sorry,
hospitality,
employment,
training
program,
which
was
not
fully
funded.
I
hutp
had
requested
a
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars
and
we
had
funded
it
at
hundred
100
three
dollars.
I
The
other
project
was
a
fingerless
reuse
and
they
had
requested
a
hundred
and
six
thousand
nine
hundred
thirty
seven
dollars.
We
have
funded
it
at
ninety
thousand
dollars.
The
committee
decided
to
recommend
that
the
extra
funding.
I
should
note
that
twenty
percent
of
the
funds,
or
a
little
over
two
thousand
dollars,
will
go
towards
administration,
so
we're
actually
talking
about
eight
thousand
twenty
25
and
some
change.
I
J
I
No,
the
only
thing
I
will
say
is
that
we
had
planned
to
meet
with
dietrich
the
executive
director
of
oar,
but
she
was
unable
to
make
our
meeting,
so
we
will
request
that
she
meet
with
the
committee,
probably
at
our
next
july
meeting.
We
just
want
to
talk
to
her
about
how
things
are
going
with
the
college
initiative.
Upstate
program
explore
the
issue
of
the
the
needs
for
laundry,
because
our
initial
thought
was
wow.
I
A
Yeah,
you
have
the
the
grant
summary
the
loan
report
and
the
lease
report.
Actually
those
last
two
it
looks
like
you
have
twice
in
your
in
your
packet,
but
they're
duplicates
in
terms
of
the
grants
we
we
did
accomplish
our
spend
down
goal
of
no
more
than
1.5
45
days
before
the
what,
by
the
end
of
may
so
we're
in
good
stead
with
hud
regulations
in
terms
of
expenditures.
We
do
want
to
keep
tracking
on
a
couple
of
projects
that
were
monitoring
more
closely.
A
To
make
sure
we
continue
to
have
spend
down
on
progress.
The
inhs
emergency
rental
assistance
program
is
still
we're
still
tracking
that
one
they
indicate
that
they
have
commitments
in
place
to
expend
the
full
funds,
but
because
those
commitments
are
forward-based
for
future
rents,
they
still
have
not
been
able
to
voucher
all
those
funds
yet
and
it'll
take
a
few
months
to
work
through
that
process.
A
But
we
think
that
that
is
going
to
work
out
in
the
end,
we're
also
working
through
the
documentation
for
the
small
business
resiliency
fund,
which
afc
was
very
supportive
of
to
implement
that
program
and
front
the
funds
to
the
businesses.
We're
now
reimbursing
afcu,
I
think
we've
got
about
50
percent
of
that
reimbursement
in
place
and
working
through
a
couple
of
documentation
issues
with
their
staff.
A
I
think
what
the
projects
we're
going
to
keep
an
eye
on
in
the
future
for
spend
on
are
going
to
be
those
economic
development
projects,
hgtp
and
finger
lakes.
Reuse
have
are
just
now
tapping
into
their
2019
funds
or
yeah.
They
still
have
2019
funds.
We
also
have
funding
for
those
programs
in
2020,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
those
are
are
being
vouched
to
us
on
a
timely
basis.
A
A
And
if,
if
done,
I
would
just
go
to
the
the
loan
report
and
indicate
well,
there
were
two
red
lines
on
the
loan
repayment
report
with
green
star
and
I
think
a
downtown
associates.
The
canopy
green
star
is
fully
in
in
compliance
now
that
was
a
little
timing
issue
in
terms
of
their
payments
were
being
received
late,
as
was
their
billing
actually
and
for
the
canopy
they
are
currently
making
payments
month
by
month.
A
But
from
about
four
months
ago,
we
have
a
a
holdover
payment
of
of
a
couple
hundred
dollars
that
we're
trying
to
work
out
with
the
loan
processor.
So
really
they're
they've
been
current
since
that
time
and
are
making
regular
payments.
We
just
have
to
work
through
a
back
a
back
issue
and
work
that
out,
so
I
don't
have
any
worries
about
the
repayment
on
that
one.
Likewise,
on
our
lease
repayment
reports,
we
show
a
couple
of
past
dues.
J
In
response
to
that,
I
have
reached
out
to
them.
They
were
pretty
late
on
starting
their
project
because
they,
their
organizational
hierarchy,
is
very
complex
and
needs
to
go
through
many
different
levels
of
approval
to
get
things
rolling
there.
So
we
received
our
first
quarterly
report
from
them
last
quarter
and
they'll
be
turning
one
in
at
the
end
of
june
as
well.
It
will
arrive
in
july,
so.
A
One
quick
item
to
note
is
that
the
anissa
did
great
work
to
submit
the
action
plan
to
hud
on
time.
So
after
the
council
endorsed
it,
it
has
been
submitted.
So
we
are
now
waiting
for
the
45
day
period
for
hud
to
review
the
2021
action
plan.
You
know
that,
with
the
with
the
coveted
funding,
there's
been
a
lot
of
work
for
submissions
of
plans,
so
I
really
appreciate
anissa's
work
to
meet
the
deadlines
imposed
to
get
those
those
submissions
completed.
A
We
did
discuss
earlier
with
anissa.
She
has
is
ready
to
discuss
and
provide
an
update
on
the
enterprise
funding
and
the
mayor's.
You
know
mayor's
guaranteed
income
programs
and
the
status
of
those
programs
if
you're
interested-
but
I
know
you
have
you're
trying
most
of
the
members
are
trying
to
leave
soon.
That's
a
report
that
could
come
at
a
future
meeting
if
you
prefer,
or
we
could
try
to
squeeze
it
in
now
from
a
nissa.
C
J
A
J
Yeah,
it's
just
a
brief
report
and
might
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
or
you
know,
go
into
further
depth
next
time
if
people
are
interested.
So
the
official
name
of
this
project
is
the
addiction.
I'm
sorry.
The
ithaca
eviction
displacement
defense
project,
it's
a
pretty
multi-faceted
project
with
a
broad
spectrum
of
services,
starting
from
very
low
touch
services,
supporting
the
tenants
rights,
housing,
hot,
the
tenants
rights
hotline
which
just
for
a
little
clarification,
so
that
does
sit
kind
of
within
itu
structure.
J
So
that's
kind
of
the
lightest
touch
part
of
the
spectrum,
where
it's
really
just
a
resource
that
tenants
can
call
to
find
out
basic
information
and
if
they,
if
the
person
answering
the
phone
understands
that
they
have
a
more
complex
issue,
then
they
can
access
higher
levels
of
service
within
our
project.
Everything
from
brief
advice:
that
is
they
the
fact
pattern
is
taken
law
students,
look
it
over
discuss
with
their
practicum
advisor
and
come
back
later
with
an
answer
to
that
person.
J
If
there's
something
within
that
person's
situation,
that
appears
that
it's
going
to
need
legal
representation,
then
full
scope,
legal
representation,
can
be
offered.
Those
three
things
are
something
very
new
in
our
environment
in
terms
of
people
who
are
potentially
facing
eviction
being
able
to
get
greater
access
to
legal
representation.
J
Other
facets
are
increasing
the
with
la
new
york,
increasing
the
number
of
pro
bono
attorneys
available
locally
to
represent
people
who
will
end
up
in
eviction
court.
So
there's
a
funding
piece
for
that.
There's
a
funding
piece
for
a
law,
fellow
who
will
be
working
on
both
of
those
projects
and
then
cornell
law
school.
Once
the
the
student
chapter
of
the
national
lawyers
guild
will
be
monitoring
eviction
court
once
eviction
court
starts
again
as
observers.
J
This
is
based
on
a
project
that
happened
in
new
orleans
that
found
when
there
are
observers
in
court
outcomes
were
better
for
people
who
are
facing
eviction
and
the
court
monitors
will
assist
in
building
a
database
for
us
to
understand
locally
how
how
many
evictions
are
happening?
Who
are
the
people
who
are
being
evicted?
Where
are
they
living
things
like
that?
There's
actually
no
central
place
where
that
information
is
collected
in
ithaca
and
that's
not
uncommon
across
york,
new
york
state,
because
the
office
of
court
administration
does
not
require.
H
J
But
through
our
through
some
independent
analysis
of
2018
eviction
cases,
we
found
some
alarming
patterns
that
make
us
feel
that
this
database
is
very
important
and
then
the
highest
kind
of
touch
service
of
this
program
is
called
the
housing
stability
and
support
program.
This
would
pay
provide
direct
cash
payments
to
people
who
are
housing,
unstable
300
a
month
for
18
months
for
a
total
of
5
400.
J
Originally
this
was
envisioned
to
kind
of
occur.
The
the
folks
who
would
be
invited
into
that
program
will
be
identified
in
an
eviction
court,
because
eviction
court
has
not
restarted.
We
are
finding
other
ways
to
do
that.
We're
going
to
roll
it
out
in
a
series
of
four
cohorts
of
12
people,
so
we
developed
a
weighted
assessment
tool
to
for
people
who
are
calling
in
who
want
to
they
call
2-1-1
who
want
to
or
feel
that
they
might
need
that
project
to
ensure
that
we're
reaching
the
people
who
need
it
most.
J
So
that's
starting
we're
learning
lessons
from
that
right
now
there
have
we
have
not
reached
12
yet
that
we
can
start
payments
for,
but
that
is
another
major
milestone
that
we've
reached
in
this
project,
which
has
now
been
functioning
for
for
two
quarters.
We're
we're
ending
our
second
quarter
at
the
end
of
june.
J
There
are
five
sub
guarantees,
including
iura,
so
ira's
part
in
this
is
basically
to
provide
administrative
support,
and
so
my
time
and
involvement
in
this
project
is
covered
by
this
grant,
not
the
hud
entitlement
funds
most
of
the
pieces
are
staffed
up
at
this
point,
except
for
an
outreach
piece
that
we
keep
thinking
about
and
reconfiguring
the
original
entity.
That
was
thought
to
be.
That
would
be
the
the
home
agency,
for
that
project
did
not
ultimately
did
not
ultimately
have
the
capacity
to
take
that
on.
J
What
else
paula
younger
has
been
contacted
by
hsc
to
be
the
part-time
grants
manager
of
this
project,
so
she's
been
working
with
the
project's
core
team,
which
is
the
project
oversight
committee
that
includes
laura
carl
foyer,
liddy
barger
from
hsc
and
the
coc
and
myself
and
the
advisory
board,
which
is
partners
who
have
a
piece
of
each.
You
know
one
of
the
service
pieces
of
the
project
and
other
community
members
who
advise
the
core
team
on
directions
to
take
paula
will.
J
Here
in
ithaca,
we
have
a
commitment
from
mayors
for
guaranteed
income
for
a
half
a
million
dollars
to
put
towards
a
pilot
project
for
guaranteed
income
in
in
ithaca,
thanks
to
the
mayor's
involvement
with
that
group,
and
so
we've
requested
from
enterprises
additional
funds
so
that
we
can
actually
do
the
highest
form
of.
I
don't
want
to
say
the
highest
form.
I
should
say
to
be
able
to
enroll
enough
people
to
have
a
randomized
clinical
trial.
So
that
means
we
would
need
to
enroll
115
people
locally.
J
Then
we
could
also
enroll
115
people
in
a
control
group
who
would
also
get
some
some
funds
in
their
pocket,
though
they
aren't
participating
in
the
the
receipt
of
guaranteed
income.
They
could
participate
in
voluntary
surveys
and
get
paid
for
those.
So
if
we
are
able
to
leverage
that
fund
from
enterprise,
we
can
do
the
randomized
control
trial
with
the
university
of
pennsylvania's
center
for
the
study,
I'm
sorry
center
for
guarantee
income,
research,
who's.
J
Looking
at
these
projects
nationwide
and
collecting
data,
and
if
enterprise
declines
to
fund
this,
we
can
still
go
ahead
with
the
guaranteed
income
project,
just
based
on
the
marriage
for
guaranteed
income
commitment
of
500
000,
but
we
probably
wouldn't
be
able
to
do
a
randomized
clinical
trial
unless
we
found
a
different
funding.
So
that's
where
we
are
with
the
project
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and
laura
also,
as
you
know,
as
I
mentioned,
is,
has
been
involved
in
this
project
from
the
very
beginning.
H
No,
I
just
think
this
is
a
group
that
has
worked
so
hard.
It
was
great
that
anissa
identified
this
enterprise
grant
project
initially
wrote.
The
application
city
was
awarded
the
the
grant
and
it
has
been
a
process
that
has
had
to
change
as
anisa
mentioned,
because
of
the
eviction
moratorium
being
extended,
which
is
a
good
thing.
H
What
it
does
mean,
though,
is
that
some
tenants
have
built
up
anxieties
about
rent
that
has
been
accruing,
and
so
rental
arrears
covering
rental
arrears
is
really
important.
Covering
future
rent
is,
is
really
important
up
to
three
months
of
future
rent.
So
it's
been
a
a
long
project
and
we
hope
we're
starting
to
see
the
implementation
and
the
impact
really
helping
local
city
residents.
Who
are
our
tenants.
H
J
B
J
C
J
Well,
I
can
conjecture
so
the
the
students
that
looked
into
that.
I
think
basically,
it's
sort
of
this
notion
that,
for
example,
locally
only
three
percent
of
tenants
who
were
in
eviction
court
in
2018
had
any
representation,
but
virtually
all
landlords
did
so
an
observer
in
court.
I
think
is
you
know.
I
don't
think
that
the
new
orleans
project.
J
So
I
think
what
happens
is
that
there
are
more
continuances
granted
and
things
like
that,
so
that
somebody
who
is
facing
eviction
has
more
time
to
gather
resources
or
documentation,
whether
that's
emergency
funds
or
a
lawyer
to
represent
them
or
somebody
else
to
assist
them.
I
think
it's
really.
It
just
makes
the
process
a
little
longer,
which
benefits
the.
C
Defendant,
okay,
great
well!
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
that
report
and
thank
you
for
all
the
work.
It
does
seem,
there's
a
swirl
of
possibilities.
Now.
Enterprises
and
mayors
will
guarantee
that.
So
it's
very
good.
I
look
forward
to
our
next
meeting
about
it
too,
and
any
other
questions
from
from
the
agency.