►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (09/21/2021)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
D
Legal
description,
log
3
block
66,
pablo
beach
improvement
company's
flat
of
part
of
the
northern
portion
of
pablo
beach.
Current
zoning
rs2
motion
to
consider
34-337
e1e
for
long
coverage
of
45
maximum
directed
by
an
existing
non-conforming
paper
patio
and
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
a
new
screened
enclosure
to
an
existing
single-family
dwelling.
C
F
F
A
screen
enclosure
on
top
of
it
and
that's
when
we
found
out
when
we
applied
for
the
permit
that
the
previous
owner
had
put
the
papers
down
without
a
permit.
So
the
house
was
already
over
the
lot
coverage
when
we
bought
it
and
we're
not
increasing
the
law
coverage.
We
just
want
to
put
a
screen
enclosure
over
the
papers
that
we
already
have
that's
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish.
F
G
G
A
B
F
I
do
have
a
few
things
that
I
want
to
clarify.
It
sounded
like,
and
it
may
have
been
the
muscle,
the
microphone.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
clear
we're
asking
for
48
percent
lock
coverage,
not
43.
F
G
G
G
G
F
Currently,
a
pool
and
we're
going
to
be
reshaping
the
pool,
that's
pretty
cool
so
that
you
might
be
looking
at
a
kidney
shape.
It
could
keep.
G
F
F
Let's,
let's
go
to
this
property
very
often
I
have
to
speak
in
with
their
with
their
assistance
and
explain
what
we're
doing.
They
understand
understand
that
you
know
it's
likely
going
to
be.
You
know
we're
gonna
have
a
stairwell
in
the
same
location.
F
F
If
you
don't
think
you're
looking
at
that,
that
survey
up,
there
will
not
express
the
true
current
block
coverage
as
it
exists
today,
and
I
do
have
a
copy
with
me.
If
you'd
like
me
to
distribute
that
among
your
board
members
does
that
change
law
enforcement?
Well,
the
current
lock
cover
that
that's
the
exchange.
F
G
F
F
A
So
on
the
on
the
staff
notes,
it
says
these
looking
for
a
setback
of
7.7
feet
10
feet,
but
I
don't
see
that
on
the
application.
Is
that
that's.
G
B
I
I
spoke
here
a
couple
of
months
ago.
Someone
on
the
do
well
drive
wanted
to
have
a
variance
on
the
slope
on
the
driveway,
and
I
thought
it
was
worth
it
to
come
here
and
speak
about
that
and
it
was
eventually
turned
down,
but
that
was
just
the
slope
of
the
driveway.
This
is
a
considerably
different,
much
larger
request
and
I'm
very
excited
about
it.
I
I
A
I
H
D
The
next
item
is
a
letter
from
the
applicant,
the
applicant
gael
and
edward
carlton.
4030.
Do
all
drive
is
requesting
a
variance
to
memorialize
existing
coverage
and
increase
for
a
non-conforming
substandard
plotted
lot
of
record
all
for
new
construction
of
a
single
family
residence.
In
doing
so,
edward
and
yael
have
discussed
the
request
with
neighbors
and
the
signatures
below
substantiate
support
for
the
variance
request
the
items
listed
below
are
presented
to
the
neighbors,
consistent
with
the
submitted
variance
request
currently
before
the
board
of
adjustment.
D
One
adjust
lot
coverage
from
42
to
48,
as
shown
on
attached
survey,
two
south
side
yard
set
back
to
7.5
feet
in
low
of
10
feet:
three
south
side,
yard
setback
for
low
profile
fence
to
protect
ac
and
pool
equipment,
two
feet,
eight
inches
from
property
line,
respectfully
yale
and
edward
carlton
and
then
the
neighbors
names.
Some
of
them
are
hard
to
make
out.
So
I
will
do
the
best.
I
can
holly
and
georgina
walker,
3938
duval
drive,
steve
lear,
3922
duval
drive
completely
illegible.
D
D
C
D
There
just
seems
to
be
a
discrepancy
and
the
next
letters
to
the
board
of
adjustment
members.
Please
deny
the
variance
request
for
boa
number
21-100127,
as
it
does
not
meet
the
criteria
for
our
variance.
There
is
simply
no
proof
of
hardship.
Dubai
drive
is
bordered
by
water
on
each
immediate
side,
lake
duval
to
the
west
and
the
atlantic
ocean
to
the
east.
The
street
has
a
long
history
of
flooding.
The
city
invested
money
to
upgrade
the
drainage
not
too
long
ago.
Approving
additional
liam
coverage
will
place
current
and
future
residents
in
danger
of
flooding
homes.
D
Flooding
is
the
hardship
in
reviewing
the
submitted
variance
application.
I
disagree
with
most
of
the
statements
made
but
want
to
spotlight
the
following
the
statement
there.
One
of
the
narrow
slots
on
the
street
is
simply
not
true.
Their
lot
is
reportedly
60
feet
wide.
There
are
34
homes
and
lots
that
are
60
feet
or
smaller
30
homes
sit
on
50
foot,
wide
lots,
the
lots
on
down
drive
vary
in
sizes
and
only
a
handful
are
in
excess
of
70
plus
feet,
approximately
14
or
15..
D
The
picture
of
the
vacant
lot
included
in
their
packet
is
one
of
the
largest
lots
on
the
street
and
sits
eight
houses
north
of
them.
There
are
only
three
or
four
that
size,
so
the
pictured
lot
is
not
really
the
norm
for
the
street.
The
lot
at
40
30
do
while
drive
is
not
a
substandard
or
an
unusual
lot
size.
It
is
not
one
of
the
narrowest
lots,
so
this
cannot
be
used
as
a
plea
for
hardship.
D
Number
two
to
state
reducing
the
sign
yard
setback
on
the
south
will
allow
for
off-street
parking
is
a
misleading
statement
projects
in
the
beach
ordinance
invisible
by
the
no
parking
signs
on
our
street
parking
is
not
allowed
on
dubai
drive.
Therefore,
it
is
only
off
street
parking.
If
you
park
on
dual
drive,
it
creates
a
dangerous
one-lane
road.
D
It
also
creates
the
potential
of
emergency
vehicles
not
being
able
to
safely
access
the
streets.
The
residents
follow
this
and
do
not
park
on
the
street.
Sadly,
we
have
been
forced
to
enter
the
ridiculous
over
abundance
of
contractors
who
park
on
the
street,
blocking
our
driveways
and
creating
blind
spots,
etc.
The
building
contractors
are
the
violators.
If
additional
parking
is
needed,
the
residents
gladly
share
driveways
with
neighbors,
so
the
statement
it
will
allow
for
off-street
parking
is
an
inaccurate
and
misleading
statement.
D
Number
three
in
regards
to
the
neighbors
who
sign
in
support
of
this
build
four:
do
not
live
on
duval
drive,
so
I
assume
they
will
not
be
impacted
by
this
build
and
their
support
irrelevant
and
the
others
live
on
the
north
end
of
the
street
and
again
not
immediately
impacted
by
the
build.
Only
one
signature
is
a
future
immediate
neighbor
that
neighbor
does
not
currently
live
on
the
street,
as
he
has
been
building
his
home
for
over
two
years
and
sadly
for
us
it
is
still
not
finished.
D
This
family
of
four
purchased
a
two-story
home
that
has
been
quite
adequate
for
other
families
of
four
to
live
in.
They
now
want
to
build
a
three-story,
larger
home,
covering
more
land
to
have
a
workshop
as
a
luxury
is
not
a
hardship
and
it
is
unnecessary
covering
more
land,
so
they
can
have
a
larger
slash.
Different
patio
by
the
pool
is
a
luxury,
not
a
hardship,
and
it
is
unnecessary.
D
I
am
sure
they
can
build
a
larger
three-story
home
on
the
current
footprint.
The
board
cannot
responsibly
approve
more
and
more
land
coverage
without
the
danger
of
flooding
homes
of
the
current
residents.
The
board
has
denied
variances
requesting
much
less
coverage
than
the
48
in
recent
years
and
therefore
it
is
appropriate
and
responsible
to
deny
this
one.
Please
deny
the
request
for
this
variance.
It
does
not
meet
the
criteria.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
attention.
D
To
know
what
may
concern
my
name
is
mg
orender
and
I
reside
at
3909.
Duval
drive,
I'm
a
golf
course
developer
and
operator
and
nearly
30-year
resident
of
duval
drive,
and
I
am
in
favor
of
the
need
for
the
48
lock
coverage
due
to
non-conforming
lot
owned
by
my
future.
Neighbor
ed
carlton
feel
free
to
contact
me
directly.
If
you
wish
to
discuss
respectfully
mg
oranger
and
how
is
it.
F
F
It's
my
understanding
that
lake
duval
has
undergone
some
updates
after
hurricanes,
where
water
used
to
pump
out
into
the
ocean,
which
now
goes
into
tijuana
so
long
as
the
palm
fronds
are
not
blocking
some
of
some
of
the
culverts.
F
So
there
has
been
some
upgrades
to
the
street
that
I
think
are
mentioned
so
continuing
to
hash
out
a
hurricane
and
flooding
that
happens
in
those
instances,
I
think,
are
a
bit
behind
us
and
somewhat
rare.
It's
also
my
understanding
that
the
gentleman
stood
up.
It
does
not
have
a
bulkhead
majority
of
individuals
that
live
on
the
lake,
whether
or
not
it's
on
hunter
beach
boulevard
or
on
lake
duval
do
have
bulkheads
the
other
individual
that
spoke
in
opposition
of
this.
F
I
think
you've
probably
heard
the
name
several
times
somewhat
of
a
regular
respect
their
position,
but
this
house
is
also
not
compliant.
Okay.
We
have
to
understand
that
we're
not
just
asking
for
lock
coverage.
This
is
that
house
built
in
1930
that
doesn't
have
a
garage.
So
not
only
is
it
not
10
000
square
feet,
it's
not
90
feet
at
the
building
line,
but
doesn't
even
have
a
one
car
garage.
F
Okay.
So
that's
what
we're
talking
about
here.
It
is
sub-standard
for
for
family
home.
That's
why
they
moved,
because
the
amount
of
updates
that
they
have.
So
that's
what
I
have
to
say
in
regards
to
rebutting
it,
and
I
would
like
to
distribute
this
if
anyone
has
any
disputes.
Is
this
certified
survey
stating
a
lot
coverage
by
probably
one
of
the
most
commonly
used
surveyors
in
jacksonville,
which
clearly
expresses
the
amount
of
current
coverage?
Did
you
trade
from
the
storefront,
partly
you
paid
for
the
server
right?
I
did
yeah
it's
certified
and
that.
F
Simply
outdated
it
doesn't
it's
not
wrong,
that's
already
not
wrong,
yes,
sir,
yes
and
and
that
that
survey
is
not
just
we're
not
over
50,
just
because
of
the
pool
coping
okay.
If
you
look
at
the
new
survey
compared
to
that
survey,
there's
been
a
lot
of
creep
everything
from
pavers
around
the
house
to
stairwells
to
coping
around
the
pool.
G
F
Yes,
ma'am
and
in
regards
to
parking
parking
around
the
whole
beach
is,
is
a
real
issue
that
can't
be
negated
and
it's
an
issue
on
dubai
drive
whether
or
not
people
are
building
or
not.
I
promise
you,
and
so
it's
fun,
it's
always
in
some.
Yes,
sir,
although
less
since
default
drive
has
been
redone
a
few.
C
C
G
Christian,
I
have
a
question
I'm
going
back
to
this
moralization.
I
understand
the
moralization
of
the
20
foot
and
25
foot
second,
but
it
was
never
approved
that
third
was
sterile
in
the
applications
prior.
How
do
you
moralize
something?
That's
non-performance,
that's
side,
stairwell!
It's
a
good
question.
G
H
Through
the
chair,
I
think
to
your
point:
it
was
not
covered
in
the
previous
variants.
It's
stated
in
his
application,
the
existing
stairs
or
what
he
was
requesting
have
memorialized
right
right,
so
you're
correct.
They
were
never
granted
a
sent
back
to
the
stairs
so
as
advertised
the
setback
would
be
7.7,
which
was
noted
on
the
survey
or
the
cycling
that
was
proposed
from
the.
G
H
Actually,
I'm
going
to
make
a
corrections.
It
was
noted
in
here
that
there
was
a
mended
approval,
so
originally
the
96
107
96
dla
variance
application
carried
over
to
the
following
meeting,
which
originally
was
in
july
to
move
to
august
of
96,
and
then
it
said
the
amended
approval
to
a
southerly
side
yard
of
four
feet
in
lieu
of
ten
for
submitted
plans
only
on
eight
six.
Ninety
six,
okay
I'll
see
that.
G
H
H
Correct
or
as
it
was
based
on
yeah
I
mean
we
would
have
a
copy
of
the
96
approved
survey
or
site
plan
from
august
6th,
so
you
can
condition
it
to
that
approval
and
whatever
that
limited
amount
of
engagement.
G
H
D
D
Read
where
the
neighbor
mentions?
D
Here,
but
I
just
think
it's
worth
mentioning
that
we
do
consider
undersized
slots.
That's
I
mean
one
of
the
most
common
things
that
we
consider.
So
I
understand
a
neighbor
who's,
sort
of
eyeballing,
the
property
might
say.
Oh,
that
property
doesn't
look
small.
It
looks
totally
within
one,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
it's
said
that
this
lot
is
undersized
per
the
land
development
code
and
that
that
is
precisely
what
we
are
charged
with
reviewing.
D
D
It
would
be
with
the
condition
that
memorial,
if
I
wrote
this
down
correctly,
that
memorialization
of
existing
characteristics
applies
only
to
previously
approved
variances
christian
was
that
is
that
worded
properly.
H
A
A
B
E
E
G
And
just
for
clarity
to
get
to
62
is
what
I
assumed.
What
62
is
to
fill
in
all
that
grass
on
the
screen
is
that
how
we
got
the
62?
Currently
it's
not
62.
Is
that
correct?
I
believe
it
is.
I
think,
I'm
looking
at
the
diagram,
they're
filling
in
all
that
area
to
fill
a
square
screen
around
a
correct,
a
regular
shape.
G
E
H
The
existing
survey
shows
us
the
property
being
at
sixty
percent,
a
lot
of
coverage
and
the
request
is
for
62..
My
understanding
is
that
the
two
percent
was
the
footer
for
the
screenplay
not
to
fill
in
everything.
E
E
E
D
E
Okay,
we're
the
first
guys
to
call
them.
Obviously
the
screen
is
a
closure
and
it's
enough
another
thing:
it's
a
safety
issue.
He
works
out
of
town
a
lot.
He
wants
to
go.
Listen
I've
been
doing
coach
for
35
years.
You
can
put
locks
on
screen
doors,
so
I
know
that
keeps
the
honesty
and
stuff.
So
that's
what
he's
that's
his
name?
F
E
Do
that,
but
we're
trying
to
have
to
make
him
remove
his
front
walkway
from
his
driveway
to
his
front
door.
We'd
rather
take
some
of
the
other,
like
your
garage,
there's
a
pad
bottom
by
the
back
gate.
You'll
get
rid
of
that.
There
are
the
garage
or
the
garbage
can
pads.
You
can
get
rid
of
that
stuff.
I
know
it's
small
stuff
and
it
all
adds
up.
D
G
E
E
D
D
E
E
D
Question
is
you
mentioned
that
the
homeowner
would
be
willing
to
make
some
concessions
like
removing
a
pad
and
possibly
changing
the
the
pavement
of
the
driveway
or
walkway?
Do
you
know,
have
you
calculated
if
you
remove
certain
things
strategically
from
around
the
property?
Do
you
have
like
a
goal
in
mind
of
what's
the
lowest
that
you
could
work
with,
because
I
don't
see
myself
being
able
to
work
with
62.
D
E
E
G
A
C
C
H
E
D
D
B
A
B
A
Yes,
so
we
have
a
rs2
life
size,
hardship,
our
live
coverage
upon
purchasing
a
home
was
35
and
a
half
percentage
we're
requesting
to
go
to
44
to.
I
F
G
G
Any
feedback
from
any
of
your
neighbors
any
conversations
you've
had
with
them.
Yes,
I
have
spoken
to
the
neighbors
on
both
sides
and
diagonal
from
me.
No
concerns.
D
D
Yes,
we
have
a
card:
gary
carley,
1160,
20th
street
north
jack's
beach.