►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (11/19/2019)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
Case
please
certainly
case
number
boa
number
one
90s
one:
zero
zero
one,
seven,
ninety
the
applicant
owner
is
Brian
and
Cheryl
Wolfe
property
addresses
30:55
and
Sigma
Drive
parcel
ID
is
one
eight
zero,
nine,
four
nine
one.
Three
six
five
legal
description
is
locked
66,
okay
unit
number.
One
current
zoning
is
a
PUD
promotion
to
consider
the
City
of
Jacksonville
Beach.
When
development
code
sections
PMD
ordinance
number
two
zero
zero.
C
D
E
B
D
You
please
post
a
hardship
preclearance,
yes,
we're
the
original
owners
of
this
house
19
years
ago.
Okay
and
we've
had
some
concrete
papers
there,
and
you
know
a
lot
of
our
neighborhood
has
increased
its
value.
The
houses
with
additions,
Home
Edition,
pools,
patios
and
we're
looking
to
do
something
similar
in
a
sense
of
extended
our
patio
to
have
a
4.2
percent
more
a
lot
coverage
to
doing.
D
D
E
C
Certainly
case
number
video,
a
1
9
1
0
0
1
8
0,
the
applicant
owner
is
Jeffrey.
The
agent
is
Earl
Johnson
property
address
of
509
15
anymore
parcel
ID
is
1
7
4,
8,
2,
0
0
0
0
legal
description
is
not
6
black
5
cert
park.
Current
zoning
is
an
RS
1.
The
motion
to
consider
is
the
City
of
Jacksonville
Beach
line
development
code
sections
34,
336
e
1,
C
2
for
an
easterly
side:
yard
of
17
in
lieu
of
10
minimum
to
rectify
an
existing
nonconformity
in
the
law.
B
E
G
G
For
this
variance,
this
world
will
be
real
familiar
with
the
situation.
It's
an
old
planet
subdivision
house
back
in
the
50s
and
the
current
homeowner
now
for
both
proposes
to
do
some
major
renovation
and
during
the
permit
application
review
to
historical
encroachments
were
triggered
by
the
50%
group.
G
No
new
construction
is
proposed
for
this
area.
Secondly,
there's
a
portion
of
the
existing
driveway
that
approached
us
into
the
opposite
side
guard
setback.
This
drive
hood
was
here
when
the
owners
purchased
the
home,
and
likewise
no
construction
is
proposed
to
this
area.
Both
of
these
are
the
question.
Very
artistic
involve
existing
conditions
that
are
not
related
to
any
of
the
proposed
renovations.
B
A
H
G
F
I
You're
right
it
doesn't
Clark,
you
foot
setback,
see
I've
only
put
on
our
application,
big
one
with
a
seven
foot
setback.
However,
it
is
in
your
discretion
if
you
feel
that
it
is
an
existing
on
performance,
you
find
that
it
should
meet
the
proper
burial
criteria
to
grant
more
than
it's
on
the
application.
That's
what
you
feel
is
necessary
to
get
this.
I
As
I
said,
you're
looking
at
the
application
as
a
whole
right
now
and
you're
looking
at
what
is
needed
to
bring
the
variance
and
whether
or
not
it
meets
the
variance
criteria,
that's
their
only
discussion.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
written
if
they
want
to
verbally
ask
for
it,
then
they
can
put
that
in
the
record.
If
that's
something
that
they
want
to
ask.
I
We
do
still
have
a
50%
margin
rule
present
world,
where
they
do
have
to
come
into
compliance
with
that
in
this
case,
I'm,
guessing
that
it
would
take
demolishing
the
structure
in
order
to
get
it
into
compliance
with
the
code.
That
would
be
the
merchant
ship,
but
if
they
want
to
verbally,
ask
you
and
put
on
the
record
or
I'm
guessing
that
they
need
a
zero
block
line.
I
I
Variance
criteria
now
as
to
the
application
and
the
sufficiency,
the
department
has
reviewed
it.
They
didn't
write
it
on
the
application.
If
it
needs
to
go
back,
you
can
ask
them
to
continue
it
and
go
back
and
look
at
the
department
or
they
can
make
a
verbal.
There
is
no
law
around
the
map.
That
says
you
cannot
okay.
So
what
I
am
telling
you,
though,
is
that
perhaps
you
want
to
have
them
continue
it
go
back,
bring
it
back
to
another
board
meeting
where
you
think
all
the
information
you
want
to
see.
I
That's
also
your
option
to
do,
but
the
only
law
you
have
to
apply
is
the
law
of
variance.
What
are
the
criteria,
the
conditions
and
does
it
mean
of
areas
it's
their
hardship?
Does
it
meet
the
law
for
that,
because
the
law
isn't
like
if
that
land
development
code?
This
is
a
variation
from
your
look.
Does
it
meet
the
criteria
to
these
apps?