►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (6/7/2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
C
A
Thank
you.
The
board
of
adjustment
meetings
are
quasi-judicial
in
nature.
All
decisions
of
the
board
will
be
based
on
competent,
substantial
evidence,
including
testimony
provided
in
this
meeting.
Any
person
who
is
not
an
applicant
or
agent
who
wishes
to
speak
will
need
to
fill
out
a
speaker's
card
located
on
the
side
table
by
the
door
and
turn
them
into
the
clerk.
Each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
on
each
item.
A
A
Seeing
no
old
business
on
the
agenda,
we
will
move
on
to
new
business.
Can
we
call
the
first
case
please.
D
C
A
A
B
E
Brown
1016
lasalle
street
jacksonville
florida,
three,
two,
two
zero
seven
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
shining
stars.
We
have
a
purchase
and
sale
agreement
on
the
property.
You
can
actually
see
it
from
right
up
there.
It
is
the
ability
adjacent
to
green
room.
We
appreciate
staff
approval
we
enjoy
working
with
christian
and
his
team.
This
is,
in
my
opinion,
a
bit
of
a
cleanup
matter.
The
existing
variants
from
2010,
I
believe,
only
only
captured
the
first
floor.
E
It's
a
two-story
building
from
1946,
so
it
may
have
been
an
error,
but
the
upstairs
is
finished
office
and
this
is
to
get
the
whole
building
to
build
to
be
used.
And
then
you
need
a
parking
deviation.
To
do
that.
I
can.
A
Stand
by
for
questions,
thank
you
I'll,
open
it
up
to
the
board
for
questions.
I
did
have
one
nobody
minds
me
getting
started,
so
the
staff
report
that
we
were
given
basically
explains
that
the
upstairs
space
is
going
to
be
used,
basically
by
the
same
people
who
will
be
in
the
downstairs
area,
they'll
just
kind
of
better
maximize
the
space,
but
in
now
occupying
space
that
has
not
been
used
for
all
these
years
prior.
A
E
So,
to
answer
that
the
building
has
been,
though,
and
the
entire
building
has
been
historically
in
use-
I
think,
probably
without
them
knowing
they
were
out
of
compliance.
So
it's
finished
office
upstairs
with
individual
light
office
users.
At
this
very
moment,
the
building
is
likely
now
vacated.
I
have
been
inside
in
probably
eight
weeks,
but
the
direct
answer
question
practically
speaking,
nothing
will
change.
The
building
was
already
both
floors
were
in
use,
probably
without
the
knowledge
of
the
existing
owner,
that
they
didn't
have
the
sufficient
variance
to
be
doing
that.
E
F
E
Is
not
currently
striped,
but
you
could
argue,
there's
eight
spaces
there.
The
stairs
will
eliminate
one.
So
it
will
be
essentially
the
same
as
what
it
already
is.
But
stairs
will
come
down
to
one
space
will
go
away
to
be
clear
about
the
change,
but
one
would
be
an
ada
and
one
would
be
an
ada,
so
it'll
be
a
six
plus
one,
seven
total
right
now.
Nothing
strikes
so
yeah.
I
can't
point
to
88,
but
it's
approximately
eight.
D
I
think
maybe
you
could
address
the
important
situation
by
explaining
how
many
employees
are
there,
how
many
patients
are
there.
These
are
kids
or
their
parents,
dropping
them
off
other
care
members
dropping
them
off.
Just
walk
us
through.
You
know
a
normal
day.
What
does
that
parking
situation?
Look
like
and.
E
E
It's
not
completely
clear
because
I
mean
the
demand
should
be
similar,
but
as
far
as
the
building
goes,
it
was
contemplated
to
have
support
office
like
administrative
office
upstairs
and
more
it's
not
truly
clinical.
But
let's
call
it
clinical
downstairs
with
actual
patients
and.
D
E
E
Okay,
if
you,
if
you
have
an
operational
question,
which
is
that's
fine,
I
would
pause.
I'm
not
here
to
answer
operational
questions
for
the
applicant,
more
of
them
the
act
of
the
real
estate
side,
but
I
can
positive
if
we
can
have
eric
talk
about
shiny
stars
and
their
demand
for
parking
where
they
are
now.
A
Okay,
so
we
can
have
you
be
seated
for
a
moment
and
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
and
if
the
eric
he
said,
if
he,
if
he's
gonna,
come
up
and
speak
he'll
just
need
a
thought
of
speaker's
card
before
he
leaves
understood
no
problem,
but
no
other
questions
of
the
agent
before
we
moved
to.
E
Subject
there
is
a
purchase
agreement
on
the
property
and,
during
the
due
diligence
ongoing
due
diligence.
This
was
one
that
would
be
a
death
nail
for
lack
of
better
terms,
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
close
a
loan
or
utilize
the
building
without
the
top
two
roughly
2000
feet.
So
you
only
have
half
the
building
per
parking
right
now.
So
then
you
have
a
1946
construction,
nothing
changed!
It's
the
same.
Building
envelopes
same
square
footage
same
configuration
same
lot,
size,
1946,
pre-comp,
plan
construction.
E
So
it's
just
it's
just
under
parked,
like
the
other
historic
buildings
on
third
street,
with
similar
circumstances
and
you
per
the
staff
report,
you
have
three
public.
I
know
it's
not
the
three
public
spots
in
front
of
the
building
and
then
five
plus
on
second
north.
So
and
it
is
a
pedestrian
friendly
area.
So
some
may
potentially
ride
share,
walk
right.
So.
F
A
A
A
Thank
you
so
you're
welcome
to
make
any
statement
that
you'd
like
on
behalf
of
the
project,
but
I
know
that
we're
just
kind
of
wondering
you
know
the
amount
of
staff
you
expect
to.
H
A
H
I
guess
I
guess
the
I'm
not
sure
what
the
current
the
current
staffing
level
for
that
building
is,
or
has
been
historically
just
for,
like
common
apples
to
apples
comparison,
we
currently
have
about
4
000
square
feet
and
we
have
23
staff
members.
H
H
We
max
that
place
out
with
clients
and
employees,
we're
probably
looking
at
maybe
a
maximum
of
20
people,
the
parents.
We
do
one-on-one
aba
therapy
for
kids
with
autism.
The
parents
drop
their
kids
off
so
that
there
wouldn't
be
parent
cars.
It
would
just
be
just
be
staffed.
We
have
a
few
staff
members
that
live
close
to
the
beach
that
would
prefer
to
like
walk
or
ride
a
bike
to
this
area.
H
H
Generally,
like
eight
usually
eight
hours
within
that
time
period,
you
know
staff
based
on
the
kids
scheduling
needs.
So
within
the
7
30
to
5
5
30
time,
we
try
to
figure
out
a
an
8
hour
shift
for
the
employees.
H
I
mean
not,
I
mean
that's
like
best
case,
you
know
from
business.
Standpoint
is
if,
if
I,
if
I
was
able
to
you,
know,
wake
up
one
day
max
the
place
out
for
you
know
both
clients
and
staff,
which
is
isn't
very
likely
yeah.
That
would
be
like
the
the
probably
the
max
capacity
that
I
think
we
could
operate
out
of
you're,
probably
looking
at
at
least
12
to
15
vehicles.
G
That's
pretty
much
double
what
you
have
available.
Yes,
sir
yeah
I've
been
the
green
room
for
a
pint
or
two
in
my
day.
I
know
the
parking
is
a
little
challenging
there
and.
H
H
Possibly
you
know
part
of
the
goal
of
having
a
beach
location
would
be
to
hire
beach
residents,
and
it
would,
I
know
I
live
close
like
I
would
much
prefer
to
ride
my
bike
or
skateboards
in
my
office
rather
than
drive
a
car,
and
I
would
assume
that
95
of
any
other
beach
citizens
that
I
hired
would
feel
the
same
way.
G
H
D
2022
905
am
subject
shining
stars
ada
in
jacksonville
beach.
To
move
me
concerns
I
was
so
excited
to
hear
shine.
Stars
would
be
getting
a
new
facility,
it
would
be
in
jacksonville
beach.
They
offer
such
an
irreplaceable
service
to
our
community
and,
most
importantly,
our
children.
Well,
I
understand
the
reason
for
parking
variances,
especially
in
a
place
like
jax
beach.
I
hope
you've
invited
the
best
interest
to
the
community
to
waive
this
requirement
for
such
an
important
group
service
business
for
this
area.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
your
time.
Best
regards
sammy.
D
And
my
apologies
to
stanley
from
nina
maxwell
sat
monday,
may
9th
2022
1
42
pm.
Subject:
planning
commission,
hello,
members
of
the
jacksonville
beach
planning
commission
I'm
reaching
out
to
offer
my
support
for
shining
stars
aba
to
open
up
a
location
in
jacksonville
beach.
It's
my
understanding,
they're
looking
to
occupy
224
3rd
street,
but
that
they
are
short
the
required
parking
for
the
building.
D
I
previously
served
on
the
community
development
board
in
neptune
beach.
I
understand
that
the
beaches
in
general
have
some
serious
parking
issues.
However,
I
do
think
that
this
particular
business
is
different
from
the
usual
ones.
We
see
asking
for
parking
waivers
shining
stars
is
a
clinic
specializing
in
working
with
individuals
with
autism.
Currently
there
are
no
other
clinics
offering
services
like
this
in
jacksonville
beach.
I
think
that
this
would
be
a
great
benefit
to
the
community.
D
E
I
brannigan
point
out,
as
we
worked
with
christian
and
his
team,
the
ratio
of
three
you
know
one
to
three
hundred
feet
and
we're
four
thousand
feet
would
give
you
twelve
parking
spaces
and
we're
going
to
have
three
public
in
front
five
on
the
side.
So
the
public,
which
I
know
they're
public,
plus
what
we
have
does
put
you
over
the
applicants
expected
12
to
15..
I
E
A
change
not
as
much
of
a
change
it
might
sound
like
the
building
until
this
purchase
agreement
was
actually
full,
so
you
had
first
coast
women's
services
in
the
first
floor,
doing
quasi
clinical
work
and
white
collar,
like
professional
people,
upstairs
a
roofing
company
being
a
mortgage
gentleman,
the
high
crossfit,
so
a
variety
of
light
white
collar
upstairs
and
there
hasn't
been
any
issue
to
my
knowledge.
With
that
building
being
used,
I
realized
they're
working,
probably
not
to
their
knowledge
out
of
compliance,
but
instead
of
feeling
like.
Oh
now,
you
have
a
full
building.
E
G
E
G
E
E
It
usually
that's
more
like
a
subdivision,
but
you
know
you
do
have
some
vacant
land
nearby
and
pretty
sufficient
off-site
parking.
Even
it's
not
the
subject
property.
I
can't
commit
for
any
adjacent
landowners,
but
we
have
a
very
good
working
relationship
with
saint
paul's,
my
mom,
just
retired,
from
there
this
weekend,
but
very
close
to
the
principal
again.
I
can't
sit
here
and
say:
oh
vegas,
there's
there's
some
larger
landowners
that
are
very
cooperative
and
sympathetic
to
the
applicant.
E
And
if
you
look
at
what
eric
said
versus
what
we
have
on
the
site
plan,
probably
five
spaces
give
or
take
five
to
seven.
Seventy
on
the
high
side.
So
we
have
eight
between
the
three
in
the
front
and
five
on
the
side
and
then
there's
some
they
can
land
nearby.
D
E
With
them,
I
have
honestly
my
mother,
she
is,
she
was
in
administration,
the
same
policy
just
retired
this
weekend,
she's
known
about
this
transaction.
It's
parcels
away
from
her
and
her
boss
is
chrissy
thompson.
The
principal
I
certainly
cannot
speak
for
her.
We
don't.
C
E
A
D
K
Let's
do
the
chair,
if
I
can
just
make
a
few
comments
before
you
guys
get
into
your
collaboration.
First
of
all,
I
kind
of
want
to
steer
you
guys
to
criteria
for
one
of
the
things
that
you
guys
look
at
in
your
deliberations.
K
It
basically
refers
to
depriving
the
applicant
of
rights
commonly
enjoyed
by
other
parcels
in
the
zoning
district
and
causing
an
unnecessary
or
undue
hardship.
If
you
were
to
go
through,
the
various
parking
ratios
required
for
a
commercial
you'll
find
that
this
one
is
towards
the
lighter
side
of
required
parking,
probably
somewhere.
You
know
closer
to
the
middle,
but
there
aren't
many
uses
in
this
zoning
district.
That
would
have
a
substantially
smaller
parking
standard,
and
most
of
them
would
still
require
some
type
of
relief.
K
Right,
I
mean,
I
think
you
want
to
avoid
limiting
a
property's
ability
to
be
useful
and
being
that
it's
4
000
give
or
take
square
feet.
Most
of
the
parking
ratios
are
going
to
require
anywhere
from
11
to
15
spaces,
so
some
relief
is
going
to
be
required,
regardless
even
with
the
little
bit
of
relief
they
have.
Currently,
it
doesn't
get
them
past
that
threshold.
So
what
that
relief
is
and
what
it
looks
like
is
obviously
up
to
the
board,
but
staff
consideration
is
that
there's
there's
a
need
for
some
relief.
K
So
what
the
downstairs
building
was
originally
classified
as
office,
which
is
a
one
space
for
300
square
feet.
The
previous
variants
allowed
them
to
convert
the
bottom
floor
to
a
medical
office,
which
is
one
space
for
200
square
feet
that
wouldn't
require
four
more
additional
spaces.
K
But
when
you
do
the
math
the
building
they
never
talked
about
the
second
floor.
It
was
always
still
going
to
be
deficient
in
the
total
number
of
spaces
that
it
needed.
So
the
upstairs
is
being
treated
at
the
one
to
three
hundred
square
foot
requirement,
because
it's
just
strictly
offices.
The
medical
mediums
would
be
limited
to
the
ground
floor,
which
the
previous
variants
in
theory
covered.
But
none
of
that
really
addressed
the
fact
that
there's
a
second
story
with
an
additional
two
thousand
square
feet.
A
K
Yeah,
I
mean
certainly
something
like
a
restaurant
or
certain
types
of
retail
uses.
There's
a
number
of
categories
that
would
have
a
higher
parking
standard
that
I
didn't
get
they
would,
but
they
would
probably
still
need
more
relief
than
what
you
would
be
granted
tonight.
If
you
limited
to
this
particular
type
of
use,
because
once
you
change
the
use
of
the
building
the
parking
standard
changes,
then
that
relief
is
only
good
for
the
amount
of
spaces
that
they're
basically
getting
relief
from.
K
So
if
they
need
15
and
you're
giving
them
seven,
they
get.
You
know
x,
number
of
spaces
in
relief
because
they
need
25
they're
still
going
to
be
short
that
difference.
So
a
more
intense
use
would
need
to
come
back
and
ask
for
more
will
or
maybe
just
not
use,
that
building.
C
K
D
K
Treatment
of
children,
because
it's
an
overwhelmingly
complicated
situation,
the
medical
use
is
limited
to
the
first
floor,
based
on
the
previous
relief
that
the
second
floor
is
currently
requested.
As
officers.
K
Well,
yes,
you
could.
The
particular
tenant
doesn't
currently
own
the
property,
so
I
think
your
action
would
be
for
the
owner,
but,
as
I
said
to
the
chair,
I
think
inevitably
this
building's
always
going
to
be
some
type
of
office
or
light.
You
know
so
it
in
my
sense.
It
makes
sense
to
limit
it
to
those
particular
uses
for
this
relief,
as
opposed
to
just
a
specific
tenant.
A
Clerical,
okay:
the
agent
is
motioning
from
the
audience
we
have
closed
the
public
hearing.
Could
we
do
just
a
all
in
favor,
say
aye
to
reopen
the
public
hearing
if
the
agent?
Okay,
all
in
favor,
reopen
the
public
hearing
any
opposed?
E
I'll
be
brief:
we've
had
a
very
cooperative
owner
and
seller.
We
don't
own
the
building.
I
think
if
there
were
going
to
be
even
minor
stipulations
to
the
staff
approval
or
conditions
we'd,
probably
respectfully
ask
for
deferral
in
that
sense,
because
I
don't
I'm
coming
here
with
a
client
that
has
the
purchase
agreement.
If
it's
not
a
clean
approval
per
staff
report
say
it's
conditioned
to
specific
uses,
because
the
zoning
does
allow
more
than
the
usage
you
may
be
about
to
condition
it
to
my.
G
E
We
we
have
actually
have
a
representative
of
the
current
owner
here
as
well.
He
can
tell
the
speaker's
government
sure
if
he
wants
to
speak,
but
we
came
before
with
staff
approval
with
that
particular
application
if
it
gets
tied
to
either
my
client
or
committed
uses.
E
C
A
K
E
A
On
the
floor,
if
we
decided
that
we
wanted
to
let
him
defer
to
the
next
meeting,
somebody
would
have
to
withdraw
their
motion
sami.
Did
I
get
that
right.
C
C
D
Zero:
zero
four
six
property
address:
one
zero
one:
eight
twenty
third
street
north
motion
and
considered
34-337
e1e
for
live
coverage
of
44
and
a
little
35
maximum
to
allow
for
installation
of
a
favor
patio,
walkway
and
swimming
pool
deck
for
a
recently
permitted
swimming
pool
at
existing
single
family
as
well.
A
A
None
no
and
I've
had
none.
So
would
the
applicant
please
be
sworn
in
by
the
clerk
and
give
your
presentation.
F
B
F
F
F
The
reason
for
request
to
exceed
the
allowable
coverage
is
due
to
the
size
and
location
of
our
lot
due
to
the
size
of
our
lot.
The
35
does
not
allow
for
much
decking
to
surround
our
pool.
The
additional
decking
will
give
our
children
a
safer
pathway
around
the
outside
of
our
pool,
and
thank
you
for
your
time
and
consideration.
F
A
Thank
you.
Are
you
prepared
to
take
questions
if
any
board?
Member
has
questions?
Yes,
any
questions
of
the
applicant's
representative.
D
F
No
honestly,
the
neighbor
directly
behind
just
had
the
same
exact
thing
done.
I
think
I
can
probably
count
three
people
on
our
road
and
three
people
on
the
road
behind
him
on
the
other
side
of
us
too,
that
all
kind
of
had
similar
things
done
and
all
of
them
have
passed
and
there's
no
issues.
Thank
you.
D
A
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
has
not
filled
out
a
speakers
card
that
wishes
to
speak
on
this
item
and
if
so,
please
make
sure
you
go
out
of
speaker's
card
before
you
leave
okay
hearing
nobody.
I
will
now
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
the
item
back
to
the
board
for
discussion.
Is
there
a
motion.
D
I
move,
I
make
a
motion
to
approve
doa
22-10046,
based
on
the
testimony
and
evidence,
provided
the
request
has
met
all
the
standards
for
variants,
as
outlined
in
section
34-286.
The
language.
B
A
Also
appreciate
the
fact
that,
though
the
house
is
so
small
and
actually
smaller
than
what's
technically
allowed
by
code,
though
they
do
have
a
variance
for
that.
I
do
appreciate
that
it's
lock
coverage
only
in
the
form
of
papers
versus
you
know,
a
bigger,
more
obtrusive
structure,
so.
G
A
D
C
A
D
Property
address
215,
21st
street
avenue,
south
promotion
to
consider
34-338,
e-1
c1
for
a
front
yard;
setback
of
17
feet
below
20
feet;
minimum
34-238,
e-1
c3
for
a
year;
a
rear
yard
setback
of
10
feet
in
lieu
of
30
feet.
Minimum
and
34-338
e1
1e
for
a
lot
coverage
of
50
into
35
maximum
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
new
single
family
dwelling.
A
G
A
G
A
L
We
have
two
of
them
one
agenda.
This
is
the
same.
L
I
don't
know
80
years
ago
the
one
block
lot
5
is
actually
landlocked
and
so
we're
going
to
basically
turn
the
locks
90
degrees,
so
they'll
have
access
to
21st
avenue
south.
I
don't
know
if
y'all
have
tried
to
go
down
there,
but
it's
a
little
difficult
to
get
to
right.
Now
we
are
on
a
separate
project,
continuing.
L
And
connecting
with
gordon
avenue,
so
these
two
will
face
21st
and
considerably
undersized
lots
and
we're
doing
a
couple
of
modest
sized
homes
here.
L
B
L
L
L
Drainage
plan
by
the
city
actually
will
be
done
by
an
engineer
which
will
drain,
unless
you
know
we're
going
to
drain
out
to
21st
avenue,
which
has
very
nice
direct
access
to
the
retention
area
so
and
we're
also
improving
all
the
drainage
with
the
other
project
that
I'm
doing
in
concert
with
the
city,
the
city
is
actually
extending
21st
avenue,
so
we
did
that
project.
A
few
months
ago,
we
went
to
the
council
in
the
planning.
Commission,
does
gordon
go
through
and
intersect
21st?
No,
that's
part
of
the
project
we're
doing
now.
L
G
L
I
mean,
if
you
look
at
the
survey
closely,
it
shows
it
doesn't
call
it
an
easement,
but
it
shows
a
dotted
line
that
would
have
been
the
access
to
lot
five,
but
it's
not
technically
even
deeded.
So
it's
landlocked
and
we
did
it
the
way
this
planted.
L
You
know,
we'd
have
a
lot
more
lock
covers
because
we
had
to
have
a
driveway.
It
went
all
the
way
around.
The
first.
G
Building
so
there's
an
opportunity
to
do
anything
with
that.
Let's
see
340
square
feet
of
concrete
they've
been,
could
you
strike
it
or
pervious
or
for
the
drive?
Oh.
C
G
G
A
Okay,
I
will
close
the
public
server.
Sorry,
I
will
now
open
the
public
hearing.
Do
you
have
any
speaker
cards
on
this
item?
No
speaker
requests.
A
D
A
Single
family
dwelling
and
does
the
applicant
need
to
be
sworn
in
again,
since
he
already
didn't
think
so.
Okay,
can
you
please
give
your
presentation.
L
Application
this
one
is
obviously
a
little
pie
shape
because
of
the
lake,
and
so
that's
how
we
we
have
a
little
bit
more
land
on
this
one
to
work
with
so
we're
at
39.
So
I
guess
we
take
it
all
into
consideration.
We're
45
combined
on
the
two,
so
very
low
number.
A
D
A
B
D
Property
address
735
11th
street
north
motion
to
consider
34-336
e1c2
for
northernly
side
yard,
setback
of
seven
feet
and
a
southerly
side,
yard
setback
of
6.8
feet,
remove
10
feet
required
to
rectify
existing
non-conformities
and
34-336
e11p
for
lock
coverage
of
41
and
a
little
of
35
maximum
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
new
rear
edition
and
a
new
screen
patio.
An
existing
single
family
home.
A
A
B
I
I've
got
three
kids
under
the
age
of
three
and
and
this
is
a
laundry
room
that
is
in
a
closet
off
off
our
main
living
space.
I
So
what
we,
what
my
wife
and
I
are
hoping
to
do
with
this
variance-
is
we
have
an
enclosed
patio
right
now
or
a
screening
patio
that
we're
trying
to
enclose
and
create
a
kind
of
a
bonus
room
playroom
for
my
kids
and
then
as
well
as
create
a
laundry
room
right
now
to
kind
of
relieve
the
pressure
from
the
main
living
area
of
space,
as
well
as
some
additional
storage?
I
I
C
B
I
A
Just
to
sort
of
reiterate
for
the
record,
you
mentioned
that
you
purchased
the
home
at
37,
which
is
already
you
purchased
it
when
it
was
already
over
the
allowable,
lock
coverage,
but
also
according
to
our
staff
report.
Your
lot
is
undersized
by
about
a
thousand
square
feet
which
necessitates
the
reagents
from
code.
I
I
have
the
two
neighbors
directly
aggressive
to
me:
no
issues.
They
were
just
curious,
what
the
variance
was
for,
but
other
than
that,
a
pretty
fairly
quick
discussion.
A
Okay,
you
can
be
seated
for
now
and.
A
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who's
not
filled
out
a
speaker's
card?
Who
wishes
to
speak
on
this
item
and
if
so,
please
make
sure
you
fill
out
a
speaker's
card
before
you
leave
okay
hearing
none.
I
will
now
bring
the
item
back
to
the
board
for
discussion.
Is
there
a
motion
on
this
one.
A
Yeah
and
I
think
the
the
criteria
that
stuck
out
most
to
me
when
reviewing
this
was
five,
which
is.
A
Is
this
the
minimum
variance
needed
to
accommodate,
which
I
thought
the
fact
that
they're
netting
only
a
four
percent
increase
and
correcting
rectifying
rather
existing
non-conformities,
definitely
hit
that
one
home,
and
I
feel,
like
that's
one,
that
applicants
tend
to
struggle
with,
but
I
do
think
this
is
a
good
example
of
a
minimum
request
being
made
to
you
know
rectify
the
property
when
they
purchased
it
and
already
have
those
non-conformities.
So.
B
John
marlon,
yes,
yes,
dana
molly,
yes,
todd
smith,.
C
C
A
B
C
J
J
J
C
J
A
Okay,
then,
you
can
be
seated
for
now
and
I'll
open
the
public
hearing.
Do
you
have
any
speaker
parts.
A
A
Okay,
then,
I
will
now
wait.
Do
you
miss
wilson?
I
will
now
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
the
item
back
to
the
board
for
discussion.
Is
there
a
motion.
A
A
B
D
A
Yes,
your
request
has
been
approved.
Thank
you.
Next
item
on
the
agenda
board
procedures,
consideration
of
the
change
of
meeting
times
from
7
7pm
to
6pm
for
all
regular
meetings
right.
K
So
kind
of
a
few
things
to
address,
as
I
previously
mentioned,
the
city
attorney
and
I
have
discovered
these
rules
that
the
board
had
that
we
hadn't
really
looked
at,
had
some
inconsistencies,
we're
going
to
try
and
kind
of
update
those
and
turn
them
into
an
actual
procedural
document
for
the
board.
K
So
this
board
procedure
section
of
the
agenda-
is
probably
going
to
stay
for
for
some
time.
So
we
can
continuously
bring
these
items
up
to
you
as
they
make
sense.
We
didn't
want
to
dump
everything
on
you
guys
at
once,
but
with
that
one
of
the
first
things
we
wanted
to
discuss
was
moving
the
meeting
time
up
to
six
o'clock
in
the
last
year
or
two.
I
don't
know
exactly
what
it
happened.
K
City
council
removed
their
meetings
to
six
o'clock
when
they
moved
their
briefings
up
to
5,
30
and
so
there's
an
opportunity
to
have
a
meeting
start
at
an
earlier
time.
We've
gotten
some
comments
from
applicants
and
people
in
the
audience
being
here
from
nine
o'clock
with
kids
and
stuff
like
that.
So
since
it's
a
procedural
operation
of
the
board,
there's
nothing
in
the
code
that
limits
the
time
of
the
meeting
other
than
it
has
to
start
after
5
30..
So
six
o'clock
will
fall
under
that
requirement.
A
I
know
when
it
came
up.
I
think
it
was
over
two
years
ago
now,
the
last
time
it
was
brought
up.
You
know
it
didn't
go
anywhere,
but
I
think
the
fact
that
council
has
moved
to
that
time.
Kind
of
says
for
the
rest
of.
K
C
K
C
D
Okay,
I
move
to
change
the
starting
time
of
the
board
of
adjustments.
Meetings
from
7
p.m,
to
6
p.m,
for
all
regular
meetings,
effective
july
1st
2022.
B
A
K
Yeah
a
couple
things
so,
first
of
all,
I
sent
an
email
today,
I
think,
just
as
a
invitation
to
the
hype
discussion
of
open
house,
which
will
be
july
11th,
which
is
monday,
and
then
I've
gotten
confirmation
from
well.
I've
got
correspondence
from
all
the
board
members,
but
we
will
have
five
members
available
for
july
12th
to
hold
the
special
meeting.
So
if
the
board's
in
agreement
we'll
go
ahead
and
schedule
that
things
here
involved
is
the
only
one
that's
going
to
be
out
of
town
for
that
special
event.
K
Yeah,
you
can
certainly
watch
the
meeting
online
but
that'll
be,
like
I
said,
we'll
put
together
a
staff
report
and
probably
brief
you
guys
ahead
of
time
on
what
that
procedure
is
going
to
be,
because
it's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
different
than
what
we
normally
do.
But
we'll
go
ahead
and
schedule
that
then,
and
then
the
only
other
thing.
We
got
approval
from
city
council
last
night
to
sign
a
contract
with
our
consultant.
K
So
we
will
be
beginning
the
comp
plan
in
the
development
code
process.
We
haven't
scheduled
meetings
yet,
but
still
to
actually
sign
the
contract.
But
as
I
mentioned
previously,
there
will
be
a
meeting
specifically
with
the
board
of
adjustment
and
planning
commission
as
a
workshop
with
those
two
bodies
to
take
input
and
hear
your
comments
and
concerns
and
experience
with
both
documents.
K
K
There
will
also
be
plenty
of
opportunities,
just
as
public
citizens
to
attend
as
well,
but
if
you
want
to
hear
some
of
that
feedback,
but
again
they
want
to
meet
with
the
guys
that
are
actually
administering
the
code,
so
they're
really
interested
in
your
input.
So
that'll
be
one
of
the
first
meetings
that
we
do
so
I'll.
Let
you
guys
know
when
that's
all
worked
out
in
that
app,
but.
K
That
meeting
is
just
on
the
charter
amendment
for
the
height
that
they're
discussing
yeah.
Basically,
the
mayor
and
some
of
the
city
staff
are
just
going
to
present
their
concept.
It
will
go
on,
I
believe,
the
spring
ballot
for
the
citizens.
If
it
does
go
forward.
A
That's
that's
all
courtesy
of
the
florida
visitors
was
not
on
this
agenda
but
saying
that
we
do
have
a
member
of
the
public
here.
No,
I
was
just
just
observing
tonight.
Okay,
that's.
K
A
good
point
so
that
operating
document
that
we
have
actually
outlines
what
agenda
items
are
supposed
to
be
on
the
agenda
and
that
one
isn't
one
of
them
currently
and
the
first
office
pointed
that
out.
So
when
we
go
through
the
document
like,
I
won't
bring
it
to
you
as
a
draft
to
look
at
that's
literally
one
of
the
things.
That's
specific
in
that
document
that
it's
these
items
that
are
on
the
agenda.
So
just.