►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (04/06/2021)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
D
And
the
other,
my
lots
smaller
than
the
other
locks
when
this
ordinance
was
put
into
place,
is
for
7
500
square
foot
watts.
I've
got
5
000
square
foot
lot,
and
so
I'm
trying
to
appeal
to
the
board
based
on
this
discrepancy
and
which
has
to
be
able
to
exceed
the
the
normal
standard
of
the
35
up
to
the
proposed
43
percent.
D
Can
you
take
a
moment?
Explain
to
you
myself,
particularly
yes,
you
see,
you
have
pavers
gravel
sand
beach.
Grass
is
that
if
you're
is
that
your
plan,
I'm
interested
in
a
lot
of,
is
that
to
get
to
that?
Is
that
the
only
area
you
have
papers
where
it
says
papers,
yeah,
that's
the
only
area,
so
everything
else
is
pervious,
then
yeah.
Everything
else
is
perfect,
so
the
whole
area
is
that
one
rare,
okay,
that's
correct.
D
A
Yes,
yes,
francis
bennington,
jeff,
trudeau,
yes,
yes,
thank
you
very.
B
A
B
E
It
is
correct.
The
walk
today
has
two
residences
correct:
it's
an
old
garage
in
the
back
that
was
converted
to
a
studio
apartment
and
then
it's
the
house
in
the
front,
and
today
the
way
you
have
to
park
is
either
parked
in
the
backyard
in
the
side
yard
or
in
the
front
yard.
A
D
A
F
Thank
you,
sally
mcinty,
I'm
at
222,
14th
avenue
north
unit
207.,
it's
a
small
convent,
complex,
a
block
south,
so
I
was
going
to
email
these
questions,
but
since
I
was
striving
through
I
on
my
way
home,
I
thought
in
in
general.
I
know
that
we've
been
very
thoughtful
at
our
condo
complex
with
drainage
and
we've
pursued
options
with
public
works,
and
I
just
wanted
to
bring
a
few
questions.
F
I
I
tentatively
opposed
on
the
basis
of
a
few
items
that
we've
had
experience
in
the
past
with
our
property.
So
my
question
and
some
of
these
questions
were
answered.
F
The
first
question
I
had
was
clarifying
whether
the
small
building
in
the
rear
was
going
to
be
removed,
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
comment
in
just
driving
by
checking
out
the
area
when
we
had
our
drainage
adjusted
a
couple
of
years
ago
with
the
14th
avenue
they
removed
the
curving,
which
created
kind
of
a.
F
Overflow
of
water
organized
water
as
a
river
into
our
grassy
property
as
a
designed
way
of
controlling
water
flow
during
hurricane
and
deluge
of
rains
so
in
driving
by
the
property
as
an
interested
neighbor.
There
are
those
concrete
parking
places,
city
parking
places
across
the
street.
So
it's
my
observation,
there's
not
too
much
drainage
opportunity
and
my
question
is,
for
you
know
the
location,
whether
that's
going
to
be
any
kind
of
a
hardship
for
anybody
in
that
area,
with
greater
water
flowing
downstream.
F
And
one
of
the
questions
was
answered
by
this
drawing,
and
that
is
what
is
the
construction
of
the
driveway
and
whether
pervious
pavers
are
going
to
be
used
or
gravel.
I
noticed
around
jack's
speech
that
there's
a
mixture
of
those
that
composition
to
help
with
drainage
the
if
it's
solid,
concrete
your
water
runoff,
obviously
is
going
to
be
greater
and
then
the
other
question
I
had
was:
will
there
be
future
concrete,
patios
in
the
backyard
or
pavers
for
a
barbecue
grill,
and
has
that
been
added
to
your
square
footage.
F
And,
and
is
there
a
landscape
plan
to
help
organize
with,
I
know
that
my
friend's
house
required
special
guttering
to
make
sure
that
water
running
off
of
the
roof
did
not
fly
over
and
land
in
that
neighbor's
yard.
F
They,
the
neighbor
of
my
friend,
had
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
problems
and
anyway,
that's
just
questions
to
expand
the
thoughts
where
I
know
we've
been
the
city's,
been
very
resistant,
something
to
some
things
that
we
wanted
to
propose,
and
it's
like
a
river
flowing
down
our
avenue
when
it
rains
so
anyway,
I'm
just
talking
for
the
people
downstream.
A
Sure
so
the
design
that
we
have
is
we
want
to
have
all
grass
in
the
backyard.
E
Because
we
have
two
dogs
and
they
need
a
yard
to
play
in
we
plan
on
putting
rock
on
the
side
of
the
house
and
then
for
the
driveway,
we're
going
to
try
and
do
the
previous
papers.
But
then
I
saw
this
design
over
the
weekend.
That
was
pretty
cool.
It
was
a
concrete
block
like
this
big
and
that
big,
but
it
had
rock
and
grass
in
between
it.
So
it
was
really
kind
of
a
modern
look
to
it.
So
for
drainage,
it
won't
be
all
concrete.
E
A
E
A
A
E
A
A
D
G
B
D
B
H
The
city,
yeah
sure
sure
our
house,
we
already
have-
we
purchased
it
in
2015,
35.4,
impervious
block
coverage,
which
obviously
is
above
the
35
minimum,
and
so
our
hardship
is
that
we're
already
above
that,
so
we're
just
trying
to
get
to
39.9
percent
to
get
we're
building
a
little
pool.
You
know
jacuzzi
papers
and
a
screen
as
well,
so.
D
H
Oh
gosh,
I
do
know
that
I
think
possibly
10
feet,
but
I'm
not
100.
H
H
B
H
The
lot
size
when
you're
correct
a
lot
size
is
not
on
our
chip.
The
part
that
we
are
already
over
the
35
is
a
hardship
and
we're
only
really
going
for
was
it
4.5
increased
coverage,
so
we
actually
work
very
closely
with
palace
pools
to
stay
under
the
40
percent
and
we've
tailored
we've
reduced
a
couple
of
times.
We've
had
multiple
iterations
of
the
plan
and
we
had
more
before
that,
then
just
to
stay
under
you
know
respect
to
what
we
wanted
to
do.
H
I
did
not
do
that
calculation.
I
did
a
lot
of
calculations
for
this,
but
I
did
not
do
if
it
was
the
same.
H
D
D
But
if
you
look
on
the
southern
portion
of
that
lot,
you
have
all
that
green
space
there
that
really
can't
be
used
for
anything
based
upon
that
lot.
Today,
you
can't
quickly
put
a
pool
on
the
side
of
the
house
like
that
versus
where
he's
proposed
to
get
to
the
ball.
D
I
still
was
still
a
huge
lot
covered,
I'm
not
saying
I'm
approving
it
by
any
means,
but
because
of
the
way
that
lot
is
today,
it
makes
it
difficult
for
him
to
add
that
fool
behind
him.
H
Hey
you're
exactly
right,
so
we
did
look
at
that
side
lot,
but
the
problem
is,
is
it's
kind
of
hard
to
see
in
the
distance?
Is
there's
two
massive
oak
trees
and
obviously
we
know
how
fast
beach
feels
about
oak
trees.
That
was
kind
of
a
non-starter
for
us.
You
know
so
we
did.
We
did
put
a
new
fence
in
last
year.
We
pulled
a
permit,
obviously,
for
that
and
we
didn't
look
at
the
potential
of
running
it
up,
but
taking
the
trees
down
was.
H
There
is
roughly
105
106
square
feet
to
the
west
like
to
the
west
into
the
south.
Of
that
shed
I
mean
it
would
not
be
easy
to
remove.
I'm
gonna
have
to
jack
over
it
and
get
it
off,
but
that
would
you
know
that
would
free
up.
D
H
Excuse
me
board,
I'm
sorry,
I
forgot
to
mention
that
we're
putting
a
roof
in
so
like
that's
why
it's
pushed
out
as
well.
I
forgot
to
mention
that,
because
otherwise,
the.
B
D
I
mean
there's,
I
think,
there's
things
for
him.
He
could
do
you
know
the
concrete
pad
today
where
he's
parking,
if
that
change
to
gravel
they
remove
the
the
cement
landing
in
front
of
the
shed
area
there
also,
but
I
don't
want
to
make
that
decision.
D
D
B
D
A
D
D
A
B
B
C
Of
course,
edition
goes
in
with
20
feet
required
34-340e
3c2
for
a
corner-side
yelled
setback
of
three
feet
in
lieu
of
10
feet,
minimum
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
the
third
floor.
Addition
to
an
existing
building
and
34-340
e3
c3
for
a
rear
island
setback
of
24
feet
and
30
feet
required
all
to
allow
for
the
convergence
and
improvements
to
an
existing
two-story,
three-unit
multi,
multiple
family
building
into
a
three-story
single-family
dwelling,
and
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
two
new
three-story
dwelling
units
attached
to
the
existing
developed
multi-family
residential.
G
Yes,
sir,
thank
you
for
hearing
us
this
evening
and
I
will
try
to
be
brief.
I
just
want
to
yes,
sir.
I
am.
G
Contacted
me
a
little
less
than
two
weeks
ago,
sister
with
this,
this
hearing
this
evening
and
offered
to
help
in
a
very
short
time
with
a
large
learning
curve,
but
I
think
I
haven't
hold
it
now.
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
just
kind
of
briefly
go
through
why
it
isn't
he's
here
today,
I'm
going
to
let
her
do
most
of
the
talking
and
describe
what
it.
G
And
that's
an
fact:
this
is
her
home.
She
was
not
looking
to
add
any
additional
units
that
she
already
runs
out.
It's
currently
three
units
in
a
single
structure.
She's
proposing
she's,
now
moved
there
to
the
property
full
time
and
she
will
explain
this
award.
What
she's
proposing
to
do
is
to
make
additional
improvements
to
the
existing
structure
for
her
personal
residence
and
attached
to
that
structure
with
in
the
rear
government
would
be
two
additional
units.
G
So
it's
a
relocation
of
the
two
units
that
are
currently
in
the
existing
structure
and
just
for
the
board
reference.
I'm
talking.
I've
got
some
photos
happy.
G
So
the
application
here
with
the
stern's
I'm
contacting
this
way
she
was.
She
was
confused
about
the
notice
requirements
attended
to
this
application
and
and
worried
that
everything
wasn't
in
place.
Someone
I
saw
make
sure
it
was
that
staff
was
covering
all
bases
for
her
in
noticing
this
application.
G
The
concern
was,
as
you
may
recall,
just
a
couple
of
years
ago,
back
in
2019.
This
journey
was
before
this
board
and
security,
zoning
variants
and
other
zone
variants
for
the
side
yards
to
basically
according
to
south,
was
to
ensure
that
if
the
structure
had
been
damaged
by
a
hurricane
or
demolished
that
she
could
rebuild
it.
G
So
what
you
have
here
really
is
during
the
course
of
this
her
ownership
of
the
property
which,
since
back
to
1995
this
was
a
an
old
grocery
store
back
in
the
day
and
then
used
as
a
railroad
unit
who
came
in
95
and
started
making
improvements
and
has
continued
to
do
so.
So
the
variants
that
had
been
branded
historically
for
this
structure
from
there
are
the
the
eastern
side,
eastern
setback,
which
has
gone
from.
G
The
eastern
side
has
gone
from
required.
Ten
foot
to
eight
foot.
The
front
yard
has
gone
from
20
foot
to
four
foot.
The
western
side
is
the
corner
lot.
Ten
foot
to
three:
all
of
those
have
been
improved
over
the
course
of
the
years.
The
only
new
addition
this
time
around
is
the
request
for
a
rear,
a
variant,
a
rearguard
setback
from
30
feet
to
24
feet
to
accommodate
these
two,
the
relocation
of
the
two
units
in
a
different
structure
and
for
the
board's
benefit.
G
G
So
back
in
2019,
she
had
initially
wanted
to
request
the
and
actually
did
her
initial
application
requested.
The
rearguard
setback
as
well,
but
her
plans
weren't
as
fully
flushed
out
as
they
are
today,
which
is
why
we're
here
now.
So
she,
ultimately,
after
talking
with
staff,
decided
to
remove
that
variance
request
for
the
rear
setback
and
just
stick
to
the
principal
structure
to
ensure
that
it
could
be
rebuilt
and
that
it
was
torn
down
in
the
interim.
What
she
has
done
is
hired
an
architect.
G
She
has
plans
to
share
with
you
in
just
a
moment
to
show
that
she
has
done
her
homework
and
is
looking
to
make
significant
improvements
to
this
property,
which
is
going,
which
is
her
home.
She
is
not
an
absolute
landlord
and
and
how
it
replies
with
the
requirements
for
meeting
the
variance
for
the
bureau
of
setbacks.
So
I
won't
belabor
the
point
and
go
to
the
standard,
but
the
the
hardship,
the
principal
hardship.
G
If
you
look
at
the
criteria-
and
I
know
that
back
in
2003,
when
was
the
first
time
she
had
the
idea
of
adding
on
a
structure
in
the
side
yard
and
sought
a
various
application
back
then,
which
was
denied
by
the
board
in
2003.
G
So
the
expansive
question
what's
changed
since
2003
again
today,
a
lot
has
changed,
but
I
limited
this
application
principle
thing
was
at
that
time.
The
neighbor
who
joined
her
property
to
the
east
was
opposed
to
the
application.
The
board
was
sensitive
to
that
it
was
one
of
the
factors
in
their
denial
of
that
request.
G
The
other
thing
that
has
changed
is
the
following
year
in
2004,
the
excuse
me,
media
or
adjustment
approved
variants
for
the
property
directly
across
the
street
on
the
western
side
of
the
stern's
property,
for
a
an
even
greater
request
for
setback
variances
to
allow
for
the
improvement
and
conversion
of
the
multi-family
units
across
the
street.
On
the
other.
G
Corner
and
that
packet
that
I
just
handed
the
clark
is
a
copy
of
that
order,
as
well
as
a
photo
of
the
existing
improvements
that
were
made
to
that
property,
and
that
is
essentially
what
ms
stearns
is
looking
to
do
today
in
2019
and
looking
to
do
an
even
better
job.
G
Lastly,
before
I
let
sturm
speak
as
I
mentioned,
she
has
secured
the
services,
a
professional
architect
who
has
prepared
some
preliminary
plans
and
elevations
for
the
project
which
is
going
to
share
with
you
in
more
detail
to
show
you
what
it
is
that
she's
proposing
to
construct
vertically
on
the
property.
Should
this
varying
request
be
granted
as
well.
G
And
and
that
last
pack
that
I
gave
you
has
the
plans
for
you
to
go
through
the
circulation,
but
she
also
has
larger
copies
as
well.
Maybe
the
board
would
like
to
look
at
those
and
with
that
being
said,
if
I
may
have
and
again,
if
you
said
that,
there's
any
composition
of
this
request,
we
may
have
an
opportunity
to
rebut.
B
G
The
current
application,
the
staff
requested
cmi
for
includes
those
variances
that
have
previously
been
heard
and
approved
by
this
board,
either
in
2019
or
in
1995
originally,
and
those
related
to
the
front
and
side
yards
as
pertains
to
the
existing
building
footprints,
which,
which
is
going
to
remain
system
improvements
and
one
of
the
one
of
the
issues
that
our
neighbors
had
was.
Are
you
seeking
the
variance
for
a
third
story?
G
Well,
no,
because
you
can't
seek
that
it's
happening
because
you're
having
a
dirty
knees
and
and
you're
allowed
to
go
up
with
that
height
and
the
plans
and
she
will
demonstrate
you
are
well
below
the
maximum
height.
D
G
D
G
I
have
no
idea.
Okay,
I
assume
that
he
was
with
you
guys,
because
she
is
no.
She
is
not
with
me.
Okay.
Thank
you,
mr
exactly
to
help
her
about
before
that.
This
board.
D
G
Question
I
believe
they
have
adequate
parking
lot
itself.
I
don't
think
that's
just
both.
A
A
B
E
E
E
E
That
was
the
only
objection
or
only
neighbor,
that
came
through
to
deny
it,
but
that
was
enough
for
the
board
to
deny
it
so
in
2019
I
applied
for
my
third
variance
in
an
attempt
to
build
the
two
additional
units
again
and
increase
the
existing
building
to
three
stories,
pretty
much
what
I'm
trying
to
do
now.
E
I
was
informed
by
the
city
planner
that
I
didn't
have
approval
for
the
non-conforming
setbacks
that
were
there,
whereby
I
thought
I
did.
I
thought
9-5
covered
it,
but
she
told
me
that
if
something
would
happen
to
the
property
like
a
storm
or
a
fire
that
would
damage
it
more
than
50.
I
would
have
to
demolish
the
structure
and
start
over
again.
I
mean
at
this
point
I've
put
a
lot
of
money
and
effort
in
blood,
sweat
and
tears
into
that
home.
E
The
two
ground
unions
are
now
used
as
an
exit,
so
I
just
came
back
to
what
I
had
done
before
lived
in
the
upstairs
and
printed
the
downstairs
units.
At
this
point,
I'm
really
seeking
to
improve
the
existing
unit.
E
E
B
E
E
Mr
sanders
spoke
a
little
bit
about
my
contact
with
my
neighbors
and
I
think
he
already
gave
you
the
map
of
the
ones
that
so
I
here
I
am,
I
contacted
all
the
ones
that
are
directly
around
me,
so
my
easterly
neighbor
they
moved
two
years
ago.
So
I
have
a
new
easterly
neighborhood.
They
totally
support
and
I
actually
have
written
horse
correspondence,
which
I
think
mr
sanders
already
gave
you
and
then
the
two
neighbors
across
the
street,
one
of
them
I've
got
the
written
correspondence
from
the
other
verbal,
the
people
patty
cornered.
E
So
I
just
want
to
get
into
a
little
detail
here.
I
have
like
some
large
schematics
that
some
of
the
plants
that
my
architect
put
together.
His
name
is
bob
gray,
and
he
asked
that
I
read
you
just
a
short
little
letter
from
him
regarding
the
structure
of
the
building
and
why
he
feels
that
we
do
need
to
go
up
a
third
floor
and
how
that
can
be
done.
C
E
All
right
so
so
I'm
asking
for
a
third
floor
to
be
built
on
top
of
the
existing
structure
and
a
third
porch
to
be
built
on
top
of
the
existing
porch
on
the
south
side.
B
E
C
C
And
I
see
the
three
parallel
spots
and
then
it
looks
like
what's
room
for
four
spots
facing
the
front
of
the
building
are
all
seven
of
those
your
properties
designated
spots.
None
of
those.
A
E
E
E
Drivers
and
then
this
is
the
west
elevation
from
2nd
street
so
together
for
me
this
week
for
y'all's
benefits,
but
that's
kind
of
how
the
west
side
would
look
where
you
see
the
stairs
from
the
south
side.
And
then
you
have
your
one
car
garage
and
your
entrance
for
the
two
units
and
then
you've
got.
E
Improvements
that
would
be
made
and
easier
easily
made
easier
made
with
what
I'm
trying
to
do
by
building
the
structure
on
top
of,
what's
already
there
versus
having
to
adhere
to
setbacks
on
just
a
third
level.
So
since
you
are
going
to
read
that-
and
one
other
thing
I
wanted
to
mention
is
in
the
description
that
this
planner
is
put
together,
they
actually
added
some
language
that
talked
about
correcting
I'm
sorry,
I
don't
have
it
right
in
front
of
me.
Did
someone
have
what
my
actual.
E
And
that
that's
because
the
interpretation
of
what
I've
already
been
given
is
just
not
clear.
So
that's
what
I
would
like
to
end
this
meeting
with,
because
I'm
I'm
wanting
to
move.
If
you
saw
this
picture
here.
E
I
would
really
like
to
move
the
stairs
they
come
up
like
to
the
side
now.
But
if
I'm
gonna
go
with
the
third
story,
it
just
looks
so
much
better
and
more
architecturally
pleasing.
If
I'm
able
to
move
those
south
stairs
in
the
middle,
I'm
not
going
to
go
out
anymore,
I'm
not
going
to
take
any
more
of
the
setbacks
than
which
is
already
here.
E
This
particular
end
of
the
stairs
actually
ends
on
my
property
line,
but
I
would
have
a
much
it
would
be
a
nicer
looking
building
if
I
could
just
come
up
the
center
of
the
stairs
versus
over
to
the
side
and
have
one
car
garage
on
each
side
and
that's
what
I'm
looking
for.
That's
what
I
was
always
looking
for
when
I
purchased
that
property
to
improve
it,
not
just
to
improve
it
by
painting
it,
but
actually
make
it
something
that
is
nice
and
it
enhances
the
community
and
I'm
sorry.
E
It's
a
multi-family
property
and
I've
always
made
income
off
of
those
units
that
I've
rented.
It
helps
pay
the
bills
for
living
down
here.
Quite
honestly,
so
those
two
additional
units
would
be
rentals
and
the
unit
and
the
existing
the
unit,
I'm
doing
it.
I've
homesteaded
that
so
I'm
planning
to
make
that
my
home
and
I'm
planning
to
invest
in
these
structures
so
they're,
nice
and
they're,
not
something
that
a
storm
is
going
to
knock
down
very
easily.
I
I'm
quite
pretty
thank
you.
D
A
E
D
D
D
D
E
Well,
I
have
the
porch.
The
existing
structure
is
age.
Free
excuse
me,
is
it
eight
feet
from
somewhere
like
setback
and
then
the
porch
is
another
four
feet,
so
it
doesn't
even
account
for
the
stairs
that
come
out
like
that,
the
steers
come
all
the
way
to
the
property
line.
All
I
was
looking
to
do
was
to
move
that
stairs
down.
So
it's
centered,
but
not
go
over
my
property
line.
E
B
E
G
E
Yeah,
so
right
now,
parking
in
my
building
is
on
the
public
right-of-way
and
if
I
put
a
garage
on
each
side
and
and
have
a
driveway,
it
would
really
make
no
difference
to
the
public
right
of
the
way
versus.
If
I
put
to
use
the
cars
all
to
one
side,
we
would
use
the
same
area
putting
the
cards
to
the
side
or
putting
them
on
each
side.
E
D
D
D
A
A
I
Yes,
I
don't
know
if
you
had
the
opportunity
to
read
through
everything-
I
guess
I'll
go
through
it
briefly.
Some
of
the
points
I
think
were
already
addressed,
but
the
the
prior,
I
guess
the
main
point
would
be.
This
has
already
been
before
this
board.
Once
years
ago,
a
similar
type
of
request
is
denied.
I
I
think
it's
important
that
the
board's
decisions
are
adhered
to
and
not
flip-flop
back
and
forth.
A
similar
project,
smaller
scale
was
already
denied
once
and
I
think
that
that
previous
board's
decision
should
be
honored
and
I
think
it
should
set
precedence
for
today.
This
is
a
larger
scale
project.
I
The
applicant
can
actually
build
this
to
code.
She
can't
build
her
project
to
code,
but
she
can
reasonably
use
this
land
and
I
think
that's
the
point
of
all
this
is
that.
Can
she
reasonably
use
this
land
to
do
to
have
a
project
without
having
to
have
bearings,
and
she
can
do
that?
She
can.
She
can
build
it
to
the
setbacks.
I
The
third
floor.
I
think
there
is
one
correction
there
she
doesn't
have
a
variance
for
a
third
floor.
She
had
a
variance
for
to
rebuild
two-story
buildings.
That's
already
existed.
There
was
not
a
great
spring
that
there
was
not
a
various
ask
for
to
move
a
third
floor
toward
the
street.
That's
important
to
us.
We
are
just
to
the
east
of
urban
and,
of
course,
having
a
three-story
building.
I
I
I
She
is
a
super
host
on
airbnb
and
I
don't
think
we
need
to
bear
ahead
of
this
and
try
to
believe
that
she's
going
to
demolish
all
of
this
improvement
that
she
just
stated
that
she's
done
over
the
years.
I
think
it's
more
likely
that
she's
going
to
have
units
downstairs
where
they
already
exist
or
already
being
read
out
right
now.
I
There's
tenants
in
there
now
look
on
the
website.
The
variances
that
she's
asking
for
at
least
on
the
third
floor
are
not
minimum.
I
think
one
of
the
requirements
is
that
the
minimum
variance
would
argue
random
variants.
That's
minimal
impact
to
make
this
parcel
land
usually
used
reasonably,
and
it's
not
she's
she's,
going
on
third
floor
at
least
eight
feet
versus
twenty
on
the
front
yard
four
feet,
rather
than
twenty
on
one
on
the
porch
three
feet
rather
than
ten
in
the
corner.
I
The
fact
that
she
already
has
that
that
structure
with
the
variances
where
they
are
and
push,
I
guess,
with
reduced
side,
set
packs.
It
actually
provides
here
on
the
north
side
of
the
where
the
unit
one
and
two
are.
It
actually
provides
all
that
space
for
it
to
build.
She
doesn't
need
she
can
build
whatever
structure
she
wants
to
and
comply
with
the
code
as
it
exists.
I
So
I'd
also
like
to
comment
she
kind
of
made
a
comment
that
there's
been
no
no
issues
over
the
years.
That's
not
true.
There's
the
noise
problems
there's
been
parking
problems.
She
indicated
that
the
her
tenants
are
using
the
easement
there
to
be
south
to
park.
I
I
I
I
A
B
Hi,
can
you
hear
me
yes?
Okay?
No.
All
I
would
like
to
do
is
just
reiterate
what
my
son
has
already
stated
and
to
express
that
one
reason
I
was
here
when
this
was
denied
the
first
time,
which
I
think
she
said
that
only
the
next
door,
neighbor
complained
about
which
was
like
quite
accurate,
but
notwithstanding
that-
and
all
I
would
like
to
do-
is
your
rate
today,
referring
to
what
my
son
has
just
spoken
about.
A
B
Question
I'm
kind
of
questioning
this
homestead
thing
because
I've
lived
there
37
38
years,
and
I
have
seen
multiple
people
coming
in
and
out
of
that
three
units
consistently
over
that
time.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
just
last
week
I
counted
10
people
coming
out
of
one
unit
going
to
the
beach.
I
assume
they're,
all
family.
B
I
don't
know
what
concerns
me
is
world
10th
avenue
south
has
public
apartment
at
the
very
end
of
the
street,
which
can
be
enlightened,
and
if
we
get
more
units
in
as
long
as
they're
legal,
that's
fine,
but
if
we
get
more
saturation
in
that
locale,
it's
not
it's
not
good
for
any
of
the
residents
that
live
that
are
full-time,
and
my
concern
is
that
you
know
you
may
pass
this
because
of
the
set
action
and
you're
not
dealing
specifically
with
the
building.
B
B
I
guess
the
longest
rule
they
don't
take
up
too
much
time
is
getting
late,
but
this
wasn't
personal.
It's
just
that.
I
think
for
the
for
the
betterment
of
the
neighborhood.
C
Addressed
during
his
public
statement,
there
is
a
letter
from
kurt
clemons
of
1002,
2nd
street
south
jacksonville
beach
dear
board.
I
have
lived
on
the
corner
of
2nd
street
south
and
10th
avenue
south
for
9
years
since
living
here.
The
short-term
rentals
on
my
corner
have
grown
to
8
in
number
209,
10th
avenue,
south
231,
10th
avenue,
south
922,
2nd
street,
south
1924,
2nd
street
south
926,
2nd
street
south
and
93
second
street
south
three
units.
C
The
proposed
additions
to
983
2nd
street
south
will
be
adding
to
the
already
high
volume
of
transient
people
and
cars
that
are
already
over
capacity
limits
for
this
area
and
the
neighbors
who
call
this
small
area
their
home
for
the
owners
who
call
this
area
their
home.
We
have
slowly
watched
our
neighborhood
turn
into
a
strip
of
hotels,
motels.
The
tenants
that
rent
these
motel
type
properties
come
to
the
beach
to
get
away
from
home
and
have
a
vacation
just
like
at
any
motel.
C
I
noticed
over
60
people
in
one
of
these
units.
I
am
sure
that
is
over
fire
code,
occupancy
limits,
drunken
people
outside
being
loud
and
obnoxious
fights
in
the
middle
of
our
streets,
shooting
off
fireworks,
even
m80
bombs.
Before
and
after
the
fourth
of
july,
or
any
day
of
the
year,
we
even
had
a
renter
and
his
friends
throwing
and
shooting
fireworks
at
cars
and
people
that
were
coming
down
our
streets.
C
Even
if
the
owners
pledged
they
will
turn
their
units
into
long-term
rentals
or
start
living
there
full-time.
There
is
no
guarantee
that
they
will
not
change
back
to
short-term
renting
what
if
the
owners
sell
their
units
to
another
short-term
rental
investor
next
year
that
new
owner
could
make
them
short-term
units.
My
question
to
the
board
is:
would
you
like
to
live
next
to
a
growing
cluster
of
motels?
Quiet
enjoyment
is
the
right
of
every
property
owner
to
enjoy
his
or
her
quality
and
peace.
Sincerely
curb
cleanse.
C
And
I
have
a
letter
from
her
architect,
dear
variance
or
I
would
like
to
explain
why
I
support
the
granting
of
the
request
for
kathy
sturms
relief
for
third
floor
over
existing
structure.
The
existing
variance
relief
granted
was
helpful,
but
it
falls
short
if
the
third
floor
improvement
has
to
conform
to
the
guidelines
of
the
lot
without
variance.
The
primary
reasons
are
as
follows:
the
primary
reason
is
that
the
third
floor
doesn't
stack
over
the
existing
elements,
and
this
creates
a
disjointed
load
path
for
the
structural
engineering
design.
C
There
is
additional
stability
to
the
building
in
general
and
limits
the
interior
columns
that
would
have
to
be
added.
It
makes
maintaining
the
existing
design
more
complicated
and
causes
an
inordinate
amount
of
additional
demolition.
The
second
reason
is
an
architectural
opinion.
I
have
studied
the
alternatives
to
this
requirement
and
they
are
less
attractive
from
the
street
view
on
10th
avenue
south.
I
also
believe
that
the
easterly
building
will
have
better
continuity
with
the
two-unit
addition
to
the
north,
I
was
able
to
use
the
roof
lines
and
materials
to
create
a
consistent
architectural
language.
C
That
brings
allows
the
massing
to
appear
balanced
and
complementary
six
feet
of
relief
for
the
rear
setback.
The
granting
of
this
will
the
granting
of
this
will
improve
the
site
access
to
the
two-car
per
unit
requirement.
It
allows
for
a
one-car
garage
for
each
unit
and
enough
space
to
have
a
single
bedroom.
On
the
first
floor.
It
will
also
allow
for
the
small
green
space
that
is
planned
between
the
original
unit
and
the
two
northern
units
exterior
steel
requirement.
C
D
C
South
elevation
and
floor
plans
that
show
what
is
possible
if
a
new
stair
location
is
centered
and
an
additional
recess
is
created
to
allow
space
for
the
stairs
to
meet
at
the
landing
of
the
front
door.
The
stairs
are
that
I
show
are
just
to
the
north
of
the
10th
avenue
south
property
line,
just
centered.
Thanks
for
your
consideration,
robert
gray
and
his
packet
includes
many
of
the
drawings
that
she
shared
with
us
and.
G
Thank
you
again,
the
chair
of
carl
sanders
for
the
property.
In
this
terms
and
and
on
three
two
three
things
actually
one.
It
sounds
like
the
based
upon
what
the
opposition
stated
in
the
letter
that
was
just
read
that
there's
a
concern
about
short-term
rentals.
This
is
not
a
short-term
rental
situation,
we're
not
talking
about
property
use.
It
already
is
entitled
in
fact
used
as
rental,
currently
historically
rental
for
three
units.
G
As
ms
sturms
explained
earlier,
she
has
recently
moved
into
the
home
and
is
making
unit
one
building
one
for
permanent
home
and
will
continue
to
run
out
too
so
in
actuality,
we're
losing
the
rental
of
his
store
three
units.
G
Yes
and
and
maintaining
the
short-term
rentals
which
which
are
allowed
by
them
and
as
I
think
your
buildings
official
aptly
said
earlier,
the
issue
here
is
the
setbacks.
It's
not
the
use,
it's
not
the
architecture.
G
We
provided
you
with
the
architectural
renderings
to
give
you
an
idea
of
what
what
her
vision
is,
however,
aesthetically
and
and
will
blend
in
quite
well
with
the
neighborhood,
but
this
is
not
a
case
of
introducing
something
new
that
isn't
already
there
today
in
terms
of
the
use,
it's
in
fact
minimizing
the
existing
use.
That's
there
today
and
then.
G
G
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
how
the
tree,
how
the
city
treats
official
parking
spaces,
but
yes,
there
is
unapproved
right
away
on
the
south
side
of
of
the
home
and,
as
was
indicated
in
2019,
when
the
prior
variance
was
was
approved
again
speaking
to
the
setbacks,
but
you
guys
had
this
part
of
the
packet
that
I
hand
out
doubt
in
that
particular
package.
G
You
had
you
had
the
same
issue
in
terms
of
the
second
avenue
south,
with
respect
to
the
drive
coming
for
parking,
but
that
drive
on
the
side
plan
was
approved
by
this
board
was
centered
on
the
property
and
currently
it's
to
the
east
of
the
property.
Presumably
I'm
guessing
leaving
at
least
four
cars
gonna
get
there
today,
probably
two
more
in
the
future
on
the
runway.
But
the
idea
here,
one
of
the
reasons
or
the
primary
reasons
are
going
vertical-
is
to
put
those
parking
spaces
on
site.
G
G
Those
aren't
changing.
There's
no
change
in
the
request.
That's
before
you
today,
that
was
noticed
by
staff
and
what
was
previously
approved
by
the
board.
The
only
thing
changing
in
terms
of
building
one
is
the
architectural
elevations
and
the
height,
but
those
aren't
setback
issues
except
the
new
setback
issue
that
you
have
today
that
you
did
not
have
in
2019
pertains
to
the
rear
guard,
which
is
again
where
the
two
new
structures
attached
to
the
you
know
one
would
be
attached
and
we're
asking
that
to
go
from
30
feet
to
24
foot.
D
D
G
B
Excuse
me
just
just
for
clarification.
Jeff,
I
just
want
you
to
know
you
don't
have
to
register
with
the
city.
Okay,
all
the
rentals
have
to
register
with
the
state.
That's
your
recommendations.
B
D
D
In
my
opinion,
here
since
they're
making
major
construction
changes,
I
can
see
why
we
passed
the
variance
for
the
front
yard
setbacks
previously,
but
they're
making
all
those
changes.
I
don't
see
why
we
need
to
have
a
lot
of
that
moving
forward.
There
is
that
much
space
on
that
lot,
and
for
that
I
don't
think
we
I'm
not
going
to
pass.
That
quote
for
that.
A
That
this
board
has
applied
section
34-286
and
its
six
criteria,
and
I
would.
A
That
there
are
circumstances
that
would
support
a
variance.
A
C
I
would
find
it
hard
to
not
not
approve
that
and
I
can
appreciate
the
impressions
feedback
from
the
neighbors.
C
Obviously,
the
three-story
comment
was
made
on
both
sides,
but
as
far
as
I
can
tell
she's
not
going
above
the
35
foot
height
limit,
she
hasn't
asked
for
a
variance
to
that
and
she's
already
in
those
previously
approved
setbacks
at
two
stories.
So
I
think
the
only
reason
as
far
as
I
understand
it,
mr,
the
only
reason
she's
gotta
ask
for
them
again
is
because
this
third
floor
will
now
be
in
those
previously
approved
amended.
That
x,
I
would
say,
that's
correct.
Okay,.
D
C
B
C
1-81370-000
legal
description
lot:
3
block
12
ocean
terrace,
current
running
rs1
motion
to
consider
a
variance
from
lane
development
code
sections,
34-336
e1e
for
49.5
lakh
coverage
in
lieu
of
35
maximum
and
34-336
e-1g
for
an
accessory
structure.
Setback
of
three
feet
into
a
five
feet:
minimum
to
allow
for
a
cool
and
paper
patio
addition
to
an
existing
single
family
dwelling.
A
C
3916
coinciana
boulevard,
so
I
would
just
like
to
start
with
our
hardship
there.
It
is
okay,
we
are
a
substandard,
modern
air
zone,
rs1,
where
our
standard
size
lot
is
ten
thousand
square
feet,
and
our
current
lot
size
is
six
thousand
six
hundred
fifty
square
feet.
We're
asking
for
an
increase
of
land
use
from
the
current
forty
two
percent.
That
was
approved
for
our
home
builder
to
forty
nine
five
for
pavers
and
walkway
around
our
pool
deck
for
safe
travel
around
the
whole
area
for
our
children
and
guests.
If
our.
C
C
A
The
pathway
we
are
speaking,
you
can
see
that
kind
of
goes
around
the
side.
C
That
pathway
actually
leads
to
the
only
downstairs
restroom
and
so
that's
important
to
us
we're
trying
to
avoid
people
coming
in
and
out
of
the
house
and
slipping
and
falling
with
wet
feet.
C
B
D
D
A
So
the
way
that
our
patio
is
situated
in
the
way
that
the
pool
is
situated,
you
can't
you
don't
have
full
visibility
of
the
south
side
of
the
pool,
and
so
we
wanted
that
extra
seating
coming
out
so
that
we
can
have
full
visibility
of.
C
The
pool
basically
really
to
keep
an
eye
on
our
children.