►
From YouTube: Board Of Adjustment Meeting (04/20/2021)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
E
Board
calls
case:
number
doa
number
two:
five
21-10025
owner
a1a
holding
company
llc
property
address;
118,
13,
avenue,
south
parcel
id
176
254-000
legal
description;
lot;
3
block
132,
pablo
beach;
south
current
zoning
rm2
motion
to
consider
a
variance
from
lane
development
code
sections,
34-3403
c2
for
sidebar
set
x
of
7
feet
in
low
of
10
feet
and
34
34-340
e3
c3
for
a
rear
yard.
Setback
of
25
feet
in
lieu
of
30
feet;
minimum
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
new
3-unit,
multiple
family.
B
F
In
the
rm2
we
don't
have
the
lob
width.
We
have
a
hardship
for
having
a
50
foot
front
yard
width
instead
of
75
feet,
so
that's
giving
us
the
direct
side,
yard
hardship
and
we're
just
asking
for
seven
ten,
which
is
just
three
feet
on
each
side.
F
Just
we
wanted
to
make
a
point
that
I
think
in
the
beginning
of
the
year,
you
guys
just
started
allowing
the
permeable
and
we
don't
we're
not
trying
to
get
a
lot
of
coverage.
We
don't
have
an
issue
with
that,
because
it's
allowed
65
law
coverage
to
view
the
condos,
so
we're
well
under
that,
but
we
were
saying
that
we'd
be
willing
to
do
the
permeable
pairs
just
to
make
the
trainers
better
on
the
property
we're
under
50
as
well
right
now,
with
this
design,
also
the
rear
yard
setback
we
would
be.
F
We
would
be
willing
to
give
up
our
old
ten
foot,
variance
front
yard
setback.
This
property
already
has
that
people
look
better
on
the
street
because
it's
an
alley
in
the
rear
to
have
that
instead
of
the
the
original
template
that
we
have
now.
E
The
existing
10
foot
setback
variants
and
you
would
no
longer
need
the
rear.
Well,
we
would.
We
would
have
to.
F
F
C
A
For
and
what
size
is
the
front
very
set
back
right
now:
it's
10
okay,
yeah.
F
Yes,
sir,
so
it's
in
the
front,
it
looks
like
townhomes.
Basically,
that
is
on
the
13th
and
then
when
you
go
in
the
alleyway
in
the
rear,
that's
one
driveway
for
the
single
wide
unit
that
would
be
in
the
rear.
F
F
So
we'd
be
willing
to.
That
was
the
other
proposal
we
were
going
to
have.
Just
if
you
know,
if
it
wasn't
just
granted
pretty
quickly,
I
was
going
to
say
we'd
be
able
to
move
that
back
10
feet.
You
can
see
that
the
out,
so
that's
the
alleyway
that
has
more
of
a
front
center
wrath,
more
of
a
setback
basically
than
the
front.
F
So
if
we
took
the
10
foot
made
it
20
foot
and
then
we
would
still
have
enough
room
plenty
of
room
to
have
for
the
one
card
or
for
the
parking
for
the
one
car
yeah,
that's
in
the
rear
and
we're
going
to
make
like
we
said
we.
I
think
this
is
50
right
now,
hot
coverage
and
we're
willing
to
do
the
permeable
pavers
worth
it
too.
So
whoever
bought
the
house
would
still
be
more
parking
with
the
permeable
players
that
they
wanted
to
or
which
has
a
lot
of
lock
coverage
left.
F
F
F
There
yeah
exactly
there's
you
can
get
the
parking
for
the
one
house
is
inside
the
garage
and
the
next
car
that
you
can
have
out.
There
is
the
next
15
feet.
I
guess
you
have
a
driveway.
F
We
were
having
to
draw
them
like
this
when
we
had
lot
coverage
issues
on
other
houses,
so
we
kept
doing
this
with
the
strips
and
literally
we
could.
We
could
do
full
driveways
on
these
places
now
with
the
permeable
pavers
now,
since
they
changed
it
in
january,
we
probably
ended
up
doing
that.
Everybody
likes
it
more
just
it
looks
better.
F
So
the
alternative
is,
we
could
go
to
the
20
yards,
20
foot,
front
yard
setback
on
13
and
then
we
can
do
whatever
is
left
in
the
back
with
this
house.
The
same
plane
that
we're
proposing
and
we'd
also
do
the
permeable
pavers
everywhere
on
the
walkways
and
the
driveway.
We
can
list
that
variance
as
well.
F
B
G
And
we've
advertised
it
as
having
25
feet
correct.
It
would
have
to
be
re-advertised
and
deferred
at
the
applicant's
request
to
make
that
modification
only
merely
because
he's
asked
for
the
minimum
setback
as
it
is
right
now,
which
was
the
25
peak,
he
would
have
had
to
indicate
15
feet
or
whatever
the
smaller
amount
is
for
it
to
go
forward.
G
G
F
G
E
Seated,
we
have
several
letters
emails
from
tim
nall.
I
wish
to
say
that
I
am
totally
in
favor
of
the
variants
requested
for
the
above
dwelling.
This
project
will
enhance
the
street
both
visually
and
economically.
Additionally,
the
tax
benefits
from
this
project
will
be
substantial
compared
to
the
previous
residents.
Any
disturbance
or
temporary
inconvenience
to
the
street
during
the
construction
phase
will
be
well
worth
it.
Thank
you,
timothy
nall,
127,
13th
avenue,
south
jacksonville
beach,
bob.
E
Sees
the
wisdom
in
granting
the
variance
for
voa
number
21-10025
at
the
april
20th
2021
meeting
for
the
longest
time
we
have
had
to
look
at
a
run-down
unkept
piece
of
property
in
our
neighborhood.
The
construction
of
this
building
will
be
a
welcomed
addition
to
our
neighborhood.
Please
approve
this
various
requests.
Sincerely
robert
branley
127,
13th
avenue
south
jacksonville
beach,
greg
kaplan
to
the
department
of
planning
and
development,
slash
board
of
adjustment
from
greg
paquin.
I
welcome
all
setback
changes
in
regarding
the
proposed
new
three-unit
multi-family,
drawing
located
at
118
13
south.
E
This
new
building
will
not
only
bring
value
to
the
surrounding
homeowners
and
upgrade
to
the
street,
but
also
additional
tax
revenue
to
the
city
of
jacks
beach.
Thank
you,
greg
pacquiao
from
cassie
blair
good
evening
council
members
I
own
and
reside
at
112
13
avenue
south,
which
is
east
and
next
door
to
118
13th
avenue
south.
I
have
lived
here
for
over
45
years.
I
am
deeply
concerned
once
again
for
the
requested
variants
for
a
seven
foot
side
yard
and
a
25
foot
rear
yard.
E
The
coverage
of
almost
the
entire
lot
is
not
complimentary
to
our
neighborhood.
The
seven
feet
from
my
property
is
too
close,
as
my
home
is
all
wood
and
a
building.
This
close
to
me
is
a
fire
hazard.
My
property
will
be
engulfed
by
this
building,
giving
you
no
privacy,
as
they
will
be
able
to
see
over
my
fence
easily
no
security
from
a
fire
and
the
sunlight
will
be
blocked
over
my
pool
from
the
tall
building.
E
It's
very
sad
to
see
the
demolition
of
a
wonderful,
older
beach
home.
These
have
given
jack's
speech.
The
tournament
has
had
for
so
many
years.
I
ask
that
my
concerns
be
taken
into
consideration
and
that
the
variance
be
denied
for
the
seven
feet.
Thank
you
lillian
park,
and
that's
it
would
you
have
to
respond
to
these
letters?
E
F
F
F
You
know
she
got
a
marriage
to
build
her
house
where
she's
saying
that
she's
too
close
to
hers
now-
and
we
understand
that
if
we
build
that
close
to
somebody,
we
have
to
build
fire
code,
we
have
to
do
a
fire
suppression,
sprinkler
system
inside
the
whole
unit
anyway,
so
she
wouldn't
be.
F
We
wouldn't
end
up
burning
her
house
down.
You
know
in
the
atlantic
fire,
so
she
would
her
house
a
transfer
mess
with
our
comp.
You
know
what
I
mean,
but
her
their
house
is
right
on
the
property
line
in
the
future.
Whoever
buys
it
will
rebuild
it
correctly,
even
with
the
variance
that
they
have
they're
they.
I
think
they
have
zero
a
lot
minor
five
feet.
Maybe
you
know,
and
she
she.
H
F
E
Yeah,
given
the
the
lot
size,
it
seems
like
the
applicant
asked
for
a
minimum
when
they,
you
know,
they
see
people
ask
for
a
lot
more.
E
Zero
zero
two
six
applicant
agent,
john
adkins,
atkins
builders,
inc
owner
james
gillis
iii,
property
address,
536,
14th
avenue,
north
partial
id
174917-000
legal
description,
lots,
4
and
11
block
3
surf
park
unit;
1
current
zoning
rs1
motion
to
consider
variants
from
lane
development
code
sections,
34-336
e1c2
for
signature
and
setbacks
of
7.5
feet
in
lieu
of
10
feet.
Minimum
and
34-336
e1e
for
37
lot
coverage
in
lieu
of
35
maximum
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
new
single
family
dwelling
on
lock,
4.
B
I
John
atkins
1888,
false
language,
jacksonville
beach,
the
hardship
on
this
one
is
the
alliance
under
sizes.
The
rm1
excuse
me
rs1
zoning
district.
A
lot
in
the
lot
is
only
7
200
square
feet
as
opposed
to
10
000
minimum.
It's
80
feet
wide
in
when
90
feet
is
the
minimum
in
rs1.
I
I
A
little
picture
of
the
house,
I
spoke
to
the
next
door
neighbor,
who
had
some
concerns
yesterday
and
was
just
showing
them
that
the
one-story
part
of
the
house
will
be
closest
to
them.
That's
basically,
it
we've
got
a
hardship,
a
lot
size
with
width,
wise
and
size,
wise.
A
E
Have
two
from
frank
wright:
my
family
resides
at
525
13th
avenue
north
in
jacksonville
beach,
next
to
the
property
being
considered
for
variance.
I
purchased
this
property
in
1974
and
has
supported
this
community
for
many
years.
The
reference
property
is
part
of
a
larger
property
which
provided
the
current
main
structure
as
much
more
flexibility
for
expansion.
Over
the
years
recently,
the
owner
decided
to
split
this
property
and
was
given
a
variance
to
legitimize
the
current
footprint
of
the
main
structure
and
adjustments
to
setbacks.
E
We
understood
why
this
was
approved
as
a
conditional
use
application
to
allow
the
owner
to
market
and
sell
the
other
half
of
the
property
as
a
clean
lot.
The
current
request,
voa
number
21-10026,
gives
us
a
problem
as
it
does
not
provide
special
conditions
to
override
the
land
development
code,
the
property.
E
Is
an
open
lot
subject
to
the
setback
limits
of
the
ldc
plain
and
simple
new
construction
should
be
designed
to
fit
on
the
lot,
not
a
lot
to
fit
the
construction.
This
is
a
principle
the
neighborhoods
count
on
to
ensure
standards
in
their
neighborhoods.
If
new
construction
cannot
adhere
to
the
ldc,
then
what
is
the
purpose
of
the
lbc?
In
spite
of
the
visual
impact
a
two-story
home
will
have
next
to
us
with
reduced
sun
exposure
and
reduced
wind
circulation.
E
We
welcome
new
neighbors
in
a
new
home
in
the
neighborhood.
As
the
saying
goes,
a
rising
tide
lifts
all
votes.
We
ask
the
board
to
reject
this
variance
and
ask
the
builder
slash
owner
to
modify
their
plans
to
comply
with
the
lec,
so
we
can
all
benefit
franklin,
wright,
525,
13th
avenue,
north
jacksonville
beach.
E
In
the
second
letter,
our
family
lives
at
602,
13th
avenue,
north
jacksonville
beach
across
from
the
property
seeking
multiple
variances
one
setback,
two
lap
percentage.
Also
to
note
this
is
on
top
of
variances
that
have
already
been
previously
granted
to
this
slide.
I
don't
know
if
there
is
a
maximum
you
can
petition,
for
we
have
been
a
part
of
our
street
and
next-door
neighbor
community
for
20-plus
years.
Variances
are
sacred
and
should
be
respected
within
the
25-50
50-year
future
planned
out.
Each
community
city
leaders
have
forecast.
E
E
We
should
not
compromise
community
standards
for
the
single
entity.
We
should
uphold
our
community
standards
for
the
better
of
the
whole,
ideally
not
uphold,
but
improve,
get
better
right,
make
it
better.
So
it
is
better
for
all
of
us.
We
ask
the
board
to
reject
the
multiple
variances.
A
great
beautiful
home
can
be
built
on
the
slot,
just
as
it
is
robert
o'hara
jackson,
leach.
I
I
The
second
letter
that
you
just
read
is
from
a
house
a
duplex
across
the
street,
which
is
a
duplex
in
a
single
family
neighborhood.
So
let's
take
that
as
it
is.
Thank
you.
B
A
E
Current
zoning
rs1
motion
to
consider
a
variance
from
lane
development
code
sections,
34-336,
e1c1
for
a
front
yard;
setback
of
14
feet
in
lieu
of
25
feet;
minimum
34,
34-336
e1c2
for
cyber
setbacks
of
6
feet
in
lieu
of
10
feet;
minimum
34-336
e1c3
for
a
rear
yard;
setback
of
7
feet
in
lieu
of
30
feet;
minimum
and
e1e
for
49
lot
coverage
in
lieu
of
35
maximum
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
new
single
family.
Drawing.
B
J
D
Is
that
17
feet.
J
D
J
J
D
A
J
A
Yeah,
I
was
just
thinking
and
I
got
a
question
for
the
city
again.
How
blind
is
a
fire
truck.
G
If
the
entrance
to
the
dwelling
is
located
more
than
50
feet
away
from
the
public
right-of-way,
they
have
to
install
fire
sprinklers
by
code,
which
this
is
not
applicable
in
this
situation,
because
they
are
close
enough
to
the
street
for
emergency
personnel
to
respond.
G
B
G
J
You
for
in
the
line
of
your
thinking
also
the
florida
building,
though,
has
a
ten
foot
separation
between
buildings
before
you
have
to
get
into
if
you're
anything
less
than
10
feet
between
buildings,
you
get
into
fire
rating
and
walls
et
cetera,
so
we're
exceeding
that.
D
E
E
E
J
E
And
have
you
I
know
there
was
no
correspondence,
but
have
you
spoken
with
the
neighbors
about
the
project?
No
there's
only
one
on
the
one
side.
A
D
E
But
seeing
the
the
proposed
drawing.
C
You're
talking
a
very
small
lot
50
by
70
and
added
to
that,
it's
kind
of
tangled
forget
the
proper
term.
For
that
alone,
I
don't
remember
my
sixth
grade
math
anymore.
E
B
A
E
We
approve
doa
number
21-10028
as
discussed
because
it
meets
the
standards
of
our
land
development
code.
Second,.
C
B
H
Yes,
when
we
purchased
the
house,
the
builder
didn't
allow
us
for
any
improvements
of
the
lion
and
with
the
way
that
the
building
is
on
the
side,
yard,
pull
pull
towards
on
the
right
side.
And
then
we
also
have
very
mature
palm
trees
that
we
did
not
want
to
take
down.
So
that
is
the
reason
for
the
offsets.
D
I
guess
I
guess
the
reason
you
ask
for
the
three
feet
in
the
on
the
east
side,
where
the
spa
is
because
of
the
trees,
because
it
just
seems
like
there's
an
enormous
opportunity
not
to
get
that
close
yeah
yeah.
That's.
H
D
H
D
D
D
B
A
Yes,
your
request
has
been
approved
if
presented
and
discussed
our
next
item
in
business
is
that
our
next
meeting
will
be
on
tuesday
may
the
4th
there
are
five
cases
scheduled.