►
From YouTube: Board Of Adjustment Meeting (10/18/2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
B
A
Who
is
not
an
applicant
or
agent
who
wishes
to
speak
will
need
to
fill
out
a
speaker's
card
located
on
the
side
table
by
the
door
and
turn
them
into
the
park.
Each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
on
each
item
once
once
we
open
the
public
hearing,
please
refrain
from
speaking
from
the
audience
and
a
follower
cheering
will
not
be
allowed.
And,
lastly,
please
silence
your
cell
phones.
A
Board
members,
can
we
move
on
to
the
approval
of
minutes
from
the
October
4th
meeting.
C
Property
address
1019
24th
Street
North
motion
to
consider
34-337,
e1c2
for
side
yard,
setback
of
12
feet
a
little
15
feet;
minimum
for
a
primary
structure;
34-337
e11e
for
a
lot
coverage
of
45
and
a
little
35
maximum
34-337
e1g
for
accessory
setback
of
zero
feet
in
lieu
of
five
feet;
minimum
along
the
southern
property
line
for
a
paper
or
patio
and
walkway,
and
to
rectify
existing
non-conformities
and
allow
for
a
substantial
Improvement.
An
existing.
A
D
A
E
A
E
E
Flooding
in
my
backyard
because
I
live
on
the
last
Road
along
the
intercoastal
and
when
they
built
the
roads,
they
didn't
build
drainage
back
there.
So
my
backyard
fills
up
with
about
a
foot
and
a
half
of
water,
so
I
have
bricks
that
have
holes
in
them
in
that
backyard.
That
they're
referring
to
and.
C
How
about
the
the
backyard
patio
did?
You
have
a
permit
when
you
did
the
backyard
patio?
It
was
interesting.
D
E
D
E
A
And
when
moving
the
pavers
five
feet
back
from
the
edge
of
your
property
line,
kind
of
accomplish
the
same
goal,
because
the
request
with
regards
to
that
rear
paper
patio
is
that
they're
currently
set
at
zero
feet
from
from
the
property
line
when
they
need
to
be
per
code.
Five
feet.
E
D
E
E
About
what
is
the
walkway
standard?
Excuse
me.
A
It's
really
the
the
request
is
for
accessory
setback
of
zero
feed
and
move
five
feet
minimum
along
the
southern
property
line.
So,
for
example,
at
that
portion
of
your
request
is
not
approved,
then,
basically,
by
default
you
would
not
be
allowed
to
have
anything
with
the
zero
setback
you
would
have
to
comply
to
code
in
that
yeah.
E
I've
had
a
pointer,
I
would
show
you
there's
basically
because
of
the
way
in
Section
8
when
they
paid
the
roads,
they
didn't
do
sidewalks,
they
didn't
do
drainage,
they
didn't
do
curves
back
there.
So
when
the
water
comes
going
flowing
West
to
the
intercoastal,
because
there's
pools
on
both
houses
for
my
South,
the
water
comes
right
between
my
house
and
right
there,
where
the
fat
that
corner
is
of
the
road.
There
is
a
creek
that
comes
in
that
in
high
tide
and
almost
approaches
where
the
Foreigner
is
right
now.
E
So
my
problem
is
that
I
I
even
need
to
walk
in
my
backyard.
It's
almost
unusable
because
there's
no
drainage
back
there
and
the
water,
because
there
are
schools
that
have
been
permitted
by
the
city
on
both
this
house
immediately
to
the
South
and
the
one
to
the
South.
They
both
have
pools
it's
in
the
water
straight
between
my
house
and
that's
why
I'm
asking
for
that
that
consideration
to
have
that
setback
is
zero
because
I
it
floods
completely
up
to
a
foot
and
a
half
to
two
feet
just
because
of
the
nature.
E
E
That
doesn't
impact
them
at
all,
in
fact,
because
my
neighbor
to
the
South
until
after
me,
the
Section
8
wasn't
built
very
I
was
one
I
was
probably
the
fifth
house
on
that,
and
so
the
Builder
that
came
in
no
disrespect
to
him
that
built
with
two
houses
to
the
south
of
me
until
they
are
higher
elevation
than
my
house
and
the
city
allowed
them
to
build
that
and
I
it's
they're
higher
than
me.
E
You
can
go
down
our
street
and
see
where
the
houses
that
were
built
in
the
80s
and
the
ones
even
earlier
are
lower.
But
the
house
to
the
south
of
me
is
considerably
higher
because
the
Builder
brought
in
dirt
to
build
the
two
houses
immediately
to
myself,
which
causes
the
water
to
go
into
my
yard,
because
there's
no
real
drainage
back
there.
D
E
Did
I
did
about
the
same
period
of
time?
Yes,
sir,
when
do
you
know
when
that
was
done
it?
It
could
be
15
years
ago
it
could
be
10
years
ago
in
the
concrete
driveway
that
that's
always
been
there
right.
Concrete
driveway
has
been
there.
In
fact,
when
the
city
came
back
and
paid,
and
the
city
came
back
and
did
something
they
actually
put
the
driveway
the
end
of
it
on
y'all's
easement.
So
yes,
that
driveway
has
always
been
there.
E
Remember
in
the
80s
when
I
built
it
that
whole
area
was
slave
and
it
created
a
bunch
of
dust
and
somehow
the
city
without
curves
drainage,
sewer,
the
the
government
allowed
them
to
pave
those
roads
back
in
section
A
to
as
dust
controlled
and
it's
a
mess
back
there
with
flooding,
sometimes
because
of
the
different
elevations
of
the
times.
E
E
G
D
Sure
yeah,
maybe
it
isn't
the
same
so
where
it
says
under
existing
conditions,
to
vza
number
28-88
for
a
combined
side,
yard
setback
of
14
feet
or
seven
per
side
in
lieu
of
15
feet
seems
to
conflict
if
I'm
reading
it
correctly
with
the
12
people,
so.
G
The
what
I
determined
looking
at
the
original
various
site
plan
versus
what
was
actually
constructed
is
there
ended
up
being
a
difference
between
the
between
the
proposed
site
plan
and
the
actual
construction.
So
they
went
from
having
what
should
have
been
14
feet.
Setbacks
based
on
the
survey
ended
up
B12
so
to
try
and
correct
that
issue.
We
included
it
in
this
request.
G
G
E
Of
what
happens
if
the
city
led
me
to
the
setbacks,
my
home,
the
footprint
is
obviously
larger
than
what
would
have
been
normally
put
that
substandard
lot
and
I
feel
like
I'm
in
a
rock
and
a
hard
place,
because
in
Ada
I,
don't
know
as
much
as
I
do
now.
God
blesses
us
with
knowledge
as
we
get
older,
but
I
feel
like
that.
I
I
haven't
added
anything
to
my
home
and
it's
the
same
plan
that
I
had
in
the
Ada
and
I
want
to
bring
it
back
to
conformities.
E
But
I'm
asking
you
to
approve
these
these
the
setbacks
as
they
are,
and
the
45
lot
coverage
I
see
many
of
my
homes
and
my
neighborhood
that
have
pools
that
have
much
more
than
45
life
coverage
and
two
wrongs
don't
make
a
right.
But
you
know
I'm
just
asking
what
my
other
neighbors
have
without
adding
a
pool
with
building
something
that
obviously
was
put
in
a
substandard
lot.
Originally
and
I.
Don't
know
how
to
correct
that.
Besides
asking
you
to
approve.
A
A
Hearing
no
one
I
will
now
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
the
item
back
to
the
board
for
discussion.
Is
there
a
motion?
I.
C
C
A
Think
the
criteria,
one
kind
of
speaks
to
the
reason
that
he
needs
that
additional
variance,
because
it's
kind
of
helping
to
mitigate
some
flooding,
that's
particular
to
his
partial
plan.
So
if
he
were
to
not
be
able
to
have
that
paint
area
any
more,
then
that
would
kind
of
cause
a
good
hardship.
C
And
and
I
think
it's
been
there
since
almost
1988.
A
Right,
so
that
was
my
only
question
and
I:
don't
know
that
it
influences
my
opinion
that
much
but
Christian.
Why
is
it
that
home
was
the
staff
report
said
that
who
was
constructed
prior
to
the
adoption
of
the
current
Land
Development
code,
but
he
did
need
to
get.
He
did
have
a
variance
for
the
side
yard
setbacks.
Is
it
just?
There
was
code
at
the
time
it
just
wasn't
correct,
yeah.
G
G
Well,
the
plays
that
were
in
the
original
variants
didn't
include
the
a
papers,
it
just
included:
a
driveway,
the
walkway
and
the
small
Tech
okay.
A
And
that
should
be
Brown's
job
for
him,
but
by
my
math
I
think.
If
this
were
a
standard
lot,
he
would
be
at
like
30
percent
law
coverage
or
something
running.
C
A
Excellent
show
any
further
discussion.
B
A
E
A
A
A
H
H
H
Kind
of
issues
when
we
were
when
we
had
requested
the
permit
those
came
back
as
a
stipulation
as
far
as
being
able
to
get
our
Co
for
when
the.
When
the
build
is
completed,
we
had
to
have
these
Conformity
either
management
or
requests
or
advance
for
the
support
of
these
issues,
so
they
weren't
brought
up.
F
G
G
Structure
of
what
the
cost
of
something
along,
no
those
parts
of
the
lines
aren't
accurate.
The
survey
is
okay,
so
this
structure
here
has
a
zero
setback
to
the
rear
property
line.
That
is
two
feet
over
here,
because
it's
been
expanded
a
little
bit.
This
one
has
five
feet
here:
nine
feet
here
and
then
there's
an
overhang
here
that
has
two
feet.
According
to
the
survey
here,.
H
And
that's
actually
not
a
Frank
structure.
That's
just
a
cycle
freestanding
like
pergola,
except
design.
H
G
H
H
A
H
Structures
were
added,
so
I
do
know
that
the
the
side
pergola,
the
long
structure
has
been
there
for
roughly,
like
I,
said
20
to
probably
25
years.
The
back
corner
lot
of
the
back
corner
of
the
that
would
be
the
right
hand
side
of
the
lot.
That
is
actually
the
shed
that
was
put
there
for
the
process
of
clearing.
H
F
F
D
G
Would
be
an
acceptable
alternative?
Those
are
the
two
options.
Basically
because
you
don't
approve
it
yeah
it's
worth
noting,
because
I
don't
think
you
can
clearly
see
it
here.
There
is
a
alley
back
here
as
well,
so
they
are
not
actually
putting
a
direct
property
to
the
rear.
D
A
H
Corner
pre-existing
slab,
that's
been
there
for
roughly
that
25
to
roughly
plus
years
also-
and
we
put
a
small
little
heart
art
shed
kind
of
feels
like
a
small
in
my
mom
does
like
artwork
or
pottery.
H
F
Now
are
both
of
those
backyard
structures.
Structures
both
excuse
me
are
both
the
accessory
structures
in
the
back.
Yes,
on
a
concrete
slab,
you
gotta
say.
A
Any
other
questions
for
the
applicant
for
now,
but
you
can
be
seated
for
the
time
being
and
I'll
not
open
to
public
hearing.
Do
we
have
any
speakers
cards.
D
C
C
Beach
Florida
hi,
Dory
Rogers,
a
neighbor
of
the
the
applicant's
family
for
40
years,
would
like
to
offer
my
support
in
favor
of
accepting
the
above
reference
variance.
The
existing
structures
are
no
way
obtrusive
or
intrusive.
C
The
second
one
is
from
Fred
Helton
533
12th
Avenue
South
Jackson,
Beach
Florida,
to
whom
it
may
concern
I
forgot,
Milton,
the
next
door
neighbor
and
the
applicant's
family
for
about
four
years.
I
would
like
to
support
them
in
their
Endeavor
to
keep
the
existing
structure,
including
the
above
variants.
Consideration
matters
greatly
appreciated
and
the
last
one
is
from
Terry
and
Lynn
Lee
515
12th,
Avenue,
South,
Jax,
Beach,
Florida
I
believe
they
may
concern.
We
are
Terry
and
Lynn
Lee
neighbors
of
the
applicants
since
October
1982.
A
C
A
F
D
A
Also,
the
fact
that
I
mean
I
know
that
a
lot
is
particularly
large,
but
I
think
it
speaks
to
it
that
even
with
these
accessory
structures,
they're
well
under
the
block
coverage
requirements,
I
think
it
would
be
a
different
story
if.
B
A
Were
driving
up
the
law
coverage
but
I
think
it's
meeting
that
criteria
of
the
minimum
use
criteria
by
random
variants
is
the
minimum
variance
required
any
further
discussion.
All
right.
Can
we
have
a
roll
call
vote.
Please.
A
E
D
F
A
I
know
that
there
were
no
sort
of
renderings
or
plans
included,
but
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
you
are
planning
to
build
with
any
backyard
kind
of
build
out
like
a
deck
or
a
paper,
or
you
know
a
slab
or
anything
like
that,
as
well
as
with
the
driveway.
Are
you?
Is
this
percentage
giving
you
like?
It's.
F
Maybe
because
it's
giving
us
what
we've
asked
for
as
far
as
the
driveway
walkways,
we
have
one
place
in
the
back
where
we
have
a
place
to
park
with
golf
cars
inside
the
garage,
we
were
going
to
do
a
little
ramp
to
get
in
because
of
the
height
of
the
household,
so
you're
not
jumping
up
over
a
big
12
piece
thing
and
that's
that's.
Basically,
it
we're
not
looking
to
do
a
deck
because
it
does
have
a
built.
You
know
patio
in
the
back
already.
D
F
I
D
F
I
You've
just
been
sold
by
Jacksonville
Beach
to
the
developer
and
maybe
another
developer.
So
all
the
Lots
I'm,
my
home,
is
the
one
at
the
bottom
left,
and
so
my
concern
is
through
the
question
for
the
developer.
If
he
increases
the
size
of
the
lot,
is
there
a
limitation
to
the
height
of
the
structure?
Yes,
this
could
be
a
limitation,
so
we
won't
see
a
three-story
home
with
a
deck
on
the
top.
That
has
a
view
of
the
beach
that
we've
seen
in
Jacksonville
Beach.
D
I
Right
and
my
concern
is
a
lot
behind
it's
just
unclear.
It
isn't
part
of
this
proposal
tonight.
I.
Imagine
that's
forthcoming.
Someone
will
be
standing
here,
saying.
I
want
approval
to
build
on
lot,
I,
think
it's
Lots,
eight
and
nine
or
yeah
eight
nine
in
that
area,
and
so
when
they
look
out
my
backyard
and
I
see
no
more
trees
and
they
see
all
the
birds
have
disappeared
and
all
the
wildlife
is
gone
kind
of
concerned
about.
What's
going
to
take
its
place
now
and
and
also
you
know,
just
for
all
well-being.
I
F
A
I
Okay,
but
again,
I
have
the
Assurance
is
that
the
height
limitation,
won't
change
and
I'll
be
aware,
look
out
to
see
if
there's
any
other
variances
that
come
here
that
might
affect
what's
going
on
behind
my
house.
Thank
you.
In
fact,
we
could
not
change
that
35
foot
I'm
like
even
if
people
has
to
have
it
done.
A
A
All
right,
sir,
would
you
like
to
come
up
and
address
any
of
the
comments
made.
F
There's
a
little
purchase
where
he's
I
plan
to
build
it
too.
So
is
all
right.
A
C
C
D
A
D
A
E
A
I've
had
them
would
the
applicant
please
come
forward
to
give
your
testimony.
You
won't
need
to
be
sworn
in
again
since
you
just
worked
and
please
proceeds.
F
A
Yes,
I
believe
somebody
said
it's
a
two-part
this
week
buy
one
get
one.
Yes,.
A
You
could
be
seated
and
I
will
now
open
the
public
hearing.
I
need
to
keep
this
cards
on
this
one.
No.
A
A
C
A
G
Just
a
reminder
that
we
have
the
competently
development
code
Workshop
coming
up
for
you
guys
and
Planning
Commission
next
week,
which
will
be
Thursday
at
6
p.m.
In
this
room
for
the
community
redevelopment
Association
board
the
CRA
board,
this
Thursday,
which
you're
welcome
to
attend
this
early
geared
towards
their
perspective,
mostly
on
downtown.
But
these
are
all
open
the
bottle
up
and
you
guys
are
walking
to
a
down
all
of
them.
We
had
the
first
meeting
with
the
citizens
last
week.
Another
huge
turnout.
G
We
didn't
get
a
lot
of
useful
feedback
from
the
folks
that
were
there,
the
Consultants
came
and
explained
the
process
which
will
have
their
input.
That
presentation
is
on
the
website
for
the
project.
So
if
you
want
to
go
and
look
at
that,
can
I
get
a
precursor
the
kind
of
questions
they're
going
to
ask,
but
yeah
I
think
it's
going
pretty
well
and
everybody
can
intend
on
the
27th
anyway.
So
I've.
G
Yes,
the
Consultants
are
structured
it.
The
first
45
minutes
was
kind
of
their
presentation
and
then
the
rest
of
the
time
was
really
going
through
their
questions
and
taking
feedback.
I'm
sure
it'll
be
a
little
bit
different
because
you
guys
are
too
bored.
Maybe
they
have
some
more
targeted
questions,
but
one
year
can
provide
input
at
any
point
through
us
or
you
know
the
email
address
that
they
have,
but
yeah
I
think
you
can.
You
know
attend
as
much
as
you
can
and
I
think
you
can
leave.
That's
fine.