►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (01/07/2020)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
C
Current
zoning
is
Rs
2
motion
to
consider
the
City
of
Jacksonville
Beach
land,
another
than
Code
sections,
34
33,
7
e
1c
f-14,
a
front
yard
of
9.8
feet
in
the
20
feet:
30
40
s,
3
3,
7
e
1,
C,
3,
4,
Riddhi
articles
of
6.8
feet
in
little
30
feet
of
wire
and
34
33
7
e
1
e
4
52%
block
covers
a
little
3,
5
or
7
maximums.
To
allow
for
substantial
improvements
from
an
existing
single-family.
B
D
E
D
F
G
Raj
any
flat-leaf
room
addition
was
built,
approximately
I
would
say
1980
the
person
that
owned
the
house
at
the
time
would,
but
with
he
was
the
supervisor
of
Parks
and
Recreation
near
Jacksonville,
Beach
and
I'm,
assuming
he
applied
for
the
permit
for
the
dream
additions,
and
it
was
great
Tommy
who
does
not
want
to
increase
the
footprint
it
already.
Is
this
all?
He
wants
to
do
put
a
second
story
on
this
building.
G
E
E
C
C
Ace
number
boa
one
number
191,
zeros
2:06,
the
applicant
owner
is
Matthew
belt
hammer
and
Sarah
tickles
property
address
is
38
69
Grand
Boulevard
parcel
IDs
one,
eight
one:
three,
nine,
six:
zero,
zero
zero
legal
description
of
my
20
block,
14
Ocean
Terrace
current
zoning
is
an
RS
one.
The
motion
to
consider
is
the
City
of
Jacksonville
beast
landed
on
that
code.
Sections
34,
3,
3,
6
e
1
e
4
49.8%
block
covers
in
lieu
of
35
percent
maximum
to
allow
for
a
pool
of
vapor
addition
to
existing
family.
A
B
H
H
So
the
hardship
with
this
law
is
substandard
size
as
an
RS
one
is
owning,
which
is
supposed
to
be
kind
of
housing
swear
piece.
Our
lot
is
at
66
30,
so
it's
below
the
required
minimum
in
terms
of
smart
footage
and
in
terms
of
the
width
which
it
leads
us
to
be.
Thank
you
via
the
property
line
and
artist.
E
A
E
B
A
C
As
certainly
east
number
boa
number
1
9
1,
0-0
207,
the
applicant
is
Mark
Whittle
on
earth
is
Mark,
endeavor
will
light
estate
property
address,
3,
4,
7,
7
3rd
Street.
South
parcel
idea
is
one
eight
zero,
six
one:
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
legal
description
lot
to
block
18
Atlantic
Shores
unit
number
one.
Current
zoning
is
an
artist
one
motion
to
consider
the
City
of
Jacksonville
Beach
land
development
code,
sections
34,
three,
three
six.
B
F
F
A
B
Yeah
awesome,
yes,
Scott
Cummings,
yes,.
B
C
C
Current
zoning
is
an
RM
to
consider
the
City
of
Jacksonville
Beach
9
development
code,
sections,
34,
3,
4,
0
e
3,
C,
dot,
2
for
an
easterly
side
yard
at
four
point:
seven
feet
and
a
westerly
side
yard
at
six
point:
five:
eight
in
lieu
of
ten
feet:
minimum
and
thirty
four
three
0e3
seat
back
three
for
a
year.
Excuse
me
where
we
are
15
feet
in
those
30
feet
required
to
allow
for
a
dwelling
unit.
Addition
in
existing
multifamily.
B
I
And
the
configuration
originally
loves:
do
you
have
the
detached
mother-in-law
quarters
in
the
back
behind
the
house
and
then
have
the
pools
beyond
that?
But
as
we
worked
with
our
architects
capre
who
is
here,
we
found
that
doing
that
with
the
house
was
going
to
be
cost
prohibitive,
and
then
the
idea
to
push
this
in
feedback
and
to
the
back
yard
setback
and
set
the
mother's
quarters
15
foot
off
the
back
property
line
where
there
is
now
an
existing
detach,
auxilary
garage
back
there.
I
I
Anybody
that
we
found
in
the
process
of
construction
design
and
bidding
that
taking
the
roof
off
they
added
another
structure
with
this
might
be
prohibitive
for
us
to
do
that,
and
then,
when
we
decided
to
shoot
this,
this
back
and
kind
of
make
it
more
of
a
integrated
functioning
Center
for
the
cool.
That's
what
we
decided
to
put
in
an
application.
A
A
I
Writing
we
discovered,
as
we
were
standing
up
here
in
front
of
y'all
last
night,
that
the
survey
had
been
read
wrong
and
that
we
all
our
attention
was
originally,
but
it
doesn't
have
the
existing
structure
acknowledged,
but
when
they
read
that
that
existing
structure
and
the
surveyor
had
done
is
give
a
dimension
from
the
front
yard.
To
these
steps
in
the
front.
F
F
F
C
E
I
Garage
is
actually
bigger
than
what's
showing
on
that
survey
over
the
older
survey
that
I
supply,
but
there's
more
to
it,
didn't
see.
The
pictures
I've
got
the
dimension
of
the
day
and
still
insider
permissible
to
tax
auxilary
structure
setbacks,
but
it's
seven
feet
off
the
property
binding.
So
we
approved
the
house.
E
E
B
J
J
E
K
B
A
K
Nice
a
question
this
awesome.
My
wife
was
here
last
time
check
flower
business
a
couple
of
days
ago,
where
she
was
gonna,
be
here
again,
where
I
think
you
have
a
paper
work
around.
You
I
thought
he
said
you
can
amend
stuff
because
you
told
us
to
you
told
her.
Cuz
I
was
out
of
town
last
night
who
daily
bird,
probably
paperwork.
She
said
there
was
amendments,
but
then
I
found
out
deal
with
the
city,
because
no
such
thing
is
my
menu
I.
E
E
K
E
K
K
To
is
going
to
be
fifty
three
and
a
half
feet
wide.
That's.
Why
are
the
synapses
in
Marsh
landing,
which
is
fine,
they're
gonna,
be
my
biggest
thing?
Is
they
get
this
footprint
and
they
can
build
up
which
I
have
they're?
Probably
building
up?
If
they're
gonna
build
up,
go
three
stories:
I
make
their
lives
plenty
big
enough,
there's
no
hardship
the
hardship
in
the
writing
in
the
city
ahead.
Room
was
her.
Art
ship
was
a
nice
story.
Hundred
thirty
foot
tall
building
behind
I'm.
K
Looking
at
a
pool
to
me,
that's
not
a
hardship,
so
you've
got
half
their
lot
goes
from.
So
basically
a
fifty
three
and
a
half
feet
wide.
Half
that
around
sixty
two
feet.
Deep.
They
kicks
in
fifteen
feet
to
fifty
feet,
I
mean
that's
a
huge
lie.
You
can
build
whatever
you
want
your
dream
over
what
everyone
within
the
parameters
that
Jax
beach
guidelines
have
you
know
for
somebody
looking
over
at
your.
K
K
To
develop
a
have
a
problem
with
anybody,
but
whether
you
give
them
this
footprint
as
well
as
only
you
guys
know,
they
can
go
up
35
feet
with
this
big,
huge
monstrosity,
presumably
in
a
13,000
square
foot
building,
because
once
they
get
it,
they
walk
away.
They
can
build
whatever
they
want.
So
what
you
got
to
take
that
into
consideration
all
I'm
asking
is
I,
definitely
don't
feel
like
they
did.
The
back
and
hardship.
K
That's
fine.
This
is
a
huge
structure
up
front.
That's
fine
see
it
says:
two-story
existing
only
part
of
the
story.
The
far
right
on
that
you've
got
rough,
which
is
fine,
like
I,
said
I'm,
not
mad,
but
I'm
not
mad
about
anything
I'm
cool
with
everybody.
My
thing
is:
is
it's
not
as
huge
and
if
you've,
given
that
big
book,
but
they
can
do
with
everything
like
I
said
I'm
not
opposed
to
that,
but
they
should
get.
K
That
lot
is
plenty
big
enough
to
build
a
massive
Daddy
structure
within
the
code
within
the
parameters
of
Jax
beach.
That's
it
that's
all
I'm,
saying
I,
you
know,
there's
some
weird
stuff
going
on
here.
I,
don't
know,
I
have
a
feeling
there's
going
to
be
a
big
multifamily,
three-story
structure
going
up
there
sooner
or
later,
but
maybe,
if
I'm
wrong,
I'm
wrong.
But
this
is
just
my
sister
to
architect-
and
this
is
just
I
know
it's
the
minimal.
You
have
to
do
I
just
think
they're
trying
to
get
a
big
footprint.
K
That's
fine,
actually
see
no
hardship.
I've
been
here
for
various
before
I
had
March.
You
don't
have
a
hardship.
The
other
one
at
the
end
of
the
block
and
I'll
hand
it
with
this
and
by
the
way
they
haven't
lived
there.
40
years,
I
haven't
seen
him
in
25
years,
I've
seen
yesterday.
Okay,
so
evident
living
in
a
house
for
40
years
other
than
a
street
for
35
years.
I
built
that
place
15
years
ago,
never
saw
one
time,
maybe
100
coming
to
do
it
a
couple
times
a
year.
K
That's
it
so,
for
40
years
I've
been
living
there
and
then
I
live
there
35
my
lifelong
Beach
resident,
sir.
That's
not
the
question.
I
would
just
thank
you
they.
This
is
where
else
they
say:
okay,
this
law,
which
would
be
on
the
corner
of
6th
and
7th.
It
is
137
South,
sixth
Avenue
parcel
number
175,
9
5
5,
2,
0,
0,
1
0.
They
got
a
side,
the
side
yards
of
7.5
feet
which
is
2.5
beyond
10
and
nothing
in
the
rear,
and
they
built
a
one
and
a
half
million
dollar.
Building
there.
K
That's
now
Airbnb,
which
I
have
the
problem
with
their
set
of
them
on
our
street.
Now
so
that's
another
reason
and
they
did
get
a
side
yard,
a
factor
of
setback.
So
now
I
guess
that's
three
story
to
decide.
We
have
bet
and
I'll
be
able
to
hand.
My
coffee
out,
the
window.
I
didn't
realize
that's
just
crazy.
Fifty
three
and
a
half
wide
by
40
feet.
Deep.
If
you
add
that
up
and
have
a
circular
drug
typical
swear
cleaners
right
now
is
going
became
$300
with
$336
of
square
feet.
K
That's
why
I
really
feel
like
this
has
been
to
be
developed
into
a
big
multifamily
structure
which,
like
I,
said
I,
have
no
problem
with
as
long
as
it's
within
the
frame.
Is
there
a
lot
bigger
anybody
within
that
whole
square
block
and
anyway,
by
the
way,
as
far
as
the
hardship
of
the
building
I'll
leave
it
at
this,
that
Lily
130
feet
tall.
It
is
less
than
50
feet
away,
maybe
55
feet
away
from
this
building.
K
B
L
L
Molho
1
2,
3,
sixth
Avenue
South,
would
it
be
just
kind
of
dovetailing
off
with
Lukas,
and
he
basically,
you
know
a
lot
of
the
things
that
concerns
as
far
as
the
footprint
they
currently
have
a
lot
size
that
they
have
a
65
feet
and
the
footprint
that's
in
place
should
be
sufficient
for
whatever
they
need
to
do
back
there
and
then
it's
a
hardship
and
it's
based
on
the
back
structure
and
the
condo,
the
dinosaurs
I,
behind
it
being
the
hardship
there's
other
horses
in
life,
I
think
that's
one.
That's
that
classifies.
L
L
B
F
F
C
Will
be
the
second
time
I've
appeared
before
you
do
various
requests
for
this
property?
First
time
the
front
yard
setback
of
750
people
of
20
feet
was
a
major
point
of
opposition.
A
measuring
area
was
uncovered
that
determined
no
hardship
existed.
Therefore,
it
was
stuff
from
the
request.
Stroke
excuse
me.
I
was
not
in
opposition
to.
J
C
Their
variances
as
long
as
the
property
owner
would
be
required
to
build
what
they
had
been
presented
to
the
board.
I
simply
asked
it.
Would
the
property
owner
be
required
to
build
with
that
presented
in
order
to
keep
the
variance
sylvia
Oswalt
confirmative
round
2?
We
are
here
again
tonight
to
review
a
new
and
much
different
request
for
various
few
things
really
concern
me
about
this
request.
This
round,
the
site
plan
presented
is
far
more
vague
as
to
the
end
result
of
the
construction
of
the
Delilah's.
They
are
now
asking
for
side.
C
There
are
variances
from
the
front
all
the
way
to
the
rear
of
the
property,
as
well
as
a
rear
yard.
Setback
at
15
feet,
low
Authority.
The
site
plan
implies
a
significant
amount
of
block
coverage.
The
interesting
observation
is
that
the
mother
would
have
to
park
at
the
front
of
the
property
and
walk
out
to
our
guest
house,
either
down
the
side
of
the
property
or
through
the
main
house.
C
At
this
juncture,
on
the
most
of
all
the
variances
are
being
requested,
there
is
no
hardship
that
would
necessitate
a
rear
yard
variance
outside
the
standard.
Obtaining
that
variance
would
not
provide
any
additional
privacy
from
a
90
story.
Title
also
based
upon
the
property
owners,
written
statement
and
her
application
for
variance
also
like
to
confirm.
C
Otherwise,
it
seems
like
a
flimsy
attempt
to
obtain
erroneous,
variances
and
LOC
coverage
for
purposes
of
developing
this
property
and
commercial
multi-family
structure
that
she
provides.
The
exact
same
thing
that
we're
all
seeing
this
evening
with
the
application
for
variance
sitting.
This
was
continued
about
being
presented
to
get
the
variance
the
privacy
from
the
nine-story
building
the
site
plans.
They
would
like.
An
amendment
requirement
has
presented
there's
pictures
survey
that
you're
all
seeing
up
about
and
their
statements
on
here.