►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (06/15/2021)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
C
B
C
D
E
F
John
atkins
1888,
fosling
jacksonville
beach
hardship
is
each
one
of
these.
Lots
is
undersized
for
the
rm2
zoning
minimum
lot
size.
Rn2
sony
is
60
feet
wide
and
and
6000
square
feet.
Excuse
me,
and
so
that's
the
hardship,
and
what
we're
proposing
here
is
to
combine
these
three
lots
and
instead
of
coming
in
and
asking
for
individual
variances
on
each
individual
lot
and
building
a
duplex
on
each
slot,
combine
them
build
the
four
in
the
pattern
of
what
we've
done
several
times,
20
times
around
the
city.
F
Again.
This
is
three
lots
of
record.
There
also
is
just
I've
started
you've
driven
down
there,
there's
no
access
to
either
any
of
these
lots
right
now,
so
we'll
be
putting
in
road
and
water
and
sewer
along
gordon
avenue.
Extending
that
to
these
lots
to
make
them
accessible,
because
they're
really
not
accessible
the
two
that
are
facing
21st,
there's
a
big,
ditch
there,
drainage
ditch
so
it's
inaccessible
really
from
from
21st,
and
the
road,
as
you
can
see,
ends
before
the
last
slot.
F
So
our
ships
again
we're
gonna,
also
try
to
do
two
stories
instead
of
three
and
we're
not
asking
for
a
lot
of
coverage
so
many
times,
and
unfortunately,
jeff
is
not
here.
Who
always
asks
me
for
my
renderings,
which
I
have,
if
you
care
to
have
them.
F
I
noticed
that
last
night
about
seven
o'clock
when
I
went
and
talked
to
some
of
the
neighbors
directly
behind
on
gale
avenue
and
yeah.
I
noticed
that
last
night
yeah
so,
but
but
the
properties
really
are
just
to
the
north,
correct
they're
to
the
north
of
that
where
it
was
out
in
front
of
that
and,
as
you
know,.
G
F
Everything's
been
built
up,
but
yeah
we'll
have
to
meet
all
the
requirements
of
the
planning
and
I'll
play
in
the
barbershop
public
works
department.
This
will
also
have
to
do
in
our
planned
development
review
because
of
the
way
we're
putting
four
here.
So
it
has
to
go
through
the
whole
plant
development
review
process,
with
the
planning
department
and
the
public
works
and
building
department.
F
It's
kind
of
concurrent,
it's
been
I've,
been
told
by
heather
and
bill
in
the
past
that
we
can
do
that
concurrently,
but
either
way.
F
And
again
I
may
be
speaking
out
a
term
christian
could
probably
tell
you.
I've
done
the
planning
commission
several
times
for
this
exact
same
plan
and
it's
never
been
an
issue
so.
F
You
know,
there's
a
hardship
there,
so
whether
this
gets
developed,
whether
it
gets
developed
as
individual
lots
or
as
a
larger
parcel
assembled
there's
going
to
be
a
hardship
because
there's
planets
lots
are
smaller
than
platinum
record
per
the
land
development.
Could
we
could
do
up
to
nine
units
on
this?
F
C
So
when
you
extend
gordon
gordon
yes
thank
you
when
you
extend
gordon,
you
will
not
extend
it
all
the
way
to
the
21st
that
will
neither
set
the
21st
because,
as
you
see.
F
H
So
in
essence,
if
you
chose
to
approve
the
variance
tonight,
it
wouldn't
go
into
effect
until
the
re-plaque
was
approved,
so
it
would
basically
be
contingent
on
that
now.
However,
if
they
were
in
a
situation
where
you
did
not
yet
then
that
might
actually
affect
the
replot
going
forward.
So
it
probably
does
make
some
sense
to
consider
the
dimensional
issues
ahead
of
time.
H
Or
we
will
go
again,
he
could
still
go
before
the
athletic
commission,
but
he
wouldn't
have
relief
from
the
dimensional
standards
so
what
he
actually
builds
or
how
he
builds
it
may
be
different.
He
may
choose
not
to
move
forward
with
the
reply
at
that
point
because
it
wouldn't
necessarily
fit
the
design.
D
I
D
E
I
So
the
verbiage
here
is
a
little
bit
by
hardship
as
far
as
the
impervious
calculation,
I
would
say
that
it's
probably
you
know
not
being
able
to
have
any
kind
of
effecting
around
the
portal
would
be
a
hardship
because
I'm
not
sure
what
to
do
next.
As
far
as
the
body
decking
that
you
would
be
able
to
get
to
and
from
the
pool
safely
on,
so
we
would
want
some
kind
of
a
hard
surface
that
we
could
not
transfer.
I
You
know
third
degree
microscopy
and
things
like
that
back
and
forth
you're
already
choosing
your
light
is
undersized.
Okay,
yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Yeah
yeah,
and
I
I
think
I
mentioned
something
like
that
due
to
the
size
of
the
of
the
lot
that
it
is
difficult
to
appropriately
determine.
I
And
so
the
impervious
calculation
was
based
on
minimal
decking
that
we
want.
You
know
we're
not
looking
to
cover
the
entire
back
backyard
and
in
fact,
I
believe
what
our
current
infamous
calculation
is
at
55
and
we're
looking
at
removing
a
large
portion
of
that.
We
currently
have
back
there
as
well
as
favors,
and
so
we
would
like
to
state
as
much
within
the
guidelines
that
the
city
has
set,
and
that
is
where
we
kind
of
ended
up
at
those
43.
D
C
B
Special
conditions
and
stuff
that
exists
each
other
submarines
which
is
not
applicable
to
other
parcels
lands
searchers
are
building
okay.
Second,.
A
Alex
and
gonzalez
yes,
lance's
runnington
start
coming.
Yes,
currently,
yes,.
B
B
E
J
Basically,
just
that
I
mean
we
wanted
to
build
a
pool
and,
for
safety
reasons
wanted
to
have
a
sunset
around
it.
Our
lot
is
a
corner
bot
and
just
because
of
the
way
the
builders
built,
the
other
two
houses
on
the
sides
of
us.
This
would
maintain
the
most
value
of
our
house
and
just
make
things
as
safe
as
possible.
J
So
there
are
some
pavers
already
our
neighbor
to
one
side,
their
house
is
actually
somehow
illegally
set
back
some.
There
is
a
newer
construction
and
the
construction
people
actually
set
it
back
a
little
bit
too
much.
So
we
actually
have
like
just
an
odd
shaped
yard
and
a
little
bit
less
yard.
We
do.
Most
of
our
yard
is
actually
outside
of
our
lot
and
it's
city
property
that
we
maintain
just
on
the
outside
of
our
fence
and
around
it.
J
B
B
D
The
board
calls
case
number
boa
number
21-10074
applicant
owner
jack
and
megan
dunn
property
address,
3338,
isabella
boulevard,
parcel
id
1-80819-4219
legal
description,
lot,
12
block
10
ocean
view
highlands.
Current
zoning
rs2
motion
to
consider
are
variants
from
lean
development
code
sections,
34-336
e1e
for
49.9
block
coverage
45
previously
approved
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
paper
patio
deck
edition
around
a
coping
only
pool
to
an
existing
single-family
body.
E
K
Yeah,
so
we
we
have
an
enterprise
lot
and
we're
requesting
the
49.9
lot
coverage
and
move
the
current
45
percent
just
for
allow
for
modest
decking
around
our
swimming
pool
that
we're
building.
This
isn't
standing
with
current
approved
coverages
to
single-family
homes
in
the
area,
49.9
percent
to
257
horn
street
and
49
to
3376
isabella
boulevard.
K
K
Why
didn't
you
ask
for
this
when
you
were
for
your
first,
when
we
built
the
house
five
years
ago?
The
current
standard
at
that
time
is
45
with
the
new
standards
that
are
around
our
area
going
into
the
49
and
above
we
want
to
just
get
a
little
bit
more
to
make
it
safer
for
our
kids
that
way,
they're
not
running
into
dirt.
D
C
C
H
Through
the
chair,
so
this
is
actually
something
that
we've
discovered.
There
are
a
handful
of
properties
that
there's
a
discrepancy
between
one
map,
the
historic
map
and
more
current
maps.
It
is
rs1,
but
I
think
navigation
was
taken
in
depending
on
which
map
you're
looking
at
it
was
rs2.
But
rs1
is
the
correct
zone.
Category
okay,.