►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (10/05/2021)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
A
A
A
number
of
the
members
of
the
board
will
not
have
that.
Maybe
yes,
sir.
C
That's
a
very
good
question
and
if
you
guys
aren't
comfortable
and
you
want
to
put
it
to
the
next
meaning,
we
can
certainly
do
some
research,
yes,
sir,
because
it
is
I
do
realize
when
I
was
looking
at
the
mr
cummings
is
no
longer
on
the
board.
C
A
A
We
still
do
have
the
approval
of
the
september
21st.
Maybe
I'd
be
glad
to
entertain
a
motion.
A
E
Yes,
sir,
so
the
code
has
a
one-year
moratory
among
reapplications
applications
or
for
requests
that
are
denied
by
the
board.
There
are
a
couple
of
provisions
in
chapter
153
that
allow
for
a
request
for
re-hearing
before
the
board.
In
essence,
they
can
meet
certain
criteria
and,
if
you
agree,
a
vote
of
four
members
of
the
board
would
allow
that
applicant
to
then
reapply
for
the
variance
before
that
one
year
moratorium
is
complete.
So
in
this
case
the
applicant
would
have
to
wait
until
july
of
next
year
with
a
positive
vote
from
the
board.
E
They
can
apply
for
the
next
available
hearing.
At
that
point,
you
would
hold
a
new
public
hearing
on
the
new
site
plan,
a
new
request,
so
there
would
be
an
opportunity
for
the
public
to
come
and
speak
at
that
point.
There
would
be
you
hear
new
notices
sent
out
a
new
ad
in
the
paper
who
signed
all
the
typical
things
an
applicant
would
go
through,
so
it
would
be
a
typical
public
hearing
at
that
point.
Okay,.
A
F
E
Basically,
in
the
code,
they
have
the
option
of
submitting
a
revised
site
plan
and
request
that
they
feel
addresses
the
concerns
that
the
board
raised
in
the
denial
period.
So
they
would
present
that
case
to
you
tonight
and
if
you
agree,
then
you'll
you'll
hear
the
request
from
the
applicant
right
here
right,
but
you
won't
hear
the
case
of
the
new
application
until
they
go
through
the
process.
It's
a
procedural
hearing,
basically.
E
A
C
H
Yes,
sir,
and
if
I
may
just
repeat
some
of
what
christian
said,
but
the
code
has
two
provisions
that
allow
for
an
application
prior
to
the
one
year
expiry
you
can,
you
can
prepare
an
application,
that's
25
percent,
less
intense
than
the
original
application
or,
alternatively,
you
can
prepare
an
application
that
meets
the
issues
that
were
raised
at
the
original
hearing.
I
didn't
have
the
benefit
of
being
in
the
original
hearing,
but
I
have
the
transcript
from
that
hearing,
and
so
I
prepared
the
application.
Based
on
what
the
transcript
said.
H
There
were
three
issues
that
were
raised
as
as
to
the
objections
one
was
the
driveway
link.
We've
extended
that
we
prepared
a
new
application
in
the
new
application.
We've
extended
the
driveway
length
to
18
feet,
as
was
requested
in
the
in
the
hearing
and
fanned
out
the
driveway
from
one
to
two
lanes
to
ensure
that
parked
cars
were
not
in
feed
lines
site.
So
that
was
one
of
those.
The
the
objections
was
the
was
the
driveway
link
and
fanning
it
out.
H
The
the
other
issue,
or
a
second
issue
I
identified
that
was
raised-
is
there
there's
cantilevered
floors
over
the
top
and
there
was
a
complaint
about
the
length
of
the
cantilevered
floors.
So
we
have
reduced
the
cantilever
by
50
percent
I'll,
be
in
the
cantilever's
only
two
feet,
so
we've
gone
back
in
another
foot,
so
the
cantilever
now
is
just
one
foot.
That
was
the
other
issue
that
I
identified
on
the
record
and
then
the
third
one
was
a
setback
on
one
side.
H
So
we've
now
shifted
the
house
to
the
north
property
line
to
provide
more
state,
a
more
setback
adjacent
to
21st
avenue.
That
was
where
the
that
was
where
the
the
issue
that
was
running
so
we've
now
moved
the
setback
from
which
it
was
at
four
feet.
We
now
move
it
back
to
eight
feet
of
that
location,
so
those
were
the
three
items
that
I
identified
from
reading
the
transcript
again,
I
wasn't
in
attendance
at
the
at
the
meeting,
but
I
I
believe
I
believed
all
of
the
issues
that
were
raised
at
that
meeting.
H
A
Board,
as
as
the
code
allows
when
you
meet
the
the
objections
that
are
raised
well,
you
have
to
meet
the
objections
that
are
raised
and
you
also
need
to
get
the
approval
of
the
four
members
of
this
board.
H
H
That
you
can
cure
one
is,
as
I
said,
25
less
intensity
than
you
have
before
that
really
doesn't
entire
situation
or
you
can
raise
the
respond
to
the
the
objections
that
were
raised
and
then
your
you
certainly
are
in
a
position
which
is
your
role
to
determine
whether
or
not
that
we
would
we've
addressed
the
issues
that
were
raised,
give
us
the
opportunity
to
come
back
and
and
be
rehearsed.
H
I
I
guess,
if
there
are
issues
that
I
missed
from
looking
at
the
transcript
that
you
identified,
that
we
could
additionally
identify
at
the
next
hearing,
I
would
be
happy
to
do
that
and
I
would
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
know
what
those
are
I
I'll
try
to
be
diligent
in
identifying
them
all.
But
if
someone
has
a
recollection
different
than
the
that
I've
reclaimed
from
the
transcript
I'm
happy
to
make
sure.
I
address
that.
If
I
get
the
opportunity
to
read
here.
H
G
So
during
the
during
the
hearing
there
was
a
discussion
about
the
total
watch
about
the
total,
montage.
Sorry
and.
G
H
A
G
Well,
I
would,
I
would
point
out
on
order
that
what
the
statute
says
is
in
determining
whether
or
not
we
should
grant
the
recent
middle
is
that
the
applicant
expressly
satisfies
the
deficiencies
that
were
identified
in
the
prior
command.
So
the
testimony
of
this
man
is
that
he
has
corrected
it.
He's
identified
three
of
the
deficiencies
and
he's
corrected
it.
So
what
I
simply
want
to
know
is
what
is
it
corrected
too,
and
so
did
he
meet
the
statutory
requirements
that
the
deficiencies
were
identified
and
expressly
satisfied.
F
G
Too,
I
guess
it
would
be
five
feet:
okay,
so
that
said
now,
okay
and
then,
and-
and
so
your
your
testimony,
then,
is
in
support
that
that
has
expressly
satisfied
the
deficiency
that
was
needed.
Yes,
sir
okay
and
then
the
last
one
is
the
the
setback.
H
G
D
This
email
is
from
janelle
wilson
october
5th.
Please
vote
no
on
allowing
a
re-hearing
without
waiting
for
the
one-year
mandated
time
on
the
property
at
zero,
21st
avenue
south
from
the
information
presented.
This
is
still
an
overreach
and
the
variances
requested.
This
is
a
busy
street
that
the
community
uses
to
access
the
beach
with
a
lot
of
pedestrian
traffic.
The
lack
of
adequate
setbacks
impede
the
line
of
sight
for
vehicles
that
speed
down
first
street,
thus
endangering
pedestrians.
D
It
also
is
an
infringement
on
the
privacy
of
the
adjacent
property,
with
only
a
six
foot
rear
setback.
Thanks
for
your
consideration
of
the
surrounding
neighbors,
and
then
there
was
a
reply
all
to
that.
That
says
I
agree,
vote
no
too
many
variances
being
granted
buster
bragg,
2002
oceanfront
south,
and
then
there
is
another
letter
from
september
30th,
dear
board
of
adjustment
members,
I
have
been
a
jacksonville
beach
resident
since
1999..
D
I
live
at
3318
ocean
drive
the
lot
immediately
south
of
3306
ocean
drive.
South
mr
bruce
is
a
developer
in
this
area
and
my
neighbor
other
neighbors,
and
I
have
discussed
experience
with
him.
I
had
some
concerns
regarding
the
property
being
so
close,
especially
since
the
developer
will
be
selling
the
home
when
it
is
completed.
D
H
E
C
C
I
I've
looked
at
the
new
drawings
and
I
got
a
couple
questions
myself.
I
see
where
he
did
away
with
the
two
foot.
Cantilevers
made
it
one
foot,
but
he's
managed
to
jam
the
house
back
into
that
back
corner
a
little
farther
where
he
now
only
has
the
two
foot
property
line
on
the
north
side
and
on
the
left
side.
It's
now
actually
a
foot
closer
to
my
house
and.
I
They
were
one
house,
that's
why,
on
the
north
side
of
my
house
is
about
a
six-inch
property
pine
they
were
connected.
There
was
a
catwalk
across
and
the
lady
lived
upstairs
at
my
house,
our
house
and
cooked
up
there.
That
was
the
only
kitchen
in
the
house
and
then
house.
Next
to
it
was
she
would
go
across
and
went
upstairs
downstairs.
I
I
That's
why
you
look
at
that
aerial
view
of
my
house
and
it's
so
close
to
the
neighbors
house.
They
were
connected
at
one
time,
so
I
didn't.
I
didn't
get
a
variance
on
the
board
for
that
property
line.
It
was
inherited
now
when
we
added
our
garage
on
years
ago.
We
came
in
front
of
this
board
and
we
tried
to.
I
We
tried
to
put
the
back
of
the
garage
with
that
side,
but
that
house-
and
they
said
no
at
some
point
in
time-
there
has
to
be
corrections
here,
so
our
garage
is
set
off,
not
six
inches
or
whatever
the
property
line.
It's
about
six
six
or
something
like
that.
I
forget
my
side
that
borders
the
border
up
to
their
house.
I'm
ten
foot,
six
from
my
property
line,
which
is
their
property
amount.
I
They
want
to
come
six
foot
two
and
then,
if
you
can't
leave
her
out
with
that.
Second
third,
four
quarts
now
they're
five
foot
two,
so
that's
where
I'm
at
with
that.
It's
to
me
it's
a
little
too
close.
All
they
managed
to
do
is
just
kind
of
jam
that
house
into
that
corner
of
that
lock,
they've
done
nothing
to
the
slab.
They
tweaked
the
driveway
a
little
bit,
but
they
just
got
to
switch
back.
A
I
I
J
D
I
just
have
one
question
for
christian:
if
we
do
vote
to,
let
them
come
back
before
the
year
is
up.
They
can
continue
to
work
on
their
proposal
before
then.
They
could
reduce
lot
size.
They
can
make
additional
changes
between
tonight
and
when
they
come
back,
if
they
social,
they
can
certainly
make
it
less
intense
yeah.
Basically.
E
E
D
Has
has
addressed
the
grievances
from
the
last
hearing.
B
D
D
For
lot
coverage
of
57
percent
in
lieu
of
35
maximum
50,
previously
approved
and
34-340
e1h
for
a
side
yard
setback
of
zero
feet
in
lieu
of
two
feet:
minimum
for
construction
of
a
walkway
and
34-373-d
for
a
parking
area.
Setback
of
3.16
feet
in
lieu
of
5
feet;
minimum
to
allow
for
an
additional
parking
area
for
an
existing
two-family
dwelling.
A
G
An
over
improvement
of
the
land
in
an
attempt
to
make
it
a
little
more
accessible
and
a
little
safety
or
a
little
safer.
From
our
perspective,
it
seems
as
if
we've
had
a
bit
of
a
hard
time
getting
permits,
approved
or
finding
the
right
way
to
go
through
the
permanent
approval
process.
Throughout
this
entire
ordeal.
G
In
march
of
last
year,
our
client
was
directed
to
obtain
a
right-of-way
permit
to
get
this
project
approved,
which
he
did,
but
it
turns
out
that
that
was
the
incorrect
permit
to
to
try
to
to
get
this
project
completed.
Nonetheless,
his
non-compliance
with
the
current
variance
exception,
was
not
out
of
you,
know
bad
faith
or
anything.
He
simply
tried
to
do
it
one
way
and
it
turns
out.
Procedurally,
he
might
have
been
incorrect.
G
You
know
armed
with
his
new
permit,
which
was
granted.
He
went
about
pursuing
this
project
and
nearing
the
end
of
it.
He
was
attacked
with
this
claim
that
he
seemingly
over
improved
the
project.
So
what
the
project
has
done
is
it
has
made
the
current
property
more
accessible,
it's
made
it
safer
to
use
and
it's
made
it
more
aesthetically
pleasing
within
the
or
at
least
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
of
the
neighborhood.
K
All
right,
so
so,
basically,
I'm
just
going
to
I
get
what
I
can
start
with.
I
suppose,
can
I
ask
you
to
fold
that
in
his
hand,
I
always
have
trouble
with
this?
Is
better
okay,
all
right.
So
I
guess
what
I
can
start
with
is
a
little
bit
of
a
brief
timeline
as
to
how
we
got
here.
I
purchased
this
home.
Today's
25
in
2015.
K
didn't
really
know
much
about
the
permitting
process.
However,
I
did
see
that
my
neighbor-
I
don't
know
if
you
have
any
photos
here,
but
I've
got
some
pictures
that
I'll
submit
for
the
record.
K
My
neighbor
basically
essentially
had
the
same
exact
improvement
done
to
the
property
and
our
homes
are
like
near
each
other
in
terms
of
it's
a
two-story
duplex
and
I'm
on
the
right
side
of
the
two-story
duplex
he's
on
the
left
side.
What's
in
between
our
houses,
is
sort
of
almost
like
a
weird
image:
there's
different
utilities
on
either
side,
but
it's
essentially
sort
of
a
mirror
image.
You
could
argue
the
measurements
and
whatnot.
I
do
know
that
we
don't
have
a
five
foot.
We
don't
have
five
feet
between
each
other's
homes.
K
We
don't
have
ten
feet
tall.
Essentially
we
don't
have
the
five
foot
easement
that's
necessary,
especially
between
our
kc
units,
so
that's
kind
of
how
all
this
began.
K
This
improvement
had
already
been
made
at
another
house
next
to
me,
been
there
for
almost
two
years
city
never
said
anything.
There
was
never
any
violation
notice,
so
I
asked
my
neighbor:
what
did
you
do
like?
What
permits
do
you
need
to
apply
for?
I
followed
his
example.
K
K
I
don't
remember
receiving
any
such
notices,
okay
of
stopping
work,
and
I
only
was
notified
that
there
was
some
that
we
were
not
in
compliance
after
the
project
was
completed.
So,
in
addition,
I
can
give
you
the
reasons
why
I
decided
to
do
this.
Essentially,
this
is
a
walkway.
That's
on
my
own
private
property.
K
I
have
the
home
that
it's
adjacent
to
the
only
area
that
it
will
affect
that
individuals
here
tonight
and
you
know
basically
what
I
the
reason
that
it
was
put
in
was
for
several
different
reasons
for
improvement,
so
one
this
prevents
hazards
such
as
tripping
bug
bites.
I've
actually
had
children,
that's
what
this
is
a
walkway.
Essentially
that
goes
back
to
a
shower.
K
That's
on
the
side
of
the
house,
so
you
know
someone
coming
from
the
beach
for
whatever
reason,
and
it's
also
an
access
point
for
people.
If
I
have
a
roommate
or
someone
who
lives
on
that
first
floor,
that
that's
a
way
for
that
person
to
get
into
the
home
okay,
so
they
go
through
the
front
door.
They
can
go
through
the
back
door,
actually
that
backyard
outdoor
area
is
usually
sort
of
declared
there's.
K
In
the
event
I
have
roommates,
which
I
have
briefly
before
I
do
on
and
off
have
roommates,
so
that
sort
of
first
floor
area
is
theirs.
So
without
this
improvement
being
in
place,
what
you're
going
to
have-
and
I've
had
examples
of
this
before,
but
I
myself
have
stepped
on
glass
made.
My
foot
bleed
it's
grass,
okay,
what
you
have
is
you
see
the
grass
or
dirt
it's
a
mud
pit,
so
you
can't
really
see
what's
in
there
when
you're
walking
back
to
that
shower
access
or
that
backyard
area.
K
In
addition,
that
same
hazard
has
happened
to
children,
you
know
if
I
had
roommates
or
airbnb
customers
there
at
risk
as
well.
In
addition,
it
the
space
between
my
house
and
the
adjacent
neighbor,
there's
not
enough
room,
like
I
said
as
far
as
the
5-foot
requirement
goes.
If
I
do
have
some
photos
here
since
I
guess
we
don't
have
any
photos
in
the
record
here
and
I'll
submit
these
for
the
record.
Whenever.
K
A
K
It
into
the
record
I
mean,
so
might
I
also
iterate
that
this
entire
project
is
permeable
to
permeable
flavors?
It's
a
walkway,
it's
a
sidewalk,
there's
no
sort
of
you
know
it's
not
we're
not
talking
about
a
statue
here,
but
essentially
just
to
continue
like
going
through.
Why
this
is
an
improvement
is
because,
as
far
as
the
space
requirement
between
our
respective
homes,
there's
not
enough
room
to
build
a
sidewalk
in
between
our
houses
and
as
especially,
if
you
see
in
the
boat
between
the
ac
units,
it
gets
even
narrower.
K
You
probably
only
have
less
than
four
feet
between
those
ac
units,
not
even
well,
I'm
being
a
little
generous.
I
guess
for
my
own,
but
before
this
was
installed,
there
also
was
not
enough
sunlight.
So,
basically
the
way
our
houses
are
oriented,
the
sun
only
gets
about
an
hour
or
two
per
day
passing
through,
so
that
area
remains
a
wetland
it
also
it
stays
very
muddy.
K
Okay
and
it
becomes
very
disastrous
to
handle.
I
had
a
lot
of
overgrowth
of
vegetation
as
well
that
resulted
in
sprinkler
heads
breaking
off
and
I
had.
I
have
had
to
spend
80
every
few
months
per
sprinkler
head,
getting
them
fixed
every
single
time
it
busted
and
busted
off
and
and
in
just
this
little
narrow
strip
of
land.
I
have
an
entire
backyard.
That's
all
across
there's
no
lot
coverage
in
that
backyard.
I
like
my
neighbor
by
the
way
who
has
a
pool
okay,
my
neighbor
in
the
beginning.
B
B
K
Well,
I
mean
if
a
pool
doesn't
come
in
the
lock
coverage.
You
know,
I
guess
what
I
can
say
is
there
are
papers
around
that
pool.
So
there
is
a
lot
of
coverage
in
that
backyard.
I'm
not
familiar
with
the
percentage
coverage
as
far
as
what
they
have,
but
they
have
been
granted
that
special
amenity
I've
had
but
neighbor
on
the
other
side.
Who's
also
been
granted
amenities
as
well.
Okay,
including
zero
escape
in
the
front
of
their
yards.
K
A
You're
making
the
case
that,
because
of
the
limited
sunlight
and
the
there's
cover
that
you
can't
do
much
with,
that,
constitutes
a
hardship
that
would
be
correctable
in
a
manner
which
sounds
like
you
did.
Yes,.
K
K
Well
in
it
well,
in
addition,
I,
as
far
as
like,
if
someone
were
to
be
disabled,
like
my,
for
example,
this
doesn't
happen
very
often
okay,
but
I
do
have
a
94
year
old
grandmother
that
visits
you
know
every
few
years
in
a
wheelchair,
you
know,
and
so
there's
no
way
to
get
somebody
on
a
wheelchair.
Back
to
that
area.
K
Okay,
I
mean,
unless
you
are
well
there's
a
step,
there's
a
step
at
the
front
door.
I
mean,
I
guess
you
could,
but
the
thing
is
like
around
that
back
area.
Okay,
if
you
I
mean
it's
just
kind
of
like
a
logistical
thing
where,
if
someone's
getting
back
to
that
shower
area,
then
you
generally
speaking,
you
go
that
way
unless
you
can
attract
her
through
the
house.
K
So
like
essentially
like
one
of
the
things
I
just
want
to
say
is
this:
this
isn't
affecting
anyone
else's
property,
I'm
not
sure
if
there
were
any
complaint
letters
submitted.
I
guess
we'll
hear
about
that,
but
the
person
whose
property
it
is
adjacent
to-
and
it
does
touch
is
here
tonight
and
they'll-
have
their
own
words
to
say.
K
Moreover,
for
the
city
as
well,
the
city
saves
a
ton
of
water.
By
having
this
in
place,
it
made
up
half
of
all
the
sprinkler
heads
on
this
property.
Okay,
like
I
said
they
would
bust
all
the
time.
They'd
have
to
be
replaced
all
the
time.
This
was
just
simply
much
easier.
Moreover,
when
we
put
in
this
installment,
I
spoke
with
different
departments
of
the
city.
As
far
as
the
utilities
from
underneath
this
area,
there's
only
sewage
and
then
there's
electrical
I
had
electrical
come
out,
gave
me
recommendation.
K
They
spoke
to
me
and
my
neighbor.
We
did
what
they
said
as
far
as
like
being
able
to
make
it
so
that
they
can
access
the
electrical
box.
There
was
sewage,
you'll,
see
in
the
photos,
there's
a
sewage
pop-up
access
for
both
sewage
pop-ups.
We
did
exactly
what
the
city
said.
Everything
else
is
not
belongs
to
the
city.
That's
underneath
there,
it's
just
a
t
and
comcast.
K
I
ran
pipes
for
them.
You
know
and
they're
all
taken
care
of
as
well,
so
you
know
that
you
can
run
cable
there
as
far
as
water
lines.
Water
lines
do
not
run
underneath
this.
Okay,
the
water
access
does
not
run
underneath
this
particular
area.
Moreover,
you're
going
to
see
between
our
houses,
there's
this
gravel
slit
and
we
have
our
own
dedicated
drain
that
where,
as
far
as
both
of
these
locks
being
permeable,
both
of
these
driveway
extensions
will
have
water
run
to
that
drain
and
it
has
its
own
dedicated
drain.
K
K
We
have
drainage
running
from
our
own
homes
as
well,
so
you've
got
three
pop-ups
at
the
end
of
that
street
and
you'll
see
that
in
the
photos.
So
you
know
we
did
everything
we
could
to
stay
on
the
same
page
with
the
city
and
installing
this
I
think
what
happened
is
one
in
the
beginning,
I
feel
like
I
was
business
led
by
the
city
and
that
I
came
to
the
planning
department
twice
I
was
told
everything's.
Okay,
I
got
my
right-of-way
permit.
K
I
also
saw
that
the
neighbor
had
also
done
the
same
thing
that
I
essentially
done
and
had
not
had
anything
said
to
him
by
the
city
for
years.
So
I
just
was
following
an
example-
and
we
put
this
in
by
the
way
that
neither
of
these
two
installments
have
ever
ever
ever
to
my
knowledge,
bothered
anyone
again
we'll
see
if
there's
any
complaints
but
basically
undoing
this.
I
don't
know
what
problem
that'll
solve.
K
K
Okay-
and
that's
essentially
where
we
are
okay,
is
this
in
every
way
is
an
improvement
that
will
take
things
to
the
next
level
in
terms
of
helping
the
city
and
in
helping
the
home
as
a
whole
be
more
accessible,
and
I
just
don't
think
that
removing
it
removing
it
would
do
would
do
one
thing
it
certainly
would
it
would
cost
me
the
money
that
I
saved
for
five
years.
K
Is
that
correct,
correct
now,
as
far
as,
if
I
may
just
say
one
thing
about
the
50,
that
was
the
coverage
when
we
bought
the
house,
I
inherited
that
the
builder
secured
that
50.
I
had
no
knowledge
of
this
information
at
the
point
of
purchase.
G
On
your
submission,
there's
a
package
that
discusses
these
tremoron
bolt
down
permeable
papers
is
that
what's
in
use
right
now,
I'm
sorry
is
that
what
you
use
for
this
path
that
you
made
trimron.
K
Permeable
papers
we've
got
six
to
eight
inches
underneath
of
permeability.
As
far
as
I'm
sorry,
my
question
is:
did
you
use.
G
G
E
Since
the
work
wasn't
permitted,
there's
a
engineer
required
installation
process
for
permeability
for
the
manufacturer.
We
didn't
inspect
it,
so
we
can't
count
it
as
lot
coverage
because
we
have
no
way
to
verify
that
other
than
destructive
inspections,
basically
where
they
would
have
to
remove
it
to
see
how
it
was
installed.
You
would
have
to.
D
D
E
Up
to
50,
I
believe
that
these
are
specified
at
10.5,
so
if
they
were
solved
correctly,
they
would
get
that.
E
E
Yes,
you
may
have
noticed
in
your
pack:
it's
not
really
clear.
It
is
only
dealing
with
the
private
property,
but
there's
a
basically
an
additional
portion
here,
that's
in
the
right
way,
it's
like
a
parking
area.
K
Right,
yes,
the
installation
specs.
I
know
this
probably
isn't
enough
to
satisfy
like
an
inspection
or
something
like
that,
but
within.
K
D
There
was
also
a
letter
in
the
packet
from
the
applicant.
Would
the
applicant
wish
to
have
this
read
into
the
record,
or
does
it
pretty
much
cover
what
you
already
spoke
to?
No,
that
litter.
B
D
Yes,
I
see
it's
from
may
so
then,
moving
on
j,
mike
boyles
of
104
10th
avenue
north
wishes
to
address
the
board
in
support
of
the
agenda
item.
C
Sir,
if
I
could
have
you
raise
your
right
hand,
do
you
swear
or
affirm
to
the
testimony
about
giving
this
matter
is
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth
to
help
your
dog
and
I
don't
make
it
difficult
I'll.
Need
you
to
say
your
name
and
ask
you
for
the
record
and
you'll
have
to
speak
loudly.
Please
jesse.
L
L
L
L
If
we
were
in
every
saw
apartment
and
that
had
to
be
kept
in
mind
with
the
hardship
of
the
short
distance
between
the
walkways
when
it
comes
to
the
pavers
in
the
front
we
had
to
have
our
hardship
is
all
along
10th
avenue,
north
from
friday,
through
sunday,
sometimes
into
monday
cars
line
up
all
down
that
stream
block
our
driveway,
it's
near
impossible
for
people
to
back
out
of
any
of
these
driveways.
We
have
cops
down
there
all
the
time
I
can
show
you
police
reports.
L
I
can
show
you
accidents
reports
of
twice
my
dad
trying
to
back
out
the
driveway
and
hit
a
car,
because
he's
a
70
year
old
guy
that
doesn't
look
in
his
rear-view
mirror,
but
it's
hard
to
get
in
and
out
of
that
driveway.
So
the
hardship
is
we're,
adding
additional
parking
and
we're
making
it
safer
for
our
families
to
get
in
and
out
of
our
driveways.
L
While
our
road
is
cluttered
with
all
these
people
going
to
the
beach
every
weekend,
and
so
those
pavers
are
there
to
extend
it
so
that
we
can
actually
fit
four
cars
in
our
driveway.
So
we've
extended
our
pavers
so
that,
instead
of
having
two
cars
parked
there,
we
can
have
four
cars
parked
there,
which
is
reducing
the
parking
on
the
street.
It's
increasing
parking
for
tourists
and
making
it
safer
for
cars
to
come
in
and
out
of
our
driveway
without
hitting
the
tourists
that
are
parked
on
the
street.
A
A
K
I
would
only
like
to
agree.
I
do
agree
also
that,
as
far
as
parking
goes,
it
does,
in
addition,
help
our
own
properties
be
more
accessible
than
that.
We
can't
stop
our
own
garages
unless
you
have
something
to
decide
like
this
as
well,
but
other
than
that.
I
agree
with
everything
he
said
and
I
do
experience
those
same
hardships.
That's
right.
Thank
you.
F
F
D
Well,
I
agree
and
we
don't
want
to
reward
unpermitted
work,
but
I
would
just
like
to
remind
the
board
that
this
57
is
a
lot,
but
this
is
a
very,
very,
very
severely
undersized
lot.
I
mean
he's
under
50
of
the
minimum
standards
for
that
zoning
district.
D
D
Well,
he
caused
the
fact
that
he's
now
out
of
compliance
with
the
land
development
code,
but
I
don't
agree
that
he
caused
the
overarching
hardship
of
this
loss,
which
is
that
it's
not
even
3
000
square
feet
in
a
minimum.
Dimensional
standard
zoning
district
of
6
000
square
feet
and
it's
only
32
feet
wide
with
minimum
standard
being
60
feet
that
was
caused
by
whoever
split
the
property
in
half
in
2015
before
the
applicant
purchase
the
property.
D
A
A
D
G
A
D
C
E
Okay,
could
you
please
explain
to
the
board
of
the
nature
of
the
hardship
created
by
your
property?
Yes,
sir,
this
is
a
lot
that
my
wife
and
I
have
under
contract
at
3306
ocean
drive.
E
It
is
an
unusual
lot
for
our
neighborhood.
We
live
on
the
corner
three
doors
away.
It
is
deeper
than
most,
but
narrower
than
most
it's
43
feet
wide,
whereas
almost
every
other
lot
in
our
general
neighborhood
is
50
feet
wide,
but
it's
also
deeper
than
most.
Our
lot
where
we
live,
is
only
84
feet
deep.
This
is
125
feet
deep.
E
So,
according
to
the
current
zoning
laws,
if
we
had
to
adhere
to
the
10
foot
side
setbacks,
this
house
would
only
be
23
feet
wide,
whereas
most
houses
in
our
neighborhood
or
at
least
30
feet
wide.
I
I
don't
think
it's.
I
think
it's
detrimental
to
the
neighborhood
to
be
building
a
house
that
is
now
and
quite
long,
and
I
this
this
variance
would
allow
me
to
build
a
house.
E
That's
29
feet
wide,
which
would
be
more
in
keeping
with
the
neighborhood
and
I've
spoken
with
eight
of
our
neighbors
in
the
general
neighborhood,
where
we
live.
Three
of
those
are
the
adjacent
property
owners,
one
on
the
north,
one
on
the
south
and
one
on
the
west,
and
they
all
have
expressed
their
support
for
this
application.
E
If
I
may
just
add
a
couple
of
the
backers,
I
I
I'm
not
asking
for
any
coverage
of
an
increase,
it's
going
to
be
35,
I'm
not
asking
for
any
the
the
setbacks
from
the
front
will
be
at
least
25
feet
actually
30
feet
and
in
the
back,
it's
going
to
comply
with
the
30
foot
setback.
So
everything
else
is
in
compliance
with
the
zoning
regulations.
D
F
We
agree
with
the
variance
he
has
told
us
that
he
will
build
30
feet
back
from
the
front
row
instead
of
25,
which
will
give
us
better
sight
in
view
from
our
southeast
side
and
also
he
has
said,
he's
not
going
to
apply
for
light
coverage
variances
in
the
future,
because
we
do
have
a
flooding
problem
at
the
fact
that
I've
been
very
familiar
with,
and
that
would
enhance
that
as
if
that
would
aggravate
it
rather
than
improve
it,
and
he's
also
made
assurances
does
about
defendants
and
windows,
and
things
like
that.
D
Dear
board
of
adjustment
members,
I've
been
a
jacksonville
beach
resident
since
1999..
I
live
at
3318
ocean
drive
the
lot
immediately
south
of
3306
ocean
drive.
South
mr
bruce
is
a
developer
in
this
area
and
my
neighbor
other
neighbors,
and
I
have
discussed
this
variance
with
him.
I
have
some
concerns
regarding
the
property
being
so
close,
especially
since
the
developer
will
be
selling
the
home
when
it's
completed.
Mr
bruce
assured
us
that
he
will
ensure
certain
matters
are
addressed.
Number.
M
D
Will
set
the
house
back
off
the
street
30
feet
versus
25
feet
to
ensure
we
and
the
chipper
fields
to
the
north
of
the
property,
maintain
our
view
north
and
south
number?
Two.
We
understand
that
mr
bruce
is
not
requesting
a
coverage
variance.
However,
there
is
a
flooding
issue
in
this
particular
spot.
Ocean
drive,
specifically
in
front
of
this
lot,
is
known
to
have
the
worst
street
flooding
in
the
city
of
jacksonville
beach.
D
Already,
whenever
there's
heavy
rain,
a
river
runs
through
the
lot
to
the
back
of
my
house
and
the
house
behind
the
lot
to
compound
the
problem,
the
house
directly
behind
mine,
built
by
same
developer,
has
a
swimming
pool
which
overflows
when
it
rains
heavily
flooding
my
backyard
as
well
as
most
houses
around
us.
The
empty
lot
has
helped
in
absorbing
some
of
the
water,
but
with
a
house
on
it,
the
flooding
can
only
get
worse.
The
developer
verbally
assured
us.
He
will
address
these
drainage
issues
to
ensure
this
flooding
crisis
is
resolved
and
not
compounded.
D
My
house
has
a
rooftop
number
three.
My
house
has
a
rooftop
deck.
Mr
bruce
has
assured
me
that
he
will
not
put
another
rooftop
deck
on
his
property
as
if
the
variance
is
approved,
this
will
severely
impact
any
privacy
for
either
home.
He
has
stated
he
will
have
a
deck
on
the
north
side
of
the
house,
which
will
not
impact
our
privacy.
A
D
Or
sorry
dash
0100
legal
description,
lot:
nine
except
the
west
25
feet
block
118
oceanside
park.
Current
zoning
rs3
motion
to
consider
34-338
e2
c3
for
a
year
rear
yard,
setback
of
15
feet
in
lieu
of
30
feet.
Minimum
and
34-338
e2f
for
46
lot
coverage
in
lieu
of
35
maximum
to
allow
for
the
addition
of
a
rear,
paver
patio
pergola
and
two
paper
pads
to
an
existing
single
family
dwelling.
C
K
Yes,
so
my
wife
and
I
purchased
the
property
last
year
and
when
we
purchased
it,
the
builder
had
to
get
a
variance
for
a
cantilever
balcony
which
would
put
it
at
37
and
we
realized
after
we
already
purchased,
that
there
was
no
way
to
put
in
a
paper
patio.
The
grass
comes
right
up
to
the
the
living
room
doors,
so
we
just
want
to
put
a
patio,
so
we
can
grill
and
sit
out
there
and
that's
why
we're
here.
F
E
Yeah
so
the
there's
a
required
internal
side,
yard
setback
for
the
patio,
which
would
normally
be
5z,
but
they
can
encourage
two,
so
it
would
end
up
being
three
in
this
case.
It
goes
up
to
the
property
line
or
the
fence
between
the
two
units.
So,
if
you're
looking
at
the
site
plan,
this
paper,
patio
here
should
be.
K
There
were
also
several
other
variances
approved
for
very
similar
designs.
One
was
the
adjacent
property
to
mine,
they're
here
tonight
to
speak
and
then
behind
me
as
well.
K
B
C
F
Just
a
comment
regarding
the
setback
of
the
papers
to
the
property
line
eric
and
his
wife
have
small
children
and
but
that
that
wasn't
go
all
the
way
to
the
property
line.
I
just
I
feel
like
there
would
be
a
chance
that
the
children
might
trip.
You
know
that
was
the
edge
of
the
papers
if,
if
there
needed
to
be
some
impervious
material
in
blue
of
the
neighbors
to
the
whole
property
line,
I
think
that
was
his
intention
and
his
very
good
intention
for.
C
B
Name
and
address
for
the
record:
please
katie,
classy
723
12
south.
Thank
you.
I
am
eric
and
amanda's
neighbors.
They
live
in
the
townhouse.
Next
to
me,
I
took
a
look
at
the
outline
this
afternoon
and
discussed
with
them
prior
what
they're
going
to
do,
and
I
think
it's
going
to
add
property
value.
I
think
it's
going
to
look
great
and
just
like
tom
said,
I
think
it's
going
to
be
safer
for
the
kids
too,
because
walking
outside
of
our
townhome
to
drop
down
to
just
to
the
grass.
A
That's
all
the
public
hearing.
Yes,
it
is,
I
close
the
public
hearing
and
bring
the
matter
back.
B
B
D
Legal
description
lot:
5
block
9
pine
grove
unit;
number
4,
current
zoning
rs1
motion
to
consider
34-336
e1c2
for
an
easterly
side;
yard
setback
of
7.6
feet
and
a
westerly
side
yard
setback
of
one
foot,
each
in
lieu
of
10
feet;
minimum
34-336
e1c3
for
a
rear
yard;
setback
of
18
feet
in
lieu
of
30
feet.
Minimum
and
34-336
e1e
for
lock
coverage
of
50.7
in
lieu
of
35
maximum,
all
directed
by
existing
non-conformities,
allow
for
reconfiguration
of
the
driveway
and
for
construction
of
a
new
swimming
pool
with
decking
to
an
existing
single-family
dwelling.
E
E
A
I
Our
hardship
is
that
we're
starting
out
with
a
piece
of
property,
that's
totally
out
of
variance
or
compliance,
I'm
sorry,
and
with
that
we
wanted
to
add
a
pool
to
it.
So
we're
looking
to
add
the
pool
and
we're
going
to
have
to
probably
pull
up
what
you
see
in
the
front
of
the
house,
all
the
driveway
and.
B
I
A
F
I
I
Right
right,
yeah
we're
just
adding
a
little
a
few
more
pavers
in
the
back
to
square
it
off
once
the
pools
are,
and
then
that
would,
of
course
you
know
we
have
to
decrease
the
front
a
little
bit,
which
is,
if
you
came
by.
F
F
I
F
B
I
I
B
B
E
C
Okay,
before
we
have
a
roll
call
who
made
the
mr
curly
made
the
modification
who
seconded
I'm
sorry,
mr
emma,
thank
you.
B
Yes,
john
moorland,
yes,.
A
B
B
B
D
Legal
description,
part
of
william
park,
grant
section
55,
township,
3
south
range
29
east.
Current
zoning
pud
order,
95-7640
motion
to
consider
34-337
for
26
parking
spaces
in
lieu
of
34
spaces
required
to
allow
for
the
expansion
of
the
existing
hospital
facility
by
three
beds
in
an
existing
commercial
building.
M
Okay,
so
we
opened
the
facilities
four
years
ago
and
at
that
time
we
licensed
for
only
19
beds
because
of
the
parking
restrictions
and
since
that
time,
as
you
know,
there's
lots
and
lots
of
more
substance,
abuse
treatment
out
there
and
so
we're
trying
to
increase
by
three
minutes.
The
current
parking
is
only
for
us,
and
so
it's
only
for
employees.
Our
patients
don't
park
there.
Family
members
don't
visit
there,
so
only
employees
park
there,
so
it
would
not
increase
in
the
need
for
other
parking
places.
D
M
It
is
since
it's
a
treatment
facility,
we
need
them
off-site
and
then
an
employee
transports
them
to
the
facility.
They
were
just
in-house
residential,
so
they
stay
there
for
the
entirety
of
their
treatment,
and
then
we
transport
them
back
to
an
off-site
parking
to
meet
their
family
or
whoever
speaking
them.
Okay,.
M
D
Anyway,
have
a
press
desire
to
speak
to
this
issue?
Yes,
deborah
uselman
3148,
st
john's
boulevard,
which
is
to
address
the
board
and
is
opposed
to
the
above
agenda
item.
C
Ma'am,
if
I
could
have
raise
your
right
hand,
do
you
swear
or
thrown
that
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
in
this
manner
is
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but
the
truth
so
help
you
god.
Yes,
if
I
could
have
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
J
J
J
J
J
There
are
containers
from
breweries
bottles
that
end
up
in
that
common
area
or
across
the
grass
area
into
my
backyard.
So
when
my
son
and
I
are
trying
to
sit
there
and
enjoy
dinner
on
our
patio,
we
have
to
listen
to
all
of
this
noise,
which
I
consider
quite
innocent.
J
D
Yes,
just
one
dear
members
of
the
board
of
adjustment,
we
received
the
notice
regarding
the
public
hearing
scheduled
for
october
5th
2021,
where
a
request
for
a
variance
from
sections
34-337
for
26
parking
spaces
in
lieu
of
34
required
parking
spaces
by
the
property
owners
of
1597.
The
greensway
is
being
considered.
Our
business
is
located
at
both
1555,
the
greensway
jck
holdings
llc
and
1579,
the
greensway
greensway
realty
holdings
llc
and
within
300
feet
of
1597
to
greensway.
D
D
Rather,
it
is
a
rehabilitation
facility
seeking
to
expand
its
operation
via
expansion
by
three
beds,
and
the
business
park
is
neither
situated
nor
designed
to
accommodate
this
type
of
growth.
Parking
is
already
extremely
sparse
in
the
business
park
and
traffic
congestion
is
growing.
Many
of
our
neighbors
already
often
overflow,
into
our
parking
spots.
Growth
of
the
facility,
while
reducing
the
number
of
parking
spots,
will
cause
further
parking
restraints
for
adjacent
neighbors
with
increased
overflow
parking.
I
urge
the
board
of
adjustment
to
consider
the
above
and
deny
the
application
for
variants.
D
M
So
for
the
residential,
I
would
only
apologize.
We
have
cameras
outside,
we
do
let
them
have
the
activities
that
she
described.
I
didn't
know
that
it
was
an
interruption
to
neighbors,
but
we
can
certainly
make
that
more
pleasant
for
her
and
we
can
we
put
a
fence
up
when
we
open
so
to
protect
the
side
of
us
that,
I
believe,
is
by
atp,
but
we
can
certainly
do
that
in
the
area
that
she's
talking
about
too
right.
M
Now,
it's
like
a
chain-link
fence,
but
we
could
put
that
white
protection
fence
up
there,
privacy
fence
and
we
can
ask
them
to
move
their
activity
to
the
front
or
inside
or
we
could
do
other
stuff,
it's
just
they
prefer
to
be
outside
when
it's
nice
weather,
like
this,
we
have
cameras
out
there.
So
I'd
be
happy
to
check
those
cameras
and
see
if
any
of
the
other
activities
that
she's
describing.
M
I
don't
doubt
if
she
says
that
it's
true,
but
we
will
certainly
we
will
address
all
of
those
things
I
don't
mind
addressing
it
as
far
as
the
traffic.
I
I
disagree
with
him.
I
understand
the
concern
it
is.
There
are
lots
of
residential
properties
to
the
back
up
there
beyond
us
that
we
would
not
increase
the
traffic.
M
I
understand
that
he
and
we
don't
use
his
parking
place.
We
did
ask
if
we
could
use
a
neighbor's
parking
place
because
we
thought,
before
we
applied
for
this,
that
maybe
we
should
appear
to
hear
and
say:
okay,
we've
got
some
money
and
they'll
give
us
space
if
we
need
it.
But
honestly,
we
do
not
fill
up
our
parking
lot,
even
when
we
have
what
we
call
treatment
team,
which
means
myself
the
doctor
a
nurse
the
case
manager.
All
of
us
are
there
to
talk
and
we
still
have
spaces
left
over.
M
So
the
parking
space,
in
my
mind,
isn't
really
an
issue
and
the
traffic
isn't.
I
do
agree
with
her
that,
if
we're
bothering
her
that
we
should
fix
that.
C
M
Other
properties
that
you
know,
if
we
have
a
problem,
we
try
to
fix
it.
That's
all
we
can
say.
M
J
M
A
D
If
we,
if
we
were
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
this
variance,
I
guess
this
is
a
question
for
the
clerk
or
for
christian.
I
think
it
might
be
appropriate
to
stipulate
that
this
variance
is
confined
to
this
business.
I
think
we've
done
that
before,
because
if
another,
you
know,
quasi
medical
facility
goes
in
there
and
they're
in
a
different
situation
where
they
do
have
visitors
and
they
do
have
patients
driving
then
that
parking
wouldn't
be
adequate
anymore.
D
So,
if
you
do,
can
I
just
say
in
my
motion
that
the
motion
stipulates
that
this
variant
only
applies
to
the
current
tenant.
E
C
D
With
the
stipulation
that
this
variance
is
non-transferable
from
the
current
applicant
based
on
the
standards
for
variants,
as
outlined
in
section
34-286
of
the
lane
development
code,
second
being
moved
and
seconded.
E
Have
a
we
can
get
to
if
you
want
to
email
me.
E
Yes,
I
did
have
a
request
from
the
director.
You
currently
have
a
meeting
scheduled
for
december
21st,
which
is
the
week
of
the
holiday.
E
A
A
I've
commented
on
the
lack
of
respect
for
jewish
holidays.
This
is
another
example
of
that.
D
A
A
I
year
they'll
continue
to
come
up
some
definitely
shown
by
the
city
to
that,
not
that
I'm.