►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (11/02/2021)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
B
D
Legal
description
lot:
2
block
10
pine
grove
unit;
2
current
zoning
rs1
motion
to
consider
34-336
e1c2
for
a
north
side;
yard
setback
of
6.7
feet
in
lieu
of
10
feet.
Minimum
and
south
side
yard
setback
of
7
feet
in
low
of
10
feet,
minimum
and
34-336
e1e
for
a
lot
coverage
of
42
percent
and
we
have
35
maximum
and
34-336
eg
for
an
accessory
structure.
A
Sir,
if
I
could
have
you
raise
your
right
hand
for
me,
do
you
swear
or
affirm
that
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
in
this
matter
is
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing,
but
the
truth
so
help
you,
god,
yes,
and
if
I
have
to
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
you'll
need
to
speak
properly.
Please.
E
E
B
What
are
we
bringing
into
compliance?
What.
E
F
C
B
A
And
I
also
have
to
have
you
raise
your
right
hand,
so
I
can
swear
you
in
before
you
speak.
Do
you
swear
or
affirm
that
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
in
this
matter
is
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing,
but
the
truth
so
help
you,
god
and
if
you
have,
if
I
can
have
you
say
your
name
and
address
for
the
record,
please.
G
G
G
H
C
G
G
B
B
B
D
Legal
description
lot:
12
block
24
replat
unit
number
one
atlantic
shores.
Current
zoning
rs-1
motion
to
consider
34-336
e1c2
for
an
east
corner
side;
yard
setback
of
10
feet
in
lieu
of
20
feet
required
34-336
e1c3
for
a
rear
yard;
setback
of
10
feet
in
lieu
of
30
feet;
minimum
and
34-336
e1e
for
lot
coverage
of
48
in
lieu
of
35
maximum
to
allow
for
the
construction
of
a
new
rear
and
side
addition
to
an
existing
single
family
dwelling.
A
I
The
house
was
built
to
conform,
you
know
to
the
code,
it's
it's
very
awkward
living
space
and
what
we
propose
to
do
is
going
to
really
make
it
much
more
livable
for
the.
I
A
I
D
So
you
mentioned
feeling
in
the
pool
which
I
appreciate
you
clarifying,
because
it
was
a
little
tough
to
tell
that
on
the
site
plan,
but
so
that's
being
filled
in
and
the
addition
will
go
on
top
of
that.
Are
you
adding
on?
Well?
They
have.
I
They
also
want
to
to
do
another
smaller
pool
wherever
they
can
make
it
work.
But
what
what
I
supposed
to
do
is
to
build
a
room
addition.
D
Had
yeah
there's
one,
it's
like.
H
H
I
To
change
the
driveway
you
know,
and
whatever
we
have
to
do,
you
know
to
make
it
where
we
can
do.
The
addition
is
the
biggest
thing
you
know
so
fill
in
the
pool
and
the.
I
Well,
they're
going
to
to
build
another
pool,
so
that
would
allow
them
to
have
you
know
a
little
bit
of
pull.
That
was
the
idea
they
have
their
full
contractor
here.
C
It
stands
you
want
48
and
you're,
telling
us
you're
going
to
put
another
pool
and
and
some
more
tapers
around
the
pool,
that's
going
to
take
you
over.
J
H
J
So
it
includes
everything,
it's
the
full,
solid
new
driveway
and
the
decking
that
we
propose,
but
I
think
what
blake
was
saying
is,
if
you
wanted
us
to
take
it
down
from
48
we'd,
be
happy
to
switch
up
the
driveway.
So
it's
permeable
absolutely.
B
F
F
Will
include
this
area
here.
This
is
shown
as
the
lanai,
the
new
garage
and
then
the
driveway
and
walkway,
so
that
47
48
includes
all
the
lot
coverage
shown,
including
the
existing
pools.
So
that
would
be
a
maximum
when
the
pool
is
redesigned
and
may
end
up
being
smaller
and
they're
now
offering
that
they
can
do
previous
papers
as.
F
B
F
C
D
H
D
I
think
I
could
as
well,
so
I
will
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
voa
number
21-100153.
D
They
can
only
build
up
to
45
percent
and
for
the
rest
of
the
request
to
remain
the
same
as
it
meets
the
standards
of
our
land
development
codes.
K
D
A
J
We
have
a
non-performing
lot.
Our
lot
size
is
actually
only
about
5100
square
feet,
and
so
that's
almost
half
of
the
conforming
lot
size
so
we're
trying
to
increase
our
lock
coverage
just
from
35
to
40
to
allow
for
a
partial
decking
around
our
pool
and
then
additionally,
there's
currently
no
shade
in
the
backyard.
J
G
J
J
B
F
When
they
originally
proposed
the
site
plan,
it
included
that
portion
that's
in
yellow
that
actually
extended
into
the
corner
side
yard,
which
you
can't
have
a
pool
in
the
corner
side.
Here
you
can't
ask
for
a
variance,
so
we
had
them
remove
that
portion
to
comply
with
the
other
standards
for
pools,
which
also
ended
up
reducing
their
body
coverage
slightly.
So
the
request
doesn't
include
that
reduction.
So
40
is,
in
fact
what
they're
asking
for
okay
thanks.
D
F
Actually,
I
think
that
was
just
the
type
of
the
roof
that
they're
adding
over
the
shower
concrete
area
that
they
were
placing
would
be
part
of
the
primary
structure
and
would
reduce
that
rear,
set.
D
For
a
front
yard,
setback
of
15
feet
in
lieu
of
20
feet;
minimum
34-340,
e3
c3
for
a
rear
yard;
setback
of
12
feet
and
with
30
feet.
Minimum
and
34-340
e3g
for
an
accessory
structure.
Setback
of
two
feet
in
lieu
of
five
feet:
minimum
to
allow
for
construction
of
a
new
multi-family
dwelling
and
swimming
pool.
A
Probably
just
me:
okay,
if
I
can
have
you
raise
your
right
hand,
do
you
swear
or
refer
to
the
testimony
you're
about
to
give
in
this
matter
is
the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing,
but
the
truth
so
help
you,
god,
if
I
can
have
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
K
K
C
K
Says
that
they're
multi-family
dwelling
on
that
building,
but
that's
a
it's
just
for
us.
K
Well,
the
multi-family.
There
is
an
existing
two-story
house,
that's
there
that
that
has.
We
have
tenants
there
and
we're
trying
to
build
on
the
east.
D
K
B
C
D
No
cards
but
there's
one
letter:
dear
members
of
the
planning
and
development
department
and
city
council,
I'm
writing
in
opposition
to
the
variance
request,
number
boa
number
21-10088
for
the
property
at
231,
19th
avenue
north
jacks
beach
florida.
The
hearing
is
scheduled
for
november
2nd
and
I
cannot
attend.
I'm
very
concerned
that
if
the
city
of
jacksonville
beach
continues
to
allow
these
significant
variances,
our
residential
areas
will
continue
to
decline
in
visual
appeal
rather
than
improve.
D
The
city
has
set
back
requirements
in
place
so
that
development
can
occur
but
not
impede
on
the
aesthetic,
as
well
as
financial
well-being
of
others
in
the
community.
Placing
large
properties
on
these
small
lots
creates
a
less
than
appealing
view.
My
suggestion
is
that
the
builder
find
a
larger
property
buy
adjoining
property
or
reduce
their
plan
building
size,
so
they
meet
our
building
codes
without
having
a
need
to
ask
for
significant
variances
sincerely
ron,
burnett.
K
Sure
I
I'm
having
a
hard
time
seeing
what
he's
saying
is
such
a
large
building.
All
we're
asking
for
is
an
additional
two
feet
on
one
side
and
two
and
a
half
feet
on
the
other,
just
to
account
for
cantilevers
which
which
are
in
the
air
and
the
footprint
stays
the
same
as
what
you
approved
four
years
ago.
Really,
who
was
that
romber
nest.
K
K
K
The
accessory
setback
we're
asking
for
just
so,
we
can
put
a
pool
and
it
won't
be
a
post-it
stamp.
You
know
we
could
do
a
seven
eight
foot
wide
pool
instead
of
a
four
to
five
foot
point
for
us.
That's
the
only
real
difference.
Okay,.
F
Well,
you
degrading
the
variance
specific
to
this
design,
correct
yeah,
the
this
was
original.
These
are
the
same
plans
that
were
approved
last
time
to
just
the
architect
didn't
include
the
cantilever
in
their
request.
So
in
essence,
it's
always
been
anticipated
in
what
multi-planning
commission
on
the
board
looked
at
last
time,
but
yeah.
H
D
F
That's
correct:
that
was
just
it's
a
very
confusing
part
of
the
code,
because
the
way
it's
written
for
one
unit,
two
units,
three
units
from
multi-family,
I
was
just
trying
to
give
you
guys
a
little
bit
of
a
framing
for
the
discussion,
so
there's
no
requests
for
leftovers
they're
not
exceeding
it.
Yes,
thank
you.
D
C
G
H
G
A
B
My
name
is
coulson.
I
designed
at
one
six
one
four
coquina
place
at
the
beach,
thank
you
and
if
you
could
describe
to
the
board
the
nature
of
the
hardship
created
by
the
property.
Yes,
we
are
attempting
to
add
an
addition
from
mr
giuliano
on
an
effectively
substandard
lot
and
lot,
obviously,
was
the
zoning
orange
change
from
the
time
it
was
built,
and
we
need
to
push
the
push
the
addition
back
along
the
existing
one
of
the
house.