►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting (9/7/2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Thank
you.
The
board
of
adjustment
meetings
are
quasi-judicial
in
nature.
All
decisions
of
the
board
will
be
based
on
competent,
substantial
evidence,
including
testimony
provided
in
this
meeting.
Any
person
who
is
not
an
applicant
or
agent
who
wishes
to
speak
will
need
to
fill
out
a
speaker's
card
located
on
the
side
table
by
the
door
and
turn
them
into
the
clerk.
Each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
on
each
item.
Once
we
open
the
public
hearing,
please
refrain
from
speaking
from
the
audience.
A
Moving
on,
we've
got
the
approval
of
both
august
meeting
minutes.
Do
I
hear
a
motion
to
approve
item.
C
D
E
A
A
Second,
it's
been
moved
and
seconded.
Is
there
any
all
in
favor,
aye,
okay
meeting
minutes
have
been
approved
correspondence
aside
from
any
correspondence
from
individual
agenda
items.
Is
there
any
correspondency
on
that?
No
just
the
stuff
that
was
talking
about
okay
and
there
is
no
old
business
on
tonight's
agenda.
So
moving
on
to
new
business,
can
we
call
first
case.
Please.
A
B
F
On
this,
we're
not
asking
for
any
lock
coverage,
we're
not
asking
for
anything
other
than
a
five
foot
and
little
ten
foot
on
the
one
side,
whereas
it
could
be
five
feet
on
either
side
or
asking
for
five
feet
feeling
these
sites,
and
we
were
here
last
year
and
heard
the
neighbors
and
have
made
some
changes
to
the
plan
to
take
into
consideration.
Some
of
the
neighbors.
F
A
F
It's
actually
a
flip,
so
you'll
see
where
it
says
flip.
I
didn't
flip
the
house
over,
but
it's
got
no
windows
on
the
north
side,
where
some
of
the
neighbors
to
the
north
were
worried
about
privacy
and
their
swimming
pool.
So
there
are
no
windows
on
the
north
side
of
the
house,
so
there
will
be
no
privacy
concerns
at
all.
A
Can
you
you
mentioned
something
about?
You
could
do
five
feet
on
either
side
but
you're
asking
for
both.
Can
you
clarify
what
you
mean
by
that
very.
F
Simply
the
the
code
states
that
that
the
side
setbacks
must
be
a
total
of
15
feet
with
a
five
foot
minimum
on
either
side.
So
we
can
already
go
to
five
feet
on
either
side.
Just
not
both
sides.
It
could
be
seven
half
seven
half
five
and
ten,
so
we're
just
asking
for
a
five
and
five.
So
we're
not
technically
going
any
closer
to
one
side
than
we
could
move
in
the
house
anyway.
G
G
A
B
B
I
Here,
I
guess
olga
goldman
1046
owen
avenue
and
zero
oh
and
average
jacksonville
beach.
So
I'm
speaking
today
because
the
board
has
met
for
the
matter,
19,
tac,
100115
and
21
attack
one
zero,
zero,
zero,
five
nine.
This
meeting
in
2019
asks
for
percentage
coverage
of
the
lot
and
the
setback
of
psycho
yard
variances.
I
The
meeting
in
2021
ask
for
sideyard
setback
only
in
order
for
so
as
per
the
land
development
code,
section
34
tap
two
eight
six,
which
I
know
all
of
you
guys
are
very
familiar
with,
because
you
sit
on
this
board
in
order
for
variants
to
be
granted,
the
petitioner
needs
to
meet
the
six
conditions.
Special
conditions
and
circumstances
exist
which
are
peculiar
to
this
purcell,
and
I
do
not
agree
with
that,
because
I
also
own
the
25
foot
wide
lot.
That's
just
around
the
corner.
I
There's
a
few
members
of
my
neighborhood
that
also
own
25
foot
lots
that
are
adjacent
to
their
double
lots,
which
is
a
standard
in
jack's
beach.
So
it's
not
a
special
condition.
There
are
other
many
many
lots
like
this
in
jax
beach,
especially
that
neighborhood,
which
is
rs2
zone
4,
housing,
special
circumstances
and
conditions
do
not
result
from
the
actions
of
the
applicant.
During
the
meeting
last
year,
it
was
established
by
the
board
mr
curly,
miss
gonzalez.
You
guys
were
both
present,
and
so
was
mr
and
it
was
a
discussion
by
the.
I
Established
by
you
guys
and
agreed
that
it
was
purchased
by
the
developer
and
they
knew
that
this
condition
existed
so
granting
the
variance
will
not
confer
upon
the
applicant
any
special
privileges
denied
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
I
I
believe
you
will
said
precedence
if
this
is
a
proof
same
with
number
four
same
with
number
five
or
actually
number
five.
The
neighbors
have
asked
the
city
and
the
builder
to
please
consider
allowing
us
to
purchase
this
law
because
lots
16,
15
and
14,
which
is
11,
26,
11,
20
and
11
10,
all
back
onto
the
slot.
The
neighbors
have
asked
to
for
the
builder
to
speak
to
us,
so
we
can
purchase
it.
If
so,
we
can
either
extend
all
those
lots
or
do
something
with
it.
I
We
used
to
have
a
butterfly
garden
and
a
community
garden
on
that
lot.
The
builder
has
come
in
after
the
first
meeting
in
2019
and
has
demolished
all
of
it,
which
understandably
that's
his
lock.
He
can
do
whatever
with
it,
but
that
was
really.
It
was
a
slap
in
the
face
to
the
neighborhood
so
to
go
back
to
number
six
flooding.
I
have
sent
videos
and
pictures
of
my
front
yard.
The
water
comes
up
two
feet.
I
I
So
if
you
guys
have
a
chance,
please
take
a
take
a
look
at
that
video
because
that
was
not
during
hurricane
season.
It
was
just
a
regular
afternoon
storm
and
then
I
will
go
back
because
I
have
more
notes,
but
I
will
just
say
that
this
will
set
precedence.
I
own
a
lot
and
yeah
I'll
stop.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
your.
A
I
don't
believe
that
it's
customary
for
us
to
ask
questions
of
the
public
speakers.
I
think
that's
more
reserved
for
christian
without
saying
to
here.
I
don't
know
if
that's
correct,
but
it.
H
B
J
Please
state
your
name
in
your
address.
My
name
is
vicky
message:
1855
privacy,
okay,
I
bought
you
know
we
bought
our
house
around
the
corner,
2015
and
we
were
looking
to
put
a
pool,
and
I
looked
at
my
survey
and
I
have
to
get
up
out
my
chest
a
little
bit
when
I
saw
that
we
were
on
a
double
lot
and
then
I
realized.
Well
goodness,
all
my
neighbors
have
built
their
houses
on
top
of
lots
and
some
even
have
triple
lots.
So
that's
not
unusual
at
all
to
be
expected.
J
I
in
fact
there
are
no
single
lots.
There
is
no
resonances
built
on
a
single
25-foot
25-foot
wide
block
in
the
neighborhood.
J
J
Many
times
people
came
up
before
you
took
the
grant
variances
and
they
weren't
permitted
and
oc
finally
sold
a
lot
to
mr
atkins
last
year
for
25
000,
and
I
would
say
that
a
build
of
a
lot
in
norway
would
be
worth
conservatively
250k,
so
he
paid
about
10,
and
it's
just
you
know,
taking
a
shot
to
see
if
he
can
get
this
approved,
that's
speculative
and
to
oldest
point.
He
has
not
entertained
or
given
us
the
option
to
purchase
that
lot,
and
I
would
like
to
say
he's
welcome
to
contact
me.
J
J
J
Please
do
not
give
him
a
variance.
Let's
let
the
building
codes
do
their
job.
If
we
were
not
meant
to
have
a
house
on
a
20
foot,
five
25
foot
five
block
and
I
would
like
to
you
evolve
to
stanford
and
let
those
building
codes
protect
us
and
if
you
build
a
10
foot
wide
house
soviet.
B
C
C
I
think
the
main
concern
is
in
the
neighborhood
is
going
to
be
just
setting
precedent
because
the
future
wants
to
stop
builders
from
demolishing
an
old
home
they're.
Putting
up
you
know,
two
15
foot
light
holes,
there's
nothing
like
this
in
our
development
of
coastal
heights
and
we
want
to
keep
it
that
way.
You
feel
like
it's
going
to
reduce
the
property
values
and
not
have
a
you
know,
a
good.
E
So
we
have
14
emails
in
our
packages
that
all
oppose
this,
and
now
we
have
a
package
of
new
emails.
C
E
So
the
one
is
from
april
mitzelle,
1126
owen
avenue
jacksonville
beach.
E
E
E
The
next
one
is
from
jennifer
o'neal
no
address
in
opposition
of
the
variance
request.
The
next
one
is
from
harrison
o'neal
no
address
in
opposition
to
the
variance
request.
The
next
one
is
from
jack
delace,
also
in
opposition
to
address
the
next
one
is
some
sarah
o'neill
in
opposition
no
address
bob
bonner,
bona
berger.
E
Who
identify
themselves
as
property
owners
in
jack's
speech,
but
don't
provide
an
address.
They
strongly
oppose
the
variance
request.
The
next
one
is
from
mac.
Orton
no
address
opposes
the
variance
request.
The
next
one
is
from
claire
elliot
new
address
in
opposition
to
the
variance
request.
The
next
one
is
susan
o'neill
no
address
in
opposition.
The
next
one
is
from
jay
santiske
no
address
in
opposition.
E
E
One
one
two,
five
theodore
avenue
in
opposition
to
the
variance
request.
E
E
Next
one
is
from
david
and
dora
bradson
1950
bullion,
and
they
are
an
opposition.
The
next
one
is
from
a
speaker
that
we
heard
over
goldman
still
in
opposition
and.
E
E
No
adress
is
it.
I
know
what
avenue
in
opposition
the
next
one
is
from
mary,
nicole
beth
and
barry
nicole.
Excuse
me
beth
and
barry
nicole,
and
they
don't
have
an
address
and
they're
in
opposition.
The
next
one
is
for
it's
from
ivan
and
ann
richter,
2030
orange
street
and
their
opposition.
E
Leslie
mcmahon,
110
owen
avenue
and
she
is
in
opposition.
E
And
then
the
last
one
is
from
katie
kimball,
I
guess
2251
riley
street
and
she
is
in
opposition.
F
Like
to
address
some
of
the
concerns
that
we
heard
during
the
the
oral
testimony,
and
also
the
emails
that
were
part
of
the
packet.
F
F
So
they
are
concerned
about
flooding
we're
at
35,
lock
coverage.
We're
not
asking
for
any
additional
lock
covers
whether
this
is
one
lock
or
50
lines.
F
We
heard
that
miss
may
set
a
precedence.
This
is
the
only
orphaned
lot
in
the
neighborhood.
There
are
no
more.
There
are
other
ones
that
are
attached
to
other
properties,
but
it's
very
clear
in
the
code
that
the
applicant
cannot
cause
the
hardship
and,
by
splitting
off
a
lot
from
an
adjacent
two
or
three
lots.
You
were
causing
your
own
hardship.
F
This
was
not
done.
This
was
done
years
and
years
ago,
this
lock
was
orphaned
years
ago,
parking
we're
going
to
provide
two
parking
spaces
in
the
in
the
driveway.
In
addition
to
the
one
in
the
garage.
F
F
Thing
about
the
the
fire
hazard
about
the
closest
that's
being
closed,
the
property
line
being
by
fire
hazard.
What's
ironic,
this
house
will
be
further
away
from
any
other
structure
than
any
other
house
on
that
block
houses
to
the
north
will
be
over
50
feet
away
from
the
house.
The
houses
to
the
south
will
be
at
least
35
feet
away
from
the
house,
so
in
proximity.
F
It's
the
furthest
any
other
real
park,
it's
just
factual.
We
are
asking
this.
We
will
stipulate
to
two
stories.
I
don't
have
any
if
you
put
that
stipulation
on
there.
If
you
approve,
if
you
said
fine,
to
approve
this
variance
two
stories,
I
don't
want
to
build
a
three-story
house.
There's
no
need
to
support
this
neighborhood
somebody
in
one
of
the
few
of
the
emails
there
were
references
to
a
tiny
house.
C
F
Square
feet:
there
are
many
houses
on
that
block
that
are
12
and
1300
square
feet.
This
is
just
not
the
case,
the
privacy
we
talked
about
that
not
putting
any
windows
on
the
north
side
of
the
house
so
that
all
the
neighbors
to
the
north,
with
their
swimming
pools,
will
have
no
one
looking
at
them.
Taking
that
into
consideration.
F
In
addition,
the
main
thing
I
think
here
rightly
so
folks
are
nervous
about
is
property
things
we
all
are.
I
do
this
every
day.
That's
what
I
do.
A
narrow
house
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
a
cheap
house.
This
will
not
be
a
cheap
house.
F
F
While
it
may
be
difficult
to
say
yes
after
you've
heard
all
of
the
all
of
the
neighbors
opposition
to
this,
this
will
not
factually
hurt
the
neighborhood.
You
know,
we've
heard
this
again
and
again,
in
other
places
that
we've
built
and
when
it's
all
done.
Oh,
that's
really!
Nice,
that's
really
nice!
So
please
take
that
into
consideration.
Thank
you
I'll
answer.
Any
other
questions.
A
Regarding
the
so,
according
to
the
staff
report,
the
proposed
law
coverage
is
33
percent.
Well,.
A
A
F
Well,
there's
a
stoop
out
of
the
bathroom
just
a
stupid
step
out,
so
we
purposely
kept
it
under
35
taking
consideration.
You
know
water
runoff,
keeping
all
the
water
on
site
as
much
as
possible,
35
cutters.
If
you
look
at
those
the
three
neighbors
off
to
the
north
through
all
spoken
opposition,
every
one
of
them
has
a
approved
variance
for
42
at
least
42
percent,
some
as
high
as
51
law
coverage.
F
A
Anybody,
okay:
is
there
anybody
in
the
audience
who
has
not
filled
out
a
speaker's
card?
Who
wishes
to
speak
at
this
time
and
if
so,
please
fill
out
a
speaker's
card
before
you
leave.
A
B
C
C
I
have
realized
that
that
that
to
this
property.
L
C
L
C
A
Okay,
mr
adkins,
do
you
would
you
want
to.
C
F
Just
because
it
directly
affects
the
neighbor
on
that
side,
the
windows
that
are
on
that
side
of
the
house
there
are
only
three
windows
and
bathrooms
that
are
high
windows.
All
they
are
is
just
to
let
light
in
so
the
bottom
of
the
wind
is
at
six
feet
high,
so
you
can't
see
out
you
can't
see
in
the
only
one
window
that
this
low
is
in
the
one
bedroom
for
each
rest,
just
because
we
have
to
have
a
risk
for
the
one
bedroom.
So
again,
we
really
took
that
into
consideration
when
we
had
the
house.
A
E
This
is
the
same
application
that
we
entertained
last
year
and,
while
the
applicant,
I
applaud
his
efforts
to
try
and
address
the
concerns
of
the
community
is
the
same
issue
that
we
dealt
with
in
this
board
last
year.
Except
now,
the
applicant
is
offering
use
descriptions,
I'm
going
to
promise
to
make
two
stories.
I'm
going
to
put
these
windows
here.
Those
are
out
of
programming
we
can't
consider
use.
We
can
only
consider
what
the
variance
is
that
is
requested.
D
A
Well,
I
don't
think
that
we
should
be
making
comments
about
what
he
chooses
to
do
with
it.
I
mean
I
do
understand
that
we
can't
make
a
decision
based
on
a
financial
reason,
if
he's
the
one
presenting
the
financial
reason,
but
I
don't
think
it's
really
for
us
to
say
that
you
know
he
could
do
this
for
that
property.
B
A
On
it,
and
because
it
is
non-conforming,
it
requires
some
relief
from
the
code
I
mean
when
we
look
at
the
six
criteria,
the
only
one
to
me,
the
application
does
meet
all
six
criteria,
the
only
one
that
I'm
you
know
maybe
waffling
on
is
criteria.
Six
variants
will
be
generally
consistent
with
the
purposes
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
this
code,
I
think,
he's
met
that
the
second
part
of
this
criteria
is
and
will
not
adversely
affect
adjacent
land.
A
G
I
think
he's
provided
additional
parking.
I
think
his
ability
to
convey
this
john.
He
mitigated
if
he
said
no
to
something
to
somebody
else,
but
I
think
he's
he's
sort
of
tried
to
do
everything
possible.
G
I
don't
know
christian
the
statement
that
there
are
no
other
what
they
referred
to
as
warfarin
watson's
act,
because
the
preston
piece
does
concern
me.
Is
there
any
way
to
verify
that
or
do
you
happen
to
know
anecdotally?
Are
there
a
lot
of
20
developed,
25
foot
wide
lots
in
jacksonville
beach
still.
H
H
A
Okay
and
please
keep
in
mind
before
I
ask
the
clerk
to
do
a
roll
call
vote
that
the
motion
on
the
floor
is
to
deny
the
request.
So
keep
that
in
mind.
So
if
you
vote.
C
E
A
A
Sorry
owen,
can
we
please
keep
the
conversation
to
the
outside
hallway,
as
we
call
the
next
case?
Please.
E
A
C
B
C
So
I'm
actually
in
the
same
neighborhood,
we
are
in
the
process
of
full
houses
on
a
substandard
lot.
So
we
just
asked
what
we'd
like
to
add
to
that
guards,
our
structures
and
our
coverage.
It
feels
the
minimum
lock
coverage
it
was.
The
house
was
built
by
ability
two
years
ago,
over
and
above
the
lock
cover
set
forth
by
the
deck
speech,
so
the
existing
conditions
does
layout
has
been
a
standard
lot.
C
C
C
Something
we
discussed
potentially
doing
at
a
later
date
when
we
met
with
christian
to
kind
of
discuss
what
was
permissible
and
optimistically
suggested
and
asked
what
we
might
want
in
the
future
to
not
ask
for
multiple
marriage
requests.
So
current
state
there
is
no
near-term
use
for
that
space,
but
that
would
be
really
the
only
usable
space
where
we
could
add
seating,
but
you're
not
asking.
E
Did
you
talk
to
the
neighbors
about
this.
A
And
so
you,
you
purchased
the
home
from
a
builder
or
from
the
original
owner
from.
C
Sure
so
originally
the
three
feet
on
the
southern
side
was
requested
because
the
large
10
by
16
slab
was
we
weren't
sure
if
we
could
fit
that
size
without
going
past
how
much
weight
chestnut
means.
We
talked
about
correct,
so
I
we
think
we
could
potentially
work
with
that.
So
I
know
the
recommendation.
C
Amenable
to
that
yeah
so
there'd
be
a
very
small
section
that
would
be
within
the.
D
C
C
A
A
E
I
think
it's
clear
that
he
wants
the
setbacks
and
that
he
really
doesn't
need
the
accessory.
I'm
sorry
he
wants.
The
lock
covers
we're,
not
the
accessories
that.
C
A
Yeah
very
reasonable.
I,
like
that
they,
you
know,
did
the
sort
of
space
papers,
even
though
it
does
come
against
their
lock
coverage.
It's
just
nice
to
see
you
know
really
taking
into
consideration
the
minimum
usage.
E
E
A
A
Item,
okay,
would
the
applicant
please
be
sworn
in
and
give
your
testimony.
B
A
Thank
you
and
before
I
ask
about
the
hardship
at
this
property
and
you've
noticed
that
you
are
not
listed
as
the
applicant
or
agent.
A
Can
you
please
describe
the
nature
of
the
hardship
of
the
property?
Well,.
L
The
nature
of
the
hardship
was
perfectly
described.
The
we've
got
a
corner
set
back,
as
I
guess.
Let's
start
at
the
beginning,
the
building
is
not
square
to
be
sure
boulevard,
and
so
it
causes
hardships
in
several
different
ways.
The
first
is
the
corner
and
the
northeast
side
is
encroaching.
L
The
lot
coverage
is
we're
proposing
to
have
94
instead
of
100
and
in
lieu
of
the
85
that's
required.
L
L
L
So
basically,
what
we're
looking
at
is
a
reduction
in
a
size,
setback
or
a
corner
site
back
in
the
northeast
corner,
from
10
to
seven
and
a
half
or
so
feet
and
then
reduction
in
particle
spaces
and
a
reduction
in
the
amount
of
the
burdens.
Here.
L
Is
going
on,
as
you
can
see,
the
parking
we
switch
to
the
front
and
then
we're
going
to
still
utilize,
as
you
can
see
as
possible,
those
on
the
east
side
of
the
building,
and
basically
all
that
we're
doing
is
enclosing
the
existing
drive
through
for
storage
and
we're
resurfacing
the
parking
lot
and
beautifying
the
building.
So
it's
going
to
be
a
much
more
attractive
store
and
the
I
guess
the
aesthetic
value
is
is
worth
its
weight
in
gold.
For
this
store
and
the
I
guess
the
circulation
will
be
a
little
bit
louder.
L
G
There's
a
large
new
brewery
behind
you
and
they
were
starting
to
occupy
a
lot
of
those
parking
spots.
This
is
three
o'clock,
so
so
those
are
the
those
are
the
parking
spots
on.
What
is
that?
The
east
side
right
on
the
east
side
and
to
your
point,
john?
That's,
a
pretty
narrow,
drive
plane
there.
It
is.
A
Well,
he's
looking
for
that
christian
those
thoughts
that
they're
referring
to
are
those
not
the
spots
that
are
referenced
in
the
staff
report
that
are
not
technically
part
of
this
property's
private
parking,
because
they're
partially
in
the
city
right-of-way.
So
this
does
not
count
for
their
parking
at
all.
That
is
correct.
H
Right,
yeah
we're
not.
We
can't
count
these
for
two
reasons:
one
they
are
partially
in
the
right
way
and
two
they
don't
meet
the
standards
for
commercial
parking
where
you
can't
back
into
the
right
way,
so
neither
under
both
circumstances
they
wouldn't
qualify
as
on-site
parking.
H
The
parking
spaces
to
the
north
are
technically
in
the
d.o.t
right
away,
but
they've
been
granted
a
permit
historically.
For
that,
it's
worth
noting.
I
don't
know
if
we
covered
this,
but
they
are
reversing
the
parking
up
here
and
making
this
in
one
way,
which
would
help,
I
think,
with
some
of
the
traffic
circulation.
A
L
L
L
H
A
Can
you
speak
at
all
to
the
current
use
of
parking
spaces?
Typically,
when
we
hear
requests
for
variances
and
relief
from
parking
and
obviously
there's
extenuating
circumstances
here,
because
this
property
was
developed
long
before
the
lane
development
code
mandated
a
certain
amount
of
parking
spaces?
But
is
there
any
information
you
can
give
us
about
the
parking
situation
at
this
store
that
might
help
us
understand
why
granting
a
variance
this
extreme
would
be
acceptable.
L
Yes,
there
actually
is
having
done
close
to
100
abc5
atmospheres.
We've
run
into
this
a
lot
where
the
normal
building
requirement
varies
between
three
and
five
parking
spaces
per
thousand
square
feet.
Abc,
of
course,
has
a
unique
business
where
it's
limited
by
the
hours
of
operation.
It's
limited
by
the
age,
it's
limited
by
several
different
factors
with
that
limitation.
L
G
L
In
there
there's
not
room
to
have
the
right
maneuverability,
you
could
talk
about
parallel
spots.
L
You
need
a
10
foot
spot
and
it's
going
to
affect
your
circulation.
Could
we
do
it
not
to
something
that
would
benefit
the
building,
nor
something
that
I
would
feel
comfortable
in
doing
unless
I've
really
looked
into
it
real
close
tonight,
we
looked
at
it
long
enough.
Just
say
that,
let's,
let's
not
do
it,
because
if
I
explained
earlier,
the
limited
apartment
is
usually
required
at
one
of
these
stores
and
and
what
was
provided.
A
L
Eliminating
a
couple
of
spots-
and
the
reason
is
because
we're
going
to
angle
the
parking
instead
of
90
degree
parking
and
we
are
coming
down
two
spots,
two
spaces.
A
What
was
the
oh.
L
A
G
L
If
we
were
to
do
that,
we
the
three-foot
strip,
we
wouldn't
meet
ada.
As
far
as
the
width
of
the
sidewalk
goes,
that's
a
front
that
above
the
building
and
no.
G
A
A
A
H
It's
probably
a
revocable
permit,
but
they
were
at
some
point
about
parking
there.
A
number
of
these
properties
long
beach
boulevard
have
similar
approvals,
including
the
shopping
center,
where
the
world
beer
is
going
to
go,
they
have
the
number
of
parking
spaces
and
driveways
that
are
actually
in
the
right
way.
So
it's
pretty
common.
A
H
Applicant
originally,
who
was
before
abc,
did
the
work,
but
it
is
technically
much
like
the
driveways
that
we
do
for
residential
room
right
away.
They
get
a
revolving
permit.
It's
the
same
thing
here:
it's
eot's
right-of-way,
so
you're
limited
to
what
they
approve
you
to
do,
and
this
is
probably
a
legacy
that
goes
back
30
years
or
more.
A
A
A
A
Okay
hearing
none
did
you
have
an
additional
comment
yesterday
before
I
close
this
okay.
Thank.
L
L
A
A
E
H
Still
is
that
great,
if
the
parking
is
designed
properly,
we
typically
count
it
because
ut's
allowed
us
to
be
there.
The
issue
with
this
particular
project
is
that
dfg
can
come
in
and
say:
hey
we
got
to
use
this
right,
in
which
case
then
they
would
potentially
have
parking
deficit,
but
typically,
if
they
have
to
do
utility
worker,
we
have
to
do
utility
work.
They
restore
it
afterwards.
A
Or
there's
not
a
direct
usage-
that's
outlined
in
the
code
that
sometimes
we
you
know
planning
has
to
choose
the
next
closest
one,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
this
is
the
one
with
I
guess,
the
lowest
burden,
because
you
know
I'm
inclined
to
approve
based
on
the
the
person
who
spoke
on
behalf
of
the
applicant,
and
you
know,
I've
never
seen
more
than
two
or
three
cars
parked
there
at
a
time,
but
for
a
regular
retail
space
that
has
a
different
clientele
or
business
model.
The
standard.
H
This
would
follow.
We
generally
classify
commercial
uses
as
commercial
not
uses
not
specifically
listed,
so
it's
not
something
unique
like
a
doctor's
office
or
a
restaurant,
and
that
standard
is
one
of
200,
so
that
would
apply
to
virtually
any
retail
store
or
grocery
store,
or
anything
like
that
in
the
city.
So
I
mean
you
would
treat
it
the
same
as
anything
else.
A
C
A
I
you
know
they
don't
even
use
all
the
spaces
they
have
now
so
reducing
it
by
two.
I
think
they
still.
At
least
you
know
just
anecdotally.
From
my
observations.
I
don't
think
that
they'll
all
be
used
and
then
from
there
I
mean
I
know
it's
been
mentioned,
the
the
new
brewery
that
opened
up
back
there.
I
know
that
they,
they
do
generate
a
lot
of
parking
traffic,
but
if
we're
limiting
this
just
to
the
actual
spaces
that
are
for
this
business,
not
anything
that's
in
the
right-of-way,
and
you
know.
C
B
John
moorland,
yes
carly,
yes,
todd
smith,
yeah,
alexi
gonzalez,
yes,.
A
E
A
D
E
Property
address
983,
2nd
street
south,
mostly
considered
34-340
e
c
e3
c1
for
a
front
side.
Guard
setback
of
7
feet
below
20
feet
required
34-340,
e3,
c3
for
a
rear
yard,
setback
of
16
feet
and
a
little
30
feet
minimum
to
allow
for
construction
of
two
new
multi-family
developments
and
to
address
existing
non-universities.
A
Thank
you
as
a
reminder,
each
member
of
the
public
will
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak
when
we
open
the
public
hearing.
Does
any
board
member
have
any
expertise?
Communication
on
this
item.
B
M
M
Okay,
well,
I
purchased
the
property
27
years
ago
and
at
that
point
it
was
an
abandoned,
derelict
structure.
Zone
multi-family,
its
original
use
had
been
a
store
in
two
rental
units
over
the
years,
I've
improved
it
to
three
rental
units,
and
I
is
the
owner
occupied
the
second
floor
unit
and
there
are
two
smaller
rental
units
on
the
ground
floor.
M
In
doing
this,
I
will
create
six
designated
parking
spaces
and
I
will
include
a
two
unit,
three
story
separate
structure
in
the
three
in
the
rear
yard.
So
the
two
units
that
were
on
that
are
now
on
the
ground
floor
will
be
in
a
separate
structure
in
the
backyard.
M
All
of
this
will
enhance
the
neighborhood
and
it
will
have
an
appealing
exterior
the
two
hardships
that
I
face
is
I
need
to.
In
order
to
do
this,
I
need
to
build
into
the
rear
setback,
and
I
also
need
to
add
a
third
level
to
the
existing
structures
footprint.
M
All
right
so
hardship,
one.
My
request
is
for
that
rear
setback
in
july
on
july
20th,
my
builder
and
I
I've
been
trying
to
do
this
since
2010..
I've
come
a
couple
of
times.
I
came
last
year
and
I
because
I
need
to
improve
my
property.
It
was
built
in
1950
and
it
needs
major
work
and
none
of
the
units
really
comply
with
today's
city
code.
I
mean
it
was
built
in
the
50s.
I've
done
the
best.
I
could,
and
I
really
want
to
step
up
and
make
everything
legit
so.
M
And
I
john
hannah
met
with
the
building
superintendent
and
the
city
planner
on
july
20th.
Regarding
the
plans
we
had
in
place
to
build,
build
our
plan
and
at
that
point
the
plan
was
to
build
the
two
units
attached
to
the
existing
structure.
So
I
would
have
my
one
unit,
so
I
can
have
room
to
live
in
garages
below
and
we
were
going
to
attach
the
two
units
to
that
existing
structure.
M
So,
given
the
hardship
flood
plan,
the
city
advised
me
that
I
should
go
down,
because
I
did
have
a
true
hardship
and
asked
for
a
variance
of
16
feet
on
that.
Back
setback
in
lieu
of
the
30
feet:
that's
required
in
order
to
allow
for
the
separation
between
the
current
structure
and
the
two
new
unit
structures
that
I
plan
to
build.
So
that's
one
hardship
I
mean
now.
The
second
hardship
has
to
do
with
my
primary
structure
and
turning
it
into
one
unit
and
having
it
for
my
family
who
consists
of
four
adults.
M
M
M
The
minimum
is
1100
square
feet,
so
I
can
easily
achieve
that
on
the
two
new
units,
but
on
this
primary
unit
my
plan-
and
the
only
thing
I
really
can
do
for
parking-
is
to
have
the
garage
on
that
ground
floor.
You
know,
I
don't
have
room
in
the
front
because
I'm
almost
I'm
like
eight
feet
off,
that's
the
line,
so
I
don't
have
room
to
put
any
parking
on
the
south
side,
I'm
on
the
line,
basically
on
the
west
side,
so
on
the
sides
there's
no
room
for
parking
either.
M
So
in
doing
that
I
will
lose
living
space,
so
I
calculated
how
much
living
space
I
would
actually
have
if
I
were
given
the
variance
that
I'm
requesting
and
that
is
to
build
a
third
floor
on
the
primary
footprint
not
have
to
do
setbacks
just
on
the
third
floor.
So
if
I
could,
if
I
get
approved
and
I'm
able
to
build
on
the
footprint
of
my
third
floor,
then
I
would
be
able
to
come
up
with
a
square
footage
of
1878
square
feet.
M
M
Square
feet
that
would
be
enough
room
for
me
to
build
my
three
bedroom
unit
that
won
the
primary
structure.
However,
if
I'm
not
approved,
then
that
third
floor
setback
would
take
away
711
square
feet
on
the
unit
one
and
therefore
leave
me
with
945
square
feet
total,
which
would
not
only
allow
me
to
build
a
one
bedroom
structure
as
far
as
the
city
is
concerned,
so
that's
my
hardships
there.
I
would
like
to
have
room
for
my
family
in
a
three
bedroom.
I
think
that's
a
reasonable
request
in
that
in
the
primary
unit.
M
Oh-
and
one
thing
I
didn't
mention
is
right:
now
the
primary
structure
is
like
an
l
shape.
So
in
order
to
allow
for
the
separation,
you
know
of
the
primary
structure
and
the
two
new
units,
I'm
due
to
the
blood
zone,
I'm
going
to
have
to
take
away
part
of
the
existing
structure-
that's
like
the
l,
so
it
would
like
square
it
up.
So
I
would
have
enough
room
for
the
separation
of
the
primary
structure,
so
I
would
lose
square
footage
there
as
well
and
that's
that's
counted
in
the
the
1878.
M
M
There
will
be
a
one
car
garage
if
you
can
see
the
driveway,
that's
a
one
car
garage
and
then
I
was
informed
by
the
city
that,
because
I
was
just
going
to
have
the
other
parking
space
outside
of
the
garage.
But
then
I
was
told
that
it
needs
to
be
17
feet.
So,
according
to
the
drawing
I'm
able
to
put
one
space,
one
parking
space
on
each
side
of
that
new
addition
yeah
there
and
there-
and
I
can
get
my
17
feet
that
way
and
I'm
also
10
feet
from
the
hour.
M
That
worked
for
parking.
I
also
put
like
some
little
drawings
on
the
back
of
each
because
I've
been
doing
the
impervious
percent
calculation.
M
I
took
into
account
the
the
pads
for
the
air
conditioning
units,
which
you
know
so
in
that
on
that
piece
of
paper
I
have
my
I'm
at
62.9,
so
I'm
under
the
impervious
percent
requirement.
So
I
didn't
have
to
ask
for
that,
but
I
really
tried
to
make
everything
work
on
this
plan.
A
So
in
the
staff
report,
it's
noted
that
what's
proposed
in
the
packet
that
we
received,
that
your
project
upon
completion,
if
completed
as
proposed,
would
be
57
so
you're
getting
a
62.9
percent
by
adding.
That
is
this
extra.
M
C
A
I
believe
in
reviewing
the
packet
that
it
looks
like
in
2003,
you
requested
relief
from
the
rear
yard
setback
for
two
additional
dwelling
units
and
that
that
request
was
denied.
Yes,
do
you,
I
know
it's
been
like
almost
20
years.
Do
you
recall
at
the
time
what
the
sort
of
rationale
was.
M
Well,
I
didn't
know
about:
there
was
no
flood
zone
back
there
then,
but
I
had
my
neighbor
to
the
east
come
up
and
he
was
he
said
that
his
wife
couldn't
sunbathe
in
the
backyard.
If
I
built
it,
if
I
use
some
of
that
setback
to
build
something
I
mean
since
then,
we've
have
a
apartment,
complex
and
back.
That
is
35
feet
high.
D
M
M
I
did
I
did,
and
I
had
talked
to
them
last
year
too,
and
I
I
have
the
neighbors
that
are
directly
around
me,
the
neighbors
to
the
neighbor
to
my
east
he's
here
to
talk
tonight
and
the
neighbors
that
are
immediately
to
the
south.
M
They
also
sign
letters
in
approval,
but
I
do
have
some
neighbors
that
don't
really
live.
You
know
close
to
me.
In
fact,
they
can't
really
see
my
property
unless
they
go
out
in
the
street
and
look
down
the
road,
but
they
oppose
me-
and
I
don't
know
why
I
mean
I-
I
have
rentals
and
right
now
those
rentals
are
being
used
as
airbnbs.
M
When
I
was
at
the
last
meeting,
they
came
up
and
they
said
you
know
we
shouldn't
let
her
do
anything
because
she's
using
those
wrinkles
as
airbnb's,
we
shouldn't
let
her
we
should
not
and
that
they
use
the
whole.
But
this
is
a
multi-family
zoning.
This
is
a
the
jacksonville
beach,
it's
a
very
public
area
and
I
have
a
right
to
rent
properties
out
I've
rented
the
properties
out
ever
since
I've
owned
it.
A
A
A
Of
the
builder,
because
we
need
to
have
them
sworn
in
to
address
anything
if,
if
something
comes
up
after
she,
if
she
wishes
to
address
any
of
the
public
comments
made,
we
may
choose
to
put
it
over
that
time.
So,
thank
you.
Do
we
have
any
speakers
for
us.
B
B
B
C
Name
is
gregory
phipps,
127th,
10th
avenue
south.
I
am
her
neighbor
that
she
just
referenced
directly
east
of
her,
so
just
want
to.
M
C
A
few
comments:
yes,
I'm
in
support
of
what
she
is
proposing
here,
but
just
a
couple
of
commentaries.
She
is
a
very
good
neighbor.
She
is
an
on-site
manager,
so
we've
owned
that
property.
For
about
three
years
now
and
she's
had
some
she's
had
rental
properties
on
the
ground
floor,
she's
always
on
site
and
managing
them.
She
does
it
as
a
good
job.
C
She
has.
You
mentioned
her
kids,
they
are
on
site
and
she
has
grandkids
that
come
and
visit
regularly
as
well.
So
it's
a
very
there's
a
lot
of
family
members
that
are
around
their
regular
regularly.
C
Her
property
very
well
too
so
grass
is
cut
in
the
backyard
they
have
a
number
of
flowers
and
plants
and
trees
and
some
garden
that
they're
always
maintaining,
and
then
I
know
she
wants
to
add
the
two
buildings
to
her
and
then
she
wants
to
change
that
existing
property,
which
I
I
think
is
good.
C
It
would
remove
some
of
the
short-term
wrinkles
at
the
bottom
and
then
move
them
over
to
the
back
side
into
the
two
buildings
that
she's
proposing,
and
then
I
I
also
like
that
on
the
ground
forward
should
be
changed.
Some
of
the
parking
there
to
at
the
garage.
So
all
in
all,
I
am
in
favor
of
this
and
there's
just
comments.
B
K
And
the
property
is
123
10th
avenue
south,
so
we
are
well
right
next
to
grant
on
the
other
side,
for
the
reason
that
property's
been
in
our
family
since
about
1899.
K
and
yeah
we're
here,
posing
it
this.
This
exact
request
came
before
the
board
last
year:
you'll
call
it
attack.
K
K
Both
sides-
the
this,
has
been
denied
twice
now
once
in
2003,
when
she
asked
for
a
20-foot
setback
once
in
2021,
when
she
asked
for
a
24-foot
setback
in
the
rear
she's,
not
asking
for
a
16-foot
setback
to
the
extent
that
she
was
granted
any
kind
of
variances
in
2019.
Those
were
to
pure
non-deformities
and
to
allow
the
property
to
make
the
structure
on
the
property
in
the
event
of
a
hurricane
does
not
granting
of
conformities
as
a
as
a
general
very
experienced
higher
lot.
C
K
C
K
Feet:
she's
asking
build
a
third
story,
building
or
a
third
story
out
to
seven
feet,
and
that's
not.
That
was
not
the
purpose
of
the
granny
or
the
original
variance.
She
should
be
throwing
third
floor
to
the
proper
setbacks
and
that's
the
point
of
all
this.
She
doesn't
need
a
marriage.
She
can
build
to
code,
there's
plenty
of
room
to
the
extent
that
there
is
any
peculiar
nature
of
the
property.
K
It's
the
fact
that
her
her
existing
structure
is
so
is
pushed
so
far
to
the
south.
It
gives
her
a
lot
more
room
than
other
people
would
normally
have
on
this
property.
She
can
build
that
there
you
can
see
how
much
room
she
has.
She
can
build
within
code
to
the
extent
that
so
I
disagree
that
there's
a
special
condition.
She
actually,
the
special
commission
helps
her
to
build
the
code.
It
allows
her
for
proper
setbacks
in
terms
of
it
being
something
that
she
created.
K
This
is
the
design
that
she
wanted.
She
can
change
her
design.
She
should
be
building
or
designing
her
project
to
fit
the
land,
not
conforming
the
land,
to
fit
her
design.
As
she
stated,
she
is
a
she's,
a
super
host
of
airbnb.
You
will
hear
other
people
come
up.
That
will
talk
about
the
fact
that
the
parking
situation
is
bad
she's,
removing
two
parking
spaces
on
second
street.
We
haven't
had
overflow
problems.
K
E
E
D
D
Basically,
I'm
worried
about
the
parking
situation
where
we're
going
through
a
a
renovation
for
the
streets
now
and
I'm
afraid
that
if
we
add
more
parking,
it's
it's
going
to
exacerbate
the
problem
we
already
had.
The
second
thing
I'm
somewhat
worried
about
is
the
number
of
units.
I
would
like
to
see
a
plan
for
the
existing
three
units
being
changed
for
one
unit.
D
Assuming
that
the
zoning
current
zoning
only
allows
three
units
per
lot,
is
that
correct
j?
Is
it
j
m
or
two.
H
D
All
right:
well,
that's
that's
one
of
my
concerns
other
than
that
have
beauty.
E
Vickie
swindle
does
not
wish
to
address
the
board,
but
as
opposed
to
the
agenda,
eric
feldman
does
not
wish
to
address
the
board,
but
as
opposed
to
the
agenda,
we
have
a
package
of
correspondence
of
emails,
four
opposed
and
three
in
paper.
E
E
Sorry
that
was
signed
by
david,
I'm
sorry
who's
in
approval
of
the
request,
138
10th
avenue
south
the
next
one,
lisa
and
greg
felt
this.
We
are
from
great
foots
and
he
is
in
favor
and
the
next
one
is
from
robert
riggins.
M
Just
quickly,
I
guess
david
ruffle,
that's
part
of
that
family.
That's
against
me!
It's
two
houses
east.
They
can't
see
the
house
at
all
unless
they
come
out
into
the
street,
but
he
said
that
I
was
asking
for
the
very
same
thing
as
I
did
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
and
that's
not
true,
because
we
did
go
to
the
planning
committee
in
july
and
that's
when
the
flood
zone
was
pointed
out,
so
we
were
trying
to
build
given
what
the
last
bearings
board
didn't
approve.
M
We
were
trying
to
attach
it
to
the
structure
and
not
use
that
very
setback.
So
we
really
did
try
to
do
that,
but
our
hardship
really
lies
in
the
fact
that
we
found
out
about
that
new
flood
zone
designation
that
is
in
the
rear
yard.
So
we
absolutely
cannot
will
attached.
So
this
is
a
completely
different
hardship
that
was
not
brought
up
at
the
last
meeting.
M
M
Park,
there's
the
right-of-way
on
10th
avenue
south
that
just
lies
along
everyone's
property.
That's
on
10th
avenue
south
and
you
guys
are
going
to
be
doing
some
work
on
that
and
creating
new
public
parking.
We
have
a
plan
for
that
already,
but
right
now,
that's
where
we
park
we
park
in
that,
instead
of
a
lot
of
my
neighbors.
G
M
D
G
M
G
H
Dude
jeremy,
just
there's
another
piece
of
this:
that's
worth
considering
any
renovation
of
an
existing
structure
that
trips,
the
50
requirement
for
value
instructure,
would
require
them
to
bring
all
the
non-conformities
into
compliance,
which
means
whether
they
had
a
second
floor
or
a
third
floor.
They'd,
probably
end
up
right
back
here,
looking
for
relief
for
that
front
setback,
so
otherwise
they
couldn't
renovate
even
the
interior
structure.
H
I
imagine
that,
even
if
they
put
a
900
square
foot
third
story,
they're
going
to
be
back
asking
for
that
fun
setback
regardless
and
to
answer
your
question,
a
one
bedroom
unit
has
to
have
700
square
feet.
A
two
bedroom
unit
has
to
have
900
square
feet,
and
a
three
bedroom
unit
has
to
have
1100
square
feet
at
a.
D
As
opposed
to
making
something
work
that
works
more
basically
well,
I
think
it
worked
when
we
attached
it,
but
due
to
the
fact
that
they
changed
the
flood
zone,
it
runs
through
that
and
we
would
have
to
bring
all
those
units
either.
We
would
lose
the
first
floor
on
the
two
units
that
we
built
because
they
wouldn't
conform
with
the
flood
zone,
so
they
could
not
be
inhabited.
We
could
put
parking
there,
but
we
could
not
put
any
kind
of
living
space,
so
we
would
be
restricted
on
that
site.
M
G
M
Was
advised
that
we
didn't
want
to
do
that
with
the
alley,
because
we've
got
that
multi
structure,
the
apartments
right
behind
me
they're
over
their
setbacks
there
and
for
safety
purposes
in
regards
to
fire
engines,
and
all
of
that
I
was
told
that
the
city
really
didn't
like
to
if
I
could
put
the
garages
and
the
driveways
coming
off
the
second.
That
would
be
better
than
the
alley.
So
that's
why
I
didn't
go
with
the
alley.
A
H
H
As
you
can
see,
there's
a
lot
of
variances
with
this
and
we
sat
down
and
went
through
all
of
them
and
that
front
setback
had
been
requested
previously
but
had
never
been
approved,
and
the
only
thing
that
had
been
improved
was
the
encouragement
for
the
deck,
but
not
the
building.
So
the
side
setbacks
have
been
addressed
for
that
structure
in
various
forms
in
the
past,
but
that
front
setback
is
still
a
non-deformity.
A
M
Same
footprint
when
you
were
just
when
I
purchased
the
home,
the
deck
wasn't
there,
but
we
wanted
the
deck
so
that
we
could
access
the
building,
because
the
only
thing
that
was
there
to
access
the
buildings
on
the
east
side
was
pretty
much
a
ladder.
A
A
B
K
Kirk
clemens
one
zero,
zero,
two
second
street
south
dakota
speech.
I've
already
submitted
a
letter
to
you,
but
I
just
want
to
review
with
you
real
quick.
I
know
you
didn't
have
time
to
read.
K
K
K
K
K
Does
anyone
want
to
live
around
a
large
group
of
constantly
changing
unknown
vacationers?
All
the
time
dealing
with
the
constant
churning
of
hotel
guests
coming
in
and
out,
light
enjoyment
should
be
the
right
of
every
property
owner,
while
the
decision
on
the
specific
requests
and
variances
rests
with
the
board,
I
would
respectfully
urge
you
to
consider
how
the
approval
of
these
variances
will
negatively
in
fact
impact
our
neighborhood
today
as
possible
as
a
future.
H
Yeah,
actually,
just
you
know,
talk
to
the
code
enforcement
about
this
today,
so
yeah.
The
florida
legislature
basically
said
that
we
can't
bend
short
term
vacation
rentals
or
regulate
them
by
length
of
stay
or
number
of
days
of
stay,
and
you
have
to
treat
them
like
any
other
residential
unit
where
they're
allowed.
So
if
it's
a
house,
it
can
be
rented
as
an
airbnb.
If
it's
a
multi-family
unit,
it
can
be
an
airbnb.
The
only
thing
that
we
require
is
a
registration
and
they
pay
their
requisite
taxes
to
the
county
and
state.
A
Mr
sturms,
would
you
like
to
address
the
last
comment
that
was
made?
If
you
just
make
sure
you
come
up
to
them.
M
The
only
thing
I
want
to
reiterate
is
that
my
property
is
multi-family
zoning.
It's
not
single
family,
home
residential.
That
is
a
very
public
area
there
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
A
lot
of
those
homes
on
the
west
side
of
second
are
designated
commercial
even
and
this
house
has
been
there
since
1950,
it's
been
a
store
in
two
units
and
now
it's
three
units,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
enhance
and
improve
my
property.
It'll
be
it'll,
be
a
beautiful
project.
When
I
get
done
and
it's
gonna
be,
you
know
something.
A
A
With
the
two
parking,
the
two
public
parking
spaces,
the
reason
that
those
spaces
would
be
eliminated
with
this
proposed
site
plan
is
because
they
would
need
ingress
and
egress
into
the
parking
spaces
from
the
street,
essentially
driving
through
what
is
now
this
public
spaces
right
yeah.
So
they.
H
H
You'll
see
this
pretty
commonly
anywhere,
there's
not
a
driveway.
They
basically
strike
the
parking
space
and
when
there's
a
driveway
there
isn't
a
space.
Public
works
is
redoing
a
number
of
these
side
streets
in
this
area
for
a
big
drainage
project,
and
that's
one
of
the
things
that
they've
done
is
kind
of
sat
down
with
every
property
owner
street
by
street.
To
say
you
know
these
are
the
existing
parking
spaces.
These
from
your
driveways
are
and
yeah.
H
H
We
allow
secondary
access
off
of
driveways.
You
can
have
primary
access
up,
I'm
starting
off
with
values.
You
can
have
primary
access.
If
you
have
secondary
access
to
the
front
street,
there's
no
requirement
one
way
or
the
other.
I
don't
know
if
it
would
work.
G
H
Just
for
clarification,
I
did
look
up
the
2019
variants
and
it
was
approved
for
again
two
attached
units
that
were
very,
very
similar,
wasn't
proposed
here,
but
were
attached
to
the
primary
structure.
So
they
could,
in
theory,
do
that
if
they
can
address
the
flood
zone
issues,
it
wouldn't
be
substantially
different.
So
you
have
that
as
an
approved
right
right
now,.
D
H
Good
question:
so
it's
not
terribly
easy
to
see
on
here,
but
this
line
right
here
basically
denotes
the
ae
flood
zone.
Everything
forward
of
this
is
the
x-shaded
flood
zone.
The
ae
flood
zone
has
requirements
for
elevating
the
structure
above
the
base.
Flood
elevation
level,
which
I
think
is
nine
feet
here,
so
it
would
have
to
be
a
foot
above
that
which
would
be
10
feet
if
you
renovate
an
existing
structure
beyond
a
certain
percentage.
H
You
also
have
to
mitigate
that
impact,
and
so
in
essence,
you
would
have
to
elevate
the
primary
structure.
If
you
trip
certain
requirements,
the
current
primary
structure
is
not
influenza.
The
new
structure
will
be,
if
you
attach
them
that
new
requirement
would
then
apply
to
the
primary
structure.
It
would
have
to
be
addressed
in
essence:
either
elevating
it
or
flood
vents
or
redesigning
it
engineering
it
differently
or
unrealistically,
elevating
the
whole
structure
by
detaching
it.
H
G
H
Through
the
consultant,
which
will
be
we'll,
have
all
the
dates
and
information
and
as
we
as
the
consultant
does
presentations
they'll
be
posted
there
as
well.
So
once
we
get
that
launched,
we'll
have
the
dates,
finalized
and
I'll.
Let
you
guys
know
on
that
here,
we'll
be
it
will
most
likely
be
here,
but,
depending
on
how
some
of
the
earlier
meetings
go
for
public
turnout,
we
may
end
up
at
the
parks
department
building
over
in
sunshine
park,
but
yeah.