►
From YouTube: City Council Briefing (08/09/2021)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
Thank
you
mike
and
good
evening,
council.
First,
I
want
to
apologize
for
trevor
hughes.
He's
heading
up
this
project
he's
disappointed
not
to
be
here
tonight.
He
had
a
parents
and
teachers
association
meeting.
B
So
at
the
beginning
of
the
year,
council
gave
us
direction
to
seek
a
consultant
to
do
what
I
think
we
termed
a
reimagine
of
gonzales
park
we
reached
out
to
mr
brett
goddard
who's
with
us
tonight
online.
If
council
has
any
questions
for
brett,
he
has
a
history
with
with
the
city,
most
notably
oceanfront
park,
and
the
design
of
latham
plaza
and
seawalk
pavilion
among
others.
B
B
Along
with
that,
I
believe
you
also
listened
to
the
council's
meeting
when
we
received
the
feedback
from
from
you
guys
and
with
that
he
has
developed
three
conceptual
plans
for
us
that
we
asking
council
tonight
to
look
at
to
see
if
we
can
get
consensus
to
move
along.
The
ultimate
goal
is
to
get
mr
goddard
enough
information
that
he
can
develop
a
final
design
that
we
could
take
out
for
bid
and
and
develop
some
budget
numbers.
B
So
the
question
that
we
have
for
council
tonight
is:
does
council
prefer
one
of
the
three
concepts
and
if
so,
can
we
talk
about
the
amenities
in
those
concepts?
Agree
on
those
to
see
where
we
go
further?
So
that's
our
question
for
council
tonight
and
I'll
open
it
up.
A
C
I
jason
I
just
I
would
like
to
say
I
feel
like
we
me
personally
or
we're
not
ready
to
move
forward
with
any
concept
plans,
because
I've
gotten
some
feedback
from
citizens
who
are
concerned,
because
the
concept
plans,
don't
include
a
basketball
court
and
they
don't
include
a
ball
field
and
some
of
the
people
who
took
the
survey
said
that
they
were
under
the
impression
that
the
question
was
asking
for
what
are
some
additions,
you'd
like
to
see
to
gonzales
park,
and
they
had
no
idea
that
some
of
the
things
would
be
going
away,
and
so
my
concern
is:
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
taking
anything
away
from
gonzales
park.
C
I
am
feeling
like.
Perhaps
we
have
an
opportunity
here
for
some
additional
community
input
and
I
don't
know
if
that
needs
to
be
done
in
a
workshop
sort
of
way
or
whatever,
but
I
would
not
feel
comfortable
moving
forward
with
any
plans
without
making
sure
that
we
get
some
community
input
and
making
sure
that
we
we
aren't
taking
anything
out
that
we
shouldn't
be
taking
out.
The
only
other
comment
that
I
would
make
too
is
with
that
one
concept
plan
that
has
the
dog
park
area
in
it.
C
You
know
I'm
a
dog
person,
but
my
concern
with
putting
a
dog
park
in
that
area.
Is
that
there's
not
a
big
enough
space
to
do
a
dog
park
dog?
You
know.
Dog
parks
really
need
to
be
a
larger
space
where
dogs
can
run,
and
so
I
I
personally
would
not
recommend
that
that
be
anything
that
would
be
included
in
gonzales.
I
think
gonzales
is
not
big
enough
to
incorporate
something
like
that,
and
we
have
a
lot
of
other
things
that
we
could
focus
on.
B
Yes,
miss
golding
that
absolutely
we
we
don't
think
that
we
would
arrive
at
a
final
design
tonight.
What
we're
looking
for
is
further
feedback
that
you
know
again
involve
the
community.
What
what
we
have
asked
of
mr
goddard
is
to
take
some
of
those
ideas
and
put
them
in
some
concepts.
These
certainly
are
not
the
final
concepts
and
you
can
interchange
any
of
the
amenities.
B
As
far
as
the
basketball
court
goes,
it
was
never
our
intention
to
remove
the
basketball
court
without
giving
the
community
the
ability
to
play
basketball,
so
the
proposed
volleyball
court,
for
instance,
could
be
replaced
with
a
basketball
court.
The
reason
why
it
was
not
listed
in
the
original
was
because
this
is
a
relatively
small
park.
We
wanted
to
fit
as
much
in
for
the
community
as
we
could.
B
There
is
a
basketball
court,
two
blocks
west
or
at
penman
park.
That
is
rarely
used.
It's
a
beautiful
little
court,
it's
not
used,
and
so
there
is
opportunity
there.
As
far
as
the
ball
field
go.
B
I
think
what
mr
goddard
has
done
is
taken
that
listing,
and
in
that
listing
we
got
a
lot
of
requests
for
a
multi-purpose
field
and
the
community
green
that
you
see
in
each
one
of
those
concepts
is,
in
effect
the
multi-purpose
field.
B
C
Well,
the
feedback
I've
received
the
initial
feedback
I've
received
is
that
the
citizens
wouldn't
wouldn't
want
to
lose
a
ball
field.
I
mean
there's
two
there
now
and
I
guess
the
thought
was
that
could
we
keep
one
ball
field
and
then
you
know
have
some
community
space
as
well.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
possible,
but
something
something
to
consider.
D
I
would
agree,
I
mean
there
is
room
for
a
ball
field
that
the
the
ball
fields
that
are
there
now
the
outfield
space
does
take.
I
would
say,
probably
a
third
of
the
park
area
for
one
ball
field,
overlapping.
That
with
some
area
might
be
possible.
If
you
don't
include
a
fence,
but
but
there
is
room
for
for
that.
If
that's
what
the
community
wants.
E
B
There
was
a
total
of
48
people
what
we
did.
Originally
we
sent
an
email
out
to
all
respondents
to
the
parks
assessment
that
lived
around
gonzales
and
there
was
about
60
of
those,
and
so
we
sent
out
an
email
to
all
of
those,
and
I
think
ms
golding
also
sent
out
to
the
community
that
she
has
contact
with.
So
we
had
a
total
of
about
48
responses.
E
Was
there
a
specific
reason
why
basketball,
courts
and
baseball
fields
were
not
included?
Okay,
so
we
know
about
the
basketball
because
it's
they
can
go
to
penman,
but
why
not
the
baseball
I've
received
an
email.
The
whole
council
received
an
email
today
on
how
wingate
park
gets
very
busy
through
all
of
the
the
organized
baseball
play,
and
so,
if
you
just
want
to
play
a
game
of
baseball
those,
that's
not
a
readily
available
option
for
people.
E
So
I
I
understand
that
you
can
do
it
on
the
open
field,
but
I
think
there's
something
there's
a
different
essence.
When
you
see
the
diamond
and
you're
able
you
know
where
the
lines
are
and
such
otherwise
you're
just
playing
in
somebody's
backyard,
breaking
a
window
when
you
hit
the
ball
a
little
bit
too
far
to
the
left
or
right,
not
that
we've
done
that
at
all
growing
up,
but
usually
our
own
windows.
B
So
yeah
the
the
initial
thought
was
that
we
would
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
at
wingate
to
see
how
we
could
accommodate
baseball
or
softball.
If
we
ran
out
of
capacity
there,
then
we
were
going
to
look
to
approach
jacks
beach
elementary.
They
have
a
beautiful
little
field
that
is
rarely
used.
B
We
have
a
relationship
with
cb
seabreeze
elementary
now,
where
we
maintain
the
field
and
we
get
usage
of
it.
So
we
certainly
didn't
want
to
disenfranchise
what
we
were
looking
at.
The
overall
picture
was
what
would
provide
the
greatest
use
of
that
space?
B
E
So
when
we
look
at
baseball,
is
it
like
a
I
don't
I
don't
play
baseball
or
softball?
Is
it
a
full-size
field
that
we're
looking
at
or
is
it
like
a
kid
size
feel
because
little
people,
the
kids,
aren't
going
to
hit
it
as
far
as
the
adults.
E
Okay,
all
right,
so
it's
a
smaller
footprint
versus
the
ones,
some
of
them
at
wingate
that
it's
more
for
league
play
where
there
are
specifications
of
the
field.
E
All
right
and
you're
looking
at
youth
for
gonzales.
Yes,
if
we
were
to
put
one
there
final
question,
the
has
nothing
to
do
with
baseball
or
basketball.
I
do
think
that
we
may
be
over
planning
for
community
gardens.
I
love
community
gardens.
I
think
it's
a
wonderful
idea,
I
just
don't
think
our
population
or
our
future
population.
E
Would
be
using
up
all
of
those
community
garden
lots?
I
think
people
love
the
idea
of
community
gardens
until
they
actually
have
to
do
the
gardening
and
then
it's
not
so
cool
anymore.
So
it's
better.
If
somebody
else
does
the
gardening
and
they
can
eat
the
the
fruits
of
others
laborers
so
to
say
so
we
might
want
to
pull
back
on
some
of
the
community
gardens.
E
I
can
see
you
know,
maybe
a
dozen,
maybe
with
the
caveat
that
that
neighborhood
is
changing
and
with
the
townhouses
that
are
going
there,
they're
losing
yards,
and
so
those
who
do
want
to
have
a
garden.
I
have
a
garden
in
the
back
of
a
couple
of
them,
but
it's
because
I
have
a
backyard
and
some
of
the
houses
that
it's
like
a
whole
block.
E
There
they're
not
going
to
have
that
that
dirt
space
to
be
able
to
plant
the
garden
so
and
that
I'm
just
thinking
that
that's
an
over
build
for
an
area
that
has
other
than
that
one
block
with
the
townhouses
there's
a
lot
of
green
space
in
people's
backyards,
where
they
can
do
their
own
gardens.
D
Yes,
I
also
received
the
emails
about
the
diamonds
and
the
basketball
courts
being
removed
yeah.
I
I
went
and
played
kickball
a
couple
weeks
ago,
but
unfortunately
we
got
rained
on
so
we
had
to
leave.
I
know
on
the
plan,
one
of
the
plans,
I
think,
on
plan
c,
where
it
says,
remove
existing
parking
and
adding
new
parking
spaces.
D
I
do
like
the
fact
that
the
pickle
pickleball
courts
were
added
and
the
the
sand
volleyball,
but
I
do
have
to
agree
with
my
colleagues
councilmember
dumont
and
golding
as
well,
but
I
am
glad
to
see
that
finally
we're
moving
forward
with
gonzalez
park,
he
needs
a
lot
of
love.
So
that's
my
input.
F
Thanks
mike,
I'm
really
glad
that
I'm
hearing
sorry
there's
a
puppy.
D
F
My
colleagues
echo
some
of
the
same
concerns
that
I
had
with
these
renderings.
I
I
think
we've
missed
the
mark
here,
big
time
and
if
I
could
go
back
to
the
point
where
we
said
where
jason
wanted
us
just
to
put
pickleball
courts
over
in
that
circle
area
that
I
hate,
I
would
go
back
to
that
and
just
go
with
that,
because
I
really
don't
think
that
this
is.
This
is
a
beautiful.
These
are
beautiful
options
here,
but
they're
not
hang
on.
F
C
E
That's
all
the
bar,
the
yeah
yeah,
okay,
yeah.
F
That's
a
dog
that
saw
somebody
walking
inside
the
front
door.
I
don't
know
if
I'm
to
be
able
to
stop
her.
So
my
the
biggest
area
of
concern
with
this
in
looking
at
gonzales
park,
hyper
hush,
where
the
the
propensity
of
homeless
to
hang
out
at
the
park-
and
I
think
we
all
agreed
that
we
were
going
to
make.
F
G
Yes,
so
I
I
don't
want
to
sound
like
the
echo
chamber,
I
do
believe
that
there
should
be
a
basketball
court
there
as
well.
Maybe
it's
just
a
redesign
of
where
it
needs
to
be
is
is
a
thoughtful
thing.
Maybe
the
current
location
is
not
the
ideal
location
but
food
for
thought.
Maybe
this
is
not
the
exact
time
to
say
it,
maybe
for
future
briefings.
G
G
I
think
when
we
first
met
mike,
we
talked
about
that
that
space
is
kind
of
like
an
l
shape
and
if
we
had
to
bleed
over
some
of
gonzales
into
that
area
and
develop
that
area,
it's
something
we
could
talk
about
at
a
future
briefing.
But
I
do
love
the
concept
of
multi-use
field
space,
whether
it's
a
combination
of
a
basketball,
volleyball
court
and
it's
striped
appropriately.
And
that
way
you
know
if
it's
not
being
used
for
basketball
to
use
for
volleyball.
Or
what
have
you.
G
H
Well,
jason,
I
mean
I
appreciate
the
effort
of
coming
up
with
alternatives
about
you
know
the
fact
that
y'all
actually
addressed
internally,
where
basketball
can
be
played
and
if
it's
two
blocks
away
on
a
on
a
court,
that's
not
being
used,
maybe
that's
a
viable
option,
but
I
would
like
to
see.
I
would
like
to
see
it
in
writing
some
of
the
the
options
for
the
the
the
baseball
field,
as
well
as
the
basketball
court.
H
Obviously,
from
a
maintenance
standpoint,
the
clay
on
the
court
on
the
baseball
field
is
from
a
maintenance.
Perspective
is
pretty
difficult
to
deal
with
if
you
have
to
drag
it
on
a
regular
basis
to
really
make
it
be
able
to
utilize
it,
but
it
also
makes
that
area
almost
non-useful
to
anybody
else
and
if
there
are
options
within
the
city
that
aren't
currently
being
used,
I
think
that
can
appease
everybody,
because
right
now
I
would
say
those
two
fields
take
up
60
of
the
park.
H
So
if
you're
going
to
keep
both
of
them
and
then,
if
you
remove
one
of
them,
then
the
way
it's
open
up.
If
you
have
any
fields
over
there
and
people
are
playing,
I
mean
it
does
become
a
safety
issue
with
fly,
balls
and
and
everything
else,
so
I'm
not
as
long
as
there
is
viable
alternatives
for
basketball
and
the
baseball
fields
for
practice
within
our
community
that
are
not
currently
being
utilized
properly.
I
think
that
is
good,
but
I
mean
it's
they
do
it.
H
H
B
A
Jason
before
we
go
on
to
the
next
comment,
a
quick
question
for
you:
was
it
your
intention
to
have
some
type
of
a
concept
that
you
could
pull
out
to
the
community
and
receive
community
feedback
at
some
type
of
an
open
house
or
a
workshop
type
setting
to
to
hear
what
the
residents
of
the
area
actually
say.
B
Absolutely
because
we
do
understand
mike
that
you
know,
48
responses
may
not
reflect
the
entire
community
and
we,
you
know
our
goal-
is
to
get
give
everybody
an
equal
opportunity
to
voice
their
input
and
give
us
the
feedback.
So,
yes,
that
was
the
goal
to
give
mr
goddard
some
direction
tonight
to
perhaps
narrow
it
down
to
one
concept
that
you
know
he
could
have
certain
amenities
and
take
that
out
to
the
community
for
their
feedback
and
then
bring
it
back
to
council
before
we
finalize
the
design.
I
E
I
A
couple
of
thoughts
is
I've,
seen
it
I've.
I've
been
in
contact
with
the
individual
who
reached
out.
I
knew
him
from
a
while
back
on
the
campaign
trail
and
well.
I
do
understand
the
concern
of
losing
the
baseball
field
per
se,
the
diamond.
I
I
I
don't
think
that
putting
a
multi-use
field
that
is
grasped
loses
the
ability
to
play
baseball
and
softball.
I
played
when
I
was
a
kid.
I
played
baseball
in
softball
and
not
softball.
Sorry,
I
played
baseball
and
you
know
not
all
the
time
was
it
a
perfect
clay
diamond
he
played
on
grass,
you
played
it.
If
you
went
to
a
a
park
you
played
on
the
grass
in
the
park
and
we
had
little
bases
that
we
put
down,
and
I
don't
I
didn't.
I've
never
felt
like.
I
I
was
being
shortchanged
as
a
kid
because
I
wasn't
on
a
clay
field,
but
I
I
think
that
it
allowing
it
to
be
a
multi-use
field
allows
for
so
many
sports
allows
for
baseball,
softball,
lacrosse
soccer
football
and
all
these
sports
can
live
in
harmony,
whereas
if
it's
clay
and
you
get
tackled
you're
playing
a
tackle
or
a
football
game-
and
you
go
down
on
that
clay-
I
mean
it
hurts.
I
made
some
slides
in
baseball
practice
with
shorts
and
got
skinned
up.
I
You
know
it
happens,
so
I
think
that
it
just
the
grass
just
gives
us
so
many
more
possibilities
for
the
residents
of
all
over
to
use
that
park
and
maybe
putting
a
backstop,
maybe
keeping
the
backstop.
There
preserves
the
the
baseball
field
design,
but
allows
it
to
be
grasped.
Maybe
that's
an
alternative.
I
do.
I
think
we
should
really.
I
While
we
had
a
lot
of
designs,
I
think
the
alter
you
know
we
should
focus
on
the
multi-use
field,
the
pickleball,
the
shaded
playground
with
new
equipment,
the
things
that
the
top
ideas
for
the
residents
the
community
garden
was
was
pretty
far
down
there.
Some
of
the
other
ideas
that
were
thrown
in
is
sand
volleyball.
I
I
just
some
of
those
ideas
that
gained
just
a
little
bit
of
response.
I
feel
like
we
should
focus
on
the
big
picture
ones
and
do
those
big
picture
ones
really.
Well,
it's
a
not
a
huge
space.
I
So
that's
my
personal
is,
is
focus
on
the
playground,
pickleball
and
a
really
nice
multi-use
field
and
make
it
a
you
know.
Do
do
a
few
things
really
well,
instead
of
trying
to
do
10
things
kind
of
half-hearted,
because
it
is
limited
funds
as
well.
We
don't
want
to.
We
don't
have
a
billion
dollars
to
throw
into
this
park.
B
So
if
I
could
just
answer
mr
stokes
there
mike
so
certainly
when
and
and
this
kind
of
goes
to
mr
nichols's
question
in
how
did
we
put
the
survey
out
the
survey
and-
and
I
will
send
the
the
original
email
to
all
council
so
they
could
see-
we
were
not
trying
to
disenfranchise
any
uses
of
the
park,
but
we
simply
took
the
parks
assessment,
the
recommendations
made
in
the
in
there
and
sent
them
out
to
the
community
saying
you
know
this
is
the
feedback
we
got.
B
What
would
you
guys
like
to
see
in
the
ideal
park
and
the
multi-purpose
field
was
one
of
the
top?
I
think
the
top
item
was
the
shade
and
then
followed
by
upgrading
the
restrooms
and
then
the
third
item
was
a
multi-purpose
field,
and
certainly
you
know
the
sentiments
that
you
just
echoed
in
terms
of
you
know.
What's
the
best
use
of
the
field
you
know,
can
we
still
play
baseball
or
softball
on
a
grass
field?
You
know
all
of
those
went
into
the
thinking
and
the
information
that
we
provided
to
mr
goddard.
A
Thank
you,
jason
councilor
meza,
followed
by
mayor
hoffman,.
D
Yes,
I
I
am
looking
at
the
google
maps
of
gonzales
park
and
I
know
councilmember
sandy
was
talking
about.
D
Maybe
just
keeping
one
baseball
diamond
is
there
a
way
that
we
could
maybe
get
a
designer
to
do
a
concert
with
want
baseball
diamond
and
then
two
baseball
diamonds,
then
the
other
half
obviously
either
move
the
basketball
court,
the
the
playground,
obviously
the
bathroom
and
see
if
he
could
incorporate
some
of
the
great
idea
of
the
great
assets
that
he
did
on
the
other
designs
into
that
section,
because
I
know
sometimes,
when
I
drive
around
there,
I
see
t-ball
going
on
practices
and
all
sorts
of
things,
but
yeah
I'm
looking
at
it
right
now
and
obviously
I
could
see
that
it
it's.
D
F
All
right,
the
dog
is
quiet,
I
think
she's
in
my
closet
eating
shoes.
It's
the
sacrifice,
I'm
willing
to
make,
but
to
go
back.
I
I.
I
am
a
little
disappointed,
I'm
a
lot
disappointed
in
in
this
redesign
or
on
the
concepts
I
think
we're
going
for
form
over
function,
and
this
is
a
a
neighborhood
community
park
that
I
think
loses
a
lot
of
the
function
that
it
previously
had
and
then
adds
in
some
of
the
problems
that
I
have
with
it.
F
You
guys
all
heard
me
say
that
that
sidewalk
around
nothing
in
the
southeast
corner
of
the
park
is
never
touched.
It's
never
used
and
I
feel
like
we
just
added
eight
more
sidewalks
around
nothing
to
this
park,
and
so
it's
almost
hard
for
me
to
even
get
past
that
I
am
I
I
love
it.
The
idea
of
a
community
garden
in
theory.
F
I
want
to
be
a
community
that
has
a
community
garden,
but
I
think
in
execution
and
maintenance
there's
a
lot
that
can
go
wrong
and
just
the
how
they
look
after
a
while
just
drive
by
the
one
on
jarbo
in
jarvo
park
on
off
florida,
and
it's
it's
not
necessarily
something
I'd
want
to
live
next
door
to
to
be
honest
with
you
and
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
most.
Everyone
in
that
area
is
in
a
single
family
with
a
yard.
F
I
think
that
we
have
we're
replicating
some
things.
Sand.
Volleyball
is
obviously
something
we
have
a
lot
of
on
the
beach
and
at
sunshine
park.
Let's
see
we
have.
We
have
two
diamonds
there.
So,
even
if
we
took
out
one
of
the
diamonds,
we
would
buy
ourselves
a
lot
of
space
and
the
people
that
I
see
most
frequently
using
those
diamonds
are
not
baseball
or
t-ball,
but
are
kickball
and
it's
adult
kickball
league.
So
those
balls
don't
go
as
far.
They
don't
hurt
as
much
and
they
rarely
break
a
window.
F
F
I
think
it
looks
very
pretty,
but
I
don't
know
that
this
is
really
a
functional
park
and
what
we
need
at
this
point
so
so
for
me,
I
would
say
that
I
wouldn't
even
start
modifying
any
one
of
these
plans
because
they're
so
far
off
off
the
mark.
For
me
for
what
I
want
and
again
this
is
the
park
that
I
drive
by
twice
a
day.
F
So
I
see
it
a
lot,
it's
around
the
corner
from
my
house,
so
I
have
a
very
keen
interest
in
making
sure
that
we
do
something
really
good
with
it
to
make
the
neighbors
and
everybody
uses
it
really
proud.
E
Thank
you.
I
agree
with
chris
and
when
I
said
keeping
a
diamond,
I
guess
that
you
all
I'm
don't
necessarily
mean
clay.
I
mean
there's
some
kind
of
a
set.
This
is
the
diamond.
It
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
clay
and
raked,
and
all
that
stuff,
but
some
kind
of
a
you
know
that's
first
base,
second
third
and
home.
So
something
to
that
effect,
not
necessarily
the
mounded
run
way
kind
of
things.
E
I
let
I
I
was
happy
to
hear
that
we're
really
looking
at
getting
feedback
for
a
couple
more
designs
to
bring
it
back
to
the
community.
I
think
that
that
would
lessen
the
need
for
another
survey,
because
the
survey
just
by
its
nature,
is
going
to
be
a
very
small
representation
of
those
who
would
use
that
area
where,
if
you
could
do
or
if
we
could
do
some
kind
of
community
feedback
in
the
park
like
on
a
saturday
when
people
would
use
the
park
we'd
get
far
more
input
than
through
a
survey.
E
So
the
survey
is
a
good
place,
even
though
there's
that
floor
of
not
law,
of
not
having
basketball
and
baseball
included
in
that.
But
I
still
think
that
this
meeting
is
providing
mr
guarded
with
a
lot
of
information
that
he
can
take
this
and
use
this,
as
well
as
some
of
the
survey
information
to
develop
a
couple
more
plans
that
we
can
then
present
to
the
neighborhood
in
that
area.
C
Just
to
piggyback
on
some
of
the
things
that
have
already
been
said,
I
do
agree
with
miss
dumont
that
yeah
I'm
not.
I
don't
know
that
we
have
to
have
clay,
but
if
we
could
have
some
a
field
set
up
in
such
a
way
that
it's
easy
for
people
to
use
it
as
a
as
a
softball
or
baseball
field,
you
know
I.
I
think
that
that
would
be
great.
I
also
agree
with
the
mayor:
the
volleyball
court.
C
We've
we've
got
so
many
volleyball
courts
on
the
beach
already.
I
don't
really
think
that
we
need
honestly,
I
think,
having
one.
There
is
probably
not
enough
you,
you
know
you
can't
just
have
one
so
I
I
would
opt
to
just
not
have
one
at
all
and
then
we
focus
on
other
things.
C
I
definitely
want
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
some
natural
shade
in
the
park
like
tree
shade,
as
well
as
whatever
structural
shade
we
need
to
have,
but
I
have
to
I
have
to
say
to
the
mayor's
comment
about
the
the
you
know:
paths
going
nowhere.
C
I
know
that
in
the
dog
park
and
there
was
a
a
walking
path
that
was
put
in
and
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
actually
use
that,
and
I
think
that
if
the
paths
were
done
right
that
maybe
it
would
be-
and
I
know
at
jarvo
park
when
I
go
to
jarvo
park-
you
see
people
walking
those
paths
a
lot.
So
I'm
not.
C
C
It
would
be
something
that
would
be
usable,
but
also
it's
obvious
that
this
is
what
this
is
supposed
to.
Be
it's
not
just
a
path
to
take
you
to
the
playground
or
whatever,
and
you
know,
and
just
to
give
you
additional
input-
yeah,
the
community
garden.
I
was
surprised
when
I
saw
that
in
there
and
I'm
just
not
really
sure
that
that's
what
we
want
to
have
in
in
gonzales
park.
I
definitely
like
the
idea
of
having
the
different
aged
playground
areas.
C
You
know
so
that
you
can
have
a
playground
for
the
little
ones
and
then
something
for
the
older
kids,
and
you
know
the
three
different
age
groups
I
thought
was
really
good
and,
and
I'm
you
know,
I'd
be
okay
with
the
addition
of
the
pickleball
courts
like
we
have
there,
so
I
just
wanted
to
give
the
give
you
the
additional
feedback
on
some
of
the
things
that
were
put
into
some
of
in
these
concepts
and
the
things
that
I
think
are
more
important.
C
D
H
As
for
the
walking
path,
that's
out
there,
I
just
think
it's
because
it's
it's
very
small,
I
think
a
path
around
the
exterior
of
the
whole
park
is
really
what
makes
sense.
I
think
that's
what
the
mayor
was
trying
to
was
trying
to
convey
the
small
circles
to
nowhere,
don't
make
a
lot
of
sense,
but
a
kind
of
a
mixed-use
kind
of
path
that
has
trees
and
everything
too,
I
think
that's
a
good
place
to
go
and
and
for
people
to
walk
and
and
stuff.
H
H
I
think
is
really
important
and
really,
I
think,
one
of
the
main
reasons
we
really
started
talking
about
this
is
to
reduce
the
level
of
vagrancy
out
there
and
the
way
you
do
that
is
by
getting
as
many
people
in
the
neighborhood
to
utilize
the
park,
the
more
the
more
residents
are
there,
the
less
vagrants
are
there.
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
key
issues
so
going
through
an
analysis
determining
what
is
going
to
bring
the
most
people
to
the
most
residents
to
the
park.
H
Whatever
you,
whatever
you,
do,
please
get
rid
of
all
the
sand.
Spurs
I
mean
I
is.
It
is
really
it's
really
atrocious,
so
I
think
you
know
re
either
the
the
non-grass
grass
looking
field,
those
like
we
have
in
south
jacksonville.
I
think
those
are
outstanding
or
if
it's
fiscally,
not
a
possibility
at
this
time.
You
know
we
almost
do
need
to
go
in
and
recreate
the
the
base
that
the
the
grass
is
planted
on
in
order
to
eradicate
the
sand
spurs
and
the
other
weeds.
H
D
Yes
question:
I
know
kevin
swimmer,
chet
and
councilmember
corey
nichols
just
brought
up
the
multi
surface
field
now
obviously
depends
on
the
budget
that
we
have,
for
the
part,
is,
is
artificial,
turf,
a
possibility
in
certain
areas
of
gonzales
park,
especially
around
the
dives.
B
That
would
be
purely
a
budget
issue,
mr
meza,
but
but
I
will
say
this,
I'm
very
confident
in
our
ground
staff
to
bring
that
field
back
up
to
a
very
nice
playable
standard.
B
Well,
that's
what
I
said
at
the
beginning.
Trevor
was
heading
up
this
project
very
confident
and
by
the
way,
mr
nichols,
the
the
trees
that
you
see
in
these
renderings
are
going
to
be
part
of
the
jacksonville
tree.
Commission
we've
talked
with
them.
This
is
a
separate
project
to
the
other,
one
that
we're
working
on.
D
Well,
it's
really
conceptually
it's
just
an
area
for
small
kids
to
roll
around.
It's
raised,
berms,
just
grass,
it's
a
it's
not
flat
ground,
it's
just
an
area
for
kids
to
climb
and
roll
and
play
and
hide,
and
that
kind
of
thing.
So
it
it's
somewhat
of
a
leftover
space,
but
I
used
it
just
to
create
a
different
sort
of
area.
A
That's
the
last
of
our
hands
being
raised.
Do
you
two
feel
like
you've
got
a
a
lot
of
good
direction
from
council
tonight
of
where
to
take
perhaps
revised
concept?
Personally,
yes,.
D
I
I
appreciate
all
the
comments.
They've
all
been
very
helpful.
I
yeah,
obviously
I'll
speak
with
jason
and
trevor
after
this
meeting,
we'll
figure
out
where
to
go
where
to
go,
but
I've
got
a
very
good
idea
about
what
you
all
are
looking
for
now,.
A
A
Jason
also
has
item
number
two,
which
is
revisions
to
the
special
events,
policy
and
jason
I'll.
Let
you
take
it
from
there.
B
So
the
revision
to
the
special
events
policy
was
brought
up
again
earlier
in
the
year,
I
believe
by
the
mayor.
At
the
time
we
brought
the
co-sponsorship
policy
to
the
council.
B
E
E
Okay
says
any
net
income
from
the
special
event
must
be
donated
to
the
city
of
jacksonville
beach,
unless
an
alternate
distribution
of
the
net
income
is
specifically
allowed
in
the
contract
approved
by
city
council,
and
then
I
write,
I
understand
the
need
to
the
income
statement
and
the
cpa
report,
but
I
can't
recall
why
this
is
why
this
part
is
there.
Non-Profits
are
supposed
to
generate
a
profit
to
invest
back
into
the
organization,
so
in
other
words,
any
net
profit.
E
B
So
mremont,
I
was
not
part
of
the
original
amendment
back
in
august
of
2017,
but
I
think
the
intent
there
going
back
and
reading
the
minutes
and
and
and
doing
the
research
that
was
available
to
me.
I
think
the
intent
was
that
the
administration
did
not
want
non-profits
to
come
and
take
advantage
of.
You
know
the
the
area
to
profit.
B
The
the
the
wording
was
such
that
or
is
such
that
I
think
the
council
would
have
to
approve
if
the
prophet
would
go
back
to
the
non-profit.
From
that
event,
that
was
my
understanding,
and
I
think
that
was
brought
up
in
in
the
last
council
meeting
that
we
had
with
the
former
city
attorney.
E
Yeah
that
just
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
because
non-profits
hold
events
to
make
a
profit
unless
you're
a
a
non-profit.
That's
just
there
to
raise
awareness.
The
whole
purpose
is
to
raise
money
for
the
organization,
so
they
can
continue
to
do
whatever
it
is
that
they
do
so.
I
am
unsure
about
section
1h
and
how
that
could
better
apply
that
one's
another
fire
department.
One
can.
F
I
jump
in
on
that
one
really
quick
before
you
get
too
much
further
away.
Sure
that's
the
page
28.
I
mean
that's
a
the
city
contracted
event
is
different
than
a
special
event,
so
this
would
be
something
like
the
art
walk
or
the
car
cruise
or
deck
the
chairs,
and
so
they
that
almost
pulls
out
into.
I
can't
remember
what
the
new
category
is,
that
we
called
it.
So
basically
it
was
to
prevent.
F
I
mean
I
guess
it
doesn't
I
mean
deck.
The
chairs
does
does
generate
revenue
for
their
organization,
but
I
I
think
that
this
isn't
supposed
to
be
for,
like
the
buddy
walk
or
whatever
that's
a
special
event.
This
is
a
different
category,
so
I
think
that's
why
it's
distinguished
there.
B
E
Yeah,
I
understand
that
part
wanting
to
know
where
the
profits
were
going,
but
the
profits
should
be
going
back
into
the
nonprofit
and
if
it's
a
viable
and
when
you
say-
and
I
think
non-profit
as
we-
I
don't.
I
printed
this
out
today,
but
I
don't
know
if
it's.
If
it's
specifically
notes
501c3
or
501c,
there
are
26
27
other
types
of
five
non-profit
organizations,
but
if
it
doesn't
specifically
note
501c3,
those
are
the
public
charities,
then
it
should.
E
My
next
question
is
on
page
28,
appendix
1,
section
c:
it
does
not
state
alcohol
may
be
sold,
distributed
and
or
consumed
in
this
area,
which
is
rental
area
c.
Was
that
an
oversight
or
was
that
intentional.
E
H
I
had
a
couple
of
people
reach
out
to
me
that
are
want
to
look
at
this
further,
that
it
has
gotten
fairly
convoluted
with
the
changes
have
been
made
over
the
years,
and
I
think
with
the
transition
that
we're
making
that
we
really
need
to
really
look
at
this
whole
special
events
policy
in
whole
and
maybe
get
some
resident
input
and
some
input
to
see
how
often
we
want
to
use
it.
H
You
know
I'm
not
not
being
able
to
charge
really
limits.
The
ability
to
put
on
good,
really
high
quality
shows
there.
I
mean,
I
think
there
should
be
some
avenue
that
occasionally
that
you
know
we
bring
in
a
somehow
have
a
a-list
or
b-list
person
coming
because
I
mean
these
musicians
do
like
to
play.
You
know
unique
venues,
so
I
just
think
the
whole
policy
kind
of
needs
to
be
cleaned
up
and
looked
at
and
see
what
we
can
do
to
better
utilize
that
that
area
for
the
benefit
of
the.
F
I
agree
with
mr
nichols.
I
think,
in
the
fact
that
this
policy
is
really
you
can
tell
it's
been
kind
of
frankenstein
over
the
years,
and
I
pulled
up
the
version
that
we
have
on
our
website
and
there's
still
some
kind
of
markups
on
it
that
didn't
get
get
fully
included,
but
there's
a
lot
of
repetition
in
terms
of
procedures.
F
There's
a
lot
of
things
that
just
could
be
consolidated,
because
if
you
haven't,
if
you
have
something
repeated
and
you
have
to
change
it
once,
then
you
have
to
find
it
everywhere
else.
I
just
think
there's
a
lot
of
unnecessarily
unnecessary
repetition
in
here
in
general,
so
I
think
we've
come
far
enough
that
maybe
it's
time
and
then
even
looking
in
the
red
line
version,
you
can't
even
really
read
it
in
the
one
that
was
in
the
packet.
F
A
couple
things
that
I
would
like
to
see
us
do
is
allow
for
the
option
for
to
go
back
to
three
day
events
it
with.
However
many
restrictions
you
want
to
put
on
it.
We've
had
a
few
events
that
have
talked
to
us
on
the
surfer
girl
surf
tournament.
That's
coming
up
soon
wanted
to
do
a
concert
on
friday
and
they
have
their
saturday
and
their
sunday
events
they've
they're,
not
interested
in
doing
that
anymore,
but
at
the
time
we
didn't
allow
for
that.
F
So
I
think
we
are
missing
out
on
some
good
stuff
in
that
we
we
don't
allow
for
three
days,
it's
really
expensive,
to
set
up
all
that
production
even
for
an
event
that
I
think,
arguably
we
would
all
want
to
see
here
in
our
community
and
see
it
do
well
like
the
what's
it
called.
Is
it
the
surfer
girl,
the
the
women's
surf
tournament
in
anyway?
You
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
F
F
I
was
approached
by
someone
who
wants
to
do
a
very
high-end
boat
show
where
they
would
put
boats
all
in
lathan,
plaza
and
charge
to
go
to
latham
plaza,
but
our
we
only
addressed
the
capacity
that
you
can
only
charge
for
half
in
sea
walk
pavilion,
so
does
that
mean
they
could
charge
for
latham
plaza?
F
I
think
you
could
make
an
argument
for
that
in
terms
of
the
process
and
we've
already
talked
about
this.
Nowhere
in
the
process
are
we
sending
people
the
special
event
policies,
and
I
think
that
that's
an
important
piece
that
we're
missing
something
that
I've
also
noticed,
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
just
something
that
bothers
me
and
not
anybody
else,
but
I'm
seeing
a
lot
of.
F
We
have
beer
and
wine
and
that's
fine,
that's
allowed,
but
a
lot
of
kind
of
things
that
look
like
liquor
or
are
potentially
misleading
to
the
customer.
Even
at
an
alcohol-free
event
that
are,
you
know
they
say
pina
colada
and
you
pay.
You
know
12
bucks
or
whatever
for
this
big
pineapple.
Well,
it
doesn't
have
any
liquor
in
it
and
they
never
said
it
does,
but
they're
calling
it
pinafada.
So
I
think,
there's
and
then
there's
some
that
it's
the
wine
flake
the
rum
flavored
wine
to
make
a
drink.
F
So
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
address
that
or
just
let
it
go
since
they're
not
technically
violating
the
rules.
The
other
thing
that
came
up
when
we
were
talking
about
orange
crush
was
renting
the
beach
and
booking
out
space
on
the
beach,
and
we
don't
really.
We
kind
of
have
one
line
about.
F
Sir
contest
can't
be
within
300
feet
of
the
pier,
so
I
think
we
we
need
to
talk
about
it
if
we
want
to
address
that
a
little
more
thoroughly,
and
that's
all
that's
all
my
notes,
but
I
think
there's
a
lot.
I
think
this
is
worth
pulling
it
open
and
putting
it
back
together
again
and
not
just
continuing
to
edit
this
document,
because
I
think
it's
getting
it's
getting
a
little
out
of
hand.
F
With
regards
to
the
surf
contest,
the
beach
so
yeah,
so
the
discussion
was:
can
you
rent
the
beach?
Can
you
rent
space
on
the
beach?
Can
you
put
tents,
and
can
you
put
stages
up
and
we
don't
really
have
anything
that
specifically
addresses
that,
and
I
think
that
we
should.
A
Let
me
do
this
before
going
to
counselor
stokes
only
because
I
don't
want
to
reinvent
the
wheel
here.
Is
there
a
consensus
by
council
that
there
should
be
a
full
revisit
of
the
special
event
policy
or
a
desire
to
do
it,
I'm
seeing
a
consensus.
A
So
what
we'll
do
is?
Are
you
comfortable
with
having
this
be
one
of
the
first
projects
that
we
give
to
our
new
city
attorney
to
work
with
council?
I,
those
things
went
up
fast.
A
We
will
pick
a
briefing
date
in
the
fall,
and
this
will
be
the
only
item
that
we
will
place
on
the
agenda
and
it
will
be
an
opportunity
for
the
council
and
the
attorney
and
staff
to
work
through
what
the
appropriate
structure
of
a
new
policy
should
look
like
and
then
from
there
we'll
let
the
attorney
take
a
stab
at
the
first
draft
of
what
a
revised
policy
looks
like
because
again
it
sounds
like
what
we're
talking
about
is
is
basically
not
just
tweaking
individual
sections
but
a
complete
overhaul.
A
So
it
may
need
to
be
along
those
lines,
but
again
I
don't
want
to
spend
the
next
half
hour
just
going
through
individual
issues
that
you
all
might
have
to
it,
because
the
reality
is,
if
we're
going
to
rewrite
it,
it'll
be
rewritten
at
that
time.
A
So,
if
you're
comfortable
with
that
we'll
plan
for
it
coming
back
in
the
fall,
probably
somewhere,
I'm
guessing
in
november
and
we'll
have
just
one
whole
meeting
reserved
for
it
and
we
can
put
everything
out
on
the
table
of
what
you
want
to
see
in
terms
of
content
and
how
it
would
actually
operate
sound
good,
I'm
seeing
consensus
of
ed's
nodding
all
right,
jason,
you
good
with
that
too.
I'm
good!
Thank
you
mike
all
right
with
that.
We'll
move
on
to
topic
number
three.
A
Yep
and
councillor
dumont
and
councillor
stokes.
If
you
still
wanted
to
comment
on
the
topic.
E
Yeah,
just
a
broader
comment,
not
a
specific
stuff.
When
we
have
the
city
attorney.
Look
at
the
events
policy.
I
would
like
council
to
agree
at
least
in
broadness
as
to
what
we
are
looking
for,
because
I
have
a
feeling
we
are
not
on
the
same
page
as
to
how
we
see
our
downtown
space
being
used,
and
you
cannot
form
a
good
policy
unless
you
have
a
good
end
game
that
you're
trying
to
reach.
E
A
You're
absolutely
correct,
and
I
believe,
when
we
get
to
tomorrow's
budget
review,
one
of
the
things
you'll
see
from
mr
fatis
is
that
we
had
doing
some
surveys
to
find
out
what
type
of
events
downtown
the
community
actually
wants
to
see
and
would
benefit
from
not
just
necessarily
what
staff
wants
to
see
or
an
individual
sector
of
the
community,
but
the
community
as
a
whole.
So
agreed.
You
can't
create
a
policy
unless
you
know
what
it
is
you're
trying
to
actually
do
to
activate
the
downtown
councilor
stokes.
I
Yeah
thanks
for
interrupting
me
mike
because
you
were
saying
what
I
wanted
to
say,
but
kind
of
another
thing
that
I
noticed
it
and
I
kind
of
agreed
with
the
committee's
report
of
that
releasing
any
type
of
balloon
or
sky
lantern
is
prohibited.
I
I'm
just
wondering
if
this
would
be
a
good
time
to
see
if
there's
a
consensus
for
an
ordinance.
I
don't
know
if
that
can
be.
I
don't
know
if
that
can
be
done
right
now,
but
I
think
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
counselor
golding
had
brought
that
up
in
the
past
and
now
that
the
committee
here
is
identifying
it
for
special
events.
I
think
that
it
is
identifying
that
that
is
an
issue
during
special
events,
but
is
also
an
issue
outside
of
special
events.
I
A
Councilor
stokes,
we
do
already
have
an
ordinance
that
is
drafted
for
that.
We
wanted
a
new
attorney
on
board
before
we
bring
it
to
council
for
discussion
and
as
I've
been
saying
internally
of
the
organization
and
to
a
couple
council
members
drafting
the
ordinance
is
easy
enforcing.
It
is
really
where
it
becomes
an
issue
and
we'd
want
to
have
a
conversation
with
council
about
the
expectations
of
enforcement
before
an
ordinance
like
that
gets
put
in
place,
and
that's
another
reason
why
the
chief
smith
is
on
the
line
tonight.
A
J
Hi
good
evening,
everybody,
I
hope
everyone's
well
recently,
we
had
a
community
outreach
meeting
with
residents
near
huguenot
park
and
one
of
the
brainstorming
ideas
that
was
presented
to
us
was
to
rename
huguenot,
which
staff
fully
supported,
since
we
do
get
inundated
from
time
to
time
with
calls
for
the
rv
park
off
picture,
so
the
community
got
together,
they
did
their
own
survey.
Independently
came
up
with
some
ideas
of
what
they
would
maybe
like
to
see
the
park
renamed
to
out
of
this
30
people,
not
one
person
disagreed
naming
the
park.
J
J
So
we
wanted
to
bring
this
to
you.
You
got
the
table
attached
to
the
memo
and
we're
just
looking
for
guidance
on
how
you
would
like
for
us
to
proceed
on
this
or
if
you
know,
we
should
rename
it
at
all.
F
Thank
you,
I'm
very
glad
to
see
this
coming
up
on
the
agenda.
I
was
doing
some
quarantine
projects
last
spring
at
the
museum
and
tried
very
hard
to
figure
out
why
this
park
is
even
named
huguenot
park.
It's
been
named
that
for
almost
at
least
90
years,
because
that
was
the
earliest
map
that
I
could
find.
F
So
I
lost
track
of
that
project,
but
the
closest
I
could
get
was
that
there
was
a
trend
in
the
last
century
to
name
things
after
the
huguenots,
and
if
you
know
your
history,
you
know
their
involvement
with
landing
in
mayport
and
helping
to
found
the
mayport
village
area,
but
really
nothing
to
do
with
tennis
centers
in
jacksonville
beach.
So
I'm
all
for
renaming
it.
It's
as
we
even
saw
again
during
orange,
crush
that
people
were
very
confused
by
the
fact
that
there
were
two.
F
I
I've
been
such
a
debbie
downer
on
this
call,
and
I
I'm
so
sad
about
that,
because
I
normally
love
talking
about
parks
and
rec,
but
I
don't
love
any
of
these
names.
Osprey
park
makes
me
think
it's
a
unf
facility
seaside
park
makes
me
think,
and
I
know
swoop,
makes
me
think
of
oceanfront
park
to
me
it's
it's
simple.
It
would
be
to
just
call
the
tennis
center,
the
jacks
beach
tennis
center.
Just
like
we
have
the
jacks
beach
golf
club
and
then
just
leave
the
park.
F
You
cannot
park
or
or
rename
the
park,
but
I
think
we
should
just
the
the
the
people
who
are
looking
at
huguenot
park
shouldn't
find
a
phone
number
in
jacksonville
beach.
If
it's
just
the
park,
so
there
should
be
the
jax
beach
tennis
center.
That
would
be
what
they
would.
You
know
what
they
would
google
and
that
would
come
up
so
because
even
all
of
these
names
that
are
suggested
don't
really
capture
the
fact
that
it's
mostly
a
tennis
center.
F
I
know
there's
playground
equipment,
there's
the
lagoon
there,
but
to
me
it
would
be
just
name
the
tennis
center,
the
tennis
center.
So
when
the
phone
rings,
people
know
that
they're
calling
the
right
place
and
we
could
do
something
with
the
park
too,
but
I
think
the
biggest
piece
of
that
would
be
just
calling
the
tennis
center
what
it
is.
E
Thank
you.
I'm
fine
with
chris's
suggestion
of
jax
beach
tennis
center,
but
the
park
I'd
like
to
decouple
us
from
the
yugino
park
in
jacksonville
and
I'm
pretty
sure
that
you
guys
as
soon
as
they
landed
here,
they
took
out
their
tennis
clubs
and
they
started
playing
some
tennis,
but
just
in
case
they
didn't.
E
I
think,
osprey
park
that
that's
the
one
that
I
voted
for
in
the
little
survey
works
because
there
are
ospreys
there
and
they
swoop
down
and
get
the
fish
as
the
city
manager
has
experienced.
It's.
I
think
it
links
us
in
well
with
the
larger
community,
yet
staying
separate,
so
go
osprey
park,
but
at
the
jax
beach
tennis
center
osprey
park
at
jacks
beach,
tennis
center.
D
I'll
second
mayor
hoffman
on
the
suggestions,
I
don't
know
how
I
feel
about
the
names
and
obviously
this
is
a
community
input.
I
know
when
it
comes
to
renaming
parks
or
city
buildings.
I
for
me
personally.
I
would
like
it
to
mean
something
as
to
why
his
after
something,
but
what
is
mean
for,
were
obviously
the
beaches
residents.
We
take
pride
in
a
lot
of
the
things.
So
if
we
are
going
to
rename
the
port,
I
would
like
it
to
mean
something
to
where
it's
the
pride
and
joy
of
the
tennis
community.
D
I
do
like
the
name
jax
beach,
tennis
center,
maybe
jb
tennis
center
as
a
to
showing
the
name
or
maybe
pablo
beach
park,
but
obviously
pablo
beach.
It's
further
down.
Yeah,
let's
help
you
thank
you.
H
Yeah,
I'm
good
with
the
jacks
beach
jacksonville
beach
tennis
center.
I
think
that's
great.
I
agree
osprey
park,
everyone's
gonna
think
unf
and
I
think
that's
a
little
misleading.
I
mean
I
personally
like
sunsets
park.
I
took
this
this
out
there
the
other
day
I
don't
know
if
y'all
can
see
it,
but
it's
the
it's
a
great
place
from
where
the
the
way
the
boardwalk
is
built.
H
It
faces
west
and
I
think,
there's
some
really
good
sunsets
in
that
area,
where
you
don't
really
think
about
seeing
sunsets
that
much
from
jacksonville
beach,
so
the
seaside
and
stuff
like
that.
I
think
that's
kind
of
misleading
because
you're
a
little
off
the
couple
blocks
off
the
beach,
but
I
like
sunsets
park,
but
I
think
it'll
draw
a
lot
of
people
to
that
area
for,
for
sunset,.
I
Just
to
keep
it
in
line
with
our
golf
course
I
like
jax
beach,
tennis
club,
it
is
jax
beach.
If
you
look
at
their
website
our
website,
it's
jax
beach,
golf
club,
so
I
do
kind
of
I
mean
the
the
difference
is
really
small,
but
it
it
has
some
synergy.
Some
similarity
which
I
think
is
important.
You
got
jb,
gc
and
jbtc,
I
think
that's
kind
of
cool
and
we
will
do
color
matching
shirts
chris,
just
throwing
that
out
there.
I
As
far
as
the
names
go,
I
wasn't
really
super
thrilled
with
any
of
them.
None
of
them
stood
out
and
said:
wow
that's
a
park
that
I
really
want
to
go
to
and
I'm
not
that
far
from
it
whoops.
I
think
we
could
possibly
do
a
little
bit
better
in
the
naming
of
the
park.
Sunset
was
like
the
best
one
and
I
was
kind
of
like
well,
it's
really
close
to
the
eastern
side
of
the
city,
not
the
western
side
of
the
city.
I
I
My
mind
may
be
changed,
but
I
kind
of
agree
that
as
much
as
we
all
love
the
to
swoop
osprey
park-
and
I
do
love
ospreys,
they're,
really
cool,
see
them
all
the
time,
but
it
just
it
makes
me
think
that,
like
unf
is
controls
the
park
and
maybe
if
they
want
to
put
a
bunch
of
sculptures
there
too,
we
can
rename
it
osprey
park,
but
I
don't
know
I
just
it
does
it
doesn't
do
much
for
me.
So
we.
J
So
when
we
got
this
list,
I
did
a
little
bit
of
research
just
to
see
if
there
were
other
osprey
parks
in
the
area
or
seaside
parks,
because
I
would
hate
to
run
into
the
same
issue
that
we're
already
having
there
is
an
osprey
cove
rv
park
in
mayport.
I
love
the
osprey
park
idea.
However,
I
think
that
may
still
be
confusing
just
for
some
people.
J
J
A
I
see
some
heads
nodding.
Would
council
like
us
to
explore
the
family
names
of
those
that
dedicated
the
land?
For
that
part.
J
I'd
be
happy
to
get
those
to
you.
There
were
three
main
families.
I
A
Sounds
like
we'll
pull
up
some
of
that
information
and
get
it
to
council
for
further
consideration.
J
Well,
I
can
do
some
further
research
and
again
I
can
send
those
to
you.
There
were
some
other
names
that
that
area
went
by
prior
to
he
not
lagoon
as
well.
I
saw
atlantic
campgrounds
on
there,
which
I
thought
was
kind
of
cool
milami
creek,
which
I
don't
know
what
that
name
is
from,
but
again
maybe
another
option
so.
E
C
I
have
to
agree
with
the
councilman
meza
that
I
would
like,
if
we're
going
to
do
a
name
other
than
well.
I
like
the
jacksonville
beach,
tennis,
club
or
tennis
center.
I
definitely
like
that
for
that
part,
but
for
the
park.
If
we're
going
to
do
a
name,
I
would
like
for
it
to
mean
something.
I
agree,
the
the
names
that
were
presented
didn't
do
anything
for
me
at
all
sorry
georgette.
I
know
you
like
the
osprey
name,
but
but
yeah.
C
I
think
that
the
the
association
with
unf
could
make
it
confusing,
and
but
I
do
like
the
idea
of
looking
at
the
names
of
the
people
who
donated
the
property,
because
I
think
that
that
could
be
meaningful
and
I
would
be
open
to-
and
I
know
everybody's
gonna
cringe,
but
I
mean
this
is
a
city
park.
Even
though
it's
right
there,
you
know
the
the
the
neighbors
had
some
input
into
it.
Why
don't?
Why
aren't
we
asking
some
of
our
other
citizens
to
provide
input
on
what
they
think
a
good
name
would
be?
C
If
we
don't
go
in
the
direction
of
the
name
of
somebody
who
donated
the
property,
could
we
make
it
fun?
Could
we
do
something
fun
with
it?
I
don't
know
but,
but
to
just
my
thinking
is
to
just
have
the
names
proposed
by
you
know
some
of
the
people
who
just
live
in
the
area.
We
might
could
get
some
other
really
good
ideas.
If
we
were
to
expand
it.
C
I
Mike
this
is
something
I
thought
about
kind
of
unrelated
to
this,
but
while
we're
talking
about
renaming
a
park,
it
goes
hand
in
hand,
have
we
or
is
it?
I
Have
we
ever
done,
or
is
it
even
possible
to
use
it
as
a
capital
campaign
to
raise
funds
like,
I
don't
want
to
say,
sell
the
name
of
the
park
and
I'm
not
talking
maybe
about
this
park
specifically,
but
is
that
something
that
we've
ever
considered?
I
If
somebody
wants
to
you
know,
donate
something
I
mean
we're
talking
about
the
people
who
donated
the
land
talking
about
you
know
people
that
in
the
2020s
who
are
looking
to
memorialize
their
life
in
a
specific
way
of
jax
beach,
we've
got
the
street
sign
program,
I'm
just
saying:
if
there's
anything
on
the
parks
where
it
could
be
a
possible
income
of
if
we're
looking
to
rename
this
park,
maybe
it's
not
the
official
name,
but
it's
a
sub
name.
I
don't
know
if
that's
ever
been
brought
up.
A
Typically,
communities
that
have
done
that
have
done
that
for
revenue
generating
venues,
whether
it
is
a
amphitheater,
a
concert
hall
or
a
sports,
complex
they've,
entered
into
agreements
for
the
equivalent
of
multi-year
sponsorships
and
sold
the
rights
to
put
a
name
on
it
associated
with
the
company.
There
are
pros
and
cons
to
doing
that
once
the
once.
The
name
is
up
you're
obligated
to
keep
it
up
there
for
the
term
of
the
contract,
regardless
of
a
change
in
counsel
and
a
desire
to
move
away
towards
a
different
name.
A
With
this
being
a
smaller
park
and
not
necessarily
one
that
generates
revenue,
it
may
be
difficult
to
get
people
who
would
want
to
put
a
family
name
on
there
and
again,
then
you'd
have
to
create
criteria
for
what
names
you
would
accept
and
which
names
you
would
not
accept,
and
the
reasons
why
so
that
could
create
some
issues
as
well,
but
that.
I
F
I
just
I'm
sure,
as
sandy
was
saying
it
in
talking
about
involvement
and
ideas
from
the
community.
We
all
remember
bodie
mcboat
face,
so
I
would
just
say
we
should
just
be
real
careful
with
that
and
then,
if
we
and
it
sounds
like
everybody's
in
agreement-
that
we
just
go
ahead
and
change
the
name
of
the
tennis
center
to
jacks
beach,
tennis,
center
or
tennis
club,
whatever
it
is,
and
that
should
help
the
phone
ringing
problem
right
away
because
the
park
won't
have
a
phone.
F
So
if
we
kind
of
think
about
them
as
two
separate
entities,
there's
the
tennis
center
and
there's
the
park.
So
I
do
agree,
I'm
I'm
good
to
change
that
name,
but
whatever
happens
there.
If,
as
soon
as
we
change
the
name
of
the
tennis
center,
the
phone
will
stop
ringing
for
huguenot
park
other
than
old
listings
somewhere,
so
that
should
that
should
help
right
away.
So
I
think
it
sounds.
J
F
F
H
You
know
I
I
agree
with
chet
just
to
be
consistent.
I,
like
tennis
club,
better
than
tennis
center.
I
just
for
consistency's
sake
and
then
my
last
pitch
for
the
for
the
name
sunset
is.
It
did
come
in
very
high
as
a
lot
of
people's
number
two,
but
you
know
when
naming
it
after
a
person
or
something
else,
I'd
like
to
name
it
after
something
that
would
actually
draw
people
to
the
park,
and
I
think
you
know
sunsets
would
do
that.
I
mean,
I
think
it
would.
H
E
I
don't
want
to
beat
a
dead
osprey,
but
apparently
nobody
likes
ospreys
the
and
I
understand
where
mr
nichols
is
going
with
attracting
people,
but
we
also
want
to
remember
that
this
is
a
neighborhood
park.
This
is
a
park
that
people
who
live
right
there
use
all
the
time,
and
so
I
think
that
their
selection
of
a
name
should
have
greater
weight
than
others,
selection
of
the
name.
With
regard
to
center
versus
club.
E
The
way
I
see
it
does
the
tennis
center.
Can
you
become
a
member
of
it?
E
D
Just
to
comment
on
vice
mayor
cory
nichols
and
georgette
dumont
the
sunset
park.
After
seeing
the
picture,
I
could
see
why,
if
we
were
even
considered
sun
part,
I
can
see
why
that
picture
looks
amazing,
but
it
probably
looked
better
if
you
take
it
from
an
android
phone.
D
Sorry
bias
here
and
second,
I
could
see
georgetown's
point
as
it
is
a
neighborhood
park.
I
can
see
why.
So
those
are
just
my
comments,
but
either
way
we
name
it
here
in
a
park.
It's
still,
we
should
change
it
other
than
that
go
osprey.
H
And
I
don't
think
anybody
here
is
anti-osprey
and
I
mean
it's
really
not
a
bad
name,
because
while
I
was
out
there
taking
that
picture,
I
did
spend
probably
you
know
10
minutes
following
an
osprey
around
watching
him
fly,
seeing
if
he
was
going
to
dive
and
get
and
get
stuff
too.
So
you
know
if
we
could
figure
out
a
way
to
to
name
it.
You
know
osprey
view
park
or
you
know
some
something
that
we
could
kind
of
tweak
the
name
a
little
bit.
So
people
know.
H
You
know
I
mean
I,
I
think,
there's
other
options
I
mean
there.
There
are
all
there's
always
an
ostrich
flying
around
that
park,
which
I
mean,
I
think
it's
pretty
cool
too.
So
I
don't
know
osprey
sunset
park
might
not
be
bad
either,
but
here
we
go
I'll
that
ground.
G
A
A
So
I
I
think,
there's
definitely
a
consensus
on
the
tennis
center,
I'm
not
sure,
there's
a
consensus
on
the
naming
for
the
park
itself
is
this.
Something
council
would
like
to
think
about
from
the
name
perspective
a
little
more
for
the
park
itself,
but
we
can
go
ahead
and
make
an
adjustment
to
the
actual
tennis
center
name
at
this
time.
C
I
I'd
like
to
hear
the
names
too
that
molly
you
know
can
give
us,
because
you
know
gonzales
park
is
named
gonzales
park
because
gonzalez
family
donated
that
property
to
to
be
the
park,
so
I
mean,
I
think
it's
very.
I
think
it's
it's
very
appropriate
if
we
were
to
consider
a
name
from
one
of
the
families
who
donated
the
parkland,
so
I
definitely
would
like
to
hear
what
molly
can
share
on
that
with
that
regard,.
A
We'll
get
you
some
of
that
information
for
you
to
consider
over
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
We'll
bring
this
item
back
with
regards
to
the
park.
That'll
also
give
you
the
council
a
little
bit
more
time
to
think
about
it
and
then
we'll
have
a
revisit
on
the
actual
parking
lot.
E
A
A
And
now
we're
going
to
kick
it
over
to
heather
ireland
for
the
last
item
of
the
night,
with
regards
to
proposed
changes
to
outdoor
restaurant
areas
and
alcohol
license
requirements,
whether
the
floor
of
yours.
K
Thank
you
mike
and
good
evening
again,
mayor
and
council,
the
topic
of
outdoor
seating
has
come
up
a
couple
times
in
the
last
few
months
and
back
in
june
you,
you
asked
to
discuss
it
a
little
further
in
terms
of
potentially
increasing
the
rate
of
the
ratio
that
restaurants
could
get
for
outdoor
seating.
Currently,
it's
25
percent-
and
you
know
a
couple
numbers
have
been
tossed
around
50
percent
seems
to
be
common,
that
I've
heard
of
the
ratio
for
outdoor
seating
based
on
the
size
of
the
indoor
seating.
K
Additionally,
it's
been
discussed
whether
or
not
to
count
outdoor
seating
for
a
restaurant
into
their
150
seats
so
that
they
can
qualify
for
a
for
cop,
which
is
a
full
restaurant
with
liquor
license.
So
we
didn't
want
to
just
start
putting
together.
You
know
proposed
changes
to
the
code.
We
really
wanted
to
hear
your
input
on
which
direction
that
you
wanted
to
go
so
I've
kind
of
proposed
some
more
questions
or
options
for
you
in
terms
of
how
you
wanted
us
to
maybe
address
this.
K
If,
if
you
wanted
to
do
that
or
consider
doing
it
for
the
whole
city
versus
maybe
just
the
central
business
district,
so
we
really
more
had
a
lot
of
questions
for
you
on
how
to
proceed
forward
so
that
we
could
start
drafting
some
amendments
to
the
land
development
code.
H
You
first
I
I
got
a.
We
got
an
email
from
a
local
business
owner
today
greg
and
he
did
put
forth
that
the
city
of
saint
augustine,
as
well
as
neptune
beach,
does
not
have
any
percentage
requirement
and
if
we're
going
to
start
for
out
for
outdoor
seating,
I
mean
I.
I
don't
think
that
I'm
I'm
fine
with
not
having
any
at
all
as
a
percentage,
especially
if
we're
going
to
go
to
you
know,
try
to
try
to
modify
the
total
number
of
seats
necessary
in
the
future.
H
I
mean,
I
think,
small
businesses,
small
restaurants.
If
they
can
have
outdoor
seating,
you
know
hey
the
more
the
merrier.
I
think
the
percentage
is
gonna
might
end
up,
causing
some
roadblocks
for
smaller
restaurants
that
we
didn't
anticipate
having.
I
guess
what
was
one
that
I
brought
up
like
harry's
in
st
augustine,
that
really
I'm
just
a
big
proponent
of
outdoor
of
outdoor
seating
as
much
as
possible.
Granted,
typically,
those
are
dog
friendly
as
well
the,
and
I
am
very
much
I.
H
I
do
agree
that
that
whatever
outside
seating
that
that
should
be
included
in
the
in
the
srx
proposal,
if
you're
seating,
people
and
and
serving
meals,
I
think
that
we
need
to
that
all
the
seating
should
be
included
in
that.
E
So
there
are
two
issues
that
we're
looking
at
here:
one
is
the
srx
license
and
what
seating's
allowable
and
two
is
the
land
development
code
for
us
and
allowing
outdoor
seating
for
our
businesses
so
with
the
first
one.
I
think
it
should
be
the
total
number
of
seating
that
is
available
for
the
srx
license.
E
I'm
you
know,
I'm
I'm
fine
with
that.
I
know
our
code
has
three
different
distinctions
as
to
restaurant
area,
there's
the
covered,
there's
outdoor
and
then
there's
indoor,
so
we
definitely
need
to
get
rid
of
the
cover.
E
The
coverage
should
be
swap
swooped
since
we're
on
the
osprey
theme
tonight,
swooped
into
the
indoor,
but
with
regard
to
outdoor
seating,
I
am
not
opposed
to
not
having
right
not
having
as
strict
a
code
on
outdoor
seating
with
regard
to
restaurants,
and
I
think,
with
regard
to
bars,
that's
a
different
we're
talking
about
a
different
clientele.
We're
talking
about
a
different
noise
decibel
all
of
that.
So
I
think
we
have
to
be
really
surgical
in
how
we
want
to
approach
this.
E
Right,
we
all
love
to
eat
outdoors
and
especially
right
now
we
all
really
love
to
eat
outdoors.
We
feel
safer
and
I
think
that
restaurants
that
do
offer
outdoor
seating
do
enjoy
a
a
better
ambiance
to
be
able
to
attract
clientele.
E
That
said,
just
because
we
allow
for
restaurants-
and
I'm
really
being
specific
here,
restaurants
to
have
you
know-
75
100
of
outdoor
seating
in
comparison
to
the
indoor
seating,
there
should
be
some
criteria
as
to
how
that
outdoor
seating
is
designed.
So
you
want
to
make
sure
that
you
have
like
greenery
and
things
that
would
help
to
block
off
some
of
the
outdoor
traffic.
E
We
really
need
to
be
very
careful
as
to
how
any
changes
in
the
ldc
are
worded
to
make
sure
that
it's
it
doesn't
go
against
us
to
what
brought
it
there
in
the
first
place.
I
I
think
is
the
best
way
to
put
it.
There
is
a
reason
why
just
like
there
is
a
reason
why
every
line
on
my
syllabus
is
in
there,
because
there
was
an
incident
that
was
far
more
complicated
than
it
should
have
been.
E
Has
propelled
forth
that
that
statement
in
a
syllabus
everything
that's
in
the
ldc,
especially
when
we
start
looking
at
these
odd
things.
There
was
a
reason
or
an
incident
that
put
this
on
the
agenda
of
the
council
to
actually
pass
this
type
of
a
ordinance,
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
keep
that
in
mind.
So
we
don't
have
unintended
consequences,
even
though
our
intentions
are
good.
We
want
restaurants,
we
want
vibrant
downtown,
we
want
people
to
be
able
to
enjoy
outdoors.
E
We
want
dogs
to
be
able
to
go
there
with
the
little
doggy
water
bowls
and
provided
by
the
restaurant
and
enjoy
you
know
dinner
with
the
human,
but
we
also
want
to
dissuade
the
situations
that
put
it
there
in
the
first
place,.
H
And
just
to
just
complete
what
georgette,
I
think
that
you
were
saying
I
like
the
talking
about
the
planning
and
stuff,
but
a
lot
of
it
is
also
the
the
tables
and
not
being
able
to
move
those
tables
to
addre,
to
bring
in
other
crowds
and
make
it
more
of
a
bar
scene
that
the
tables,
I
think,
was
a
big
was.
It
was
a
big
way
to
keep
that
challenge
down.
D
Probably
gonna
be
raising
my
hands
a
lot,
because
I
have
a
lot
of
input
in
this
first
concern
that
I
have
is
making
sure.
Obviously
we
have
to
take
everyone's
input,
making
sure
we
don't
create
a
loophole.
D
Obviously,
right
now
we
have
the
rhinos
to
turn
into
bars
and
you
know
don't
operate
as
restaurants.
So
that's
just
my
main
concern
that
if
we
do
decide
to
remove
the
percentage
of
outdoor
city
that
there's
not
a
loophole
created,
but
councilmember
kornick
would
just
brought
it
up
about.
You
know
these
tables
that
are
outside
make
sure
they're
not
removed,
and
then
the
place
turns
into
a
bar.
D
Obviously
they
were
told
they
had
to
remove
them,
but
that's
a
perfect
example
of
some
of
the
outdoor
seating
that
will
benefit
the
restaurant
and
I
think
I
would
greatly
appreciate
as
to
why
it
took
forever
to
enforce
that
code.
But
I
know
with
the
restaurant
the
sushi
restaurant
going
up
across
the
street
from
the
pier.
D
I
If
you
do
jay,
you
might
get
a
little
jealous,
so
we
might
have
to
start
talking
about
dolphins
a
few
more
times,
but
going
back
to
the
the
srx.
I
I
I
100
think
that
the
outdoor
seating
should
be
allowed
to
compute
into
that.
I
think
that
either
whether
the
seating
is
indoors
or
outdoors,
they
still
have
to
have
150
seats
to
get
the
restaurant
license.
So
and
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
I
did
I
did
this
research,
and
this
is
what
I
found
online
and
that's
not
always
correct,
but
the
four
cops
srx
license
does
say
that
they
have
to
have
100.
I
You
have
to
have
be
permitted
for
at
least
150
seats,
whether
they're
inside
or
outside.
So
I
think,
if
you
remove
those
outdoor
seats
to,
I
believe
it
was
councilmember
nichols
point
you
don't
qualify
with
the
150
seats,
so
I
think
councilmember
maze's
point
about
protecting.
I
You
know
the
rhino
establishments
there's
a
couple
good
protections
in
there
by
also
selling
more
food
than
alcohol
there's
couple
so
whether
you
know
if
they
were
to
take
up
those
50
or
75
or
100
seats
outside
they
could
be
in
breach
and
they
could
lose
their
license
from
the
state.
I
So
I
think
we
have
some
pretty
good
reasons
there
that
we
can
enforce
and
make
sure
that
we're
holding
these
businesses
accountable,
especially
if
we
do
allow
more
outdoor
seating,
I'm
all
for
it,
the
you
know
not
to
bring
in
outside
states,
but
the
news
out
of
new
york
about
where
you
have
to
show
that
you're
vaccinated
to
eat
inside
is
is
like,
oh
wow.
If
that
you
know
very
doubtful
that
that
comes
to
florida,
but
if
you
you
know,
I
just
them
like
wow.
I
If
you
go
to
new
york
and
you're
with
somebody
who's
unvaccinated,
they
can't
go
in
the
restaurant.
Now
I
have
to
have
outdoor
seating.
So
I
think
outdoor
seating
is
so
much
more
prevalent
and
it's
such
a
big
thing
and
we
live
in
florida,
where
it's
beautiful
nine
months
out
of
the
year,
mostly
that
I
would
prefer
to
eat
outside
nine
out
of
ten
times.
I
If
I
could
at
a
good
restaurant
as
long
as
it's
not
blazing
hot,
and
so
I
you
know,
I
I
think
that
50
is
is
a
great
minimum
threshold,
but
I
like
seeing
you
know,
no
restriction
and
we
just
be
very
clear-cut,
with
our
planning
and
ldc
on
on
what
it
can
have
zero
restriction
outside,
but
I
think
just
putting
an
arbitrary
number.
I
mean
it
just
went
up
to
25
and
that's
crazy
to
me
because
we
live
in
florida.
It's
beautiful
outside
I
love
to
be
outside.
I
Oh,
I
liked
the
ordinance
from
2017
the
ordinance
2017
8093
I'd
like
to
see
a
little
bit
more
on
that
or
get
a
little
bit
more
information
on
that.
I
like
it
from
a
5
000
feet,
foot
view,
but
all
I
have
is
the
little
brief
tidbit
in
here,
so
either
get
backstory
now
or
later
on
that
to
influence
my
decision
making.
So
I
have
a
little
bit
more
information
would
be
great.
H
So
a
couple
different
things
for
the
chat
for
the
150
seat
minimum.
There
are
ways
that
that
can
be
modified,
they've
done
it
in
downtown,
jacksonville
and
avondale.
It's
got
to
go
through
the
state
legislature.
H
Mr
meza,
you
know
you
brought
up
rhinos
and
I
think,
over
the
last
couple
years,
we've
been
very
fortunate
to
have
removed
all,
if
not
all,
if
most,
if
not
all
of
them
from
our
downtown
area,
the
ones
that
have
always
had
been
the
problems
years
ago.
I
think
those
are
all
gone
at
this
time.
I
can't
think
of
one
particular
one
that
is
that
I
would
say,
fall
into
the
the
restaurant
in
name
only
category
right
now
and
last.
H
I
think
you
know
we
really
want
to
have
restaurants,
and
I
think,
and
I'm
asking
from
a
legal
standpoint:
can
we
modify
ours
to
say?
H
I
don't
know
how
we
could
we
could
write
that
in,
but
I
think
that
would
that
could
possibly
curtail
some
of
the
challenges
that
we
were
looking
at,
but
just
an
idea.
D
Just
to
chime
in
real
quick,
just
chime
in
real
quick
on
your
comment,
corey
there's
two.
I
know
one
for
sure
that
are
rhinos.
I
won't
name
them
here,
but
there
really
hasn't
been
any
large
problems
like
in
the
past,
but
you
are
correct.
Some
of
the
rhinos
are
leaving,
but
I
know.
C
So
I
agree
with
the
things
that
have
been
said
about
the
rhinos.
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that,
whatever
we
do
with
this,
that
we
are
not
creating
any
loopholes
or
we're
opening
any
introducing
any
unintended
consequences
that
would
somehow
support
the
problem
that
we've
had
in
the
past.
Like
mrs
dumont
said,
and
a
lot
of
that
being
with
rhinos
one
of
the
questions
I
and
I
I
love
outside
dining,
and
I
think
I
think
we
need
to.
K
C
C
Okay,
all
right
and
personally
I
know
this
was
a
question
that
was
asked,
and
I
don't
know
if
anybody
has
spoken
to
it,
but
I
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
want
to
just
see
this
in
the
central
business
district.
I
would
want
to
see
whatever
we
do
to
be
consistent
across
the
city.
I
don't
think
it
would
be
right
to
only
do
you
know
only
allow
more
outside
dining
in
one
area
and
not
allow
it
somewhere
else.
So
and
again,
I
just
want
to
reiterate
whatever
we
do.
C
I
want
us
to
be
very,
very
careful
that
we
are
not
introducing
unintended
consequences,
so
I'm
I'm
on
the
same
page
with
ms
dumont
as
far
as
that
goes
and
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
we're
supporting
the
good
things
and
and
not
encouraging
the
bad
things
that
we
don't
want
to
have.
D
F
I've
heard
speculation
that
it
was
because
of
a
certain
biker
bar
that
might
have
been
here
in
the
80s
and
90s,
but
I
can't
say
that
for
sure
it
predates
me,
but
the
2017
kind
of
compromise
that
we
did.
I
was
a
part
of
obviously.
F
F
H
A
I'm
not
seeing
any
other
hands
raised
heather.
Do
you
think
you
have
enough
direction
at
this
point
and
feedback
from
council
to
start
moving
forward
with
a
draft
of
something.
D
One
quick
question
for
miss
heather.
I
know
I'm
so
many
have
been
in
communication
with
the
sushi
restaurant.
That's
going
next
lunches
have
other
restaurant
bar
owners
been
in
contact
with
you,
as
in
relation
to
what
we're
talking.
A
A
Well,
that
concludes
the
agenda
items
for
presentation
to
counsel.
Does
anyone
want
to
do
a
committee
report
out.
D
I
feel
like
I've
raised
my
hands
a
lot
today.
Is
it
so
I've
been
thinking
about
all
the
things
that
we've
been
doing
the
past
couple
weeks
couple
months
and
very
delighted
on
the
briefing
topics
that
we
have
today
with
the
parks?
D
Obviously
I
ran
because
I
love
this
community
very
much
and
I
wanted
to
see
it
succeed
in
every
aspect
on
the
services,
the
quality
of
life
that
we
provide.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
resolution
or
something
we
can
do
about
setting
the
standard
pretty
high,
as
in
this
community
will
always
be
working
on
improvements.
I
don't
know
something
if
you
could
help
me
out
here,
like
road
maintenance
that
the
city
of
jacksonville
beach
will
have
85
percent
of
the
roads.
D
Up
to
date,
parts
will
be
up,
you
know
85
percent
or
you
guys
get
what
I'm
saying,
I'm
trying
to
express
or
communicate
as
well,
but
I'm
having
problems,
because
it's
I'm
thinking
so
much
right
away.
But
mike
do
you
see
where
I'm
going
with
this.
A
I
can
talk
to
you
more
about
that,
but
you
know
to
give
you
the
example
with
the
roadways
we'll
talk
about
a
pci
pavement
condition
index
and
we
will
strive
that
strive
for
an
index
across
the
city
to
be
maintained
as
a
minimum
level
of
standard
for
roads
and
that
might
be
70
75
78,
whatever
it
might
be,
but
then
the
goal
will
be
never
go
below
that
limit.
D
And
this
is
just
across
the
board
of
the
entire
city,
not
just
roads,
but
every
department
street
signs,
the
just
the
quality
of
life
in
itself.
Obviously
we
can
have
the
the
urban
trail,
but
it's
something
that
I've
been
thinking
and
hopefully
I
could
sit
down
and
write
these
notes,
which
I
always
tend
to
forget
once
I'm
trying
to
speak.
But
yes,
that's
just
something
that
maybe
we
could
talk
about
in
the
future.
H
E
E
So
we
have
to
be
careful
as
to
how
set
we
want
to
be
on
a
quality
on
a
quality
level,
because
at
times
that
may
include
raising
taxes
depending
on
how
the
economy
is
going,
property
prices
and
all
that.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
looking
at
the
whole
picture
here
of
intake
and
output,
just
to
make
sure
we
keep
the
picture
clear.