►
From YouTube: City Council Briefing (1/10/2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
B
D
To
go.
Thank
you
jacob
good
evening,
mayor
and
council.
This
is
the
january
10
2022
council
briefing.
We
have
four
items
for
presentation
on
our
agenda
tonight,
the
first
one
being
a
presentation
from
the
american
flood
coalition,
something
that
was
requested
by
our
city
council
a
couple
of
months
ago.
D
We
do
have
several
representatives
from
that
organization
on
the
zoo
call
with
us
tonight
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
anna
baker
or
anna
baker
with
american
flood
coalition,
and
she
will
lead
us
through
their
presentation
and
any
questions
that
the
council
might
have.
So
with
that
anna
the
floor
is
yours.
E
Excellent,
thank
you
so
much.
Yes,
there
are
four
of
us
from
the
american
flood
coalition.
Speaking
with
you
today,
three
from
the
still
somewhat
snowy
washington,
d.c
area
and
one
from
florida,
I'm
the
senior
outreach
director
for
afc.
E
I
will
pass
it
to
kate,
our
florida
director
just
to
briefly
introduce
herself
and
then
rolando
and
then
liz
who
will
be
starting
our
briefing
so
kate
I'll
pass
it
over
to
you.
Thank
you.
Anna
hi.
A
E
F
Wonderful,
thank
you,
kate,
and
thank
you
all.
I
hope
you
can
see
my
screen
with
the
slides
if
I
can
get
a
thumbs
up
from
someone
we're
good
to
go
on
the
slides
excellent.
F
So
my
name
is
liz
kassen
and
I'm
a
senior
outreach
associate
with
the
american
flood
coalition,
primarily
focusing
on
outreach
efforts
and
supporting
our
work
in
texas
and
in
florida
and
as
kate
said
and
as
anna
said,
really
excited
to
be
with
you
all
this
evening
to
share
a
little
bit
more
about
the
american
flood
coalition
and
some
of
our
work
in
florida.
F
So
I
will
just
jump
right
in
and
the
american
flood
coalition.
We
are
a
national,
non-partisan,
nonprofit
that
is
dedicated
to
advocating
and
advancing
advancing
national
solutions
to
address
flooding
and
sea
level
rise.
You'll
see
here.
Our
membership
consists
of
elected
officials
at
the
local
county
and
state
levels,
cities
and
county.
F
We
recognize
members
of
congress
as
federal
champions
and
we
also
have
businesses,
civic
groups,
military
groups
and
academic
institutions
as
part
of
our
coalition's
membership,
and
we
across
the
country
we
have
over
280
members
spanning
21
states,
with
a
good
majority
of
our
members
coming
from
the
state
of
florida
and
you'll,
see
where
most
of
our
members
are
concentrated
on
the
left-hand
side
of
this
slide,
with
most
of
our
membership,
of
course,
in
florida,
and
then
in
states
like
texas,
both
north
and
south
carolina's,
virginia
and
in
new
york,
and
on
the
the
right
hand,
side
you'll
see
a
more
specific
breakdown
of
where
our
membership
in
florida
falls
into
which
kind
of
category
and
the
types
of
members
that
we
have.
F
So
we
recognize
11
federal
champions
across
the
state
for
their
their
support
and
engagement
on
addressing
flooding
and
sea
level
rise
at
the
federal
level.
We
also
have
over
60
cities
and
counties
that
are
members
of
the
coalition
21
elected
officials,
18
business
groups,
one
military
group
and
two
civic
organizations
and
membership
with
the
american
flood
coalition
is
free
and
it's
relatively
easy
to
join
for
individual
elected
officials.
That
choose
to
become
members
of
the
coalition.
F
It's
a
very
simple!
Yes,
I'd
like
to
be
a
member
of
the
coalition
and
for
cities
and
counties
and
other
municipal
entities
that
are
interested
in
joining
the
coalition.
They
can
really
do
so
in
a
number
of
different
ways.
Cities
and
counties
can
join
either
by
an
executive
decision.
F
They
can
join
by
a
voice
vote
during
a
council
meeting
or
a
commission
meeting
or
by
passing
a
resolution
that
says
that
they
would
like
to
join
the
coalition
and
for
cities
that
choose
to
pass
a
resolution.
We
have
a
generic
draft
resolution
and
other
informational
materials
about
the
coalition.
F
This
doesn't
capture
all
of
our
members
in
the
region,
but
this
is
a
really
good
example
of
some
of
the
elected
officials
and
cities
and
towns
that
have
joined
the
coalition,
and
then
we
also
have
three
federal
champions
from
the
region
again
really
kind
of
reflecting
that
the
bipartisan
nature
of
our
work
and
to
to
give
a
little
bit
more
context
and
some
concrete
examples
of
some
of
the
work
that
the
flight
coalition
has
done
in
the
area.
I
will
pass
it
over
to
anna,
so
anna
for.
E
Yours
thanks
liz
yeah,
so
to
give
a
picture
of
our
recent
engagements
with
folks
from
your
region.
I
just
would
love
to
give
a
short
list,
so
we
joined
a
local
beaches
watch
meeting
in
september.
This
past
fall
virtually
and
we're
really
pleased
to
speak
with
with
that
group
with
council
member
golding
as
part
of
that
group,
or
as
a
participant
in
that
discussion
as
well.
We
talked
about
local
resilience,
examples
and
actions
and
to
participate
in
a
really
lively
discussion
with
them
over
the
past
year
or
so.
E
So
those
are
just
a
few
examples
and
we're
so
again
just
pleased
to
be
connecting
with
you
all
today
and
to
be
sharing
more
information
about
the
engagement
we've
had
thus
far
and
and
to
talk
about
ways.
We
can
engage
further
great.
F
Thank
you
so
much
anna
and,
like
we
said
you
know,
the
american
flood
coalition's
mission
is
really
laser,
focused
on
flooding
and
sea
level
rise,
and
we
look
to
proactively
address
the
growing
threat
of
stronger
storms
and
higher
seas
and
more
frequent
flooding
by
advocating
for
smarter
planning
and
investments,
to
help
keep
our
communities
safe
to
help
protect
our
local
economies
and
ensure
that
our
military
installations
are
able
to
be
ready
and
deployed
at
365
days
a
year,
which
kind
of
leads
me
into
our
big
four
policy
pillars
that
really
kind
of
help
guide
our
engagement
at
the
local
county,
state
and
federal
level.
F
F
We
also
look
at
ways
to
support
communities
and
proactively
plan
to
help
keep
our
communities
safe
in
the
face
of
flooding
events,
and
then
we
also
look
at
ways
that
communities
can
can
rebuild
and
make
sure
that
they
are
protected
from
future
flood
events
and
then
the
last
one
again
I
just
I
mentioned
is
making
sure
that
our
military
installations
have
the
tools
necessary
to
make
sure
that
they
are
ready
to
be
deployed
365
days
a
year,
and
so,
like
I
said
earlier,
membership
with
the
american
flood
coalition
is
free
and
it's
not
legally
binding
and
we
are
completely
funded
through
institutional
and
philanthropic
donors,
which
does
allow
us
to
not
charge
a
membership
fee,
and
we
work
with
our
members
in
a
number
of
different
ways.
F
F
We've
also
supported
a
number
of
local
resilience:
pilots,
some
in
florida
and
then
others
in
north
carolina
and
virginia.
F
We
also
provide
a
platform
for
advocacy
and
education
at
the
federal
level
really
helping
to
amplify
and
raise
the
importance
of
these
issues
again.
We
also
provide
different
tools
for
communicating
about
flood
impacts
in
a
particular
community
being
able
to
support
our
local
members,
and
you
know
their
communities
flood
risk
and
you
know
supporting
them
through.
F
You
know,
data
points
or
talking
points,
and,
lastly,
we
develop
educational
guides
and
resources
for
our
members
to
help
understand
the
more
complex
elements
of
flooding
and
sea
level
rise
and
help
them
understand
what
strategies
they
might
be
able
to
implement
in
their
communities,
and
that
leads
me
to
I'll
just
touch
on
two
of
our
resources,
very
briefly
that
that
might
be
of
interest.
The
first
is
our
adaptation
for
all
guide,
which
we
developed
in
concert
with
the
embassy
of
the
netherlands,
and
this
outlines
a
number
of
different
resilience.
F
Strategies
for
communities
that
are
looking
to
to
tackle
flooding
and
sea
level
rise
in
their
community
and
the
the
guide
looks
at
a
number
of
different
approaches
and
really
breaks
it
down
by
cost
and
benefit,
and
a
number
of
other
considerations
to
help
leaders
identify
which
resilience
strategy
would
be
best
suited
for
their
community
and
then
the
second
resource
I'll
touch
on
is
our
flood
funding
finder,
and
this
is
an
interactive
tool
on
our
website
that
helps
folks
navigate
the
various
different
federal
grant
opportunities
and
really
focus
in
based
on
a
number
of
filters
and
characteristics
which
federal
grant
would
be
best
suited
for
a
flooding
project.
F
F
We
are
happy
to
field
any
questions
right
now
and
of
course,
you
know,
please
don't
hesitate
to
reach
out
to
us
over
email
if
there
are
any
lingering
questions
after
our
presentation,
but
I
will
open
it
up
to
any
questions
or
kate
or
anna.
If
there's
anything
else
that
you
would
like
to
jump
in
with.
D
You
liz
and
thank
you
anna
waiting
to
see
if
any
of
our
council
members
have
questions
if
they're
going
to
raise
their
hands
on
zoom.
G
I
want
to
be
a
member
can.
Can
I
join.
G
H
I
E
Yes,
one
of
the
resources
we're
happy
to
pass
along.
We
have
a
dual
disaster
guide
that
focuses
on
you
know.
We
developed
this
right
as
coveted.
First
emerged
and
communities
were
facing
the
dual
challenge
of
dealing
with
the
pandemic
and
with
post
flooding
response
efforts
simultaneously,
so
you're
correct.
E
We
do
engage
mostly
in
the
pre-disaster
planning
side
of
things,
but
we
certainly
do
touch
the
the
post-flood
response
and
recovery
side
as
well
and-
and
we
we're
very
familiar-
and
we
hear
from
a
lot
of
our
local
partners
and
members,
how
much
of
an
integrated
cycle
that
really
becomes
where
some
of
the
funding
that's
invested
during
a
flood
recovery
effort
can
lead
to
pre-disaster
adaptation
that
can
improve
resilience
over
the
long
run
as
well.
So.
H
Yeah
one
thing
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on:
I
I
actually
was
able
to
attend
that
meeting.
That
anna
was
talking
about
that
was
held
in
neptune
beach.
It
was
off
off
the
icw.
There
was
there's
some
residents
that
are
actually
their
homes
are
on
shadow
lane,
which
is
over
there
off
of
seagate
and
they're,
seeing
rising
water
levels
in
their
area,
and
I
don't
know
if
any
of
you
have
spoken
to
any
citizens,
but
over
off
of
lakeside
drive
and
that
area.
H
I've
had
several
citizens
contact
me
about
the
rising
water
levels
that
they're
seeing.
So
this
is
definitely
something
that's
being
seen
by
our
citizens,
and
I
just
think
it
would
be
good
for
us
to
proactively
consider
a
membership
in
this
organization
so
that
we
can
access
the
resources
that
they
have,
but
also
hopefully,
hopefully
benefit
from.
J
Thank
you.
I
concur
with
what
sandy
said.
I
hear
from
people
in
the
sanctuary
a
lot
about
flooding
and
I
have
for
years,
and
so
this
is
an
issue
for
people
on
specifically
on
the
west
side
of
the
island
here.
J
So
I
would
like
to
see
if
we
have
agreement
on
council
for
the
city
to
look
at
developing
a
resolution
and
become
a
member
of
the
flood
association,
I
think
it's
it's
good
for
the
city,
it's
good
for
a
lot
of
the
people,
specifically
on
that
west
side
and
it
you
know
it's
one
more
feather
in
our
cap
that
we're
trying
to
be
environmentally
conscious,
which
is
part
of
the
strategic
plan.
D
Now
that
I
can
see
all
of
our
council
members
there
a
consensus
to
put
an
item
on
for
consideration
of
being
members.
H
E
K
K
So
this
quarterly
report
is
the
second
one
that
we
have
provided
to
you
guys
the
first
one
was
in
october
and
just
want
to
remind
everybody.
It's
a
really
high
level
view
of
some
of
the
topics
that
the
cra
has
been
discussing
at
their
monthly
meetings
and
at
their
workshops.
So
it's
it
is
brief.
K
I
do
encourage
all
of
you
to
tune
in
to
the
meetings
on
the
city's
youtube
channel
either
live
or
at
your
convenience,
and
please
note
that
on
the
agenda
in
the
packet
there's
a
very
detailed
multi-page
staff
report
that
taylor
does
a
fantastic
job
putting
together
it
lists
out
every
project,
that's
that's
active
or
wrapping
up
the
status
and
a
whole
bunch
of
other
stuff.
So
I
really
encourage
you
guys
to
take
a
look
at
that
staff
report.
K
It
probably
answers
a
lot
of
questions
you
might
have
so
we're
working
on
updating
that
document.
Right
now
for
the
meeting
in
january,
which
is
on
the
24th,
so
we'll
have
a
lot
more
information
to
share
on
in
that
agenda
as
to
how
the
status
of
different
projects
and
questions
that
the
cra
has
on
stuff.
K
So
just
some
highlights
of
some
things
over
the
last
couple
of
meetings,
funding
renovations
to
the
sea
walk
pavilion
was
something
that
came
up
as
a
priority
from
parks
and
rec.
They've
also
met
several
times
to
discuss
different
downtown
projects
based
on
the
priorities
that
council
has
set,
and
these
things
include.
K
But
we
hope
to
start
in
the
spring
with
getting
some
final
plans
out
there
revisiting
the
latham
plaza
and
also
the
parking
lot
adjacent
to
that
they've
discussed
things
like
periodic
closing
of
first
streets,
more
outdoor,
dining
in
the
downtown
area
and
as
far
as
the
south
end
goes
we're
actually
working
on
right
now
with
our
consultant
to
update
the
south
end
plan,
so
that
will
be
forthcoming
to
everyone
and
just
some
other
things
that
staff's
been
working
on.
K
Are
the
incentive
programs,
the
art
master
plan,
comprehensive
maintenance,
maintenance
plan
for
both
districts,
a
marketing
strategy
and
we're
also
looking
to
get
some
new
banners
for
our
street
lights
that
we
have
on
third
street.
So
again,
this
is
a
really
high
level
snapshot
of
everything.
That's
going
on
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions
that
you
might
have,
but
again
I
do
encourage
you
to
take
a
look
at
that
agenda
packet
when
it
comes
out
either
this
friday
or
first
of
next
week.
It'll,
give
you
a
lot
more
details
on
everything.
A
Hey
heather
happy
new
year
by
the
way
I
just
wanted
your
opinion.
I
keep
hearing
that
the
cra
is
continuing
to
get
bogged
down
on
small
details
and
we're
still
not
getting
the
move
forward.
A
We
discussed
two
years
ago
that
we
were
going
to
give
them
a
year
or
so
and
granted
there
was
covet
and
stuff,
but
I
just
want
your
opinion
on.
Do
you
feel
like
the
cra
is,
is
following
our
council's
direction
on
the
topics
that
they
should
be
considering,
and
is
this
moving
forward
at
a
rate
that
you're
comfortable
with
or
do
you
think
that
we
should
be
moving
forward
faster.
K
Well,
I
will
say,
and
when
you
see
the
agenda
come
out
for
the
january
meeting,
it
is,
is
jam-packed,
I'm
actually
a
little
worried
we're
going
to
go
over
our
time,
because
we
just
have
so
many
things
that
they've
asked
us
to
either
focus
on
address
or
allow
them
the
opportunity
to
discuss.
So
it
is
a
really
heavy
agenda.
K
I
do
think
that
we're
working
very
fast
there's
just
a
lot
of
things
going
on
kind
of
all
at
the
same
time,
so
I
do
think
that
good
progress
is
being
made
and
we
are
moving
forward
with
a
lot
of
these
things.
We're
getting
closer
and
closer
to.
You
know,
pushing
out
incentives
to
talk
and
talking
about
different
p3
projects
and
hopefully
very
soon,
implementing
that
art
master
plan.
We
hope
to
really
kick
that
off
in
the
spring.
K
A
Is
there
any
way
to
slow
down
that
that
waste
of
that
effort
that
I
consider
wasted
on
the
smaller
issues
that
are
driving
into
different
directions?
Is
that
can
the
the
board
leader
kind
of
you
know
put
an
end
to
like
if
we're
going
down
a
road
say:
hey
we're
going
to
stop
here.
Let's
go
back,
let's
focus
on
really
what
the
council
is
wanting
us
to
do.
K
You
know
and
again
that's
part
of
why
we
put
together
such
a
detailed
staff
report
to
try
to
cover
every
single
thing.
That's
going
on
whether
it's
a
small
maintenance
issue
or
a
big
storm
water,
drainage
project
and
every
meeting
we
seem
to
add
something
new
to
the
staff
report
and
our
goal
with
that
is
really
to
give
as
much
information
as
possible,
so
that
questions
about
those
things
will
come
up
less
and
less
at
future
meetings.
D
D
D
If
you
all
watch
those
meetings
or
you
don't
feel
that
they're
achieving
the
the
milestones
that
you've
set
out
for
them,
then
that
would
be.
That
would
be
at
your
discretion
to
make
any
changes
or
adjustments.
But
I
know
that
heather
and
her
staff,
with
with
taylor
and
some
of
our
outside
consultants,
are
working
diligently
to
try
to
keep
them
focused
and
try
to
keep
them
pointed
in
the
right
direction,
but
ultimately
it's
the
seven
of
you
to
decide
whether
or
not
that
they're
actually
meeting
your
your
directives
that
you've
given
to
them.
D
Thank
you
mike
mayor
hoffman,.
L
So,
and
I
I
agree,
I
encourage
everybody
to
watch
or
attend
those
meetings
on
occasions
and
I
will
say
they
do
have
meetings,
but
they
also
have
workshops
which
are
a
little
more
of
a
freeform
discussion.
I'm
sorry
about
the
dog,
she
was
barking
and
I
don't
know
why
and
that's
the
only
way
to
make
her
stop.
I
I
did
want
to
ask
about.
L
I
can
appreciate
the
putting
together
that
then
comprehensive
maintenance
plan
and
to
evaluate
a
full
year
of
both
of
our
districts
before
we
put
together
kind
of
that
schedule.
When
do
we?
When
do
we
hit
12
months,
and
at
what
point
do
we
expect
to
start
seeing
some
of
those
more
cosmetic
and
aesthetic
things
that
are
really
what
are
what
are
dragging
down?
A
lot
of
our
meetings
start
to
be
improved
in
terms
of
the
downtown,
in
particular
sure.
K
That's
a
great
question,
so
taylor
started
in
april
of
last
year
and
I
think
she
started
putting
that
together
in
august,
so
we're
not
quite
there,
but
I
do
think
we
have
a
good
idea
of
at
least
for
a
few
seasons.
What
we
need
to
do
when
and
the
parks
and
rec
department
has
been
fixing
the
irrigation
both
in
downtown
and
in
the
south
end
district.
So
obviously,
now
is
not
the
time
to
plant
flowers.
So
now
is
the
time
to
fix
the
irrigation.
So
we
can
plant
the
flowers.
K
So
there's
just
a
you
know:
we
don't
want
to
put
one
thing
before
the
other
plant
things
and
then
they're
going
to
die
because
the
irrigation
is
all
broken.
So
that's
part
of
that
puzzle
too
once
that
all
gets
fixed
and
we
can
plant
things
and
start
going
methodically
through
each
part
of
downtown
specifically
and
replanting
those
plants.
I
think
that
will
make
a
lot
of
improvement
as
well.
I
know
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
about
the
different
color
of
mulch,
which
we
all
know
is
you
know
something
we
don't
want.
K
We
want
to
fix
that.
Yes,
there
are
different
colors
of
mulch,
so
again
it's
a
process.
We
have
to
follow
in
a
logical
order,
so
getting
everything
fixed
with
step
number
one.
They
are
trimming
the
trees
and
trying
to
keep
things.
That's
out
that
are
out
there
now
kept
up
a
little
better
than
before.
So
there's
also
been
some
plantings
going
on
in
the
south
end
and
then
around
the
park,
we're
waiting
for
the
playground
to
get
finished
and
then
you'll
see
some
new
landscaping
going
going
up
around
there.
K
I
Happy
new
year,
heather,
just
real
quick
question,
might
clarify
my
understanding
of
that
first
bullet
point
under
staff
projects
completed
incentive
survey.
Did
you
say
that
was
coming
out
on
the
report
on
friday
or
is
that
something
in
the
future.
K
It
will
be
on
the
january
agenda,
so
there's
a
whole
separate
report
on
the
summary
of
the
survey.
We
only
got
about
a
five
percent
response
rate,
but
I
guess
I'll
take
it
and
so
there'll
be
some
detailed
information
in
the
memo
regarding
the
survey
and
then
what
our
recommendation
incentive
programs
are.
So
you'll
see
that
on
the
next
agenda.
D
Seeing
none
we'll
close
out
item
b
and
we'll
move
on
to
item
c
land
development
code
parking
standards.
So
this
item
is
a
was
a
future
briefing
topic
from
a
couple
months
ago,
where
the
council
wanted
to
have
a
discussion
about
the
parking
standards
that
we
have
related
to
townhouse
development.
D
K
Great
thank
you
mike,
so
we
provided
with
you
with
some
information
regarding
our
current
parking
standards.
Based
on
that
discussion,
we
had
really
was
in
regards
to
townhouses
and
the
construction
of
new
townhouses
and
was
the
current
parking
standard
for
them
adequate.
So
we've
provided
you
with
a
couple
of
things.
K
One
is
what
our
current
parking
requirement
for
new
construction
is,
and
right
now
for
all
residential
single-family
mobile
home
two-family,
townhouse
and
multi-family
dwelling
two
parking
spaces
per
unit.
There
are
different
standards
for
more
group
housing
and
commercials,
such
as
hotels
and
motels.
K
The
next
thing
we
did
was
research.
What
other
communities
have
in
regards
to
their
parking
standard
for
townhouses?
So
we
looked
at
our
immediate
neighbors
and
then
a
little
a
little
bit
down
the
coast
and
for
the
most
part
it
was
pretty
consistent,
two
parking
spaces
per
dwelling
unit,
not
for
every
for
every
different
type
of
dwelling
unit,
single
family,
duplex
townhouse.
There
are
a
few
exceptions
as
you'll
see.
K
On
page
two,
for
example,
palm
beach
has
a
little
bit
different
of
a
standard
and
then
jacksonville
actually
requires
some
guest
parking
for
townhouses.
So
I
know
that
the
request
was
specifically
for
this
use,
while
staff
was
reviewing
this
particular
topic,
we've
identified
a
lot
of
other
areas
in
our
parking
and
loading
standards
that
we
know
are
deficient
and
we
would
like
to
update.
There
are
uses
that
we
have
in
jacksonville
beach
that
there
is
no
parking
standard,
for
we
have
to
apply
something
that
isn't
really
relevant
to
that
use.
K
Dog
kennels
is
a
perfect
example.
So,
as
we
were
reviewing
this,
you
know
we.
We
really
think
that
yes,
we
agree.
There
needs
to
be
some
changes
to
the
entire
parking
and
loading
standards,
but
we
are
hesitant
to
do
that
in
a
vacuum
of
not
reviewing
the
whole
land
development
code,
and
we
would
certainly
like
to
make
that
part
of
that
process
when
we
get
to
that,
hopefully,
at
the
end
of
this
year,
beginning
of
the
next
fiscal
year.
K
So
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
guys
have
about
our
parking
standards
or
the
research
that
we
did,
but
my
recommendation
is
to
kind
of
hold
off
on
any
standards
that
just
focus
on
one
thing
outside
of
looking
at
the
entire
code.
As
a
whole
and
making
comprehensive
changes
to
pretty
much
all
of
it,.
C
Counselor
stokes,
I
guess
I
guess
somebody's
got
to
go
first.
I
I,
I
can't
believe
I'm
saying
this,
but
I
like
jacksonville's
their
standard
of
the
the
guest
space
for
every
three.
I
think
that
is
a
kind
of
pragmatic
thinking.
It's.
I
don't
think
it's
a
a
huge
undue
burden
on
on
any
sort
of
development
and
yeah.
I
I
was
kind
of
shocked
that
that
was
in
jacksonville's
code,
but
I
liked
it.
I
would.
C
I
agree
with
staff
that
there
are
a
lot
of
parking
standards
that
do
need
revision,
and
so
I'm
excited
that
we're
tackling
the
lbc
this
year
and
we'll
be
looking
at
all
those,
and
you
know
I
would
I
would
lean
towards
staff
and
administrative's
of
of
doing
it
all
in
one
whole
update
instead
of
piecemeal,
but
obviously
we'll
we'll
go
with
consensus
of
the
council
as
a
whole
and
not
just
my
personal
recommendation.
H
You
know
so
in
thinking
about
this.
This
is
really.
This
is
more
than
a
townhome
issue
really,
and
I
don't
think
it's.
For
example,
you
know
this.
This
could
be
an
issue
for
single-family
homes
where
you've
got
three-bedroom.
For
example,
three
bedroom
two
bath
home
and
you've
got
three
college
students
living
there,
and
you
know
they
have
girlfriends.
So
now,
you've
got
six
cars
that
are
trying
to
park
at
a
single
family
home
that
maybe
has
space
for
three
cars.
H
Maybe
if,
if
you're
lucky
and
and
you
know
in
my
neighborhood
alone,
there's
a
property
that
is
owned-
that
so
it's
not
rented.
So
I
I
was
trying
to
think
about
this.
You
know.
Is
this
an
issue
that
okay,
it
has
to
do
with
tenants?
You
know,
so
you
could
have
multiple
tenants
that
are
not.
H
You
know,
members
of
the
same
family,
but
you
know
there's
a
home
in
my
neighborhood
that
has
three
young
ladies,
that
live
in
it
and
they
they
each
have
boyfriends
and
there's
typically
five
cars
on
the
street
on
any
given
day
and
one
car
in
the
driveway
and
no
car
in
the
garage.
H
So
you
know
it's
it's
an
issue
that
goes
broader
than
the
town
homes,
but
I
think
the
town
homes,
you
know
really
kind
of
brought
it
to
our
attention,
because
it's
something
that
you
know
seems
to
be
happening
in
areas
where
we
had
single
family
originally
and
now
you've
got
multi-family
and
that
tends
to
maybe
make
it
a
little
more
obvious
and
more
exacerbated.
H
But
so
I
you
know,
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
we
probably
need
to
look
at
this
in
a
more
holistic
in
a
you
know,
look
at
everything
as
opposed
to
just
the
town
homes,
but
I
just
wanted
to
mention
to
everyone
the
the
things
that
I've
seen,
because
it
I
do
believe
it
does
go
beyond
the
town
homes.
And
I
don't
know
what
the
solution
is.
J
Thank
you.
I
agree
with
sandy.
It's
not
necessarily
just
a
town
home
issue,
but
that
really
did
bring
it
to
the
fore.
Parking
standards
of
two
per
unit
are
antiquated
because
it's
back
when
they
used
to
think
mom
well,
dad
had
a
car
to
go
to
work
and
mom
would
maybe
need
a
car
to
put
around
to
get
her
daily
things
done.
If
we
look
back
at
where,
when
we
started
thinking
about
two
cars
per
unit,
that
was
more
the
mindset,
only
the
two
adults
drive.
J
They
have
kids
and
eventually
the
kids
aren't
really
they'll
borrow
the
parents
car
if
they're
going
to
drive
anywhere-
and
we
just
don't,
live
like
that
anymore.
So
when
we
are
reviewing
how
we
want
to
try
and
address
this,
we
might
want
to
think
about
things
like
tying
it
to
the
number
of
bedrooms
or
something
like
that,
regardless
of
the
type
of
unit
it
is.
J
I
saw
her
in
here
that
if
it's
a
larger
unit
over
three
thousand
square
feet,
they
have
to
have
three
parking
spaces
so
thinking
beyond
just
a
unit
as
like
a
unit
being
a
one-bedroom
efficiency
or
a
house
or
one
unit
being
an
eight-bedroom
seven-bath
luxury
home
both
need
two
parking
spots.
So
I
think
we
really
need
to
think
a
lot
deeper
about
this,
because
it's
impacting
not
just
town
home
areas
but
neighborhoods.
J
If
you
drive
down
16th
avenue
south
the
closer
you
get
towards
south
beach
parkway,
you
just
see
cars.
I
Yeah,
so
I
would,
I
would
tend
to
agree
with
council
member
dumont
and
golding
to
an
extent,
but
also
they're
being
on
the
board
of
adjustments.
There's
some
considerations
when
you
start
thinking
about
that-
and
I
know
we
have
to
bring
these
all
out
in
the
totality
of
circumstances,
but
a
lot
of
our
properties.
A
greater
portion
of
our
properties
on
the
rs1
as
the
standard
is
set
right
now,
would
never
pass
for
additional
parking
spaces
on
the
property
because
of
the
permanent
ground
coverage
set
at
35
percent.
I
So
it's
it's.
It's
a
bigger
problem
that
I
think
meets
the
eye.
That's
a
consideration
we
got
to
have
and
when
we're
talking
about
either
increasing
parking
spaces
or
making
a
demand
for
guest
spark
guest
parking
spaces,
which
I
I
agree
with
council
member
stokes.
I
think
that's
a
fantastic
idea.
Some
family
members
have
some
condos
and
in
jacksonville
and
they
do
have
guest
parking
if
they
didn't
have
it.
I
J
Thank
you
and
I'm
that's
why
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
say
no.
We
really
need
to
address
this
right
now.
It's
because
if
you
want
to
look
at
ho
it
holistically,
I'm
taking
it
when
we,
you
know
you're,
not
just
holding
it
off,
so
we
can
just
do
the
land
parking
issue.
J
Parking
issue
is
going
to
be
done
with
everything
else
in
the
ldc,
and
we
have
to
be
very
conscious
of
how
a
change
in
one
will
impact
the
others,
and
so
that's
why
I'm
guessing
staff
is
saying
we'd
rather
do
it
holistically
than
just
look
at
parking
and
deal
with
that
and
then
we'll
deal
with
any
issues
that
potentially
happen
in
the
future,
and
so
that's
why
I
support
what
what
staff
is
asking
for
in
the
expectation
that
in
the
long
term,
we
will
find
ways
to
mitigate
a
lot
of
these
issues.
D
Yeah,
I
know
one
of
the
things
that
heather
and
I
have
discussed
when
she
was
putting
this
together,
because
she
brought
up
a
good
point
in
her
memo,
and
that
is
if
the
if
the
parking
requirements
are
changed
right
now,
then
that
means
any
townhouse
property.
If
you
did
it
just
for
townhouses,
you
could
have
a
slew
of
townhouses
that
immediately
become
non-conforming,
and
so
that's
a
that's
a
policy
great
consideration
that
the
council
really
needs
to
give
to
it,
not
just
to
change
it
going
forward.
D
So
if
you
were
to
say
that
you
know
for
every
two
town
houses,
you
need
to
have
one
guest
parking
space,
and
that
means
every
townhouse
development.
That's
been
built
with
multiple
units.
You
know
three
or
four
to
a
to
a
package.
All
of
those
basically
become
non-conforming
properties.
The
way
they're
currently
laid
out-
and
so
there
needs
to
be
consideration
of
how
do
you
handle
that
in
the
event
something
happens
to
those
properties,
council,
member
mesa.
G
Yes,
I
agree
with
my
colleagues
here
on
everything
just
about
and
very
excited.
They
were
finally
looking
into
not
just
the
parking
but
the
odc,
but
just
the
food
for
thought
in
the
future.
G
Once
we
start
doing
this
is
obviously
this
is
going
to
be
long
term,
but
I
just
want
us
to
be
be
proactive
and
not
just
think
in
10
years
they're
coming
up,
but
in
the
next
30
40
50
years,
where
jackson
beach
will
be
so
I
think
you
know
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
take
care
of
our
future
residents
here
in
jacksonville,
beach
and
businesses
and
but
dan
johnson
said,
property
is
a
premium
right
now
and
I
know
the
way
the
city
layout
is
it's
not
really
parking
friendly
on
the
residents
here
on
the
streets,
but
yeah
I
mean
that's
all.
D
D
D
B
If
you
recall
from
last
year,
it
is
part
of
the
city
manager's
contract
that
his
job
performance
be
reviewed
at
least
once
annually.
During
his
anniversary
month
so
similar
to
last
year,
I
sent
out
an
evaluation
form
to
the
directors
regarding
the
city,
manager,
staffing
and
supervision,
and
I
provided
a
summary
of
those
results
to
you,
along
with
the
memorandum
that
mike
had
written
and
just
recently
I
sent
you
the
summary
of
the
evaluations
each
of
you
completed
so
based
on
the
stipulations
in
mike's
contract.
B
J
Not
related
to
the
the
increase
or
anything,
but
the
contract
wording
itself.
We
ran
into
this
last
year
when
three
of
the
council
members
were
brand
new,
and
so
they
had
no
ground
work.
To
really
give
him
a
useful
and
informative
evaluation
which
puts
mike
at
a
disservice
so
included
in
all
of
this
I'd
like
to
add
into
the
amend
the
contract
so,
instead
of
within
the
first
month
of
higher
it
would
the
contract
would
be
instead
of
for
one
for
a
12
month
period.
J
It
would
be
for
about
an
18
period
to
give
any
new
council
members
who
come
in
in
december
some
experience
and
get
their
footing.
So
they
can
actually
give
him
a
recommendation
that
will
be
helpful
for
him
to
meet
their
needs
for
the
next
three
and
a
half
years.
J
Then
obviously,
that's
something
that
would
council
would
have
to
think
is
a
good
idea
as
well
as
mike,
because
it
would
be
the
changing
of
his
contract.
J
J
C
Are
are
we
so
we're
required
to
review
his
performance
at
least
once
annually?
Does
it
have
to
coincide
with
his
anniversary?
Could
we
review
his?
Could
we
do
performance
reviews
say
in
july,
that
would
that
would
give
the
new
council
members
six
months
and
then
so
it's
like
kind
of
like
halfway
through
the
year.
C
That
would
be
to
me
that
would
make
more
sense
than
trying
to
amend
a
contract
unless
there's
a
stipulation
that
it
has
to
be
done
right
before
his
anniversary,
because
if,
if
say
mike
was
hired
in
june,
then
we
would
theoretically
based
on
this
program,
review
him
and
like
end
of
may
early
june.
So
it
just
kind
of
it's
it's
kind
of
like
we
just
hired
mike
at
a
bad
time.
Sorry
mike,
but
he
got
hired
at
the
wrong
time
of
the
year
for
new
council
members.
B
I
My
near
knee-jerk
reaction
reaction
to
this
is
this:
probably
shouldn't
be
changed
unless
we,
unless
somewhere
down
the
road,
we
end
up
changing
city
managers
with
the
incoming
of
a
new
city
manager.
That
might
be
the
time
to
make
a
change
as
to
when
we
do
that
three
of
us
were
faced
with
the
situation
that
you
explained,
though
I
did
have
a
lot
of
information
provided
to
me
from
department
heads
and
the
feedback
we
got
from
hr,
which
really
helped
in
my
first
annual
evaluation.
I
So
I
don't
think
it
was
that
big
of
a
that
big
of
an
issue
at
that
time.
I
I
see
your
point,
but
I
don't
think
that
we
should
be
changing
it
midstream.
One
thing
that
I
experienced
as
a
supervisor
at
jso.
When
I
worked
there
is
times
we
would
pick
up
a
detective
that
was
his
annual
eval
was
coming
up
within
two
months,
and
I've
only
had
two
months
to
work
with
him.
I
So
I
kind
of
leaned
back
on
the
information
that
was
provided
to
me
in
order
to
do
an
effective
eval,
and
it's
just,
I
think,
that's
part
of
part
of
the
way
it
is.
You
know
the
part
of
the
life
that
you
have
to
deal
with
when
you
have
to
you
know,
based
on
the
information,
that's
provided
to
you
now,
making
a
change
like
I
said
before,
not
to
rerun
that
wheel,
maybe
with
the
incoming
of
a
new
city
manager
somewhere
down
the
road
we
can
make
that
change.
That's
just
my
initial
reaction.
A
A
If
you
don't
feel
like
you,
have
enough
information
in
this
area,
not
just
not
to
score
that
area,
and
you
do
an
average
of
the
people
that
have
been
working
with
the
city
manager
and
then
you
know
the
following
time:
they
can
do
it
if
they
feel
like
they
have
enough
information,
then
they
can
go
ahead
and
do
it
anyway.
So
I
I
don't,
I
think
that's
probably
the
best
way
out
of
it
is
just
to
you
know,
give
them
an
ability
to
opt
out
of
certain
areas.
H
You
know
I
I
agree
with
ms
dumont,
though,
because
I
I
I
hope
that
mike
will
be
with
us
for
a
long
time,
and
so
I
would.
I
would
suspect
that
we
will
have
more
new
council
members
coming
on
board
in
late
november
early
december
and
we're
going
to
run
into
this
situation
again.
H
H
You
know
it's
not
been
12
months
now,
it's
maybe
been
18
months,
so
I
you
know,
I
personally
don't
see
that
that
should
be
limiting
us
and
it
would
at
least,
as
ms
dumont
said,
give
the
new
council
members
an
opportunity
to
have
some
experience
working
with
mike
and
be
able
to
provide
some
valuable
input.
A
L
I
I'm
fine
with
leaving
it
where
it
is.
If
it
were
fewer
than
seven
of
us,
I
think
with
seven
people
doing
the
review.
It's
not
like
it's
one
or
two
people
who
are
just
trying
to
get
their
feet
on
the
ground,
but
it
will
always
be
a
group
of
people
who
have
been
here
at
least
two
years
with
the
addition
of
something
less
than
you
know
four
or
less
new
people.
L
So
I
think
I
think
it
was
corey
who
said
if
they're
not
comfortable
filling
something
out,
then
they
can
just
n
a
and
then
the
averages
will
be
done
out
of
six
people
or
whatever
the
amount
is
less
than
that
of
whoever
fills
out
that
section.
So
I'm
fine
with
leaving
it
as
it
is,
and
I'm
just
really
glad
that
we're.
I
Yeah,
the
only
thing
I
would
add
to
that
is:
if
we
were
to
make
that
change,
then
it
would
the
consideration
of
a
retroactive
pay
going
back
those
loss
of
six
months
or
whatever
the
time
we
ever
decided
to
do
would
be.
In
effect,
though,
I
I
tend
to
lean
to
not
changing
at
this
point,
but
that's
a
consideration
is
the
retroactive
portion
of
it.
J
Thank
you
it's
by
nature
to
think
about.
What's
the
worst
that
can
happen
and
mayor
hoffman,
if
you
did
not
run
for
mayor,
we
would
have
had
four
new
people
on
council,
so
you
it
can
come
down
to
a
situation
where
you
have
three
council
people
filling
out
evaluations
based
off
of
two
years
of
experience,
and
that
would
be
the
worst
case
scenario.
I'm
not
saying
it's.
It
might
we're
hoping
you're
here
for
a
very
long
time
where
we
cycle
through
enough
councils,
where
this
is
the
potential
of
happening.
J
But
this
is
something
that
I
I
don't
think
that
that
get
it
puts
him
in
a
good
position
nor
the
city
as
a
whole,
because
the
city
looks
to
us
to
make
sure
that
we
are.
You
know
we
have
proper
oversight
of
our
employees
being
mike
and
sandy.
So,
but
I
understand
the
the
hesitancy,
I
would
say
yes
for
the
retroactive,
but
I
would
like
to
hear
what
mike's
opinion
is
on
this,
since
this
is
really
for
him.
D
The
issue
you're,
referring
to
as
as
councilor
janssen
pointed
out,
is
dealt
with
by
all
of
our
department,
directors
and
supervisory
staff
on
an
annual
basis.
They
get
promoted
into
a
new
position,
they
get
hired
into
the
organization,
they
have
a
new
employee
start
and
they
have
to
deal
with
the
time
frames
that
are
given
to
them
and
figure
it
out
the
best
they
can.
J
Sorry
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on
that
with
what
dan
said
as
well,
because
in
dan
has
a
lot
of
experience
in
government
department.
Heads
have
a
lot
of
experience
in
government
chet
and
fernando
didn't
have
a
lot
of
experience
with
the
public
sector.
They
they
have
experience
in
the
private
sector,
but
not
in
the
public
and
it
functions
differently.
So
that
is
a
concern
you
get
four
new
people
who
have
no
experience
in
government
ever
sat
on
a
board
or
anything
else.
J
It's
just
new
to
them,
and
they
just
don't
know
where
to
go
that.
What
my
not
with
you,
my
well,
that
always
gives
me
pause,
because
that
puts
an
undue
amount
of
power
in
your
hands,
and
some
of
us
would
say
that
we
have
seen
that
happen
in
the
past.
So
that
is
something
that
we
might
want
to
think
about.
C
Yeah
I
mean
I
can
understand
the
concern,
but
I've
got
you
know
I
mean
it
all
depends
on
the
person
right.
I've
got
seven
department,
I
got
seven,
I
don't
know
how
many
department
directors.
I
have
sorry
I
should
probably
know,
but
I've
got
a
lot
of
department,
directors,
I've
hired
and
fired
department
directors
in
the
last
two
years.
I
mean
it's
not
since
I've
been
in
a
high
level
management
role.
So
for
me,
a
performance
eval
is
is
nothing
I
can.
I
look
to
see.
C
I
mean
I
let
someone
go
because
the
staff
was
clueless
underneath
them.
That's
bad
management,
hired
somebody
that
the
staff
loves
underneath
them.
That's
good
management.
So
you
know
you
can
you.
I
do
performance
evaluations
on
my
managers
all
the
time.
So
even
two
months,
I
I
think,
even
a
year
a
year
later,
there's
still
information
that
I
think,
could
better
influence
an
evaluation.
I
think
I
don't
think
we
ever
have
a
complete
picture
of
a
performance
evaluation.
It's
it's
your
personal.
C
Take
I
mean,
that's,
that's
how
I
I
personally
feel
because
I've
been
in
it
for
I've
been
in
kind
of
what
I've
been
doing
for
a
little
while
and
one
person
feels
completely
one
way
and-
and
you
can
completely
disagree,
but
that's
that's
we're
all
human
right.
That's
where
this
this
whole
collective
body
comes
together.
C
It
was
definitely
more
more
difficult
last
year,
but
you
know
just
like
last
year
I
looked
to
what
the
department
had
said
and
this
year
and
then
also
had
another
whole
year
of
working
and
but
I
always
think
that
there's
never
enough
information,
whether
you're
on
the
job
two
months
or
14
months,
there's
always
more
information.
You
could
get
to
help
better.
C
You
know,
do
do
a
performance
eval,
but
you
do
it
with
what
you
got
you
you
put
all
the
information
you
can
together
and
and
do
the
score,
whether
it's
two
months
or
14
months
and
been
doing
it,
for
you
know
my
people
and
did
it
for
mike
and
but
that's
my
personal
take
just
I'm
different
from
somebody
else.
Somebody
else
could
get
on
and
have
never
done
a
performance
eval
before
that's.
I
guess
that's
that
can
happen.
G
Yeah,
I
don't
see
anything
wrong
with
just
doing
your
evaluation
on
your
anniversary.
I've
done
evaluations
for
the
director
of
the
library
since
I've
been
on
the
board.
So
the
same
thing
I
did
with
your
evaluation
and
the
director
of
the
libraries.
G
I
asked
questions
to
the
staff
and
I
based
the
evaluation
on
that
and
whatever
experience
I
had
with
the
director,
I
still
gave
him
a
valuation
and
the
same
thing
that
I
did
with
you
mike
last
year
and
I
asked
questions
and
you
know
wasn't
my
first
time
doing
evaluations
but
yeah.
I
think,
on
your
anniversary.
D
Thank
you,
mayor
hoffman,.
L
I
was
just
gonna
jump
in
since
it
seems
like
there's
not
a
consensus
to
make
this
change
and
transition
to
the
discussion
of
the
actual
evaluation
and
potential
mirror
increase.
Is
that
okay,
with
everybody?
L
Okay
kim?
Did
you
have
anything
else
you
wanted
to
say
before
we
did
that
nope?
That
was
it
okay,
so
I
I
just
want
to
start
off
by
thanking
mike
and
congratulations
on
your
three
year
anniversary.
L
Those
of
us
who
were
paying
attention
or
involved
during
the
transition
between
our
long
time,
city
manager
and
a
new
city
manager
knew
it
could
have
gone
several
different
ways,
not
all
of
them
as
successful
as
we've
seen
this
transition,
not
only
just
with
our
city
manager,
but
onboarding
new
department
heads
bringing
up
and
promoting
from
within,
as
we've
seen,
for
example,
in
our
planning
department,
establishing
some
new
positions
and
just
really
poising
us
in
a
good
position
for
the
future.
L
The
department
head
feedback
was
all
very
useful
and
showed
a
lot
of
consistency,
which
is
always
nice
to
see,
as
well
as
the
feedback
from
our
from
the
council
members.
So
I
want
to
thank
you
guys
all
for
taking
the
time
to
write
some
really
thoughtful
comments
and
again
there.
There
was
some
consistency
and
praise,
but
also
consistency
in
in
some
of
the
things
that
we'd
like
to
like
for
you
to
take
a
look
at
this
year
and
going
forward.
L
So
so
thank
you
for
your
service
to
our
city
and
for
continuing
to
to
really
push
us
to
the
next
level,
and
I
would
certainly
support
a
three
percent
increase
to
your
salary.
I
A
I
concur,
I,
I
appreciate
your
efforts
mike
and
just
the
morale
of
the
city.
Everybody
I
talked
to
just
does
not
give
me
pause
and
and
giving
you
giving
you
the
compliments
you
deserve,
and
you
know
I
would
also
support
a
three
percent
increase.
H
H
I
too
would
support
a
three
percent
increase
for
your
three-year
anniversary,
but
I
would
like
to
ask
you
mike,
based
on
the
feedback
that
you
got
from
us
are.
Are
there
any
items
that
you
would
like
to
share
with
us
that
you
want
to
that
you're
going
to
plan
to
focus
on
in
the
coming
year,
based
from
our
input.
D
The
the
biggest
thing
I
see
here
from
consistency
is
with
regards
to
if,
in
other
words,
if
there's
anything
that
we
should
try
to
focus
on
a
little
more
this
upcoming
year.
It's
with
regards
to
community
or
citizen
communication-
and
I
know
we've
got
a
new
website.
D
But
we
are
taking
a
look
also
with
regards
to
not
just
communication
with
the
residents
and
the
business
owners,
but
also
working
with
our
business
owners
to
communicate
with
the
visitors.
Coming
into
our
community
on
a
short-term
or
temporary
basis
as
well,
and
that's
that's
going
to
be
a
fun
project
because
jacob
and
I
got
to
work
on
the
the
scope
of
that
particular
project
and
it
involves
all
of
our
partners
in
the
hotel
and
hospitality
industries.
So
that's
going
to
be
a
fun
one.
D
So
if
anything,
that's
probably
the
one
that
I've
I
saw
the
most
consistency
with
regards
to
some
thoughts
of
where
we
need
to
focus
a
little
differently
in
the
coming
year,
and
I
think
we're
prepared
to
make
some
strides
in
that
in
that
particular
arena,
and
I
I
would
like
to
reiterate
that
this
is
not
a
one-person
job.
I
could
not
do
what
I
do
without
the
professionalism
and
competence
of
all
the
department,
directors
and
the
staff
underneath
them.
They
are
truly
an
excellent
staff.
D
D
C
Okay
quickly
not
raising
my
hand,
but
I
just
wanted
to
to
also
you
know
say
thanks
to
to
mike
I've.
It's
been.
It's
been
a
lot
of
fun
this
year
through
the
strategic
plan.
A
lot
that
we've
gotten
to
do
as
a
group
has
has
been
a
lot
of
fun
and-
and
you
know,
you've
made
it
part
of
part
of
all
that
we've
done
you've
been
a
part
of
and
made,
I
would
say
you
know,
your
presence
has
made
it
enjoyable.
You
know
on
a
lot
that
we've
done,
so
we
really.
C
I
really
appreciate
that
because
it
could
be.
I
know
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
gm's
and
stuff
that
are
that
are
dull,
and
it's
it's
not
that,
and
so
this
is
a
really
fun
group
and
you
being
a
part
of
that
group,
it
has
been
really
well.
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
real
quick
as
we
conclude.
D
Thank
you,
chad,
I'd
like
to
tip
my
hat
to
the
seven
of
you
as
well
for
as
diverse
backgrounds,
as
you
all
have,
and
different
interests
with
regards
to
what
you
want
to
see
with
the
city
of
where
we
go
and
how
we
do
it.
The
fact
is
that
the
seven
of
you,
while
you're,
while
you're
independent
in
your
own
rights,
you're
all
working
very
well
together
as
a
council,
and
I
think
it
makes
our
briefings
and
our
meetings
go
a
lot
smoother
from
that.
D
From
that
perspective,
we're
getting
some
good
things
done.
We've
got
a
lot
more
things
to
accomplish
here
this
upcoming
year
and
I'm
really
happy
to
be
working
with
the
seven
seven
of
you
in
that
in
that
area,.
D
D
Kind
of
I
kind
of
gave
I
let
the
cat
out
of
the
bag
a
little
bit
earlier.
Wanted
to.
Let
council
know
that,
currently,
on
february
14th,
at
that
council
briefing,
we
will
be
reviewing
the
strategic
plan
operational
plan.
I
actually
plan
on
getting
that
out
to
you
in
the
next
week
or
so
so
that
you
actually
have
time
to
look
at
it
well
in
advance.
D
But
it's
it's
our
take
on
the
things
we
need
to
be
doing
as
an
organization
the
projects
and
initiatives
we
need
to
be
working
on
in
order
to
further
the
priorities,
goals
and
objectives
that
you've
all
laid
out.
So
look
forward
to
that
in
your
inbox
in
the
next
week
or
so,
and
then
we
also
have
on
that
same
one
in
february,
we'll
also
be
discussing
micro
mobility,
follow-up
with
the
city
attorney
and
then
talking
about
some
more
changes
that
we
we
are
planning
for
the
organization
to
be
more
responsive
with.
C
Yeah
mike
I
was
under
the
weather
during
the
briefing
we
discussed
the
arpa
funding,
and
are
we
going
to
review
that
in
another
briefing
coming
up
on
before,
because
I,
if
I
remember
correctly
like
I
said
I
was,
I
was
pretty
down
and
out,
but
I
think
there
was
some
thought
on
on.
Possibly
you
know
doing
a
staff
thing
for
part
of
the
funding
and
then
also
part
of
the
funding
going.
I
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
that.
D
There
was
a
there
was
a
consensus
to
move
forward
with
the
priority
one
that
we
had
laid
out,
which
was
to
use
the
first
tranche
of
arpa
funding,
which
was
a
combination
of
both
federal
and
distribution
from
city
of
jacksonville
for
a
majority
of
capital
projects
and
infrastructure
projects
that
we
have
slated
the
priority.
Two
projects
were
where
we
were
looking
to
do
a
little
bit
more
of
of
a
community
impact.
We
actually,
I
believe,
had
suggested
making
some
enhancements
to
the
carver
center
and
some
of
the
infrastructure
around
that
facility.
D
Clearly
that
one,
I
think,
is
a
little
more
nebulous
and
there
was
a
consensus
I
think,
to
come
back
and
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that
priority
to
funding
which
we
would
probably
do
later
in
the
spring
of
this
year,
and
that's
again,
it's
it's
not
it's!
Not
a
small
dollar
amount
that
that
second
year
tranche
is
again
between
eight
and
nine
million
dollars.
D
If,
if
city
of
jacksonville
puts
another
round
on
the
table,
as
they've
indicated,
they
will
consider
so
we'll
have
somewhere
between
six
and
nine
million
dollars
for
that
second
round.
D
I
believe
you
all
should
have
received
a
forwarded,
email
from
councilmember
golding
who
had
attended
the
was
it
florida
league
of
cities
sandy
that
you
had
attended
and
provided
some
some
consolidated
notes
for
you
all
to
consider.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
has
any
report
outs
that
they
would
like
to
do.
L
Mine
not
necessarily
report
out,
but
just
two
quick
things
and
one
thank
you
sandy
for
putting
that
summary
together.
That
was
really
interesting,
and
I
wish
I
had
been
there
to
hear
the
actual
presentations
that
those
notes
came
from
so
appreciate
you
doing
that
you
you
guys
are
gonna,
see
some
more
interviews
come
around
for
the
pension
board.
Appointees
we've
got
some
reappointments
and
some
open
spots
coming
the
pension
board.
L
We
it
kind
of
fell
through
the
cracks
in
terms
of
our
new
board
interview
and
selection
process,
because
not
all
of
the
seats
on
the
pension
board
are
council
appointed,
so
we're
working
on
refining
that
process
a
little
bit
more,
that
we
would
have
kind
of
one
round
of
interviews.
That
would
involve
not
only
the
city
council
but
would
involve
the
pen.
The
pension
board
members
themselves,
if
they're
interested,
since
some
of
some
of
the
seats
are
appointed
by
on
to
the
board
by
the
board.
L
So
so
you'll
see
that
come
around
same
as
with
our
other
interviews,
if
you're
able
to
attend
they'll
all
be
on
zoom
and
we're
working
on
a
new
set
of
questions,
because
the
prior
set
of
questions
really
was
so
broad
and
covered
all
of
the
boards
where
pension
board
questions
can
be
a
little
more
specific
to
financial
management
investments.
Things
like
that,
so
just
keep
an
eye
out
for
that
and
then
also
our
legislative
session
starts
this
week.
So
that's
terrifying.
L
The
I
know
a
lot
of
us
were
going
over
to
tallahassee
for
league
of
cities
lobby
days.
Our
our
lobbyists
have
actually
offered
to
set
up
either
dinner
on
tuesday
night
or
lunch
on
wednesday,
and
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
you
all
had
a
preference,
I
would
think
dinner
on
tuesday
night.
Just
because
wednesday
you
could
potentially
be
getting
in
the
car
and
driving
home
so
and
they're
going
to
set
up
some
legislator
meetings
for
us
as
well.
L
A
Going
over
tomorrow
for
the
state
of
the
state
address
if
anyone's
gonna
be
in
tallahassee,
let
me
know:
I'm
gonna
be
over.
There.
H
I
don't
know
if
everybody
gets
the
emails
from
the
league
of
cities,
but
they
are
doing
monday
morning
call-ins,
which
are
really
really
good.
If
you've
not
done
those.
I
just
want
to
recommend
that
you
do
that.
It's
a
great
opportunity
to
hear
from
the
lobbyists
with
the
league
of
cities
and
get
updates
on
where
the
bills
stand.
H
D
Just
a
reminder
for
everyone
that
on
wednesday
evening,
we've
got
the
community
open
house
to
discuss
the
proposed
charter
amendment
for
creating
an
additional
height
incentive
in
the
downtown
business
district.
That'll
start
at
5
pm
and
the
city
will
be
broadcasting
that
we've
worked
out
with
with
jacob.
I
think
we're
going
to
have
a
a
portable
device
broadcasting
for
us,
so
we
look
forward
to
seeing
you
all
there
and
then
we'll
have
our
next
regular
council
meeting
next
tuesday
in
council
chambers
at
6pm.