►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting (10/17/2022)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
That's
right,
good
and
racist
Heavenly
Father.
We
just
want
to
thank
you
for
your
blessings
each
and
every
day
that
we
provide
for
us
Lord,
give
us
strength
and
direction
and
how
to
lead
the
city
forward.
So
we
just
thank
you
for
everything
that
you
give
us,
and
especially
your
son
Jesus,
whether
it's
in
this
name,
we
pray,
amen.
C
B
A
A
E
Just
want
to
remind
everybody
that
there
will
be
a
workshop,
this
Thursday,
the
20th
at
6
PM
for
the
CRA,
but
it's
part
of
the
comp
plan
in
Land
Development
code
update
and
for
those
citizens
who
were
not
able
to
make
it
to
the
citizens
workshop
for
the
comp
plan
and
Land
Development
code
update.
You
can
go
to
cojbupdate.com
and
the
Consultants
have
questions
on
the
home
page
there
that
were
asked
the
night
of
the
workshop,
and
you
can
actually
enter
your
information
to
provide
the
Consultants.
E
Your
comments
about
Jax
Beach,
which
you
what
you
like
about
Jax
Beach,
which
you'd
like
to
see
changed
that
kind
of
thing
and
that
your
input
is
important
because
the
comp
plan
does
and
the
Land
Development
code
does
guide
how
our
community
grows,
and
so
we
want
our
citizens
to
have
input
on
that.
I
also
want
to
let
everybody
know
this
Friday
we
have
the
Moonlight
movie,
Hocus,
Pocus
and
I.
Believe.
What
time
does
that
start?
Prayer
I
didn't
write
down
the
time.
I
don't
know!
Well
sorry
and.
E
Remind
everybody
early
voting,
starts
on
the
24th
and
also
want
to
encourage
everybody,
because
I've
been
getting
a
lot
of
calls
from
residents
who
want
to
understand
better
the
16
Charter
amendments
that
we
have
on
our
ballot.
This
year,
the
city
council
went
through
a
lot
of
work
to
review
the
charter
and
we
hope
that
in
the
future
we
won't
have
this
many
amendments,
because
we
will
hope
to
review
the
charter
more
frequently,
but
I
encourage
everyone
to
go
to
the
city's
website
jacksonvillebeach.org
and
on
the
home
page.
E
There
you'll
find
a
link
to
read
about
the
charter
amendments
and
it
get
more
familiar
with
it
before
you
vote,
and
one
other
thing
I
wanted
to
mention
is
on
the
29th
from
10
a.m,
to
2
p.m.
The
Jax
Beach
Police
Department
is
going
to
have
the
DEA
National
Drug,
take
back
day
where
you
can
bring
any
medication
that
you
need
to
get
rid
of
to
the
police
department
and
they
will
dispose
of
it.
For
you.
A
A
The
Wi-Fi
here
is
terrible.
Any
other
announcements
on
Council
I
just
wanted
to
mention
to.
A
A
For
their
loyal
service
to
their
church
and
to
our
community
and
then
also
application
application
period
for
the
seat
that
was
held
for
Stokes
resigned
has
opened
opened
today.
So
if
you
are
interested
in
learning
more
more,
please
check
out
our
Facebook
page
website
or
contact
our
city
clerk's
office.
Anybody
else.
Okay,
courtesy
of
the
floor.
We've
got
Mr
Ken
Marsh!
You
will
come
up.
Give
us
your
name
and
address.
We'll
have
three
minutes.
G
G
There
is
no
doubt
we
will
see
continued
growth
in
the
future
with
such
projects
as
the
dolphin
Deco
property,
JJ,
Gallery
old
Cindy's
bar
Latham,
Park,
Plaza,
Casa,
Maria
vacant
lot
and
possibly
a
parking
complex,
although
it's
great
to
attract
new
people
to
come
downtown.
Ultimately,
our
success
is
tied
to
our
ability
to
attract
and
entice,
repeat
guests
and
residents.
Naturally,
repeat,
customers
make
more
purchases
over
time
as
they
trust
the
brand
and
Trust
the
experience,
all
of
which
offer
business
owners
higher
value
over
a
larger
period
of
time.
The
tips
I
show
you
tonight.
G
The
garbage
in
the
streets,
construction
fences
laying
about
indicates
our
downtown
Falls,
far
short
of
encouraging
trust
in
a
positive
downtown
experience.
Imagine
bringing
bringing
new
guests
to
okazoo
having
an
ice
meal
only
to
walk
out
snow
garbage.
Is
that
the
experience
that
exudes
come
back
and
see
us
again?
We
need
codes
to
address
the
problems.
I
recommend
we
replicate
the
cities
that
have
codes
that
work
and
minimize
the
impact
these
construction
projects
have
on
existing
businesses.
G
G
Everybody
has
ownership
in
this
city,
Mike,
city
manager,
I'm
sure
we
have
staff
people
going
all
through
the
downtown
all
day
every
day,
irrespective
of
their
tasks,
they
need
to
be
accountable
to
be
a
watchful
caretaker
in
all
areas,
even
if
not
their
own
to
the
city,
manager
and
mayor.
You
both
have
offices
down
here.
Fernando,
you
have
a
business
here.
Who
are
you
I
see
you
walking
your
dog
here?
What
are
you
seeing
and
more
important
recording
in
your
walkabouts?
G
Do
not
let
the
picks
I
show
you
tonight
reflect
embrace
the
beach
life.
The
mayor
more
than
anyone
on
the
Deus
knows
how
passionate
I
am
that
we
must
stop
seeing
our
downtown
and
they
brought
us
with
pit
holes.
She
has
seen
me
talk
about
our
downtown
Decay
for
10
years
and
I'm
still
talking
about
it.
Garbage
sits
in
the
street.
Closet
spots
are
left
clean
unclean
for
days,
streets,
look
more
dirty
than
clean
culture.
Change
starts
at
the
top
with
our
city,
leaders,
city
manager
and
staff.
A
C
You've
got
their
monthly
Financial
reports
for
September,
although
this
represents
the
entire
fiscal
year.
It's
prepared
on
a.
E
C
F
Misty
March,
thank
you
so
that
last
piece
that
we
were
just
saying
that
you're
still
going
to
be
calculating
to
get
the
full
month
in
that's
when
a
question
that
would
answer
why
some
of
the
budget
amounts
that
we
have
for
income
aren't
at
100
correct.
Are
there
any
that
you
think
will
be
short
still
weekend
after.
C
I,
don't
really
answer
that
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
can
send
you
an
email
if
you
guys
were
looking
right
now.
Our
state
sharings,
we
perceived
12
months
of
that.
The
approvals
that
we'll
be
doing
for
other
revenues
are
our
utility
income,
where
we
have
on
both
consumption.
That
will
happen
throughout
the
month
of
October.
C
H
A
H
Before
you
for
Item
B
is
an
emergency
sewer
repair,
it
started
on
September
14th.
We
came
in
from
the
sinkhole
very
large
sinkhole.
We
responded
getting
some
contractors
to
come
out
and
look
at
it
get
some
business
to
make
some
repairs.
Those
repairs
were
authorized
on
an
emergency
basis
by
the
city
manager,
so
this
is
kind
of
approving.
H
After
the
fact
we
have
updated
this
amount
actually-
and
you
can
see
in
the
memo
where
it
was
has
kind
of
changed
because
as
they
got
in
there
and
found
that
picture
on,
the
right
shows
what
they
found
after
they.
H
So
you
can
see
the
majority
of
the
material
that
we
lost
is
in
the
pipe,
so
they
had
a
that
piece
of
pipe
above
you
can
see,
there's
no
hop
in
it.
That's
where
everything
kind
of
went
in
the
process
of
that
sequel
to
developed,
so
the
repair
is
made
in
the
they're,
actually
putting
it
back
together
and
getting
all
the
restoration
done
right
now.
A
C
Eight
out
725
Bon,
Air,
Circle,
Jax
Beach
I
just
wanted
to
address
this
issue
a
little
bit
further
with
you.
In
the
last
year
of
particular,
there
have
been
significant
numbers
of
major
depressions.
I
won't
call
them
sinkholes,
but
major
depressions
in
a
number
of
our
roadways
throughout
the
city.
I
can
count
eight
to
ten
of
them
and
if
you
hit
it,
you're
going
to
be
jar
significantly
in
your
vehicle
and
I
can
guarantee
you.
Your
alignment
is
not
going
to
be
working
in.
C
To
address
many
of
these
locations
are
associated
with
storm
water,
inlet
pipes
and
so
forth,
and
I
can
identify,
as
I
said,
eight
to
ten
of
them
myself.
I
think
we
need
to
get
those
addressed
quickly
and
proactively,
rather
than
reactively
and
ending
up
with
146
000
bill.
C
I
would
like
to
see
the
council
determine
the
course
of
action
that
will
start
to
address
the
significant
issues
that
we're
seeing
in
our
locally
and
most
of
these,
that
I've
personally
seen
have
occurred
really
within
the
last
year.
There
must
be
something
with
the
sub
base
or
the
areas
around
these
pipe
connections
that
are
causing
some
real
deterioration,
but
hopefully
you
can
address
this
issue.
Thank
you.
B
F
H
H
This
is
a
weird
scenario,
but
this
was
kind
of
a
connection
between
a
clay,
pipe
and
steel
pipe
and
the
way
it
was
all
put
together
when
some
some
maintenance
had
been
done
previously,
and
some
repairs
had
been
done
so,
but
throughout
the
town
we
have
all
kinds
of
pipes
that
are
the
same
age
or
worse
and
we're
trying
to
address
those
systematically
as
we
do,
and
we
do
have
a
recurring
budget
that
deals
with
slip
lining
and
we
try
to
put
together
a
project
to
deal
with
slip
lining
throughout
the
city
to
help
extend
our
current
infrastructure.
F
And
are
you
currently
getting
enough
public
dollars
to
make
sure
that
you
are
addressing
as
many
as
possible
per
year
to
try
and
avoid
this
as
much
as
possible
kind
of
what
Mr
pigtail
was
just
saying?
Do
we
do
you
have
a
plan
that
kind
of
assesses
these
are
the?
This
is
all
of
them
that
we
need
to
address
I'm
going
to
address
this
percentage
this
year,
this
percentage
next
year,
so.
H
F
H
Don't
know
that
I
have
an
answer
for
that.
I,
don't
know
that
because
I
don't
I
mean
with
the
prices
that
we're
seeing
reflected
now
what
we
were
paying
to
get
significantly
more
done
is
not
going
as
far
as
it
is
so
some
of
the
areas
we
have
to
spend
some
of
this
money
for
lining
manholes
and
lining
lining
and
cleaning
up
issues
and
problems
as
they
develop
when
we
find
them.
So
so
some
of
that
money
gets
spent
different
ways
and
we
try
to
help
to
get
as
much
of
this
done
as
we
can.
F
H
H
Data,
we
have
a
whole
bunch
of
it
that
is
still
listed
as
unknown.
So
when
we
try
to
find
those,
we
try
to
see
if
we
can
chase
them
back
down
and
try
to
get
that
data
updated
to
what
the
whatever
the
main
pipe
is
when
it
was
installed
as
best
we
can.
So
we
are
chasing
some
of
those.
A
lot
of
that
is
older
as
adults
trying
to
get
that
put
on
our
GIS
if
things
updated.
So
as.
C
A
Yes,
council,
member
Dumont,
yes
mayor,
Hoffman,
yes,
motion
carries
on
to
our
first
coordinates:
it's
not
going
to
be
able
to
introduce
that
one.
C
A
A
C
C
Thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
Sherman
Smith
I'm,
the
Democratic
nominee
for
state
senate
here
in
District,
4.
I
live
over
on
14th
Street
South
I've
been
a
resident
of
Jacksonville
Beach
since
2017
and
I
think
this
is
a
good
idea.
I
think
adopting
Juneteenth
Juneteenth
as
an
official
holiday
for
Jacksonville
Beach
is
a
second
right
direction
for
healing
and
our
community,
and
it
can
be
valuable
for
all
of
us.
So
I
wanted
to
thank
you
for
considering
it
for
adoption
and
I
hope
it
goes
through.
A
Thank
you,
Ms
Smith.
Would
anyone
like
speak
in
opposition
to
the
ordinance
and
would
anyone
else
want
to
speak
either
for
or
against
the
ordinance
public
hearing
is
now
closed?
How
can
I
get
a
mission
I.
B
D
C
J
J
J
So
the
applicant
is
referring
to
this
project
as
the
Beach
Boulevard
mixed
use,
neighborhood
neighborhood
center.
It's
a
mystery
on
the
property.
As
we
all
know,
it's
been
a
theme
park
since
the
mid-1990s,
the
properties
sold
to
a
new
owner
in
2021
who
designed
to
do
a
multi-family
project
on
the
property
and
the
theme
park
has
been
operational.
While
the
applicant
works
out,
the
details
of
their
project,
cities
hosted
two
public
workshops
in
June
and
August
of
2021,
where
we
sought
to
get
some
feedback
from
the
community
and
from
Council.
J
The
original
applications
were
filed
in
2021
for
a
future
land
use
change
and
a
rezoning,
but
to
allow
for
427
apartments
and
those
original
applications
were
deferred
at
the
request
of
the
applicant
at
the
December
13th
2021
Planning
Commission
meeting
to
allow
some
additional
time
for
the
applicant
to
work
on
staff's
concerns
and
some
of
the
changes
from
that
original
application.
Are
the
applicant
applied
to
and
received
approval
from
FEMA
to
remove
a
portion
of
the
property
out
of
the
special
flood
Hazard
area
to
free
up
a
small
portion
of
additional
property
for
development.
J
That's
outside
of
a
flood
zone
and
the
request
was
based
on
existing
conditions
of
the
property
or
existing
elevations
that
are
already
there.
As
it's
developed,
the
applicant
also
revised
site
plan
to
Cluster
to
the
development
in
towards
the
northwest
of
the
property
and
provide
a
required
50-foot
Upland
buffer
between
the
development
and
established
wetlands
and
the.
J
J
A
small
element
of
supporting
commercial
that
would
not
exceed
5
000
square
feet,
total
and
I
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
flood
zones
and
as
how
they
relate
to
what
the
applicant
requested.
The
blue
is
AE
flood
zone,
to
which
our
flood
zone
regulations
in
our
local
codes
apply.
The
pink
is
what's
called,
shaded
X
and
our
regulations
do
not
apply,
and
these
kind
of
tan
areas
are
not
in
a
flood
zone.
J
So
the
applicant
was
able
to
essentially
petition
to
FEMA
to
get
some
small
portions
of
this
property
here
and
kind
of
the
fringes
of
this
taken
out
of
the
flood
zone.
What's
in
the
AE
flood
zone
that
was
removed
equates
to
a
little
less
than
less
than
an
acre
of
property
total.
The
majority
of
it
is
in
this
shaded
X.
J
So
basically,
what
they
did
was
show
did
a
survey
of
the
property
and
show
FEMA
that
this
property,
for
the
most
part,
is
higher
than
what
the
flood
zones
show
and
they
were
able
to
get
a
portion
of
it
removed.
So
a
project,
a
summary
of
the
project.
They
are
proposing
10.9
Acres
of
project
area
for
development
with
multi-family
at
40
dwelling
units
per
acre.
This
would
be
427.
Multi-Family
units
is
what
they're
proposing
with
1800
square
feet
of
commercial
in
the
form
of
a
coffee
shop
of
the
5
000
square
feet
of
aggregate
commercial.
J
If
they
were
to
get
to
that
total
square
footage
would
include
things
like
retail
office,
personal
service
and
child
day
care
as
permitted
uses,
but
as
of
now,
they're
only
they're
only
proposing
that
1800
square
feet,
and
they
also
are
proposing
a
welcome
to
Jacksonville
Beach
sign
for
the
northwest
corner
of
the
property,
and
we
have
some
more
slides
world
show
of
their
proposed
location.
For
that.
J
They
are
requesting
to
change
7.66,
Acres
of
community
commercial
to
high
density,
residential
3.24,
Acres
from
Recreation
open
space
Also
to
high
density
residential
to
just
over
two
acres
to
Recreation,
open
space,
0.14,
acres
and
point
of
commercial
and
0.31
Acres
of
residential
to
wreck
open
space
and
18.8
Acres
of
low
density,
residential
into
conservation
and
the
entire
property,
which
is
just
under
54
Acres
they're.
J
J
The
other
part
of
parcel
8
is
low
density,
residential
and
there's
this
little
sliver
over
here
of
high
density
residential
and
what
the
applicant
is
proposing,
but
they
are
requesting,
is
new
Parcels
one
and
two
to
be
high
density,
residential
with
Parcels
four
and
five
remaining
Recreation
open
space,
adding
a
little
Recreation
open
space
over
here,
parcel
6,
remaining
conservation
and
the
entirety
of
the
30
Acres
of
parcel
8,
also
going
into
conservation
where
parcel
7
changing
from
high
density
residential
to
Recreation
open
space.
J
As
far
as
the
zoning,
these
are
the
existing
zoning
District
designations.
You've
got
a
community
commercial
front
and
Beach
Boulevard,
where
Adventure
Landing
sits.
Now
this
kind
of
yellowy
color
is
a
residential
multi-family.
Blue
is
residential
single
family
and
these
two
orange
areas
are
planned
unit
development.
These
are
the
two
areas
of
the
existing
overflow
dirt
parking
lots
for
Adventure
Landing.
The
zoning
was
changed
back
in
the
late
90s,
and
this
shows
the
entirety
of
the
property
as
it
would
be
under
their
requested
fee,
do
something
so
this
is
the
proposed
updated
site
plan.
J
The
applicant
has
a
separate
presentation
after
this,
with
some
additional
information
they
would
like
to
share
so
SAS
analysis
is
that
the
project,
as
was
amended
by
the
applicant
from
the
original
application,
does
not
increase
residential
density
in
the
special.
J
The
Planning
Commission
had
desire
to
have
a
more
detailed
traffic
study,
which
I
believe
you
all
were
provided
with
from
the
applicant
this
week.
They
wanted
some
additional
time
to
review
the
application.
They
also
were
concerned
with
providing
Workforce
housing
again.
This
is
not
something
that
our
plans
require,
but
it
is
encouraged
and
they
also
were
interested
in
the
present
preservation
of
protected
trees.
J
The
applicant
did
reply
a
response
to
all
of
the
planning
commission's
concerns.
As
I
mentioned,
they
did
provide
a
detailed
traffic
analysis
which
is
not
required
by
the
code,
but
I
believe
you
all
should
have
a
copy
of
that,
and
it
is
showing
that
the
project
will
not
have
a
significant
impact
on
existing
roadways
or
intersections
in
the
vicinity
of
the
project.
They
also
are
proposing
some
lighting
restrictions
on
the
property
that
would
ensure
that
lighting
does
not
negatively
affect
any
adjacent
properties.
J
They
are
also
offering
that
the
applicant
and
the
developer
would
work
with
the
city
for
three
years
to
work
on
some
type
of
Trail
connection
or
Urban,
Trails
type
connection
to
or
from
the
property
again
the
welcome
side,
and
it's
shown
on
it
on
a
elevation
in
one
of
the
pictures
kind
of
see
where
that's
located.
They
are
also
proposing
some
Workforce
housing
and
have
committed
to
the
preservation.
K
J
A
D
An
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Jacksonville,
Beach
Florida
amending
the
2030
comprehensive
plan
of
future
land
use
map
providing
for
a
change
of
future
land
use;
designations
on
approximately
30.33
acres
of
land,
located
south
of
Beach
Boulevard
between
Hobson
Road
and
Jardine
demere
place
from
Community
commercial
to
high
density,
residential
conservation
and
density
resident.
I'm.
A
Thank
you
manother.
This
ordinance
for
the
amendment
to
the
tax
of
the
2030
comprehensive
plan
is
before
this
Council
for
a
public
hearing
and
adoption
on
its
first
reading.
Under
the
laws
of
the
State
of
Florida
and
ordinance,
which
changes
the
text
of
an
element
of
the
city's
2030
comprehensive
plan
is
a
quasi-legislative
proceeding.
A
quasi-legislative
proceeding
means
that
the
governing
body
is
acting
in
its
rule-making
capacity.
It
is
the
duty
of
the
city
council
to
arrive
at
found
decisions
regarding
proposed
changes
to
the
text
of
the
adopted,
2030
comprehensive
plan.
A
This
includes
receiving
citizen
input
regarding
any
proposed
tax
change.
The
application
has
been
reviewed
by
staff
and
the
Planning
Commission
for
consistency
with
other
portions
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
council
may
hear
from
all
interested
parties
in
the
legislative
determination
of
an
amendment
to
the
text
of
the
city's
2030
comprehensively
the
council's
decision
on
a
comprehensive
plan.
Amendment
application
is
based
on
the
criteria
set
forth
in
section
34-22
of
their
Land
Development
code.
Each
member
of
the
council
has
provided
with
a
copy
I
will
now
open
the
public
hearing
letter
on
December
2022-8181.
I
Steve
and
I
wanted
to
Drive
Suite
1200
during
behalf
of
the
applicant
I.
Don't
know
if
you
need
to
sort
the
internet
but
typically
okay.
Thank
you,
so
I'm
going
to
talk
a
little
bit.
Heather
did
a
great
job
talking
about
the
history
of
the
project,
I'm
going
to
go
through
and
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
changes
that
have
been
made,
not
only
since
our
first
application
was
filed,
but
also
since
the
meeting
that
we
had
and
with
the
Planning
Commission
a
few
weeks
ago.
I
So
recall
this
other
Adventure
that
we
were
delayed
about
nine
months.
While
we
worked
with
FEMA.
The
purpose
of
that
analysis
was
to
take
our
topographic
survey
of
the
property
and
to
have
FEMA
confirm
the
amount
of
land
that
was
located
outside
of
the
flood
zone
and
after
analysis,
they
determined
that
10.9
Acres
of
property
is
located
outside
the
flood
zone
and,
as
a
result,
our
proposal
we
shrink
the
size
of
the
development
parcel
so
that
we
can
make
the
commitment
that
we
would
not
impact
the
flood
zone
and
not
increase
it
in
any
way.
I
Secondly,
we
have
had
427
market
rate
apartments
in
the
application.
Since
the
beginning,
we
also
added
a
coffee
shop,
which
was
in
reaction
to
a
neighborhood
and
Community
feedback.
We
also
added
a
viewing
platform,
that's
available
for
connection
with
the
public
right-of-way,
we'll
talk
more
about
that
later,
but
both
of
those
things
were
added
as
a
result
of
the
community
meetings
that
we
had.
I
Our
main
goal
here,
though,
is
implementing
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
regarding
housing
and
I
won't
reread
the
housing
element,
but,
in
short,
the
city's
goal
is
to
provide
affordable
housing
in
a
large
in
a
variety
of
housing
options
to
the
citizens
so
graphically.
This
is
what
happened
in
October
of
2021.
Our
development
parcel
was
13.87
acres
in
our
resubmission
in
September
of
this
year
that
shrank
about
22,
so
it
shranked
down
to
about
10.9
Acres.
I
As
a
result
of
the
changes
that
we've
made,
there's
been
a
40
decrease
in
the
total
land,
that's
available
for
development,
I'm.
Sorry,
there's
a
40
decrease
in
yeah
the
total
land
available
for
development,
there's
been
a
60
increase
in
land
that
is
either
conservation
or
open
space
and
that's
really
rapidly
depicted
by
the
yellow
versus
the
Green.
So
obviously
the
yellow
is
dramatically
shrunk
and
the
green
has
dramatically
increased
these
next
two
side
points
here
are
a
little
bit
busy,
but
but
bear
with
me
here
just
a
second.
I
Basically,
this
area
here
is
already
located
outside
of
the
flood
zone
according
to
FEMA
these
areas.
Here
these
light
greens
and
dark
greens
were
not
located
outside
of
the
flood
zone,
and
this
is
what
we
have
FEMA
confirmed,
so
that
these
dark
green
here
they're
not
on
the
flood
zone,
because
they're
currently
Retention
Ponds
this
green
down
here.
When
they
take
maps
of
flood
zones,
they
do
it
from
satellite
imagery,
and
so
it's
it's
not
always
super
accurate,
especially
when
you
get
to
the
point
where
the
land
hits
the
water.
So.
I
To
really
confirm
whether
something's
in
the
flood
zone
or
not,
is
by
doing
a
topographic
survey
which
we
did
and
then
we
submitted
to
FEMA
for
confirmation.
The
other
thing
that
we
did
is
we
inserted
this
black
dotted
line
here.
This
is
the
boundary
of
development.
That's
permitted.
Our
original
development
boundary
went
all
the
way
to
the
edge
of
our
property
line
all
the
way
through
here
and
then
back
up.
I
We
added
the
black
dotted
line
after
talking
with
South
in
order
to
increase
the
buffers
away
from
Salt
marshes,
freshwater,
wetlands
and
Coastal
High
Hazard.
So.
I
We
are
not
impacting
the
coastal
iazard
we're
not
attacking
salt
marshes,
freshwater
weapons
or
increasing
the
amount
of
land.
That's
located
in
the
flood
zone.
All
of
those
things.
We
then
added
a
viewing
platform,
which
this
is
just
a
concept,
but
that
is
to
give
access
to
the
open
space.
That's
located
to
the
South.
The
recurring
theme
Here
is
that
we're
trying
to
further
Implement
in
the
comprehensive
plan
by
protecting
the
environment
by
giving
true
access
to
the
conservation
and
the
recreation
and
open
space
and
then
finally,
by
improving
water
quality.
I
So
this
Pond
right
here
is
another
Edition.
Today,
roughly
in
this
area,
you
can
kind
of
see
it
up
a
photo
underneath
the
blue
and
in
this
area,
as
you
can
kind
of
see,
underneath
the
photo
are
parking
lots.
Those
parking
lots,
although
they're
designated
Recreation
and
open
space
cars
park
there
year
round,
and
so
anything
that
comes
off
of
the
cars
goes
into
a
pipe
and
then
gets
directly
discharged
into
the
intercoastal.
I
What
this
does
with
the
pond
is
it
takes
anything
that
that
comes
off
of
The,
Hardscape
or
anything
that
comes
out
of
the
parking
lots.
It
goes
with
a
retention
Pond
that
settles
out
and
treats
the
water
and
then
discharges
clean
water
into
the
wetlands,
which
is
the
preferred
way
to
handle
all
of
those
issues
from
the
Civil
Engineering
standpoint.
So
it's
a
dramatic
increase
in
water
quality
that
was
recognized
by
the
Planning
Commission,
specifically
all
right.
I
So
when
you
do
all
the
math
and
I
realize,
there's
lots
of
different
parcels
and
some
go
up
and
some
go
down,
but
when
you
do
all
of
the
math
and
get
get
to
the
very
bottom
of
it,
this
2.75
acres
is
being
we're
asking
to
take
that
from
Recreation
and
open
space
and
to
turn
that
into
development.
Today.
This
is
remember.
The
majority
of
this
site
today
is
parking
so.
I
I
A
seven
to
one
swap
or
seven
to
one
increase
in
the
exchange
going
from
developable
to
land,
to
conservation
and
Recreation
again,
this
is
just
a
recapitulation
of
some
of
the
math
on
the
different
Parcels.
I
I
So
if
we
just
developed
the
parcel
with
a
grocery
store
and
Retail,
we
would
be
generating
significantly
more
traffic
and
we
would
not
be
stopping
her
today
for
anything
we
would
just
be
going
to
pull
a
building
permit,
that's
a
big,
a
really
big
deal
and
we'll
talk
more
about
it
later
in
the
results
of
the
traffic
study.
Finally,
what.
I
Is
that
80
percent
of
the
property
is
being
conserved
in
an
open
space,
and
93
percent
of
that
is
continuous,
which
is
something
that
your
conservation
I
mean
that
your
you
know
the
conservation
element.
Is
your
comprehensive
plan
really
really
likes?
We
talked
about
storm
water
already.
The
last
thing
is
about
improved
notice
for
residents.
So
today
this
property
here
is
available
for
development.
As
the
proper
zoning
it
has,
the
proper
land
use.
You
can
build
homes
here
now.
I
It
was
also
a
conservation
easement
that
goes
over
this
entire
property
here,
but
it's
possible
that
we
can
change
that
conservation,
easement
or
a
future
owner
could
change
that
conservation
since
and
there
wouldn't
be
any
big
notices
there
wouldn't
be
orange
signs.
Any
public
meeting
they
would
have
would
be
down
in
Palatka
at
the
Water
Management
District,
and
so
it's
possible
that
this
conservation
could
change
with
very
little
notice
to
the
citizens.
I
By
making
this
change
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
way
we
are
what
it
does
is
it
really
ensures
that
forever.
If
anybody
wants
to
do
anything
with
that
property
that
currently
has
conservations,
even
though
it's
Uplands
it
would
not
be
able
to
be
developed
without
Corner
signs
going
up,
notices
being
placed
in
the
Beach's
leader
or
the
Times
Union,
and
as
a
result,
the
citizens
really
have
an
improved
notice
and
get
to
participate
in
the
process
that
might
have
development
aspirations
for
that
property.
I
Finally,
these
are
the
the
elevations
and
renderings
that
some
of
you
may
have
seen
already
have
hard
copies
as
well,
but
one
of
the
things
here
again
we're
going
to
hold
out
a
piece
of
property
right
here
at
the
corner
for
three
years.
This
is
just
the
architecture
and
dream
of
what
something
might
look
like
here
again.
The
developer
would
like
the
opportunity
to
work
with
the
city
on
developing
this
entry
feature,
it's
obviously
an
iconic
spot.
I
It's
the
first
thing
that
you're
going
to
see
when
you
come
over
over
the
bridge
going
to
the
East,
and
so
the
entry
to
the
city
is
really
important.
What
we're
showing
here
is
that
we're
willing
to
help
participate
in
that
by
donating
the
space
for
our
Landmark,
whether
it's
a
statue
or
or
sign,
we
can
figure
it
out
later.
So
this
is
not
the
thing.
This
is
just
a
graphic
representation
of
what
it
might
look
like.
This
again
is
the
view
coming
kind
of
looking
towards
the
Southwest.
I
Here's
the
pond
in
the
back-
and
you
can
tell
you
know
it's
very
densely
wounded
all
the
way
around.
We
have
the
neighbors
that
live
back
here
in
this
neighborhood
actually
come
onto
the
site
with
us
last
spring.
They
climbed
up
the
ladders,
threw
it
all
the
way
to
the
top
of
the
slides,
because
they.
D
I
I
I
The
lighting,
in
fact,
all
of
the
conditions
or
all
of
the
things
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
later,
that
I
sent
you
emails
about
all
came
out
of
the
neighborhood
meetings,
with
the
exception
of
a
Workforce
and
attainable
housing
which
we're
prepared
to
talk
about
as
well,
and
then
this
is
kind
of
the
the
ground
floor
view
now,
you'll
notice
there
are
no
oak
trees.
In
this
view,
this
was
this.
Drawing
was
done
before
we
had
the
conversation
about
trees
that
play
in
commission,
so
we
could
imagine
a
few
entries
in
there.
I
What
we've
done
is
at
the
fighting
commission's
request.
We
completed
a
tree
survey
for
all
the
trees
that
are
located
behind
the
curb
of
Beach
Boulevard
before
the
parking
lot
and
we've
committed
to
save
the
hardwoods
so
long
as
they
can
be
saved
and
as
long
as
our
infrastructure
doesn't
mess
with
them.
There's
about
nine
or
ten
of
them
that
you'll
see
on
the
survey
I
again
I,
send
it
to
all
of
you
so
that
you
could
look
at
it
before
so.
C
I
I'll,
stop
there
we're
available
to
answer
questions.
We
have
lots
of
materials
and
lots
of
handouts,
anything
that
that
we
want
to
talk
about
we'll
prepare
to
to
address
this.
A
Evening,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Mr,
do
you
know
we'll
go
entry
speaker
cards,
we're
supposed
to
recognize
those
in
favor
of
the
application
first,
but
on
the
on
two
of
them,
I
don't
have
a
and
in
favor
or
a
post
I'm
just
going
to
call
you
and
please
let
us
know:
Mr
Ken
Marsh.
G
Can
we
go
square
area
all
right,
Kenny,
Marsh,
now
playing
commissions,
we
have
all
right,
kenmore's,
2011,
Gail
Avenue
from
day
one
of
this
project
I've
been
an
active
voice
in
making
sure
that
we
had
a
proper
traffic
impact
study
for
this
project
so
that
the
citizens
are
able
to
determine
if
we've
got
the
road
infrastructure
to
take
on
the
800
plus
card.
The
developer
has
been
gracious
enough
to
submit
a
new
traffic
study
yesterday,
indicating
that,
as
the
Steve
has
said,
that
there's
not
a
significant
impact
on
the
traffic.
G
However,
I
I
do
not
believe
that
anyone
in
Council
or
in
our
planning
department
group
has
the
expertise
in
reviewing
traffic
impact
studies
and
modeling,
and
so
I
would
strongly
recommend
that
this
Council
get
an
unbiased
third-party
expert
to
review.
It
summarize
the
study
review
with
the
general
public
and
before
the
next
public
meeting
I,
can
assure
you
as
I
stand
here
that
many
in
the
audience
are
questioning
the
results
of
the
study.
G
I
can
also
assure
you
that
some
doubts
will
always
remain,
even
if
you
get
a
third
party
but
you've
surely
change
more
of
the
minds
of
the
Skeptics.
If
you
do
proceed
this
way
and
surely
create
more
skepticism,
if
you
don't
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
Miss
Kadeem
now
agent
for
the
developer
for
his
Cooperative
Spirit,
there
were
probably
more
asked
in
this
proposal
than
most
and
he
handled
them
all.
G
Very
diplomatic
and
professional
I'd
like
to
also
acknowledge
our
planning
department
for
their
hard
work
and
scrubbing
the
application
he
has
to
plan
comp
plan
in
our
LBC
codes.
I
spent
more
than
my
share
of
time,
looking
at
both
and
I
recognize
that
this
is
an
arduous
and
Herculean
task,
so
I
didn't
put
a
pose
and
I
didn't
put
in
favor
what
I,
what
I
did.
B
G
Exception
to
what's
going
on,
but
I'd
like
to
see
an
unbiased
third-party,
take
a
look
at
that
I
know:
we've
got
the
representative
for
the
state
person
who
did
the
study?
I.
Think
that's
good,
but
I
do
think
it's
unbiased
would
be
good
for
the
citizens.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
Mr
Marsh,
Michelle
Tipton.
C
Good
evening,
233
Azalea
Drive
I
concur
with
the
previous
speaker
in
the
request
for
there
being
an
objective
third-party
review
of
the
traffic
studies.
I
reviewed
it
very
briefly,
and
it
obviously
is
way
over
our
heads
there's
a
couple
things
that
I
found
curious.
C
It's
stating
the
project
will
not
significantly
impact
the
roadways,
but
the
next
sentence
says
the
only
family
segment
is
Penman
Road
and
Beach
Boulevard.
That's
in
my
mind's
eye,
the
most
impacted
area
and
you
all
know
living
at
the
beach
that
area
right
now
without
an
additional
427
units,
you
can't
even
get
into
the
left
turn
lane
to
turn
north
onto
Ben
Penman,
often
at
any
time
of
the
day,
let
alone
during
high
traffic
periods.
So.
C
Look
like
when
you
go
further
down:
Penman
Road
when
you
look
at
night.
I,
do
not
see
anything
in
regards
to
San
Pablo
I,
don't
know
how
you
all
come
home
from
work,
but
if
you're
coming
down
Butler
and
you're
trying
to
get
off
on
Hodges
or
San
Pablo
4
30
to
6
o'clock,
it's
backed
up
on
Butler,
and
it
is
bumper
to
bumper
for
all
this
traffic
heading
east
to
come
to
the
beach
and
that's
where
they're
going
to
be
coming.
C
Where
is
that
information?
And
where
is
the
impact?
Yeah
I
believe
that
that
would
all
of
those
areas
be
negatively
impacted
in
quality
of
life,
be
of
major
concern.
I
also
made
a
phone
call
to
Randy
Gallup
from
Duval
County
school
board,
who
submitted
the
information,
and
he
was
very
very
helpful.
And
if
you
look
at
the
charts
for
the
schools,
it
says
that
they're
not
negatively
impacted.
C
But
when
you
look
at
the
numbers
of
their
estimated
105
students,
which
I
think
is
extremely
low,
it
puts
two
of
the
three
schools
well
over
100
capacity,
the
other
one
at
97
percent.
The
hallways
that
fly
to
the
middle.
Do
not
need
additional
students,
there's
safety
issues,
there's
concerns
already,
with
the
capacity
that
we're
dealing
with
with
Fletcher
High
Fletcher
middle
and
to
throw
an
additional
105
students
into
these
schools.
I
think
is
US
putting
safety
and
a
concern
for
our
schools
right
now.
C
C
A
A
Would
anyone
else
like
to
speak
in
favor,
of
or
in
opposition
to
the
project
that
are
to
the
location
that
has
not
spoken
yet
go
ahead
and
come
on
up
to
the
podium?
Give
us
your
name
and
address
so
three
minutes
to
address
the
council.
B
C
B
B
The
increase
of
people
here
is
not
necessarily
a
bad
thing,
but
when
you
get
to
the
traffic
like
it's
obviously
anyone
who's
lived
here
for
10
period
of
time
has
noticed
that
Now
traffic
I
mean
it's
probably
not
as
much
of
a
concern
to
me
as
some
other
aspects
of
this
I'm
going
to
speak
to
something
a
little
bit
different
than
a
lot
of
people
haven't
I'd
like
to
say
as
much
in
the
data
as
possible.
B
But
this
is
more
of
a
it's
pretty
much
agreed
eventually,
Landing
causes
traffic,
you
put
chopping
Center
is
going
to
cause
traffic
I'm
a
little
bit
more
concerned
about
the
message.
Edison's,
this
continuing
increase
of
density
and
I
think
the
the
goal
of
the
city
up
that,
as
was
shown
earlier,
was
to
increase
the
affordability
or
enable
affordable
housing
for
the
current
future
residents
of
Jacksonville.
Beach
I
understand
that
goal.
It's
not
a
bad
goal,
but
eventually
it's
a
place
where
you
can
build
up
and
you
can
further
increase
density
and
affordable.
B
Housing
is
a
good
thing,
but
also
I'd
like
to
see
people
being
able
to
achieve
the
American
dream
of
actually
owning
a
home.
Instead
of
being
able
to
move
into
an
apartment,
we
have
Apartments
going
up
all
over
the
city
or
everywhere
it
seems
like
every
new
development
is
an
apartment
complex.
We
rarely
see
a
development
of
single
family
homes.
We
can
do
that
about
three
feet
apart
so
I'm
concerned
about
the
future
of
the
city,
not
just
Jacksonville
Beach,
but
all
Duval,
County
and
where
that
goes
from
here.
B
If
we
don't
have
any
aspects
on,
what's
going
to
be
at
a
single
family
subdivision
versus
an
apartment,
complex
versus
a
condo,
there's
just
a
lot
of
different
things
to
do
a
lot
of
different
ways
to
address
that,
but
it's
difficult
I
understand
people
want
more
housing,
I
understand
the
applicant's
goal
to
build
it.
Everyone
wants
to
make
the
most
amount
of
money
that
you
possibly
can
and
I.
Don't
blame
it
for
that.
B
Another
thing
that
you
have
to
think
about
with
the
apartments
versus
home
ownership
is
what
I
don't
think
I've
seen
too
many
negative
apartment
complexes
here
in
terms
of
repair
and
disrepair,
but
it's
just
one
thing
to
think
about,
and
the
clientele
you
know:
are
they
going
to
be?
What
what
type
of
departments
are
they
the
luxury
apartments
or
where
we,
the
question
for
the
applicant
I
guess,
would
be
more
productive,
but
those
are
just
my
concerns
and
I
think
are
shared
by
a
lot
of
people
and
I
appreciate
your
time.
L
Give
me
three
minutes.
Well,
my
name
is
Steven
Hamill
I
live
at
2844
old
Mayport
Road
I've
lived
here.
My
entire
life
I've
worked
with
Jacksonville
rescue
when
I
was
18
years.
Old
I
have
done
a
lot
to
serve
this
community.
It's
really
upsetting
to
see
that
we're
just
stacking
houses
on
houses
and
we're
not
doing
anything
that
attracts
people
to
the
to
the
place.
It's
literally
Adventure
Landing
has
been
such
an
iconic
cleaning.
As
soon
as
you
come
over
the
bridge.
You
see
something
to
do
something
to
bring
your
family
to.
L
We
don't
have
that
anymore.
The
only
thing
that
we
have
that
is
actually
still
around
is
Beach,
Bowl
and
they're.
Thankfully,
revamping
that
it's.
If
it's
we
should
have
done
the
thing,
the
same
thing
to
Adventure
Landing,
the
traffic's
always
going
to
be
there,
but
the
thing
is
that
we
do
not
need
any
more
traffic.
We
don't
need
any
more
students
at
schools.
We
do
not
need
any
more
building
on
top
of
each
other.
L
It's
just
consistent
and
it
doesn't
seem
that
we're
doing
anything
to
give
to
the
community
we're
just
building
to
bring
more
people
in
we're,
making
the
wealth
wealthier
and
then
it's
impossible,
like
this
guy
said
that
we
can't
even
afford
a
single
family
home
and
we
all
are
living
up
in
these
apartments
now,
and
it's
got
to
that
point
where
it's
like.
What
what
are
we
doing?
Why
are
we
making
other
people
wealthy
and
not
bringing
the
wealth
for
our
own
community?
L
And
it's
just
it's
just
one
of
those
things
that
I
feel
very,
very
passionate
about,
because
this
is
something
that
I've
been
able.
I've
been
I've,
been
ready
to
bring
my
child
there
and
now
I
have
a
year
a
year
old
child
right
now,
and
it's
the
saddest
thing
in
the
world
to
think
that
we
won't
have
anything
like
that
anymore
at
the
beaches
and
there's
no
room
to
build
anything
like
that
again,
because
all
of
it's
been
taken
up
by
wealthier
people
that
are
building
to
just
make
themselves
richer.
L
Have
left
except
nothing
but
traffic
and
nothing
but
chaos.
It's
like
my
friend
was
shot
right
in
front
of
the
Surfer
Bar
on
Fourth
of
July,
because
it
was
overcrowded
and
the
cops
did
not
handle
the
situations
out
there.
It's
like
what
do
we
do.
It's
like
I
mean
like
it's
just
gotten
to
the
point
where
it's
so
overwhelming.
It's
like.
Why
are
we?
Why
are
we
allowing
so
much
more
people
to
flood
in
here?
And
it's
like
I
I'm
at
the
point
where
it's
like?
C
And
I
agree
100
with
the
last
three
people,
especially
the
young
man,
that
just
spoke
that
has
so
much
passion
and
put
it
so
well.
We
do
not
need
to
put
other
than
what
you
say
rewards
to
the
people
who
just
try
to
get
the
tax
base
increased.
It
never
works
for
the
citizens.
They
are
never
paying
ahead
of
time
for
the
cost
that
we're
all
going
to
have
to
make
up
more
than
occur.
C
If
you
had
impact
fees
and
they
were
anywhere
near
adequate,
that
might
change
things.
The
last
thing,
I
want
to
say
is
I,
am
100
adamantly
against
getting
any
of
these
guys
to
Developers
grainland
plugs.
It
never
works
for
the
citizens.
Never,
and
it's
a
bad
idea
and
I
hope
you
don't
do
it
and
they
should
be
able
to
play
by
the
rules
that
everybody
else
has
to
do
with
the
zones
it's
here.
C
This
comprehensive
plan
was
worked
hard
on
work
very,
hardly
and
it's
good
and
it
should
be
respected
and
it
should
be
adhered
to.
I
see
no
reason
to
change
the
comprehensive
plan
to
give
them
a
pun
or
increase
density
out
here.
I'm,
not
against
people
making
money
or
having
a
place
to
live,
but
this
is
not
what
this
is
about.
C
D
A
I
Oh
thank
you,
mayor
I
was
going
to
ask
Mr
Kevin
to
come
up
and
talk
about
the
traffic
study,
but
I
think
I'll
win
until
we
get
into
questions
instead
of
talking
about
it.
Now
so
we'll
talk
about
the
traffic
studies.
Some
of
these
questions
puts
out
what
I
really
want
to
address
are
just
a
couple
of
points
that
I
just
feel
compelled
to
talk
about.
I
You
know:
I
know
that
that
Mr
Hamill
is
very
passionate
raving.
The
land
is
just
that's
extremely
derogatory
towards
what's
going
on
here
again
over
the
last
nine
months.
What
we've
done
is
we've
worked
out
a
way
that
we've
done
impact
wise
and
salt
marshes.
We
don't
hurt
the
flood
zone
and
I
guess
what
I
would
say
is
I,
don't
know
really
of
another
developer.
I
I
Last
comment
about
puds
and
why
they're
bad
and
they
always
work
out
poorly
for
the
Neighbors
again
there
are
no
deviations
from
the
code
in
the
PV,
so
we
are
basically
going
with
the
standard
multi-family
zoning
in
our
application
and
what
the
TV
in
this
case
allows
us
to
do.
I
It
allows
us
to
protect
all
the
property,
that's
to
the
South
and
make
sure
that
all
of
this
remains
in
conservation
same
thing
with
this
parcel
over
here,
and
it
also
allows
us
then
to
produce
these
buffers
that
exist
today
or
that
will
exist
and
to
do
the
storm
water
pond
at
the
location
that
we've
shown
on
a
recycling.
The
other
thing
that
PUD
does
is
it.
G
I
Allows
us
to
adopt
conditions
based
on
the
concerns
that
we've
heard
from
the
community,
so
the
other
issues
that
we've
talked
about
lighting
traffic
tree
preservation,
all
those
things.
Those
aren't
easy
to
do
in
Florida
in
a
conventional
zoning,
which
is
why
we
chose
and
we
pursued
a
PUD
so
that
we
could
by
contract,
basically
agree
to
do
things
like
at
the
copy
store
or
add
the
viewing
platform
on
the
walkway.
So.
I
Sometimes
PDS
are
used
to
increase
height
or
increase
setbacks
or
lower
parking
requirements,
or
do
other
AD
uses.
That's
not
what
this
pu
is.
This
PUD
is
merely
being
used
to
address
concerns
that
have
come
from
the
community
and
then
finally,
I
want
to
talk
about
Randy,
gallup's
concerns
and
and
I
think
Miss
Tipton
kind
of
hit
the
nail
on
the
head
when
she
said
that
she
shared
Randy's
opinion
which
isn't
the
state
law.
Randy's
true
opinion,
which
was
shared
with
us
via
email,
is
that
we
comply
with
the
space
actions.
I
He
sent
an
email
to
to
us
into
the
planning
department,
representing
that
this
application
complies
with
state
law.
As
far
as
schools,
there
are
no
school
concurrency
regulations
in
Jacksonville,
Beach,
104
students.
I
just
want
to
remind
you,
is
that's
the
total
amount
that
they
estimate
based
on
the
number
of
units
and
the
unit
types.
Those
would
be
spread
across
all
different
types
of
schools,
Charter
Schools,
private
schools,
public
schools
and
all
different
grades.
I
So
again,
I
appreciate
knowing
what
this
Tipton
said
that
Randy
Gallup
said
about
his
personal
opinion,
but
but
that's
not
really
what's
at
issue
today.
I
What's
an
issue
today
are
the
are
the
state
statutes
and
the
state
rules
and
Mr
Gallup
was
on
record
by
email
to
to
your
staff
about
the
impact
this
project
would
have
on
on
the
schools,
which
is
that
it
would
comply
with
with
the
state
laws
so
and
I
think
I'll
stop
there
and
just
we're
available
to
answer
questions
and
talk
about
the
other
potential
issues
that
we've
identified
throughout
our
conversations
over
the
last
16
months.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
This
hope
hearing
is
closer
before
requesting
a
motion
on
this
ordinance,
beginning
with
myself.
Each
of
the
members
is
requested
to
indicate
for
the
record
both
the
names
of
persons
and
the
substance
of
any
ex
parte
Communications
regarding
the
application
and
ex
parte
communication
refers
to
any
meeting
or
discussion
with
a
person
or
citizen
who
may
have
an
interest
in
this
decision
which
occurred
outside
of
the
public
hearing.
A
I
will
start
and
I
think
we
just
learned
today
that
we
need
to
make
an
additional
effort
to
ensure
that
the
city
clerk
receives
emails
that
are
addressed
to
us
individually.
I
didn't
have
a
chance
to
do
that.
Thank
you,
jury
duty
today,
but
I
do
know.
I
received
several
from
Miss,
Valerie,
Britt
and
I
will
go
back
and
check
any
others
and
make
sure
that
the
city
clerk
has
a
copy
of
them.
A
I
also
met
with
Mr
David
L
last
week,
and
I
will
also
get
you
that
exact
date
and
the
primary
discussion
was
the
discussion
at
the
Planning
Commission
and
it
changes
and
things
that
we'll
talk
about,
probably
under
under
the
Pud
discussion.
With
regards
to
the
application,
Mr
Stokes.
K
Oh
yes,
thank
you,
received
several
emails
from
the
applicant's
leaving
now
forwarded
those
to
the
city
clerk
already
I
had
breakfast
with
Mr
Diva.
Now
a
good
call
looking
up
to
date
on
10-5
and
we
discussed
the
project,
the
changes
and
the
recommendations,
such
as
the
traffic
survey
and
tree
study
from
the
Planning,
Commission
and
I
believe
according
to
miss
Robinson's
email.
That
is
the
only
substantive
ex
parte
Communications.
F
Well,
okay,
I,
don't
feel
special
but
yeah
same
as
everybody
else,
but
when
I
met
with
Mr
debenow,
it
was
also
he
also-
and
this
has
been
I
guess
the
last
year
and
a
half
since
we
first
started
talking
about
this
I've
been
pressing
for
Workforce
housing
and
access
to
the
environmental
areas
for
the
public
on
that
property.
G
Excuse
me:
I
have
also
had
a
communication
Mr
Steve
doing
now
through
emails
received
one
today
and
yesterday
with
new
changes.
We
went
to
breakfast
on
October
4th
and
he
presented
the
new
commitments
and
stuff
that
he
did.
I
received
emails
from
Valerie
Britt
and
Mr
Ken
Marsh
Mr
Nichols.
Thank
you.
It's
going
to
declare
a
possibly.
B
I've
met
over
the
last
year,
with
Mr
demon
out
twice
and
received
the
same
emails
that
everybody
else
has
I
will
forward
them
to
the
to
the
city
other
than
that
I
have
received
other
emails,
but
they're
not
part
of
srk
communication
because
they're
citizens,
but
we
talk
about
the
traffic
study
of
a
civil
engineer,
so
I
reviewed
it
in
depth.
I
I
feel
comfortable
with
it.
As
a
professional
engineer
and
a
professional
engineer,
signing
off
on
those
I
have
a
substantial
confidence
in
the
analysis
that
was
done
with
it.
B
We
talked
about
the
lighting
of
the
trees.
The
just
impact
overall
to
the
to
the
public
and
I
was
very
concerned
about
the
conservation
lands,
and
you
know
the
way
the
Pud
was
developed
in
order
to
be
able
to
retain
and
commit
more
land
of
conservation.
So
those
are
the
main
things.
That's
what
we're
talking
about?
B
I
also
met
with
Mr
demon,
Allen
I
think
it
was
October,
4th,
I,
believe
and,
and
he
pretty
much
the
changes
that
he
presented
today.
He
presented
to
me
on
that
date.
We
did
have
an
additional
discussion
about
affordable
housing
and
what
that
looked
like
in
this
project.
I've
also
received
emails
from.
E
Ken
Marsh
and
Valerie
Brooks
office
I
also
met
with
Mr.
Do
you
now
July
20th?
And
at
that
point
we
were
just
talking.
He
provided
an
update
on
what
was
going
on
with
the
project,
which
consisted
of
reassurance
that
it
would
not
in
the
project
would
not
impact
Wetlands
that
they
were
working
on
getting
certification
from
FEMA
on
the
land.
It's
not
in
the
flood
zone
and
a
brief
discussion
about
what
he
thought
the
psych
plan
might
might
consist
of
October
14th
we
met
again.
E
He
we
discussed
concerns
that
the
community
has
with
the
number
of
units
we
also
discussed,
affordable
housing,
the
traffic
study
and
or
the
fact
that
he
was
working
on
getting
a
traffic
study
because
we
didn't
have
it
at
the
time
and
he
also
discussed
public
benefit
of
the
proposed
development
and
then,
as
everyone
else,
I've
received
emails
from
Steve
with
the
proposed
amendment,
tree
survey
and
traffic
study
and
all
forward
goes
to
the
city.
Clerk
and
I've
also
received
emails
from
several
citizens:
But
Ken,
Marsh
and
Valerie
Britt,
most
recently
as
well.
B
A
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second
before
opening
the
floor
for
discussion
or
questions
by
the
council.
Please
be
reminded
that
our
decision
will
be
based
on
the
criteria
set
forth
in
the
Land
Development
code
staff's
report,
the
recommendation
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
public
input
at
all
hearings
we'll
open
the
floor
for
discussion,
Mr
Jansen.
B
Mr
Diva
Can:
you
can
you
talk
them
or
expand
more
on
affordable
housing,
because
I
feel
like
this.
That's
one
of
the
problems
that
we're
suffering
here
in
our
city
and
we
have
I
talked
to
a
different
department-
has
just
to
find
out
how
the
employees
never
mind
just
the
averages
and
teachers,
at
least
when
that
kind
of
thing
are
being
able
to
afford
to
live
in
Jax,
Beach
and
I.
Think
that
you're
addressing
this
problem
to
a.
I
Certain
degree
sure
so
I'm
going
to
address
that
just
remind
everybody
procedurally,
where
we
are
so
we're
on
the
the
conference
plan,
which
is
2022,
81
81
and
the
way
that
affordable
housing
kind
of
ties
into
that
conversation
is
regarding
the
public
benefit.
There.
I
In
your
comprehensive
plan
that
basically
says
when
an
applicant
asks
to
remove
Recreation
and
open
space
from
the
comprehensive
plan,
it
has
to
be
outweighed
by
the
public
benefit
and
in
the
presentation
I
gave
earlier
this
evening.
If
you
count
them
up,
there's
about
18
reasons
why
there
is
a
public
benefit
to
doing
that,
2.75
acre,
swap
which
I
showed
on
this
map
here
and
replaced
it
with
all
the
conservation.
It
was
about
17
or
18
reasons,
embedded
in
that
presentation
and.
I
In
order
to
further
implement
the
housing
policy
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
we're
offering
to
to
include
some
affordable
housing
in
accordance
with
Florida
sections
and
I
decided
that
the
statute
I
sent
everybody
copies
of
that
before
the
meeting
I
think
that
the
appropriate
place
to
actually
put
that
condition
would
be
on
the
resume
which
is
in
the
next
hearing,
which
is
on
2022
8182.
However,
it
does
tie
in
if
that
condition
is
adopted
or
something
regarding
affordable
housing
is
adopted.
I
I
What
we
propose
is,
rather
than
making
up
our
own,
affordable
housing
definition
or
making
up
a
a
plan
to
provide
affordable
housing.
We
went
through
the
Florida.
Statutes
spoke
with
lots
of
experts
in
that
area,
and
it
seems
like
the
easiest
way
to
do
that
is
to
tie
our
division
of
affordable
housing
to
the
state
statute,
which
is
400.0004
that
defines
what
types
of
Housing
and
what
income
fans
constitute
affordable
or
Workforce
or
attainable
housing,
depending
on
what
word
you
need.
I
Again,
this
isn't
saying
that
there's
going
to
be
vouchers,
this
isn't
saying
that
there's
going
to
be
section,
8.
HUD
just
happens
to
be
the
entity
that
studies,
rents
and
rent
levels
and
publishes
rents
based
on
attainable
and
Workforce
housing.
So
I
know
this
is
a
long
answer,
but
that
table
what
we're
saying
is
would
be
adopted
as
it's
updated
periodically
and
that
that
actually
shows
you
how
rents
would
be
governed
within
different
income
bands
number
of
people
in
each
family
and
then
the
number
of
veterans
in
each
unit.
I
Again,
that
whole
process
is
one
we
don't
have
to
make
up.
We
can
refer
to
the
statute
and
it
picks
up
all
those
things
that
I
just
listed
and
that's
how
we
would
implement
it.
It's
a
very
long
answer.
No,
no!
That's.
B
Good
I
appreciate
all
the
work
that
you've
put
into
this
and
taken
into
consideration
of
the
community
input
that
they've
provided
over
the
past
almost
a
year
now
or
over
a
year.
Now
so,
and
the
other
thing
that
kind
of
bothered
me
tonight
was.
B
It
was
stated
that
they
won't
put
that
some
wanted.
An
unbiased.
I
C
You
know
in
every
super
technical
area
you
can.
K
H
I
In
accordance
with
his
license
that
he's
prepared
it
in
accordance
with
an
industry
standard
industry
standards,
and
so
he
references
his
sources.
You
know
again
if
there
was
a
way
to
I'm
sure
there
are
travel
studies
that
are
shaped
one
way
or
another,
but
the
answer
to
the
question
short
than
that,
but
it's
not
biased.
Thank
you.
E
Either
Heather
or
we
can
now,
you
know
we
heard
tonight
I
the
the
thing
that
I
keep
hearing
from
people
is
the
size,
the
development.
As
far
as
the
number
of
units
which
leads
to
you
know
how
many
cars
we're
going
to
have
on
our
roads
and
and
the
concerns
you
know,
with
the
increase,
essentially
The,
increased
density
and
then
concerns
about
changing
our
comp
plan
and
that
sort
of
thing.
So
my
question
is
how
many
units
could
be
built
without
the
comp
plan.
Amendment.
I
Do
we
know
well
well,
okay,
so
today,
here
there's
about
13.87
acres
of
land
that
has
planned
commercial,
Community,
commercial
and
under
that
category
you
can
develop
40
acres
per
unit.
I'm.
Sorry,
this
front.
This
top
part
is
about
7.9,
Acres
I'm.
Sorry,
not
the
entire
piece.
This
rectangle
at
the
top
is
7.98
Acres,
that
7.98
acres
is
planned,
Community,
commercial
and
under
that
comprehensive,
planned
designation,
I'm
trying
to
find
a
different
slide.
That
shows
it
anyway
under
that
I
guess
this.
Does
it
that
portion
right
there
under
that
category?
I
I
E
B
I
C
I
Again,
not
it's
not
required
this.
This.
This
edition
of
affordable,
Workforce
housing,
affordable
housing,
is
completely
in
response
to
what's
going
on
in
the
Greater
Community
today,
there's
nothing
under
code
that
requires
it.
It's
a
concern
that
we're
shared
and
we're
trying
to
be
a
part
of
the
solution.
As
you
know,
the
property
owner
owns
a
lot
of
property
in
Jacksonville
Beach.
He
really
wants
Jacksonville
Beach
to
succeed.
I
I
If
you
do
fewer
units,
you
get,
you
do
fewer
percentage,
but
practically
speaking
what
what
I'm
saying
is
that
at
427
units
we
can
do
about
five
percent
of
those
units,
as
within
the
state
statute,
which
is
about
20
units,
which
is
20
more
than
is
required
under
your
code
or
your
comprehensive
plan.
Just
to
try
and
be
a
part
of
the
solution.
B
B
I've
seen
a
lot
of
stuff
that
I
feel
is
inaccurate
in
in
the
local
newspaper
and
everything
else
saying
that
they
they
voted
against
it.
Can
you
please
clarify
that
and
also
discuss
a
little
more
in
depth,
what
the
the
the
cities,
what
staffs
you
know?
Finding
is
and
but
the
first
the
planning
one.
J
Sure,
thank
you.
Councilman
Nichols,
yes,
you're,
you're,
absolutely
right.
The
Planning
Commission
did
unfortunately
fail
to
make
a
recommendation.
J
I
do
believe
that
they
just
wanted
a
little
bit
more
information
before
doing
that,
but
many
of
the
things
they
were
asking
for
aren't
things
that
the
applicant
is
required
to
provide
to
us
either
at
that
stage
or
at
all.
So
this
level
of
detailed
traffic
analysis
they
wanted
it.
It's
not
required,
but
we,
you
know
they
did,
go
and
get
that
done
on
the
tree
survey
as
well.
That's
not
required.
J
B
Thank
you
and
I
have
more
questions
for
the
a
traffic
engineer
about
Penman
Road.
It
actually
is
part
to
you
Heather
too,
that
obviously
the
capacity
of
Penman
Road
is
is
deficient.
My
understanding
at
the
city
of
Jacksonville
is
in
the
process
of
completely
rebuilding
that
road
and
and
widening
it
to
increase
some
level
of
capacity
on
it,
and
so
the
two
questions
is
the
impact
that
we
will
have
on
Penman
Road.
Do
we
know
if
there's
going
to
be
a
this
additional
traffic?
B
How
it's
going
to
impact
that
and
then
sorry,
the
engineer,
sorry
for
internet,
but
talk
about
the
level
of
service
of
Beach
Boulevard
in
that
area.
I
mean
I.
I
live
a
couple
blocks
from
that
location,
so
obviously
I'm
concerned
about
it
as
well.
Yeah.
J
And
I'll
I'll
speak
a
little
bit
to
that
and
then
I'll
turn
that
over
Jacksonville
Beach
doesn't
participate
in
concurrency
of
roadways
any
longer,
so
Penman
is
already
a
failing
Road,
as
we
all
know,
it's
failing
at
PM
peak
hours
for
traffic.
If.
J
But
it
is
operating
that
way
during
the
PM
peak
hours
of
traffic
you
mentioned,
Jacksonville
is
working
on
that
we
can
certainly
provide
any
information
to
the
Jacksonville
engineers
and
consulting
firm
who's
working
on
that
kind
of
road
project.
But
since
we
don't
participate
in
concurrency
we're
not
looking
to
kind
of
penalize
the
applicant.
E
F
J
Project,
if
you
will
for
wanting
to
develop
their
property,
saying,
okay,
well,
the
road
doesn't
have
any
more
capacity,
so
you
can't
build
in
2013
Council
adopted
the
mobility
fee
program,
which
I
think
you
guys
are
mostly
familiar
with,
where
the
applicant
will
have
to
pay
into
our
Mobility
fee
program.
That
money
goes
into
multimodal
Transportation
facility,
infrastructure
and
Improvement.
So
things
like
Urban,
journal's,
master
plan
implementation,
bike,
racks
bike
pitch
have
sidewalks
things
like
that,
so
we
know
we're
not
going
we're,
not
growing
New
Roads
in
Jax
Beach.
We
have
what
we
have.
J
Our
main
arterials
are
not
ours
to
do
anything
with
anyone.
They
belong
to
the
state
where,
in
the
case
of
Heaven
Jacksonville,
the
transportation
study
is,
is
great
data.
But
again
it's
not
something
we're
going
to
look
at
and
say
well,
this
road
is
failing,
so
the
developer
has
to
do
something
about
it,
especially
when
it
when
it
is
already
failing-
and
we
know,
Jacksonville's
looking
at
it
already
so
I'll.
Let
you
add
any
information
you
want
to
share.
L
Jeff
Graham
and
Amy
Clemson
Miller
14775
Old,
Saint,
Augustine
Road
as
far
as
pending.
What
the
city
is
looking
at
is
a
contact.
L
Solution,
they're,
not
gonna,
you
know
it
exceeds
the
capacity
of
a
four-lane,
interrupted
flow
facility.
They're
not
going
to
build
floor
planes.
It
doesn't
make
sense
for
the
area
for
the
people
and.
L
For
an
hour
in
the
morning,
and
maybe
an
hour
in
the
afternoon,
there's
some
delay,
but
they
called
it
interrupted
flow,
which
is
basically
a
couple
signals.
A
mile
you've
got
a
signal
at
Beach
and
then
you
almost
have
to
go
up
in
that
boom
beach
before
you
hit
any
other
ones.
So
it's
uninterrupted
to
fall
in
the
middle,
so
it
actually
does
work
when
the
engineering
firm
that
is
looking
at
the
road
started.
Looking
at
a
historical
traffic
data
traffic
on
Penman
Road
has
been
decreasing
for
the
last
10
years.
They.
F
Mr
one
thank
you
to
speak
to
the
comp
plan
Amendment,
if
that's
what
we're
focusing
on
it.
These
are
great
questions,
but
I
want
to
I'll
ask
these
questions
and
get
into
that
stuff
when
we
get
to
the
Pud.
But
as
far
as
the
comp
plan
Amendment,
it's
the
in
the
planning
director's
report.
It
said
that
those
two
little
pieces,
the
parking
lots
in
the
back
and
1996
that
they
were
changed,
that
they
were
changed
from
high
density
and
low
density
to
the
to
residential
Rec
open
space.
F
So
it's
not
like
they
were
always
Rec
opening
open
space
or
just
open
space.
They
were
blaming.
The
comp
plan
was
developed.
They
were
there
for
development,
and
so
that
just
gave
me
a
a
little
bit
more
comfort
in
that.
Also
your
your
note
that
these
changes
are
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan
as
a
whole.
They
are
these
changes.
The
change
for
the
small
plan
development
helps
to
achieve
what
the
comprehensive
plan
as
a
whole
is
trying
to
achieve.
F
So
I
understand
the
concern,
but
I
think
of
the
concern
that
I'm
hearing
out
there.
It
has
far
more
to
do
with
the
HUD
than
the
than
the
comp
plan,
so
I
I
personally
will
support
the
chain
for
the
comp
plan,
considering
what
the
how
it
was
changed
in
the
past
and
we're
kind
of
changing
it
back
to
that.
A
K
I
just
wanted
to
thank
Heather
for
clarifying
to
councilman
Naples
point
that
the
PC
failed
to
make
a
recommendation,
because
that
was
a
little
confusing
to
me.
We
received
an
email
from
Miss
Robinson
and
then
the
briefing
had
it
a
little
bit
confused
and
then,
like
I'm
sure
everybody
had
seen
several
news
reports
of
it
even
more
confusing.
K
So
thank
you
for
clarifying
that.
But
the
one
question
he
asked
that
I
didn't
that
we
got
kind
of
tied
up
with
that.
It
didn't
really
get
answered,
was
just
to
go
into
detail
on
the
staff
recommendation
on
the
approval.
J
Sure,
thank
you,
councilman
Stokes
and
I
apologize.
If
I
didn't
answer
all
the
questions.
Yes,
staff
did
recommend
to
the
Planning
Commission
approval
because
we
did
find
the
land
use,
change
consistent
with
the
rest
of
the
comp
plan,
and
by
that
I
mean
we
did
not
feel
like
it
was
in
violation
of
any
other
policies.
Originally,
we
did
have
concerns
as
I
stated
regarding
development,
the
flood
plain-
and
you
know,
protection
of
wetlands
and
the
applicant
went
to
Great
Lengths
to
try
to
meet
those
concerns
of
staff.
A
J
Oh,
thank
you
ma'am.
The
only
thing
I'll
add
that,
if,
if
there
are
any
conditions
that
you're
considering
that
this
obviously
is
the
appropriate
place
to
put
those.
D
A
It
is
the
duty
of
the
council
to
arrive
at
sound
decisions
regarding
the
use
of
property
within
the
city.
This
includes
receiving
citizen
input
regarding
the
proposed
use
on
the
neighborhood,
especially
where
the
input
is
fact-based
and
not
simply
an
expression
of
opinion.
It
is
the
applicant's
burden
to
demonstrate
that
their
application
is
consistent
with
the
Land
Development
code
and
the
comprehensive
plan.
A
If
the
applicant
is
successful
and
showing
consistency
than
it
is
up
to
the
local
government
to
produce
confident
substantial
evidence
of
record
that
the
application
should
be
denied,
the
council's
decision
on
a
zoning
Amendment
application
is
based
on
the
criteria
set
forth.
In
section
34-211,
the
Land
Development
code,
each
member
of
the
council
has
been
provided
a
copy
of
the
criteria.
In
addition,
the
council
has
received
a
copy
of
the
application
and
the
staff
and
planning
commission
reports
on
this
PUD
zoning
Amendment
request.
I
will
now
open
the
public
hearing
aid
ordinance,
number
2022-8182.
A
Would
be
applicant
or
a
spokesperson
for
the
applicant
like
to
make
a
presentation
or
any
additional
information?
Thank
you
now
we'll
announce
the
opening
of
hearing
for
of
the
hearing
for
testimony
from
other
interested
parties.
I
do
not
have
any
additional
cards
that
would
open
a
floor.
If
anybody
additionally
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
application,
would
anyone
like
to
speak
in
opposition
up
to
the
application?
A
Anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
for
or
against
the
application,
City
attorney
or
the
director
of
Planning
and
Development
wish
to
respond
to
any
of
the
comments
by
the
applicant
or
the
public,
since
there
were
none?
Probably
not,
and
applicants
probably
also
doesn't
need
to
respond.
At
this
point,
this
public
hearing
is
closed
before
requesting
a
motion
on
this
ordinance,
beginning
with
myself.
Each
of
the
members
is
requested
to
indicate
for
the
record
both
the
names
of
persons
and
the
substance
of
any
experts
in
Communications.
A
B
C
A
Discussion
or
questions
by
the
council
please
be
reminded
that
our
decision
will
be
based
on
the
criteria
set
forth
in
the
Land
Development
code,
and
the
council
is
required
to
approve
a
clear
statement
of
specific
findings.
Findings
of
facts
stating
the
basis
upon
which
such
facts
were
determined
and
the
decision
was
made.
I'll
now
open
the
floor
for
discussion
by
council
members,
foreign.
G
Northwest
corner
for
the
welcome
to
Jacksonville
Beach
Veterans
if
we
were
to
go
forward,
obviously
I'm
very
interested
in
that,
because
I
think
when
it
comes
to
Jack
speech,
you
will
have
a
an
entrance.
That's
going
to
be
captured
the
people
visiting
here
so
I
hope
in
the
future.
When
we
talk
about
this
sign
that
we
can
make
it
to
our
core
values
and
matches
what
Jacksonville
Beach
has
around
the
city
with
the
surfboards
and
the
water
towers.
I
Etc
et
cetera
councilman.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
it.
If
I
could
mayor,
if
I
could
just
approach
what
I've
done
is
I've
printed
out
on
separate
pieces
of
paper,
the
the
email
that
I
sent
you
so
that
we
can
all
be
looking
at
the
same
information
and
so
I,
don't
know,
procedurally
how
you
want
to
take
it
up,
but
since
councilman
has
a
talked
about
the
entry
sign,
I
thought
I
would
just
pass
that
out.
If
that
would
be
okay.
C
I
To
your
your
question,
we
we
agree.
We
would
want
something
to
be
iconic.
It's
a
great
entry
feature
that
not
only
matches
the
aesthetic
of
the
of
the
of
the
of
the
the
mixed-use
community
center.
K
I
Also
matches
the
aesthetic
of
Jacksonville
Beach,
so.
I
Written
here
is
again
in
my
effort
and
there's
no
pride
of
authorship,
but
it's
my
effort
to
basically
say
what
we're
trying
to
do,
and
so
we
would
make
the
land
available.
I
won't
read
it
to
you,
but
that's
basically
what
we
were
proposing
so
at
the
appropriate
time
of
you,
wanted
to
make
a
motion
or
take
a
promotion
to
add
this
to
the
legislation
we
put
it
in
writing.
So
everyone
could
read
from
the
same
piece
of
paper.
I
A
A
F
Fine,
thank
you,
so
I
have
a
good
studio.
Now
they
have
we've.
Had
this
conversation
yeah
a
lot
of
these
conversations
for
a
long
time
now,
and
my
one
of
my
big
concerns
is
affordable
housing
if
the
beach-
it's
something
that's
noted
in
the
comp
plan.
It's
something
that's
noted.
On
our
strategic
plan.
We
realize
that
people
who
work
here
cannot
live
here
and
that
I
think
is
problematic
if
we
want
to
actually
have
a
diverse
Community.
F
F
The
cost
of
rent
has
increased
up
to
36
percent
for
an
efficiency
apartment
32
for
a
one
bedroom,
28
for
a
two
bedroom
27
or
a
three
bedroom
and
25
for
a
four
bedroom
with
a
four
bedroom
rents
now
are
about
2400
a
month.
So
if
you
take
that
data
and
then
you
look
at
the
HUD
table
that
you've
provided
that
would
bring
I
would
argue
that
the
bracket
to
more
affordable
housing
should
fall
between
the
45
to
80
percent.
F
If
you
look
at
that's,
that's
a
little
less
than
half
of
their
annual
income
that
would
go
to
towards
rent
and
I
think
that
is
the
missing
middle.
When
we're
looking
at
our
our
data
and
if
you
want,
you
can
look
at
all
of
that
stuff.
F
F
F
I
don't
know
if
I
want
to
talk
about
this
whole
review.
Okay,
so
you're
currently
asking
for
427
units,
and
we
both
know
that
that
is
not
a
number
that
is
tickling
people
in
a
positive
way.
So
I'd
also
like
to
see
that
number
drop
below
before
so
it
could
possibly
go
toward
more
towards
385
and
I
do
understand
that
the
developer
does
need
to
make
sure
that
the
numbers
work,
but
that
385
I
would
say
10
of
those
units
would
be
the
affordable
with
the
percentage
income
bracket
percentage.
F
To
note
some
of
the
concerns
earlier
about
Adventure
Landing
at
being
a
park,
that's
a
wonderful
idea
and
we
turn
it
into
a
city
park.
We
can
turn
it
into
a
water
park.
We
can
do
anything
if
you
are
willing
to
pay
the
tax
increase
for
the
city
to
purchase,
that
property
at
market
value
and
then
upkeep
the
property
over
time
and.
C
F
That
is
something
that
the
residents
of
Jacksonville
Beach
are
willing
to
do,
that.
That
might
be
an
Avenue
that
we
would
look
at,
but
that
would
not
be
an
inexpensive
ass
on
the
residents
of
Jacksonville
Beach
I
see
this
as
a
a
viable
solution
and
adding
I
I
see
this
as
a
viable
solution.
It
IT
addresses
some
of
the
problems
that
we
currently
have
with
housing
and
I.
F
Also,
we've
also
discussed
making
sure
that
the
the
walkway
the
viewing
Tower
is
built
in
such
a
way
that
it's
easily
connected
to
the
urban
trail
system.
We've
discussed
my
concern
with
all
the
financial
changes
and
the
economic,
the
economic
concerns
of
the
country
of
the
world
right
now,
I,
don't
know
if
the
three
years
is
a
viable
option
for
us
we'll
be
able
to
stop
putting
the
money
into
our
urban
trail
system.
So
I
have
asked
for
a
little
bit
of
extension.
F
I
do
understand
that
when
the
project
is
down,
the
project
is
done,
and
it's
not
beneficial
for
you
to
try
and
bring
everybody
back
out
to
get
that
viewing
platform
out
there.
So
if,
in
the
amendments
to
this
HUD
that
we
also
include
that
viewing
platform
to
be
construction
constructed
in
place
in
such
a
way
where
there's
minimal
connection
needed
to
for
the
city
to
connect
into
it
with
its
urban
trail
system,
those
are
some
of
the
things
that
I'll
be
remote.
F
Motioning
and
I
did
want
to
just
note
one
more
piece.
One
of
the
things
that
we
are
up
here
are
trying
to
do
is
balance
residence
rights
along
with
the
property
rights
of
the
individual
who
owns
that
property.
They
have
the
right
to
do
certain
things
with
that
property,
regardless
of
Heather,
and
the
traffic
study
guide,
who
I
providers
where
they
noted
that
it's
the
an
applicant
cannot
be
penalized
for
Thoreau.
F
So
taking
that
into
consideration,
I
think
that
we,
we
are
in
the
best
position
right
now
to
compromise
in
a
way
where
the
city
can
get
the
best
benefit
for
the
residents.
It's
not
going
to
be
perfect.
It's
not
going
to
be
what
you
all
hope.
F
It's
not
what
you
hope
all
I
could
be,
but
compromise
give
and
take,
and
so
this
is
the
chance
for
us
to
get
that
give
and
take
have
it
attached
to
the
flood,
and
this
way
we
know
that
their
hands
are
now
tied
to
any
any
final
approval
of
the
bud
whatever
it
is
going
to
look
like.
I
I
Generally,
just
south
of
this
of
this
Pond.
You
can
kind
of
see
it
right
here
below
that
that
building
actually
I'm
sorry
yeah
right
right
here
on
probably
this
building.
So
this
this,
what
I've
done
here
is
I've
made
in
the
condition
which
I'll
hand
that
out
in
just
a
moment
too,
I'll
give
it
to
the
court
right
after
I
get
done
speaking.
K
I
That
means
that
the
city
wouldn't
be
incurring
across,
for
example,
to
turn
north
and
go
back
up
to
our
property
or
go
way
far
out
into
the
anyway,
so
that
that's
the
thinking
anyway,
on
the
on
the
viewing
platform
of
the
boardwalk,
we
pull
it
down,
perpendicular
with
shutter,
and
we
use
our
commercially
reasonable
efforts
to
provide
easement
and
help
with
permitting
on
that
as
to
the
number
of
units.
I
This
will
be
something
that
we'll
talk
about
more
later,
but
again,
the
the
427
units,
the
maximum
density
on
this
site,
given
this
number
of
acres
is
I,
think
436
units,
so
we're
not
asking
for
the
maximum
we're
asking
for
something
a
little
bit
less,
but
that
number
40
units
an
acre
is
not
one
that
we
made
up.
That's
out
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
So
we
feel
like
the
427
is
something
that's
well
within
our
writes
well,
within
the
comprehensive
plan's
vision
for
for
this
type
of
development.
I
J
B
K
I
It
costs
the
same
to
build
the
unit,
whether
it's
an
affordable
unit
or
a
market
rate,
and
if
we've
been
having
this
conversation
a
year
ago,
I
probably
would
have
had
a
lot
more
flexibility
on
the
unit
account,
but
with
interest
rates,
materials,
delay,
scheduling,
inflation.
I
Frankly,
just
finding
a
contractor,
that's
going
to
build
something
like
this
I
have
a
lot
less
room
available,
because
every
unit
that's
lost
is
one.
That's
really
critical.
Now,
in
order
to
deliver
the
project
but
I'm
not
saying
that
we
won't
go
down
the
number
of
units,
I'm
saying
that
I
wanted
one
to
just.
Please
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
talk
about
it.
The
very
last
component
that
you
mentioned
was
about
the
income
bans
and
where
people
fall
in
those
inconvenience.
I
C
I
I
Know
why
that
is.
But
if
you
look
at
the
most
recent
census,
data
Jacksonville,
they
just
don't
have
a
lot
of
kids
in
the
households
and
and
so
it'll
probably
be
a
lot
of
one
and
two
bedroom
units.
Probably
not
no.
H
I
Is
certainly,
and
if
there
are
threes
will
be
very,
very
few
and
the
income
bans
the
way
that
it
reads
is
that
it
is
for
people
up
to
a
percentage.
So
the.
I
Written
somebody,
that's
a
ten
percent
or
twenty
percent
would
be
somebody
who's
under
120.
So
anyone
in
the
bands
the
way
that
we've
proposed
it
would
be
eligible
whether
there
are
2100
80,
60
40,
whatever
it
may
be.
What
I'll
be
talking
about
later
is
that
we
really
allow
the
market
to
figure
out
where
those
people
come
in,
because.
C
I
I
Sets
an
appropriate
framework
when
we
get
down
to
you
know
you
need
I'm
just
making
some
five
minutes
for
people
at
45
units
for
people
at
six,
even
five
for
people
at
80..
That
really
makes
it
more
challenging
to
administer,
and
so
we
I
will
be
talking
later
about
leading
the
band.
You
know,
probably
in
the
80
to
120
range,
but
obviously
I've
been
to
the
conversation
on
the
role
of
the
Council
on
on
that
as
well.
I'll
pass
out
the
affordable
housing
item.
I
E
Okay,
thank
you,
Mr
Nichols
I.
You
know
I
I,
like
a
lot
of
the
things
that
Miss
Dumont
said
as
I
as
Mr.
Diva
now
knows
in
our
discussion.
We
talked
a
lot
about
the
units,
the
number
of
units
and
and
that's
why
I
asked
the
question
about
what
could
be
built
with
without
the
comp
plan.
Amendment
319
still
seems
like
a
lot,
but
obviously
that's
something
that
they
could
do
by
right.
I
as
I
understand
it
is
that
correct,
yeah.
J
Thank
you
for
your
question.
Yes,
under
the
land
use,
they
could
do
multi-family
by
right.
They
would
have
to
change
the
zoning
to
do
that
as
well.
As
was
mentioned
earlier,
oh
okay,.
E
So
I'm
sorry,
this
is
getting
confusing.
E
So
I
I
like
the
idea
of
the
10
that
are
affordable.
If
there's
any
way
that
I
would
like
to
just
add
my
two
cents
there
to
Mr,
Juvenile
and
and
and
the
reduction
of
units
to
385.
If
that's
possible,
I
I
would
appreciate
that
being
investigated.
E
As
far
as
the
concerns
with
traffic-
and
there
was
someone
who
mentioned
that
that
you
know
that
there
are
no
impact
fees
but
with
the
mobility
fee
is
really
going
to
be
like
an
impact
fee
is
that
correct
was
Ireland,
and
so,
when
you
and
I
spoke
earlier
today,
you
said
that
that
would
actually
be
a
sizable
fee.
Is
that
correct?
J
So
the
the
fee
is
determined
by
a
bunch
of
math
which
I
love.
It's
basically
taking
the
trips
that
are
are
estimated
to
be
generated
from
the
project
and
do
this
like
I,
said
this
whole
math
problem
and
figuring
out.
We
do
internally
based
on
projects
we
have
planned
in
the
CIP
for
next
year,
with
the
cost
of
those
improvements
are
going
to
be,
and
then
we
assign
basically
a
value
to
each
trip
added
to
our
our
Network.
J
So
I
don't
have
that
number
for
23,
yet
we're
still
working
on
it
as
we
go
through
the
budget,
pull
out
those
projects
for
urban
Trails,
sidewalks
bike,
racks,
Etc
and
coming
up
with
that
Mobility
key
right
now
for
22,
it's
50
a
trip
so
multiply
that
times
the
2500
trips
they're,
adding
it
is
a
sizable
amount.
I
do
expect
that
number
to
go
up
I.
Just
don't
have
that
number
ready.
J
So,
yes,
there
will
be
a
sizable
impact
on
our
Mobility
fee
that
we
can
then
turn
around
and
use
for
some
of
these
pedestrian
and
bicycle
and
Transit
oriented
did
projects
and
infrastructure.
Okay
and.
E
I'd
like
to
I'd
like
to
just
mention
that
I
do
appreciate
all
the
work
that
Mr
Diva
now
has
done
as
far
as
the
proposed
amendments
that
are
kind
of
going
around
us
right
now,
but
because
obviously
you're
listening
to
what
people
are
saying
and
I
do
appreciate
that
so
I'd
like
to
again
the
the
affordable
housing,
the
workforce,
housing
very
important,
very
important
part
of
that
our
community.
Getting
some
kind
of
benefit.
I
do
also
appreciate,
what's
being
done
with
the
PD
and
I'm,
not
a
huge
fan
of
PDs,
but
I.
E
Think
Ms
Fisher
will
remember
the
the
Home
Depot
project
and
how
that
PUD.
There
were
a
lot
of
conditions
that
were
placed
on
it
which
actually
made
that
project,
even
though
it
was
something
that
the
community
was
not
real
thrilled
about
made
it
a
much
better
pill
to
swallow,
and
so
my
hope
is
that
we
know
that
Adventure
Landing
isn't
going
to
it
isn't
going
to
continue.
E
But
if,
if
we're
going
to
have
something
developed
there,
that
we
have
conditions
placed
on
it,
that
will
make
it
a
better
project
for
for
the
community
and
the
conservation
piece
of
what
you're
proposing
to
do
with
the
comp
plan.
Amendment
and
the
Pud
I
think
is
a
very,
very
important
piece
of
this
project
too,
and
I
want
to
thank
you
for
that.
So
I
I'd
like
for
us
to
go
ahead
and
work
through
some
of
these
proposed
amendments,
because
I
do
think
that
they
are
are
good.
Amendments
and
I
do
support
them
all.
C
C
B
Thank
you,
mayor
Hoffman,
the
I
said
a
question
about
the
viewing
platform,
actually
not
that
one
of
the
sign
it's
designated,
that
the
application
will
last
for
three
years
from
the
effective
date
of
the
ordinance.
But
although
we
want
the
sign
to
look
like
and
make
sure
we
have
a
funded
appropriately,
hopefully
I
you
know,
I
would
like
to
see
five
years.
I
think
that
would
be.
That
would
be
fine
just
to
make
sure.
Is
there
any
reason
that
we
put
the
readers
on
it?
Yeah.
I
Thank
you,
councilman
Nichols,
so
the
thinking
behind
the
three
years
is
that
that's
about
how
long
it
will
take
for
the
project
to
be
built
so
from
from
today
I'm
just
picking
today,
let's
say
from
January
1st
of
next
year
scale
through
design
permitting
and
then
build.
It
is
going
to
be
plus
or
minus
30
to
36
months,
and
so
hopefully
we
would
get
it
done
faster.
So
again,.
I
C
I
Months
I
felt,
like
would
be
we'd,
be
wrapping
up
and
we'd
want
to
know
that
the
sign
is
being
built
on
or
about
the
same
time
same
thing
with
the
viewing
content.
We
wouldn't
want
the
viewing
platform
that
obligation
to
be
out
there
for
10
years,
because
it
might
be
seven
years
after
the
project
is
delivered,
so
we're
open
to
some
flexibility
on
the
three
years.
But
that
was
my
thinking.
B
Behind
it
yeah,
if
that's
the
reason,
that's
the
reason,
I'm
fine
with
three
years
and
then
for
the
work,
for
course
housing.
You
know.
Obviously,
there's
no
requirement
for
that
and
I
feel
like
the
applicant
has
gone
like
above
and
beyond
on
a
lot
of
this
and
saying
you
know
if
you
that
there's
where
you
keep
asking
for
more
I,
think
five
percent
is,
is
sufficient,
I,
don't
think
we
need
I,
don't
think
more
than
that
is
necessary
for
the
for
the
product
to
be
project
to
be
successful
and
I.
B
I
On
that
last
Point
regarding
the
percentage
of
affordable
housing,
what
what
I'm
going
to
offer
when
we
come
up
and
talk
about
that
is
something
that's
very
simple
and
I
know
we
can
go
back
and
forth
and
back
and
forth
on
percentages.
But
I
appreciate
you
recognizing
that
we're
we're
really
trying
to
do
extra
and
we're
not
trying
to
be
difficult
so
that,
if
I,
if.
C
K
C
I
B
And
I
don't
have
I
really
don't
have
a
huge
heartburn
with
the
with
the
total
number
being
proposed.
I
know:
y'all
are
coming
down
because
that's
kind
of
40
40
breaker
is
typically
you
know
normal
going
to
substantially
less
than
that
and
holding
out
of
that
I
think
is
going
to
put
us
in
a
situation
where
in
the
future
it's
we've
got
to
change.
We've
got
to
change
the
The,
Landings
I,
guess
or
whatever
the
code
is
the
40
per
acre,
but
I'm
fine.
With
that
number
I
mean
you
know
400.
B
It
seems
like
a
more
reasonable
number
to
me
much
lower
than
that.
You
know
if
y'all
are
going
to
offer,
obviously
we'll
take
it,
but
I
don't
think
it's
it's
not
critical.
From
my
perspective,
it's
your
steps.
K
Yes,
Miss
Ireland
same
kind
of
as
the
question
from
the
other
one
about
the
PC
and
staff
approval
just
for
records
sake
and
audience
sake.
J
K
J
K
Thanks
and
then
I
am
supportive
of
all
of
Mr
divanals
draft
amendments
that
he
sent
just
real,
quick
lighting
restriction,
viewing
platform,
welcome,
sign,
Workforce
housing
and
tree
protection.
K
The
one
thing
I
would
like
to
say
about:
Workforce
housing
is
been
talking
about
it,
gas
going
on
like
I,
don't
know
eight
months
now
with
net
nephar
and
all
those
and
I'm
a
firm
believer
of
incentivizing,
the
developers
to
do
Workforce
housing
and
not
punishing
them
into
doing
Workforce
housing,
and
what
I
can
say
is
is
them
offering
up
five
percent
I
appreciate
that
I
think
you
know,
I
would
tell
them
to
build
as
many
units
as
they
could
and
up
the
workforce.
K
Housing
number
but
they're
kind
of
right
at
that
top
number
I
want
to.
You
know
I
think
it
should
be
more
of
an.
We
should
work
as
a
government
all
around,
not
just
us
in
Jax
Beach,
but
all
over
work
towards
more
incentivizing
the
developer
and
the
Builder
to
build
the
workforce
housing
so
them
coming
up
with
five
percent
I'd
love
to
see
it
go
to
seven
percent.
K
You
know
get
a
couple
more
units,
but
I,
understand,
I
I,
just
couldn't
I
can't
support
a
lowering
the
units
and
then
also
raising
the
workforce.
Now
that's
kind
of
hitting
them
in
the
pocket
both
ways.
So
it's
me,
you
can't
you
can't
have
the
so
with
that
I
guess
we'll
make
motions
on
all
the
rest
fixed.
K
A
You
Mr
said
it's
Mr
Mesa,
yes,
I
wanted
to
bring
up
the
the
restrictions
and.
I
Across
the
street,
the
marina
there
will
have
condos
there
right
so
the
way
the
best
way
to
do
that
is
to
do
exterior,
riding
or
ground
mounted
lighting.
So
it's
not
going
to
be
internally
eliminated.
That's
probably
the
best
way
to
do
it
again.
I
think
that's
the
detail
that
we
cover
in
the
lighting
condition,
which
I'll
hand
out
in
just
a
minute
and
and
then
and
then
in
terms
of
the
design
we
can
figure
out
as
we
get
through
it.
I
You
know
if
it's
a
statue,
if
it's
a
sign,
if
it's
a
I,
don't
know
whatever
it
might
be.
A
moderate
piece
of
art,
but
externally
ground
eliminated,
is
probably
the
best
way
to
achieve
the
condition
that
you're
describing
and
the
last
thing
that
I'll
hand
out
just
for
completing
this
is
I'm
also
going
to
give
the
city
clerk
the
the
one
on
trees,
just
so
that
everybody
has
it
in
their
in
their
hands
up
the
trees
along
the
furniture
on
Beach,
Boulevard
and
I
hope
it's
okay!
I
That
I
took
the
liberty
to
put
everything
in
writing.
I
just
thought
it
would
make
our
conversation
I
didn't
check
with
anyone.
First,
so
I
just
I,
hope,
I
hope
it
works,
that
it's
getting
it
putting
in
right.
So
we
can't
look
at
it
at
the
same
time,
but
but
yes
councilman.
We
agree
with
that
on
the
life
of
concern.
Okay,.
G
And
then
I
just
have
a
few
comments,
concerns
I,
know:
councilmember
Stones
brought
it
up.
Corey
Knuckles
brought
it
up
about
the
Planning
Commission
I
was
very
confused
by
it
sad
and
disappointed.
I
hope
this
doesn't
happen
again
and
to
address
some
of
the
comments
that
have
been
made
here
before
and
emails.
We
have
received
I'm,
not
very
saddened.
Metro
man
is
going
to
be
going
away.
G
Obviously,
things
changed,
but
I
do
appreciate
all
the
input
that
the
residents
have
given
us
on
the
workshops
here
at
the
council
meetings
I've
always
been
from
the
leader
of
being
The
Listener
to
the
residents,
but
also
at
the
same
time,
working
with
the
business
owners,
the
land
developers
and
not
punishing
them
because
they
want
to
build
because
the
roads
aren't
there
yet
or
something
I
know.
Steve
has
worked
with
the
city
closely
in
Heather
and
you
guys
have
come
to
a
agreement.
A
compromise
I
like
to
be
the
type
of
guy.
G
That's
given
me
to
the
middle,
especially
if
there's
a
lot
of
compromise
going
on
now
with
the
units
427
I
could
be
happy
with
400
415
I
appreciate
Mr
Steve,
trying
to
say
that
he's
willing
to
work
with
the
city
on
that
number
I
also
understand
the
fluctuation
on
the
economy
and
everything
that's
going
on
right
now,
with
the
price
of
over
the
cost
of
living
and
the
cost
of
everything
going
up.
Obviously
they
want
to
make
the
most
money
as
possible.
G
If
not
I,
don't
know
what
kind
of
business
people
would
you
know,
go
into
business
and
not
make
money
with
the
workforce.
I
do
appreciate
that
whether
it's
five
percent,
seven
percent
ten
percent
I
think
is
good.
I
know
when
the
apartment
complex
next
to
the
police
station
was
built
in
new
water.
There
was
courtesy
officers
and
they
were
able
to
afford
to
live
there.
G
I
haven't
been
a
neighborhood
I,
haven't
seen
any
houses
they're
living
at
the
moment,
but
making
the
workforce
available
for
First,
Responders
nurses
and
teachers
I
think
that
would
be
beneficial
to
the
community,
because
I
know
many
teachers
that
have
lived
at
the
beach
can
no
longer
afford
to
live
here,
and
those
are
the
ones
that
I
know
that
teach
either
Fletcher
or
any
of
the
schools.
G
F
F
It's
a
little
bit
different.
So
and
I
have
a
question
for
the
afternoon
in
the
proposed
amendment
for
the
city
sign,
it
says:
work
with
the
city
to
achieve
it
mutually
agreed
upon
design
for
any
structure
of
which
you
might
be
constructed
and
installed
by
the
city.
The
city
will
be
constructing
it.
Correct.
Yes,.
I
F
In
that
case,
I,
don't
understand
why
you
need
to
because
we
have
a
three-year
time
limit.
It
could
be
open
if
you
are
allotting
the
land
for
the
city
to
do
the
building.
We
might
want
to
figure
out
what
kind
of
art
we
want
to
do.
Use
our
Arc
Community
or
something
like
that.
So
I
don't
understand
the
need
for
the
three
years.
If
we
are
not
relying
on
your
construction,
yeah.
F
I
I
I
And
the
and
the
the
boardwalk,
but
we
also
don't
want
to
have
construction
going
on
while
people
are
moving
in
we'd
like
to
have
the
sign
done.
At
the
same
time,
the
building
opens
up
so
having
12
or
18
months
later,
a
new
construction
project
on
the
sign
I
mean
it
is
isolated,
it's
a
little
bit
far
away.
I
So
maybe
there's
a
way
to
build
an
end,
but
we
want
the
decision
if
we're
going
to
give
that
extra
year
to
implement
it,
and
we
want
the
decision
a
little
sooner
so
two
years
to
notify
hey
we're
going
to
build
the
sign
and
then
two
years
to
implement,
rather
than
just
it
has
to
be
done
within
three
years
of
the
effectively.
Maybe
then,
maybe
the
city
notifies
us
two
years
after
the
effective
date,
and
then
it's
built
four
years
within
four
years
after
the
effective
date.
I
Maybe
that's
a
way
to
split
the
difference
and
that
would
be
for
both
for
the
sign
and
the
viewing
platform.
Okay,.
F
The
I
don't
think
our
residents
will,
let
us
not
have
to
you
know.
After
doing
all
this,
let
us
hang
to
hang
out
on
not
doing
a
welcome
sign,
they'd
want
something
that
would
welcome
others
to
the
beach.
So.
F
You
haven't
sold
me
on
the
three
years
before
the
or
a
time
limit
on
the
sign
itself
that,
but
you
mentioned
the
the
two
and
two
I
could.
F
F
You
are
correct,
obviously
correct
on
this
part.
You
don't
have
to
do
Workforce
housing,
but
you
also
want
this
cut
and
we
can
make
it
far
big.
We
need
you
to
do
the
workforce
housing.
We
don't
want
to
make
it
so
it's
not
financially
viable
for
the
applicant.
You
know
we're
not.
We
don't
want
to
go
to
pick
us
up
in
all
the
affordable
housing
so.
F
That,
but
do
you
think
that
you
still
have
some
more
wiggle
room,
especially
since
there's
a
great
argument
that
this
is
this
helps
with
public
value
it.
It
makes
this
a
more
livable
place
for
individuals.
I
can
go
from
the
10
down
to
I,
like
Fernando.
Seven
I
think
you
said
seven
as
well,
but
I
don't
think
I
can
go
lower
than
seven
percent.
F
Affordable
housing
units
I
am
slightly,
but
with
that
seven
percent,
I'm
gonna
go
down
from
ten
to
seven
I
would
say
you
need
to
add
a
couple
three
bedrooms,
because
people
still
do
happy
so
even
up
here
on
the
days,
even
though
only
no
now
you
got
three,
the
majority
of
the
kids
come
from
the
minority
of
the
council.
There
are
people
out
there
who
do
have
kids.
I
Right
so
I
feel
like
I'm
on
Shark
Tank,
so.
I
Offer
and
I
don't
want
to
you
know:
I,
don't
want
to
upset
Mr
Cuban
over
here,
I'd
like
to
Mr
Wonderful
list,
but
anyway,
I
I
hear
you
on
the
the
three-bedroom
unit
question
so
that
that's
a
that's
an
even
bigger
ask,
because
we
don't
know
what
the
ideal
unit
mix
is
going
to
be
so.
I
I
The
three
bedroom
number
of
three
bedroom
units
I
would
ask
that
we
just
hold
that
and
give
me
time
to
confer
with
the
development
team
before
November
7th
before
the
next
meeting
and
I
will
take
that
as
an
open
issue.
That
I
will
try
to
get
answered
on
whether
or
not
we
can
do
any
three
bedrooms
right
now.
The
plan
I
believe
is
done.
I
So,
let's
just
if
we
could
I
would
like
to
hold
that
aside
on
the
on
the
on
the
percentages,
kind
of
work
with
me
here
for
a
minute,
I'm
just
going
to
use
round
numbers.
If
we
have
425
units
and
we
go
down
to
400-
again
that's
a
reduction
of
about
six
percent
and
then,
if
we
do
five
percent
of
those
400
as
affordable
units.
Now
we've
lowered
our
total
unit,
count
by
11,
plus
or
minus.
I
If
you,
if
you
hang
with
me
there
on
the
map,
so
the
seven
percent
in
a
vacuum
at
427
units
is
something
that
that
I
think
we
could
do.
If
we
go
down
closer
to
395,
then
I'm
going
to
be
talking
more
about
staying
closer
to
the
five
percent
and
and.
K
I
C
G
I
Are
to
427
the
the
easier
it
is
to
agree
to
seven
percent
the
quotient
we
are
to
385,
then
we're
going
to
be
at
five
percent
and
then
somewhere
in
there.
We
also
have
to
talk
about
the
the
Ami
ranges.
So
what
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
to
balance
all
three
of
those
living
pieces?
So
to
me
it's
you
know.
You
know
399
units
with
seven
percent
at
like
you
know,
100
Ami,
that
that
would
be
kind
of
where
my
brain
goes.
I
Balancing
all
of
those
because
we
get
you
know
we
did
below
400
units,
we've
increased
the
percentages
to
seven
percent
and
and
100
Ami.
Even
120
am
I.
Honestly
still
is
Workforce
housing
given
the
incomes
but
but
showing
a
little
bit
of
give
on
each
metric
is
kind
of
where
I
am
and
I'm
really
not
trying
to
bargain
I'm.
Just
trying
to
illustrate
how
I
think
about
the
machine
when
we
get
to
the
motion.
F
Okay,
I
am
that
is
that
I'm
comfortable
with
that
as
long
as
those
units
are
just
interest
throughout
the
the
property,
and
so
it's
you
know
as
soon
as
somebody
comes
in
and
they
say
you
know,
this
is
my
income
and
they
they
qualify
for
that
and
there's
a
percentage
and
unit
B
is
open
and
it's
about
the
best
view
overlooking
the
pool
or
something
that
would
be
the
one
that
they
would.
I
Come
right,
no
I,
understand
I,
understand
that
that
concept
as
well,
and
that's
one
that
we've
been
add
to
the
language
today,
the
other
thing
I
would
say,
is
obviously
you're
going
to
move
and
adopt
several
amendments
this
evening.
I
hope,
if
you
do,
if
we
miss
words
attorney
Robinson
I,
can
work
together
or
Heather
the
three
of
us
going
together
in
a
word
Smith
that,
for
example,
added
three
bedroom
units.
If
that's
something
we
can
work
on
that
between
now
and
November
7th
as
well,
so
I
don't
want
to
leave
anybody.
I
B
I
just
want
to
Echo
some
of
the
Summits
from
my
colleagues
I'm,
not
in
favor
of
the
10,
affordable
housing
in
Greece,
either.
I
think
that
if
you
give
us
the
427
and
a
7
once
again
he's
making
concessions,
he's
made
a
tremendous
amount
of
concessions
throughout
this.
I
I
Think
it's
it's
a
move
in
the
right
direction.
If
I
could
just
add
one
more
fact
about
mayor.
The
other
thing
to
remember
is
that
by
having
427
units
to
the
supply
side,
it
also,
we
hope,
will
have
a
positive
impact
on
rental
rates.
I,
don't
know
that
we'll
be
able
to
measure
it
and
the
first
you
know
the
moment
opens,
but
it's
just
so
flying
event.
We're
going
to
be
adding
a
significant
number
of
units.
I,
don't
know
how
many
there
are
in
Jacksonville
Beach,
but
it's
this
will
be
a
significant
number.
I
The
other
thing
to
think
about
too
is
When.
We
Shrunk
the
size
of
the
development
parcel.
It
also
increased
our
need
to
have
structured
parking,
so
our
structured
parking
right
now
equates
to
about
427
units.
It
equates
to
about
three
thousand
dollars
per
unit
because
we
have
to
build
structured
parking.
Another
attack
we
could
have
taken
was
hey,
let's
lower
the
parking
count,
because
there's
tons
of
data
that
says
two
per
unit
is
not
what's
necessary,
but
we
chose
not
to
do
that
again.
I
We're
using
the
Pud
not
to
wave
portions
of
the
code,
but
it's
inputs
and
conditions,
so
I
just
think
adding
the
additional
Supply
shrinking
the
development
parcel,
increasing,
Structure
Parking
use
all
of
those
factors
together.
Certainly
427
units
of
seven
percent
would
be
great
3.99,
as
I
mentioned
before.
That
seven
percent
would
be
acceptable
as
well
and
and
again
we
just
leave
it
up,
so
the
council
will
sort
of
figure
out
where
they
want
to
land
on
those
and
the
427
is
a
concession
from.
I
Or
something
like
that,
it
is,
it
is
and
again
we
we
would.
B
Yeah
I
had
a
question
for
Mr
Robinson,
so
in
these
proceedings
it's
based
off
competent
and
substantial
information,
where
it's
a
fact-based
decision
not
based
off
opinion.
How
does
the
if
they're
fitting
into
what
the
requirement
is?
How
is
the
you
know
us
reducing
it
based
off
of
a
feeling
that
this
is
too
many
or
or
not
enough
or
or
the
number
of
the
percentage
of
Workforce
housing
is
all
based
off
of
a
feeling
of
what
we
want
in
this
opinion
on
the
fact,
how
does
that
fall?
C
C
C
If
the
applicant
was
resisting
those
efforts
to
increase
concessions
against
its
will,
then
we
would
have
a
problem,
but
he
seems
very
voluntary,
and
much
of
this
was
just
us
displayed
to
us
prior
to
the
opening
of
this
hearing,
and
so
as
long
as
we
stay
in
that
particular
path.
I
think
everything
is
fine.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you,
I,
don't
see
any
other
lights
on
the
board,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
start
taking
the
Amendments
one
at
a
time
and
Mr
do
you
know
I,
do
appreciate
you
putting
these
items
in
writing
for
us
particulars,
particularly
since
I
know,
they
were
based
on
your
observation
of
the
Planning
Commission
meeting,
as
well
as
discussions
at
the
community
meetings
and
with
concerned
citizens
and
with
the
members
of
the
council.
A
So,
although
just
because
you
put
them
in
writing
for
us
doesn't
mean
we
have
to
adopt
them
as
written
so,
but
they
are
a
good,
a
tool
to
get
a
first
round
of,
and
then
it's
done
and
then,
of
course,
as
you
mentioned,
we've
got
until
November
7th
to
make
any
additional
wordsmithing
and
things
we
need
to
do
before.
We
make
our
second,
the
Mr
angels.
A
So
I
was
gonna
suggest
we
maybe
start
with
the
easy
ones
first,
but
where
which
one
were
you
gonna
go
with
I'm,
just
gonna,
Jump,
Right,
In
I,
believe
so.
Okay,.
B
Go
for
it
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
add
the
the
channel
affordable,
Workforce
housing.
The
developer
can
make
five
percent
of
the
total
residential
parking
units
available
for
rent
from
time
to
time,
in
accordance
with
Section
420
point:
zero,
zero,
zero,
fourth
order
statute
for
15
years,
and
so
long
as
residential
units
are
made
and
available
for
rent.
F
Dumont
I'd
like
to
take
a
motion
to
the
application
to
for
is
on
attainable,
affordable
Workforce
housing
and
the
applicant
has
been
very
accommodating
so
that
the
developer
shall
make
seven
percent
of
the
total
residential
Apartments
units
available
for
rent
from
time
to
time,
in
accordance
with
Section
420.0004
Florida
statutes
for
15
years
in
a
so
long
as
residential
units
are
made
available
for
rent,
and
this
is
lawyer
like
work
on
this
language
that
they'll
be
just
dispersed
throughout
the
development.
Second,
we.
K
I
For
just
because
we're
in
the
posture
of
that
motion,
I
would
just
say
that
we
would
agree
with
that
as
the
applicant
since
we're
I
want
to
confirm
what
attorney
Robinson
said
about
this
being
a
condition
that
we
would
agree
to
in
the
context
of
design.
So
we
would
agree
to
that
and
I
believe
Mr
Stokes
is
right.
I
Regardless
the
units
will
be
dispersed,
we're
not
going
to
put
them
all
in
one
wing
of
one
building,
for
example,
they
would
be
dispersed
so
I,
don't
know
what
the
exact
perfect
words
would
be,
but
I
think
you
said
the
spruce
dispersed
throughout
the
development.
That
would
be
fine
and
if
we
need
to
reference
a
state
or
a
federal
statute.
In
addition
to
make
it
clear
we'll
do
that
before
we
come
back,
but
I
I
understand
the
notion
and
we're
fine
with
that.
Thank
you.
A
K
I
In
the
context
of
there's
no
motion
on
the
floor
to
reduce
the
unit
count
so
427
units
seven
percent-
we
we
would
agree
with
that,
which
means
that
if
this
is
adopted
and
there's
a
subsequent
motion
to
lower
the
account
you'll
hear
me
get
a
little
bit
more
anxious.
But
for
the
time
being,
yes,
we're
fine
with
it.
Then
it
is
right
now.
B
C
A
You
who
would
like
to
make
the
next
Amendment,
don't
we
have
to
vote
on
this
note.
Yeah
that'd
be
a
good
point.
Anyone
else,
Madam
clerk
roll
call
on
the
amendment
regarding
attainable,
affordable,
Workforce,
Office.
D
F
Would
like
to
make
another
motion?
Okay,
we
got
lots
of
motions
here.
Considering
the
applicant
sees
that
399
units
instead
of
the
427,
is
doable
and
he
is
agreed
to
it
and
the
numbers
work
for
them
at
the
seven
percent.
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
reduce
the
number
of
units
in
the
Pud
from
427
to
399.
B
I
think
we're
double
penalizing
the
applicant
I
think
he
was
hesitant
about
moving
to
that
number
I'd
like
to
offer
a
Amendment
to
415
units
can
I
make
a
moment.
A
F
I'm
not
sure
why
he's
the
applicant
was
willing
for
that.
It's
not
a
double
penalty,
it's
something
that
he
was
willing
to
do
and
it's
better
for
me.
If
we're
one
of
the
concerns,
I
was
trying
to
balance
out
also
the
concern
of
traffic
and
increased
density
within
the
city,
and
this
is
another
Avenue
that
we
would
be
able
to
use
to
address
that
and
so
I'm
not
sure
why
you're
pushing
for
more
units
when
we're
really
trying
to
get
it
down
to
a
number
he's
agreed
to
so
again.
G
I
Brain
is
working
like
that
is
how
I
think
about
the
issue.
So
let's
talk
specifically
about
all
three
components
again
so
seven
percent
is
fine.
Obviously
415
is
is
better
than
3.99
and
that's
that
is,
that
would
be
great.
Then
we
have
the
third
component,
which
is
the
Ami
bands,
so
I'll
just
answer
them
all
at
once.
If
we
go
to
399
units
or
I,
think
your
was
the
motion
to
reduce
it
to
399
and
we're
and
we're
at
seven
percent.
I
Then
if
we
are
silent
and
we
just
go
with
the
statute
which
allows
residents
up
to
100
20
percent
of
Ami,
we
would
be
fine
with
that.
If
we
start
knocking
down
further
on
the
Ami
and
reducing
the
flexibility
on
on
the
income
bans,
then
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
agree
that
399
units,
so
I
would
say,
take
them
together
at
the
same
time
and
the
Alternatives
would
be
you
know,
415
at
415
units
at
seven
percent
or
399
at
seven
percent
with
120
percent
am
I
being
available.
I
F
Right
and
I've
concede
the
100
the
what
you're
asking
for
for
the
reduce
number,
because
that
is
a
that's
our
residence
concern.
My
concern
is
affordable
housing.
Their
concern
is
their
number
and
so
I
would
concede
the
the
100
the
100
to
100.
So.
I
So
to
be
just
clear,
then,
if
this
motion,
as
it
was
stated,
was
399
units
and
a
reduction
of
399
units
and
that's
it-
we
would
agree
to
that
and
we
will
not
be
agreeing
to
any
further
changes
in
the
in
the
income
bands.
We
would
just
stick
with
the.
C
A
B
Again,
I,
don't
he's
already
made
a
concession
to
drop
down
to
427
I
think
that's!
That's
only
fair
that
if
we
we
increase
from
his
five
percent
to
the
seven
percent
that
would
remain
at
427.
E
Just
so
everybody
knows,
427
units
at
seven
percent
would
be
30,
affordable,
Workforce
housing
units
399
units
at
seven
percent
would
be
28.
Workforce
housing
units
415
at
7
would
be
29
Workforce
housing
units.
Just
so
everybody
is
aware.
Mr
steps
well.
K
Miss
Holdings
took
my
thunder
and
I'm,
not
a
math
person,
so
good
job,
yeah
I,
know
I
had
to
bring
out
the
calculator
to
me.
I
I
would
like
us
to
stick
with
the
original
number,
because
now
I
feel
like
we're
hurting
the
people
that
we're
trying
to
help
by
getting
Workforce
housing,
we're
taking
away
two
units,
one
to
two
units,
that's
Wonder
or
sorry,
two
to
four
bedrooms
that
we're
taking
away
that's
two
families:
that's
it
one
to
two
families
that
may
not
qualify
for
housing.
K
So
you
know
I,
said
earlier:
I
think
we
should
be
incentivizing
developers
to
do
it.
He
agreed
to
go
up
from
five
to
seven
percent
I
think
we
should
keep
the
units
to
have
more
Workforce
housing
rather
than
lowering
those
counts.
I'll
I'll.
A
The
415.
so
so
I
just
clean,
cleaner,
would
rather
just
vote
on
that
on
your
Amendment
and
then
you
can
just
slow
it
down,
and
then
it
would
defer
to
miss
dumont's
original
number
of
399
and
we'll
we'll
vote
on
that.
And
if
that
fails,
it
would
default
to
427.,
because
I
don't
think
you
can
just
yeah.
Okay,
anybody
miss
you
Mom
yeah.
Thank.
F
You
I
on
cloud
news
interviewers,
it's
one
unit
difference
thank
you
for
seeing
if
you're
doing
wrap
it
over
there,
it's
one
unit
difference
with
regard
to
the
affordable
housing,
but
16
units
total,
which
would
be
32
more
cars
which
are
concerned
with
the
residents.
F
I
want
to
thank
Mr,
deeb
now
and
and
the
applicant
for
will
for
their
willingness
to
get
to
these
numbers.
We've
discussed
this
a
lot
and
I
think
that
399
with
nothing
with
the
API
is
in
the
best
interest
for
the
developer,
because
they
wouldn't
say
that
they
could
do
it.
If
it
was,
they
couldn't
do
it
in
the
best
interest
for
the
developer,
as
well
as
the
city
regarding
traffic,
as
well
as
having
mixed-use
housing
regarding
mixed-use
housing.
Well,
mixed
price
range
housing,
Mr,
Nichols
I
can
withdraw
my
motion,
then.
Why.
A
B
E
I
just
want
to
mention
that
I
do
support
this
amendment
because,
like
Ms
Dumont
said
the
concerns
that
we've
heard
from
the
community
has
this.
This
does
try
to
address
some
of
the
traffic
concerns,
but
it
still
gives
us
28
units
of
Workforce
housing
which,
which
I
think
is
still
a
good.
A
good
number
closed,
fairly
close
to
the
forge.
What
we
would
get
with
the
427
so
I
would
support
it.
K
Seeing
as
we
get
two
readings
on
this,
and
we
can
make
amendments
at
both
Mr
deed
and
now
I'd
like
to
issue
a
little
homework,
is
you
know:
you've
got
415,
427
399,
all
kind
of
floating
out
there.
K
We
got
seven
percent
Workforce
housing
that
we've
already
gotten
to
so
we've
already
gotten
that
up
a
little
bit
before
the
next
meeting
at
the
next
meeting
kind
of
just
talk
to
the
the
property
owner
and
give
us
some
feedback
so
that
you
know
personally
this
this
time,
I'll
be
letting
it
down,
maybe
in
two
weeks,
with
a
little
more
feedback
from
the
property
owner.
Maybe
you
know
you'd
be
willing
to
go
to
eight
percent
Workforce
housing.
K
If
we
up
the
units,
you
know
I
think
there's
some
wiggle
room
that
we
don't
need
to
reading
one
of
two
Tire
cells.
You
know
completely
down
and
drained.
We
could
change
it
in
two
weeks,
but
I
think
it's
easier
to
for
you
to
come
back
to
us
with
a
little,
maybe
there's
a
sweetener
to
the
pot
so
to
speak.
Okay,
so,
okay.
A
A
F
A
A
E
B
Dad
has
been
then
to
this:
is
developers
don't
control
the
effects
of
life
from
automobiles
or
other
sources
on
the
property
all
Lighting
on
the
building
and
in
parking
lots
shall
be
pedestrian,
oriented
and
Shelby
self-contained,
as
they
have
no
glare
or
light
pollution
negatively
impacting
nearby
residential
uses.
Second,
we.
G
The
regular
motion
and
developers
are
maybe
parcelon
available
to
the
city
in
the
northwest
corner
of
the
property
as
depicted
and
site
plan
to
accommodate
the
awoken
side
or
iconic
entry
feature
for
residents
and
desserts
entering
Jacksonville
Beach.
The
developers
are
working
with
the
city
to
achieve
a
mutual
agreed
upon
design
for
any
structure
by
which
structure
which
might
be
constructed
installed
by
the
city
and
low-costal
developer.
K
Yeah
I'd
like
to
motion
to
amend
the
four
years,
broken
down
into
two
years,
to
notify
the
developer
in
two
years
to
build.
Second.
B
A
A
Stokes,
yes,
councilmember
demon,
yes,
mayor
Hoffman,
yes,
the
amendment
carries
any
discussion
on
the
original
amendment
in
this
building.
E
I'd
like
to
propose
an
amendment
that
we
add
that
the
that
the
sign
will
be
eliminated
with
ground
mounted
lighting.
A
B
F
E
I
A
I
E
A
E
Would
like
to
withdraw
my
Amendment
and
propose
a
new
amendment
that
the
that
the
sign
would
not
be
internally
illuminated.
F
This
one
I
just
want
to
address
council
members
Hope's
question
about
the.
F
E
A
I
think
on
this
one
in
particular,
I
would
like
staff
to
take
a
look
at
this
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
verbiage
how
we
want
it
between
now
and
the
second
reading.
For
example,
do
we
need
to
state
that
we
will
be
granted
an
easement
for
design,
and
things
like
that,
so
I
I
think
this
one
has
a
little
more
work
to
do
in
this
Ireland.
J
Can
I
just
address
the
lighting
so
yeah
as
Mr
given
now
stated
it's
either
internally
illuminated
lightly
inside
or
not,
but
there
are
standards
already
in
the
code
that
we
would
make
sure.
The
sign
follows
that
kind
of
meet
those
lighting
standards
that
you've
applied
to
the
whole
property,
so
to
kind
of
stick
with.
That
will
be
consistent
if
we
stay
within
the
code.
Thank.
F
Okay,
yeah,
you
I'm,
not
sure
where
you're
going
with
the
the
deed
and
permitted
use.
This
is
only
for
their
sign.
It's
not
for
us!
D
I
That
mean
that
land
is
going
to
be
deeded
to
the
city
of
Jacksonville
Beach,
or
is
that
a
Perpetual
Amusement
that
will
be
granted
by
the
property
ownership?
That's
a
great
question
that
I
hadn't
thought
of
yet
that's
a
great
example,
we'll
figure
out
the
proper
format
and
again
it's
your
it's
yours,
the
community
sign.
So
if
it's
internally
illuminated
as
long
as
it's
an
interviewer
with
that
corner
of
the
building,
then
that's
great.
I
It's
externally
limited
that'd
be
great
too,
but
typically
what
people
want,
whether
they're
concerned
about
lighting
is
externally
eliminated,
sign,
whether
it's
ground
mounted
or
the
signs
are
on
the
build
on
the
structure
itself
is
one
of
the
other
doesn't
matter
just
as
long
as
it's
externally
illuminated,
but
we
will
answer
the
question
Mr
stuff
office
before
the
next
meeting,
whether
it's
an
easement
or
a
deed
of
the
proper,
we'll
figure
it
out.
Thank.
A
You
any
other
questions
or
comments
on
the
source
of
the
lighting
for
the
sign.
A
C
D
B
F
Like
to
make
a
motion
regarding
a
quick
amendment
to
regarding
including
viewing
platform
connections
and
and
to
read,
the
developer
shall
construct
a
sidewalk
and
viewing
platform
that
extends
South
Moon
property
line
until
it
is
at
a
minimum
perpendicular
with
shutter
Avenue
in
a
location
reasonably
determined
by
the
developer,
the
developers
will
permit
a
city-sponsored
connection
to
the
viewing
platform
from
shutter
Avenue.
The
developer
will
provide
commercially
reasonable
easements
and
assistance
permitting
any
connection
to
the
viewing
platform
by
the
city.
A
E
I
Well,
this
is
a
connection
that
the
city
would
be
constructing,
so
whether
it's
a
sidewalk
or
a
raised
walkway
is
going
to
be
up
to
the
city.
So
we
don't.
We
don't
really
care
what
you
call
it,
but
cheddar
is
pretty
much
water
from
the
end
of
the
the
the
street
and
the
entrance
to
pardino.
Are
it's
pretty
much
water
all
the
way,
so
you
hit
the
intercoastal,
so
it
will
most
likely
be
a
raised.
Yes,.
E
I
A
L
Let's
start
with
the
first
question:
first,
the
time
frame
as
you're
aware
we're
still
in
the
process
of
finalizing
the
early
Trail.
B
So
if
there's
any
way,
we.
I
I
To
make
a
contribution
towards
the
construction,
it
was
when
that
project
was
going
to
be
developed
and
we
were
going
to
build
it.
We
were
going
to
design
it.
We
were
going
to
do
everything
ourselves
to
make
the
connection
we
have
been
in
that
part
of
the
conversation
because
of
how
complicated
it
got
with
the
neighborhoods
further
down
the
road.
So
as
far
as
the
contribution
of
the
cost
I
I
don't
have
that
Authority
this
evening,
but
I'll
take
that
back
and
and
see
if
I
can
get
some
Authority
right
now.
I
My
what
I
would
say
is
that
we
could
agree
to
the
five
years.
I
want
to
confirm
it,
but
for
tonight
let's
agree
to
five
years.
I'll
get
back
on
the
authority
on
the
on
the
sharing
of
costs,
and
then
I
also
have
as
a
takeaway
Mr
Stokes
request
that
we
look
at
the
unit
count
before
we
come
back
as
my
second
or
I
guess.
Third,
now
take
away
just
to
recap.
Thank.
E
I
Of
the
future
picture
in
the
in
the
earlier
Amendment
regarding
the
viewing
platform,
let
me
just
see
hold
on
a
second
actually.
It
says
the
developer
shall
permit
a
city
sponsor
connection.
So,
if
you
want
to
make
yes,
we
we
will
make
it
so
that
it
can
connect.
I
I
C
C
F
As
like
a
little
Clarity
on
this
I'm
hearing,
two
different
things,
Mr
Nichols
is
saying
the
the
applicant
will
develop
up
into
the
public
land
and
what
I'm
hearing
like
onto
their
property
to
where
we
would
then
connect
in
and
I'm
hearing
from
you,
you.
B
I
Again,
we
use
I
use
the
language
perpendicular
to
shatter,
because
our
original
intention
was
that
the
viewing
platform
would
be
swung
out
towards
the
interpostal,
the
Water
Management
District
staff
that
came
and
walked
beside
with
us
said.
Maybe
you
should
consider
swinging
it
back
closer
to
shutter,
because
there's
more
Uplands
there
and
she
didn't
view
it
as
an
ideal
location
for
a
kayak
launch
so
wherever
it
is,
whether
it
goes
close
to
shutter
or
out
in
so
they
are
coastal.
I
We're
going
to
make
that
decision
with
the
regulators
and
the
permitting
things,
if
it's
great
for
a
kayak,
we're
probably
going
to
swing
it
out
closer
towards
them
or
Coastal.
If
it's
not
such
a
great
place
where
they
really
insist
on
it
being
on
the
existing
Uplands,
the
soil
site,
the
little
big
storm
closer
to
shutter,
so
we're
going
to
take
the
north-south
cost
wherever
it
may
go.
The
East
West
cost
is
one
that
would
be
borne
by
the
city
in
in
this
example,
right.
A
A
B
D
B
D
E
C
E
Are
usually
reasonable?
Efforts
to
protect
and
preserve
the
live
oak
or
I
make
a
motion
that
the
developer
shall
use
commercially
reasonable
efforts
to
protect
and
preserve
the
Live
Oaks
trees
located
on
the
property
that
are
identified,
encircled
in
red
on
the
attached
exhibit
developer
May
remove
any
live
oak.
E
Trees
that
are
in
the
opinion
of
a
licensed,
arborist
compromised
and
sick
or
dying
developer
may
also
remove
any
live
oak
trees
that
are
located
in
such
proximity
to
necessary
infrastructure
such
as
sidewalks
driveways
parking
spaces,
drainage,
curbs
Etc
that
they
were
not
in
the
opinion
of
a
licensed
arborist
survive.
The
installation
of
such
infrastructure
developer
May
in
its
sole
discretion.
Remove
the
palm
trees
located
on
the
property
and
identified
on
the
attached,
exhibit
any
other
trees
located
on
the
property
shall
be
accounted
for
in
accordance
with
the
Land
Development
code.