►
From YouTube: Joint City Council and CRA Meeting (07/15/2019)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
B
Sexualize
that
with
there's
still
some
information
that
we
can
go
through
tonight,
but
that
tells
me
a
lot
right
there
and
it's
if
it's
food
for
thought
and
that's
kind
of
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
with
this
I'm,
not
ready
to
say
hey,
you
need
to
look
at
the
number
four.
So
that's
good
feedback
to
appreciate
that.
Okay,.
C
B
Right,
the
first
topic
will,
in
tonight's
workshop,
was,
is
to
bring
this
night
partners
back
specifically
tonight.
We
want
to
do
the
final
vetting
of
the
theory
improving
concept.
It's
got
probably
the
most
intensive
construction
related
document,
prison
preparation
and
even
though
the
pier
construction
is
going
to
stall
the
actual
implementation,
this
project
they're
under
contract,
getting
me
this
work
product.
So
before
we
put
it
to
bed
we're
staffing
with
the
second
concept.
B
They
wanted
to
come
up
with
neither
second-tier
concept
with
you
again,
probably
give
you
a
brief
overview,
how
we
got
to
the
second,
but
it's
just
a
continuation.
The
public
processes
like
this
is
how
we
came
up
with
the
design
in
the
morning.
So
with
that
I'm
gonna,
some
of
y'all
made
that
before
somebody
happens
in.
E
B
F
F
G
F
H
And
I
have
I
was
here
years
ago,
when
you
release
the
first
phase
of
implementation,
and
all
that
so
this
was
the
this
is
McGinnis.
Cody,
said
the
second
concept
and
part
of
the
desires
based
on
the
first
concept,
the
chair
themselves,
a
placeholder
for
a
large-scale
piece
of
public
art.
There
was,
and
so
we
started
looking
at
all
that
there
was
a
scale.
H
H
H
H
So
still
allow
the
people
to
move
freely
from
the
parking
lot
through
here.
We've
added
the
Coquina
boulders
and
the
planting
in
there,
as
well,
so
because
impromptu
seating.
If
you're
waiting
for
somebody
to
pick
you
out,
but
it's
not
comfortable.
At
the
same
time,
if
you're
gonna
sit
on
that
for
long
periods
of
time,
we've
kept
the
seawall
open
that
still
allows
emergency
vehicles
to
move
through
that,
and
then
the
other
idea
for
the
larger
piece
of
that
was
continuing.
H
E
H
H
D
Back
along
a
while
ago,
my
five
cents
and
I
don't
know:
where
do
you
fall
into
this?
Was
the
idea
I
liked
the
idea
of
the
lifeguard
chair,
but
I
liked
it
being
and
something
that
you've
walked
under
to
get
to
the
pier
and
I
know
now
this
concept
puts
something
to
the
right
of
the
earth,
with
the
idea
that
I
guess
you
can
t
have
a
sign
at
the
entryway.
We
have
now
have
a
gate,
metal
gate
right
versus.
H
F
B
H
H
C
B
I
C
I
B
Yes,
sir,
we
can
doctor
with
that
I
can
document
that,
with
this
Louisville
photography,
I
don't
think
we've
this
place
any
parking
now,
because
this
was
still
part
of
the
original
design
and
in
your
concept,
you're,
not
changing
the
system
hardscape
out
right
now
in
the
parking
area.
Are
you
I
think
it
working
with?
What's
there.
D
E
D
The
consensus
kind
of
Charlie
has
to
be
an
idea
on
a
gateway
like
we
had
the
the
chair.
You
walk
through
the
label
that
for
a
picture
opportunity,
one
monumental
thing.
That
is
something
my
question
is:
how
far
could
we
move
that
East
for
picture
purposes,
having
achieved
and
hospitaller
that
need
to
stay
up
closer
to
where.
F
A
D
It
has
to
mount
to
the
ground,
so
could
we
go
and
just
as
far
as
the
grass
right
there,
probably
Rick
could
use
their
a
way
to
mount
that
mountain
into
the
way
over
the
sand.
There
I
don't
know
what's
under
that,
go
into
that
I'm
just
wondering
what
area
we
haven't
worked
with
or
something
or
could
it
be
attached
to
the
pier
structure
itself
right,
like
I.
D
H
E
D
What
I
was
wondering
is
that
infeasible
for
discussion
purposes
down
for
picture
purposes,
people
wouldn't
stand
there.
Like
we've
talked
about
the
issue
of
the
lifeguards
here.
Where
you
had
at
the
floor,
four
people
would
be
able
to
take
their
picture.
That
they'd
be
stand
in
the
middle
of
the
parking
one.
So
I,
like
the
concept
of
the
lifeguard
chair,
I,
just
didn't
like
the
position
of
it,
because
it
wasn't
anything
people
to
utilize
for
picture
purposes.
Why
was
it
you're
moving
east
yeah?
D
H
J
J
You
know
whatever
that
it
all
kind
of
tied
together,
so
I
think
it
might
be
worth
considering
that
in
the
RFP
or
the
cult
artists
to
do
that
entire
stretch
concept,
so
that
I
mean
I
do
want
number
four
to
be
something.
People
would
want
to
take
a
picture
of,
but
they're
taking
pictures
by
the
surfboard
sign
already
so
I
think
it's
not
going
to
be
hard
to
be
both
artists.
D
I
I
I
guess
Mikey
started
taking
selfies
and
stuff
close
to
work,
for
is
my
understanding
with
Brigitte
the
pure
elevations.
Maybe
rate
is
probably
six
seven
feet.
Something
like
that.
Then
right
now
the
elevations
differential
between
one
and
where
the
and
maybe
where
four
is,
is
pretty
significant.
So
that's
going
to
increase
we're
gonna
be
taking
the
picture
of
your
receipt,
would
and
that
you're
going
to
be
seeing
the
ring
portion
of
in
the
background
of
the
picture
where
you're
not
gonna,
see
the
ocean
I
mean
it
might
not
I
mean
we
need
to.
B
The
in
was
a
chain
of
offenses
that
keeps
you
pedestrian
wise
from
going
out
and
if
you
count
back
three
or
four
SEC
filing
sections,
which
I
think
are
30
feet
or
50
feet.
Okay,
at
that
point,
coming
back
it's
probably
it
may
be
more
Greg
pointer.
Is
it
maybe
just
off
picture
to
the
east?
The
eight
foot
rise
start
about
here
over
there
gradually
a
Diego
will
all
the
way
towards
either
the
pier,
but
there's
no
reason
to.
A
F
H
D
B
B
They
were
put
back
where
they
are
in
some
places.
It's
like
well,
if
it's
a
queuing
line
right
there
now,
why
do
you
want
to
put
bike
racks
right
there?
It
were
the
people
of
masses
when
we
put
it
across
the
street
on
the
adjacent
pylon,
something
like
that,
something
that's
a
methodology
them
using
the
bike
plans.
B
H
B
That
could
be
silly
I'm,
just
thinking
that,
in
the
context
of
right
there,
you're
walking
down
that
alley,
you're
gonna
have
a
five-story
building.
Just
stop
with
that.
You
see
what
the
bike
racks
are:
yeah,
that's
that's
gonna,
be
the
north
wall,
the
five-story
building
and
in
terms
of
just
a
built-in
visibility
driving
down.
Fourth
Avenue,
looking
at
the
four,
your
entryway
and
it's
just
it's
not
the
criticism,
especially.
E
E
E
E
E
B
J
B
J
F
G
J
I
I
J
E
I
B
I
I
B
Some
of
my
comments
would
speak
to
that.
I
think
there
will
be
a
little
bit
briefer
in
light
of
the
fact
that
we're
not
trying
to
boil
down
the
final
community
or
it
be
next
week.
So
that
being
said,
part
of
what
you
got
in
your
package
was
12
different
scenarios
based
on
the
various
Lots
that
the
city
or
the
CRA
knows
before
I
talk
about
any
of
them.
I
wanted
to
give
you
three
print
or
three
qualifications.
A
B
B
All
compared
with,
except
for
the
fact
that
these
things
you
see,
they're
unrealistic,
is
what
the
property
taxes
were
based
on.
So
right,
if
that's
the
case,
that's
the
case,
but
what
I'm
telling
you
is
the
source
of
the
information
for
market
value
for
those
properties
is
based
on
the
property
brothers
office
to
Francis's
point
I
will
look
at
the.
C
B
B
These
in
terms
of
relative
comparisons,
not
in
terms
of
absolute
hey,
it's
gonna
cost
five
million
dollars
to
get
that
property
so
be
aware,
the
property
values
are
low,
but
presumably
because
of
the
way
they
do
our
property
taxes,
it
ought
to
be
at
least
consistent
level
of
magnitude.
That's
number
one
number
two
number
two
I
put
the
building
pads
for
each
one
of
the
scenarios.
The
only
costed
garage
project
that
I
could
use
in
our
local
area
was
from
the
2014
garage
study
that
was
done
for
the
CRA
live.
B
We
had
a
2014
cost
estimate
for
that.
The
range
was
based
on
between
140
and
knowledge,
and
that
included
the
fact
that
the
low
end
would
be
a
garage.
It
didn't
have
much
commercial
credits.
The
high
am
going
to
be
something
that
maybe
had
a
4th
Avenue
and
1st
Street
frontage.
So
it's
a
wide
range,
but
it's
like
that
on
purpose
and
the
last
is
the
same
with
the
cost
and
again
this
is
it
now.
This
is
all
done
in
houses.
There's
no
consultant
money.
This
is
actually
used
some.
That
might
seem
your
plainer
suit.
B
B
But
again
this
is
more
to
be
thinking
for
comparative
purposes
and
I
want
to
take
a
minute
just
to
go
through
a
couple
these
and
give
you
a
couple
of
comments
expressly
in
light
of
you
know
not
the
fact
that
we're
trying
to
I
did
never
intend
to
nice
presentation
to
beat
the
'final
illness
anything
going.
Mining
furthering
the
values
square
foot
is
everything
that
really
becomes
a
professional
consultant.
B
B
If
we
did
this
scenario,
we
would
be
required
to
put
commercial
frontage
on
the
4th
Avenue
frontage
of
the
property
in
this
particular
scenario.
On
that
one,
almost
we
would
also
have
to
either
also
accommodate
or
relocate
our
police
tape,
storage,
which
convenes
can
be
accommodated
in
the
one-story
building.
But
that's
just
something:
that's
an
asset.
We
have
right
now
displacing
an
existing
parking
lot
with
a
structure
that
we
do
some
value.
J
B
Time
all
of
them
are
maximum
35
different
garage
vendors
are
telling
me
they
can
and
can't
do.
It
depends
on
construction
methodology.
Yes,
man,
we're
assuming
all
of
our
35
feet,
and
my
presumption
is
that
there
would
be
just
one
story:
the
first
floor
of
commercial
space
on
the
navy's
which
they
changed.
You
know
if
it
turns
into
multifamily
that
clads
one
of
the
sides,
maybe
a
RFP
or
responder,
would
say
I
want
to
clad
it
with
apartments
or
condominiums.
On
the
one
side,
then
it
would
obviously
wouldn't
just
be
first
for
use.
B
F
D
B
More
than
the
detail,
design
that
a
parking
garage
will
tell
you,
but
I
will
tell
you,
we
control
all
trailer
streets.
I
would
not
suggest
or
recommend
that
we
do
anything
off
a
third
street
in
terms
of
parking
access.
But
from
our
standpoint
we
control
where
the
driveways
would
be
put
on
any
three
of
these
street
frontages,
although
they
with
the
commercial
requirement
on
4th
Avenue,
were
directed
not
to
provide
garage
access
and
in
the
plan
we
haven't,
talked
about
2nd
street
months.
That
was
kind
of
the
last
street
to
be
revisited.
B
You
know
we
did
the
third
Street
with
the
medians
and
we
did
1st
Street
more
pedestrian
scale,
2nd
Street
and
the
vision
plane,
and
the
accident
plan
was
vision
as
the
local
traffic
get
them
through
the
area
not
get
them
to
the
area,
so
it
would
probably
be
appropriate
to
put
the
parking,
ingress
and
egress
on
2nd
Street.
Just
and
that's
you
know
initial
additional
consideration
of
it.
Third
one
is
basically,
if
we
put
a
parking
garage
on
the
pier
problem
and
you'll,
see
that
one,
then
the
one
after
it
they're
just
different
races.
B
The
third
slide
shows
us
basically
taking
up
a
whole
pier
property.
One
thing
that
I
did
I
forgot
to
put
in
there.
It
would
just
functionally
relocate
the
bathrooms,
because
I
don't
think
people
intuitively
are
gonna,
walk
through
the
first
floor,
the
parking
structure
to
finally
public
bathrooms
on,
so
that
one
is
what
it
is:
no
construction
cost,
but
because
we
are
bound
by
the
core
agreement
for
renourishment
and
through
our
comp
plan,
we
have
to
maintain
our
level
of
existing
beats
access
parking.
B
To
my
mind,
that
does
not
mean
we
couldn't
relocate
it
across
the
street,
but
to
the
extent
that
we
privatize
any
disk
space
with
commercial
frontage,
which
we
are
required
to
do
with
this
first
street.
As
the
commercial
funny
earth
has
that
commercial
footage,
we
would
then
be
on
the
dime
to
find
some
replacement
parking
for
whatever
it
is
this
place
unless
there.
B
I
B
A
B
To
meet
that,
we
have
to
babysit
the
supply
apartment,
we
have
my
comp
plan
and,
by
our
just
run
over
the
corner
for
beach
renourishment.
The
second
scenario
was
simply
paring
back
the
north
and
south
extents
of
it.
Dick
site
talked
about
the
view
ship
coming
down
4th
Avenue
to
the
pier.
If
that's
something
we
want
to
preserve,
we
could
maybe
perhaps
do
a
smaller
clip
and
to
the
extent
that
we've
got
potential
redevelopment
of
the
property,
that's
to
the
northwest
corner
across
the
street
and
I
think
that's
mangoes
right
now.
B
B
The
next
slide
is
probably
the
least
intensive
of
all
of
the
parking
solutions,
but
it's
a
property
that
the
city
does
own
right
now
and
that's
the
lot
behind
Campeche
Bay
and
by
the
bill,
Stevens
swimwear
shop
and
so
forth.
First
Street,
there
are
no
frontage
requirements,
so
this
could
potentially
be
a
not
a
public
private,
but
just
a
city
bill
in
the
parking
garage
or
somebody
in
the
private
sector
wanted
to
do
it
as
a
private
garage,
not
a
whole
lot
of
yield.
But
it's
just
it's
one
of
the
options.
F
B
G
B
Two
other
scenarios,
the
next
two
following
that
are
basically
expanding
on
different
property
acquisitions
in
the
block,
not
any
rhyme
or
reason:
opteka
normal
property
owner,
but
just
showing
okay.
If
we
like
that
location,
here's
how
potentially
we
can
expand
on
couple
options
if
we
expand
on
to
1st
Avenue
north,
that
can
all
be
parking
on
the
first
floor
or
we
could
rebuild
some
commercial.
On
the
first
floor,
we
would
be
required
on
1st
Street,
which
is
the
Swim
Shop,
the
retail
Swim
Shop.
B
B
This
scenario
in
there
is
I've
had
diligence
with
one
gentleman
who
is
I'm,
not
saying
he's
out
there
right
now
trying
to
assemble
this,
but
he's
looking
that
as
a
potential
redevelopment
assemblage.
So
I
said
well
if
he
missed
not
to
at
least
put
that
into
programming
that
basically
carves
out
the
surfer
property,
the
old
beautiful
building
and
it
develops
the
rest
of
that
property
acquisition
pops
and
there
would
be
required
retail
in
1st
Street
that
that
would
be
the
only
requirement.
What
you're
saying.
B
The
next
scenario
this
is
when
you
talk
about
hey-
let's,
maybe
you
know
we're
we're
talking
about
not
doing
the
garage
that
I'm
gonna
86.
Now
this
is
actually
the
identified
site
that
would
be
leveraged
to
help
redevelop
the
south
end
of
Lakeland
plasma,
and
that
would
be
some
type
of
privatization
of
the
North
Bates
Basin
Latham
Plaza,
because
we
want
to
do
it
not
because
the
code
requires
it.
The
code
does
require
that
we
would
provide
commercial
frontage
will
firstly,
so
we
did
at
least
problem
most
likely.
B
We
did
some
type
of
presence
on
looking
out
over
the
park,
whether
it's
a
dedicated
Ocean,
View,
Hotel,
or
a
hotel,
boutique
hotel
and
some
shops.
But
then
we
have
commercial
frontage,
all
first
Street
as
well.
In
that
scenario,
we
probably
doing
well
and
again,
we
borne
out
by
detail-
are
a
few
respondents.
I
think
we'd
be
doing
well
to
maintain
that
existing
parking
count
and
accommodate
just
what,
whatever
private
developments
on
that
property
I
don't
see.
A
net
gain
of.
You
know
additional
spaces,
some
of
these
other
properties.
B
If
you
look
around
you
look
wow.
If
we
provide
a
hundred
new
spaces,
what
will
that
leverage?
This
is
not
necessarily
a
location
where
we
leverage
the
additional
private
sector
development,
but
this
is
also
a
very
high
demand.
Public
parking
space
for
the
festival's
fourth
of
July,
for
just
beach,
going
in
general
I
mean
today
their
Lots,
probably
pack.
Just
on
a
side
note.
B
People
are
daily
waiting
in
line
at
every
one
of
our
parking
kiosks.
The
paper
party-
that's
in
fact,
I
know.
If
you
all
of
those
are
that
or
not
I
have
to
tell
people
hey.
You
need
to
look
at
the
sign
of
foam.
You
don't
need
to
pay
till
8
o'clock
tonight
and
they
do
backflips
there
soon.
Oh,
we
don't
have
to
pay
so
they
walk
away.
The
people
are
lining
up
at
these
because
I
used
to
see
them
another
market.
So
it's
just
kind
of
a
side
observation.
F
B
And
this
doesn't
preclude
that
this.
Well,
if
you
don't
eat
into
the
plaza
we'd
eat
into
the
first
amount,
and
then
would
you
make
it
one
I've
already
taught
a
lot.
My
thinking
is,
we
might
want
to
put
like
a
one-way
street,
and
if
we
did,
we
do
it
from
first
Street
off
of
the
beach,
as
opposed
to
dumping
people
out
onto
our
pedestrian
street.
Looking
for
something
to
do,
it
could
more
be
a
way
out,
but
it
can
also
be
a
privately
owned.
F
B
Really
the
other
thing
and
I'm
not
I'm,
not
discounting
that
today
the
gladdens
action
circulation
plan,
but
when
you
can't
continue
and
go
into
third
Street,
it's
really
kind
of
a
gap
that
I
don't
think
a
lot
of
people
would
know
about.
Unless
you
have
retailers
that
go
in
there,
that
just
amaze
I
want
on
street
market
like
town
center,
you
know
the
parking
that
nobody
can
ever
find
with
it.
That's
a
way,
that's
there,
but
you
just
came
to
the
parking
space
there.
So
what
you're
right?
B
It
is
noted
that
that's
still
part
of
that
plan,
the
next
option
after
that
would
be
basically
coke.
It
was
kind
of
that
came
up
to
me
kind
of
from
the
comment
about
in
the
alcohol.
The
last
alcohol
meet
again
under
that
talk.
He
was
talking
about
what
his
potential
down
road
desires
may
be
with
that
property.
That's
like
well
that
may
be
an
option
for
us,
that's
the
mega
garage
of
all
of
them
right
now.
B
That
would
be
a
huge
amount
of
parking,
but
again
it's
what
would
we
use
to
incent
or
what
are
we
trying
to
incentivize
with
providing
that
volume
of
additional
parking
once
concept?
That's
not
in
here
it's
just
below
that
I
thought
about
that
happen.
We
all
did
this.
It
may
be
that
whether
it's
mr.
cravaack
arose
that
sneakers
building
we
could
take
their
surface
parking.
Get
air
rights
over
that
incorporate
his
required
parking
in
a
garage.
B
So
it
kind
of
be
like
a
surfer
scenario-
would
be
all
of
the
Block
except
for
that
building,
because
that's
the
buildings
in
good
shape,
huge
I
can't
I
can't
really
bad
on
what
a
future
use
of
that
building
might
be.
But
it
may
well
be
that
somebody
wants
to
buy
that
permission
of
Pratt.
They
say
you
know
what
we
agree
with
that.
We
want
the
more
critical
mass,
more
people
in
that
garage,
maybe
more
people
in
my
business.
So
that
might
that's
kind
of
like
an
option-
that's
not
on
here,
but.
B
B
B
Ok,
the
next
one
I
was
the
benefit
of
somebody
else
in
the
private
sector
of
doing
some
diligence
on
what
they
could
do
with
I
call
it
the
wrist
block,
but
it
still
it's
mostly
apartments,
I
care.
What
the
apartment
thing
is,
but
it's
that
property-
and
in
this
scenario
you
just
talked
about
developing
a
smaller
scale,
part
of
the
public
rock.
We
still
falter.
It's
lots
of
public
parking
lot
in
front
of
the
risk.
This
would,
if
we
provide
any
structured
parking
review
required
to
put
commercial
on
First
Street,
even
this
small
garage.
B
G
B
Here
a
lot
right
now
that
would
add
to
the
develop
ability
of
that
property
like
to
buy
to
the
parking
and
the
in
the
garage
and
we
control
that
property,
so
that
could
be
part
of
whoever
would
lease
or
sell
the
property
to.
We
could
say
well
we're
going
to
provide
to
that
parking
in
this
scenario,
that
same
concept
would
apply
to
the
next
yeah
there's,
basically,
two
more
scenarios.
B
The
second
and
one
thing
that
also
does
is
that
respects
the
fact
the
small
and
you
see
up
there
now
it
respects
the
fact
that,
since
we're
not
acquiring
that
apartment
building,
we're
not
slaying
up
a
three-story
garage
right
on
the
east
face
of
that
apartment.
Building
this
it's
just
if
it
doesn't
have
to
be
done
and
we
don't
need
it
and
it
would
provide
some
surface
parking.
It
would
keep
that
area
to
review
ship
in
that
area.
I
B
Sir,
that's
4th
Avenue
north.
So
if
we
did
that
yes,
sir,
it
would
require
commercial
frontage
and
again
it's
on
First
Street.
So
we
have
that
commercial
front
is
off
well
and
again,
it's
just
a
30
foot
depth
from
the
market.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
a
reasonable
death,
the
market
works,
55
or
whatever,
and
any
of
those
commercial
uses
that
they
turn
into
restaurants.
It's
kind
of
like
the
Frances
will
relate
to
this.
The
issue
we
deal
with
on
the
backside
of
the
Campeche
that
whole
strip.
B
You
know
every
restaurants
got
to
have
a
back
side
to
it.
Fortunately,
that's
one
of
the
mark,
art
master
plan,
mural
area,
so
hopefully
that's
going
to
be
addressed
as
well.
The
next
scenario
is
basically
acquiring
the
Mosely
property
and
that's
where
I
talked
about
the
value
there.
The
books
on
the
market
value
is
$650,000.
Mr.
Mosely
based
his
appraisal,
law
of
property,
a
coma
as
I
believe
I
had
my
adjusted.
B
So
that's
where
we
are
with
that
I
just
want
to
put
that
in
as
a
caveat
when
we
talk
about
these
property
costs
that
one
we
for
what
the
avenues
call
down
as
a
retail
corridor,
so
we
would
provide
commercial
or
some
type
of
leasable
commercial
space
on
the
first
floor
on
4th
Avenue
and
it
would
wrap
along
on
1st
Street,
that's
fairly
proximate
to
the
small
commercial
area.
That's
not
far
for
the
restaurants
right
now
on
1st
Street.
B
So
this
this
locations
got
some
bang
for
the
buck,
but
again
providing
additional
parking
over
and
above
the
existing
amount
of
public.
Together
with
what
the
commercial
space
that
new
building
there
with
me,
you
have
to
look
outward
and
think
about
what
the
incentive
is
for
redevelopment
for
people
they
just
they
speak.
They
have
different
benefits,
but
it's
not
necessarily
Atlas
apples
comparison
and
the
last
one
again
is
the
whole
block
scenario
where
we
acquire
the
ritz
property
and
the
Mosley
property
would
get
500-550
spaces
and
that
may
get
along
a
little
bit.
A
And
I
was
using
more
realistic
numbers
because
I
had
been
personally
doing
some
inquiries
of
properties
myself,
so
I
was
using
some
more
real
estate
numbers
and
all
of
those
examples-
and
it's
just
just
quite
any
of
my
numbers.
So
you
know
I,
don't
just
count
on
me,
but
there
are
two
that
stood
out
the
most
to
me,
one
of
the
most
we
just
talked
about
how
we
do
not
include
risk
9
million
for
the
property
and
then
added
all
this
estimated
construction
costs,
and
that
would
be
one
lakh.
A
That
would
be
it's
about
$40,000
per
spot
and
you
get
340
spaces
in
addition
to
the
ones
that
we
have
and
then
the
other
one
is
the
one.
That's
been
brought
up
a
million
times
by
the
that's
a
city-owned
one,
just
about
of
the
green
and
that
one
comes
to
about
45,000
spot.
You
get
three
over
three
extra
spot.
A
A
Acquired
at
all
the
numbers,
those
two
are
the
ones
that
are
relatively
found
to
meet
personally
with
the
one
that's
over
by
fourth
and
the
pier
being
about
40,000
are
like
it's
like
$40,000
per
spot.
You
do
get
300
really
more
extra
spots
than
we
already
have
and
it's
essential.
We
could
use
those
spots
because
you
have
the
Builder
on
the
one
side.
That's
building
now
that
we
could
do
a
set
of
eyes
late
for
ballet.
You
have
the
met,
but
I
Metro,
it's
the
one
that
big
square
where
there
needs
to
be
nice.
Restaurants.
A
There
we
cap
I,
bring
in
more
incentives
for
that.
There's
lots
being
purchased
over
there,
where
maybe
we
can
do
incentives
where
we
set.
You
know
what
we'll
get
you
can
buy
out
of,
because
we're
parking
here
you
can
more
walk
space.
So,
if
we're
talking
about
the
group,
do
you
want
an
incentivizing
parking
lot
in
my
mind?
That's
the
lot
that
we
would
do
it
based
on.
F
A
It's
called
the
Ritz
that
lunch,
not
all
rich,
if
we're
sure
about
the
cinema,
faces
we're
talking
to
her
parking
space
that
one
makes
them
upset.
In
my
opinion,
if
we
look
at
just
having
a
lot
more
space
than
we
do,
a
big
thing
where
some
developer
can
come
and
say:
hey
is
space,
give
us
some
ideas
and
we
wonder
it's
not
an
incentive
tool
other
than
just
bringing
in
more
business
or
work
whatever.
Then,
the
south
of
the
pretty
is
I,
never
stood
that
one
is
45,000
completely
plausible
and.
B
A
D
D
B
F
A
I
said
it
multiple
times
we
were
trying
to
I
would
like
to
send
up,
be
friendly,
breezy,
more
trees,
space,
less
parking
spaces
and
every
single
place
that
we
develop.
I.
Think
that
if
we
have,
if
you
have
like
the
hookah
bar
that
Kant
developed,
it's
tough
to
be
more
than
what
it
is
now,
because
they
have
all
that
blank
parking
space
under
nothing,
the
demos
in
the
fight.
D
F
D
J
My
caveat
on
my
opinion
on
whether
we
go
forward
with
a
parking
garage
is:
it
was
filling
that
brush
I
do
not
agree
with
Chevy
500
park
more
parking
spots
downtown
just
to
maximize
the
amount
of
people
that
are
down
there
from
10:00
to
2:00
I.
Also,
don't
think
people
Justin
generally
Park
in
a
parking
garage
if
they
have
a
surface
block
option.
So
if
we
do
it
and
wherever
we
do
it,
I
will
only
support
it.
J
If
there's
some
sort
of
guaranteed
occupants
of
those
parking
spaces
and
to
me
exactly
what
Francis
was
saying,
is
we
somehow
say:
okay,
new
restaurant
or
new,
when
we
work
with
them
to
provide
that
part?
You
or
maybe
other
people
who
are
having
trouble
with
employee
parking,
can
somehow
buy
in
to
that
parking
garage
because
the
average
beach
goer
isn't
going
to
pull
into
a
parking
garage
to
go
to
the
beach.
J
J
J
F
B
We're
bound
by
our
comprehensive
keep
going
back
to
the
by
our
comprehensive
plan
and
by
our
core
contract
that
we
preserve
the
amount
of
part
of
beach
access
available
partner.
So
that's
one
thing:
we've
got
what
we
can't.
We
can't
erode
the
number
of
spaces.
We
have
convenient
partner
to
the
beach
now,
there's
no
definition
for
that.
I.
Don't
necessarily
personally
think
that
it's
something
between
3rd
and
2nd
Street
I,
don't
think.
B
J
B
B
On
First
Street
and
along
Latham
Plaza.
It
would
be
providing
a
plethora
of
excess
spaces,
I'm
thinking
it
would
preserve
the
existing
account
and
depending
on
whether
it's
hotels
or
a
combination
of
hotels,
apartments.
Whatever
that
may
be
all
it
can
handle
right
there
and
that
may
be
reasonable,
and
then
we
still
may
be
looking
at
a
different
location
for
a
smaller
incentivizing
lot.
I,
don't
know
that's
just
I'm
just.
A
Which
is
what
we're
trying
to
do
here?
They
have
a
lot
of
open
greasemonkey.
You
know
holding
things
where
you
want,
there's
trees
all
in
place.
You
can
walk
through
these
little
areas
and
have
this
little
chess
board
here,
just
little
things
next,
to
like
stuff
you'd
be
businesses,
but
there's
not
a
parking.
There's,
not
a
car
next
to
where
you're
sitting
or
there's
not
a
whole
lot
is
in
the
building,
because
there's
so
much
it
Teddy
Perkins.
A
B
The
last
thing
we're
going
to
talk
about
we
can
schedule
for
additional
Authority
was
be
Pepsi.
It's
got
some
homeless
stats
I
believe
you
got
the
documents
for
the
homeless
staff,
but
if
anything,
if
you
want
to
dish
more
than
what
you've
got
for
different
information
than
what
you've
got,
we
can
see
if
there's
other
information,
but
that's
what
we
Weatherly
have
available
at
the
local
homeless.
B
Well,
they're,
not
right
around
with
you,
follow
a
meeting
with
Parks
and
Rec
and
with
Public
Works
I'm
still
in
the
mind
right
now
that
and
I
still
have
not
identified
that
specific
position
with
those
job
descriptions
out
there
in
the
market,
I've
listed,
probably
30
other
cra-z.
It's
just
we're
looking
for
a
hybrid
job
that
doesn't
necessarily
exist
yet
so
I
have
my
ideas.
B
What
that
position
is
I'm
still
going
to
the
other
side,
so
I
understand
what
your
concerns
are
and
I
share
a
lot
of
those
concerns
their
stuff
that
can
be
fixed
now,
with
better
coordination,
without
necessarily
staffing
up
and
I'm,
not
reluctant
to
given
additional
people.
If
we
need
it,
I
mean
how
you
help
administer
the
CIA
period,
much
less
go
on
to
that
next
level.
Down
but
I'm
starting
thinking.
I'm
gonna
have
a
conversation
with
the
city
manager.
B
Let's
go
a
little
more
holistically
and
maybe
restructuring
the
CRE
from
the
ground
up
because
I
do
when
I
kick
it
up,
it's
not
an
excuse
or
anything,
but
we're
strapped
with
what
we
can
do
right
now
and
just
adding
another
person
at
that
intermediate
management
level.
I'm
not
really
prepared
to
do
that
at
this
point,
but
I
think
a
lot
of
your
concerns
will
be
ineffective
faculty.
They
will
be
addressed
just
through
our
existing
board.
B
B
B
J
B
Part
of
what
I
find
in
subordinate
positions
so
far
within
see
our
aides
are
much
more
professional
there
than
60
65
70
thousand
dollar
range,
and
that's
not
somebody.
We
want
their
programs
people,
they
do
project
management,
they
don't
do
this
on
the
streets
level.
I
looked
at
coj
I
forget
what
they
call
community
investment
yeah.
G
B
I
I
B
G
Company
conversations
that
bill
and
I
asked
that
in
tight
position
there
seems
to
be
two
grades
of
positions
and
CRNAs
those
that
are
higher
level,
an
entry
level
management.
So
you
know
one
of
the
conversations
he
had
was.
Is
it
a
deputy,
CRA
administrator,
that's
probably
too
high,
because
that's
more
of
an
office
relegated
job
and
you
get
special
projects,
then
there's
the
opposite
end
of
the
spectrum,
which
is
out
on
the
street
pressure
washing
actually
doing
the
work
that
needs
to
be
done
in
the
field.
So
not
we've
not
really
identified.
G
Category
we
can't
just
create
know
what
the
problem
is.
If
you
create
a
unicorn
trying
to
fill
the
unicorn
and
then
ultimately
trying
to
replace
the
universal
I,
call
it
the
unicorn,
because
the
reality
is
people
out
there
look
for
jobs,
they
look
for
a
job
that
is
mirrored
another
agency,
so
they
know
that
the
experience
they're
getting
is
transferable.
If
you
create
in
one
position,
is
one
unique
job
description
you
may
have
a
very
difficult
time
filling
it.