►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustments Committee Meeting 050819
Description
Board of Adjustments Committee Meeting 050819
A
A
B
The
record
here
we're
receiving
a
an
email
for
mr.
once
I
was
asking
to
be
excused
so
need
to
motion
on
that.
A
motion
to
approve
mr.
everyone
saw
this.
Is
he
had
business
meeting
in
San
Antonio,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
excuse
him
all
right,
no
way
down
to
the
first
side
of
misty
we
have
do.
We
have
any
thing
from
the
past
that
we
need
to
bring
up
just.
B
Written
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
second,
a
motion
and
second,
to
approve
the
minutes
as
presented
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
hi
any
opposed
motion
carries
moving
on
to
our
first
item.
We
have
a
request
submitted
by
robert
d
HR,
to
authorize
an
exception
of
the
literal
interpretation,
Lorado
court
of
code
of
ordinance,
section
28-30,
AE,
entitled
permanent,
signed
dimension.
All
premise
signs
by
granting
a
variance
to
the
minimum,
spacing
between
off-premise
signs
requirement
of
luck,
8,
a
block
1
River,
Hill
commercial,
located
at
4160
u.s.
B
D
B
Board
at
that
time,
where
we
had
an
issue
come
up
regarding
signs
and
I
for
one
I'm,
not
certain
that
this
board
is
authorized
to
make
it
to
make
decisions
when
it
comes
to
I.
Think
what
we're
talking
about
here,
the
Laurita
port
code
of
ordinance.
Now
last
time
it
was
brought
to
us
and
what
we
discussed
was
the
placing
of
the
sign
moving.
It
was
in
a
setback
and
it
needed
to
move
forward
a
little
bit
and
but
the
request
was
ordnance
were
I
mean,
was
setback
related.
It
wasn't
necessarily
ordinance
related.
D
D
And
I
wanted
to
call
your
attention
to
the
second
sentence.
A
variance
may
be
granted.
This
is
directly
out
of
the
Code
of
Ordinances
on
the
section
under
for
signage,
and
it
does
stipulate
that
a
variance
may
be
granted
by
the
Board
of
adjustments
where
the
little
literal
application
of
the
code
would
create
a
particular
hardship
for
the
sign
user
and
the
following
criteria
are
met.
So
what
it's
telling
us
first
of
all
is
that
there
there
must
exist,
a
hardship,
but
they
also
have
to
meet
the
succeeding
criteria.
D
Number
one,
a
literal
application
of
the
code
would
not
allow
the
property
to
be
used
at
its
highest
and
best
use
as
sown,
and,
of
course,
variances
cannot
be
granted
for
on
platic
property.
The
granting
of
the
requested
variance
would
not
be
much
good,
not
the
materially
detrimental
to
the
property
owners
in
the
vicinity
and
a
hardship
arising
for
the
sign
user
under
the
literal
interpretation
of
code
due
to
unusual
conditions,
visual
impairment
or
other
unique
conditions
to
the
property
not
caused
by
the
property
owner
that
do
not
apply
generally
to
the
city.
B
F
G
C
B
H
F
H
The
requirements
at
the
city
level
and
the
city
relax
the
ordinance
someone
on
primary
highways
and
federal
state
highway.
The
current
reg
is
that
you
can
only
locate
a
sign
within
well
greater
than
a
thousand
feet
from
another
sign
and
the
my
permit
has
been
granted
at
the
state
level,
but
not
at
the
city
level,
over
what
the
city
says.
It's
fifteen
feet.
The
footprint
on
a
sign
is
much
greater
than
fifteen
feet.
It
would
depend
on
where
you
measured
from
the
sign
I
mean
that's
how
close
it
is
from
one
side
to
another.
H
So
what
I'm
asking
for
is
a
if
the,
inter,
if
it
is
literally
correctly
fifteen
feet
out
of
a
thousand
feet,
it's
one
and
a
half
percent.
The
variance
is
what
I'm
asking
for
I'm,
not
asking
for
a
larger
sign,
I'm,
not
asking
to
be
in
the
setback
or
the
right-of-way,
or
anything
like
that.
It
is
what
Osseo,
during
his
tenure,
considered
a
very
insignificant
distance.
H
What
happens
in
on
this
roadway
is
that
I
do
feel
that
I
meet
all
of
the
criteria.
If
you
want
me
to
run
through
that
and
give
you
that
detail,
but
I
don't
want
you
to
think
it's
a
hundred
feet
or
200
feet,
I
mean
this
is
just
a
hair
and
it
would
depend
if
you
measured
from
a
light.
A
pole.
The
edge
of
the
sign
I
mean
it's,
that's
not
really
talked
about
in
the
ordinance.
H
It
is
a
textile
and
text
on
has
some
really
strict
requirements
as
if
we
drop
the
head
we
take
from
that
edge
and
we
have
to
be
a
certain
distance
from
the
right-of-way.
The
city
ordinance
just
says:
1000
feet
between
sides,
but
they
don't
say
where
you
measure
from
what
text
dot
does
and
I've
met
the
tech
stop
requirement
and
I
have
my
technical
did.
C
D
The
request
is,
the
distance
requirement
is
a
thousand
feet
between
science
and
we
have
representatives
from
the
building
department
to
explain
the
measurement
of
the
science
and
how
the
code
requires
us
to
measure.
So
the
variance
request
is
for
25
foot
variants,
the
distance
requirement
and
I
think
with
you,
showing
you
is
the
permit
application
and
probably
need
to
rotate
it
a
bit
the
it's
not
permit
application.
This.
D
H
H
H
H
J
Role
in
this
I
know
for
the
record
from
building
department.
One
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
point
out
the
city
organs.
You
must
get
a
city
permit
before
you
can
get
a
text
upcoming.
That's
one
of
the
things
that
stipulated
so
he's
still
trying
to
the
fact
that
he's
saying
that
he
has
a
textile
permit.
J
It's
it's
not
really
an
approval,
it's
really
just
they're
applying
for
it
if
it
complies,
but
the
other
thing
I
would
want
to
say,
besides
with
three,
what
he's
gotta
point
it
out,
that
the
three
other
criterias
is
that
by
granting
a
variance,
this
is
kind
of
you're,
basically
telling
the
state
doesn't
matter
that
you
have
a
thousand
feet
the
city
saying:
okay,
so
it
kind
of
goes
down.
The
path
like
I
realize
that
it's
a
small
amount
of
barriers
that
mr.
HR
is
requesting.
J
D
Think
the
point
of
it
is
is
that
they
do
need
to
meet
the
city's
requirements
that
the
the
tech
start
requirements
for
granting
of
their
permit
is
dependent
on
them
meeting
the
city's
requirements.
So
the
state
is
is
saying
you
City
we're
not
going
to
abrogate
your
authority
to
regulate
science
within
your
jurisdiction,
and
we
will
you
know,
because
the
tech
side
is
a
state.
B
H
Time,
unlike
what
you've
heard
here,
all
I
do
is
deal
with
textile.
This
gentleman
has
a
lot
of
duties.
This
is
all
I
do
for
a
living.
Txdot
rule
is
300
feet.
The
city
rule
is
three
times
stiffer
than
text
art.
Rule
I
have
been
granted
a
text
on
permit
text
on,
says
independent
of
week.
What
we
do
you
have
to
go,
get
your
city
permit,
it's
not
one
link
to
the
other.
It
is
I,
either
comply
or
I'm,
going
to
get
fined
by
the
city
or
I'm
gonna
get
fined
by
textile.
H
J
B
J
H
B
G
K
H
D
If,
on
the
second
page
of
that
same
application,
if
you
look
at
the
very
bottom
or
just
by
submitting
the
application,
the
second
bullet
point
it.
It
stipulates
that
by
issuance
of
a
garment
text
that
does
not
represent
that
the
sign
or
location
thereof,
meet
city,
county
and
or
local
government
laws,
orders,
ordinances
or
the
regulations.
You.
B
C
H
H
C
C
D
H
C
B
A
J
Was
a
I
want
to
say
a
year
long
with
these?
What
six
months
workshops
every
two
weeks,
mr.
Charles
president
I,
would
say
most
of
them
and
in
depth
defining
what
a
sign
is,
what
the
use
was
and
why
the
distances
he
used
to
be
1500
thing.
They
Nord
it
to
a
thousand,
and
what
I
can
tell
you-
and
this
is
why
Planning
Department
asked
me
to
speak.
J
H
Many
ten
thousand
eight
hundred
said
I
take
these
rules
literally.
That
was
incorrect,
I'm
in
the
sign
business
and
we
are
allowed
to
be
larger
and
we
are
allowed
to
do
certain
things
that
other
people
cannot
do
because
ladybird
Johnson
during
her
tenure
said
we're
gonna,
have
a
Highway
Beautification
out
I'm
allowed
to
do
certain
things
on
my
sign
that
others
are
not
I'm
allowed
to
be
larger,
but
much
less
frequent
and
that's
the
way
the
state
controls
me
and
the
city's
kind
of
one
along
with
that.
So
that
is
the
reason.
H
C
Not
that
that's
well
as
you're
driving
and
you're
looking
at
a
sign
and
there's
one
right
next
to
it.
Your
eyes
are
off
the
road
for
longer
periods
of
time
and
for
a
while
there
I
think
the
city
wasn't
allowing
electronic
signs,
because
people
would
stare
as
you're
driving
the
stare
at
the
sign.
You
see
what
the
next
it
is,
but
now
they
they
allow
it.
But
that's
what
you
know.
The
distance
requirement
is
some.
B
It,
but
in
any
case
in
any
case,
but
we
understand
what
you're
saying,
but
in
any
case
we're
either
talking
about
a
very
variance,
is
necessary
to
either
be
5
feet,
15
feet
or
25
feet
either
way
well,
either
way,
so
it
doesn't
make
a
difference
where
they're
measuring
it
from
either
way
it's
less
than
a
thousand.
If.
H
J
This
section
up
here
where
the
parking
lot
is,
that
would
be
the
other
property
that
is
so.
You
can
see,
he's
basically
trying
to
put
it
as
far
away
as
possible
to
try
to
meet
the
thousand
feet
right.
So
he
just
can't
achieve
it
and
we
don't
have
the
oh
it's
15
feet.
Let
me
let
me
go
ahead
and
grant
you
the
permit.
We
don't
have
that
authority
right,
where's.
F
G
G
J
G
G
B
M
If
we
were
there
actually
at
the
site-
and
this
is
the
the
which
you're
talking
about
okay-
what
we
would
do
is
measure
from
the
outside
of
the
sign.
This
is
how
it's
supposed
to
be
the
outside
of
the
sign
to
the
inside
of
the
other
side
that
would
be
on
center,
but
as
we
don't
go
out
there,
we
just
measure.
B
Think
what
we're
talking
here
is.
Yes,
we
understand
that
there's
going
to
be
a
variance
needed
either
way,
whether
it
be
15
or
25,
but
I,
don't
know,
I
understand
there.
Rules
are
a
thousand
their
rules
right.
The
city
rules
state
a
thousand
whatever,
whatever
techstop
does
that's
different?
What
it's
not
working?
It's
right,
we're
not
interested
in
that
right
now,
but
my
question
to
them
is:
are
we
are
we
arguing
over
something
that
we
really
should
not
be
arguing
over
is
maybe
the
unit
of
measure
where
we're
we're
measuring
from?
B
Maybe
you
are
in
compliance
either
way
in
my
opinion
and
then
and
right
now,
we'll
discuss
it
after
the
public
hearing.
But
in
my
opinion,
honestly
we're
looking
at
such
a
small
amount
that
it
could
be
that
if
it
was
measured
a
different
way,
it
would
be
in
compliance
so
that
having
having
said
that,
if
there
any
other
questions
for
Robert,
mr.
Tuerck
now
I
need
a
motion
to
close
the
public
everyone
to
have
a
motion
in
a
second
to
close
the
public
area.
B
F
C
G
G
Well
here
we
have
a
measurement
sign,
pull
the
sign
pole
yet
on
a
we
just
have
measured
along
and
across
well,
maybe
maybe
we
need
to
insert
some
language
in
there
clear
that
it
should
be
from
time
poolside
pool,
because
now
you
start
talking
about
the
edge
of
the
sign
or
the
light
pole
or
other
things.
It
really
should
be
the
side
forward
to
the
side.
Pole,
I'm.
K
G
G
B
Don't
know
that,
that's
that's
the
reason
that
we're
here,
because
of
because
what
has
come
up
here
is
if
we
look
at
the
way
its
measured,
it's
not
real
clear.
If
it
was
clear,
then
it
may
be
in
compliance.
So
anyway,
I'm
gonna
call
the
call
the
question
to
call
the
motion.
I
have
a
motion
and
a
second
to
approve
the
variance
request
with
not
to
exceed
not
to
exceed
25
feet,
and
if
you
want
to
add.
C
G
B
Understand
the
question
that's
been
come
up
all
right.
The
the
motion
is
to
approve
the
variance
not
to
exceed
25
from
Center
Pole
to
Center
Pole,
that's
correct,
all
those
in
favor
aye
any
opposed
I
motion,
I'm,
not
saying
mr.
chair
right.
Let
let
the
record
reflect
the
miss
of
the
vote.
Abstains
all
right
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Thank.
H
G
A
E
L
C
B
B
Okay,
vo
a
14
on
the
trucks
request
submitted
by
lorry
no
outlet,
shoppers
to
authorize
an
exception
to
the
literal
interpretation,
Laredo
code
of
ordinance,
section,
28,
38
be
entitled
bourbon
and
some
dimensions
attached
by
granting
of
variance
of
the
minimum
square
footage
requirement
of
the
total
wall
area
facing
a
public
or
private
street.
Whichever
is
greater
located
at
1600
Water
Street
Laredo
outlet.
Shoppers
is
there
anybody
here
to
speak
on
the
behalf.
K
K
I,
don't
know
if
you're
familiar
with
the
shops,
but
what
we've
done
is
painted
over
those
and
they're
all
now
blank
face,
and
what
we
would
like
to
do
is
is
put
signage
branding
on
the
walls
similar
to
about
ninety
percent
of
other
outlet
malls,
but
the
particular
job
that
will
hopefully
increase
awareness
and
sales
in
the
area
on
those
surfaces.
My
understanding
is
that
we
have
thank
you
so
much
the
we
have
we're
allowed
5%
I,
understand
of
the
face
faces
of
those
buildings
and
we're
looking
at
approximately
28.
K
F
D
Greater
I
think
it
says,
whichever
is
greater
and
we
had
posted
the
square
footage
of
the
wall
area.
The
applicant
did
give
us
the
wall
area
for
the
south-facing
facade.
However,
we
would
need
the
wall
areas
for
the
buildings
facing
east
and
west
and
the
North
facing
facade
in
order
to
give
accurate
calculations
of
what
would
be
the
five
percent
of
the
total.
In
most
cases,
most
buildings
face
possibly
want
one
or
possibly
two
streets,
but
in
this
case
it
faces
four
streets,
so
we
would
need.
D
We
need
a
little
bit
more
information
to
give
accurate
calculations
on
the
the
square
footage
of
what
exactly
we
may
be
in
a
situation
where
they
may
be
in
compliance,
so
that
we
asked
for
some
more
information
yesterday
they
were
able
to
give
us
some
dimensions,
but
again
it
was
still
only
the
south
facing
wall.
So.
D
A
E
L
A
K
B
G
F
G
A
D
G
D
G
B
The
fact
that
we
have
we
have
signage
on
on
the
end
over
there,
where
it
says
Nike,
yeah,
I,
guess
that
becomes
now
part
of
the
sign.
Am
I
correct,
and
then
that
would
be
then
the
same
would
happen
on
the
next
sign
over
the
red
because
it
since
it
was
since
it
did
exist
on
on
Nike.
The
word
Nike
is
go
to
the
left
right
below,
where
it
says
outlet
that
red
area
right
there
would
also
be
considered
part
of
the
sign.
My
right.
F
D
B
And
and
I'm
sorry,
but
it
would
seem
to
me
that
before
something
like
this
comes
up
to
us
that
we
would
have
the
facts
if
we're
gonna
figure
something
out
on
5%
on
the
amount
of
square
footage
that
we
would
know
what
the
dimensions
are,
and
you
know
I'm
not
I'm,
not
one
to
say,
let's
guess
and
figure
out
or
take
somebody's
word
for
it.
We
have
to
have
actual
facts.
That's.
D
B
C
B
Would
I
would
be
I
would
be
the
one
to
say,
I
think
we
need
to
wait
until
we
get
more
information,
but
the
information
we
need
is
a
is
the
north
side
a
sign?
Is
it
considered
a
sign?
Well,
if
it
is
not
considered
a
sign,
it
don't
were
only
we're
only
dealing
with
the
square
footage
of
the
south
side.
If
we're
dealing
with
the
south
side,
then
we
need
to
get
measurements.
What
is
length
and
width
height
the
whole
thing
to
where
we
come
up
with
square
footage
there.
A
G
F
G
F
K
A
G
D
G
We're
trying
to
get
a
Mort
more
wall
in
there
by
using
the
north
side
and
saying
there's
a
wall
over
there,
but
we're
not
going
to
use
that
wall.
We're
gonna,
put
it
all
on
the
south
side.
Well
that
what
wouldn't
even
come
into
play.
That's
it
that's
my
phone,
I
I
mean
I.
Don't
think
that
measure
it
should
even
be
included.
D
L
G
G
G
D
B
Faces
but
okay
public
street
would
here
advertising.
It
would
seem
to
me
that
the
the
sign
the
street
that
we're
talking
about
is
the
street,
where
the
sign
is
facing
correct.
So
if
you're
talking
about
facing
a
public
or
private
street,
it
would
seem
to
me
the
street
that
is
in
front
of
the
sign
or
not
it's
not
a
street.
That's
back
over
there
on
the
other
side
facing
another
wall,
I
mean
I'd.
B
B
Not
it's
not
an
interpretation
that
we
there's
no
guidance.
We
have
no
guidance
from
city
to
tell
us
which
Street
we're
talking
about
to
me.
That's
logical
what
we're
talking
about,
but
if
you
want
to
get
us
some
guidance,
we're
gonna
wait
anyway.
These
were
look.
Iii,
don't
want
to
proceed
with
this
until
we
get
actual
measurements.
What
is
the
length?
C
D
C
B
F
K
L
K
K
Our
only
thing
is
that
we'll
try
to
your
crease
sales,
it
will
help,
will
help
the
city,
it's
something
that
is
done
around
the
nation.
The
same
way,
the
four-sided
walls
there's
the
rendering
I
think
it's
an
attractive
rendering
of
a.
We
were
not
happy
with
the
the
color
blocks
that
were
on
there
did.
They
had
no
purpose
for
us,
and
maybe
we
should
have
done
this
before
building
yes,
but
you
know
this
is
already.
B
Anybody
have
any
other
questions
for
no
I
need
a
motion
to
close
the
public
hearing
and
a
second
to
close
the
public
hearing,
all
those
in
favor
aye.
Any
opposed
motion
carries
all
right.
Gentlemen,
based
on
that,
what
are
we
gonna
do?
It
would
seem
obvious
to
me
that
we're
looking
at
just
we're
looking
at
a
request
of
28%
when
the,
when
the
ordinance
calls
for
five
I
can't
think
of
any
criteria.
L
I
would
be
applied
to
approve
it
myself
of
the
electing
that
they
advertise
me.
We
don't
want
to
come
all
this
cut
down
either
and
if
this
improve
sales-
and
maybe
it's
a
marketing
tool
for
all
the
vendors
that
are
there,
you
may
still
have
empty
spaces
there
that
need
to
be
filled
at
the
same
time,
so
I
mean
mine,
I,
guess
if
it's
something
that
is
done
in
other
cities
and
and
I
do
believe
we
have
the
authority
to
grant
this
type
of
variance
they're,
not
erecting
any
kind
of
sign
into
themselves.
A
L
L
C
Normally
I
would
say:
I
would
be
against
it,
because
I
hate
to
go
from
five
to
twenty
eight
percent,
which
is
outrageous
in
anything.
But
the
fact
of
the
matter
is:
it's
painted
already.
You've
already
got
black
or
you
had
squares,
colorful
squares
on
it.
So
if
they
didn't
put
the
signs
the
names
of
the
companies
there,
they
could
still
get
approval
and
paint
it
pink
and
blue
and
we
would
never
have
any
option
if
it's
a
blank
wall
the
blank.
C
B
It
I
accept
what
you're
saying,
but
at
the
same
time
there
are
ordinances
out
there
for
a
reason,
that's
correct
this,
that's
grand
and
if
we,
if
we
start,
if
we
start
accepting
or
granting
variances
based
on
just
because
somebody
asked
for
it,
then
I
don't
think
we're
doing
our
due
diligence.
But
you're
gonna
make
a
motion.
They'll
make
a
look.
Unless
you
with
me
to
approve
you,
have
a
motion
to
approve
I,
don't
need
a
motion
and
a
second
to
approve
any.
G
F
C
G
The
other
part
of
this
is
you
know
that
the
walls
face
Mexico,
they
don't
face
any
other
Street,
no
other
thoroughfare
other
than
sonic.
Well,
so,
with
friends
along
the
river,
you
know,
as
mr.
Norton
said,
you
know
we
we
have
to
understand
that
these
guys
need
a
little
help
in
what
they're
doing
over
there
and
it's
really
not
facing
anything
else
other
than
Mexico.
So,
but
the
only.
C
G
C
L
Understand
that
the
issues
of
the
black
and
white
ordinances
that
are
in
place,
I
also
feel
that
I
mean
like
sort
of
what
was
saying.
I
mean
like
to
some
degree
I,
don't
know
how
much
that
degrees
up
here.
It's
about
23%,
more
okay
from
your
signage,
okay,
I
think.
That's
mr.
North
was
also
kind
of
had
an
issue
with,
but
I
also
kind
of
feel
like.
There
are
some
economic
issues,
I'm
not
saying
that's
the
only
deciding
factor
but
I'm
saying
that
that's
something
that
I
put
into
the
basket
to
kind
of
like.
B
J
Most
on
the
street,
since
you're
driving
down
the
street,
you
don't
want
to
have
this
huge
sign
on
a
building,
but
the
intent
here
is
basically
from
the
bridge,
which
is
a
very
long
distance,
which
that's
really
where
they're
trying
to
the
only
issue
we
are.
Is
that
it
really?
We
can't
say
yes,
no,
no,
and
the
point
is
the
5%
was
when
you're
driving
down
you
don't
want
to
have
this
huge
deal
on
a
on
a
wall.
B
C
B
We
cannot
do
something
conditionally.
The
next
person
is
going
to
come
said,
wait
a
minute.
You
did
this
one.
Now
we
can,
in
the
back
of
our
own
minds,
use
the
criteria
that
you
just
mentioned
that
this
is
facing
south
this.
You
cannot
see,
there's
not
enough
of
a
private
or
public
street
or
thoroughfare
through
there
to
where
it's
really
going
to
be
affected.
We
could
use
that,
but
still
the
fact
remains
that
it's
an
ordinance
we're
accepting
of
areas
so
anyway,.
D
Any
other
discussion
I
just
that
the
code
does
prescribe
the
criteria
for
granting
variances
for
signs,
and
those
are
the
very
same
ones
that
we
mentioned
in
the
previous
case,
where
it
doesn't
create
a
hardship
and
does
it
meet
the
three
succeeding
criteria?
Does
it
it
wouldn't
allow
for
the
property,
be
used
for
its
highest
best
used
as
owned?
Would
it
create,
with
the
granting
of
the
variance
presentment
to
be
materially
detrimental
to
you,
know
surrounding
property
owners
and
there's
a
hardship
arise
from
and
you
have
them
before?
You
just
thought.
I
would.
G
K
C
C
B
Like
based
on
that,
it
is
that
they,
whatever
whatever
we
approved
today,
is
just
this.
Yes,
if
you
were
to
come
back
for
something
else,
other
words
we
can
look
at
it
as
being
okay,
wait
a
minute.
You
are
facing
a
more
bit
of
busier
Street,
so
that
does
have
a
little
weight
here
so
anyway,
I
need
to
call
the
questions,
because
one
court
to
death.
C
B
C
You
know
it's
gonna
be
approved
if
we
approve
one
you're
gonna
prove
the
other,
but
my
point
is:
if
you
want
to
regulate
the
size
of
the
signs,
you
can
do
it
easily
by
saying:
okay,
we'll
give
you
five
percent
or
we'll
give
you
10%
of
the
entire
building.
So
the
B
comes
back
and
says:
okay,
the
entire
building
is.
Ninety
thousand
I
want
nine
thousand
feet
instead
of
twenty
three
fine
I
want
to
put
it
all,
there
put
it
all
there,
but
he
can't
come
back
again.
This
is
already
met
their
total
requirement.
We.
K
D
L
K
K
B
B
B
It's
a
separate
application,
because
so
what
we're
dealing
with
right
now
is
what
is
in
front
of
us
right
here.
Okay,
all
right,
I
need
to
call
the
question
here.
I
think
there's
been
a
motion
in
a
second
and
a
second
to
accept
the
the
variance
has
as
stated
right.
Yes,
sir.
Okay,
we've
already
gone
through
questions
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
aye
any
opposed.