►
From YouTube: Laredo Board of Adjustment Meeting, 08/08/2018
Description
City of Laredo Board of Adjustment Meeting held on August 8, 2018.
A
C
D
F
G
B
B
The
staff
to
give
us
the
ones
that
are
the
pending
boa
orders,
the
only
one
that
I
see
according
to
I,
know
that
we
have
outstanding
right
now
is
number
three
under
report.
Boa
23-20
is
17.
B
G
G
But
this
was
a
new
construction
and
it
did
pass
on
all
inspections
from
the
building
department
and
then
they
I'm,
assuming
when
they
were
gonna
close
on
the
property.
They
realized
that
there
was
an
encroachment.
So
they
came
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment
for
a
variance,
but
they
did
not
get
that
variance
so
I'm
checking
with
the
legal
department
I
emailed
them
waiting
a
response
on
from
them
to
see
whether
they
are
gonna
revoke
the
certificate
of
occupancy
or
how
they're
gonna
proceed,
whether
they're
gonna
start.
The
legal
I.
B
B
G
A
B
B
Right
because
now
we
need
to
make
certain
in
our
mind
staff,
we
need
to
make
certain
that,
if
everybody
involved
in
the
process,
meaning
the
people
to
grant
the
certificate
of
occupancy
and
everybody
else
that
they're
aware
of
what's
happening
here,
because
if
we
deny
something
they've
got
to
make
certain
that
they
follow
suit
these.
If
they
issue
a
certificate
of
occupancy,
then
we
have
a
whole
new
battle
later
on.
H
C
Like
a
there's
like
a
missed,
shot
they're
in
communication
or
something
with
late
from
you
guys,
I
mean
I'm,
not
putting
the
blame
on
you.
People
but
I'm,
just
saying
on
the
staff
here
but
like
for
the
building
department
itself,
they're
the
one
that
issued
the
certificate
of
occupancy
correct
right.
G
C
So
somewhere
in
there
there
has
to
be
some
kind
of
checklist
to
make
sure,
especially
when
there's
an
issue
where,
whether
it's
one
foot
or
three
feet
or
10
feet
or
whatever
that
you
know
they
were
not
approved
for
a
variant
so
like.
In
other
words,
what
it
says
is
the
ordinance
applies
and
if
you're
encroaching,
then
we
can't
grant
you
a
certificate
of
occupancy
and
so
either
get
a
variant
or
you
make
a
change
on
the
building
and
I.
B
Think,
probably
the
best
way
on
that
would
be
to
make
certain
that
if
you
will
visit
with
them
or
if
you
want,
we
can
visit
with
them
before
they
issue
a
certificate
of
occupancy,
that
they
have
a
document
from
Lenny's
zoning
or
building
department,
stating
that
if
they
had
requested
a
variance,
it
was
either
accepted
or
denied.
So
they
either
they
either
have
to
have
one
or
the
other,
and
if
they
don't
have
that,
but
they
know
that
there
was
an
issue
with
the
day
requested,
a
variance.
B
They
should
not
issue
a
certificate
of
occupancy
until
they
have
in
their
files
needs
from
you
either.
Something
of
writing
yeah
your
night,
all
right.
Okay,
well,
that
I
just
wanted
to
update
on
that
one.
Now,
the
last
one
on
26
2017,
the
property
owner,
has
not
corrected
the
structure
and
a
citation
has
been
issued
again,
which
one
is
this
number
four.
On
the
on
the
report.
Boa
26,
2017
page
for
the.
B
Remember
that
one
of
the
things
that
we
agreed
on
when
we
met
with
the
sit
with
the
hold
staff
that
day
was
that
we
give
them
30
days
after
30
days.
If
they
do
not
do
anything
with
that
citation,
we
have
to
and
we're
obligated
to
report
it
to
legal
said
we
then
legal
takes
their.
They
take
the
issue
of
that.
G
C
G
G
I
B
First,
item
on
the
agenda
is
a
request
submitted
by
Ekta
that
meant
to
authorize
it
exception.
The
literal
interpretation
and
Loretta
land
development
code,
section
24,
77,
entitled
dimensional
standard
by
granting
a
variances
setback
requirements
on
lot,
37
block
6
the
lady
I'ts
subdivision,
located
at
39
14
Chevron
get
her
out
the
wrong,
but.
J
B
G
F
D
F
B
All
right,
we
start
over
again
requests
submitted
by
one
effort,
though,
to
authorize
an
exception.
Literal
interpretation
of
Loretto,
the
land
development
code,
section
24,
77
and
title
dimensional
Senate
by
granting
a
variance
to
setback
requirements
on
lock
to
block
13
Freedom
Park
subdivision
phase
4
located
826
withers
Hulu.
Is
there
anybody
here
to
speak
on
behalf.
D
K
Ahead
and
state
your
name
good
morning,
members
of
the
board,
my
name-
is
Quan
M
fratello
I
live
on
a
26
wheeler
spoon.
I
am
a
cop
I'm
here
in
the
army
since
1998.
This
is
my
current
ID,
my
service-connected
disability
card.
The
reason
why
presenting
you
this
is
so
you
can
have
an
understanding
on
my
case
house,
88
Witherspoon.
There
is
pace
to
peel
the
front.
It's
very
bill
is
not
even
possible.
K
I
have
one
car
garage,
I'm
still
serving
the
military
right
now,
and
the
most
reasonable
construction
to
do
was
to
the
survey
house,
which
I
will
use
to
storage
my
vehicles
when
I
need
to
go
on
on
military
training,
which
I
just
came
back
four
o'clock
this
morning.
Also
I'm
a
IMAP
diagnosed
with
PTSD
I'd
have
two
dogs
hasta
stock,
which
is
Huskies
day.
They'll
call
whether
you
also
use
that
that's
out
the
roof,
so
they
can.
K
My
dogs
can
go
in
and
out
when
I
have
to
go
on
for
two
days
or
one
days,
whatever
I
need
to
have
done.
I
Drive
to
my
training,
all
the
way
to
El
Paso
when
I
have
to
leave
for
extended
period
of
time.
My
my
brother,
my
knees
come
to
the
house,
you
know
give
him
some
water
to
the
dogs
and
everything,
but
I
cannot
leave
them
inside
the
cage
in
cows
because
it
is
so
it's
too
much
time
or
inside
house,
because
they
will
destroy
that
always
too
hot.
K
For
my
two
dogs,
my
two
dogs
come
me
to
deal
with.
My
PTSD
symptoms
are
like
sometimes
I
have,
and
that's
the
reason
why
I'm
asking
to.
Let
me
have
that
and
addition
to
that
I
know.
Two
wrongs
don't
make
one
right:
there
are
some
properties
around
a
little
south
that
to
me
exceeded
picture
day
exceeded
the.
K
If
you
allow
me
to
present
exceeded
the
VESA
standard,
which
I
wasn't
aware
of
due
to
that
allowed
years
and
I've
been
in
the
military
living
on
post
on
base
or
anatomic
copies,
so
I
never
had
to
deal
with
a
construction
of
my
house
which
I
own
since
2006,
then
I
have
to
redeploy
you
to
work
with
status.
This
is
one
of
houses
that
I
found
somewhere
in
the
area.
K
K
How
is
it's
on
it's
on
the
wall
same
thing,
that's
another
one
that
has
all
the
way
to
only
sitting
on
the
wall,
which
is
not
the
case
on
my
property,
that's
another
one
that
sits
right
there
on
the
right
on
on
this
side,
which
is
let's
say
in
my
case.
That's
not.
The
decay
in
my
case
is
not
case
that
the
roof
is
within
sight
of
the
limitation
of
the
property
and
I'd,
say
I
know
two
wrongs.
B
I'm,
sorry,
is
there
any
way
to
reduce
the
amount
they
hear
you're
going
from
a
five
foot
setback,
which
is
really
what
what
it
called
for?
Okay,
you're
requesting
to
go
to
a
zero
foot,
setback
and
I
know
speaking
for
myself
on
this
on
this
board,
I
have
a
real
problem
going
to
zero
zero
setback,
you're
going
all
the
way
to
your
property
line.
If
you
were
to
go
some
portion
of
that,
it's
a
little
bit
more
tolerable,
not
saying
that
it
would
be
accepted,
but
it's
a
little
bit
easier
to
understand.
B
D
I
A
I
A
B
G
K
F
C
K
C
Service,
sir,
and
that
you're
doing
that,
and
no
we
understand
all
that
and
that
and
I
think
that
and
try
to
make
it
clear.
We
understand
that
infractions
have
taken
place
in
neighborhoods,
some
of
them
before
a
lot
of
these
sources
were
created,
some
of
them
that
people
just
did
on
their
own
we're
really
not
judging
them.
We
can
only
judge
the
case,
that's
in
front
of
us
so
like
we
have
to
try
to
take
it
that
way
and
work
with
you
as
best
we
can,
but
it's
not
a
reflection.
H
B
F
J
A
C
B
J
D
B
F
B
I,
look
at
I
look
at
the
one
of
the
pictures
that
is
above
there
and
I
see
how
close
it
is
that
roof
line
with
the
other
roof
line
next
door,
and
it's
hard
for
me
to
to
approach
that
because
I'm
thinking,
that's
a
fire
department
of
fire
hazard
with
that
roof
line
being
so
close,
I
would
be
inclined
to
accept,
or
you
know,
to
undertake
a
lesser
amount
than
the
requested
amount.
If,
if
you
all
look
at
I
mean,
is
there
any
anybody
comment
on
that?
Well,.
C
B
C
L
L
The
penis
that
are
the
condoms,
if
you
more
there's
gonna,
be
like
these
are
ready
both
one
feet.
That
might
be
it's
not
other
that
whether
it
has
so
it's
most
already
won't
read
the
columns
so
now
I,
say
and
from
the
side.
It's
a
this
move
another
feet:
where
were
the
content
portal,
so
you're
talking
about
just
seven
feet?
The
cart
just
goes
in.
Thank
you.
B
Understand
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
I
think
it's
a
consensus
of
the
board,
even
though
we
have
not
voted
on
it.
It's
a
consensus
of
this
board.
Normally
a
zero
setback
is
not
acceptable,
so
we're
trying
to
find
a
solution
here
so
between
saying
from
zero
and
not
authorizing
it
or
allowing
something
our
idea
is
to
allow
something
so
I
mean
that's
what
we're
that's.
L
D
D
I
K
A
C
J
C
So
then
he
would
be
requesting
not
to
zero.
If
we
I
mean
from
the
where
the
column
line
is
it's
one
foot
from
the
property
line?
Mm-Hmm,
yes,
but
the
roof
goes
over
to
the
property
line.
Well,
I'm.
What
could
he
demolish
that?
You
know
and
I
mean
saying
and
then
we're
saying
like
well
he's
one
foot
run
to
zero.
C
You
know
I
mean
I'm
just
talking
out
loud
I'm,
not
making
a
motion,
but
I'm
just
I
wanted
to
know
what
the
distance
was
from
the
column,
yeah
the
property
line,
and
if
the
actual
demolition
took
place
from
from
the
pole
from
the
pole
and
then
you
kind
of
have
you
know
you
demolish
that
part,
and
you
just
you
finish
it
out
right
there
with
it.
Where
the
column
is
I,
don't
know,
that's
possible.
You.
B
D
D
K
B
Be
honest
with
you,
those
columns
in
my
opinion
would
have
to
be
moved
because
those
are
much
too
close
to
the
property
line,
especially
with
the
roof
line.
Move
it
up
a
little
bit
then
get
a
little
in
the
other
way.
The
other
way.
So
you
can
see
there,
you
can
see
the
roof
line
right
over
the
fence,
and
that
is
a
zero
setback
and,
and
that
is
not
acceptable
for
the
for
this
board.
J
D
A
K
K
B
I
D
C
I
G
C
D
D
C
C
C
So
so,
when,
when
people
come
to
us
for
our
variances,
because
they're
exceeding
what
the
limits
are,
is
that
correct,
okay,
so
like,
in
my
view,
I,
would
make
a
motion
if
you'd
be
willing
to
cut
back
that
one
foot
and
just
grant
him
a
one
foot
variance
okay,
so
that
he
would
not
be
zero?
That
would
be
my
motion.
Okay,
whether
it
gets
a
second
or
not
that's
fine
I
would
do
that
because
we
have
the
authority
to
grant
additional
variance
if
the
board
so
chooses
so,
but
individually
doing.
B
C
Yes,
I
would
have
to
go
to
a
demolition
demolition
permit
and
he
would
have
to
go
back
with
at
least
a
setback
Oh
at
least
one
foot.
He
would
not
be
back
to
zero
or
the
college
and
I
would
always
suggest
that
he
put
a
rain
gutter
up
there
so
that
his
water
runoff,
when
it
does
rain,
is
not
falling
into
his
neighbor.
It
is
gonna,
have
a
rain,
a.
C
D
D
A
C
Okay,
well,
if
I'm,
my
understanding
is
that
these
columns
are
one
foot
from
the
property
line.
Okay,
so
that
I
would
be
willing
to
make
this
I'm
making
this
motion
and
the
understanding
that
he
would
be
willing
to
do
that.
One
foot
demolition
of
the
overhang,
that's
there,
so
that
everything
comes
back
to
that
one
foot
level.
You
know
what
I'm
saying
that
so
that
we
were
granting
him
up
to
one
feet.
That's
really
my
motion
I
understand
and
these
recommendations
that
I
may
not
have
that
expertise,
but
I'm,
that's
really!
I
C
F
B
J
B
One
thing
we
have
to
be
very
careful,
though,
when
when
we
do
something
like
I
mean
it
was
my
understanding
before
that,
if
they
came
to
ask
for
something
we
could
either
deny
it
or
accept
it
yeah,
but
I
was
told
no
that
we
can
go
ahead
and
make
it.
The
only
thing
you
have
to
be
very
careful
is
that
he
was
very
clear
in
the
approval
document
what
it
is
as
being
requested.
C
What
I
mean
I
think
to
be
fair
to
the
Chairman
you're
gonna
have
to
request
you're
gonna
have
to
go
and
submit
a
demolition
permit.
Okay,
to
push
that
thing,
you're
the
roof
back.
Okay,
you
have
to
go
through
the
procedure,
submit
your
roof
and
she
will
explain
to
you.
Okay
and
you've
already
stated
that
you
want
to
put
a
rain
gutter
up
there.
Who'd
say
that
you're,
not
the
runoff,
when
it
rains,
is
not
going
into
your
neighbor's
yard.
Yes,.