►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting, 09/12/2018
Description
Board of Adjustment Meeting of September 12, 2018 was held at the City of Laredo City Council Chambers at 12 noon.
A
B
C
E
A
A
Any
questions
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
go
to
clubs.
I
have
a
motion
to
close
second,
a
motion,
a
second
to
close,
the
public
hearing,
all
those
in
favor
all
right
discussion,
no
okay,
I
mean
thank
you,
sir.
Having
said
that,
I
be
honest
with
you.
I
can't
see
where
this
is
would
be
an
issue,
a
problem
at
least
doing
the
wanting
to
keep
on
the
same
on
the
same
line
is
the
original
home.
There.
E
G
G
A
A
H
E
F
H
A
Sorry
about
that,
we
didn't
ask
your
name,
but
we
just
asked
of
legal
was
here,
so
we're
going
to
table
that
whoever
is
here
on
that
one
or
two
table
that
one
until
the
next
meeting
until
we
get
further
information,
no
offense
and
wasting
our
time
or
your
time,
all
right.
Moving
on
to
item
number
three:
what
submitted
by
Jason
Fuentes
authorized
an
exception
of
the
literal
interpretation
Laurita
line
development
code,
section
24,
77
entitled
dimensional
standards
by
granting
a
variance
for
the
setback
requirements
of
the
West.
A
A
B
We
have
an
issue
because
we're
looking
at
the
property
and
this
property
was
conveyed
to
mr.
Fuentes,
but
it
was
not
replanted
and
in
order
for
property
to
be
properly
so
divided,
it
needs
to
go
through
a
process
of
rewriting.
The
process
of
replanting
does
require
four
properties
to
have
an
access,
easement
access
to
a
public
right
away,
in
which
this
case
they
will
have.
B
I
A
A
J
Just
won
permission
to
between
your
building
on
his
home.
We
have,
we
had
a
permit
taken
out
for
this
building.
The
building
is
only
24
feet
wide.
We
only
used
in
the
filter
as
as
it
was,
which
is
houses
about.
It
was
really
old.
We
start
next
time
they
can
taking
it
down
and
the
process
it
was
irrelevant.
He'll
do
with
everything
rotted,
so
we're
not
down
with
hammer
actually
fell
or
down
and
we'd
want
to
use
the
foundation
as
it
was
just
to
build
it
as
it
was
before.
J
J
B
G
E
L
A
J
B
A
J
E
J
J
Okay,
take
a
walk,
no
rooms,
gonna
fall
off.
You
walk
in
front
when
you
first
walked
in
here
was
no
miles
and
you
start
taking
a
little
Syrah
cause.
Then
you
start
noticing
everything
was
rotted,
so
you
don't
really
can't
go
in
there
and
see
what's
gonna
happen,
then
you
realize
that
it's
not
gonna
be
no
good.
Okay,.
K
K
K
F
L
B
I
have
met
with
the
building
department
because
the
two
structures
have
a
separation
distance
of
four
feet:
six
inches
according
to
mr.
Barajas,
and
the
building
department
requires
ten
feet.
So
we
we've
discussed
this
that
that
is
something
that
the
board
cannot
ground.
You
cannot
grant
variances
on
building
codes,
so
he
would
have
to
modify
the
plan
and
with
Building
Department
to
make
that
section
comply,
but
we
have
included
the.
L
B
J
J
E
B
L
G
L
L
A
See
you
know
my
my
take
on
this
is
that
mr.
Barack
has
been
in
the
business
should
know
that
a
demolition
permit
is
necessary
to
start
with,
and
you
also,
if
you
went
in,
to
do
remodeling,
which
I'm
still
fuzzy
about
what
were
you
going
to
remodel
that
if
you're
saying
you
were
going
to
remodel
everything,
okay,
fine,
but
the
minute,
you
start
to
remodel,
look
at
it
and
see
that
if
you're
gonna
have
to
tear
it
all
down.
Well,
that
requires
another
permit.
Well,
and
now
it's
a
new.
It's
a
new
structure.
J
A
J
A
E
E
B
Want
to
bring
another
point
that
the
building
department
recommended
it's
not
required,
but
they
also
recommend
for
fire
safety
that
the
rear
of
the
property
to
have
five
feet.
It's
not
a
requirement
because
the
zoning
that
they're
in
has
no
setback
in
the
rear,
but
for
fire.
Five
fire
protection,
they're
recommending
for
the
setback
to
be
five
feet,
so
I
included
that
on.
B
B
E
Well,
I
mean
like
I,
say:
I
mean
I,
don't
know
how
he's
going
to
mitigate
the
ten
feet
issue
there
unless
he's
gonna
put
one
single
roof,
I
mean
like
we
have
to
vote
on.
What's
in
front
of
us,
you
know
I'm
saying
I
mean
if
he
won
that
and
that's
so
that
we
have
no
authority
over.
That
requirement
is
in
place
right.
B
L
J
L
E
I
see
the
footprint
in,
like
I,
say
I'm
I'm
inclined
to
allow
for
the
footprint
I,
just
I,
I
kind
of
like
concur
with
staff.
It
I
mean
you
can't
have
the
two
buildings
that
list
there.
He
has
to
work
that
out
with
a
building
department,
not
with
us
I'm.
Okay
with
it
footprint
me
yeah,
that's.
That
would
be
my
opinion.
G
B
B
A
A
Next,
one
request
submitted
by
con
Builders
to
authorize
an
exception
to
the
literal
interpretation
of
the
regular
land
development
code,
section
24,
77
entitled
dimensional
standards
by
granting
a
variance
to
the
LOC
area,
requirements
on
the
north
one-half
of
block
8
block
980
Western
Division,
located
at
3800
for
West
San
Francisco
Avenue.
Does
anybody
here
to
speak
on
the
app
all
right,
sir?
Any
I
need
a
motion
on
moot
open
the
public,
a
motion
to
open
the
public
hearing
in
a
second
all
those
in
favor
aye
any
opposed
state,
your
name,
sir,
all
right,
sir.
M
M
F
B
M
A
By
reducing
a
lot
area
requirements
from
55,
20
or
22
87,
what
are
we
doing
there?
I'm,
sorry
I
think
that's
what
I'm
understanding
is
that
the
lot
requirement
areas
for
for
that,
though
north
1/2,
they
required
five
thousand
five
hundred
and
twenty
square
feet
and
you're
reducing
that.
Is
that
what
I'm
understanding.
B
D
B
B
M
E
E
B
E
M
B
A
E
A
K
D
F
You're
taking
old
Lots
that
didn't
that
probably
were
okay
when
they
were
built
in
70,
60
or
50
mm-hmm,
but
the
laws
have
changed.
The
rules
have
changed
right,
so
you
know
I
mean
I,
mean
kind
of
inclined
to
let
them
have
it.
But
the
fact
that
matters
you,
you
can't
just
paint
everything
with
a
brush
and
say:
okay,
because
we're
building
a
lot
or
a
house
on
the
same
footprint
as
was
built,
and
you
know
1950.