►
From YouTube: Building and Standards Meeting 111220
Description
Building and Standards Meeting 111220
A
Okay,
all
right:
let's
go
ahead
and
call
this
meeting
an
order.
It
is.
It
is
thursday
november
the
12th
2020
603
pm.
A
And
I
guess
we
can
go
ahead
and
this
let's
also
move
on
to
the
pledge
of
allegiance
to
the
next
item.
I
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
united.
B
A
Okay,
all
right,
let's
go
ahead
and
do
the
roll
call.
C
A
C
A
Do
we
have
anybody?
Do
you
have
any
anybody
wishing
to
speak
citizens
interested,
providing
comments,
or
particular
issue
or
or
to
call.
A
No
more
than
persons
who
won't
be
allowed
to
speak
on
any
side
of
an
issue
should
there
be
more
than
three
people
who
wish
to
speak
on
a
particular
issue.
They
need
to
select
not
more
than
three
representatives
to
speak
for
them
and
the
brazilian
officer
may
limit
the
public
comments
further
in
the
interest
of
an
orderly
meeting.
A
Speakers
may
not
pass
your
minutes
to
any
other
speaker.
Comments
should
be
relevant
to
city
business
and
delivered
in
a
professional
manner.
No
derogatory
comments
will
be
permitted.
Do
we
have
any
do
we
have
any
any
sensing
comments
today?
C
Mr
chairman,
we
have
a
set
up
here
in
case
somebody
shows
up
that
we
can
live
broadcast
them
also
onto,
and
I
have
staff
at
the
front
door
waiting
for
anybody
that
might
show
up.
So
there's
no.
E
A
Okay:
let's
move
on
to
the
next
item:
consideration
of
consideration
of
approval
of
minutes
from
the
regular
meeting
of
december
3rd
2020.
G
B
F
G
Yes,
just
on
the
addressing
of
myself
on
some
of
the
motions.
A
Be
okay,
can
we
go
ahead
and
okay
guys?
Can
we
go
ahead
and
correct
that
and
yeah
we
can
and
we
can
review
that
the
next
meeting.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
I
so
are
we
already
here
a
second
to
to
prove
the
minutes,
all
in
favor,
bye,
hi,
hi,
hi,.
G
A
Sign
motion
carries
okay.
Let's
now,
on
to
staff
report,
sf
update
on
the
demolition,
the
structures
ordered
by
the
board.
E
There
you
go,
are
those
there's
those
those
pictures
are
not
the
updates
right.
Those
are
the.
What
pictures
are
those
ones.
D
Updates
on
number
six
item
number
six
gonna
be
five
structures
that
are
already
for
demolitions
already
been
approved
and
today
we're
just
missing
the
notice
to
proceed
to
be
signed,
artica
one
of
the
contracts
for
anything
that
mr
kovach
and
we
schedule
a
meeting
for
mr
gonzalez
he'll,
be
in
tomorrow
to
signing
the
the
notice
to
proceed
and
to
take
up
the
demonstration
permit.
So
we
could
start
scheduling,
we're
trying
to
schedule
the
demolition
to
begin
november.
D
16Th
it's
gonna
be
on
monday
for
both
contractors,
one
contract
is
going
to
be
towards
left
statement
and
the
other
construct
is
the
triple
pg
enterprise
incorporated.
D
This
month,
1120
alamo
street
1702
main
avenue
447
sao
paulo
avenue,
306
gaza
street
rear.
D
E
D
F
C
C
So,
but
you
can
see
the
only
one
that
we
had
an
issue
with
with
3919
east
montgomery.
The
property
owner
did
not
let
us
in,
and
we
checked
with
legal
on
that
one
and
unfortunately,
we
weren't
able
to
get
a
warrant
to
to
to
go
into
the
the
premise
the
the
legal
mention
to
us
to
bring
it
back
to
the
board.
So
you're
gonna
see
this
one
coming
back
to
the
board
to
update
the
demo
order.
C
So
then
that
way
we
can
proceed
again
to
to
try
to
bid
it
out,
but
the
rest
of
them
you
can
see
before
and
after
pictures
of
those,
and
then
these
are
the
current
five
that
are
out
for
demo
right
now.
So
the
notice
to
proceed
was
issued
today,
and
so
they
have
10
days
to
kind
of
get
ready
and
cold
permits
and
everything
else.
So
by
your
next
meeting.
C
Your
your
hard
work
and
coming
over
here
and
and
dealing
with
these
structures
and
these
issues
are,
are
coming
through
some
fruition
fruition
and
eliminating
all
these
hazards,
so
just
wanted
to
give
a
good
update
to
the
board
on
what's
going
on.
So
if
the
board
doesn't
have
any
questions
on
any
of
the
pictures,
that's
my
report
for
right
now.
A
Okay,
all
right,
let's
move
on,
I
guess
we
move
on
to
to
the
next
item,
which
is
public
demolition.
I'm
sorry
public
hearing
discussion
possible
impossible
action
regarding
the
demolition
of
structures
identified,
the
substandard
dangerous
buildings.
A
Is
consideration
of
possible
action
on
the
property
of
maria
mario
alberto
neda
junior,
whose
legal
description
is
south?
Two
thirds
of
lot
one
block
nine.
Ninety
five
western
division
is
commonly
known
as
3902's
without
a
street
reality
avenue.
I'm
sorry
declares
staffordshire's
property
as
a
nuisance.
In
accordance
with
the
current
adopted
ordinance
2013,
oh
dash,
25
article
1,
section
24-1.4,
chapter
6,.
A
238
3
23b
h
I
2
3
2
r
and
2
3
2.
U
staff
recommend
a
demolition
of
the
structure.
Board
gave
time
to
notified
owner
was
notified.
No
response
was
ever
made.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
we
don't
have
any.
Nobody
is
present
to
make
public
comments.
B
Yeah
I'll
make
a
motion
to
for
staff
recommendation
to
be
a
demolish.
I
think.
H
A
D
Nobody
responded,
nobody,
I
read
it
there
at
the
agenda,
nobody
made
any
thoughts
or
any
context.
I
left
a
message
at
the
property
owner's
house
and
nobody
answered.
Nobody
came
back
to
us.
Nobody
called
back,
nobody
ever
said
anything
and
the
house
is
the
same.
D
They
never
claimed
they
never,
and
one
of
the
owners
from
across
the
street
came
out
when
I
went
to
take
the
pictures
on
on
october
19th
and
he
was
telling
me
that
they're
using
it
at
the
living
quarters,
all
the
homeless
are
leaving
there
and
they
call
police
and
they
go
and-
and
you
know,
take
him
out,
but
next
because.
F
E
And
I
have
nobody
here
in
the
office
that
wants.
D
Yes,
actually,
the
owner
is,
you
know,
worried
about
there's
starting
another
another
fire,
because
it
was
it
was,
as
you
can
see
in
the
report.
There's
a
there
have
been
a
fire
there
before.
H
A
Carries
okay
and
I
heard
a
motion
to
to
to
go
ahead
and
to
follow
staff
recommendation.
H
A
Same
sign,
motion
carries
item
b,
is
consideration:
a
possible
action
on
the
property
of
double
a
holdings,
land
trust
character,
trustee
whose
legal
description
is
lots.
Four,
five
and
six
at
blood
block
973
western
division,
it's
commonly
known
as
1303
philadelphia
street
staff
declares
this
property
as
a
nuisance.
A
In
accordance
with
the
current
adopted
ordinance,
2013
0-1
0-25
article
1,
section
24-1.4,
chapter
16,
section,
16.55,
two,
one,
two,
two,
two,
three,
eight
two,
three
b,
two
three
two
h,
I
two
three
two
r
and
two
three:
two:
u
staff
recommends
demolition
of
the
structure
entire
structure.
Only
the
house
board
gave
time
to
notify
the
owner
house
was
boarded,
but
owner
did
not
respond.
H
D
Well,
they
they
voted
and
actually
the
the
one
in
charge
he's
not
the
owner
he's
the
one
in
charge
he's
like
the
super
from
the
apartment
next
door,
and
he
was
advising
me
that
he
was.
He
was
concerned
about
the
homeless
and
the
prostitution
going
on
there.
So
he
boarded
and
he
put
on
some
blocks
on
the
door,
but
they
haven't
fixed
the
plumbing
issue.
They
have
there
in
the
side
he
told
me
that
he
was
gonna.
Try
and
get
some
dirt.
D
Just
to
you
know
cover
up
everything
there,
but
he
wasn't
responsible.
For
that.
I
mean
he's
he's
just
the
super
of
the
prospect.
That's
the
owner,
the
owner,
having
you
know,
hasn't
made
any
contact
with
us,
send
them
letters.
We
had
a
phone
number
and
nobody
answered.
D
I
guess
I
don't
know
if
they're
they're
there
during
the
day
or
that
they're
not
there
during
the
day.
D
Actually
I
got
I
I
talked
to
the
super
there
and
I
told
them
you
know
to
make
contact
with
the
owner,
but
he
said
that
it's
not
answering
you
know,
I'm
I'm
guessing
that
because
of
the
convict
or
I
don't
know,
I
have
no
idea
what's
going
on
over
there
from
here,
they're
from
palo
alto,
california
and
we
haven't
had
any,
but
the
trooper
already
made
the
effort
and
covered
up
the
the
back
entrance
and
put
it
off
on
the
the
doors
that
were
added
access
to
the
homeless
and
he
already
put
another
knot
over
there
in
the
back
in
the
rear.
E
D
There
was
a
second
time
they
went
in,
but
the
the
door
was
reinforced.
Then
the
leather
lock
was
played,
and
you
know
the
super
is
real
good
on
communicating
with
me
and
also
with
the
enforcement
officer.
You
know
we
called
him
up
and
you
know:
there's
the
door
open.
Okay,
one
victory
right
now,
and
he
did
you
know
he
fixed
it
and
he
faced
another
lock
and
reinforced
the
the
the
with
a
new
log,
a
bigger
loss
and
you
reinforce
the
iron
door.
H
I
mean
it
looks
pretty
secure,
is
the
owner
up
to
date
on
his
taxes.
D
That
I
haven't
checked
on
that.
The
only
thing
my
concern
was
the
the
issue
with
the
plumbing
there.
It's
right
right
right
right
next
to
it
right
away.
D
You
can
see,
there's
a
hole
there
and
we
see
a
new
thing.
You
can
see.
I
mean
it's
playing
around
there,
so
I'm
not
sure
the
quality
or
where
they
came.
The
new
sense,
it's
okay,
because
you
can
see
the
whole.
You
can
actually
hear
the
whole
air
that
they
have
there
on
the
side.
But
when
the
music
comes,
you
know
comes
an
issue,
you
can
see,
there's
a
hole
there.
E
H
H
A
Okay,
okay,
all
in
favor,
all
right
all
right
same
sign.
Motion
carry
do!
Do
you
know,
in
light
of
all
this
information,
do
you
all
still
recommend
demolition
of
this
structure?
A
D
I
mean
I
would
recommend
the
demonstration
because
the
the
owner
has
been
making
contact
with
us.
The
only
one
that's
taking
responsibility
is
the
super,
but
he's
not
the
owner.
So
I'll
leave
it
up
to
you.
If
you
want
to
you
know
actually
just.
C
I
guess
the
question
is
you're.
Ever
the
one
that's
been
out
there.
Most
is
the
the
structure
of
any
sort
of
hazard
or
nuisance,
where
you
mentioned
that
the
prostitution
is
going
on
or
homeless
are
getting
in
there.
Even
though
it's
boarded
up
that's
what
the
board
is
asking.
D
Yeah
actually
yeah,
we
we,
I
had
a
schedule,
mr
bautista,
from
laredo
pd.
If
he
can
show
up,
but
I
think
he's
he
told
me,
he
couldn't
make
it
because
he's
working
nycha
he's
the
one.
Actually
that
makes
another
complaint.
It
was
an
original
complaint,
but
he
made
another
complaint
because
of
the
prostitution
and
the
drugs
going
on
in
there,
and
he
actually
made
contact
with
the
super
of
the
property,
and
that
was
why
he
did
the
boarding
and
the
laws
and
everything.
D
F
D
Back,
I'm
probably
sure
that
they're
gonna
be
there
again
all
the
prostitution
and
the
homeless
and
all
that
because
of
the
the
lighting
that
they
still
have
light
there.
They
still
have
service
for
the
light.
H
Yes,
that's
my
point
it's
like
if
it
still
has
two
meters
that
are
and
the
building's
boarded
up-
and
I
guess
like
I
was-
I
guess
what
I
was
trying
to
get
to
is,
if
I
know
the
owner's
not
here,
but
if
he,
if
he's
paying
his
taxes
well,
then
that's
money
that
comes
into
the
city,
then
I
think
we
should
just
keep
it,
but
if
it
really
is
a
nuisance
and
the
owner's
not
doing
anything
about
it.
Well
then,
at
that
point
we
as
a
board
need
to
say
okay.
H
Well,
I
think
our
first,
our
first,
our
first
duty
is
to
deal
with
these
nuisances
right
so,
but
our
second
duty
is
to
to
you
know
if
the
building
is
still
in
good
shape
and
it's
being
boarded
up,
I
don't
think
we
want
to
be
demoing
everything,
but
I
mean
that's
just
my
opinion.
I
don't
know
what
the
rest
of
the
board
thinks.
B
D
D
That
was
reinforced
november
october
16th.
G
Is
the
super
that
oversees
the
property
next
door
is
that
property
also
owned
by
the
same
owner.
D
E
H
Can
we
can
we
can
we
table
this
one
till
and
maybe
rigo?
If
you
can
get
us
a
list
of
all
the
reports
from
pd
yeah,
let's
see
what's
going
on
in
that
and
then
we
can,
if,
if
we
can
see
yeah,
you
know
what
there's
been
fires
or
pd's
been
out
there
five
times
this
month?
Well,
then,
we
know
it's
an
issue
at
that
point.
I
think
we
feel
a
little
bit
more
comfortable
in
saying
yeah.
Let's
go
ahead
and
demo
it
maybe.
H
D
A
Be
the
best
yeah
and
also
maybe
have
not,
maybe
you
have
any
sort
of
like
you
know,
documentation.
Regarding
your
conversations
with
the
with
the
super,
you
know
you
know,
that'll
also
help,
because
I
think
I
think
we
need
to
table
this,
at
least
for
the
at
least
until
the
next
meeting.
All.
A
All
in
favor,
aye,
aye,
okay,
same
sign
motion
carries
okay,
all
right.
Moving
on
to
I
item
c
consideration:
a
possible
action
on
the
property
of
silvia
o
hauser,
whose
legal
description
is
lots
one
and
two
of
block
151
western
division.
It
is
commonly
known
as
1520
lincoln
street
this
afternoon
is
property
nuisance
in
accordance
with
the
current
adopted
ordinance,
2013
0-25
article
1,
section
24-1.4,
chapter
16,
section,
16.55,
21,
22,
238,
23b,
232,
hi,
232r
and
232u
staff
recommends
demolition.
A
The
two
mobile
homes
located
in
the
in
the
front
property
and
definition
of
the
entire
rear
structure
board
gave
30
days
to
fixing
fixed
cleaning
repair
september
14
2020
and
none
was
done
by
owner
in
30
days.
D
There's
two
mobile
homes
and
a
refresher
in
the
back
last
time.
He
gave
him
30
days
to
gain
and
to
board,
but
the
only
thing
he
did
was
cut
the
grass.
Everything
is
the
same,
the
same
issue.
We
have
a
box
spring
in
the
back.
We
have,
he
didn't
move
anything.
He
didn't
do
anything
actually.
Now
I
I
called
him.
I
went
by
his
house,
but
it's
not
big
funny.
F
D
Actually,
after
the
meeting
I
went
by
and
inspected
rear
structure,
he
opened
up
everything
and
we
took
pictures
and
everything,
but
he
told
me
that
he
was
gonna
fix
this
or
start
to
fix.
You
know,
but
you
only
cut
the
grass
in
30
days.
He
only
cuts
the
grass,
he
didn't
move
anything
getting
secure,
the
the
gate
and
the
houses
are
still.
You
know,
they're
still
open.
F
B
D
Regal,
no,
no,
no,
not
even
the
the
rear
structure
you
can
see
there.
We
don't
have
that
specific
access
to
the
rear
structure.
We
have
to
go
to
a
private
parking
lot,
but,
as
you
can
see
there,
the
roof
is
already
flying.
H
I
will
make
a
motion
to
if
the,
if,
if
this
person
hasn't
done
anything,
I
think
the
only
way
to
force
them
to
do
something
is
to
just
move
forward
with
this.
So
I
would
make
a
motion
to
demolish
all
three
structures.
Is
that
what
we're
saying.
F
H
C
From
from
past
experience,
rick
when
it's
a
mobile
home,
that's
dilapidated,
like
this,
the
ownership
is
probably
going
to
be
in
question.
So
what
we've
noticed
from
other
incidences,
where,
let's
say
a
mobile
home
like
this,
gets
transferred
to
somebody
or
somebody
acquires
it
for
cash,
but
it's
not
recorded
at
the
state.
C
A
Okay,
all
right-
or
I
guess,
moving
on
any
other
comments
on
this
on
this
item.
A
B
A
All
right:
let's
move
on
to
item
d,
consideration
a
possible
action
on
the
property
of
rita
ramirez,
whose
legal
description
is
lot.
Eight
block,
1964
eastern
divisions
commonly
known
as
travis
in
the
hill,
located
at
the
southwest
corner
of
travis
in
the
evil
staff,
declares
this
property
nuisance
in
accordance
with
the
current
adopted
ordinance,
2013
0-25
article
1,
section,
224-1.4,
chapter
16
sections.
A
E
B
G
D
F
A
All
in
favor,
hi,
hi,
hi,
hi,
okay,
same
sign
motion
carries
okay,
moving
on
to
a
consideration
possible
action
on
the
property
of
fernando
di
gutierrez,
whose
legal
description
is
lot;
5
block,
74
western
division
commonly
known
as
302
san
nico
avenue.
A
A
Oh
that's
25,
article
1,
section
24-1.4,
chapter
16,
16.55,
2,
1,
2,
2,
2,
three,
eight,
two,
three
b,
two
three
two
h,
I
two
three
two
r
and
two
three:
two:
u
staff
recommends
the
demolition
of
the
the
two
entire
structures
or
gave
time
for
owner
to
contact,
respond
and
notice
the
demolition,
no
contact
or
or
response
from
the
owner,
nor
any
action
to
rectify
the
nuisance
of
these
structures.
B
F
Still
here
checking
the
front
office
and
I
haven't
received
any
customers.
G
D
You
didn't
make
any
contact
with
us.
I
spoke
to
a
court
enforcement,
mr
juan.
He
told
me
the
same
thing
that
he's
actually,
I
think
next
month
it's
already
gonna
be
entered
into
a
forced
king.
D
D
The
law
office
remains
closed.
Nobody
is
also
he's
getting
a
complaint
from
the
office
also
that
the
museum
is
already
sitting
on
a
fan.
D
B
D
E
H
This
neighborhood
is,
is
got
a
lot
of
history
to
it,
and
these
houses
are
are
part
of
that
fabric
and
we
really
didn't
want
to
demo
them.
We
really
wanted
to
see
if
we
could
get
the
owner
to
come
forward.
You
know,
I
think
I
think
this
is
an
example
of
where
they
it's
it's.
It's
demoed
by
neglect.
H
You
know
these
things
are
just
going
to
fall
apart
at
some
point,
which
is
a
shame
because
they're
they're
beautiful
little
houses-
I
know
they're
boarded
up,
but
if
you're
saying
so
is
the
issue
the
nuisance
because
of
the
grass
that's
around
it
and
then
the
rodents
or
is
it
because
people
are
getting
in.
D
H
Yeah,
so
I
mean
if
they're
gonna
do
a
force
clean,
I
mean
I
would
I
would.
I
would
do
that
first
and
see,
and
that
way,
maybe
we
can
go,
take
a
better
look
at
it
and
and
and
kind
of
determine
whether
these
buildings
can
be
preserved.
I
don't
know
if
you'll
first
clean
at
that
point.
Is
there
a
lien
on
the
property.
H
B
D
No,
I
haven't,
I
haven't
been
inside
totally
seasoned
the
outside
from
the
from
the
gate,
it's
locked
and
everything,
but
you
can
see
that
the
roof
is
falling
off.
Actually
one
one
of
the.
When
I
took
this
pictures
on
on
october
19,
we
saw
me
and
the
new
court
enforcement.
B
Is
all
the
windows
board
up
the
in
the
door,
because
I
kind
of
agree
with
it's
just
about
saying:
preserving
those
little
houses?
But
if
it's
you
know
if
it's
in
real
bad
shape
that
it
really
is
going
to
come
down,
because
you
know
it's
a
different
story.
G
We
make
plans
to
look
at
the
houses
once
the
the
cleaning
is
done
in
the
yard
to
be
able
to
maybe
access
it
and
make
contact
with
the
owner
or
somebody
representing
the
owner.
So
we
can.
D
Actually,
no
everything
is
locked.
Nobody,
even
inside
the
only
the
only
one
that
can
get
inside
is
actually
the
the
one
during
the
fourth
minute,
but
it's
not
gonna
be
done
until
next
month.
H
C
The
if
I
may
interject
mr
salisa,
I
just
wanted
just
to
do
a
suggestion
with
the
board,
because
I
think
there's
some
hesitation
by
everybody,
which
you
know
we
understand.
We
want
to
preserve
our
history.
I
I
let
me
check
with
legal
on
this.
C
So
if
you
guys
want
to
push
this
back
a
little
bit
more
see
if
we
can
maybe
as
a
as
you
as
the
board,
I
believe
you
do,
but
let
me
just
verify
with
legal
that
maybe
you
might
have
the
the
the
power
to
order
a
repair
such
as
repairing
the
roof
and
painting
the
structure
or
something
to
that
extent.
C
So
let
me
see
what
the
extent
of
the
orders
that
you
can
that
you
can
give
out
to
to
facilitate
a
little
bit
better,
because
I
do
have
that
concern.
You
know
we
have
a
lot
of
dilapidated
structures
or
abandoned
buildings
that
get
you
know.
You
know
arson
on
them
or
or
you
know
they
become
a
fire
hazard
if
they're
left
alone,
like
that.
C
C
Okay,
so
if
you
would
like
to
table
it
I'll
go
ahead
and
do
that
and
we'll
bring
it
back
one
minute.
B
Maybe
the
guy
once
said:
first
getting
the
property,
maybe
he'll
come
and
he'll
come
around,
and
maybe
he
won't
want
to
fix
it
up
or
maybe
preserve
it
or
something.
Well
once
he
gets,
you
know,
14
he's
going
to
get
a
you
know,
he's
got
a
bill
for
that.
So.
C
Unfortunately,
I
mean
I've
been
at
this
for
many
many
years
for
the
board
members
and
only
in
the
history
that
the
typical
thing
that
and-
and
I
can't
say
it's
going
to
be
for
this
case,
but
roland
used
to
work
in
code
enforcement,
so
yeah.
C
The
if
they
haven't
done
anything
with
them
today,
they're
not
going
to
do
anything.
C
C
So
if
you,
the
board,
allows
me
I'll
I'll
go
ahead
and
see
if
we
can,
what
kind
of
you
know
what
can
we
do
as
a
board
as
what
you
can
order
to
maybe
improve
the
structure
a
little
bit
so
that
way,
the
neighbors
don't
have
to
be
dealing
with
these
a
lot
of
infrastructures.
H
I
thought
I
guess
just
in
terms
of-
and
I
know
we've
talked
about
this
but
and
I
know
it's
something
we
want
to
work
on,
but
this
issue
of
a
of
you
know
an
existing
building
ordinance
or
you
know
demolition
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it.
You
know
how
would
we
go
about
talking
about
that
like
they
do
in
san
antonio,
like
who
we?
What
would
need
to
be
the
process
to
start?
H
Looking
at
that,
because
some
of
these
buildings
we
really
would
want
to
preserve,
and
if
we
can,
if
we
had
some
some
muscle
to
be
able
to
do
that,
I
think
I
think
this
board
would
would
jump
at
that
chance.
But
right
now
I
feel
like
we
have
two
options:
we
either
we
either
wait
or
we
demo
it
and
for
like
some
of
these
instances,
it'd
be
nice
to
have
some
options.
C
And
then
that's
why
I
kind
of
want
to
look
at
it
with
the
the
ordinance
itself.
If
you
read
it,
it
gives
you
all
a
a
a
lot
of
authority
in
dealing
with
these
structures.
I
I
just
want
to
get
a
little
bit
more
clarity,
so
I
can
be
able
to
provide
you
that
that
input
to
what
other
options
you
might
have
available
to
yourself
for
these,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
give
you
good
advice
in
terms
of
what
we
can
or
can
do.
Okay.
B
Maybe
the
taxes
on
this
on
this
property
that
they're
up
to
date,
because
you
know
sometimes
they
can
go
on
for
you
know
for
years
and
years
and
nobody
goes
into
the
tax
office
or
you
know
claims
that
that
you
know
taxes
are
being
paid
and
maybe
you
can
go
into
an
auction.
I
mean
that
that's
important
too.
C
A
All
in
favor,
aye,
aye,
aye,
aye
same
sign,
promotion
carries
we'll
go
ahead
and
table
that
into
go
for
the
next
meeting.
Last
item
item
f:
consideration
of
possible
action
on
the
property
of
francisco
j
larma,
whose
legal
description
is
is
pts
of
of
parts
of
lots,
2,
4,
2,
4,
6
and
8.
block
279
western
division
track.
Number
two
is
commonly
known
as
as
vidaudi
avenue.
1920
scott
street
doctor
closes
property
as
a
nuisance.
A
223B
232,
hi232r
and
2232u
staff
recommends,
in
demolition
of
the
entire
structure
board,
gave
45
days
to
hector
chapa
to
purchase
structure
from
current
owner.
You
know:
did
that
not
happen
that
purchase?
C
I
I
know
that
that
they
were
in
the
process.
I
think
the
trustee,
mr
lopez,
they
were
in
communication
and
they
were
in
the
process
of
trying
to
establish
a
purchase
date.
So
I
so
I
think
it
is
moving
forward
from
the
last
traffic
email
traffic.
I
saw.
I
just
don't
know
when
they're
gonna
they're
gonna
purchase
it
so,
but
we
can
check
back
and
we
can.
We
can
very
easily
bring
it
back
to
the
next
board
meeting
and
it's
been
there
for
quite
a
while.
C
Well,
if
somebody
buys
it,
if
buys,
I
mean,
hopefully
the
I
mean
they
plan
to
do
something
with
it.
Hopefully
soon.
C
You
could
give
us
a
motion
to
demo
if
we
find
out
that
there's
been
no
purchase
sale
in
the
next
five
days
or
ten
days.
You
know
so
we
we
could
still
do
that.
So
what
whatever
directive
that
the
board
would
like
to
still
give
us,
I
mean
we'll
we'll
abide
by
so.
B
Yeah,
it's
been
a
long
time,
so
my
my
recommendation
stats
recommendation
for
demolish.
You
know
I
I
I
I
would
agree
for
staff
for
us
to
go
in
and
demolish
this
building.
It's
been
like
after
a
long
time.
Okay.
C
The
the
issue
and
well,
I
doubt
that
the
building
has
any
value
to
it,
but
to
where
it'll
get
a
little
tricky
for
us
is
if
we
find
out
that
the
sale
is
going
on,
so
I
might
do
an
administrative
pause
on
it.
C
If
we
do
proceed
with
the,
if
you
do
proceed
with
ordering
a
demo,
because
then
we'd
probably
have
to
come
back
with
the
new
owner
and
start
the
whole
process
all
over
again,
so
you
can
issue
the
demo
order
right
now
and
if
there's
no
transaction
that
happens
for
the
purchase
of
it,
then
we
move
forward.
C
If
there
is
a
transaction,
then
we
deal
with
a
new
owner
and
we
bring
it
back
to
you
again
as
a
new
to
establish
due
process
for
the
new
owner,
since
this
kind
of
happened
in
the
middle
of
the
other
purchase.
So
we
can
do
that
to
make
it
a
little
bit
easier
to
make
the
decision.
H
A
H
B
D
B
C
From
what
we
know,
I'm
sure
if
we
we
haven't,
it
hasn't
sold
yet.
So
it's
still
under
the
same
answer.
A
Okay,
same
sign,
emotion,
carries
and
then
but
you,
but
we're
going
to
be
doing
an
administrative
pause
on
this.
I
guess
for
right
now.
C
Yeah,
because
if
it
doesn't
go
through,
then
I
can't
put
a
lien
on
the
property
if
it's
under
a
separate
owner
because
they
weren't
they
wouldn't
have
been
given
legal
due
process.
So
I'd
have
to
back
off
a
little
bit
and
bring
it
back
to
you
and
start
the
whole
process
over.
H
A
Okay,
but
we'll
still,
I
guess,
we'll
to
revis.
I
guess
we
can
also
revisit
this
in
the
bottom
next
month
to
get
us
to
an
update
on
this.
C
Yes,
as
soon
as
this
board
meeting
is
over
miss
jackson
tomorrow,
we'll
probably
work
on
the
demolition
order,
so
for
you
to
sign
and
we'll
be
beating
out
as
soon
as
next
week.
So
all
these
orders
we've
gotten
good
enough
funding.
So
we
have
so.
We
start
sufficient
funding
to
proceed
with
the
demos
you
issue
and
I
have
asked
our
city
manager
for
additional
funds,
as
we
are
almost
going
to
deplete
our
balance,
but
I'm
hoping
that
we
that
we
get
funded
again.