►
From YouTube: Charter Revision Commission Meeting 011520
Description
Charter Revision Commission Meeting 011520
A
B
A
C
C
A
We
come
now
to
Roman
numeral
two
general
citizen
communication
speaker,
signed
up
prior
to
a
meeting
being
called
to
order,
will
be
each
allowed
a
three
minute
allotment
to
address
their
concerns
regarding
items
whether
or
not
they're
posted
on
the
agenda.
Derogatory
remarks
will
not
be
permeated
permitted.
Thank
you.
Do
we
have
speakers
tonight.
E
E
It's
been
refreshing
to
hear
and
read
the
good
things
coming
from
the
news
media
about
what
y'all
have
been
doing
for
the
betterment
of
our
community.
So
I
appreciate
hearing
that
reading
about
the
O
in
the
press
and
hearing
it
on
the
TV
news.
However,
I
have
not
read
or
heard
anything
about
taxpayers
coming
before
you
with
any
suggested
changes,
so
Mary,
Hereford
and
I
decided.
We
would
go
out
to
the
public
and
ask
them
what
would
you
like
to
see
changed
in
our
city
charter?
E
We
compiled
the
26
suggested
changes
which
we're
presenting
and
delivering
to
you
this
evening
and
requesting
that
this
Commission
discuss
discuss
each
item
with
possible
action
at
your
next
meeting.
I
will
now
start
with
the
first
half
of
them
and
then
Mellie
will
come
forward
with
her
comments
and
complete
the
other
half
of
them
and
if
some
of
them
duplicates
and
maybe
what
y'all
have
already
covered,
what
I
hope
they
do.
If
it
is
it's
a
sign
that
the
public
concern
matches
and
confirms
your
concern
all
right.
E
I'll
start
with
number
one:
I
create
an
ordinance
to
convert
the
Charter
revision
Commission
to
a
quasi-judicial,
independent
commission.
All
approve
proposed
changes
to
the
Charter
would
go
straight
to
the
ballot,
bypassing
City
Council.
You
would
have
your
own
independent
attorney.
You
would
have
your
own
staff.
You
would
have
your
own
operating
budget
number
to
change
the
ethics
ordinance
to
convert
the
Ethics
Commission
to
a
quasi
judicial
board,
independent
commission
identical
to
what
I
just
said
about
this
one
right
here.
So
whatever
the
Ethics
Commission
would
do,
it
would
go
straight
to
the
voters.
E
They
would
make
the
change
number
three
create
at
least
two
at-large
positions
on
the
City
Council.
Now
is
the
right
time
more
so
because
we're
going
into
the
census,
20
census
number
four
create
a
section
to
either
eliminate
or
limit
the
amount
of
discretionary
funds
given
to
each
council.
Member.
Today,
it's
about
five
hundred
thousand
dollars,
if
not
eliminated,
then
mandate,
preparation
of
written
guidelines
on
the
purpose
and
limited
use
of
these
funds
number
five
create
a
section
to
either
eliminate
or
limit
the
amount
of
printing
allowance
given
to
each
council.
E
Member
I
think
that's
around
twenty
thousand
dollars,
if
not
eliminated,
then
mandate
preparation
of
written
guidelines
for
the
use
of
those
funds
number
six.
The
same
thing
create
a
section
to
either
eliminate
or
limit
the
promotional
allowance
that
each
council
member
gets
and
that's
about
ten
thousand
dollars.
E
Number
seven
change
recall
of
elected
officials
to
ten
percent
of
the
voters
in
the
previous
election
number
eight
create
a
mandate
to
stop
and
convert
the
sports
venue,
sales
tax
and
economic
development
sales
tax
number
nine
create
a
section
to
stipulate
consequences,
penalties
for
violating
city
charter
by
employees
and
elected
officials.
Number
ten
create
a
section
that
stipulates
consequences:
penalties
for
violating
city
code
of
ethics
by
employees
and
elected
officials,
number
eleven,
create
a
pledge
for
every
elected
official
and
every
new
employee
beat
and
sang.
This
is
not
oath
of
office.
E
This
is
a
pledge,
number
twelve
change,
the
means
of
determining
the
salary
and
providing
salary
increases
to
each
council.
Member
from
the
ordinance
method
to
the
voter
referendum
method
in
this
same
proposed
section
include
language
that
the
City
Council
cannot
give
themselves
any
money
for
anything
without
a
voter
referendum.
Number
thirteen
create
a
section
to
reduce
and
limit
other
benefit.
E
Bounces
such
as
phone
currently
150
dollars
a
month
and
vehicles
that's
about
$750
a
month
that
are
given
to
each
councilmember
the
ordinance
and
written
guidelines
city
to
issue
a
phone
to
each
council
member
at
a
lower
expense,
much
lower
than
150
dollars
and
lower
the
vehicle
allows
to
$300
per
month
for
each
County
I.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
present
the
first
half
of
them
at
this
time.
Miss
perfect,
thank
you
for
allowing
the
citizens
to
come
before
you
and
share
their
suggested.
Thank
you.
A
F
E
Many
different
means
at
church
meeting,
parishioners
coffee
shops,
I'm,
making
the
server
coffee
shops.
We
have
Facebook
where
people
message
us
and
people
have
sent
any
means
telephone
calls
any
means
that
people
have
communicated
with
us.
There
are
times
when
we
didn't
even
walk
up
to
you
and
say
what
would
you
like
changed?
They
approached
us
so
there's
many
things.
This
is
not.
This
is
not
a
formal
survey
where
we
went
out
and
paid
$25,000
we
conducted.
This
is
just
citizens
public
citizens
trying
to
get
information,
since
they
were
not
coming
before
you
I.
F
E
Diversity
I
went
to
may
have
first,
I
would
say
they
were
device,
diverse
group
of
people
all
the
way
from
I'm
thinking
now
of
the
people
that
I've
talked
to
a
single
mother
with
kids
people
on
limited
income,
people
living
paycheck
to
paycheck
and
I've
also
spoken
to
people
that
owned
businesses
that
are
concerned
about
their
business.
So
it's.
F
F
G
Commissioners
and
thank
you
so
much
for
serving
our
community
by
sharing
of
your
time
in
this
very
important
work
that
you
do
to
amend
this
important
document
for
the
rules
of
engagement
with
our
city
government.
As
you
know,
we
always
like
to
engage
the
public
in
an
effort
that
they
become
informed
about
the
issues
that
impact
all
of
us
and
with
this
in
mind
david
and
I
compile
these
suggestions
given
to
us
by
taxpayers
of
our
community,
and
this
is
where
I
will
begin
eliminate
the
line.
G
Doubt
words
in
this
section
section:
3.0,
five
powers
and
duties
of
a
city
manager,
number
nine
shall
perform
each
up
so
perform
such
other
duties
as
are
specified
in
this
charter,
and
you
line
out
or
may
be
required
by
the
city.
Council
number
fifteen
create
a
section
to
eliminate
the
current
seven
hundred
and
fifty
monthly
allowance
for
a
home
office.
Use
include
in
that
section
that
each
council
member
will
be
given
a
free
office
in
a
city
recreational
center
in
their
respective
districts.
Number.
G
Sixteen
create
a
section
that
defines
the
use
of
supplemental
agendas
as
defined
in
the
Texas
government
code.
The
Laredo
City
Council
should
immediately
stop
using
these
types
of
agendas
unless
they
clearly
identify
the
emergency
or
urgent
public
necessity
in
the
notice
or
supplemental
notice.
Under
this
section
in
the
Texas
Attorney
General's
Open
Meetings
handler
number
seventeen
replaced
2.06
investigation
with
the
following
language.
G
Refusal
to
attend
in
testifier
to
produce
books,
papers
and
other
evidence.
Material
to
the
inquiry
shall
result
in
the
forfeiture
of
any
office.
Employment
emolument
or
contract
then
accruing
to
the
person
so
refusing
the
counsel
may
provide
by
ordinance
additional
penalties
for
contempt
in
failing
or
refusing
to
obey
any
such
subpoena
to
produce
any
such
books
papers
or
other
evidence,
and
shall
have
the
power
to
punish
any
such
contempt
in
the
manner
provided
by
such
ordinance.
Member
18
make
this
section
enforceable
and
specify
penalties,
section
2.0
for
vacancies
forfeiture
of
office
filling
of
vacancies.
G
Number
three
is
convicted
of
a
crime
involving
moral
turpitude
or
felony
number
19
create
the
section
or
addi
section
with
specified
penalties
regarding
councilmembers
that
do
not
reside
in
the
district
they
were
elected
to
serve.
This
is
to
include
forfeiture
of
office
as
a
minimum
number
20,
eliminate
or
prepare
and
implement
written
procedures,
guidelines,
duties
and
responsibilities
for
the
assistants
assigned
to
council
members
procedures
that
will
clearly
state
that
assistance
cannot
be
used
for
personal
errands
or
personal
family
errands.
G
Also,
assistance
will
not
be
allowed
to
accompany
council
members
on
their
out
of
setting
out
of
state
or
out
of
the
nation
trips
unless
the
reasoning
and
justification
are
explained
to
the
public.
Prior
to
the
trip
number
21
create
a
Travel
section
that
council
members
will
be
limited
to
to
trips
1
to
Austin
and
went
to
Washington
DC
excuse
me
per
year.
22
change
the
Charter
so
that
the
city
attorney
and
the
city
secretary
will
be
elected
offices.
23
eliminate
the
newly
created
retirement
benefits
program.
G
Excuse
me
for
the
City
Council
have
not
eliminated
and
create
a
section
with
written
procedures
on
how
the
City
Council's
minimum
required.
1,000
work
hours
will
be
documented
for
public
record
24
change
campaign,
finance
reform,
that
if
a
council
member
votes
for
a
union
contract
or
developers
or
special
interests,
he
or
she
cannot
receive
any
monetary
or
in-kind
contributions.
If
they
violate
this
clause,
they
must
vacate
their
position
immediately
without
any
action
from
the
council
or
the
city
manager,
all
other
donations,
or
it
should
be
limited
to
250
dollars.
G
25
create
and
change
section
that
random
drug
tests
will
be
taken
once
every
two
years
for
every
city,
employee
and
all
city,
elected
officials
and
number
26
create
a
section
that
requires
that
to
serve
on
the
City
Council.
The
member
must
be
a
land
and
home
owner
in
the
city
of
Laredo,
with
their
property
listed
on
the
web
county
appraisal
districts
website
also,
this
section
would
require
the
same
from
anyone
that
serves
on
any
City
Commission
committee
and
hoc
committee
and
board
that
deals
with
property,
land
buildings,
zoning
fees,
etc.
A
F
G
E
A
E
Record
my
name
is
David
card.
Well,
thank
you.
Ml
ml
l,
moving
Laredo
forward.
I
was
a
chairman
of
that
organization.
Back
in
2016,
then
I
later
became
the
campus
Ranger
wait
repaired
five
proposals
that
were
on
the
ballot.
We
got
signal
over
ten
thousand
signatures.
We
only
needed
less
than
six
thousand
eight
thousand
and
some
odd
of
them
were
verified
as
good
signatures.
After
we
went.
E
I
The
for
the
record,
my
name
is
Pancho
Castle
fujimi,
chairman
members
of
the
Commission
I,
represent
myself
and
I
also
represent
a
group
that
I
have
on
social
media
on
Facebook
call
Civic,
which
is
an
acronym
for
a
citizen's
initiative
for
rhetoric.
Veritas
and
informed
communities
and
I
have
a
quite
a
big
following
I've.
Been
writing
commentaries
for
the
last
year.
I
I've
got
about
over
150
commentaries,
and
you
can-
and
you
know,
I
put
I
discuss
all
kinds
of
issues
and
afoot
evidence,
but
the
reason
I'm
here
is
because
your
chairman
who's
not
present
a
mr.
Flores
Joseph
Ortiz.
He
invited
me
because
he's
been
engaging
with
me
on
social
media.
Tell
you
what
why
don't
you
come
before
the
Commission
and
present
your
your
propositions
that
you're
proposing
so
I
have
seven
propositions.
You
know
and
I
told
them
well,
if
I
come
before
you
all.
What's
gonna
happen.
I
Is
that
you're,
basically
just
a
rubber
stamp
Commission
or
you
all
get
appointed
by
the
council
when
I've
been
on
the
council,
so
I
know
how
it
works
and
he
goes
no.
No
we're
independent
thinkers
and
you
know
we're
gonna
make
our
own
decisions.
So
what?
Even,
if
you
over
the
past
some
of
my
props
and
you
move
it
to
the
City,
Council
I
hope
the
City
Council's,
not
gonna
and
they'll
never
see
the
light
of
day.
I
So,
regardless
of
what
happens
here
and
I'm
gonna
present
them
to
you
all
and
whether
they
make
it
out
of
this
commission
and
go
to
the
City
Council
I'm
still
gonna
pursue
it
on
the
streets
and
I
will
get
the
signatures.
I'll
get
the
7,000,
it's
actually
getting
heed
about
6,500,
but
I'll
go
for
10
and
I
will
get
them,
because,
when
I
fight
a
cause,
I
usually
kill
what
I
want
and
because
I'm,
persistent
and
I
know
most
people
are
gonna
support.
I
I
F
A
I
Some
Ranger
I'll
make
them
fast.
Okay,
I
only
have
seven,
it's
not
like
a
they
had
20
or
more.
The
first
one
that
I
have
is
to
amend
article
2
of
the
city
charter,
which
is
prohibitions,
and
what
I
want
to
do
is
take
away
the
retirement
benefits
completely.
Take
the
retirement
minutes
away.
You
have
no
business
having
so
that's
the
first
one.
You
know
I'm,
not
gonna,
bother
reading
to
you.
I
The
second
one
is
also
amending
chart
particle
to
prohibitions,
and
that
means
that
you
cannot
have
double
dipping
and
I'd
have
a
councilmember
who's
working
for
the
county
or
and
getting
paid
by
the
city,
but
that's
a
constant.
It's
double
dipping
it's
wrong
on
so
many
different
levels,
especially
when
they're
gonna
get
a
pension
and
out
that
they
pass
themselves
a
pension
here,
they're
gonna
get
double
pension.
So
that's
the
double
dipping.
B
I
Other
thing
is
not
not
to
have
dual
office
because
you
have
currently
right
now:
city
councilman,
that
is
also
the
chair
of
the
Democratic
Party
and
that's
just
a
huge
conflict
of
interest
so
that
we
need
to
put
it
do
away
with
that
and
then
the
fifth
proposition
is
to
amend
article
five
and
that's
under
financial
procedures
and
that's
to
completely
eliminate
discretionary
fund.
You
probably
fund
you,
take
it
away
from
no,
not
even
fifty
thousand.
We
have
cookie
cutter
policy,
that's
going
on
right.
I
Now
they
borrow
four
million
every
year,
that's
20
million
in
in
four
years.
Your
you
could
use
that
money
on
so
many
other
projects.
If
you
do
it
as
a
community,
instead
of
buying
bronzes
and
paintings
and
doing
whatever
and
I
have
proof,
though
you
know,
I
have
all
the
documentation
what
they
do
with
the
money.
So
it's
not
like
I'm
making
it
up
so
just
completely.
I
Real
estate
doesn't
appreciate
$1,000,000
in
two
weeks,
and
the
citizens
are
paying
for
that
they're,
making
us
more
it's
wrong.
So
this
way
you
will
end
all
all
this.
Well,
you
took
of
you
wanted.
You
did
a
an
evaluation
of
the
property,
doesn't
matter
if
you
pass
this
ordinance,
you're
gonna,
you're
gonna
make
them
pay
fair
market
values
that
what's
been
going
on
in
the
last
pot
that
I
have,
which
is
probably
the
flat
ship.
I
I
Like
then,
you're
gonna
have
to
hire
a
really
good
city
manager
make
ends
meet,
but
that's
to
give
the
65
year
olds
a
hundred
percent
exemption
and
that'll
take
out
4.6
million
dollars
about
five
million
out
of
the
budget
that
you're
not
going
to
have
anymore,
but
at
least
you're
not
gonna,
be
floating
four
million
dollars
every
year.
Our
discretionary
funding,
because
what
they're
doing
right
now
they're
borrowing
money
every
year?
Well
that'll
be
the
fiscal
impact.
I
We
get
that
four
million
dollars
you're,
not
borrowing
we're
gonna,
give
it
to
the
to
the
elderly
of
this
c'mere,
because
I
think
it's
wrong.
That's
my
philosophy
to
keep
paying
taxes
for
the
rest
of
your
life
on
your
homestead,
especially
when
you
don't
have
children
anymore
and
you're,
still
paying
the
school
tax
and
the
school
tax
is
much
higher
than
city
and
county
tax.
I
So
at
least,
we
need
to
get
some
folks
a
break,
because
not
only
do
you
have
the
brain
brain
right
now,
where
you
have
a
lot
of
young
kids
needing
as
soon
as
the
kids
leave
and
they
have
children
guess
what
happens
to
the
parents
are
leaving
too
and
you're
having
a
huge
strain
on
this
community.
So
with
a
65
year
olds,
that's
gonna,
be
the
anchor
and
I
can
tell
you
right
now
that
that
was
going
to
pass
with
flying
colors
and
it's
gonna
bring
on
all
the
others.
I
I
You
can
draw
the
line
in
the
sand
because
you
can
see
right
there
and
damn
who's
with
the
people
who's
against
the
people,
even
if
they
don't
pass
out
of
City
Council,
let's
see
how
they
vote
on
it.
Do
it
let's
see
how
they're
gonna
vote
on
it
and
you'll
find
out
who's,
who
you
will
find
out
exactly
who's?
Were
the
people
who's
not
so
anyway?
I
want
to
thank
you
all
for
the
opportunity
and
if
you
all,
you
know,
want
me
to
come
back
or
when
the
judge
comes
to
returns.
I
F
F
A
We
go
a
copy
correct,
yes,
both
both
mr.
casler
mr.
Carville.
Yes,
so
can
you
please
make
it
a
point
to
make
copies
and
let
us
all
have
a
copy
of
each
yes,
okay
and
I
want
to
go
ahead
and
thank
you
all
three
again
for
being
we've,
we've
been
saying
since
the
first
time
we
met,
we've
been
trying
to
welcome
people
or
or
invite
them,
and
nobody
has
come
so
I
understand.
Some
of
the
suggestions
might
be
controversial,
but
they
deserve
a
discussion.
A
F
I
have
no
reservations
about
having
citizens
all
citizens
of
whatever
color.
You
know
and
strike
orgasmically
and
engage
representatives
here
on
this
important,
and
this
important
Commission
I
mean
this
is
the
Charter
were
talking
about,
and
so
you
know,
I'd
be
the
first
person
to
go
to
fight.
You
know
the
streets
for
that
right
of
the
people
to
to
have
people
to
petition
their
government
for
redress
of
grievances
to
be
able
to
have
enjoys
free
speech.
F
You
know
to
have
be
allowed
to
speak,
amply
speak,
you
know
and
a
form
such
as
this
one
I
mean,
but
we
have
to
use
the
same,
damn
rule
for
everybody
yeah.
You
know,
and
you
know,
I've
seen
my
company
respond
money
and
has
be
cut
off
after
30
min.
You
know
when
they
try
to
speak
out
on
matters
of
importance
of
public
importance
of
public
concern
and
we
can't
have
a
double
standard.
That's
all
I!
That's
the
only
thing
I
was
objecting
to
well.
F
A
I
D
And
you're
the
first
ones
in
a
year
since
you
won
and
every
had
every
meeting
we
tell
the
person.
Please
has
the
word
on
to
the
public
that,
but
for
the
public
to
come
in
and
express
their,
their
desires
has
to
what
changes
or
things
to
to
keep
in
the
Charter,
so
you're
the
first
and
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
and
effort
to
come
before
us.
It's
appreciated,
at
least
I
might
on
that
point
and
I'm
sure
on
everybody's
for
parts
here
that
we
appreciate
the
fact
that
you
amazing.
J
J
Having
his
points
we've
been
inviting,
as
the
chairman
just
indicated,
people
to
come
over
and
I
I
did
want
to
mention
mr.
Carville
that
some
of
the
items
that
you
brought
up
at
least
I
know.
We
discussed
she
and
I'm
glad
that
we're
on
the
same
page
on
some
of
the
items.
But
thank
you
again.
All
three
and.
A
F
F
A
E
F
F
E
E
A
Not
thank
you
and
I.
Have
more
I
have
new
gained
respect
for
the
chairman,
because
you
know
he
has
to
keep
the
meeting
order
right
so
I
know
it's
just
easier
said
than
done
so
I
appreciate
all
of
us
all
of
you
for
being
here.
Thank
you,
okay.
So
now
we
move
on
to
the
next
item,
which
is
the
approval
of
minutes.
After
all,
the
minutes
from
the
December,
the
4th
2019
regular
meeting,
do
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
those
minutes
from
anyone.
There's
no
dias
any
second,
that's
mr.
Rana!
Okay.
A
So
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
aye
motion
passes
I,
don't
number
for
discussion
and
possible
action
items.
The
Commission
may
discuss
and
take
action
on
the
following
agenda:
items
related
to
the
city
charter
letter
a
proposed
amendment
to
section
12.04,
parentheses,
nepotism:
okay,
can
you
a
legal
eagle?
Can
you
elaborate
more
and
specifically
on
what
the
item
that
the
council
wanted
us
to
consider
was
the
wording
of
that
item.
A
C
A
A
D
Think
if
I'm
not
a
signer,
what
I
don't
speak
for
you,
but
but
you
said
that
all
committees
should
have,
because
even
this
one,
even
though
it's
not
a
foursome
to
that
classification,
but
we
have
certain
influenced
by
higher
access
here,
so
I
think
the
agreement
was
served.
I
understand
it
that
the
rules
you
applied
for
all
community
members
of
all
committees.
D
F
We
begin
discussion,
I
do
I,
do
think.
I
want
to
make
this
point
and
I
know
that
this
is
for
him
somewhat.
That's
an
abstract
concept,
but
the
trusted
confidence
and
the
people
that
their
government
is
better
served.
Well,
we
don't
have
the
oh,
you
know,
argument
of
you
know
it
was
yes
II
know
you
wonder
what
then
I
see
you
know,
there's
everybody.
They
have
luck,
ties.
You
know,
somebody
intense,
you
know
their
relatives,
and
so
we
need
to
to
guard
against
any.
You
know
stain
on
any
governmental.
A
F
D
A
Well
I
say
my
impression:
I
thought
we
had
voted
to
not
weaken
anything,
but
it's
back
in
the
agenda,
so
III
mean
my
personal
would
be
to
leave
everything
as
it
is
in
order
not
to
weaken
any
any
of
these.
You
know,
committees
by
allowing
next
ties
of
blood
relatives
or
whatever
uncertain
committees
only
and
not
and
others
so
I
would
I
would
like
to
see
it
stay
the
same
way
by
keeping
it
strong.
So.
A
J
A
J
F
F
A
K
A
A
What
happened
last
time
is
that
I
had
put
an
item
to
amend
the
section
of
the
Charter
requirement
ordinance
to
include
to
include
an
ordinance
for
discretionary
funds,
as
we
started
to
discuss
that
there
was
a
sense
of
the
Commission
that
maybe
we
should
amend
the
Charter
itself
directly
in
the
budget
area
of
the
Charter
by
stating
a
an
amount
that
we
would
like
to
be
adhere
to.
So
I
would,
through
my
motion
of
the
ordinance,
but
in
retrospect,
I
should
have
probably
met
it
and
we
could
have
both.
F
A
F
F
F
Certainly
anybody
but
I'm
more
concerned
with
the
criteria
that
that
they
have
to
follow
in
spending
it
and
expenditures
of
more
important
you
spend
it
on
is
more
important
to
me
than
having
it
to
spend.
Okay,
have
you
know
and
I
also
made
the
point
that
you
know
it
cannot
be
peanuts,
it's
gonna
be
peanuts.
You
know
and
give
peanuts
is
a
relevant
thing
right,
I
mean
it
could
be.
F
Okay,
this
day
and
age
for
inflation,
all
that
the
dollar,
it's
not
what
I
used
to
be
right,
or
at
least
it
has
a
not
even
used
to
have
them
from
nine
powers.
So
fifty
thousand
years
nothing,
you
know
so
I'm
all
for
exploring.
You
know,
you
know
an
amount.
That
is
that
is
significant
enough
since
actual
enough
that
it's
gonna
make
an
impact.
F
Bring
on
project
said
that
social
can
undertake
in
his
or
her
district
right
or
in
the
city
this
man,
but
I
am
concerned
that
they
don't
spend
it
foolishly,
or
you
know,
on
stupid
things,
things
that
really
are
just
basically
self-serving
good,
that
they
actually
serves
the
needs
of
the
people
and
and
and
and
and
that
has
to
be
there
has
to
be
some
criteria-
objective
criteria
that
that
they
have
to
follow
guidelines.
You
know
rules
that
they
have
to
follow
before
they
can
actually
expend
it.
It
can't
be
what
I
said:
I'm
gonna
yeah.
F
A
D
At
the
last
meeting
and
I
said
that
I
personally
would
prefer
a
limit
of
fifty
thousand,
which
is
what
San
Antonia
has
pretty
much
larger
than
our
city
with
a
budget
so
much
larger
than
our
budget,
and
yet
the
council
members
who
there
have
50,000,
why
we
have
half
a
million
here.
It's
one
of
those
things
that
it's
hard
to
explain.
If,
if
we
are
going
to
allow
the
council
members
to
continue
to
have
this
power,
how
I
would
set
a
a
limit
of
no
more
than
50
thousand
as
to
how
they
spend
it?
D
D
They
would
I
rather
not
have
any
any
any
any
funds
at
all
if
if
because,
if
you
have
something
that
really
needs
to
be
done
in
your
district,
why
not
bring
it
to
the
whole
council
and
fight
for
it
or
go
to
the
city
manager
and
say:
look
my
district
needs
it,
and
so,
if
you
can
justify
that
to
the
whole
counsel
of
the
of
the
city
manager,
that's
the
best
way
to
do
it.
Instead
of
just
spending
it
out
of
your
half
a
million
discretionary
time,
I.
F
Point
is
that
you
need
the
votes
on
the
council
to
allocate
resources
for
your
district
and
what
deeds
are
made.
You
know
the
working
class
poor
from
south
or
it'll
take
a
hit
okay,
and
so
it's
you
know
less.
You
have
the
votes,
I
mean
I,
don't
know
where
the
last
tourists
came
down
to
solve
a
riddle,
but
I
mean
CERN.
Annoyed
went
north.
F
The
last
time
I
heard
I
think
the
kids
were
behind
so
I
mean
I'm
concerned
that
we
have
a
problem
in
the
decision-making,
the
power
in
the
governing
body
to
allocate
resources
where
they're
needed
by
doing
the
budget
process.
That's
the
problem
you
know,
and
so
the
I
can
understand
the
need
to
allocate
like
to
tied
down.
F
So
you
can
put
out
your
mark
so
much
money
for
each
district
so
that
projects
that
are
needed
in
that
district
can
be
undertaken
without
having
to
have
the
majority
of
the
council,
approve
it
more
to
the
budget
process,
which
is
what
is
really
goes
on
in
this
piece.
In
this
game
of
budgeting
and
and
so
I
have
no
problem
with
discretionary
funds.
F
I
have
a
problem
that
even
a
mark,
your
phone
with
half
a
million
dollars
have
a
problem
that,
but
I
don't
you
know,
I
don't
think
turkey
is
enough,
but
I
do
have
a
problem
and
not
having
you
know,
criteria
strict
bacteria
and
how
they
can
use
those
funds.
I
look
at
those
funds,
you
know
I'm
not
for
the
spinet
or
whatever
you
want.
You
know,
because
we
can
always
justify
it
as
serving
europe.
Yeah
I
mean
I
can
already
see
it.
F
D
F
Year,
I
did
not
say
that
I
agreed
with
half
a
million
dollars.
There
are
significant
projects
that
you
can
carry
out
with
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
I
mean
you
could
put
up
a
whole
building
with
you
know,
fifty
thousand
a
hundred
thousand
that's,
and
so
that's
my
point.
You
know
those
are
my
two
points
and
I
always
stand
by
them.
Two
very
bitter
in
all.
H
You
know
remember
they
shared
with
us:
oh
they're,
yes,
where
the
money
was
allotted.
It
just
seems
to
me
that
they're,
just
the
customer
just
have
too
much
free
rein
in
what
they're
going
to
spend
it
on,
and
you
know
we're
always
complaining,
although
they
spent
it
on
this
or
they
spent
it
needlessly
on
that,
there
has
to
be
some
control
before
hand.
A
Let's
see
well
let
me,
as
we
go
under
the
new
law
and
past
citizens,
can
chime
in
on
anything
before
we
vote
as
a
public
meeting.
Is
that
applying
here
because
we
haven't
voted
and
if
somebody
has
something
to
say
I
believe
we
can.
Let
them
say
right
because
that
law
that
test
for
any
citizen
can
speak
them
any
agenda.
K
A
Right
before
we
pick
the
Pope
in
in
other
words
and
perusing
okay,
well,
is
there
any
more
discussion?
I
would
like
to
say
a
couple
of
things.
One
of
the
reasons
that
I
think
is
important
is
because
in
the
first
place,
there's
nothing
in
writing
to
govern
the
discretionary
funds,
there's
no
more
hands.
There's
no
charter
provision
and
I.
Don't
think
that
that
we
should
have
had
it
in
the
first
place.
A
Santonio
has
an
ordinance
so
anytime.
They
want
to
amend
that
amount.
At
least
they
can
go
to
the
process
of
saying
we
will
amend
the
amount
by
a
minute
in
the
ordinance.
We
don't
have
anything
like
that.
So
that
to
me
is
the
most
basic
thing:
that's
that's
wrong.
Now
it
just
so
happens
that
they
allocate
him
out
of
the
bond
money
and
bond
money
has
a
restriction
of
saying
it
has
to
be
brick
and
mortar,
but
that
only
is
because
it
happens
to
be
coming
out
of
bond
money.
A
J
Agree
with
mr.
Rana
there
in
our
SEO
point,
this
has
to
be
some
kind
of
control
mechanism
as
to
designate
what
items
put
our
expenditures
can
be
can
be
gotten
from
that
from
those
funds
that
think
that
that's
what
you're
saying
it's
missing,
there's
guidelines
and
control
tools
to
tell
the
councilmen
what
what
what
it
they
can
and
cannot
spend
it
on
that.
The
number,
whether
it's
fifty
or
half,
a
million,
which
is
currently
half
a
million
I,
do
have.
J
F
F
I
What
the
what
they
do
with
the
discretionary
funding
is,
they
borrow
the
money.
The
issues
cos
every
year
they
borrow
for
me.
You're,
not
I,
have
the
records
here.
He
knows
in
the
budget.
They
borrow
the
four
million
every
year.
Last
month,
December
23rd
was
front
page
article,
the
council,
my
dog,
you
wanted
a
issue
general
obligation.
Bonds
for
in
you
know
baby
sweets
all
over
again.
Why
don't
they
put
their
discretionary
funding
up
to
a
bond
vote
for
the
people?
I
Why
do
they
have
half
a
million
that
they
can
spend
literally
any
way
they
want?
And
then,
when
you
start
putting
criterias
you're
just
gonna
make
it
more
difficult,
more
complex.
You
need
to
have
simplicity
and
centralization
once
you
do
that
they're
gonna
have
loopholes,
it's
gonna
be
very
difficult
for
accountability.
You
should
just
take
it
away.
When
I
was
there,
we
got
more
done
in
this
council.
I
Did
we
got
that
bridge
done
when
I
was
there
and
it
went
and
the
other
projects
like
the
the
fire
of
the
police
station
and
all
the
rec
centers
and
the
library
that
all
got
done,
because
you,
the
people,
voted
for
a
bond
issue?
We
got
more
things
done,
you
know
than
what
they're
doing
now
and
that
money's
getting
wasted
every
year,
four
million.
They
should
come
together
as
a
council
and
agree
and
I.
I
Don't
believe
that
one
council
member
is
gonna,
get
with
another
group
and
say
well,
you're,
not
gonna,
get
any
in
your
district.
That's
not
true!
If
you
want
to
stop
the
church,
which
I
agree
with
you,
mr.
Dane
I
think
those
terse
are
wrong,
especially
when
you're
giving
it
to
wealthy
wealthy
families.
How
do
you
stop
that?
Give
the
65
year
olds
100%
exemption?
I
You
won't
have
the
money,
but
you
will
not
have
the
money
to
give
the
terse
actors
will
not
make
it
out
of
there
and
the
county
wants
to
do
the
church
you're
an
attorney.
You
know
it's
illegal,
there's
already
been
four
AG
opinions
that
they
can't
participate
so
I,
don't
know
how
the
county
is.
Gonna
participate
in
some
of
these
terms,
but
take
the
money
away
from
them
and
it
all
comes.
A
I
Before
the
voters,
okay,
is
she
oh,
she
don't,
and
that
comes
we'll
use.
This
field
get
CSU
ce
o--'s.
To
do
that's
what
everybody
does,
so
they
don't
have
to
go
to.
They
don't
have
to
go
to
vote,
but
yet
they
want
to
do
a
bond
issue
that
came
out
there.
A
massive
bond
issue
yeah!
Well,
why
don't
you
put
you
know?
Why?
I
Don't
you
put
your
for
meeting
every
year
in
there
or
do
I
mean
come
on
if
for
years
that
you're
there
I
mean
it's
like
20
million
every
time
that
they're
you
know
what
they're
just
and
it's
all
cookie
cutter
policy,
and
it
never
gets
done
it
never
gets
completed.
They
want
to
put
a
bronx
order
on
the
bridge.
I
live
downtown,
it's
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
other
needs.
They
should
be
working
a
lot
of
other
stuff.
I
Not
so
I
mean
I,
think
you
should
just
take
it
away
from
well,
it's
not
to
be
up
to
you.
It's
gonna
be
up
to
the
council
there.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
gonna
be
up
to
the
people
coming
because
the
council's
not
gonna
they're,
not
gonna,
vote
to
police
themselves
and
not
if
they
haven't
demonstrated
they
can
do
that
and
they're
not
gonna.
Do
it
anyway.
That's
all
I
might
say
Thank
You
Susan.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
so
we
have
item
B
proposed
amendment
to
section
6.0
for
budget,
the
idea
being
that
whether
we
want
to
put
something
in
the
Charter
that
limits
the
amount
of
discretionary
funds
now,
please
also
consider
that
that
judgment
was
also
that
was
one
of
his
main
items.
So
do
we
vote
on
it?
Do
we
table
it
further,
so
he
can
be
here.
I.
F
Motion
to
table
this
item
because
whether
the
judge
is
here
on
that
or
I
think
we
don't
have
enough
information
right
now
to
make
an
informed
judgment,
we're
still
asking
a
lot
of
questions
that
we
don't
have
answers
to
and
besides
we
don't
know
what
how
to
control
this
we're
gonna!
Let
it
stand.
You
have
some
discretionary
funds
available
yeah
we
can
set
how
much,
but
we
I
think
we
all
probably
gonna
agree
that
we
need
to
have
some
controls
over
this.
F
D
I
agreed
to
postpone
it
at
least
until
they,
if
it
was
one
of
the
judges,
every
items
that
he
was
really
after
that
we
should
wait
for
him
to
get
back
here.
But
to
your
point
as
to
we
don't
have
enough
information.
When
will
we
have
enough
information?
Because
if
we
don't,
if
we
don't
answer
that
information
or
we
don't
ask
witnesses
to
come
forward
and
give
us
information
that
we
need,
we
just
want
to
be
postponing.
F
Any
reason
I
said
that
is
because
we're
still
asking
questions
and
we've
asked
mr.
causseaux
to
step
forward
and
kind
of
educate
us.
You
know
how
this
thing
plays
out.
I
mean
that's,
that's
really
not
the
position
we
want
to
be
in
on
this
day,
when
we're
going
to
be
voting
on
such
an
important
man,
you
know
we
need
to
do
our
homework.
That's
what
it
comes
to
walls
down
to
you
know.
We
need
the
door
open
work
and
not
have
to
have
somebody
else.
J
F
Know,
and
so
I
I
will
do
what
I
can
to
know,
might
won't
work
on
this,
because
I
want
to
make
an
informed
choice
decision.
But
again,
you
know
other
other
cities,
as
we
know
them.
Do
it
this
in
that
way
and
I,
don't
know
that
we
have
their
roadmap
to
how
to
get
it
done
wisely
right,
how
they
do
it,
as
we
did
with
the
other
issue.
That's
coming
up
right,
yeah,
information
from
others,
other
cities
better.
We
don't
have
to
reinvent
the
wheel
and
just
have
to
copycat
something
that
works
right.
D
F
I
would
say
so,
yes
and
I
think
that
that
we
have
an
important
resource
here
that
should
be
available
to
us.
You
know
like
for
the
asking
and
then
we
should
do
it.
We
stood
right
now
today
asked
the
city
secretaries
office,
attorney's
office,
to
assist
us
getting
collecting
information,
that's
relevant
to
this
issue
in
this
matter.
How
do
other
cities
do
it?
F
G
The
reason
we're
having
this
discussion
on
the
discretionary
spending
is
because
of
the
abuse
that
we
have
seen
in
my
district
district
for
its
blighted
$700,000
that
pertain
to
my
district.
Just
went
out
to
other
districts,
okay,
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
for
the
statue
that
what
the
birds
are
gonna
poop
on
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
for
the
vive,
not
the
America's
Boulevard,
which
now
you
all
want
to
well.
The
council
wants
to
build
a
shopping
center
and
two
hundred
thousand
that
went
from
my
district
to
the
lazy,
river
and
I.
G
Don't
have
a
problem
with
you
know
having
the
children
have
fun
in
the
lazy
river.
It's
just
that
if
it's
designated
from
my
district
there's
a
lot
of
poor
people
in
my
district
and
my
district
looks
like
a
third-world
country
in
some
areas
for
and
that's
all
I
wanted
to
share
with
you,
so
that
you
know
where
the
money
goes.
It's
the
abuse
and
the
wasteful
spending
I
think
it.
It
was
mostly
wasteful
spending.
A
D
A
D
J
As
well
the
the
fact
that
we're
gonna
just
follow
somebody's
example
because
we're
on
CDs
and
see
what
maybe
I've
never
been
in
the
opinion
that
I
just
go
ahead
and
copy
somebody
for
the
heck
of
the
sake
of
copying.
We
want
something
that
fits
Laredo
and
it
doesn't
if
we
gonna
get
somebody's
ideas.
If
it's
already
a
invented
wheel,
I
want
that
cool
to
work
for
a
dough
that,
let's
stick
it
in
here
and
run.
A
You
so
before
we
think
about.
Let
me
ask
the
legal
so
if,
as
mr.
Venus
ed
and
mr.
Elias
also
said,
we
want
more
information
in
order
to
be
able
to
eventually
make
a
good
decision.
What
is
the
process?
The
Chairman
is
not
here.
So
what
is
our
capacity
to
reach
out
to
you
and
say
we
want
this
for
the
next
meeting.
You.
A
So
the
motion
is
to
table
and
a
second
all
in
favor
of
that
motion
say
aye
all
right
motion
his
table
and
we
come
to
letter
C
now,
which
is
proposed,
an
amendment
to
section
10.0
six,
which
is
council
districts,
adjustment
of
districts;
okay,
so
I'm,
not
that
familiar
with
this
particular
ones
who
on
the
Commission,
wants
to
start
mr.
Rana
go
ahead,
sir.
F
Mr.
Sherman
Flores
King
came
to
us
raising
the
flag
red
flag
that
there
were
one
or
two
districts,
similar
districts
or
way,
or
you
know
way
beyond
the
you
know
the
margin,
so
things
like
me
have
no
more
than
one
person
one
vote
doctor.
Their
principal
is
was
no
more
applicable
there
because
they
had
more
population
way
more
population
than
some
of
the
other
districts.
F
F
Talking
about,
and
so
there
is
a
rule
that
you
know
you
know
the
rule
of
one-person
one-vote,
you
know,
then
you
know.
Well,
we
won't
go
into
all
the
jurisprudence
on
this
on
this.
Would
you
say
that
they
should
at
least
be
approximate
and
size
to
be
able
to
be
more
or
less
aligned
with
the
one-person
one-vote
principle
right,
and
so
the
question
came
up.
Can
we
do
it
without
actually
waiting
til
the
census?
The
result
right?
F
Can
we
do
it
in
between
in
between
you
know
how
many
years
in
between
should
be
doing
this,
and
what
data
are
we
going
to
be
relying
on
to
be
able
to
to
determine
to
redistricting
Lee
because
of
the
now
the
disproportionate
size,
certain
districts?
You
know
that
would
basically
be
like
one
person,
so
we
asked
and
staff
from
the
city
to
city
secretary
staff
to
to
collect
as
many.
F
Provisions
and
City
charters
throughout
the
city
cities
in
Texas,
where
that
actually
did
adjust
their
districts
in
betweens,
the
census
taken
to
the
census
or
the
reporting
of
the
census,
and
we
have
now
before
us
I
think
been
handed,
and
this
is
another
day,
but
sometimes
act
handed
are
copies
of
those
of
cities
that
have
those
permissions
are
directive,
ages
and
so
they're
there.
In
other
words,
you
know
I'm
getting
back
to
this
and
I
totally
get
it.
F
You
know
what
you
know:
we
just
don't
want
a
copycat,
avoid
doing
some
homework
and
doing
the
hard
work,
but
the
fits
and
its
effect
right.
So
we
looked
at
those
to
see
how
they're
doing
it.
You
know
just
to
give
a
reference,
and
we
know
that
Sonya
doesn't
and
that
and
there's
language
in
there.
It
says
how
they
are
able
to
only
what
language
or
how,
what
track
they
follow
in
terms
of
adjusting
their
districts
in
between
the
census.
F
So
the
question
then
is
for
us
is
first
we
want
to
do
that
and
we
want
to
adjust
districts
in
between
the
census.
You
know
I'm
not
following
every
you
know,
not
after
everything
years
and
and
then
how
many
years
in
between
we're
gonna,
you
know
it's
an
automatic.
Is
it
like
sit
or
is
it
based
on
a
for
ongoing
process
of
having
the
redistricting
committee
Commission?
F
Looking,
you
know,
periodic
basis
on
whether
or
not
we
have
you
know
an
expensive,
pretty
expensive
population
growth
in
a
district
such
that
it
violates
on
a
personal
one,
one
little
principle
and
so
that
an
adjustment
might
be
proposed
at
that
point
you
know
it's
like
you
might
see
it
that
it's
all
going
to
much.
You
know
the
Commission
that
make
is
that
we
want
you
to
come
to
that,
whoever
everybody
in
say
we
need
to
propose
to
them
endorse
a
queen
to
just
these
districts
Brigadier
every
four
years
or
heavy.
F
You
know
that's
the
interval
for
doing
this
could
be
said
and
I
buy,
but
this
would
be
the
city
charter
cuz,
that's
important.
The
city
charter
created
we
get
written,
commissioned
and
provided
its
powers
and
its
responsibilities
reduce.
So
so
that's
where
we're
at
I
think
discussing
that
and
we
have
that
information
from
the
other
cities,
how
they
do
it,
and
so
now
it's
in
our
hands.
A
Anybody
else
have
welcome
what
I
noticed
it,
the
one
that
the
example
from
Houston
City
charters
when
they
gave
us
to
me
I
like
that,
because
it
says
in
each
year
given
which
is
city
general
elections
to
be
held,
then
an
investigation
will
be
held
to
determine
the
population
of
the
city
and
the
preservation
of
these
are
the
districts.
So
that
seems
like
the
right
time
to
do
it
and
an
election
year.
You
know
there.
K
Just
to
interject
just
for
clarification,
those
are
the
cities
that
were
provided,
it's
only
San
Antonio
and
El
Paso,
that
provides
for
both
the
ten-year
census,
redistricting
and
the
use
of
redistricting
and
any
other
time
when
the
districts
are
disproportionate.
The
rest
of
them
follow
the
ten-year
census.
A
Okay,
because
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong
under
the
houston
city
charter,
it
says
in
paragraph
number
three
in
each
year
during
which
a
city
general
elections
to
be
held
city
council,
shall
conduct
an
investigation
and
determine
the
population
of
the
city
and
the
population
of
each
district.
Each
such
determination
shall
be
based
upon
the
best
available
data.
F
A
K
F
F
The
boundaries
of
the
district's
Awards
shout
the
komyatti
boundaries
of
the
district's
award
shall
be
re-examined
and
we
determined
by
ordinance
for
appropriate
following
and
each
succeeding
federal,
decennial
census
or
at
other
times
require
substantial
variances
in
the
number
and
make
up
the
population
of
districts.
Awards
have
occurred,
taken
into
consideration.
Annexation
is
an
exaction,
etc
right,
so
that's
how
they,
what
they
do,
I,
don't
know
how
it
works.
Yeah.
F
F
Is
that
you
know
people
start
running
for
office
the
day
after
the
last
election
mm-hmm,
you
know,
and
they
start
looking
at.
You
know
they're
a
district
or
the
city
whatever
it
is,
but
here
we're
talking
about
districts,
okay
and
so
I
mean
it's
it's
it's
really
not
222.
That
is
anybody.
You
know,
or
just
doing
that
you
know
there
is
an
impact.
It
will
be,
may
be
adverse
to
people
of
this,
but
it's
too
short
to
an
election
right.
A
D
It's
belong
10
years
so
as
to
how
many
times
or
when
to
change
it
as
needed,
or
maybe
every
two
selections
or
every
four
years
or
every
two
years
for
the
council's
of
the
soul,
every
maybe
every
four
years
look
at
it
and
if
it's
necessary
to
do
it
to
readjust
the
the
boundaries,
but
to
give
it
the
way.
It
is
it.
Yes,
it's
too
much
of
an
imbalance
to
wait.
A
Ten
years
and
just
to
point
that
out
mr.
guest
here,
you
have
a
can
you
can
you?
Please
read
the
district
with
the
least
number
of.
Thank
you.
According
to
this,
this
was
a
as
of
2016.
It
says
population
of
district,
two,
twenty
seven
thousand
eight
hundred
and
twenty
two,
and
then
we
have
district
six,
thirty,
five
thousand
nine
hundred
eighty,
but
that's
a
difference
of
about
eight,
almost
seven
I
have
thousand
people
and
I
think
the
Charter
allows
for
a
ten
percent
variation.
F
Hey
I
am
I
am
more
as
concerned
as
anybody
on
this
commission
about
ensuring
that
we
are,
you
know,
I'm
one
man,
one
little
person,
one
vote
rule
you
know
I.
Am
you
know
that
that
to
me
is
something
that's
that's
actually
you
know
that's
sacred
I
say
you
know.
A
cornerstone
of
our
democracy
is
to
ensure
that
you
know
it's
approximate,
because
the
Supreme
Court
has
ruled
that
it
has
to
be
approximately
can't
be
exactly
you
know,
equal
okay,
so
we
can
allow
for
that.
But,
but
certainly
that
can
be.
F
A
What
I'm
hearing
is
that
consensus
more
or
less
a
consensus
that
a
change
is
needed.
We
might
not
be
there
yet
as
to
exactly
that.
Details
of
that
change,
so
I
would
say,
I
mean
I,
know
we
bring
it
back.
You
would
just
keep
bringing
it
back
until
we
finalize
it
or
how
is
the
best
way
to
go
about
this?
Holding
this
item.
Look
they're
in
the
forefront,
I.
F
A
Been
second
their
secretaries
again,
okay,
so
there
is
a
as
it
was
with
item
B
item
C.
We
have
a
motion
by
mr.
Raina
Commissioner
Rehn
at
the
table,
for
the
second
by
Commissioner
of
the
league,
is
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
all
right
and
the
next
item
item
number
five
future
agenda
items
so
at
this
point
is
where
any
other
commissioners
can
recommend
or
bring
up
something
that
they
would
like
to
take
up
at
the
next
meeting.
Okay,.
D
D
Would
want
to
see
all
the
proposals
that
were
brought
over
tonight
to
be
put
on
on
future
agendas
for
us
to
consider
those
that
have
already
been
taken.
Action
on
this
is
where
your
resume
of
what
reactions
that
we
have
already
taken
on
those
items
across
fro
your
those
those
can
be
eliminated,
but
those
that
we
have
not
taken
action
on
either
because
we
have
postponed
her
because
they
may
be
entirely
new
I
would
want
to
see
every
last
one
of
those
issues
that
were
brought
to
us
tonight
to
be
considered
in
an
appropriate
fashion.
F
Yeah
I
see
no
problem
and
receiving
proposals
from
citizens.
Members
of
the
Commission
I
do
think,
though,
that
that,
as
with
all
things
they
should
have
sponsorship.
Each
item
should
have
sponsorship
at
one
of
the
commissioners.
It
just
can't
come
from
the
public
wholesale
and
we
have
to
put
them
on
the
agenda
because
they
submitted
to
us.
We
have
to
be
one
of
us,
two
of
us
or
three
for
all
of
us
should
sponsor
each
of
those
items
that
we
think
should
go.
F
A
K
K
K
F
I,
just
you
know
again,
I
want
to
give
you
know
full
hearing
citizens
citizens
anything
they
have.
Okay,
I
have
no
problem
with
that.
I
think
that
to
take
them
wholesale,
it's
gonna
be
problematic
and
I.
Think
you
pointed
that
out
as
well.
I
think
we
need
to
next
meeting,
remove
those
agenda
items
and
decide
and
kind
of
schedule
them
for
future
meetings
rather
than
to
say
well
we're
gonna
go
ahead
and
take
him
up
all
at
once
and
onyx
me.
Okay,
so.
F
Stand
corrected
that
you
said
you
did
say
that
well
I'm
what
I'm
saying
yes,
how
we
go
about
receiving
them
and
then
determining
the
already
fashion
in
which
we're
gonna
take
them
would
be
done
by
you
know.
It's
an
agenda
item
next
meeting
that
we
decide
then
there
in
that
mr.
W
take
up
any
agenda
items
or
any
of
those
items
for
action
at
that
meeting.
Okay,.
F
D
A
I
D
D
F
C
A
F
C
D
The
citizens
that
brought
forth
for
you
to
get
together
and
and
and
say
this
one
has
already
been
dealt
with,
so
we
eliminate
it
from
the
from
the
33
that
will
be
on
on
the
on
the
on
our
agenda
for
next
meeting,
let's
say
15,
let's
say
25
or
left.
The
thing
is
that
I
would
want
for
the
citizens
to
get
together
with
you
and
so
at
you
together.
The
citizens
and
staff
can
eliminate
the
ones
that
we
have
already
taken
action.
F
J
A
So
we
have
a
you're
on
the
same
page,
bring
it
put
it
on
the
agenda,
those
33
suggested
by
the
citizens
directly
and
you're
gonna,
cross-reference
them
with
a
ones
that
we
have
already
discussed,
yeah
and
eliminate
those
and
then
put
them
on
the
documents
for
the
next,
a
packet
for
the
next
meeting
right.
Okay.
So
before
we
vote
on
this
item,
mr.
Sainz
did
you
have
anything
else
to
say
no.
C
D
This
is
this
is
not
the
first
time
that
we
haven't
gotten
something
that
has
been
requested
by
the
Commission,
so
that
somebody,
nice
domme,
would
check
the
materials
that
were
presented
to
us
that
that,
if
it
was
requested
at
the
previous
meaning
to
make
absolutely
sure
that
that
they
are
presented
at
the
appropriate
time,
put
him
in
a
quote
to
avoid
the
problems
like
the
nation
that
we
have
today,
with
the
resume
little
title,
that
we
have
taken.
I'm
right
right.
So.
K
A
A
E
So
there's
probably
several
duplications,
but
with
that,
since
I
also
heard
that
we
will
probably
not
be
able
to
speak
with
a
city
attorney
because
I
think
that
was
maybe
agreed
here
then,
since
his
public
record
I
am
officially
requesting
public,
a
big
information
transparency,
a
copy
of
that
summary
that
y'all
are
going
to
be
using
that
you
have
prepared
at
the
request
of
Commission,
don't
y'all
have
a
summary
or
it's
gonna
be
sent
to
you.
Can
we
get
a
copy
of
that?
So
we
can
do
our
also
cross-reference
for.
A
D
A
B
K
F
E
A
You
very
much
any
other
comments
from
the
citizens
and
I,
thank
so
the
motion
and
second
to
provide
the
list
to
us
of
the
33
suggestions
from
the
citizen
directly,
so
all
in
favor
say
aye
hi
I,
thank
you
and
finally,
we
come
to
the
adjournment.
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
adjourn
this
meeting
a
movie
Richard.