►
From YouTube: Charter Revision Commission 07/24/2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
A
A
B
B
A
D
A
That
noted,
are
there
any
changes,
men
reserve
judgement
all
right,
then
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
opposed
the
minutes
are
approved
for
both
meetings
and
then
the
next
item
is
discussion
with
possible
action
on
determining
the
particular
sections
of
the
city
charter
that
the
Commission
would
like
to
review
at
future
meetings
for
proposed
changes
and
the
other
matter
isn't
there
and
I
suppose
I
should
apologize
for
the
mix-up.
We
were
not
able
to
make
that
meeting
last
Wednesday
and
if
I
could,
at
this
time
explain.
A
It
became
evident
to
me
that
the
City
Council
has
the
right
to
post
whatever
changes
they
want
to
go
through
the
process,
to
notice
the
public
and
then
have
an
election
on
it,
and
so
I
didn't
think
there
was
any
need
for
us
to
revisit
those
items
they
may
or
may
not
want,
because
I
think
some
of
them
it's
a
new
council,
some
of
them.
Some
of
them
may
not
be
valid
anymore
as
to
what
the
council
wants.
A
The
current
harder
when
you
read
it,
speaks
about
on
amending
the
Charter
and
refers
to
local
government
code,
chapter
9,
home
rule,
municipality
and
so
I
read
it
in
its
entirety
and
it's
a
little
vague
but
from
what
I
understand
is
and
city
attorney
can
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
we
can
propose
whatever
amendments
we
submit,
but
we
will
submit
him
to
the
City
Council
and
then
the
City
Council's
decides
whether
they're
going
to
submit
it,
accept
them
and
send
them
to
the
voters
and
have
an
election
on
them.
G
A
Originally,
the
Charter
Commission
wanted
and
decided
to
have
the
city
manager
and
to
have
because
of
the
problems
that
had
been
obvious
for
40
years.
They
wanted
to
limit
the
power
of
the
mayor
and
they
wanted
a
strong
council
and
a
weak
mayor,
and
that
is
how
we
came
to
the
to
this
Charter
that
now
has
a
strong
Council
and
a
weak
mayor
that
votes
on
in
case
of
a
tie
and
it's
more
of
a
figurehead
in
a
ceremonial
head.
A
A
A
H
I,
have
you
comments
and
judge
I
what
you
said
about
the
the
Charter
and
the
top
of
government
that
he
provides
it?
It
provides
for
a
say,
Council
mayor
I
mean
City,
Council
manager,
type
of
government.
We
moved
away
from
the
strong
mayor
and
took
away
all
the
power
from
the
mayor
and
Ken
and
gave
it
to
the
council
and
the
and
the
manager
and,
in
my
opinion,
I
was
I
was
in
on
that
commission
when
that
happened.
It
was
the
right
thing
to
do.
It
was
a
reaction
to
the
abuses
that
have
been
occurring.
H
It's
a
separation
of
powers
that
government
exercises
in
the
in
the
council.
You
have
the
legislative
power
of
government,
they
make
the
rules
and
then
somebody
else,
somebody
some
other
body
exercises
it
executes
the
law.
That's
basically
the
three
branches
that
we
have
in
the
national
government
in
in
the
state
nerve,
and
that's
why
we
have
Congress
making
the
laws
and
then
you
have
the
president
putting
those
laws
into
effect.
So
that's
what
we
have
right
now.
H
Will
be
encroaching
on
the
powers
of
the
manager.
Several
things
in
here
that
are,
that
are
very,
very
clearly
functions.
The
important
functions
of
the
manager
and
the
council
is
saying
we
want
to
take
those
functions
away
from
the
council
and
for
us
to
to
exercise
those
those
powers.
So,
in
essence,
in
those
proposals
that
the
council
gave
us,
the
28th
27
27
28
commitments
that
were
given
to
us.
Let
let.
C
G
So
then
they
went
back
to
the
council,
they
decided,
you
were
right
and
they
were
gonna,
go
ahead
and
just
put
it
off
and
allow
the
Commission
to
have
the
year
and
a
half
to
decide.
So
those
were
never
actually
voted
on
by
the
entire
council,
for
you
want
to
consider.
It
was
just
sort
of
like
a
wish
list.
Each
council
member
went
down
and
said
this
is
what
we'd
like.
C
G
That
time,
some
of
those
propositions
were
actually
done
by
ordinance.
Others
were
not
needed
anymore,
for
other
reasons,
so
if
you'd
like,
we
could
go
back
to
council
and
ensure
that
they
and
want
that.
The
in
fact
wanted
you
to
consider
those
particular
propositions,
as
opposed
to
you
all
going
ahead
and
bringing
up
your
own
language
and
I'm
determining
which
charter
provisions
you'd
like
for
them
to
consider.
Okay,.
H
So
I
would
want
to.
I
would
want
to
discuss
those
amendments
that
they
proposed
for
us
to
consider,
because
here
we
have
the
opportunity
to
discuss
them
in
detail
as
much
detail
earnest
much
time
to
take
on
each
of
those
as
we
deem
necessary,
whereas
the
council
oftentimes
doesn't
do
that
and
they
they
vote
on
it
and
off.
It
goes
so
I
think
my
proposal
is
that
we
consider
those
those
amendments
of
the
gates
and
there
we
go
one
by
one,
because
some
of
those
are
serious
things
that
they
want
to
like.
H
H
Regard
I
think
regardless
I
would
show
what
could
this
dozen,
because
they're
very
serious
matters
here,
you're
going
to
in
the
council,
take
some
up
and
can
approve
them
and
pass
them
on
to
the
to
the
voters
and
the
voters
approve
these
these
amendments.
It
will
take
administrative
functions
from
the
manager
and
and
given
to
the
council.
So
then
you
would
have
a
council
exercising
both
legislative
and
administrative
powers
so
out.
The
window
goes.
The
checks
and
balances
well.
Could.
A
F
A
You
want
to
make
that
if
you
will
look
at
the
original.
The
original
request
that
I
had
made
to
have
on
the
agenda
was,
and
I
was
told
that
proposition
a
was
to
provide
for
administrative
assistance
for
the
mayor
and
city
council
members.
I'm
told
that
one
would
be
taken
off,
because
that
is
not
some
subject,
except
for
the
Charter
and
that
that
would
be
taken
care
of
under
the
pledge.
Exactly
and.
C
G
G
C
C
G
F
H
G
C
A
A
H
H
G
Now
it's
just
the
city
manager
as
proposed
II,
one,
for
example,
the
city
manager
would
not
have
to
be
out
or
absent.
It
could
just
mean
that
City
Council
could
give
directives
through
somebody
who's
in
city
manager's
office
such
as
the
deputy
or
one
of
the
assistants.
So
what
kind
of
expands
to
power
and.
H
If
you
wanted
several
people
that
that
can
be
yes,
okay,
so
either
way
it's
the
way.
It
is
right.
Now
it's
a
manager
and,
and
the
the
least
change
in
this
amendment
would
be
that
the
manager
designate
somebody
and
then
it
would
just
be
him
and
that
designee
his
absence
owning
of
course,
okay,
whereas
the
other
one
is
a
whole
bunch
of
people
saw
brought
so
I
would
I
would
keep
it
the
way
it
is,
but,
of
course,
of
the
manager
could
not
question.
Is
you.
D
G
I
don't
know
it's
there,
other
additional
issues
again,
that
would
be
the
city
attorney
and
city
secretary
I
know
they
passed
ordinances
as
to
who
they
they
needed
to
answer
to
so,
but
there
could
have
been
other
issues
with
regards
to
that.
Also
what
about
if
we
can
go
through
them,
if
you
want
to
go
through
them,
what.
H
G
D
C
G
A
Me
make
some
suggestions
and
then
we
can
revisit.
You
know
each
one
of
those
items
and
put
them
on
the
agenda
and
I
think
we
can
make
short
work
of
them.
But
let
me
tell
you
what
some
of
the
problems
that
I
saw
with
this
charter
section
2.07
on
form
the
quorum
to
have
a
meeting,
is
for
councilman
in
the
mayor.
A
A
A
A
Times,
oh
I
think
we
need
to
revisit
that
one,
a
new
recipe
and
and
look
at
all
the
ramifications
of
it.
It
may
be
that
we
want
to
say
yeah,
you
know
it's.
Okay
and
it'll
take
three
votes
to
override
the
veto.
If
that's
what
you
know,
what
you
think
is
the
right
thing
to
do,
but
three
votes
is
three
3/8
of
the
other
of
the
council,
and
you
know
it
just
doesn't
sound
right
to
me.
A
A
Is
you
know
it's
a
creature
of
the
federal
government?
We
don't
have
it
in
state
government
and
so
it's
not
defined,
but
obviously
conviction
of
a
felony
conviction
of
missile,
misappropriation
or
official
misconduct.
Things
of
that
nature,
and
then
we
need
to
decide
if
whether
the
offending
conduct
was
before
election
or
after
the
elections
are
doing
the
term
or
if
it's
simply
in
terms
of
the
date
of
conviction.
A
And,
like
I
said,
you
know,
section
2.05
talks
about
that.
The
council
is
the
judge
of
the
qualifications
or
the
can
councilman
and
of
the
forfeiture
and
vision
is
there's
one
odd
man
out
that
doesn't
go
along
with
the
group
and
there's
a
quick
and
they
don't
like
him
all
of
a
sudden.
Ward
number
three
will
be
empty
because
you
know
that
the
rest
of
the
people
ganged
up
on
him.
A
The
the
more
recent
attitude
that
I
would
have
is
that
there
be
a
section
in
here
that
authorizes.
If
the
issue
comes
up
for
the
for
the
city
attorney
to
file
him
a
motion
for
declaratory
judgment
in
a
district
court,
and
then
that
way
you
take
the
politics
out
of
it,
but
I
mean
that's
me
thinking.
So
that's
that's
another
problem
that
I
see.
A
Whether
it's
a
developer,
you
know
whether
he
aids
some
company
coming
from
out
of
town,
that's
gonna
set
up
a
factory
or
whatever
you
know.
How
far
can
the
city
go
and
and
giving
breaks
to
bring
industry?
It's
a
dilemma.
It's
a
dilemma
because
we
want
Laredo
to
grow,
but
at
the
same
time
should
there
be
some
protection
for
the
taxpayers.
You
know
that
you
don't
give
give
money
to
the
wrong
person,
you
know
and
he
walks
away
with
a
nice
development
with
money
in
his
pocket.
A
The
other
one
that
I
was
looking
at
was
well.
He
talks
about
not
sitting
for
an
expenditure
for
an
on
city
government
function.
You
know
those
need
to
be
clarified
or
quoting
whether
the
charger
mean.
Is
it
it's
a
limitation
on
the
council,
or
is
it
not
a
limitation
on
the
council
and
where
does
money
come
from
the
general
fund
or
from
the
users
of
water
or
some
other
utility.
A
Then
I
looked
at
ten
points
for
a
and
B
the
determination
of
election
results,
and
some
of
you
may
disagree
with
me
on
this,
but
the
way
it
is
now
you
have
10
people
running.
No
one
gets
a
majority.
You
have
to
have
another
election
and
I'll
go
determinate
limits,
because
the
one
in
office
stays
there
until
the
runoff
election,
and
so
do
we
want
to
keep
the
way
it
is
now
it
you
need
a
majority,
that's
what
you
need
a
runoff
election,
or
do
you
just
simply
declare
a
plurality?
A
What
comes
every
ten
years
is
the
just
the
adjustments
to
the
to
the
council
to
the
council
districts.
You
know,
Laredo
is
very
dynamic.
There's
a
lot
of
growth
in
the
south,
there's
a
lot
of
growth
in
in
the
north
having
to
equalize
the
wards
so
that
they're
equal
in
number.
You
know
an
equal
equal
number
of
voters
and
you
don't
want
one
one
district
that
has
thirty
thousand
and
knowing
that
half
stem,
it's
not
fair,
but
don't
visit
that.
H
A
It's
in
turn
its
in
terms
of
these
sensors,
every
tethers,
yes
and
whatever
the
census
shows,
but
we
need
to
clarify.
You
know
how
it's
gonna
be
done
and
I
think
we
need
to
revisit
that
area.
You
know
and
I
encouraged
to
read
that
that
section
of
the
Charter,
as
well
as
the
sections
on
you
know
recall
and
the
number
of
signatures
needed
for
for
recall.
A
A
A
G
G
E
Because,
that's
now
to
recall
somebody,
you
would
have
to
have
more
signatures
than
people
who
voted
in
the
election
like
that,
and
that
was
slitting
and
that's
what
I
worry
about.
Even
with
the
city
managers,
we
sometimes
they
give
them
too
much.
Power
and
I
can
see
where
they're
asking
the
city
secretary
in
the
city
attorney
be
responsible
to
the
council
and
not
to
the
city
manager.
A
A
E
A
A
A
E
E
A
G
A
A
C
G
Know
it
came
up,
that's
why
they
brought
it
up,
because
there
was
a
question
as
to
whether
the
city
matter
to
did
in
fact
have
that
authority
to
delegate
without
it
being
in
the
Charter.
So
it
was
the
question
that
was
brought
up
because
of
an
issue
and
that's
why
the
council
wanted
it
to
be
clarified
in
the
Charter,
because
it
right
now
it
seems
to
say
that
it's
only
the
city
matter,
but
according
to
the
city
manager,
that's
just
not
practical.
G
A
I
see
that
may
be
a
problem,
not
because
you're
here,
but
you
know
the
one
that
has
the
toughest
job
is
the
city
attorney,
because
the
council
may
have
some
idea
that
they
want
to
do
something
and
because
the
city
attorney
doesn't
answer
to
them,
may
not
like
the
legal
advice,
and
so
they
may
want
to
have
their
own
legal
counsel.
That
lets
an
example,
not
necessarily
true,
but
it
could
be
true
of
anybody
else,
the
traffic
director
or
any
anybody
that
they
don't
like.
A
Than
the
other,
well,
let's,
let's
put
them
all
there
and
then
we
can
table
you
know
we
can
just
bow
as
long
as
we
can
hold
out
and
writing-table
the
rest
for
the
next
I
mean
yeah.
So
long
as
we
can
do
that
and
at
some
point,
I
will
again
bring
up
these
ones
that
I've
looked
at
or
maybe
as
I,
learn
more
as
we
sit
here.
D
I
think
we're
on
single
just
we're
all
learning
but
we'll
I
think
it'll
be
a
learning
process
for
everyone.
Winter.
A
Didn't
mention
that
I
mentioned
the
the
problems
with
with
you
know,
using
public
monies
for
a
private
purpose.
You
know,
there's
a
section
in
you
that
6.05
whatever
it
was
yeah,
we
need
to
visit
that
one
and
make
sure
that
we
make
it
clear.
You
know
as
to
what
charge
say
and
what
limitations
that
there
are
in
and
the
other
side
of
the
coin
like
I
said
yes,
well,
you
know.
How
do
you
get
industry
in
here?
How
do
you
encourage
development?
And
so
you
know
the
question
is:
who
pays
for
it?
I
A
Think
I
answered
that
question
you
weren't
here
the
way
I
read
the
local
government
code
and
the
Charter
the
City
Council
is
the
one
that
decides
what
goes
in
for
charter
amendments
and
basically,
what
we're
doing
here
is
drafting
recommendations
after
we
take
public
comment
and
discuss
it
amongst
ourselves.
If,
if,
for
example,
what
our
recommendations
are
rejected,
then
our
way
would
be
initiative
and
referendum
to
get
it
on
the
ballot
right.
I
I've
been
through
that
before
and
saw
a
slaughterhouse
here
many
of
the
proposals
that
we
made
last
time
so
so
I'm
familiar
with
that
that
approach
that
the
City
Council
takes
two
recommendations
from
this
commission,
but
I
just
wanna.
Make
sure
that
you
know
there
is
the
Commission
is
accepting
a
minister,
the
Charter
that
that
would
basically
add
to
as
a
different
provision.
That's
not
existing
right
now,
I'm,
not
simply
amending
those
that
exists.
I
guess.
A
H
I
Been
for
this
before
I
served
in
the
Commission
some
years
ago,
and
so
I
understand
it
that
we
are
free
to
to
make
any
recommend
any
changes
to
the
city
charter
provisions
that
exist.
The
only
thing
that
was
asking,
if
there's
a
new
interpretation,
now
that
we're
only
looking
at
at
amending
existing
city
charter
provisions
versus
adding
I
said
having
the
right
to
admit
to
provide
new
provisions.
I
I
Well,
but
I'm,
maybe
I'm,
not,
but
the
city
sent
to
us
saying,
look
at
these
issues.
Okay,
I
understand
that
we
can
do
what
we
want
and
they'll
do
with
them,
what
they
want
when
it
comes
down
to
it
and
they
want
through
they'll,
put
them
on
the
ballot.
So
that
may
be
like
we
may
be
going
through
a
moody
exercise
here,
but
I'm
saying
you
know
the
existing
provisions.
You
know
we're
looking
at
those.
I
If
you
want
to
write
and
say
we
want
to
change
this
or
that
in
that
provision
to
make
it
more
tighter,
make
it
better
more
effective
whatever
it
is,
tear
it
up,
but
there
are
provisions
that
you
know
we
have
in
mind.
I
have
in
mind
to
to
add
the
donor
exists,
okay
and,
let's
say
an
equal
rights
amendment
to
the
Charter
okay,.
I
F
Would
like
also
a
at
some
time
for
us
to
consider
the
the
idea
of
incorporating
the
entire
charter
new
ordinance,
because
a
lot
of
the
ethics
complaints
that
have
gone
to
the
Ethics
Commission
have
come
back
saying.
It
is
not
our
jurisdiction,
because
that
specific
section
of
the
Charter
is
not
incorporated
into
the
ethics.
So
where
did
it
make
sense
to
incorporate
the
entire
Charter
into
the
ethics
ordinance
to
work
by
a
violation
of
the
Charter
without
a
negative
evaluation
of
the
Ethics
Commission?
Well
of
the
ethics.
A
Audience
rather
the
way
I
see
it.
Mr.
Sneddon,
the
sky
is
the
limit.
You
know
if
you
want
a
provision
in
the
Charter
that
says
every
permission.
Any
violation
of
this
Charter
is
proper
for
the
Ethics
Commission.
To
consider
there
may
be
some
legal
ramifications,
but
you
know
we.
If
you
want
to
discuss
it,
and
you
know
in
this
body
that
proves
it.
Then
it's
on
I.
E
A
A
A
6.05,
the
capital
program
c
exception
a
10-point
for
a
be
determination
of
the
election
results,
section
10
point:
oh
six:
the
adjustments
for
the
size
of
councils,
the
redistricting
and
then
I
think
we
also
need
to
to
look
at
or
did
we
already
vote
on
on
eleven
point,
O
two
on
the
signatures
for
recall,
I
think
I
was
reciting.
We
voted
on.
That's
those
are
the
items.
If
you
want
to
include
those
making
a
wave
of
emotion
there.
A
E
H
Judge
before
you,
you
conclude
this
meeting
I
want
to
make
a
suggestion
or
request.
I
would
like
for
for
this
commission
to
the
to
staff
to
invite
the
government
classes
or
wealthy
local
high
school
public
and
private,
plus
the
government
classes
from
Tammy
you
and
LC,
so
that
they
can
come
witness
government
in
action
instead
of
getting
em.
H
But
they
get
right
now
from
the
techie
oftentimes.
It's
a
little
different
property
in
the
textbook,
so
that
I
I
would
want.
If
it's
it's
the
approval
of
this
commission
for
the
each
principal
in
each
high
school
to
be
to
receive
a
copy
of
the
city
charter
na
an
invitation
both
through
email
and
an
actual
hard
copy
in
inviting
them.
H
And
then
a
copy
of
the
city
charter
for
every
government
feature
in
every
high
school
and
the
University
in
the
college,
and
also
a
personal
invitation
for
those
teachers
to
bring
their
classes
because
we're
we're
going
to
meet
up
in
a
set
schedule
so
that
they'll
have
time
to
down
the
road.
Maybe
I'm,
not
on
the
first
meeting
for
the
second
but
done
on
the
road
so
that
their
convenience.
They
can
bring
their
classes
and
listen
to
what
we
have
to
say
and
and
also
listen
to
what
the
public
has
to
say.
H
So
if
you
want
I,
could
make
that
in
the
form
of
a
motion
or
go
ahead.
Sir
I
saw
move
of
what
I
just
said:
that
every
high
school
government
class,
public
and
private
plus
Tommy
you
and
I'll,
see
that
they'll
be
invited
by
this
commission
to
to
make
every
effort
to
bring
their
classes
and
I
tell
ten
amigos.
Secondly,
there's.
I
You
know
I
I
am
a
problem.
You
know
making
a
special
invitation
providing
City
charters
to
to
school
teachers
who
teach
government
all
that
I
mean
that
that's
you
know,
that's
great!
That's
a
great!
You
know
it's
the
motion,
but
we
need
to
make
an
effort
to
invite
all
the
people,
the
city,
oh
that
other
to
to
join
us
to
to
you
know
we
need
to
reach
out
to
them
and
that
and
make
ourselves
accessible
to
them
wherever
they
are.
I
My
thinking
has
been
since
last
time
was
we're
meeting
at
the
airbase
I
mean
at
the
airport,
and
we
tried
to
get.
You
know
to
kind
of
reach
out
by
going
saying.
Well,
let's
have
meetings
in
a
different
district
in
the
different
districts
right.
Each
district
maybe
should
have
us
meet
and
a
place,
but
we're
there
this
year
people
are
invited
to
go
to
those
see
the
Charter
Commission
meetings.
I
Those
are
your
thoughts
that
I
come
to
mind
because
you're
right
I
mean
the
marketing
action
is
something
that
we
hear
about,
but
we
don't
see
you
know
and,
and
some
of
the
deliberations
is,
what
did
they
decide
to?
You
know
change
the
rule
on
this
or
that
right
does
he
charter
provision
of
this
and
that
and
what
deliberations
ye
you
know
it
happened.
Sometimes
we
just
get
one
one-liner.
I
This
is
a
proposed
change,
but
we
don't
know
why
it
was
proposed
or
who
proposed
it
for
that
matter
so
like
in
you
know,
maybe
I
should
know,
and-
and
we
can't
you
know-
we
can't
say
well,
they
know
where
we're
meeting
and
and
everybody
can
get
a
bus
or
a
right
up
there
to
the
city,
city,
hall
and
I.
Think
we
need
to
show
you
know
as
they
that
we
are.
I
You
know
in
those
communities
as
well
accessible
to
them,
and
you
know
and
that
we're
not
you
know
we
want
them
to
be
part
of
this
process.
It's
there.
Everybody
is
invited
to
this
these
meetings.
We
know
that
he
was
you
know
right
now.
We
don't
have
it
but
wait
for
the
first
controversial
issue
to
come
up.
The
press
will
be
here,
that's
guaranteed,
okay,
and
there
will
be
some
controversial
issues.
A
good
proposal
would
be
made.
So
we
were,
you
gonna,
see
the
press
here
from
time
to
time,
dr.
C
J
No
surveys
after
me
to
look
as
if
pero
si
no
lo
sabe
nolo,
contendere,
okay,
Mediterra
mousse,
a
stone,
poco
más,
para
ver,
SI
s
in
and
Uno's
meeting
esters
in
Vita
Sione's
Oh
in
todos,
porque,
puede
estar,
say:
that's
not
conscious.
I
come
from
dear
Allah,
NT
nosotros,
almost
politico's
nosotros,
almost
revision,
solamente
da
Mo's
own
opinion
about
oh
yeah.
I,
get
the
milk
without
corn
corn,
look
I,
said,
publish
it
down:
okay,
podemos.
I
Obligación
de
alcalá
de
las
casas
over
the
clatter
of
the
que
está
siendo
he
que
estás
hablando
distance
is
this.
In
the
end,
all
that
is
pertinent
of
a
pavement
a
vehicle
and
address
cause
us
porque
si
like
at
the
stock
company
de
oligarchy.
But
you
say
about
before
the
Apollo
17s
a
complete
amassed,
an
asylum
Gracia.
J
You
look
into
some
popping
noise
since
in
Yemen,
a
lien
from
populous
and
que
tenemos
a
key
their
service,
trousseau
Pina
on
this
EP
Darla
psyche
and
every
vote.
Arliss
see
I,
guess
a
confirm.
The
corneas
Kim
knows
other
requests
que
no
se
preguntan
pero
se
puede
estar
aqui.
You
know
see
how
much
pianist
in
down
strata
resto.
I
Trabajo
es
más,
abajo
right
piano
so
to
sustain
its
bass,
moon
s
de
las
as
recursiveness
nazar
su
that
it's
just
a
pipette
maestro
VCO
nice
time
que
tenemos
cavity,
where
it's
just
that
the
prisoners
over
es
el.
You
know
this,
you
know
this.
You
know
Sarah,
recommend
that
portico
miss
you
so
this
you
know
where
Miss
throw
a
trabajo
in
terracotta
entertainment.
They
read,
show
they
a
separable.
Does
she
se
ponen
and
I
hand
the
anger
and
say
well,
I?
H
To
miss
Lorena
no
cacao
is
here
is
a
Miss
Amy
answer.
Chemistro
papel
is
the
serial
public
hola
que
lo
que
lo
que
esta
proponent
Aquila's
Pross
presto
del
consiglio
y
las
newest
Rah's,
estas
compasso
son
públicas,
todo
mundo
de
res
man,
aquí
porque
aquí,
say
a
severe
cosas
Oh
save
on
Oprah
Puerco,
suspense
or
consiglio
desi
desi.
Oh
no
yo,
ho
z,
la
paz,
anar
los
votantes
de
los
votantes
de
serie
pelo
de
Senate
Eva
mente
que
teníamos
KeSPA
Kalia
público.
Lo
que
estamos
haciendo
yeah.
No,
no
entiendo
que
es
la
confusion.
H
J
Severe
case
a
trail
personas
de
una
manera,
obligatory
I
meant
a
poor,
poor,
Hakuna
Matata,
vengan
nosotros,
repeat:
Oh
yo.
Para
me:
encargo,
okay,
give
me
an
incoming
dad
with
me
Claro
sir
mr.
studio,
esta
decisión
sobre
ello
parapro
panella
todo.
Lo
que
si
algo
politico
este
promotional
algo
tendremos
que
consult
our
lo
que
manejando
ciudad
para,
que
nuestro
trabajo
es
modification.
H
J
Gobierno
SK
see
entiendo
Punto
pero,
see
you
maestro
de
square
lockira
tracewski
la
estación,
oprah
pony
Ferrara
eso
es
una
cosa
pero
que
nosotros
podemos
pro
con
el
que
Bingen.
It's
not
promotion
de
nosotros
que
no
están
en
nuestras
capacidad
de
cemento.
Those
promotion
be
talked
into
giving
that
key.
Escucha
SI
unit
rocks
teaming
well
que
venga
las
escuelas,
okay,
venom
particularities.
It's
not
promotion
in
creo
que
no
NOS
correspondence,
otras
problem
from
where
I
am
a.
This
was
formatted
promo
vs.,
yes,
term
diseases,
nothing.
F
A
A
Let
me
just
make
one
last
observation
on
this
topic:
we
perform
a
quasi
governmental
function
and
we
are
suffering
to
the
Open
Meeting
Law
and
we're
required
to
post
an
agenda,
and
that
is
notice
to
the
public,
and
so
perhaps
with
the
invitation,
if
we
can
get
a
copy
of
the
agenda,
deliver.
Also
the
agenda.
Yes,.