►
From YouTube: 06 12 18 Charter Revision Commission
Description
06-12-18 Charter Revision Commission meeting - Day 1
A
A
E
G
A
H
C
H
C
Yeah
yeah
yeah.
Let
also
remember
that's
where
there
was
an
ad
today,
but
the
meeting
wasn't
help.
No,
he
was
a
register
to
vote
in
San
Antonio
and
not
in
Laredo,
and
so
he
was
gonna
replace
him
technically.
He
hadn't
been
appointed
so
until
he
replaces
him,
I
guess
he's
still
there,
even
though
he
hasn't
got
a
sworn
in
because
it
doesn't
qualify.
E
E
J
H
H
H
I
H
Just
to
clarify
we're
asking
for
anything
we're
doing
what
we
were
directed
to
do
by
the
City
Council,
and
if
you
want
to
look
in
the
booklet,
we
have
no
opportunity
to
get
a
full
commission.
This
is
the
only
time
we
can
make
it
this
week.
We
have
to
have
what
was
already
presented
to
Council
for
us
to
get
the
language
we
need
to
present
that
to
Council
on
Monday
the
18th.
This
is
the
last
day
we
can
present
it
in
order
to
meet
the
deadline.
This.
H
K
J
H
Started
to
get
the
language
which
is
before
you
now,
in
addition
to
the
language
you
know,
you
have
the
right,
/,
the
ornament
and
the
Charter
to
present
additional
recommendations,
and
so
all
of
these
were
going
to
be
presented
on
Monday.
But
if
we
were
not
to
have
a
commission,
we
would
still
be
providing
the
language
to
the
to
the
young
council.
G
G
I
H
G
H
I
D
I
D
I
D
I
I
H
Right
and
just
I
agree
with
you
and,
and
that
this
is
probably
this
most
amount
of
time
that
I've
seen
them
appoint
a
commission
I
have
to
do
in
the
three
days
in
one
week
is
very
difficult
if
this
is
a
little
different,
because
what
they're
asking
you
to
do
is
review
what
they've
already
presented
for
consideration.
So
we're
not
asking
you
to
review
the
entire
Charter,
come
up
with
individual
recommendations.
They've
already
voted
on
certain
provisions
that
they
wanted
to
see
change
so.
I
H
C
F
E
And
and
I
even
you
know,
I
think
the
council
members
themselves
may
have
jumped
the
gun
and
we
would
like
for
them
to
have
a
little
bit
more
time.
There
may
be
other
more
serious
changes
they
want
to
make
or
maybe
to
have
second
thoughts
about
the
change
they
proposed.
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
if
they
had
enough
time.
You
know
they're
very
serious
people
and
we
want
to
give
them
the
you
know
the
proper
amount
of
time
as
well.
F
C
B
Sir
I've
served
on
the
previous
three
charter,
revision,
commissions
and
I
agree
with
you
guys
about
the
timing.
Very
little.
That's
mother
we've
been
tasked
to
go
ahead
and
review
their
proposals.
That's
the
test
that
we've
been
a
summit.
We
haven't
been
tasked
to
create
any
proposals.
We
have
been
tasked
to
review
their
proposals
and
approve
or
deny
them,
and
then
eventually
they
make
the
decision.
B
Even
we
deny
that
they
can
approve
it
so
in
previous
charters,
from
my
experience,
working
with
the
Charter
Review,
if
you
guys
want
to
do
this,
he
can
be
done
thoroughly
reviewing
stuff,
we'll
look
at
it.
You're
going
that
boom
with
you
there's
a
day,
each
one's
spit
them
up
like
we're
in
a
boat,
for
it
only
takes
one
individual
to
be
around
it
completely.
B
We
I've
been
in
charge
before
where
they
derailed
it
for
six
seven
months,
the
last
one
they
derail
it
for
six
months
and
then
they
took
it
to
a
boat
for
the
punt
and
the
public
shutdown.
So
you
know,
if
I
do,
that
I
mean
that
they've
done
most
of
the
work
for
us.
It's
here,
it's
like
hey
you
like
this
discuss
it
proof
it's
proof
or.
I
E
Let
me,
let
me
add
one
more
thing
because
of
what
you've
been
lighting
us
with,
do
you
think
they
had
enough
time
to
review
these
things
visa
and
actually
make
these
changes,
or
do
you
think
it
was
a
spur
of
the
moment
as
well,
because
they
were
under
the
gun
of
other
time?
And
it's
let's
assume
that
we
say
what
we,
what
we're
proposing
that
it's
too
great,
that
we
want
to
wait.
What
can
they
say?
Well
then,
we're
going
to
deny
the
conditions.
E
C
Was
just
going
to
comment
as
often
previously
to
the
council
members
I'm
thinking
about
two
months
ago
and
said:
look
Steph,
we
see
some
concerns
or
some
issues
minor
or
major,
some
completely
conceptions
of
the
Charter
November
elections
coming
up.
We
don't
submit
these
changes.
I
think
I
spoke
to
each
one
of
you
kind
of
tell
you
where
we
started
with
this.
At
the
same
token,
I
did
mention
to
them.
C
If
you
have
any
concerns,
you
might
want
to
bring
them
up
at
this
time
by
law
they
have
the
right
to
just
you
know
they
don't
have
to
do
with
Commission.
The
last
meeting
was
very
short
notice
as
to
well
it's
just
to
the
Commission
to
review
our
proposal.
Each
one
had
certain
proposal.
Some
it
didn't
propose
anything
again.
Yes,
there
is
no
time
really
for
the
Commission
to
really
get
involved
and
look
at
the
whole
charter
as
a
whole.
I
let
mr.
C
Rotella
just
mentioned,
and
I
will
state
this,
that
you
can
make
them
all
say
that
you
made
mayor
and
they
will
consider
it,
but
it
they
want
to
move
for
they're
gonna
move
forward
anyway,
and
I
think
that
they
would
rather
have
some
input
event
and
I
would
say
if
this
commission
does
not
want
to
do
that,
that's
right
give
the
rate.
I
would
just
ask
each
individual
person
that
the
person
that
appointed
you
have
you
have
what
staff
is
recommending
yourself.
You
get
them
tonight
in
the
next
2-3
days
before
Monday's
meeting.
C
Look
over
it
talk
to
your
council
member.
Tell
them
I,
don't
agree
with
this.
I
agree
with
this
is
the
day
appointed,
and
so
we
have
that
opportunity
at
least
school
review
this
on
your
own
time.
That
I
know
time
is
of
the
essence.
For
this,
are
they
moving
for
it?
I
assume,
they're
gonna,
move
forward
on
some
of
the
items,
and
it's
all
based
on
what
they
want
to
approve
as
a
whole.
So
I
mean
yes,
you
could
protest
to
say
we'll
have
enough
time.
They
don't
want
you
to
put.
I
E
G
C
I
I
I
I
That's
why
we
change
the
constitution
back
there,
but
we
debated
two
years
over
it
twenty
years
when
a
treaty
acceptable
because
I
was
my
commission
was
from
February
of
79
engine
and
the
public,
then
voting
becomes
a
charter
revision
of
the
April
look
of
81,
and
so
there
was
ample
time
for
the
public
to
get
involved
here.
What
is
the
emergency?
Do
we
have
an
invading
army
coming
him
that
we
have
to
handle
matters
so
such
importance
overnight?
G
I
I
H
It's
fair
and
again,
we
were
directed
whatever
changes
were
agreed
on
are
made
by
counsel.
We
are
directed
those
aren't
decisions
that
we
made
by
this
commission
of
the
counsel
but
by
the
voters,
and
we
were
directed
to
make
these
propositions
very
public,
go
to
the
different
districts,
every
single
one
and
publicize
everything
and
pros
and
the
cons
and
the
different
and
then
what
they
need.
So
just
so,
you
know
we're
gonna.
Do
that
the.
B
You
say
this
is
the
opportunity
that
the
council
has
given
us.
These
are
the
recommendations
they're
making.
It
is
us,
as
citizens
appointed
by
our
representatives,
to
provide
input
on
the
proposals.
The
proposals
ultimately
are
decided
by
Council.
These
proposals
are
determined
by
them.
What
will
be
on
the
ballot?
In
the
end,
the
end,
the
end
game
is
just.
B
Residents
or
the
citizens
vote
on
it
to
approve
or
disapprove
no
matter
what
the
counselors
counselors
given
every
one
of
us
the
opportunity
to
put
input
onto
this
and
it's
art
we
can
either
put
our
gun
to
us
say
we
don't
want
it.
Let's
just
you
deal
with
you,
council,
you
do
what
you
want.
Okay,
we
can
do
that.
Another
thing
I'm
telling
you
being
end
up
in
the
Charter
views
I
strongly
suggest
that
we
follow
staffs
advice.
H
G
H
D
H
H
Many
are
there:
they're
started
off
with
a
lot
more
I
think
there
was
40,
but
there's
only
25,
because
after
talking
to
some
of
the
councilmen
who
were
able
to
reduce
it,
because
these
were
already
in
the
or
they're
already
in
the
Charter
or
they're,
better
students,
quite
ordinate.
So
as
today,
I
think
we
have
25
25
they've
been
reduced
to
play
by
some
of
these
again
are
we
that
were
stopped
recommended
and
that's
just
to
bring
to
the
Charter
up-to-date,
for
example,
I.
H
D
C
C
E
C
C
C
D
E
And
and
so
in
listening
to
mr.
McKenna's
and
others
about
this
and
then
getting
more
information
on
these,
then
it
will
actually
be
less
that
we
have
to
look
at,
especially
if
some
of
the
right,
some
of
them
are
going
to
be
recommendations
to
be
an
ordinance
instead
of
a
charter
change,
so
I
say
mr.
Biggins
I
withdraw
my
motion
and
let's,
let's
take
a
stab
at
it,
I
hate
to
let
them
down.
You
know,
because
the.
E
Council
members,
because
they
believe
in
this
and
whatever
change
you'll,
say
they're
proposing
so
I
hate
to
let
them
down,
and
but
we
have
to
advise
them
that
we're
going
to
do
our
best
given
the
short
time
and
if
we
don't
and
we're
not
able
to
go
through
all
of
them,
the
most
important
ones.
Then
we
tell
them,
we
give
them
a
recommendation
on
the
ones
we
were
able
to
go
through
and
on
the
ones
that
we
weren't
able
to
go
through.
I
E
And
and
I
agree
with
you,
however,
the
council
members
represent
the
public
each
member
of
the
they
represent
their
district,
so
they're
speaking
for
their
district
they're
saying
in
my
district
I
think
the
Charter
needs
this
change,
and
so
you
know
because
miss
Hale
said
once
we
make
the
recommendations
once
they
get
on
the
ballot,
whichever
ones
end
up
on
the
ballot.
There's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
public
information.
D
I
I
E
D
E
E
I
E
Recommendation,
you
are,
why
have
it
committee
I
think
we
should
take
time
instead
of
talking
about
all
of
this.
Let's
just
start
looking
at
them:
let's
make
recommendations
and
and
the
ones
that
we
can't
agree
on
tonight.
We
can
set
aside
and
do
another
one
tomorrow,
another
two
or
three
tomorrow:
okay
being
that
the.
F
E
D
K
E
You
know
just
to
take
one
police
chief,
I
think
if
we
say
we
don't
agree
with
this
change
and
we
vote
on
it
and
it
becomes
public
at
the
Commission.
Do
not
agree.
I
think
the
council
will
look
at
it
and
consider
our
feelings
and
our
recommendations
are
be
evaded.
At
point
is
just
to
appoint
us
very
something.
Bitterly
I
was.
L
B
We've
already
made,
let
me
respond
to
fear.
We
sat
together
on
that
one.
Is
it
right
now
can
that
mr.
Castillo
some
of
this
well,
both
of
them,
can
attest
to
the
ability
of
the
group
to
end
up
in
a
stalemate
for
months
discussing
stuff,
that's
off
on
the
10th
and
not
getting
to
that.
What
we
need
to
get
into
the
council
has
given
us
the
opportunity
to
review
this.
B
We
can
say:
hey,
you
know
what
we
don't
agree
with
this
look,
let's
go
and
say
we
don't
agree
with
this.
We're
gonna
do
this:
let's
go
one
by
one
determine
which
might
on
the
grace.
We
do
this
thing
we
go
off
on
a
tangent
again,
we
look
just
like
the
other
meeting.
We
all
many
months.
It
went
by
the
people
ill
and
then
we
finally
got
to
a
lot
of
the
items
that
you
run.
It
loudly
is
mr.
B
D
E
D
D
F
I
K
I
I
I
L
For
amazing
go
ahead,
well,
I
think
our
idealism,
and
that
was
sorted.
It
last
night
on
and
I
think
I've
seen
that
before,
and
it
will
happen
again
argue
those
of
us
that
this
body
here
is.
You
know
it's
worth
its
salt,
that
it's
gonna
come
through
and
make
you
know
commendations
for
it
on
the
ballot,
say,
charter
amendments
the,
but
they
have
to
go
on
the
ballot.
Only
the
council
says
over
96
period.
Only
the
council
says
they
go
on
about
they're
going
on.
Okay,
that's
the
first
reality.
L
That's
the
reality
check
that
we
have
to
make
what
you
don't
understand.
Secondly,
you
know
I'm
with
you:
we
all
thought
we
had
you
know
goals.
We
all
have
to
st.
Louis
transparency,
government,
more
democratic
initiatives
and
our
city
charter,
and
you
know
debates.
We
know
the
huge
won
the
debate,
the
controversial
one.
Fourth,
but
you
know
data
sight,
there's
other
consensus,
consensus
on
their
on
the
commission
that
this
was
important
for
the
people
that
let
it
we
should
have
this
part
of
our
city
come
down
like
you
were
like.
L
They're
out
there,
like
you,
know,
playing
games
with
what
we
had
done
and,
and
it
wasn't
done
by
you,
know,
people
who
are
incompetent
people
who
hadn't
thought
about
it.
All
the
people
that
were
on
the
Commission
less
than
her
on
the
dice
recall
on
both
sides
of
the
aisle
to
interpret
it.
That
way
with
their
research.
L
Some
petitions,
like
our
young
people
as
well
zipper
closes
well,
it
was
open
and
it
was
great
discussion
and
debate
and
I
get
that
even
from
firsthand,
but
for
the
kind
of
Perkins
all
of
that
yeah.
We
took
it
off
a
tangent
for
the
reasons,
but
that
always
happens,
but
the
point
of
the
matter
is
that
once
we
got
to
the
console,
this
is,
is:
if
we
haven't
done
anything,
you
know
they
reviewed
it
and
I
guess
the
the
process
there
is.
L
You
know
communication
or
debate
the
ascertain
debate
from
the
proponents.
Signature
admission
actually
post
those
recommendations.
You
know
I'm,
not
the
drive,
because
I
mean
you
a
Henry.
You
know
it's
like
you
know,
come
pissing
off
hopefuls
of
genomic.
We
haven't
been
there
and
you
know.
Alright,
that's
politics
understand.
L
D
B
D
I
Politics
out
of
the
way
and
that
debate
serious
matter
seriously
and
have
a
public
community
give
their
input
and
then
and
then
we
can
say.
Okay,
it's
been
debated,
it's
been
shot
back
and
forth.
Instead
of
just
we're
going
to
change
the
basic
structure
of
the
city
government
in
three
days,
three
years,
instead
of.
E
B
We've
already
killed
46
minutes
tangent.
We
did
elect
a
chair
in
the
vice
chair.
We
haven't
moved
on
to
public
comments,
yet
if
we
follow
the
Robert's
Rules
of
Order
in
the
wave
that
are
stored
here,
I'm
going
to
do
this
in
all
the
meetings,
because
I've
been
in
these
meetings
before
and
I'm
going
to
push
them
through,
because
we
take
off
on
a
tangent,
we've
spent
quite
a
bit
of
minutes.
B
C
H
B
E
E
The
next
item
is
to
review
of
the
Laredo.
City
charters
have
ended
with
discussion
and
possible
action
of
the
proposed
charter
amendments
requested
at
the
May
29
2008
ena
city
council
meeting
to
be
considered
for
the
November
6
general
city,
election
special
election
and
any
other
math
matters
incident
there
too.
Okay.
Now
how
many
of
you
all
want
to
continue
to
review
these
in
the
next
three
days
and
then
allocate
it
to
us
because
of
the
time
frame.
E
I
We
don't
even
consider
any
lease
for
lack
of
time.
Okay,
let
me
put
her
for
lack
of
time,
because
three
days
is
not
sufficient
to
design
that
Constitution
for
lack
of
time
and
a
sufficient
time
to
debate
these
important
matters
that
the
Commission
recommends.
That
not
only
did
we
not
taken
discussing
the
data
that
they,
they
also
that
they
not
be
of
the
Bible.
You
know
that.
F
L
I
I
I
Right,
yes,
I'm
sure,
yes
and
define
me,
and
even
though
the
council
will
do
what
I
really
want
to
be
Pacific,
they
have
a
power,
but
everyone
in
the
public
will
understand
what
happened
here,
that
we
refuse
to
be
rushed
into
matters
of
such
importance
because
they
have
deadlines
to
meet
within
three
days
and
I.
Don't
think
any
charter
or
Constitution
has
been
amended
that
seriously
I
think
one
is
two
or
three
days
we're.
F
E
C
G
E
E
D
K
G
D
G
E
G
L
H
C
C
C
C
D
J
I
Whatever
they
wanted
to,
whether
we
said
yeah
from
five,
no
one,
seven
and
there's
nothing
like
to
do
whatever
they
want
to
him.
So
our
message
here
is:
don't
be
like
that:
don't
get
politics
so
involved
that
you
you
want
our
basic
Constitution
changed
just
because
you're
under
pressure
to
put
it
on
the
November
ballot
and
quite
quite
mix
good
government
with
politics.