►
Description
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE 060922 - NO QUORUM
A
Let
me
move
or
I'm
doing
this
on
my
computer.
So
do
we
go
through
citizen
comments,
since
we
do
not
have
quorum.
D
A
Okay,
so
we're
just
going
to
move
over
to
action
items,
but
no
action
can
be
taken
since
quorum
has
not
been
met,
but
I'll
read
them
out.
This
is
discussion
and
possible
action
regarding
the
city
of
laredo
tours
policy,
so
the
update
that
I
can
give
on
that.
Let
me
pull
up.
A
My
meeting
notes
is
so
we
met
with
the
consultant
that
was
brought
on
by
the
city
and
I'm
gonna
try
to
summarize
this
the
best
I
can,
but
he
was
very
helpful
at
pretty
much
determining
that
he's
not
who
we
need
initially
to
develop
the
tours
policy.
He
he
specializes
in
just
the
legal
side
of
the
whole
thing,
so
what
he
was
expecting
is
for
us
to
essentially
say
this
is
exactly
how
the
policy
you
know
should
look
like.
A
So
he
said
that's
way
too
early
for
him,
and
the
discussion
that
was
had
with
the
group
was
how,
when
we
were
moving
on
creating
a
terrorist
policy,
the
idea
was
that
there
would
need
to
be
studies
done.
We
would
have
to
organize
all
the
organizations
out
there
when
it
comes
to
the
trade
organizations.
A
So,
in
my
meeting
notes,
I
meet
with
stakeholders
organize
other
economic
development
organizations,
trade
organizations
and
collect
data
reach
out
to
the
community
on
what
they're
looking
for
when
it
comes
to
types
of
jobs,
they'd
like
to
see
brought
in
through
tourist
policy
and
find
out
the
housing
needs
for
the
community.
A
lot
of
cities
use
tourist
policies
to
also
develop
housing,
so
that
was
another
thing
that
was
brought
up
but
I'll
allow
at
this
moment
anyone
that
was
part
of
the
subcommittee
to
speak
on
their
behalf.
E
I
think
you
I
think
you
captured
it
accurately.
You
know
the
lawyer
provided
by
the
city.
E
Is
you
know
familiar
with
the
concept
of
tours
and
with
you
know,
I
guess
their
statutory
framework
and
you
know
the
finer
points
of
negotiating
one
perhaps,
but
as
far
as
the
assembly
and
drafting
of
a
tourist
policy
relevant
to
laredo's
geography,
socio-economic,
you
know,
demographics,
border
trade,
you
know
a
dying
downtown,
you
know
sprawling,
you
know,
suburbs
and
all
the
other.
E
You
know
how
to
invigorate
local
businesses.
Small
businesses,
big
businesses,
with
with
incentives,
you
know
to
intelligently,
grow
into
sectors
that
are
consistent
with
our
comp
plan
and-
and
he
was
the
first
one
to
say-
hey
yeah.
No,
I'm
the
wrong
guy.
E
I
once
you
guys
have
the
the
you
know
all
the
little
details
mapped
out
then
come
back
and
see
me
and
we
can
put
that
policy
into
a
a
legal
framework
so
that
if
a
would-be
developer
wants
to
do
a
project
they
you
know
you
know
here
are
the
parameters
and
those
parameters
are
consistent
with
the
authority
provided
under
the
statute.
E
So
we
we're
kind
of
back
to
square
one,
and
then
that
happens
a
lot
of
time.
I
get
that
a
lot
of
people.
Oh
you're,
a
lawyer.
You
know
you
know
how
to
do
wills
and
estates
and
litigate.
You
know
commercial,
real
estate
matters
and
intellectual
property.
It's
like
no!
No!
No!
No!
No!
You
know
that
you
know
these.
Are
these
really
small
spheres
that
we
operate
in
and
and
these
other
areas
is
are
for
other
people?
Lay
people
play
people
and
policy
wonks.
E
You
know
to
figure
out,
so
the
ball
is
back
in
our
court.
It
would
be
good,
I
think,
for
us
to
have
a
a
you
know,
a
a
you
know:
certified
economic
development
wizard
who
can't
who
is
familiar
with
how
cities
and
who
has
not
only
familiar
with.
Let
me
walk
that
back.
Who
is
an
expert
with
experience
in
the
field
of
helping
cities,
draft
policies
relevant
to
their
specific
needs?
That's
really
what
we
need.
We
need
a
craftsman
who
can
help
us
assemble
this.
E
You
know
very
specific
policy.
F
F
F
We
can
get
a
consultant,
but
I
think
we
we
might
be
able
to
and
it's
it's
more
work
on
us
and
and
maybe
the
tourist
policy
is
more
complex
than
the
nec
and
then
the
chapter
380,
but
y'all
give
me
your
your
take
on
that.
Can.
H
C
D
Was
there
with
us,
along
with
julian
and
george
and
and
rafa,
but
I.
D
From
there
was
that
the
subcommittee
would
bring
back
some
ideas
to
develop
a
scope
of
work
in
order
to
go
out
for
an
rfq
or
an
rp
to
kind
of
get
an
idea
of
what
that
rfp
would
look
like
to
get
a
professional
to
submit
back
on
what
their
qualifications
are.
To
put
it
together
through
the
outreach
and
all
that
kind
of
thing.
All
that
kind
of
stuff.
C
A
Yes,
that
that's
what
I
read
out
loud
at
the
beginning
of
the
whole
thing.
Do
the
cluster
analysis
if
one
has
not
been
done
meet
with
stakeholders,
these
are
all
the
things
that
someone
that
can
craft
a
policy
like
this
would
need
to
do,
and
I
can
share
those
notes.
I
I
opened
it
up
to
all
this
subcommittee
members
to
add
any
items
if
they
wished,
I'm
not
sure
if
what
was
added
or
or
not,
my
only
caution
is
it's
really
easy
to
this
this
this
is
this.
A
G
G
A
We
could,
I
just
don't
think
we
can
class
to
task
him
with
doing
a
cluster
analysis.
He
doesn't
work
for
the
city,
I
I'm
all
for
meeting
with
them.
I
I
just
don't
I'm
not
sure
how
that
moves
us
anywhere
closer
to
you
know
doing
the
outreach
collecting
the
data
possibly
doing
a
cluster
analysis
study,
which
is
very,
very
important
when,
when
I
looked
at
san
antonio's,
all
all
of
their
policy
is
is
side
sites
studies.
A
A
Yeah,
no,
no,
I
I
I
do
think
we
should
have
another
meeting
or
at
least
a
final
meeting
on
so
we
can
provide
the
city
exactly
what
the
ask
is,
since
last
meeting
was
predominantly
spent
on
trying
to
see
if
we
could
use
who
the
city
hired
initially.
So
we
we
should
set
up
another
decider
you're,
seeing
your
head.
H
A
I'm
talking
about
the
meeting
that
we
had
with
the
legal
attorney.
Oh.
H
A
E
About
angelou,
yes,
yeah
so
angelou
this
is
my
take
on
angelou
angelou
helped
us
with
the
comp
plan
and
painted
in
very
broad
brush
strokes
for
what
we
needed
to
do
to
take
it
to
the
next
step,
and
then
we
actually
hired
him
again.
E
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong
here
goes
to
kind
of
give
us
a
little
bit
more
direction
and
it
ended
up
being
kind
of
a
repeat
of
of
what
his
original
discussion
was
for
purposes
of
the
comp
plan,
and
so
we
we
ended
up
not
really
with
anything
coming
to
to.
We
didn't.
We
ended
up
with
with
nothing.
I
guess
this
kind
of
my
was
my
take
away
from
from
that.
E
But
if
you
could
take
the
foundational
component
of
his
knowledge
and
then
overlay,
the
lenses
of
laredo's,
very
specific
economic
development
needs
and
what
we
need
to
incentivize,
then
then
we
have
the
makings
of
a
tourist
policy
that
will
encourage
the
type
of
growth
that
we
know
we
can
thrive
in
and
we
know
and
that
we
know
we
need
to
diversify
into
and
so
yeah
the
both.
E
With
all
respect
to
mr
henry
and
mr
angelou,
you
know
one
of
them
was
so
much
of
a
generalist
that
it
wasn't
necessarily
helpful
for
what
we're
trying
to
do
right
now
and
then
the
other
mr
henry
was
well.
I
mean
you
know
he
he's.
You
know,
he's
a
lawyer
he's
not
a
policy
guy,
so
we
need
we,
I
think,
to
julian's
point
like
we
need
the
requisite
studies,
the
local
studies.
E
You
know,
for
instance,
when
that
harvard
fellow
came
down
and
looked
at
our
demographics
as
it
relates
to
you,
know
a
single
single
moms
and
and
where
they're
at
and
what
we
can
do
to
help
them
like.
We
had
a
study.
E
We
know
that
they
need
help
with
after
school
care
transportation
to
and
from
work
and
school
etc.
You
know
they
we
we
had
a
study.
We
could
cite
to
to
say
this
is
the
path
forward.
We
don't
have
that
study
here.
We
we're
we
are
to
julian's
point.
I
mean
we're
just
kind
of
you
know,
flying
blind
and
and
there's
where
someone
who
can
come
in
or
a
firm
or
whomever
can
do
a
you
know
stage.
The
charettes
gather
the
data
and
then
talk
to
the
transportation
sector.
E
Talk
to
the
health
sector.
Talk
to
you,
know
the
small
business
communities
and
have
form
put
together
data
that
we
can
then
use
as
a
basis
to
incentivize
what
types
of
economic
development
we
want
to
go
into.
If
we
don't
have
the
data
we're
just
flying
blind.
E
I
I
think
I
mean
I
I
would.
I
would
hope
that,
and
I
know
we
can't
you
know,
take
any
action
or
whatever,
and
we
can
have
that.
You
know
whether
tomah
is
applicable
to
the
scenario
or
not.
You
know
it's
very
academic
and
and
whatever,
but
I
think
they
can
meet
if
they
like.
I
think
that
management
can
take
away
from
this
conversation
that
it's
council's
long
overdue
for
going
out
for
a
you
know
a
an
rfq.
E
I
think
it
would
be
an
rfq,
not
an
rfp,
an
rfq
to
really
find
a
a
firm
that
can
you
know
multiple
firms
that
can
audition
for
their
ability
to
help
us
put
together
a
meaningful
economic
development
policy
that
addresses,
and
also
we're,
saying
we're
saying
tours.
But
you
know
you
know
380s
all
the
other
economic
development
tools,
as
it
relates
to
our
downtown,
the
the
the
industrial
districts
the,
but
we
we
should
have
a
health
district.
E
E
I
think
I
think
it
would
be
great
if
management
could,
just
you
know,
run
with
that,
and
you
know
see
if
you
know
they
can
get
counsel
to.
E
G
H
We
I
was
looking
back
at
angelou's
contract
for
this
particular
item
in
2019
2018
2019.
We
had
a
50
000
contract
with
him,
and
so
then
we
got
into
some
kind
of
issues
because
he
wasn't
really
producing.
He
was
spilling
us
on
a
monthly
basis
and
there's
a
series
of
emails
where
we're
asking
him
for
information
he's
not
providing.
So
we
paid
a
total
of
thirty
six
thousand
dollars
for
zero
work.
H
Oh
yeah,
I
think
so
either
I
it's
something
we'll
have
to
take
to
council,
like
you
said,
hopefully,
within
that
type
of
price
range,
I'm
not
sure
how
much
they
run.
E
G
E
I
think
that's
actually
a
great
idea
so
so
that
we're
not
just
kind
of
because
now
we're
just
kind
of
like
you
know,
throwing
throwing
darts
in
the
night
hoping
to
hit
hit
the
dark
bird
right.
So
I
think
that
would
be.
I
think,
that's
a
great
idea.
G
A
Okay,
so
moving
on
to
item
b
overview
of
the
nazi
from
the
building
department,
with
discussion
of
possible
action,
I
have-
I
don't
have
any
updates
on
this.
I
I
put
it
on
there
because
we've
been
kind
of
waiting
to
hear
back
since
that
meeting
that
we
had
with
the
city,
manager
and
other
members
of
the
building
department.
A
A
It
was,
it
was
the
update,
so
edac
passed
twice
at
this
point:
the
updated
neighborhood
empowerment
zone
policy,
which
didn't
obviously
perfectly
align
with
how
the
cities
currently
function
and
all
the
legal
language.
So
what
the
city
was
supposed
to
do
is
essentially
translate
that
document
into
something
that
can
actually
be
taken
act
that
can
be
taken.
Action
on
at
a
city,
council
meeting.
A
So,
for
example,
we
changed
the
nazi
policy
to
to
remove,
like
you,
can't
use
the
nazi
policy
to
go.
Do
a
car
wash
technically
under
the
statute,
you're
kind
of
really
stepping
over
the
line
on
how
an
naz
should
be
used
and
apparently.
H
A
To
look
at
well
not
just
look
at
these,
I
I
do
feel
like
we're
crossing
a
line
to
the
state
statute.
When
you
have
car
washes
qualifying.
Neighborhood
empowerment
zones
should
mainly
be
used
to
target
housing,
and
we
had
a
lot
of
commercial
now,
there's
nothing
wrong
with
mixed
use,
housing
and
commercial.
A
So
we
kind
of
defined
that
in
the
new
updated
kind
of
parameters
that
we
were
giving,
so
we
basically
did
a
almost
like
a
cheat
sheet
of
what
we
were
looking
for,
and
I
know
that
was
given
to
keith
and
and
other.
H
Okay,
so
if
we
have
it
or
who
has
does
our
economic
development
department,
have
it.
H
I
This
is
roland
with
the
building
development
services,
I'm
the
one
that
runs
the
neighborhood
empowerment
zone.
The
resolution
that
establishes
any
z
does
not
speak
to
it.
Just
speaks
commercial
use.
It
doesn't
speak
to
what
the
parameters
as
far
as
what
businesses
can
and
can
it
just
talks
about
capital
investment
meeting,
the
threshold
of
capital
investment
to
qualify
for
an
ac
project.
I
So
we
have
not
gotten
any
council
action
to
redo
this.
So
I
guess
what
mr
robnoski
is
is
implying
that
that,
based
on
the
recommendation
from
redact
to
to
take
into
council
and
and
ask
for
a
re-look
at
the
resolution
and
modify
it.
A
Well,
if
I
can
modify
what
you
said
slightly
actually,
council
did
take
action
and
and
sent
it
to
edac,
so
we
can
update
it
and
it
has
not
been
taken
back
to
them,
so
they
actually
requested
for
it
to
be
updated
and
they
requested
for
edac
to
give
some
recommendations
on
that
at
which
we
did
and
it
hasn't
gone
anywhere.
Since
then,.
A
It
was
a
motion
by
alicia.
I
think
it
was
alyssa
sigaro's
item,
but
I
know
it
was.
It
was
discussed
upon
and
voted
on
for
us
to
basically
give
the
recommendations
on
what
needs
to
be
changed
and
it
being
then
sent
back
to
council,
and
we
already
made
our
recommendations.
We
gave
it
to
staff,
it
hasn't
been
given
back
to
council
with
our
recommendations.
D
Well,
I
see
on
april
6th,
it
did
it
says,
council,
member,
without
and
I'm
getting
this
off
of
the
the
agenda
minutes
for
council,
but
vidal
rodriguez
had
an
item
to
extend
the
nec
into
district
three
and
then
on
that
it
was
recommended.
A
motion
to
present
the
energy
policy
to
the
edac
for
possible
recommendations
and
changes,
and
then
june
21st
2021
and
went
back
to
council
council
members.
So
you
gotta,
roll
you're
right
julian,
requested
a
status
update
on
the
proposed
improvements
and
then
tecla.
D
At
the
time
we
had
already
scheduled
mr
pison
to
come
to
present
to
edac
on
july,
the
8th
and
then.
D
A
No,
it
was,
it
was
never
no.
I
went
to
council
to
mention
that
we
were
working
on
it
because
alyssa
put
it
back
on
the
agenda,
it
was.
It
was
something
you're
right.
It
was
something
started
with
vival
to
do
updates
and,
I
think,
actually
rafa.
A
Initially,
the
one
is
put
it
up
on
our
agenda
when
alyssa
put
it
back
up,
that's
when
we
finally
were
moving
closer
to
creating
that
draft,
and
that's
why
I
went
to
council
was
to
just
update
them
that
we're
currently
working
on
it,
and
then
we
completed
that
later
on.
F
Julian,
as
far
as
the
policy
there
is
as
on
the
policy
number
six
in
eligible
projects,
and
it
does
list
13
of
them,
and
I
guess
car
washes
is
not
there.
But
you
know
it's
sexually
oriented
businesses,
non-residential
mobile
structures,
tattoo
parlors
slot
machine
businesses,
so
yeah.
F
A
A
A
I
And
so
rosario,
what
we
need
to
do
is
go
to
legal,
to
make
sure
that
it
is
in
accordance
with
the
state
statute
of
the
naz
prior
to
you
have
to
know
once
we
bring
it
up
to
city
council.
You
know.
H
Okay,
so
I
guess
what
we
need
to
do
is
work
on
a
debt
on
a
timeline
and
deadline
for
us
to
bring
it
back
to
city
council
based
or
if
there's
any
major
changes
or
differences
from
what
edac's
recommending
and
the
city
may
be
recommending.
We
come
back
to
them
and
if
not,
then
we
take
it
to
council.
So
let's
come
up
with
a
timeline
and
so
that
we
all
know
what
date
we're
we're
shooting
for
to
take
back.
I
I
can
meet
with
mr
cavallo
and
just
go
over
in
the
spirit
of
what
the
neighborhood
environment
zone
was
created,
to
the
recommendations
that
are
submitted
by
the
edac
and
then,
if
they're,
in,
if
they're,
okay
with
it.
If
he
goes
okay
with
it,
then
we
can,
if.
H
If
not
we'll
come
back
to
you
and
tell
you,
you
know
these
there's
these
issues
to
work
through.
H
G
G
I
I
can
I
can
present
to
you
data
of
the
recent
trends.
Also,
there
is
the
way
the
map
says
on
the
naz,
for
instance,
not
all
of
western
division
is
on
the
nazi,
and
so
there's
been
some
customers
that
why?
Why
can't
I
do
the
nec
here?
I
A
I
I
thought
we
did
because
that
wasn't
that
was
brought
up
at
one
of
our
meetings.
A
I
guess
at
this
point
six
months
ago
where
we
were
discussing
housing
and
I
know
rafa
brought
up
to
make
sure
that
like
little
houses
would
be
able
to
count,
and-
and
I
know
we
put
that
into
that
policy
that
we
submitted
to
the
city.
Oh,
it
is
okay,
yes,
but
just
we
had
a
meeting
with,
I
don't
know
her
exact
title,
but
she
she
worked
for
fort
worth
and
typically
any
z
policies
are
updated.
A
F
F
But
there
were
some
changes.
There
were
some
additions
right,
like
I
know,
on
highway,
83
and
some
of
the
areas
in
the
south
were
added.
A
There
were
a
lot
of
additions
since
the
creation
of
the
nazi.
The
problem,
the
problem
is,
is
the
the
way
that
it
reads:
there's
a
lot
of
additions,
that
is
just
raw
land
and
like
swatches
of
raw
land,
and
that
should
not
be
the
case.
You
you
don't
use
any
z's
to
develop
raw
areas.
You
funny
thing
because
we
discussed
today
used
hers
policies.
You
can
use
a
ters
policy
to
develop
raw
land.
That's
very
much
true!
C
A
So
moving
to
adjournment,
there
doesn't
really
need
to
be
a
vote,
because
the
meeting
never
technically
officially
started
right.
But
thank
you,
everyone
for
being
here
I'll.
Send
you
over
that
email
and
also
send
everyone
on
edac
that
same
item.