►
From YouTube: Historic Disctrict Landmark Board Meeting 081023
Description
Historic Disctrict Landmark Board Meeting 081023
A
B
A
B
That's
where
he
wants
to
do
it.
Yeah
Rebecca,
is
here.
A
Okay,
can
we
please
stand
up
for
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
A
A
A
Been
a
motion
to
approve
the
meetings
of
the
the
minutes
of
the
meeting
of
February,
the
9th
2023.
Is
there
a
second
a
second
having
had
a
second
any
questions,
any
discussions,
all
those
in
favor,
all
those
opposed.
A
Are
there
any
citizens
commit
community
any
cards.
Anybody
want
to
have
anything
to
say
nobody.
A
A
F
So
the
overview
of
this
application,
the
applications,
the
owners
sandal,
is
the
applicant.
The
proper
description
location
is
the
e16
of
not
three
and
the
West
42.11
feet
of
not
four
block
25
Western
Division
of
the
City
of
Laredo
Webb
County
Texas.
According
to
the
maps
of
the
plat
there
recorded
in
Longview
7
page
15
map
records,
Webb
County
Texas,
located
at
908
Grant
Street.
This
property
is
located
within
the
San
Jose
International
historic
district.
F
F
10
of
them
were
sent
out
four
or
zero
and
against
were
zero.
This
is
the
aerial
view
of
the
location.
F
The
4x4
steel,
poles
and
the
ladder
the
metal
ladder.
F
F
And
the
Stafford
combination,
so
the
staff
supports
the
proposed
relocation
of
the
air
conditioning
unit
to
the
rooftop
for
the
following
reasons:
the
City
of
Laredo
historic,
Urban,
Design
guidelines
today
to
minimize
the
visual
impact
of
mechanical
equipment.
Therefore,
moving
the
air
conditioning
units
from
the
ground
level
to
the
rooftop
will
fulfill
the
guideline
standards.
The
City
of
Laredo
historic
Urban,
Design
guidelines
also
states
to
use
low
profile
mechanical
units
on
the
rooftops
to
avoid
visibility
from
the
street
level.
The
current
air
conditioning
units
will
not
be
visible
from
street
level.
F
New
additions
and
adjacents
or
related
new
construction
will
be
undertaken
in
such
in
such
a
manner
that,
if
removed
in
the
future,
the
sessional
form
and
integrity
of
the
historic
property
and
its
environment
will
be
impaired
and,
as
per
the
Secretary
of
interior
standards,
of
treatment
of
historic
properties.
Rehabilitation
at
the
treatment
and
standards
for
rehabilitation
possible.
Future
removal
of
the
proposed
roof
axis
ladder
will
affect
the
essential
form
and
integrity
of
the
existing
main
historic
structure.
F
Continuation
of
the
recommendation
staff
does
not
suppose
the
staff
does
not
support
the
proposed
metal,
covering
also
known
as
the
proposed
terrorist,
as
as
in
the
set
of
plans
for
the
exterior
dining
area
for
the
following
reasons.
The
set
of
times
a
minute
shows
that
were
posters
attached
to
the
existing
structure.
This
will
alter
the
exterior
appearance
of
the
structure
and
does
not
preserve
its
historic
character.
New
additions
and
adjacent
are
no
related.
New
construction
will
be
undertaken
in
such
a
manner
that
is
for
a
moment
in
the
future.
F
The
sexual,
formal,
Integrity
of
the
historic
property
and
its
environment
would
be
unpaired,
as
per
the
Secretary
of
interior
standards
for
achievement
of
historic
properties
Rehabilitation
as
the
treatment
and
standards
for
rehabilitation
possible.
Future
removal
of
the
proposed
attached
Terrace
will
affect
the
social
form
and
integrity
of
the
existing
historic
structure,
new
additions,
exteriors
alterations
and
a
related
construction,
one,
not
the
short
historic
materials
features
and
spiritual
relations
that
characterize
the
property.
As
per
the
secretary
interior.
F
For
the
treatment
of
historic
properties
Rehabilitation
at
as
a
treatment
and
standards
for
rehabilitation
and,
lastly,
for
the
recommendation,
however,
staff
will
support
a
proposed
detached
terrorists
to
retain
a
preserve.
The
existing
historic
structure
alterations
to
existing
structures
that
characterize
a
property
will
be
avoided
as
per
the
Secretary
of
interior
standards
for
treatment
and
historic
properties.
Rehabilitation
as
the
treatment
and
standards
for
rehabilitation.
A
proposed
detached
terrorists
will
not
affect
the
existing
historic
structures,
materials
and
features
possible.
F
General
staff
comments
any
any
improvements
which
are
approved
by
the
historic
district
also
comply
with
the
building
code
requirements
and
other
regulations,
as
provided
in
the
Laredo
non-development
code,
approved
by
the
historic
district
glamor
board,
does
not
guaranteed
approval
of
a
building
permit
or
any
other
permit
which
may
be
required.
It
is
recommended
that
all
the
existing
improvements
utilize,
the
following
research
application,
the
Secretary
of
interior
standards
for
rehability
rehabilitation
and
guidance
for
rehabilities,
historic
building,
the
City
of
Laredo,
historic
Urban,
Design
guidelines
and
the
City
of
Laredo
historic
preservation
plan
and
the
proposed
motion.
E
So
Madam
chair,
as
you
can
see,
we
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
air
conditioned
units
moving.
We
don't
think
those
air
conditions
will
be
seen
from
if
you're.
E
They're
they're
going
to
be
in
the
back.
That's
that's
not
an
issue
the
the
terrorists
that
they
show
in
the
back.
We
just
would
like
to
see
it
not
be
connected
to
the
building.
If
it's
standalone,
no
problem,
I
think
that
that's
a.
D
B
E
D
B
D
E
That
that
the
latter
is
the
only
thing
that
I
have
I'm
curious
about,
because
one
the
letter
that
they
show
in
the
picture
little
kids
can
get
on
it.
Then
you
have
that
round
thing.
It
doesn't
work
out.
I've.
E
That
are
are
on
the
building,
but
they
have
like
a
gate
that
closes
over
and
it's
locked,
so
you
don't
have
kids
climbing
up
or
whatever
just
but
then
when
they
do
at
the
surface
the
roof,
they
just
open
the
gate
and
then
you
go
up
that's
a
little
less
noticeable.
Is
it
permanent
ladder
required?
Well,
that's
the
question.
E
It
would
just
it
just
you,
you
see
what
it
looks
like
and
you
know
I
I
just
questioned
that.
A
E
E
D
E
Story,
but
if
it's
recommended
I
would
recommend
that
we
do
it
in
the
location
that
we're.
E
D
E
You
know
fire
escapes
something
more
for
safety.
It
is
a
restaurant.
You
could
have
a
family
there
and
then
little
boy,
I,
say
boys
they're,
the
ones
that
go
running,
but
that
was
my
only
thing
to
try
to
adjust
that
yeah
and
and
of
course
not
connecting
the
the
canopy
to
the
building
yeah
itself
and
then,
of
course,
we're
okay
with
the
air
conditioners
where
they
were
yeah.
Okay,
do
you
have
no.
A
C
A
Rendering
yeah
yeah,
okay
and
the
and
the
what
you
wanted
to
do
was
to
attach
that
to
the
building.
No,
it's
not
going
to
be
attached;
okay,
so
you're
in
agreement
with
a
recommendation.
Oh
yes!
Yes,
the
recommendation
is
not
to
approve
it.
If
you
wanted
to
touch
no,
we
don't
want
an
attempt.
Okay,
so
that
would
be
one
issue
that
would
be
off.
E
G
A
E
We
would
like
to
relocate
it
to
the
background
and
then
change
the
design
to
where
it's
closed
with
a
key.
If
it's,
if,
if
build,
the
building
department
requires
it
to
be
in
that
specific
location,
we
would
make
sure
that
happens,
but
with
still
with
the
same
design
where
they
lock
it
for.
A
Any
further
discussion
we
do
I
have
a
motion
to
close
the
hearing,
emotion.
C
And
then
proof
the
subject
and
common
staff
that
the
owner
is
an
agreement
to
detach
the
the
patio
existing
structure
and
to
further
advise
staff
to
consult
with
the
building
department
for
the
removal
of
the
ladder,
if
possible,
if
not
to
allow
the
latter.
Second
item
B
would
be
to
relocate.
G
C
D
E
D
A
Perfect,
yes,
as
I
understand
your
motion.
Mr
Ness
is
a
motion
to
approve
the
relocation
of
the
air
conditioning
unit
to
the
Rooftop
and
in
addition,
and
as
it
concerns
the
latter
that
the
latter
be,
if
possible,
if
approved
by
the
building
department,
that
you
relocated
to
the
back
of
the
building.
If
that
is
not
possible
in
building
absolutely
requires
you
to
have
it
in
the
location
that
that
they
propose
that,
then
that
ladder
have
a
safety
that
that
it
would
be.
A
D
A
A
E
E
That
just
introduce
tomasi
saira
III.
He
is
he.
E
A
owner
of
downtown
buildings,
so
we're
we're
happy
to
bring
somebody
on
board
that
has
an.