►
From YouTube: MPO Meeting 04/15/2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
afternoon,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
thank
you
for
joining
us
I'm,
calling
this
meeting
to
order.
This
is
the
el
rato
urban
transportation
study
committee,
the
otherwise
known
as
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization
policy
committee,
today's
April,
the
15th
at
2019,
and
it's
one
thirty
one,
thirty
nine
pm
we're
meeting
at
the
11:10
Houston
Street,
otherwise,
City
Council
Chambers.
B
A
D
A
Motion
to
excuse,
as
presented
seconded
discussion,
not
heard
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
against
it.
No
one
carries
unanimously
yeah.
We
have
the
next
item
of
citizens
comments
to
speak.
Please
sign
up
and
we'll
just
come
forward.
Yeah
three
minutes
per
speaker.
We
do
have
to
sing
someone
that
can
sign
up
already
yeah
yeah
Alec
Martinez
with
a
City
Laredo
traffic.
Mr.
Martinez
working.
E
In
January,
the
city
of
Laredo
passed
a
vision,
zero
ordinance
which
will
amend
and
change
a
lot
of
the
current
modus
operandi
for
how
we
conduct
and
think
about
traffic
safety.
There
are
a
few
other
cities
in
the
United
States
of
the
past
were
the
most
recent
one
and
the
third
in
Texas,
San,
Antonio
and
Austin
have
done
it.
Houston
is
thinking
about
it,
but
we're
definitely
forging
a
path
very
much
in
that
sense.
E
In
any
case,
at
the
end
of
May
May
22nd
from
9
to
11
we're
going
to
be
having
a
vision,
0
summit
FHWA
is
going
to
be
coming
down
to
present
they've
adopted
it
nationwide
as
well
on
what
that'll
mean
for
us,
the
Chiefs
of
PD,
the
Chiefs
of
Fire
will
be
those
well.
We
want
to
have
a
cross
collaborative
effort
with
text,
art
and
we'd
love
to
have
MPO
there
also.
So
this
is
a
formal
invitation.
You
guys.
We
hope
that
you'll
you'll
join
us
there
again
in
May
22nd.
E
A
D
A
There's
a
motion
in
a
second
by
Commissioner
discussion:
none
hurt
those
in
favor,
say
aye,
all
right,
all
those
against
unheard
motion
carries
unanimously.
Thank
you.
Now.
The
next
item
is
for
be
received.
Public
testimony
in
approve
resolution,
number
NPO,
20
1903,
adopting
the
proposed
amendments
of
the
20
1920
to
2022
Transportation
Improvement
Program,
which
is
otherwise
known
as
a
tip
CIP.
A
C
Four-Year
transportation
plan
it,
it
describes
all
the
projects
that
we
foresee
going
to
construction
within
the
next
four
years.
The
the
amendments
that
you
have
before
you
include
nine
separate
changes.
The
first
change
in
this.
This
item
did
come
before
you
at
the
last
meeting,
at
which
time
there
was
a
10-day
public
review
and
comment
period
initiated.
We
have
received
no
comments
through
the
internet
or
any
other
sources,
and
at
this
point
that
is
before
you
for
final
approval
and
an
adoption
of
these
changes.
F
F
C
C
C
Bylaws
stipulate
that
if
you
receive
comments
after
the
public
comment
period,
they
could
not
have
reasonably
been
foreseen
then,
and
there's
substantial
or
substantive
changes
like
you're
gonna,
add
another
project
or
the
funding
changes
more
than
a
million
1.5
million
dollars
in
federal
funds.
Then
you
can.
You
would
need
to
open
it
for
an
additional
ten
days,
so
you
could
approve
it
conditional
to
receiving
know
if
you
know
future
comments
within
that
ten
days,
but.
F
D
C
C
The
construction
of
the
overpass
at
Colton
is
also
being
proposed
for
amendment
to
change
the
construction
date
from
2019
to
2020
the
bike
trail
at
on
to
the
LCC
camp
or
the
LC
campus.
Pardon
me
is
also
being
proposed
for
construction
moving
date
from
2019
to
2020,
and
then
the
final
revision
is
kind
of
some
housekeeping
I,
don't
know
if
you
recall
at
some
previous
meetings,
we,
the
policy
committee,
adopted
safety
bridge
and
pavement
performance
targets.
F
F
C
C
C
A
G
Think
there's
a
I
think:
there's
a
problems,
a
presentation
towards
the
any
of
these
ginned
items
that
we're
gonna
be
discussing
that
landing
itself
today,
but
again,
miss
Vanessa,
she's,
correct,
we'll
have
to
look
at
funding
sources
projects
you
never
willing
to
move
this
forward.
Will
it
be
added
today
I?
Don't
think
that
we
could
do
that
right
now,
correct
yeah.
G
C
H
Of
wrecking
director
of
traffic
operation
for
text
on
text
on
the
stable
radio
have
a
contract,
it's
called
municipal
mains
agreement
for
that
agreement.
The
city
is
solely
responsible
for
installing
designing,
maintaining
and
operating
traffic
lights
that
are
on
the
state
system
inside
the
city
limits
so
in
when,
in
certain
circumstances,
we
have
print
project,
sometimes
will
install
those
traffic
signals.
Though,
when
it's
a
road,
that's
already
there,
that's
a
city
responsibility
to
construct
it
so.
H
H
H
H
Yes,
I
do
have
presentation
prepared
when
the
record
called
up
concerning
the
accidents
that
were
happening
during
nighttime
hours.
It
does
not
address
putting
the
traffic
signal.
We
did
a
lot
of
work
when
the
domains
was
open
back
in
2012.
To
put
those
acceleration/deceleration
lanes
and
you'll
see
the
numbers
it
that
the
crash
rate
has
gone
down
substantially
every
year.
So
all
the
rest,
those
things
now
were
there
as
you.
C
A
I
know
this
is
a
big
busy
area
as
well.
You
know
yeah,
the
last
appropriate
in
a
city
council
years
ago,
I
was
allotted,
you
know
so
many
dollars.
You
know
for
major
construction,
you
know.
Maybe
this
is
something
that
I've
you
know
through
my
pond.
You
know
we
could.
You
know
work
something
out.
Excuse.
H
Whole
thing
about
traffic
singles
and
no
Padre
vientos
yeah,
where
the
connections
for
the
streets
are
one
of
the
reasons
we
haven't
within
allow
traffic
signals
it
lomis
a
suit,
for
instance,
is
that
we
have
a
sight
distance
problem
there,
so
that
needs
to
be
taken
care
of
before.
Even
the
traffic
signal
gets
put
in
you.
H
F
G
I
think
the
key
here
Vanessa
said
that
it
doesn't
have
to
necessarily
be
entered
into
the
tip,
because
there's
no
state
or
federal
funds
associated
today
are
we
willing
to
work
with
the
city
to
input
something
based
on
the
project,
that's
needed
by
the
city
or
the
funds
that
are
available
by
the
city.
We
can
certainly
do
that,
but
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
on
the
tip
and.
J
I
think
we
need
to
start
addressing
the
issue
that
we
have
they're
animals
at
our
school,
because
if
we
we,
the
county
in
textile
work
together
to
bring
the
the
realignment
forms
or
to
low
mother
soon,
that's
gonna
be
important,
they're,
a
portkey
that
we
have
that
traffic.
So
you
know
at
least
on
that
location,
because
it's
gonna
be
created
a
lot
of
traffic,
but
like.
H
I
said:
I
know
that,
with
this
made,
it
bit
wrong
forum
for
it,
but
there's
a
lot
of
things
to
think
about.
We
put
fabrics
in
right
now,
you're
thinking
about
getting
cars
out.
But
when
you
put
traffic
signals
you
introduce
a
whole
different
kind
of
accidents
and
the
speed
limit
out
there
is
65
and
people
are
driving
75
80
miles
an
hour.
Well.
J
Nevertheless,
when
that
that
road
was
created,
it
was
created
for
a
purpose
either
to
have
traffic
signals
or
overpasses,
but
right
that
road
is
not
completely
up
today.
We
need
to
make
sure
we
do
it
one
way
or
another,
but
traffic
has
to
flow.
You
know
at
the
same
time
when
you're
coming
from
east
east
to
west
or
west
to
east,
because
right
now,
it's
just
north
to
south,
so.
K
G
We're
we're
quite
aware
of
that
and
you
collect
Luke
20.
The
same
scenario
wasn't
created
how
those
trucks
and
was
out
there,
the
main
ones
at
the
airport.
You
know
that's
a
big
issue
for
us
right
now.
It
does.
It
does
create
a
issue
when
you
have
traffic
backed
up.
If
I
have
a
clock,
it's
ten
toes.
You
know
we
built
what
we
could
at
that
time.
J
The
timeline
that
we're
seeing
or
will
be
there
because
again
you
know
South
Laredos,
it's
one
of
the
biggest
areas,
that's
growing
right
now,
traffic
issues,
I
was
going
to
be
an
issue
there.
Now,
whenever
that
I
think
Lomas
will
be
the
main
intersection
of
all
of
them.
I
think
that's
the
one
that
has
the
four
lanes
or
five
lanes
with
a
turning
lane,
and
if
we
do
that
realignment
again,
you
know
we
got
to
be
prepared
for
for
what
we're
dealing
with
right
now,
not
the
future.
H
For
the
right
now,
in
my
opinion,
it's
working
much
better
the
way
it
is
in
putting
travel
students
you're
kind
of
right.
Now
we
have
a
ring
speed
up
65
miles
an
hour.
The
many
pictures,
vecinos
you're,
going
to
start
going
down,
30
40
miles
an
hour
and
the
accidents
will
increase
the
different
kinds
of
accidents
right
now
you
come
out
a
little
bit
too
soon.
You
take
her
right.
You
go
down,
maybe
half
a
mile
make
a
u-turn.
We
did
that
for
every
major
intersection
you
miss
Evita
Lindo.
H
L
H
Of
them
might
have
a
mouth
from
city
to
Lindo,
that's
so
many
other
ones.
Every
morning
I
go
down
from
where
I
work
I
mean
so
where
I
live,
go
down
to
Lomas
of
so
to
make
a
u-turn,
there's
no
different
for
me
with
major
town.
You
know
nobody
gets
a
connection.
Every
street
right
right
turn
some
10
cents
a
mile,
but
you
make
it
right.
You
don't
have
to
wait
for
traffic,
see.
What's.
G
D
Really
for
David
I
guess
you
know
when
they
built
that
cuatro
Vientos
I
was
totally
against
the
limited
access
where,
with
no
frontage,
roads,
I
think
you've
seen
the
problems
that
it
created
over
there
plus
you
have.
You
lost
the
economic
development
you
know,
selling
along
those
foreign
throats.
Can
we
look
to
maybe
start
frontage
roads
going
south
from
the
ports?
It's
not
developed,
I.
Think
I.
G
Think
what
we're
doing
right
now
is
that
I
believe
the
right-of-way
is,
why
don't
know
if
what
we
thought
ahead
of
ourselves
and
we?
Why
not
the
ride
away?
So
we
could
do
a
future
expansion,
and
so
I
was
a
key
for
us
getting
that
right
away,
so
we
can
expand
in
the
future.
Are
we
looking
at?
Yes,
we
are
looking
at
and
we're
looking
at
different
options.
Are
they
funny
right
now,
no
they're
not,
but
at.
D
Least
as
long
as
we
secure
the
right
way
to
be
able
to
have
those
frontage
roads
to
create
that
economic
development
and
really
because
it
puts
the
burden
on
the
persons
the
developers
to
put
that
internal.
You
know
major
thoroughfare
in
there,
which
doesn't
always
connect,
always
happened,
and,
and
it
really
makes
it
hard
on
traffic
and
I,
think
you
know
the
Commissioner
and
all
those
that
represent
the
south,
see
it
everywhere.
G
M
L
I
C
A
I
C
No,
we
don't
have.
We
don't
have
like
a
an
item
status
of
ongoing
projects
with
regard
to
these
I
know,
text
art
has
an
item
on
the
agenda,
but
not
on
the
sort
of
the
city.
These
are
the
sort
of
the
city
projects,
the
only
time
that
they
would
is
when
we
need
to
move
them,
and
this
is
about
when
you're
hearing
you
know
we're
not
going
to
make
those
construction
deadlines
or
the
initiate
the
construction.
So
this
is
this
is
when
this
would
come
before
this
body.
So.
I
C
A
M
A
Motion
is
there
a
second
second?
Second,
this
discussion,
none
heard
those
in
favor,
say
aye,
those
against
not
heard
motion
carries
unanimously
yeah
again
this
is
a
public
hearing
and
it
has
seen
yeah
the
same
yeah
the
same
one
said
it's
the
same
stuff
portions.
There
and
again
it's
a
public
hearing.
Anyone
wishing
to
speak
four
against
four
against
four.
A
I
N
My
name
is
Susan
Chavez
I'm,
with
techstop
transportation,
planning
and
programming
division,
and
this
is
I'm
gonna
introduce
consultant,
that's
been
working
with
me.
This
is
Travis
Norton
with
Jacobs
for
the
past
year,
so
we've
been
looking
at
the
national
highway
system
throughout
the
state.
Really
just
wanting
to
do
some
cleanup
on
the
network.
National
highway
system
was
established
in
the
90s
and
map-21
in
2012
added
a
lot
of
principal
arterials
to
the
network
in
one
fell
swoop.
N
We
really
haven't
done
an
overall
assessment
of
it
all
to
make
sure
those
were
the
right
roads
that
really
rise
to
the
level
of
national
highway
system
criteria.
They
were
just
sort
of
gathered
in
and
dumped
onto
the
system,
so
we're
taking
this
opportunity
to
do
that
throughout
the
state
we've
met
with
all
the
MPS
in
the
state,
maybe
except
for
two
we're
almost
there,
but
we
have
met
with
Vanessa,
and
today
we
held
a
workshop
with
your
TAC
to
talk
about
the
NHS
in
Laredo
in
the
Laredo
MPO
area.
N
C
Mr.
mayor,
if
I
could
give
just
a
tiny
bit
of
preference
to
this
what's
happening,
is
that
text
ID
and
federal
highways
is
coming
to
us
to
review
the
roads
on
our
current
network
that
are
included
in
the
national
highway
system
and
they've
developed
a
bunch
of
criteria
by
which
they've
shown?
Ok,
these
meet
the
criteria
for
inclusion,
and
maybe
these
not
so
much.
We've
met
with
a
technical
committee
and
they've
developed
some
recommendations
for
if
we're
gonna,
either
add
more
roads.
C
If
we're
gonna
remove
roads
from
the
national
highway
system
and
at
this
time
there's
no
no
need
for
action
on
part
of
the
policy
committee.
What
we
wanted
to
do
is
introduce
it
to
you
so
that
you
all
have
a
good
idea
of
what's
happening
and
at
a
subsequent
meeting,
probably
the
next
MPL
meeting
would
come
before
you
get
a
resolution,
because
that's
what
federal
highways
and
textile
is
requiring
of
us.
C
O
Travis
Thornton
from
Jacobs,
so
I'm
just
gonna,
get
a
quick
background
on
the
national
highway
system
and
then
a
high-level
summary
of
our
review
as
Susan
mentioned.
This
is
the
first
effort
to
review
the
system
statewide
since
it
was
created
in
1995,
and
the
national
highway
system
exists,
to
bring
a
focus
on
the
roads
are
the
most
important
for
long
distance
mobility.
It's
a
movement
of
people
and
goods
being
on
the
national
highway
system
makes
a
roadway
eligible
for
certain
federal
funding.
O
Other
roads
can
be
eligible
for
federal
funding,
but
NHS
designation
makes
a
road
eligible
for
the
highest
standard
of
federal
funds
on
NHS
facilities.
You
also
have
to
track
performance
measures,
so
these
performance
measures
that
they
all
been
discussing
are
for
the
national
highway
system
and
then
projects
in
the
national
highway
system
have
to
meet
federal
design
standards.
So
that's
the
highest
standard
for
roadway
design.
A
little
bit
of
background
on
the
NHS
in
Laredo.
O
There
are
115
centerline
miles,
that's
12%
of
all
the
miles
in
the
in
the
MPO
area.
Those
12
percent
of
miles
carry
two
million
daily
via
miles
traveled.
So
that's
12.
That's
55%
of
all
travel
in
the
NPO
area
and
then
that
also
carries
81
percent
of
all
truck
VMT,
so
81
percent
of
all
truck
travel
in
the
NPO
area
occurs
on
the
national
highway
system.
O
So
when
trying
to
see
what
should
and
shouldn't
be
on
that
network,
we
tried
to
use
as
much
data
as
possible
in
our
initial
review
before
we
brought
the
suggestions
to
the
NPO
for
their
consideration
and
we're
also
trying
to
align
with
the
federal
process
for
modifying
the
national
highway
system,
which
involves
lots
of
concurrence
from
from
the
NPO.
You
can
see
here
on
the
on
the
slides,
the
official
definition
of
the
national
highway
system
that
FHWA
has
put
together
so
for
Road
to
be
on
the
NHS.
O
It
needs
to
be
functionally
classified
as
a
principal
arterial.
It
needs
to
interconnect
on
both
ends,
so
it
can't
stub
out
into
nothing.
You
need
to
connect
to
the
national
highway
system
continuously,
and
then
it
also
needs
to
provide
access
to
major
activity.
Centers,
ports,
airports,
border
crossings,
so
these
are
the
roads
that
FHWA
thinks
need
to
get
the
the
highest
consideration
for
major
major
funding
and
improvement.
A
L
N
N
N
M
N
I
I
A
L
J
P
I
guess
we
touched
base
a
while
back,
and
maybe
someone
from
the
tech
stop
make
a
little
chime
in
but
I
know
there
was
a
faster
resolution
to
reclassify
farm-to-market,
1472,
otherwise
known
as
mines
Road
into
hi,
a
highways
that
wasn't
correct.
How
did
that
come
across?
What
was
our
resolution
you
know?
Can
you
want
to
speak
to
that.
Q
P
Q
C
Q
G
G
A
C
C
N
D
A
N
A
M
L
C
P
Q
B
P
Because
if
you
look
at
the
valley,
it's
just
done
recently
with
their
MP
le
consolidated
the
vast
majority
of
the
valley
into
one
single
MPO,
which
now
throws
them
into
another
funding
bracket,
a
bigger
end
zone,
small
fries
like
us,
or
fighting
over
bread
crumbs,
except
if
we
were
to
reach
you
know
grown-up
status.
We
might
be
able
to
get
meaningful
funding
anyway.
N
C
Criteria
would
include-
and
this
is
what
the
recommendations
were
made
on
the
criteria
include:
does
it
serve
major
activity
centers?
Does
it
serve
long
distance
travel?
Does
it
link
so
the
surrounding
region
to
the
urban
core?
Does
it
limit
it?
Does
it
have
limited
access
to
the
surrounding
land
uses,
meaning
doesn't
have
a
ton
of
driveways
and
does
it
link
to
other
major
regional
facilities,
the
criteria.
C
A
G
G
C
C
C
C
C
P
C
Does
what
it
is
is
we're
required
to
federally
functionally
classify
our
roads
and
in
federal,
functional
classification
is
different
than
the
thoroughfare
classification
thoroughfare.
You
know
the
comp
plan
and
therfore
plan
that
identifies
how
we
want
the
roads
to
work
twenty
years
from
now
so,
but
these
federal
functional
classifications
are
based
on.
How
is
the
work
work?
How
is
the
road
working
today
so
right
now
we
have
a
tiny
portion
of
Santa
Maria
that
that
has
been
designated
or
classified
as
principal
arterial,
but
the
rest
of
it
is
a
minor
arterial
in
discussing
it.
C
P
C
C
That's
why
you
didn't
see
the
green
yeah
I.
Remember
in
this
slide.
Sorry
there's
the
green,
so
you
see
the
red
that
that
portion.
Can
you
point
that
point
that
that
red
section
of
something
is
right
now
it's
classified
as
principal
arterial
and
then
the
green
section
below
it
is
all
classified
as
minor
Ontario
right.
M
C
P
There's
trucks
that
still
drive
through
there
on
a
daily
basis.
If
you,
if
you
had
a
a
overflight,
google
overflight
image,
you
can
see
all
the
warehouses,
I
mean
it's
a
it's
a
big
trade
hub
and
then
and
then
to
the
mayor's
point.
If
you
look
at
the
parallel
to
something,
money
has
a
green
line
that
runs
parallel
to
the
river,
the
yeah
name.
It's
called.
M
P
Has
a
lot
of
18-wheeler
traffic
on
that
york
as
well?
It's
a
designated
truck
route
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I'm,
not
sure
why
that
one's
there
I
would
see
that
one
Chuck
should
probably
be
upgraded.
In
my
estimation,
all
the
way
to
the
flyover
all
the
way
to
the
flyover
and
that
green
line
from
Ana
along
the
rail
line
to
the
flyover.
That's
a
myth
that
doesn't
really
exist.
I,
don't
think
I
mean
I've
been
up
there
numerous
times
there
is.
You
can't
drive
to
the
fly
or
hit,
but
it'd
be
great.
P
D
P
A
C
C
P
D
L
Think
about
what
what
that
does
is
we're
trying
to
bypass
you
know
all
that
traffic
there
and
make
that
the
major
art
room
where
we
have
truck
traffic
over
the
northern
north
and
south.
Oh
yeah,
West
Road,
as
opposed
to
having
them
go
through
the
city
and
so
got
some
funds.
It
would
be
towards
trying
to
bypass.
G
C
G
M
P
N
A
N
C
P
C
R
Good
afternoon,
from
Chavez
city
engineer
for
the
record,
a
lot
of
much
of
the
discussion
that
you're
having
here
the
work,
some
of
the
same
points
that
staff
was
bringing
up.
At
the
same
time,
we
could
only
base
ourselves
on
this
study
and
looking
at
that,
for
example,
right
now,
Killam
industrial.
Well,
that
was
something
that
we
discussed
early
but
then
again,
looking
at
the
functional
classification
review,
it
only
met
I'm,
gonna,
say
one
of
the
five
criteria
so
there.
R
R
C
C
M
P
So
serving
a
major
activity
center
well
I
mean
if
the
world
trade
isn't
a
major
activity
center
I,
don't
know
what
is
long.
Distance
travel
I
mean
these
you've
got
long.
Haul
short
haul
truckers
I
mean
that's
clearly
long
distance
travel
linking
the
surrounding
region
with
the
urban
core.
Okay,
maybe
we
can.
We
can
debate
that
limit
access
to
surrounding
land
uses,
so
the
surrounding
land
uses
for
the
most
part
or
does
it
so.
The
question
is
this:
a
quick
little
access
to
surrounding.
D
M
L
P
But
you
can
get
I
just
kind
of
if
we
didn't
run
and
you're
on
point,
but
if
we
didn't
kind
of
like
go
through
the
intellectual
exercise
of
the
fact
that
some
of
these
nodes
are
actually
yeses,
then
we
end
up
with
a
TRB
that
is
looking
through
a
different
lens.
We
look
through
the
lens
of
constituents
and
business
owners
and
and
what
we
know
is
that
that
it
does
meet
these
criteria.
I
mean
a
major
activity
center
I'm
coming
I'm,
not
arguing
with
you.
P
You
just
happen
to
be
standing
there
at
the
trapdoor
as
I
speak,
but
the
I
mean
it's
clearly,
it's
close
to
major
activity
center
and
clearly
it's
serving
long
distance
travel
and-
and
there
seems
to
be
some
consensus
that
it
does
limit
access.
So
let's
send
this
I
guess
you'll
want
to
send
this
back
to
the
TRB
and
let's
see
if
they
don't
just
kick
something
back
to
us.
I.
D
Q
C
I
G
D
G
Think
it
I
think
at
this
point,
there's
there's
so
many
questions
up
here
and
what
we're
looking
at
and
Vanessa
you're.
Absolutely
right.
You
can
put
roadway
on
the
national
highway
system,
but
to
answer
mr.
garrow's
remark,
we
will
have
to
maintain
a
certain
criteria.
People
on
that
system,
I
think
we're
lost
in
the
transition
of
a
in
the.
G
M
P
G
Consummated,
you
have
all
the
full
details.
It's
not
just
a
matter
of.
Let's
just
put
this
on
the
list
or
certain
criteria
has
gonna
have
to
be
met
by
the
city
as
far
as
maintaining
I
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody's
clear
on
that.
So
we
have
a
good
three
direction
of
that
before
we
decide
to
put
some
fair.
P
Enough,
it
just
seems
like
we
that
kilm
industrial-
this
is
a
example
of
other
roadways.
Perhaps
that
didn't
get
properly
reviewed.
In
my
estimation,
then,
we
need
to
I
suppose
tasks.
If
we
can
impose,
can
do
that
task.
The
TRB
with
you
know,
looking
through
the
lens
of
a
port,
and
not
just
you
know
through
this
I,
don't
know
non-commercial
activity,
I,
don't
know
what
I
don't
know
what
lens
the
sharpies
looking
through,
but
it
seems
like
it
at
least
your
estimation.
P
D
We're
not
we're
not
Dallas
where
you
just
trucks
are
passing
through
and
you
know
how
to
what
makes
it
easier
to
get
this
truck
from
point
A
to
point
B
is
you
know
we
have
the
destination
points
and
the
warehouses
are
definitely
one
of
them
so,
but
for
us
I
guess
it's
just.
How
do
we
get
this
and
the
best
light
for
us
to
be
presenting
on
the
national
scale
and
does
it
if
it
took
more
roads?
D
P
P
C
C
N
Mcpherson
is
on
the
NHS.
It
was
added
during
map-21,
it's
a
principal
arterial.
It
needs
to
connect
to
another
NHS,
and
so,
if
you
take
it
all
the
way
past
loop,
20
right
there,
it's
no
longer
connect
ending
at
another
NHS.
It
ends
into
just
another
minor
roadway.
You
would
need
to
bring
it
back
to
end
of
NHS
to
get
rid
of
the
stub.
D
D
That
that's
exactly
it
goes
right
into
it.
I
was
in
port,
but
it
goes
into
an
industrial
park
where
all
those
trucks
are
coming
out
and
and
so
what
is
what
is
the
cost
or
benefit,
because
the
city
of
Laredo
has
to
maintain
that
Street
to
a
truck
standard
level
right
mm-hm,
so
is
there
any
benefit
that
get
it
gained
by
putting
it
on
this
map?
I,
don't
know,
that's
my
question.
D
D
D
C
G
A
P
They're
they're
already
imposed
as
as
it
is,
and
I
don't
know.
This
is
I
mean
I
haven't
seen
the
CFR
I
haven't
seen
the
statute.
Omens
presented
anything
meaningful
as
to
what
all
the
requirements
are.
Oh,
it
just
seems
that
if
we
have
options
and
available
funding
that
we
should,
you
know
not
tie
our
hands,
I
mean.
I
P
A
P
It
would
be
nice
to
have
some
sort
of
in
intelligent
discussion
as
to
what
all
does
this
really
mean
if
I
think
what
you're
saying,
if
what
you're
saying
is
true
and
and
it's
and
it's
a
selling
point
I
mean
missioner
galo
is
correct,
I
mean:
do
we
really
want
to
bury
ourselves
and
more
red
tape
under
the
false
hope
that
magically
you
know,
TxDOT
is
going
to
bury
the
city
and
money
so
that
we
can
get
the
port
up
to
speed.
You
know,
then
we
don't
want
to
do
that.
C
P
C
C
I
N
Have
a
deadline
to
submit
recommendations
in
June
for
a
first-round
review
to
FHWA
and
then
provide
us.
Some
comments
will
coordinate
with
Melissa
if
there's
any
Arab,
sorry
with
Vanessa.
If
there's
any
changes
and
if
not,
then
we'll
just
take
it
on
to
the
headquarters,
if
it
should
be
way,
they're
the
ones
that
approve
any
changes
to
the
NHS
so.
P
A
A
Q
A
H
H
First
I
wanted
to
show
the
the
crash
straight
for
the
whole
world
is
nope.
This
is
from
where
other
angel
starts,
but,
as
you
come
over,
the
359
bridge
all
the
way
to
Montana
hi.
Okay,
so,
as
you
can
see,
even
though
the
vehicles
miles
traveled
are
increasing
every
year
the
crash
rate
has
gone
down
because
the
the
toll
crashes
are
pretty
stable.
There's
a
lot
more
vehicles
travel,
but
the
crashes
are
staying
pretty
stable,
so
the
crash
rate
goes
down
for
those
that
want.
You
want
to
see
what
their
crash
is
calculated.
H
A
P
D
D
H
H
H
Divided
the
numbers
into
two
different
sections:
first
of
all,
both
Orientals
opened
approximately
two
thousand
twelve,
then
Mercer
I
got
and
then
in
December.
At
the
end
of
that
year
we
closed
off
the
intersections.
We
were
having
those
fatalities,
and
that
was
about
the
end
of
the
year.
2015
on
we've
been
functioning
with
those
just
the
turnarounds.
No,
no,
no
traffic
signals
no
stop
signs
at
the
intersections
and
that
the
numbers
reflect
that
before
and
after
kind
of
okay.
So
before
we
close
off
the
intersections,
we
had
a
total
of
62
accidents.
H
Okay,
39
we're
in
the
day
14
we're
dark,
but
if
they
happened
in
locations
where
have
safety,
lighting
and
nine
happen
locations
where
there
wasn't
safety
light?
These
are.
These
are
the
numbers
of
the
crashes
that
we've
had
since
we
closed
off
the
intersections
we've
had
total
of
134
66
were
in
the
daylight
37,
where
it
was
dark,
but
it
was.
There
were
safety
lighting
and
there
was
31
where
it
was
no
lightning.
At
all.
Sorry,.
H
D
M
H
H
H
H
Now
these
here
I'm
going
to
show
you
the
next
few
slides
all
relate
after
we
close
up
the
intersection
that
relates
to
these
1534
accidents.
Here,
okay,
since
January
15,
this
is
a
manner
of
collision.
You
know
it's
what
the
vehicles
were
doing
it
with
when
they
light
when
the
crash
happened,
if
you'll
notice,
the
third
or
line
down
most
of
the
accidents
are
happening
because
it's
one
vehicle
going
straight.
The
book,
local,
the
accident.
M
H
H
H
H
P
P
H
D
H
J
H
H
So
these
are
contributing
factors
and
it
was
what
the
person
was
doing
when
the
crash
happened.
We,
where
we
saw
they,
it's
accidents
going
one
direction.
One
person
failed
to
control,
speed
and
failure.
You
the
rather
way
these
are.
These
are
the
contributing
factors
before
we
close
up
that
you
know
have.
H
M
H
H
D
J
D
G
D
H
L
I,
just
I'm
I'm
confused
as
to
how
we
went
up
with
accidents
even
per
capita
I
know
it's
gone
down
boy.
You
just
look
at
the
total
number.
When
you
close
the
intersections,
it
seems
to
be
something
happen.
Is
it
that
people
are
trying
to
cut
across?
Is
that
people
trying
to
u-turn
illegally
I
know
most
of
the
accidents
are
going
straight,
but
I
mean
they're
not
going
to
tell
you
what's
really
happening
right
there,
they're
gonna,
say
I
veered
off
the
road,
not
I.
I
was
gonna.
P
H
I
understand
your
question
is,
but
we
still
we
install
safety
improvements
on
probably
prior
to
the
accidents
happening.
The
streets
just
dead
end
it
into
okay.
At
the
time,
cars
are
going
30
miles
an
hour
you're
coming
out
of
Halawa.
When
you
have
it
one
of
those
streets,
gonna
turn
into
traffic
at
5
10
miles
an
hour.
H
H
Some
discretion
know
if
he
comes
out
on
the
other,
and
he
wants
to
make
the
u-turn
about,
though
most
asougi's
it's
up
to
him
to
determine
I
can
make
it
in
that
short
distance
or
I
may
need
to
go
to
the
next
one,
because
the
turnaround
is
there
doesn't
mean
he's
entitled
to
be
it.
If
the
traffic
is
that
heavy,
you
may
need
to
go
down.
D
Do
you
don't
keep
any
statistics
about
whether
they're
locals
are
not
from
that
area,
because
you
know
I
mentioned
it
before
I
find
it
very
unsettling,
not
be
somebody
that
drives
that?
Well,
very
often
it
it
has
a
weird
feel
to
it
and
I
can't
tell
you
why
well
I'd
rather
know
a
lot
and
what
I'm
saying
so
so
you're
accustomed
to
it.
Just
you
know,
yeah
my.
J
J
G
Big
signs,
you
know
I
I,
think
in
general,
with
mr.
McGee.
You
did
an
excellent
job
of
presenting
that
up
there
and
traffic
by
means.
I'm,
not
a
traffic
engineer,
but
always
trying
to
establish
traffic
patterns
is
a
very
tricky
situation
and
if
I
look
at
that
situation,
where
we
had
the
fatalities
and
we
eliminated
the
cross
movements
as
people
get
familiar
with
it
and
to
answer
the
Commissioner
gay
knows
Tommy
you're,
absolutely
right,
you
know
driving
down
the
loop
20
we're
terribly
popular.
It
feels
a
lot
different
than
the
rule
area
like
this.
G
That's
not
populated,
yet
the
lighting
and
the
businesses
aren't
there,
but
if
you're,
driving
and
you're
seeing
increase
of
the
speed,
my
my
assumption
would
be
that
you've
eliminated
the
intersection
turns
people
get
on
there
and
it's
an
open,
freeway,
hey.
Let
me
speed
up,
there's
nobody
coming
across,
so
we
eliminated
one
situation
and
possibly
created
another,
but
certainly
the
when
it
comes
down
to.
If
the
city
is
willing
to
do
a
continuous
lighting
project,
we're
up
for
that
solution
again,
the
funny
would
come
directly
from
the
city
correct.
J
J
D
L
Right
I'm
gonna
echo
what
you
said,
sir,
with
all
due
respect,
I,
understand
that
we're
trying
to
eliminate
problems.
I
know
you
guys
are
trying,
but
the
truth
is
we're
having
traffic
that's
going
straight,
all
by
themselves.
That's
making
erroneous
decisions
and
it's
got
to
be
signage
of
some
kind.
Well,
that's.
H
That's
my
point
is
that
we
were
asked
to
look
at
to
see
if
the
illumination
was
a
sort
of
the
solution.
What
I'm
trying
to
show
here
is
that
we're
having
those
vehicle
run
off
the
road
accidents
all
times
a
day,
whether
it's
daylight,
dark
and
lit,
or
not.
So
there
are
solutions,
I'm,
not
saying
we're,
not
going
to
look
at
these
solutions,
but
at
the
illumination
it
wouldn't
be
the
number
one
solution
to
this
image.
We're
gonna
eliminate
the
least
amount
of
accidents,
yet
they
really
have
Brunton
on
those
numbers
very
good.
H
H
H
E
H
K
H
H
D
J
You're,
correct
I
think
it's
gonna
be
several
able
to
help
the
situation.
We're
not
gonna,
say
it's
gonna
fix
the
problem
entirely,
but
at
least,
if
we
help
out
in
contributing
to
these
factors
in
helping
these
situations,
you
know
somebody
falling
asleep
in
the
wheel.
If
we
have
those
safety,
you
know
whatever
they're
called
it's
gonna
help.
You
know
we
have
lighting,
it's
gonna,
definitely
help
so
I.
Think
it's
a
it's
a
combination
of
things
that
we
have
to
consider
as
an
MPO,
and
hopefully
the
city
as
well,
and.
H
L
Know
nobody
talking
about
at
no
more
patrols
out
there
yeah
you're
right?
No,
we
have
talked
about
that
and
we
talked
about
that
at
City,
Council,
quite
a
bit
having
patrols,
but
at
night
your
failure
to
control
speed
is
Augmon
by
darkness.
You
cannot
see.
What's
coming
up
ahead,
could
be
a
deer
could
be
anything
you
don't
see
it.
So,
even
though
it's
it's
one
component
I
think
it's
a
necessary
as.
H
H
J
H
H
J
Is
it
safe
to
say
that,
of
course
you
know
the
city
has
to
play
a
big
part
of
this.
In
my
opinion,
you'll
also
get
some
positive.
Whatever
we've
done
and
I
don't
text
and
David
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
or
if
you
agree
or
don't
agree,
I
believe
that
there's
a
lot
of
factors
that
contribute
to
everything
that
would
just
sit
here.
I
know
traffic
light
is
the
last
thing
we
want
to
see.
When
you
have
a
you
know
major.
You
know
loop
like
that.
J
You
know
you
don't
want
to
be
disrupted
and
you
want
to
get
to
where
you
want
to
go,
but
safety
obviously
plays
a
key.
You
know.
Obviously,
long-term
decisions
can
be
over
passes.
You
know
without
a
doubt,
but
in
the
meantime,
and
if
that
project
does
go
through,
we,
the
real
diamond
of
warm
June
Lomas
having
one
traffic
signal
out,
there
will
actually
help
and
reduce
the
speed
on
both
ends.
There's
going
to
be
a
median
there's
going
to.
E
L
H
Actually,
there
is,
if
you
can,
you
picture
the
intersection
of
my
gonna
Hein
and
us
eighty-three
mm-hmm
I
walk
back.
We
had
a
couple
of
fatalities
out
there
correct
and
the
city
wanted
to
put
Travis
Neil
out
there.
We
put
the
barriers
right,
we
made
us
well,
you
can
only
turn
left
coming
up.
Good
I
was
very
adamant
about
not
putting
Travis
Eman
there
because
it
says
location
where
you
don't
expect
the
traffic
signal.
Can
you
imagine
you
stopping
at
a
red
light
someone's
coming
down
the
road
and
we've
had
them
happen
for
the
18-wheeler.
H
Looking
at
his
phone
looking
this
computer
login
go
into
the
back
in
you.
It's
all
about
driver
expectation,
same
thing
on
the
loop
right
now:
everybody's
eye,
driving
the
worrisome
test.
65
I
get
past
like
I'm,
saying
still
75
80
miles
an
hour.
So
can
you
imagine
that
we
stalk
people
at
an
intersection?
Somebody,
that's
not
paying
attention.
Everyone's
got
cell
phones,
these
days,
they're
gonna
plow
into
somebody.
G
G
We
have
some
access
or
after
we
put
the
tribe
same
way
there
you
want
to
turn
around
I
mean
we
were
certainly
look
at
that
once
once
was
in
it,
we
listen,
evaluate
the
tracks
of
it's
gonna
warrant
it
or
not.
They
don't
have
to
go
through
the
warrant
study.
We're
not
going
to
eliminate
that
and
we'll
certainly
look
at
any
other
issues
that
we
can
do
out
there.
Whether
it's
signing
rumble
strips
illumination.
We
will
be
looking
at
that,
but
I
guess
the
basis
of
the
presentation
that
mr.
H
Patrol
the
message
I
want
to
say
today
is
not
that
I'm
say
we
don't
do
anything,
there's
accidents
happening.
Obviously
we
wanna
do
something
about
it.
We
just
need
to
look
to
see
where
the
best
bang
for
our
buck
is
or
which
ones
we
do.
First
mystery
man,
we
can
look
at
the
Roman
scripts.
People
run
out.
The
rule
list
off
people
running
illumination
is
where
the
city
wants
to
do
and
they
want
to
participate
financially.
We
look
very.
F
F
H
F
H
F
K
We
had
a
assistant
county
engineer
as
just
a
follow-up
on
April
the
10th.
We
had
a
stakeholders
meeting
with
the
city,
the
county
representatives
of
the
landowners
regarding
the
ruthenberg
project.
We
determined
a
preferred
alignment
for
the
roadway
on
that
area
and
we
also
did
right
of
entry
forms
to
get
environment
so
there's
to
go
to
work
inside
your
property.
So
basically
that's
what
we
did
and
that's
where
we
are
so
far
on
that
project.
What's.
F
K
K
F
Q
Robert
Rodriguez.
We
takes
that
good
afternoon.
On
the
latter.
Look
we
recently
had
a
meeting
with
a
consultant
Jacobs.
We
are
developing
the
design
criteria
which
which
pretty
much
have
you
know
we're
pulling
the
divided
and
then
eventually
we'll
bring
it
up
to
a
freeway.
We're
gonna
have
utility
workshop.
We're
contacting
the
utility
companies
along
the
area,
see
what
kind
of
updated
information
they
have
under
existing
utilities.
We
can
work
around
them.
Q
This
also
mean
is
gonna,
be
scheduled
with
kcs
with
a
robo
company
so
that
we
can
look
at
their
plans
and
what
is
that?
Their
proposed
development
and
around
the
loop
and
we're
gonna
have
we're
working
right
now
they
started
developing
that
the
constraints
map
of
the
entire
corridor
see
what
kind
of
constraints
we
have
within
the
the
present
very.
F
S
This
for
the
record,
I
know
we
shorten
time.
The
projects
itself
is
the
moon
forward.
The
Kansas
City,
the
one
next
to
the
office,
is
still
it's.
96
percent
complete
we're
having
issues
with
the
illumination
moving
forward
with
illumination,
and
that
will
bring
closure
to
were
looking
at
more
of
a
with
June
2019.
The
next
one
I
want
to
talk
about
is
the
SNR
project.
This
135
and
live.
E
S
S
We
basically
I
know
we're.
Already
in
April,
we've
been
having
both
different
weather
patterns,
should
one
say
which
is
not
lending
itself
to
sealcoat,
but
where
we're
having
the
plans
are
to
get
it
completed
through
the
Silk
Road
the
striping
and
get
it
completed
by
May
this
year
and
that's
a
2.9
investment
2.9
million
another
one
I
want
to
talk
about
is
359
project.
S
A
359
project
is
a
four
point,
eight
miles
from
low
20
East,
all
the
way
up
to
the
county
line
that
one
we
basically
got
to
the
Border
Patrol
checkpoint
and
beyond,
and
we
should
be
making
the
turn
back
on
doing
the
spot
base
repairs.
Once
we
complete
all
this
putt
base
repairs
and
get
back
to
the
four
point
eight
miles,
then
we'll
start
the
overlay.
S
C
The
army
with
us
today
they
ask
that
I
report.
They
report
that
on
my
SEO
Road
project,
that
after
coordination
with
text
debt
finance,
Dept,
the
Army's
moved
forward
with
submitting
the
draft
interlocal
agreement
in
the
city
of
marito,
the
army
will
also
be
submitting
the
draft
agreement
to
the
kiln
company.
Both
draft
agreements
are
proposed
to
be
released
in
the
next
two
weeks.
Meantime,
the
army
will
work
with
their
JC
to
authorize
a
work.
Authorization
for
the
passed
through
finance
application
on
los
pacientes
are
from
cuatro
Vientos
to
Concord
Hills.
C
They
report
that
they're
distributing
the
interlocal
agreement
to
this
city
of
Marino
on
4:16
Industrial
Boulevard
turn
lanes
again
distributing
an
interlocal
agreement
to
city
Lariat,
a
whole
salon
for
16
April
16th
North,
Florida,
Webb,
County,
Transportation
Planning.
Studying
the
advanced
funding
agreement
is
executed.
The
FHFA
funding
authorization
letter
has
been
received
text
not
to
provide
an
eb8
goal
for
the
RMA
to
meet
and
anticipate
execution
of
the
work
authorization
in
the
next
two
weeks.
The.