►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 091621
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 091621
A
A
A
A
We
have
citizen
comments,
I
believe
we're
gonna
have
citizen
comments,
but
it's
gonna
be
specific
to
the
items.
D
Beginning
owner
is
mr
pedro:
property
is
described
as
lot
105
block
9
lorry
farm
unit,
2
located
at
140
biscayne
loop.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
our
one
single
residential
single
family,
residential
district
to
a
b4
highway
commercial
district
that
proposed
used
as
poll
rental
categorized.
As
an
outdoor
amusement
service.
D
D
Staff
does
not
support
the
proposed
zone
change.
The
proposed
zone
change
does
not
conform
with
the
comprehensive
plans.
Designation,
designation
for
this
area
as
low
density
residential
the
site
does
not
meet
the
before
location
requirements
that
said,
type
type
uses
be
located
along
principal
arterials
or
expressways.
D
Biscayne
loop
is
not
identified
on
the
long-range
thoroughfare
plan.
The
property
does
not
meet
the
minimum
lot
size
requirements
of
10
000
square
feet,
as
identified
in
section
24.63,
permitted
land
uses
and
section
24,
24-77.1
dimensional
standards
of
the
land
development
code.
The
property
is
6
600
square
feet
as
identified
in
the
web
county
appraisal
district
records.
The
proposed
zone
change
will
all
allow
users
incompatible
with
those
currently
existing
in
the
surrounding
areas
and
the
proposed
motion.
A
A
F
Hi
for
the
record,
anna
sophia,
garcia
with
the
city
attorney's
office,
I'm
the
interim
city
attorney
and
we
as
a
city
oppose
this
change,
because
this
is
for
a
public
pool
and
all
public
and
semi-public
polls
need
permits
through
the
health
department,
and
this
public
or
semi-public
poll
would
not
qualify
under
that
permit.
F
F
E
A
No
anybody
against
it
go
ahead.
I
My
name
is:
leslie
young,
I'm
a
resident
at
119,
this
game
group,
where
I've
been
a
homeowner
since
january
1988.
our
little
loop.
Our
little
block
consists
of
family
members
and
families
of
neighbors
that
have
become
families.
We've
watched
our
children
grow
and
be
together
for
many
many
years.
I'm
very
relieved
to
hear
all
the
information
that
you
all
have
against
this.
We
are
a
neighborhood.
This
is
not
a
business.
I
E
J
My
name
is
cynthia
salinas
and
I
live
at
140
biscay,
which
is
right
across
the
street
from
this
property
and
the
main
issue
we've
been
there
like
miss
young,
said:
we've
been
over
been
there
since
I've
been
there
since
1987,
which
is
34
years
in
that
area,
most
of
the
neighbors
there
have
been
there
for
more
than
30
years.
We
all
know
each
other.
We
know
our
kids,
we
became
grandparents,
we've
been
retired,
we're
all
doing
everything.
J
At
the
same
time,
it's
been,
it's
always
been
a
quiet,
neighborhood,
very
good
neighborhood
and
I'm
very
much
against
this
becoming
a
commercial
property.
Since
I'm
across
the
street,
I
get
bombarded
with
all
the
cars
in
front
of
my
lawn.
Sometimes
I
have
to
pick
up
trash
when
they
leave.
I
have
all
these
people
coming
in
that
I
don't
know,
and
his
residence
only
probably
fits
maybe
three
or
four
cars.
So
all
the
other
ones
go
all
around
the
loop.
J
So
that's
the
safety
issue.
If
any
emergency
units
need
to
go
in,
they
cannot
because
it
is
blocked,
like
the
character
of
our
neighborhood,
will
change,
because
it's
always
been
a
quiet
neighborhood
and
we
need
to
preserve
our
privacy.
Also,
the
value
of
our
home
will
most
probably
depreciate.
Due
to
this,
nobody
wants
to
live
in
a
commercial
area
also
our
resident.
When
I
signed
the
deed
in
1987,
it
said
that
I'm
going
to
buy
a
home
in
a
residential
area
and
not
in
a
commercial
area.
J
J
If
it
becomes
commercial.
The
time
we
don't
have
any
the
residents.
If
it
is
commercial,
we
don't
have
any
say
so
or
control
over
the
ending
time
of
any
of
these
functions,
the
lighting
there
is
only
one
light,
so
the
lighting
is
not
very
good.
There's
no
handicapped
parking,
which
was
a
does,
require
that
and
of
course,
the
noise,
and
we
also
don't
have
any.
We
would
not
have
any
control
of
the
occupancy.
How
many
people
will
attend?
J
J
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Is
there
anything
that
that
you
want
to
add
to
that?
I
think
it's
pretty
clear
that
that
the
group
is
supposing
and
the
the
reason
of
the
similar
original
investigation
they've
got
good
cause
to
oppose
it.
So
if
there's
anything
else
that
we
might
add
to
those
comments.
B
Then
I
will
go
ahead
and
analyze
accommodations.
C
Time,
mr
chairman,
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment.
Okay,
I
know
that
this
is
controversial
for
for
some
of
you
and
it's
upsetting,
but
there
is
a
process.
G
D
Owner
is
maria
miguela
and
applicant
representative
from
liz.
Miguela
is
mr
ricardo
lopez.
This
property
is
described
as
slot
7
block
873,
a
dia
del
rio
subdivision
located
at
2402
burnside
street.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
our
three
mixed
residential
district
to
our
two
multifamily
residential
district.
The
proposed
use
is
for
condominiums.
D
D
Future
line
is
map
f
supports
the
purple
zone
change.
The
proposal
and
change
conforms
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
which
kind
of
identifies
this
area
as
a
high
density
residential.
The
property
meets
the
dimensional
requirements
for
arch
and
zone
lots,
as
required
by
the
rate
by
laredo
land
development
code,
section
24.77,
dimensional
standards.
D
Yes,
they
just
need
to
change
the
zone,
for
I
guess
the
applicant
wants
to
sell
one
of
the
units.
D
L
E
M
And
I
would
like
to
answer
your
question.
Yes,
there
is
a
driver
on
each
side
of
the
property
and
on
unit
two
on
the
right
side,
and
you
need
one
on
the
left
side.
Okay
and
there
is
more
parking
if
we
decided
basically
to
use
an
rpe
or
something
else.
M
The
only
reason
why
we
decided
basically
to
sell
this
property
is
because
my
mother
is
right
now
90
years
old
and
we
start
basically
selling
all
the
properties
we
want
to
keep
one
of
the
units,
but
in
order
to
keep
one
of
the
units.
E
G
E
D
Owner
is
mr
edwin
agassen,
mr
orlando
is
the
applicant
and
representative
for
mr
edwin.
Garcon
property
is
described
as
lots.
One
and
three
block
273
western
division
located
at
1504
santa
maria
zone.
Church
request
is
from
b1
limited
business
district
to
b4,
highway
commercial
district.
The
proposed
use
is
from
is
for
swimming
swimming
pool,
splash
pad
outdoor
amusement
service.
D
And
as
we
can
see,
or
you
can
see
that
one
right
now
is
currently
going
to
be
one
and
all
surrounding
areas
is
residential.
C
D
Does
not
support
the
proposed
zone
change
this
site
does
not
conform
to
a
comprehensive,
planned
neighborhood
mixed
use.
Net
designation,
which
does
not
include
before
designation
the
property,
does
not
meet
the
land
development
code,
location
requirements,
stipulating
that
before
districts
should
be
located
along
major
arterials
or
freeways.
Santa
maria
is
identified
as
a
major
collector.
O
O
C
O
A
A
G
C
A
G
G
C
Very
similar
to
what
we
just
rejected
in
the
other
one,
I'm
very
familiar
with
his
neighborhood
and
I
used
to
live
a
block
and
a
half
away.
There
was
a
beautiful
house
right
there
before
they
put
that
the
ugly
looking
thing
that
we
just
saw-
and
I
I
I
still
know
some
of
the
families
that
live
in
that
area
and
they're
they're
poor
people.
That's
probably
why
they're
not
here
tonight
to
object
to
it,
but
I
certainly
think
it's
totally
inappropriate
to
suggest
that
a
b4
would
be
put
there.
C
K
I
G
Typically,
we
would
show
the
list.
You
know
our
list
is
pretty
easy
to
read
and
we
and
we
can
present
that
to
them.
Sometimes
people
see
b1
and
then
you
know
well,
b3
is
three
is
higher
than
one,
so
I
want
to
go
with
b3,
but
the
the
reasoning
is
is
the
type
of
business
in
the
area
you
want
somewhere
for
regional
coverage
somewhere
for
neighborhood
coverage.
So
that's
that's
how
we
do
it,
but
we
do
show
them
the
scale
of
the
different,
the
different
businesses
that
you
can
put.
I
C
C
C
G
O
O
A
One
of
the
biggest
issues
going.
B
B
G
G
D
Owner
and
the
applicant
or
representative
is
mr
alfredo
property
is
described
as
block
7,
the
north
laredo
land
irrigation
and
water
company
plant
located
1600
island
street.
I'm
sorry,
the
zone
change
request
is
from
an
ag.
Agriculture
district
to
la
to
m1
light
manufacturing
district
proposed
use
is
industrial.
D
Supports
the
proposal
change,
although
not
in
conformance
with
the
comprehensive
plan's
designation
as
agricultural
rule,
the
area
is
predominantly
characterized
by
light
industrial
uses
the
site
compliance
with
complies
with
the
m1
sony,
dimensional
requirements.
As
for
laredo
land
development
code,
section
2477,
dimensional
standards.
Q
G
E
E
K
G
D
Staff
supports
a
purple
zone
change,
even
though
the
proposed
zone
change
is
not,
in
conformance
with
the
future
la
nice
map
of
the
comprehensive
plan
designation
for
the
area
as
neighborhood
mix
used
excluding
before
zoning
district,
the
property
complies
with
the
before
zoning
requirements.
As
per
section
24,
77
dimension
standards,
the
proposed
use
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
commercial
uses
in
the
area.
D
G
Mr
chairman,
members
of
the
commission,
danny
harina,
for
the
record,
I
am
helping
the
property
owner
process
the
zoning
change
and
I
am
in
favor
of
all
the
staff's
comments
and
the
recommendation
and
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions.
Okay,
any
questions
from
mr
hirino.
C
C
Mr
chairman,
before
you
start,
I
want
to
recuse
myself
because
I'm
a
member
of
a
non-profit
housing
corporation
that
is
within
300
feet
of
this
location
and
any
b4
use,
would
be
adverse
to
the
160
units
that
we
recently
financed
for
over
five
million
dollars.
Okay
and
I'd
rather
not
take
part
in
the
discussion,
but
but
I
am
as
a
representative
of
that
property
and
I'm
against
those
unchecked
all
right.
Thank
you.
So
much
all
right.
D
Hardin
company
development
lp
is
the
owner.
Daniel
junior
representative.
This
property
is
described
as
law.
One
block
two
clarks
crossing
subdivision
phase
2
located
at
3
3501
park
boulevard
zone
change
request
is
from
big
three
community
business
district
to
be
for
a
highway
commercial
district.
The
proposed
uses
commercial.
D
That
does
not
support
the
proposed
zone
change
the
proposed
zone
change
is
not,
in
conformance
with
the
future
unused
pub.
I've
got
the
comprehensive
plan
designation
for
the
area
as
a
neighborhood
mixed
use.
The
proposed
youth
is
not
compatible
with
the
surrounding
high-density
residential
use
to
the
west
parks
crossing
apartments
complex,
nor
is
it
compatible
with
the
family,
community-oriented
use
of
the
city
of
laredo,
haines
health
and
wellness
center
to
the
south.
D
G
G
C
If
you
can,
your
presentation
is
a
video
presentation.
G
G
You
first
and
foremost
the
property
owner
hutton
development
is
a
major
retail
development
company
with
a
really
great
reputation.
They
have
developed
over
1300
real
estate
projects
in
40
states.
G
G
G
G
Are
these
in
my
professional
opinion,
as
a
city,
planner
are
critical?
Okay,
I
want
to
address
staff's
comment
that
the
b4
is
not
compatible
to
the
surrounding
land
uses.
G
G
G
They
sell
propane,
they
sell
co2,
they
have
an
open
load
and
it's
all,
it
almost
has
like
a
light
industrial
feel
to
it.
Okay,
the
rest.
H
G
Them
is
a
dollar
general,
so,
in
terms
of
the
of
the
compatibility
with
the
apartments,
I
measured
door-to-door
to
the
closest
building
to
our
sides,
and
we
are
right
over
600
feet
away.
Okay,
that
is
about
two
football
fields
and
to
put
into
perspective
if
you're,
if
you're,
looking
at
the
heb,
plus
and
you're
at
the
entrance
of
the
right,
it's
basically
from
that
door,
all
the
way
to
the
drive-through
at
that
starbucks
600
feet
now,
on
top
of
it
so
to
the
east
is
check
one
creek.
G
So
not
only
are
we
600
feet
away
from
those
apartments,
but
we
also
have
two
businesses
offering
our
site
from
those
apartments,
so
I
just
don't
see
how
commercial
is
not
compatible
in
an
area.
That's
primarily
commercial
number.
Five,
this
property
exceeds
all
of
the
dimensional
standards
set
forth
under
the
b4
zoning
district.
Okay.
G
G
A
A
Can
somebody
please
read
the
definition
of
the
b4
zoning
district?
For
me,
please.
G
District
high
commercial
district
is
to
provide
for
those
businesses
and
services
serving
a
regional
area
which
are
to
be
located
primarily
along
principal
major
arterial
streets
or
the
freeway
as
classified
in
the
transportation
path
of
simulator.
It
is
intended
for
this
learning
custody
to
exist
primarily
among
principal
arterial
streets
or
the
freeway,
to
impose
site
development
regulations
to
ensure
adequate
access
of
all
uses.
Within
this
classification.
G
G
G
G
G
G
So
my
client
signed
a
non-disclosure
with
a
tenant.
They
have
a
letter.
A
K
Okay,
because
what
we
see,
what
we
see
between
the
b1
and
the
b2
and
the
b4,
the
b4
is
open
for
bars
and
machinitas
and
that's
the
main
issue
around
okay.
So
that's
why
I'm
asking
that's
right?
What
what
would
be
that?
What
would
you
be
putting
there?
C
G
It
is
a
9,
000
square
foot,
shell
building
and
again
they
have
not
said.
E
G
G
Not
going
to
be
a
flea
market
they're
not
going
to
have
outdoor
storage,
I
can
tell
you
what
it's
what
it's
not
going
to
be,
but
I
haven't
been
privy
information
of
what
it's.
G
E
G
Or
write
it
right
out
and
so.
E
G
So
we
do
have
two
points
of
access
which
which
of
course
are
very
important.
Another
question
right
there's
a
question
for
staff
from
commissioner.
The
property
currently
sits
on
the
arterial
roadway.
Is
it
the
fact
that
it's
close
to
the
hane
center
and
the
apartments
is?
Is
that
what
it
is
or
what
is
the
actual
there's
several
if
well
the
businesses
that
he
talked
about
that
that
are
around
the
area?
G
All
those
businesses
are
b3s,
they're,
they're,
all
b3s,
so
they
didn't
need
to
be
for
it
to
get
those
businesses
there
and
they
service
the
the
regional
area
or
the
area
in
that
area.
You
know
that
is
that
the
nearest
b4
is
about
a
thousand
feet.
G
It's
it's
not
it's
not
near
just
like
it's
in
a
football
field
right
well,
this
is
three
football
players.
You
know
we're
over
there,
so
you
know
to
bring
a
b4
into
this
area.
The
intensity
of
what
he
can
bring,
plus,
what's
allowed
in
that
area,
becomes
very
difficult.
My
decision
on
this
is
more
around
the
the
area
that
we
have
there.
We
have
an
investment
of
a
children's
right
or
a
rec
center,
and
we
also.
B
Have
the
the
apartment
complex
in
the
area
we
haven't
seen
I
mean
I've
seen
success.
G
G
L
And
not
saying
that:
that's
what
your
client
is
intending
to
to
open,
but
besides
the
amusement
redemption
machine,
there's
scrap
and
waste
recycle
collection.
There
is
heavy
machinery
on
display.
There
is
empower
yard
and
there's
other
things
that,
even
if
that's
not
the
original
intent
a
client
leaves.
That
would
be
something
that
will
have
to
be
allowed
right
right
and
it's
like
so
close
to
the
recreation.
L
So
I
I
don't
feel
concerned
with
with
this
use.
Besides
the
point
that
it
will
really
be
spot
sodium,
you
know
there's
nothing
around.
There,
that'll
buzz
this
property,
that's
a
before,
so
it
will
be
spot
zoning,
we're
not
justified
to
approve
something
that
goes
against
a
comprehensive
plan,
there's
nothing
around
in
terms
of
zoning
or
uses
that
are
before
and
there's
a
lot
of
uses
that
would
be
effectively
and
negatively
affect
the
property.
In
my
opinion,
okay.
H
I
just
got
one
question
you
mentioned:
you
mentioned
the
traffic,
it
was
four
four
lanes
divided
and
how
much
did
it
could
it
cover
or
handle
the
traffic
you
mentioned.
G
N
N
N
N
N
G
G
B
G
G
The
next
item
is
the
amendment
of
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
of
oregon
by
rezoning
11.6
acres
at
a
53.3
record
trap
located
converted
to
l91
bc
properties
lcc,
as
described
in
that
public
record,
and
this
property
is
located
south
of
east
saunders,
street
and
west
of
bob
look
loop
from
b3
to
r1a
single
family
reduced
district.
This
is
it
all
right,
amanda.
D
Is
described
as
11.6
acres,
approximately
located
south
of
east
saunders,
street
and
west
of
wapulla,
the
zone
change
requires
from
a
v3
community
business
district
to
r1a
single
family,
reduced
area
district
to
a
highway
commercial
district
proposed
use
is
commercial.
The
applicant
has
not
identified
a
specific
proposed
use,
nine
letters
were
sent
out
and
we
have
not
received
anything
for
or
against.
E
D
Staff
supports
a
proposed
loan
change,
even
though
the
proposed
loan
change
is
not,
in
conformance
with
the
future
land,
use
stop
of
the
comprehensive
plan
designation
of
for
the
area
as
a
neighborhood
mixed
use,
excluding
before
zoning
district,
the
property
complies
with
the
b4
zoning
requirements.
As
for
section
24,
77
dimensional
standards,
the
proposed
use
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
commercial
uses
in
the
area.
D
Q
G
K
G
Those
against
motion
carries
next
item.
Remember.
Zoning
on
this
is
sitting
right
above
approximately
0.3
acres,
0.3
acres-
and
this
is
referred
to
as
the
edward
j
dryden
subdivision,
a
property
and
it
is
located.
D
Property
is
described
as
0.3
acres
located
at
3301
santa
clara
street.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
an
r1
single
family
residential
to
a
b3
community
business
district.
The
proposed
use
is
commercial
ice,
water,
vending
machine.
D
K
D
Does
not
support
the
proposed
zone
change
the
proposed
zone
change
is
not
in
conformance
with
the
future
land
use
of
the
comprehensive
plants.
Designation
of
this
area
is,
as
this
area
is
loaded
as
a
low
density
residential
that
does
not
include
p3
district.
The
proposed
commercial
ice
water
vending
machine
is
not
used
is
not
compatible
with
a
budding
residential
users
in
the
area.
G
E
I
R
G
C
R
R
R
If
you
can
see-
and
I'm
very
sorry
because
I'm
I
was
not
prepared
for
this-
it
was
just
at
the
last
minute
that
they
told
me
that
we
were
gonna
we
had
to
present.
We
just
want
to
invest
a
little
bit
of
money.
You
know
it's
it's
a
vending
machine.
I
don't
know
if
you've
seen
them
before.
You
know
it's
the
ice
machine
and
the
water
machine,
the
vending
machines,
there's
one
on
meadow
and-
and
we
haven't
seen
one
in
that
area.
R
So
we
would
like
to
like
you
know.
R
H
We're
gonna
put
a
fence
to
isolate
the
house
and.
G
G
C
Yeah
because
I
think
part
of
what
you
see
between
the
fence
and
the
street
actually
is
right
away
and
it's
not
their
property
and.
G
Your
vehicle
you
get
out
and
go
get
your
car
whichever
it
is,
and
then
you
drive
out.
Yes,
I
understand
so
yeah,
but
you
I
mean
from
what
I
see
in
the
drawing
you
know.
I
mean
you
only
have
parking
here,
probably
about
two
cars
or
three
in
the
way
you're
proposing
it.
Well,
it's
just
a
sketch
that
I
did
because,
like
I
said
we
can
move
it.
L
G
C
G
E
G
As
well,
I
guess
the
next
question
that
we
have
is
b1
b1,
you
know
being
in
the
residential
district.
You
know
once
again
we
get
into
the
idea
of
changing
the
zone
and
then
potentially
doing
something
else
in
that
zone.
E
G
Complete
zone
change
would
be
very
intense.
I
think
the
highest
I
mean
v3
is
a
very
high,
intense
use
and
a
conditional
use
permit,
because
it's
a
conditional
use
permit
is
a
permanent
that
if
it
is
approved,
it
is
specifically
just
to
do
this.
Yes
and
there's
conditions
that
go
away
that
need
to
be
discussed
with
a
with
a
planning
staff
in
terms
of
what
conditions
have
to
go
for
that
special
use.
Permit.
R
And
that's
what
they
had
told
me,
mr
inotosa,
I
spoke
to
mr
inauguration.
He
told
me
that
there
was
a
permit
that
they
could
give
me,
but
then
I
believe
he
got
moved
or
he
got
changed
to
another
position
or
something.
So
I
wasn't
able
to
speak
to
him
anymore.
They
directed
me
to
vanessa,
yes,
and
she
was
the
one
that
told
me
that
my
she
sent
me
an
email
and
she
said
that
I
that
my
application
was
incomplete.
So
we
had
we
had.
We.
R
We
can't
wait
we're
not
in
a
hurry.
We
want
to
do
things
right.
You
know
we
want
to
go
to
the
you
know.
We
want
to
do
things
right
so
then
she
said
you're
you're
not
supposed
to
come
here,
you're
supposed
to
go
first
to
the
building
department-
and
I
said
okay,
so
she
directed
me
to
the
building
department,
so
we're
almost
done
with
the
building
department.
We
submitted
an
application
as
well.
They
asked
me
for
the
meter,
location
and
the
water
meter,
location
and
the
waterfall
location.
G
G
G
F
D
G
L
G
L
Chairman,
just
for
the
record
on
the
permitted
uses
lunch
chart,
it
seems
like
they
would
need
to
be
one
there's
a
use
called
kiosk
to
provide
a
survey
yeah.
G
E
G
R
L
The
conditional
use
permit,
stipulation
or
the
submittal
criteria
it
does
say
that
when
they
are
zoned
r1,
they
can
only
seek
conditional
use
for
up
to
a
v1.
So.
G
G
E
G
G
E
G
All
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you!
So
much!
Yes,
all
right!
Next,
I
have
a
public
hearing
consideration
in
the
following
preliminary
flights:
preliminary
consideration
of
replay
of
loss,
22
west
33
feet
of
block
three
block;
936.
G
1A
and
2a
block
936
exposition
is
residential
right.
Yes,
mr
chairman,
the
applicant
is
maria
cadena.
I
joined
guerrero
engineer
of
record
is
getting
engineering
and
surveying
the
proposed
use
is
single
family
residential.
The
zoning
for
this
two
lot
development
is
r1
and
we
did
send
out
12
letters.
We
received
one
four
and
one
against
that's
right.
I'm.
G
Street
view,
as
you
can
see
by
the
photo
that
the
help
the
home
was
destroyed
in
a
fire,
so
actually
the
home
is
no
longer
there's
been
removed,
and
this
is
the
proposed
flat
going
from
three
lots
to
two.
C
G
G
S
E
H
G
K
G
P
G
Public
safety,
additional
comments
from
traffic
safety
and
the
proposed
motion:
well,
can
you
go
back
to
the
to
the
master
plan?
Yes,
sir,
all
right
now,
the
purpose
of
this
revision
is
to
configure
some
phases
and
streets.
Can
you
tell.
E
G
Up
here
and
the
initial
reconfiguration
of
this
street
actually
used
to
connect
to
kiln
industrial
and
it
no
longer
does
so
that's
one
of
the
comments
from
staff,
but
it's
a
reconfiguration
of
this
into
one
large
smartphone,
proposing.
C
G
P
We
concur
with
most
of
the
comments
right,
except
for
the
ones
one
and
two
from
the
traffic
department,
because
I
think
those
two
comments
should
be
addressed
as
a
at
the
building
permitting
a
process
instead
of
a
master
plan.
I
don't
think
those
comments
belong
to
a
master
plan,
application
order,
all
right.
P
Okay,
so
I
want
those
two
strikes
as
far
as
the
rest
we're
okay,
we
already
number
six,
who
already
met
with
the
planning
department
and
explained
why
the
the
changes,
and
also
we're
going
to
be
providing
a
a
connection
from
that
opportunity
that
you
were
a.
E
P
P
For
the
track,
okay
and
item
five,
we
don't-
I
don't
know
which,
on
traffic,
we
don't
understand
what
what
they're
trying
to.
Let
me
see
what's
wrong
with
it.
G
G
G
G
G
G
Lot
one
block
one
killer
industrial
park
unit:
21.
linton
is
industrial.
This,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
the
applicant
is
killing
development,
limited
kiln,
ranch
properties,
limited.
The
engineer
of
record
is
tech,
engineering
llc,
the
proposed
industrial
and
the
zoning
for
this
one
lot.
Development
is
m1
approximately
34
acres,
located
west
of
frontage,
road
and
north
of
kingdom.
Industrial
boulevard
aerial
view.
P
G
G
G
Preliminary
consideration
of
planet
carrier
dry
right
away.
Dedication
platform
is,
of
course,
dedication
right
away
for
the
record.
The
applicant
is
double
court
and
the
chartered
trust
engineer
record
is
called
snaps
engineering.
The
proposed
uses
dedication
of
way
and
the
zoning
for
this
development
is
m1
general
location,
3.26,
acres,
located
north
of
dorito
north
in
north
carolina
intersection
with
carrier,
drive
interstate
35
aerial
view
street
view.
G
G
G
Harvey
yes,
through
similarity
for
the
city
to
build
it
and
the
city
is
going
to
build
it,
the
city
to
build
it.
No,
no!
So
who
has
the
dedication
coming
right
now
then,
but
they
won't
apply
to
the
strip,
but
it
but
they'll
they'll
be
responsible
for
building
it,
not
the
city
parking
lot.
Okay,
that
makes
sense
this
there's
some.
They.
G
G
The
alignment
should
stay,
what
they're,
what
they
were
talking
to
us
about
is
they
didn't
want
to
put
any
more
stress
on
the
bridge,
yeah,
okay,
so
what
they
were
talking
about
is
a
right
and
right
out
situation
right
there.
So,
if
the,
if
trucks
were
going
to
come
out,
they
would
go
right,
go
south.
Take.
G
To
try
to
eliminate
any
more
traffic
born
on
carrier
bridge
because
of
the
the
traffic
on
the
east,
coming
it's
very
it's
packed
with
cars.
So
we're
looking
on
trying
to
do
that,
so
the
the
connection
is
still
there,
but
not
for
a
crossover
I
get
it.
I
just
don't
understand
why
we're
accepting
a
dedication
that
was
just
right
away
right
now
without
the.
G
G
G
G
G
G
P
G
Q
G
Concur
with
the
50
feet
as
well.
In
addition
to
what's
existing,
no,
no
well
he's
identifying
that
it's
50.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it
is
the
50.
that,
if
there's
anything,
that's
being
left
out,
he
needs
to
prove
that
that
it
will
be
included.
So
it's
we're
50
foot
wide
on
that
street.
Okay,.
E
G
G
G
G
I
mean
it's
preliminary,
so
he's
gonna
have
to
come
back
with
the
actual
measurements
of
what
the
right-of-way
dedication
is.
I
can
see
the
long-term
clearly
what
he's
doing,
but
he
still
needs
to
figure
out
how
much
he
needs
to
give
okay.
Does
anybody
have
any
questions
on
that?
No
all
right,
let
me
wish
for
the
commission
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
something
to
the
comments
for
the
second,
always
in
favor.
All
right
against
motion
carries
all
right.
G
The
next
one
is
preliminary
consideration
of
planet
episode
unit,
six,
the
intense
commercial
business
chairman
for
the
record.
The
applicant
is
als
florida
holdings
llc,
the
engineer
of
records,
dirksen
engineering,
kenneth,
r,
darkson
ge,
the
proposed
use
is
commercial
and
the
zoning
for
this
one
lot.
Development
is
v1
1.0
acres,
located
north
of
lomazel
boulevard
on
east
vegeta,
avenue
eastern
aerial
view,
street
view.
G
H
H
G
G
G
Thank
you
all
very
much
anything
else,
mr
chair
director,
no
sure.