►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 080422
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 080422
A
A
Do
know
that
mr
varun
is
running
a
few
minutes
late
and
mr
google
will
no
longer
be
on
the
commission
just
so
that
you
know.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
A
All
right,
the
next
item
that
we
have
is
the
we
do
have
a
quorum
server
pledge
of
allegiance.
If
everybody
could
please
stand
up.
A
Moving
right
into
item
number
five:
five,
a
is
amending
the
zoning
orders
in
the
city
directed
by
rezoning,
approximately
6.31
acres.
This
is
located
at
one
thousand
east
hillside
road
from
b4
to
b3.
All
right
who
will
make
the
presentation.
E
E
You,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record:
we
have
an
applicant
enrique
rosa
maria
benavidez
and
edward
garza
engineer.
The
representative.
We
have
property
description,
approximately
6.31
acres
located
at
a
thousand
east
hillside
road.
The
zone
changes
from
a
b4
to
a
b3
proposed
use
is
multi-family
apartments.
A
H
Good
evening,
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
planning
and
zoning
commission,
my
name
is
jed
brown
with
the
brownstone
group.
We
are
the
developer
for
this
property.
This
is
a
development
of
apartments
that
is
part
of
the
nine
percent
tax
credit
program.
We
have
a.
We
were
here
approximately
four
weeks
ago
with
a
support
resolution
that
we
presented
before
you
all
when
we
were
in
for
our
preliminary
plat.
The
development
was
unanimously
supported
by
all
nine
members,
the
mayor
and
all
eight
members
of
of
city
council
back
in
november.
H
I'm
pleased
to
report
that
last
thursday,
this
property
was
awarded.
Tax
credits
by
tdhca
came
in
first
place
in
the
region.
Second
place
was
the
other
tax
credit
property
that
it
has
already
come
before.
You
offer
a
change
of
zone
and
receive
their
change
of
zone.
We're
here
this
evening,
seeking
your
support
in
that
change
of
zone
and
to
proceed
I'll
proceed
on
to
city
council
in
a
few
weeks.
I
would
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
If
you
have
how
many
units
are
you
proposing
more
or.
A
I
A
In
november
I
just
have,
I
just
have
one
question:
hillside,
it's
the
tuna
road.
We
have
a
120
units
coming
in.
Is
there
like?
Are
you
all
proposing
to
write
in
right
out
for
this
project
there's
actually
or
how
are
you
going
to
control
traffic
there,
because
it's
already
pretty
congested
right.
I
Currently,
we
have
reviewed
the
existing
traffic
counts
in
that
area.
The
good
news
is
that
the
current
route
away
and
the
current
street
configurations
can
support
additional
traffic.
I
That's
the
good
news,
but
in
the
in
the
plat,
what
we're
proposing
there
is
a
right-of-way
dedication
component
included
to
widen
the
road
there's
also
when
this
development
was
first
developed
by
dean,
sanderson
back
in
the
day,
he
had
several
tracks
of
land
in
that
area
and
and
he
developed
a
back
road
system,
but
the
property
line
on
our
particular
plat
does
not
connect
to
that
road
system,
so
yeah,
so
we're
trying
to
look
into
that
as
a
possibility,
but
we're
designed
currently.
I
So
that's
what
we're
looking
at,
but
you
know
we,
it
wasn't
quite
set
up
perfect
just
for
that
to
be,
but
and
on
the
south
side
we
have
we're
confined
with
a
drainage
channel
and
a
sewer
easement.
So
we
don't
have
the
weight
from
the
south,
but
we
do
have.
The
side
plan
does
allow
for
secondary
access
for
the
fire
department
as
well
as
as
as
needed,
and
so
all
that's
already
in
the
site
plan.
And
it's
just
a
matter
now
of
working
through
the
traffic
circulation
with
the
traffic
department.
A
I
I
would
urge
the
city
of
laredo
staff,
the
intersection
of
springfield
and
hillside,
that
you
all
work
diligently
in
acquiring
a
right-handed
turn
lane,
because,
as
these
people
come
in,
they
need
to
take
kids
to
school
and
the
school
is
up
on
canada.
By
doing
this,
that
would
really
alleviate
the
flow
of
traffic.
A
You
know
it
would
make
it
really
move
the
other
way.
We
only
have
one
lane
if
you're
going
westbound
and
you're
going
to
make
a
right
on
hillside
you're
backing,
but
if
we
can
do
that-
and
unfortunately
I
talked
to
the
keith
selman
when,
when
he
was
here
about
seeing
if
we
could
acquire
that
property
by
the
city
to
do
a
right-handed
turn
lane,
this
would
facilitate
a
lot
for
your
development,
the
one
going
westbound
westbound
yeah.
If
we
can
do
a
right-handed
turn
movement
there,
that
would
really
help
this
whole
intersection.
A
We've
been
working
with
the
council
member
of
the
district
on
springfield
because
of
the
high
volumes
of
traffic
and
the
viewing
that
was
coming
on.
So
I'm
pretty
familiar
with
all
this
area,
we'll.
A
H
A
A
J
Ma'am
and
I
have
lived
on
4827
paleo
lane
for
the
past
36
years,
and
there
are
some
neighbors
there
are
in
favor
of
the
apartments.
If,
in
fact,
you
know
that's
what
they're
gonna
do
but
we're
against
the
sony
change,
because
what,
if
they
don't
do
those
buildings
and
they
come
out
with
something
else,
we
have
had
very
bad
experiences
in
the
past
with
two
previous
businesses.
J
A
A
J
D
Tax
credit
is
issued,
there
is
something
called
a
lure
attached
to
the
property,
and
it
says
that
for
the
next
40
years
it
has
to
be
an
apartment
whatever
it
was
proposed.
K
M
I
can
make
a
good
comment,
mr
sherman,
just
to
assure
you
that,
though,
that
project
is
going
up
the
fact
that
they're
bringing
the
big
four
to
a
bit
three-
yes
they're,
actually
losing
value
in
the
property
if
they
were
to
use
it
for
something
else.
So
what
they're
doing
is
good
for
the
community
man,
okay,
but.
D
A
A
K
J
A
E
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
the
applicant,
we
have
tornado
bus
company
owner,
we
have
marty
dew
applicant
representative,
we
have
property
location,
it's
lot,
two
four
six
and
eight
block
575
western
division
located
at
2720
san
bernardino
avenue.
We
have
a
zone
change
from
a
b1
to
b3
proposed
uses.
A
hotel
letter
sent
is
39.
We
have
one
for
and
then
against
location
view.
A
I
do
have
a
question
before
we
open
the
public
hearing.
Half
of
the
lot
on
half
of
the
block
is
being
zone
b3,
which
is
a
western
part
of
it.
Yes,
the
eastern
is
remaining
before.
A
Is
there
a
reason,
a
rationale
for
that
or
is
the
apartment?
I
mean
the
hotel
going
to
be
built
on
the
western
half
of
that
block
or
or
what
is.
B
A
N
A
E
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
the
applicant
javier
and
the
owner
vice
two
applicants.
We
have
buddhism
engine,
engineer,
representative
property
location,
approximately
nineteen
point,
two
twelve
acres,
loca
located
south
of
saudia
drive
and
east
of
us
highway
83..
O
I
believe
that
we
in
previous
discussions,
we
talked
about
obsidian
and
that's
south
of
this
project.
This
one
does
not
exit
that
it
exits
sodia,
which
I
think
goes
straight
to
the
highway.
I
believe
obsidian
is
further
to
the
south
south
of
the
detention
pond.
If
that's
the
one
you're
speaking
about.
O
A
A
A
And
in
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
simulator
by
rezoning,
approximately
6.1
acres,
61.
F
A
my
mistake:
this
property
is
southwest
of
crowbert
cove
court
from
a.g
to
our
one
single
family
to
our
warden
single
family
and
our
one
single
family
to
our
one
single
family.
L
E
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
the
applicant
khalidi
group,
limited
owner.
We
have
victor
j.d
navis
as
applicant
representative
property
location,
approximately
61.11
acres,
located
south
of
la
botta,
parkway
and
southwest
of
cowboys
court
zone
change
ag
and
r1
to
r1
for
proposed
use.
As
residential
letters
is
48,
we
have
the
inside
the
200
feet
notice.
We
have
none.
Four,
we
have
three
against
outside
the
200
feet
notice.
We
have
none
four
and
we
have
an
updated
one
of
16
against.
L
A
All
right,
this
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
will
speak
in
favor.
P
Good
evening,
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
commission,
my
name
is
victor
linares,
I'm
not
representing
the
development
I'm
with
ariba
sec.
We
are
in
favor
of
the
zone,
change
just
a
little
backtrack
from
from
the
previous
application.
We
did
change
the
density
into
now
into
an
r1
that
was
one
of
the
principal
concerns,
and
so
the
developer
is
willing
to
assist
into
that
change,
and
I'm
here
for
any
questions.
I
do
have
a
question.
A
I
think
the
biggest
concern
this
commission
has
is
the
high
volume
of
traffic
on
the
mines
road.
So
your
proposal
to
this
subject's
61
acres.
So
if
you
go
five
acre
five,
five
left
per
acre
density,
that's
about
300
lots,
so
that's
300,
lots
plus
or
minus.
You
know,
and
I
think
the
commission's
concern
is
okay.
That's
a
lot
more
traffic
generation
going
into
the
mines
road.
P
Just
in
case
this
is
a
of
a
rough
master
plan
for
for
this
development.
We're
talking
of
242
lots.
Okay,
we
are,
the
intent
is
to
extend
level
the
parkway
pretty
much
from
the
north
end
from
the
north
end
and
master
plan
all
the
way
to
the
south
end.
When
it
comes
to
this
south
boundary,
there
is
a
gap.
This
the
neighbors
is
a
ghetto
subdivision.
P
So
right
now
there's
a
gap
between
our
our
subdivision
to
the
the
last
plat,
which
would
be
the
school
district
at,
and
so
what
I
could
add
is
we've
communicated
reached
out
to
certain
developers
who
who
would
benefit
from
this
road,
and
so
the
only
thing
it's
it's
one,
just
to
recognize
that
it's
just
a
property
away
from
from
this
property,
and
so
it
would
just
take
us
some
time
to
really
communicate
and
try
to
really
get
get
pretty
much
everybody
in
agreement
to
really
get
that
extension
of
the
road.
P
A
A
A
Because
that
is
the
whole.
The
idea
is
to
get
this
particular
road
back
out
to
riverbank
to
allow
access
that's
correct
to
the
residents
to
come
in
and
out
from
the
world
trade
bridge
access
roads,
which
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
A
P
Area,
this
is
just
an
aerial
from
the
from
your
packet
itself.
What
I
could
say
is
pretty
much
the
segment
where
my
pen
is
at
a
little
bit
before
this.
F
A
P
B
B
P
It's
we're
matching
pretty
much
on
both
ends.
It's
about
90.
D
P
Pretty
much
we
we
are
trying
to
coordinate
just
with,
as
I
said,
with
different
representatives,
the
different
developers
like
that
we
can
try
to
get
a
pretty
much
contribution
from
different
members
and
try
to
help
out
for
that
section,
because
not
only
is
it
for
los
colombinas,
once
you
see
the
bigger
picture,
there's
pretty
much.
This
road,
you
know
would,
in
theory,
extend
pretty
much
far
far
to
this
west
end.
Those
are
different
master
plans.
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
dictate.
You
know
the
pattern
itself,
but
pretty
much.
A
Yeah,
no
because
I
mean
the
whole
idea
is
to
be
able
to
have
another
route
for
this
240
lots
that
are
going
to
be
created
to
be
able
to
access
this
property
without
having
to
use
the
mines,
road
and-
and
that's
really
what
this
commission
is
trying
to
get
at
and
we're
trying
to
make
sure
that
we
can
get
this
thing
done
to
where
it
doesn't
create
additional
burdens.
I
mean.
L
M
A
F
Right
right
now,
I
think
lavotta
has
a
lot
of
issues
regarding
that
same
problem,
that
is,
traffic
there's
only
one
way
in
and
one
way
out,
that's
mind
road.
I
know
that
in
this
year
that
I've
been
here,
there
is
a
warehouse
that
is
stuck
there
there's
another
development.
I
think
that
is
stuck
in
the
one-stop
shop
with
with
safety
concerns
right
because
of
the
right
way
and
and
the
main
issue
is
we
don't
have
an
extra
way
out.
F
Attempts
to
to
make
riverbank
all
the
way
up-
and
I
know
the
rma
and
the
mpo
okay-
are
making
inverter
and
a
studio.
Okay.
A
P
P
Pretty
much
just
just
on
paper,
there
is
an
easement
it
pretty
much
follows
pretty
much
this
main
road,
more
or
less,
and
so,
but
that
easement
is
for
the
for
the
track
itself.
P
A
A
City
standards-
yes,
that's
correct,
so
it
would
be
a
minimum.
And
what
are
you
guys
asking
for?
It's
not
gonna.
It's
collected,
probably.
A
M
M
That
was
my
comment,
mr
chairman.
Thank
you.
N
Commissioner,
not
rice
all
right,
I
was
in
the
sales
on
the
same
lines
as
commissioner
dominguez.
At
this
point,
the
developer
has
gone
from
an
r1a
downton
r1,
which
is
a
lot
less
lesser
density
and
we're
here
also
looking
at
the
zone
change
and
then
once
the
zone
changes
it's
recommended
and
if
it's
approved
by
council
at
that
point,
he
has
to
provide
the
plan
for
the
preliminary
and
then
that's
where
staff
comes
in
and
there's
traffic
impact
analysis.
N
A
Q
Q
I
would
like
to
hope
that
you
will
enjoy
this
idea
because
there's
a
new,
actually
the
muellers
are
no
longer
in
control
of
the
h.o.a.
Q
There
should
be
an
interim
board,
hopefully
soon,
because
their
development,
we
don't
know,
what's
going
to
happen.
You
all
said
something
right
good
about
it
about
the
river
road
and
I
think
that
is
a
riverboat
to
save
lives.
You
put
us
in
danger
every
day
because
of
the
heavy
traffic,
I'm
not
against
the
development.
Q
We
all
are
good
for
development,
but
I
think
their
legacy
should
be.
We
build
dreams
and
we
build
american
drones
and
that's
the
american
dream.
That
was
the
fight
that
mr
zone
defended
us
to
protect
the
american
dream.
We
had
12
jurors
that
had
the
courage
to
stand
up
and
saw
our
fight
and
voted
for
us.
I
ask
you
to
stand
up
not
to
table
it
until
a
new
board
comes
in.
Q
A
F
A
L
A
A
Okay,
all
right.
We
have
one
against
right.
Motion
carries
next
item.
Amending
the
zoning
orders
is
simulated
by
resorting
approximately
27.45
acres
designated
as
track
one.
This
property
is
located
west
of
cuatro
viento's
road,
I'm
sorry!
It's
located
north
of
las
lomas,
boulevard
and
west
of
cuatro
bientos
road
from
r1
to
b4.
E
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
the
applicant
cuadro
viento
south
a
limited
owner,
and
we
have
rick
representative
property
location,
approximately
27.45
acres,
located
north
of
loma
city,
boulevard
and
west
of
cuatro
vientos
road.
We
have
a
zone
changed
from
r1
to
b4
proposed
use
is
commercial.
The
applicant
did
not
identify
the
specific
proposed
commercial
use
letter
sent
to
63.
We
have
none
for
none
against
location
view.
R
For
the
record
here
to
speak
in
favor
and
represent
the
applicant
here
really
to
answer
any
questions
and
for
point
of
order,
the
next
six
items
for
puerto
rico-
south
I'm
here
for
those
as
well
in
case
we
avoid
the
awkward
up
and
down
for
the
next
six
items.
Okay,.
G
Yeah,
I
I
do
as
far
as
the
the
commercial
stuff.
This
is
pretty
much
all
of.
G
And
I
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
site
that
was
or
nearest
one
of
the
schools,
but
I
I
know
for
the
most
part,
developments
in
this
area
are
going
to
be
more
more
like
nothing
like
bars
or
anything.
Anything
like
that.
R
M
If
I
made
real
quick,
yes,
one
of
the
biggest
concerns
that
we
have
is
that
when
we
have
a
before
that,
it's
a
mutant
with
the
with
r1,
we
expose
the
community
to
to
the
noise
and
and
whatever
it
might
create.
As
commissioner
barron
mentioned
now
being
a
b4,
once
we
agreed
to
the
v4,
whatever
developer
builds
its
in
compliance
at
the
b4.
M
But,
mr
chairman,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
the
distance,
which
is,
it
will
be
like
a
like
a
buffer
in
between
the
commercial
and
the
residential,
even
though
we
have
other
areas
in
the
radio
that
have,
or
before
right
next
to
a
residential.
M
That
doesn't
mean
that
it's
that
it's
correct,
it
means
only
that
it
burdens
the
community
with
all
the
noise
and
all
the
traffic
would
it
be
appropriate
to
to
approve
it
with
with
a
larger
buffer.
Mr
chairman,.
A
S
L
A
K
What
is
that
ordinance
that
shows
on
the
zoning
map?
There's
like
two
ordinances
on
those
properties?
It
says.
L
B
A
A
E
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
the
applicant
quattro
viento
self-limited
owner,
and
we
have
ricardo
via
representative
property
location,
approximately
13.94
acres
located
south
of
wormser
road
and
east
of
cuatro
vientos
road.
We
have
a
zone
change
from
r1
to
b4
proposed
use
is
commercial.
The
applicant
did
not
identify
the
specific
proposed
commercial
use.
Letter
sentence,
14,
none
for
none
against
location
view.
M
Yes,
sir
yeah
there's
I
see
a
strip
of
land
in
front
in
between
the
the
road
and
the
property.
Is
that
public
is
that
a
public
right-of-way
or
who
owns
that
property?
So.
F
A
D
Thank
you.
I
I
asked
several
months
ago
when
lomanzer
was
going
to
be
open,
and
you
assured
me
that
it
would
happen
soon.
I
go
by
there
every
saturday
and
to
this
date
the
road's
not
open.
Is
there
a
reason.
B
I
would
have
to
check
I
I
don't
know.
Let's.
T
T
D
T
T
T
We're
working
on
the
overpass
in
in
association
with
the
sports
complex,
it's
coming
in.
T
D
I
I
don't
remember
the
city
putting
it
in
their
capital
plan
and
I've
yet
to
see
the
capital
plan,
so
I
don't
think
there's
any
intention
to
put
it
there.
So
at
this
point
you
rest
on
the
assurances
of
txdot
that
they're
going
to
do
the
right
thing
and
you
wonder
if
it's
the
right
thing.
T
A
A
E
E
H
A
A
E
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
an
applicant
limited
owner
applicant
owner
applicant
representative
property
location,
approximately
16.47
acres
located
at
north
dakota
near
magana,
road
and
west
side
zone
change,
request
from
an
r1
to
b4
proposed
uses
commercial.
The
applicant
did
not
did
not
identify
the
specific
proposed
commercial
use,
letter
sentence
39
and
then
for
none
against
location
view.
F
T
A
G
What
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission?
I
do
have
a
question.
I
do
have
a
question
for
the
for
the
applicant.
I
know
this
all
right.
His
property
also
now
butts
the
new
molina
middle
school
towards
the
back,
but
but
I
also
understand
why
why
the
b4
off
of
loop,
20
and
and
I'm
sure,
big
box
developments
it's
easier
for
them
once
to
entice
for
them
to
to
be
able
to
to
set
up
with
a
b4
rather
than
another
type
of
zone.
R
That's
correct
the
commissioner.
One
point
specifically
about
the
middle
school:
is
the
topography
in
that
area?
Is
the
relief
is
very
large
at
this
point
of
the
highway.
The
middle
school
is
probably
to
the
order
of
40
feet
lower
than
the
highway,
so
that
the
horizontal
proximity
is
there
vertically.
R
D
D
I
have
a
concern
because
I
don't
see
how
blocking
the
intersections
I
mean
other
than
it
saves
lives
that
it's
the
ultimate
solution
to
this
problem.
You
build
a
four-lane
highway
and
then
you
proceed
to
block
off
access
to
it,
and
then
you
wait
for
six
or
seven
years
after
you
build
it
to
figure
out
a
solution,
and
I
think
at
some
point
in
time
we
need
to
have
a
meeting
with
txdot
and
see
what
they're
going
to
do
and
we're
approving
developments,
depending
on
what
they're
going
to
do
and
they're
doing
nothing.
A
F
A
U
A
quick
comment,
mr
chairman,
I
think
it's
it's
time
that
mr
chairman.
M
Actually
appoints
members
of
this
committee
to
to
force
or
to
create
a
a
plan
because
you're
correct
we're
proving
a
bunch
of
would-be
development.
I
wouldn't
have
the
access
they
come
to
us
for
the
zone
change.
We
approve
it
because
we
have
a
choice.
I
mean
they're
they're,
the
requirement
and
their
applications
are
in
order,
but
we
don't
have
the
infrastructure.
M
So
I
guess
that
if,
if
two
or
three
members
of
the
of
this
committee
will
start
pushing
get
it
together
with
tax
dollar
with
a
tech
stock,
like
commissioner
duvalina
was
saying,
where's.
M
A
K
A
A
Planning
is
one
of
the
ones
that
has
a
lot
of
different
functions,
mpo
for
one
and
so
there's
different
mechanics
within
the
whole
planning
organization
that
have
to
really
communicate
with
each
one
of
the
different
entities
to
make
sure
that
whatever
comes
to
us
when
the
questions
are
answered
here
are
asked
here
that
there
are
answers,
some
kind
of
answers
that
are
reasonable,
not
pie
in
the
sky.
Well,
I
don't
know
yeah,
I
don't
know
you
know
that
doesn't
work,
you
know
we,
we
need
to
figure
out.
A
Okay,
we've
got
a
paved
section
into
a
roadway,
but
yet
no
you
can't
use
it
somewhere.
Somehow
somebody
screwed
up
either
because
there
was
funds
available
and
we
had
to
use
them,
but
now
they're
saying
well
and
I
think
it
all
goes
back
to
when
a
couple
of
these
were
opened
up.
There
was
some
accidents
and
people
killed
and
texted
shied
back,
and
they
said
you
know
what,
because
of
the
accidents
they
held
back,
but
I
think
it's
time
to
revisit
this
you're
going
to
have
accidents
irregardless.
It's
time.
F
Laredo
is
growing
and
we
need
we
need
to
do
address
this
right
now,
because
then
it
comes
to
council
and
whatever
we
approve
here
in
between
the
console,
then
why
are?
Why?
Look
you
don't
want
you,
you
disagree
or
you
recommend.
If
staff
supports
it
come
the
commission
supports
it.
So
everything
has.
M
K
K
N
A
Now
so
we
can
do
something
about
it
and
I'm
going
to
ask
you
all:
please
invite
the
district
engineer
from
txdot
to
come
before
the
commission
and
make
a
presentation
on
future
development,
these
existing
roadways
and
what
their
plans
are
to
get
them
connected,
because
this
young
man
here
is
bringing
in
lots
of
property
for
development,
and
these
are
either
big
box
or
a
lot
of
generation
of
traffic
that
need
answers.
Yeah
yeah,
you
know,
I
mean
yes,
you
can
do
write-ins
and
write
outs,
but
somehow
you
got
to
be
able
to
figure
out.
A
F
In
anywhere
in
all
of
these,
how
do
you
say
that,
when.
G
Mr
chairman,
I
recommend
we
maybe
formulate
a
subcommittee
or
post
it
on
or
add
it
as
an
agenda
item
for
our
next
meeting
to
specifically
discuss
these
issues
and
then
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
zone
cases
and
a
lot
of
things
going
on
yeah.
A
A
B
Let's
determine
before
we
move
on
and
we
will
certainly
reach
out
to
the
tech,
scott
and
and
and
we
we
do,
we
we
feel
very
similarly
to
the
to
the
to
the
commission
and
really
understand
your
concerns
and
have
taken
note
of
them,
and
we
have.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
commission
understands
that
you
know
the
planning
commit
planning
department
has
made
certain
inroads
in
increasing
our
collaboration
with
our
planning
partners,
especially
txdot.
B
They
do
attend
weekly
or
bi-weekly
a
meeting
to
review
all
of
these
plats
with
us,
and
so
we
have,
you
know,
increased
that
collaboration
and
communication
with
them
and.
A
B
B
Absolutely
and
we'll
we'll
make
sure
to
get
them,
get
that
invite
out
to
them.
Thank.
A
You
all
right.
We
now
have
the
next
item
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
directed
by
rezoning,
approximately
32.69
acres.
This
property
is
located
north
of
pita
mangano,
road
and
east
of
cuatro
vientos
road
from
r1
to
34.
E
A
A
E
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
applicants
out
limited
owner.
We
have
ricardo
vieira
representative
property
location,
approximately
sixteen
point:
zero
five
acres
located
north
of
vietnam,
road
and
east
of
cuatro
vientos
road
gender
zone
change,
request,
r1
and
ag
to
b4
proposed
uses
commercial.
The
applicant
did
not
identify
the
specific
proposed
commercial
use.
Letter
sent
is
nine
nine,
four
and
zero.
Sorry,
none
for
none
against
location
view.
A
A
A
L
A
Against
motion
carriers
next
item,
many
zoning
orders,
the
city,
everybody
resorted
approximately
3.44
acres
of
land.
This
is
located
east
of
bobolic,
loop
and
west
of
grande
bay
drive
from
r1a
to
r1b.
E
E
Approximately
three
point:
four:
four
acres
located
east
of
babula,
loop
and
west
of
grand
bay
drive
zone
change,
request
r1a
to
r1b,
proposed
juice,
is
residential
letter
sent.
We
have
31.
inside
the
200
feet
notice.
We
have
none
4
and
10
against
outside
the
200
feet
notice.
We
have
none
four
and
eight
against
location
view.
E
V
I
V
So
because
of
that,
we
couldn't
build
anything
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
So
in
order
to
try
to
to
have
at
least
a
few
more
slots,
we
changed
that
part
to
r1b.
We
didn't
get
to
what
we
used
to
have,
but
at
least
and
just
for
the
record.
The
r1a
is
a
4
500
square
feet,
which
is
what
it's
actually
right
now
most
of
these
lots
are
close
to
the
4
000.
V
It's
just
that
the
pronounce
is
35
and
as
per
the
r1b,
they
would
require
one
enclosed
and
two
outside
plus
they
have
all
the
other
side,
but
we
are
we're
for
this
change.
Like
I
said
this
is
the
last
phase
of
the
of
the
flat,
so
they're
not
going
to
be
any
others,
so
they
are
not
here
to
answer
any
questions.
V
D
D
V
V
It
is
27,
so
they're
not
going
to
be
more
and
there
used
to
be.
I
think,
third,
on
the
other
one,
there
is
something
I
don't
remember
exactly,
but
if
there
were
more
obviously
there
was
two
two
sided
the
street.
Okay,
on
this
case,
like
I
said,
we
cannot
do
anything
on
the
other
side,
so
it
is
only
that
side
and
it
is
the
last.
V
M
F
G
Do
you
know
if,
if
you
were
currently
it's
an
r1a,
correct.
G
O
A
A
A
F
About
the
against,
I
saw,
I
saw
that
they
that
they
sent
not
in
favor
right.
Yes,
in
those
letters
what
happens
to
those
letters.
B
B
Why
most
of
them
are
they
were
concerned
about
multifamily?
That
was
one
of
the
big
concerns
is
that
they
were
worried
that
multifamily
would
go
in
there,
and
the
r1
b
does
not
allow
for
multi-family
it's
strictly
single-family
detached
okay,.
B
Those
those
letters
were-
and
I
read-
a
good
portion
of
them-
were
mostly
concerned
about
traffic
yeah,
okay,.
G
A
A
motion,
and
a
second
by
commissioner,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
hi
hi.
Those
against
motion
carries
the
next
item
of
many
missouri
ordinances,
barbara's
ordering
approximately
22.31
acre
tract
of
land.
This
is
located
east
of
cuatro
vientos,
road
and
west
of
trent
drive
from
r1
to
to
r1b.
E
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
the
applicant
l91
properties,
llc
edward
poke,
hammer,
the
third
owner.
We
have
the
consulting
orecasteo
representative
property
location,
approximately
22.31
acres,
located
east
of
cuatro
vientos,
road
and
west
of
trent
drive
zone
change,
request
from
an
r1
to
an
r1p
propose.
V
A
A
Right,
do
we
have
a
second?
We
have
a
second
for
minor.
All
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
goes
against.
Motion
carries
all
right.
The
next
item
is
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
lawyer
by
resolving
approximately
21.79
acres
from
this
property
is
located.
East
of
u.s,
highway
83
and
south
of
obision
was
busy
in
boulevard
from
r1
to
b1,
from
r1
r1,
b1
and
b3
to
r1mh.
S
Mr
chairperson,
german,
sorry,
members
of
the
commission
staff,
my
name's
jake
wig,
I'm
with
compass,
real
estate,
investments
and
I'm
the
fee
developer
and
representative
for
kaya
tunnel
development,
and
we
support
the
recommendation
by
staff
and
we're
here
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions.
Okay,.