►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 070722
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 070722
A
B
B
C
D
E
B
A
Okay,
yes,
okay,
now
we're
going
to
go
in
and
do
the
to
the
item
number
one:
a
review
and
consideration
the
following
master
plans
review
the
revision
of
the
lomas,
the
soul
subdivision
master
plan.
The
antenna
is
residential
and
commercial
call.
A
Let
me
go
ahead
and
call
for
from
for
about
to
approve
the
minutes.
A
regular
meeting
of
june
16
2020.
A
You
help
him
here:
okay,
so
we've
got
cnc
coming
no
problem,
so
we're
going
to
go
directly
to
the
review
and
consideration
the
following
master
plans:
okay,
okay,
a
review,
the
revision
of
the
lomas
association
master
plan,
the
intended
residential
and
commercial.
The
purpose
of
the
reach
is
to
reconfigure
parkland
and
lots
in
units
23.
C
B
Mr
chairman,
if
I
will
go
ahead
and
mr
chairman,
we've
had
some
discussion
with
the
parks
department,
mr
danny
wires,
is-
is
interesting
in
doing
a
little
more
for
the
park,
a
donation
on
his
part
to
do
some.
Some
work
on
the
park,
they're
still
negotiating
that
he's
going
to
be
negotiating
that.
So
what
we
wanted
to
try
to
do
is
see.
B
If
we
can,
we
can
remove
the
park
and
leisure
comments
in
order
for
they
could
they
can
move
forward,
but
then
they're
going
to
have
to
come
back,
negotiate
a
an
agreement
and
then
take
that
to
council.
For
so
the
council
can
accept
his
plan.
What
he
would
want
to
do.
Did
I
explain
that
right,
frank.
B
That
sounds
great
to
me,
because
if
not,
then
we
have
to
stop
this
then
he's
going
to
have
to
negotiate
the
contract
go
to
city
council.
We
don't
know
how
long
that's
going
to
take
so
we'd
rather
get
this
process
done
and
then
on
his
own.
He
could
he
could
go
talk
to
the
city
management
and
the
attorneys,
and
he
can
work
out
the
deal
that
he
would
like
to
work
out.
H
Right
chairman,
commissioner,
stan
wires
for
the
record,
but
really
we've
got
so
many
departments
involved,
it's
getting
much
more
complicated,
we're
simply,
and
we
we've
worked
closely
with
park
now
for
over
six
months,
we're
dedicating
more
land
than
required.
H
We'll
pay
a
regular
park
fee,
and
we've
designed
this
thing
with
everyone's
input
that
we
can
utilize
the
detention
pond
plus
have
hike
and
bike
trails
and
make
it
for
a
nice
very
nice
area
for
the
people
of
all
the
raiders,
but
especially
district
1
and
district
2..
It
we're
really
not
negotiating
with
over
we're,
probably
going
to
make
after
the
normal
park
process
we're
going
to
make
a
separate
contribution
for
some
improvements
to
kick
started.
H
But
everyone
all
staff
members,
I've
talked
to
council
members.
They
like
the
idea.
The
parks
are
natural
and
so
we'd,
like
your
support
on
who
would
like
to
move
forward.
H
Would
you
contribute
a
basically
how
many
acres
right
it's.
B
B
Once
again
it
they
can't
comply
with
them
or
what
they
have
to
negotiate.
So
what's
going
to
happen
is
because
there's
the
the
new,
the
the
new
ordinance
requires
them.
B
If
they're
going
to
make
a
donation
or
anything,
they
have
to
negotiate
it
and
then
present
it
to
city
council
for
acceptance,
so
that
part
can
be
done
separate
from
this
and
so
that,
but
if
we
leave
it
part
of
this,
then
this
basically
gets
tabled,
and
then
we
have
to
wait
for
them
to
take
care
of
that
issue
then
come
back
when
this
issue
and
what
they
want
to
do
are
separate
items.
There's
no,
no
reason
to
hold
back
this.
This.
J
There's
not
necessarily
an
objection.
All
of
this
is
going
to
get
done.
It's
just
a
matter
of
they're
being
worked
apart.
Their
work
separately
right
now,
there's
a
lot
of
things
going
on
right
now
that
that
are
being
taken
care
of.
As
far
as
because
there's
part
of
these
part
of
this
property
is
platitude
and
part
of
it
is
unplanned.
So
it's
going
to
be
done
through
separate
instrument.
H
The
but
I
I
don't
see
what
why
we
can't
leave
the
the
parks
and
leisure
comments
in
there.
It's
just
three
that
refers
to
a
parkland
deferment
contract.
Well,
when
city
council
approves
it
on
the
25th,
we're
ready
to
follow
a
warranty
deeds
on
the
26th,
that's
right.
H
Number
three
is
the
one
that
you
will
yeah.
It
has
the
part
deferment
because
we're
not
asking
for
the
firmware
contract
on
on
that
on
the
acreage
we're
dead
that
are
being
proposed
right
now.
We've
already
got
the
surveys
up
the
deep's
ready.
We
just
need
your
approval
and
the
city
council's
approval
on
25th.
A
Okay,
leave
it
right.
What
happens
is
that
if
we
delete
the
comments,
even
if
they
will
come
back,
we
still
have
to
approve,
because
this
is
the
preliminary.
G
I
H
G
H
Have
one
on
we're:
we're
we're
150
percent
above
the
parkland
requirement
so
and
it's
it's
a
natural,
it's
a
lineal
park
with
with
several
playgrounds
on
a
good
flat
land
and
we've
got
a
wetlands
reserve
there
that
we
want
to
improve
further
with
alapas
and
stuff,
but
that's
in
the
future
right
now
we
we
want
to
meet
our
normal
park
requirements
and
but,
as.
H
H
Just
in
all
these
months
of
discussion,
the
two
items
just
got
confused,
so
we're
three,
even
the
the
parks
department,
so
a
vision
with
anita
doesn't
need
to
be
in
there
because
we're
not
asking
for
any
partner
firm
but
we're
complying
with
all
the
other
spark
comments
right,
we're
fine
with
that
all
right.
B
They've
been
talking
to
staff
city
management
and
the
attorneys
to
try
to
okay.
A
A
All
right,
okay,
now
we're
going
to
review
the
vision
of
the
rodriguez
ranch
master
plan.
Was
that
gonna
be
a
table
all
right?
Yes,.
A
K
A
C
L
L
L
This
area
we've
already
reviewed
the
comments
that
that
staff
has
provided.
We
agree
with
all
comments,
except
on
the
tia.
We
discussed
that
with
the
traffic
director
we've
already
have
met
with
txdot
there's
two
existing
driveways
that
currently
serve
this
location.
One
driveway
in
particular
serves
phase
one,
which
is
a
preliminary
plat
on
tonight's
agenda.
L
Later
on,
the
other
driveway
provides
access
to
phase
two
to
which
will
be
developed
with
access
easement
to
serve
the
other
buildings,
and
so
initial
meetings
with
text
authors
have
indicated
that
they
are
are
going
to
allow
their
screwdrivers
to
remain.
As
long
as
we
provide
an
access
easement
for
phase
2
and
do
not
add
or
propose
any
more
driveways
at
this
point,
which
we
do
not
propose
to
do,
that,
txdot
is
also
currently
developing
an
access
management
program
along
with
not
359,
where
they're
building
medians
along
to
design.
L
Currently
in
the
current
phase,
one
construction
comp
is
completed
right.
Just
northwest
of
this
development
in
front
of
the
dollar
general
store
that
was
recently
built
in
that
area,
and
we
understand
they'll
continue
to
build
more
medians
to
the
east
to
provide
better
access
management
when
that
occurs.
This
particular
location
will
have
only
right
and
right
out
ability,
and
so
we
already
have
met
with
with
textile
in
that
regard.
L
So
for
those
for
those
issues
we
talked
to
the
traffic
director
and
he
has
he's
in
agreement
to
us
not
to
require
a
tia
for
this
particular
master
plan
at
this
time,
but
we
have
agreed
to
in
the
in
the
planning
process
when
we
get
to
phase
two
to
work
with
his
department
to
do
a
comprehensive
job
of
good
traffic
circulation
and
traffic
management
and
conjunction
with
what
tech
stocks
plan
to
do
so
tonight.
L
I
stand
before
you
in
agreement
to
comments,
except
for
the
removal
of
the
tiaa
comment
on
the
master
plan.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'd
be
happy
to
ask
questions
to
the
engineer.
D
And
then
the
current
consideration
of
this
master
plan
is
for
consumer
development
towards
the
back
of
the
market.
Yes,.
L
The
goal
here
is
to
incorporate
the
property,
all
the
property
that
he
currently
owns,
that
he's
already
has
basically
developed.
We
want
to
incorporate
that
so
our
goal
tonight
was
to
get
phase
one,
which
is
just
a
one
lot
plot
on
the
preliminary
side
approved
and
to
incorporate
all
his
other
land
as
phase
two
he's
already
done,
some
public
improvements
when
he
did
the
first
round
of
cladding
with
phase
one,
including
wastewater,
water
and
storm
water
management
detention.
G
L
L
L
Expand
359.
in
our
initial
meeting
with
them.
They
did
not
indicate
they
were
going
to
widen
the
right-of-way.
For
that,
all
we
know
is
that
there
are
going
to
do
this
median
project
to
improve
the
level
of
service.
Do
you
personally
believe
that
the
median
is
a
cure-all,
no
yeah?
It
just
depends
on
the
how
what
type
of
median
is
built
and
how
high
it's
built
and
the
type
of
respect
that
the
public
gives
it
if
they,
if
all
those,
if
those
ingredients
mat
you
know,
are
applied,
then
perhaps
it
could
work
better.
L
It's
it's
a
mixture
of
commercial
and
trucking,
but
more
oil
and
gas
type,
which
is
really
the
old
school
method
that
was
in
this
part
of
the
city
years
back.
The
trend
that
we're
seeing
in
that
area
is
that
there's
less
and
less
of
that
actually
occurring.
We
have
another
client
further
to
the
west,
who
has
the
same
operation
and
he's
basically
clear
clearing
the
land
for
for
a
new
urban
renewal
plan,
and
so
we
see
this
happening
less
and
less,
but
my
client's
goal
is
to
legalize
the
property
through
the
planning
process.
L
D
L
Sir,
our
go
yeah.
We
plan
to
bring
phase
two
further
down
this
year
later
to
you
all
to
look
at
that.
What
we
want
to
really
do
here
is
work
with
with
the
county
as
well.
You
know
this
area
was
colonia
that
was
called
old,
milwaukee
west
and
in
the
early
2000s
the
city
was
in
the
county
work
together
to
extend
water
and
wastewater
to
the
colonias.
L
In
this
particular
case,
the
water
and
sewer
was
actually
in
design,
but
it
was
stopped
and
as
a
result
of
that
stoppage,
this
developer
decided
to
just
pursue
the
planning
on
his
own,
and
now
here
we
are
in
2022,
and
so
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
to
try
to
put
the
master
plan
in
a
position
where
perhaps
we
can
still
work
with
the
county
to
do
some
colonial
improvements
to
the
south
of
this
location,
because
there
are
existing
single-family
homes.
There.
L
No,
in
this
particular
case,
this
property
did
not
have
the
the
lue
requirement,
because
the
water
was
was
installed.
L
I
was
the
engineer
of
record
and
there
were
lues.
I
recall
that
I
worked.
Actually.
I
worked
with
pablo
martinez
at
the
utility
department
to
develop
the
original
plan
of
that
and
and
all
milwaukee
west
was
not
part
at
that
time
of
the
lue,
but
the
eg
ranch
property
to
the
south
is
part
of
it.
We
were
the
engineers
on
that,
and
so
there's
there's
there's
certain
properties
that
worry
we're
not.
A
A
That
being
said,
anybody
who
has
any
questions
for
mr
garza
or
any
of
the
engineers
everybody
now
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
put
it
for
a
boat
and
what
are
the
witches
of
the
committee.
G
K
To
approve
the
preliminary
to
approve
this
subject,
no.
A
K
A
M
L
Chairman
edward
gutson,
with
crane
engineering,
we
do
agree
with
staff
comments.
This
is
a
one
lock
flap
for
the
building
to
the
far
this
left
hand
side
if
you're
facing
toward
the
highway.
The
plan
was
to
also
develop
with
easements,
based
on
existing
as-built
conditions.
From
the
previous
attempt
to
plot
this
property,
there's
been
a
lot
of
infrastructure
built
following
city
standards.
So
now
the
easements
are
now
in
place
on
the
flat
to
make
the
easement
much
easier
to
manage.
K
The
open
engineering
company
representing
the
applicant
and
just
here
answering
your
questions:
you're
concurred.
A
With
the
comments,
if
you
okay,
any
for
the
more
members,
have
a
question.
E
I
D
A
M
Yes,
sir,
the
applicant
is
d
j,
alexander
development
engineer.
Primary
engineering
proposed
use
commercial,
the
zoning
for
this
one
lot.
Development
is
b3
a
location
view.
E
On
the
lot,
yes,
it's
it's
hyper
commercial,
but
I
don't
know
the
end
user
at
this
time,
some
type
of
commercial
use.
Do
you.
E
F
G
F
Which
is
not
luke,
20
anymore,
it's
about
bullock,
I-69,
us-59,
up
to
interstate
that
they're
classified
as
an
interstate
order
to
build
the
overpasses.
So
it's
a
long
story.
E
E
M
N
Yes,
good
evening,
chairman
and
members
of
the
commission,
alfredo
martinez
with
crane
engineering
on
behalf
of
the
developer,
we
concur
with
those
comments
that
were
listed.
The
only
thing
we
would
add
there
is
to
address
those
floodplain
related
comments.
What
our
approach
is
going
to
be
is
to
go
in
and
do
a
clomerif
request
based
off
the
proposed
improvements
to
hopefully
bring
down
those
bfe
elevations
according
to
analysis,
so
that
that's
just
something
we
want
to
add
on
there.
B
One
of
the
other
items
that
we
have
that
we've
been
trying
to
work
out
with
the
developer
on
these
apartments
is
you
know
that
they're
doing
a
detention
pond
and
they've?
The
engineer
has
worked
with
city
environmental,
to
expand
the
detention
pond
to
accept
more
water
into
their
system.
This.
B
This
is
a
flood
plain
area,
and
so
the
engineer
did
that
he
has
expanded
it
out
with
that
being
said,
their
design
comes
up
about
20
20
parking
spaces
short
they're,
offering
to
put
some
more
trees
in
in
this
complex,
and
so
the
issue
we
have
is
is
to
create
the
variance
for
that
because
of
the
fact
that
they
did
expand
their
their
detention
pond
to
accept
more
water.
B
So
I
bring
that
to
the
table
because
we
really
don't
have
a
mechanism
for
that
to
to
offer
a
credit
of
some
sort
if
they
help
the
city's
request.
You
really
don't
have
anything
like
that.
So
I
bring
that
to
your
attention
because
that's
something
that
we
have
been
discussing.
One
of.
A
The
one
of
the
biggest
problems
that
I
see
in
this
development
is
that
we're
increasing
the
traffic
in
that
area
in
accordance
to
what
they
plan
to
build
there,
and
even
though
we're
creating
that
pond
there
and
if
we're
going
to
be
sacrificing
or
we're
going
to
be
accepting
shortage
of
parking,
but
that
what
it
does
it
overflows
into
the
street
or
to
adjacent
properties,
see
we're
looking
at
the
preliminary
plan.
A
G
E
G
L
Provides
drainage
relief
for
the
entire
east
side
of
the
pearson
road,
including
the
library
and
other
other
developments
in
that
area,
including
the
mccrearson
road
right
away,
so
there's
not
any
other
form
of
access
to
a
public
street
to
our
south
or
to
our
east.
The
only
form
of
access
that
we
have
on
this
project
to
a
public
street
is
to
the
north.
L
N
N
Correct-
and
I
also
compared
that
to
what
the
capacity
of
that
street
based
off-
I
guess
federal
standards
so
based
off
a
two
lane
road
at
35
miles
per
hour,
signalized,
it's
near
the
vicinity
of
that
traffic
signal,
so
the
level
of
services
that
you
can
achieve
are
either
b
c
d
or
e
b
b
being
the
highest.
So
what
that
allows
in
that
scenario,
that
type
of
road
that
speed
those
two
lanes,
the
to
get
a
level
service
of
b,
it's
12
800
vehicles
per
day-
would
be.
N
L
Traffic,
as
you
mentioned
our
commissioner,
we
still
can
achieve
an
adequate
level
of
service
on
hillside.
In
addition,
the
deep
restrictions
on
this
property
required
us
to
provide
a
right-wing
reserve
in
case
the
city
and
the
future
wanted
to
expand
this
roadway.
So
this
preliminary
plaque
provides
for
that
and
and
the
site
plan
that
was
developed
for
this
project
also
incorporates
that
property
reserve.
L
I
N
Actually,
once
it
comes
to
the
floodplain,
it's
not
related
to
that
southern
channel.
That
floodplain
is
coming
from
the
sakata
creek
channel,
which
is
to
the
north
west
of
this
area.
A
I
don't
I
don't
see
that
the
the
biggest
problem
would
be.
Commissioner,
on
on
the
drainage.
I
see
we
got
120
units
that
are
going
to
be
built
there,
so
I'm
thinking
that
we're
looking
about
at
least
double
the
amount
of
vehicles
so
we're
looking
at
about
240
vehicles
are
going
to
be
exiting
at
one
particular
within
time
limit.
You.
G
A
Was
there
anything
that
you
looked
at
that
that
might
impact?
I
know
we're
looking
at
the
preliminary
project?
Okay,
so
I
just
want.
Can
you
answer
that
question?
We're
gonna
have
at
least
240
vehicles
exiting
at
one
particular
time,
not
all
together,
of
course,
but
do
you
see
a
problem
there
on
hillside.
I
Who
sets
up
the
compliance
for
the
displacement
of
water,
who
reviews
that
for
the
displacement
of
water?
Well,
yeah
he's
going
to
pave
the
run.
A
lot
he's
going
to
build
so
the
water's
going
to
go
somewhere.
It's
not
going
to
stay
there,
that's
correct!
That's
the
design
use
that
when
he
says
that
he's
going
to
increase
the
tension,
what
size
does
it
the
detention
have
to
be?
N
That
yeah,
that
that's
a
subject
to
the
review
by
the
engineering
department
once
we
once
we
get
preliminary,
we
go
to
one
stop
shop
and
they
review
the
plans
and
the
calculations
and
the
analysis
we
developed
is
the
engineer.
I
G
B
L
O
Good
evening,
members
of
planning
and
zoning,
my
name
is
jed
brown,
I'm
not
the
applicant,
but
I
am
the
developer.
That's
working
on
this,
and,
and
there
haven't
there-
hadn't
been
a
specific
question.
That
was
something
that
really
ties
to
the
developer.
As
much
as
the
civil
engineer,
I
would
like
to
point
out.
One
thing
this
is
a
this
is
a
tax
credit
application
project
we
submitted.
O
This
is
currently
this
project's
in
first
place
in
region
11,
which
is
for
everything
from
eagle
pass
all
the
way
down
to
the
tip
of
brownsville
10.
There
was
10
applicants
our
applications
in
first
place
back
in
november.
In
order
to
receive
a
resolution
of
support
from
the
city
of
laredo.
You
have
to
actually
apply
to
receive
that
support.
We
did
that.
O
We
received
the
re
support,
here's
a
copy
of
the
resolution
supporting
it
when
we
did
that
we
submitted
to
the
community
development
department
and
that
was
given
to
different
members.
I
would
expect
all
the
members
of
council
and
the
mayor
a
copy
of
our
application,
a
copy
of
our
site
plan,
a
copy
of
information
regarding
parking
everything
they
needed
to
know
about
this
this
project
in
order
to
receive
this
resolution
of
support.
So
I
did
want
to
let
you
know.
O
This
is
something
that
we've
been
working
on
really
pre-day
in
november,
but
we've
got
months
into
it.
The
actual
awards
for
tax
credits
happen
at
the
end
of
this
month.
On
the
last
thursday,
in
july,
we
typically
don't
move
on
plating
or
change
of
zone.
Until
we
see
the
final
awards
list
and
that's
where
we
are
now
the
owners
of
the
property,
we
wouldn't
want
to
do
something
that
would
encumber
their
property
without
knowing
that
we're
going
to
receive
an
award
of
credit.
I
For
being
involved
in
tax
credits,
I
moved
to
approve,
subject
to
the
conditions.
O
The
approval
of
mr
novato
brought
up
the
parking,
the
trade-off
of
the
enlarged
detention
pond
for
the
2025
parking
space,
I
believe,
is
the
final
number.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
part
of
the
motion,
if,
if
that's
okay,.
M
G
C
P
I
I
O
Here's
35
this
is,
and
it's
in
this
parcel
right
here.
E
P
We
do
concur
with
the
comments
you
do
yeah.
We
didn't
cover
the
comments
and
in
regards
to
some
of
the
the
vfe
questions
and
floodplains,
we
are
working
on
a
clomer
lomar
with
crane
to
remove
the
entirety
of
the
property
from
the
flood
view.
P
Yes,
this,
this
entire
property
is
encompassed
by
those
drainage
channels,
so
the
intent.
P
C
A
Okay,
we
got
the
section
this
consideration,
the
following
final
flats
and
final
replace.
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
take
item
eight,
a
b
and
c
so,
okay,.
N
G
B
Mr
chairman,
if
you,
if
you
can
just
well,
I
guess
don't
take
action.
Don't
do
anything
for
a
that.
That
was
an
error
that
was
already
approved
last
meeting
and
it
got
put
on
so
if
we
could
just
do
9
dnc,
okay,.