►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Special Meeting 072822
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Special Meeting 072822
B
C
D
B
C
Would
it
be
appropriate
to
make
a
motion
to
excuse
the
members
that
that
were
asking
today?
Did
anybody.
B
C
B
D
B
B
E
B
E
Yes,
mr
chairman
applicant
is
victor
who
engineers
ricardo
ramos
proposed
use
this
commercial
and
the
zoning
for
this
one.
Not
development
is
r1
location,
view,
aerial
view,
street
view.
B
Let's
table
the
side
until
the
end
I
mean
I
did
tell
all
the
engineers
that
it
was
prudent
for
them
to
be
here
whenever
they
had
a
plaque
and
if
they
are
not
here,
we'll
give
him
an
opportunity.
So
we
can
have
a
motion
to
table
this
till
the
very
end.
Emotion,.
B
A
E
A
B
D
I
would
like
to
negotiate
with
a
couple
of
comments
with
planning
comment.
Number
four
number.
A
D
We
are
gonna
speak
with
the
traffic
department.
This
plat
actually
already
got
submitted
to
one
stop
shop.
This
past
tuesday
know
we
need
to
wait,
but
because
it
was,
it
was
postponed
this
meeting.
In
this
case
it
came
the
other
way
around,
but
we
do
have
when
you
have
a
major
arterial
and
a
local
street.
The
distance
from
the
intersection
to
put
a
driveway
is
a
hundred
feet.
D
Minimum
we're
right
at
108,
but
what
we'd
like
to
do
is
get
with
the
neighbor
to
have
a
shared
access
on
our
common
east
boundary
line,
if
not
a
little
bit
further,
so
this
note
would
actually
hinder
us
from
having
a
a
shared
access
and
that's
basically
what
I
would
like
you
know
for
us
to
consider
to
go
to
one:
stop
shop
speak
with
traffic.
D
If
traffic
agrees
you
know,
allow
us
at
least
to
put
that
on
the
plat
now
the
shared
axis
would
still
require
a
note
on
the
plaque
for
shared
access
where,
wherever
it
may
be,
I
will
say
this:
it
has
to
be
pushed
the
current
at
least.
E
D
On
the
screen,
there's
can,
if
you
can
see
the
you,
can
show
the
picture.
D
So
there's
two
poles
there,
so
we
have
to
push
it
as
furthest
east
as
possible.
Yeah.
Now
that
that
puts
us
at
that
110
range,
which
goes
beyond
the
parameters
of
the
ordinance
that
is
cited
in
common
four
common
four
is
actually
good.
Limitations
regarding
axis
should
be
placed
on
the
plat.
Whichever
way
we
go,
whether
we
put
one
on
shiloh
or
not,
but
the
number
five
placing
the
note
prohibiting
access
from
shiloh.
It
kind
of
limits
us
from
actually
creating
a
deal
with
with
the
neighbor.
D
We
did
we
it's
just
west
of
it.
We
did
have
a
report
by
a
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
can't
exactly
I
don't
know
the
exact
name
I
did
submit
it.
I
believe
I
submitted
it
with
the
preliminary.
D
D
B
B
B
D
We're
familiar
with
the
ghosts:
I've
looked
at
this
property,
so
many
people
have
come
and
looked
at
it.
I've
known
that
there's
been
a
a
cemetery
there.
That's
hence
why
they
did
the
report
yeah
yeah,
so
it
and
the
report
it
was
taken
to
the
historical
commission
as
well.
Okay,.
B
D
Number
five
yes
delete,
number
five,
but
so
that
everybody
can
get
a
warm
and
fuzzy
feeling
number
four
has
us
putting
limitations
for
access
on
the
plat,
so
whether
traffic
says
no
access,
then
we
would
have
to
put
a
limitation
as
far
as
no
access
off
a
shiloh
if
they
allow
for
a
shared
access.
We
still
would
put
a
note
delineating
where
the
shared
access
is,
and
we
actually
have
to
put
an
easement
on
there
for
that
shared
access,
so
either
way
yeah.
D
B
D
Of
that
traffic
is
coming
out
through
there,
I
I
did
bring
a
map
I
don't
want
to
so
this
is
this
intersection
is
where
shiloh
actually
widens
yes,
so
it's
wider
on
our
side
on
the
east
side
of
snowfalls,
so
it
kind
of
acts
like
a
auxiliary
lane
to
go
in
if
and
when
we
do
put
an
axis,
so
it
doesn't
impede
the
free
flow
of
traffic
along
shadow.
Okay,
yeah,
if
I
made
sure
real,
quick.
D
C
B
I
agree,
like
I
mean
the
way
the
intersection's
set
up
like
rick
says:
yeah,
it's
not
a
bad
issue
and
then
you've
got
the
additional
street
that
was
built
used
to
that
right.
That
also
provides
parallel
relief.
That
way
so,
okay,
it's
not
that
big
a
deal
yeah.
Okay,
any
other
questions
for
the
engineer
I'm
going
to
approve.
I
have
a
motion
to
approve.
Second
point.
A
B
Why
don't
we
take
all
of
item
b
as
a
whole?
Can
we
have
a
motion
to
take
them
off
as
well
motion?
Second
from.
B
B
Okay,
eight
and
nine
are
just
compliance.
Administrative
action
is
all
we
need.
So
can
we
have
a
motion
to
take
item
eight
and
item?
Nine
together
makes
a
motion
daniella
seconds,
that
motion
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
hi
all
right
motion
carries.
The
next
item
is:
can
we
have
a
motion
for
approval.
B
A
C
B
B
B
B
C
B
Let
me
tell
you
one
thing:
I
do
want
you
to
instruct
this
engineer
and
I
want
every
engineer
to
listen
to
this.
If
you're
not
here
for
your
item,
we
probably
will
table
the
item
a
lot
of
times.
Questions
come
up
from
the
commission
here
and
if
you're
not
going
to
be
here
to
answer
the
commission,
then
we're
not
going
to
go
ahead
and
you
know
move
forward.