►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 100721
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 100721
A
A
A
C
C
D
C
And
the
staff
recommendation
staff
does
not
support
the
proposed
annexation.
The
organization
may
have
impacts
with
counties
once
or
road
realignment
project
has
funded
through
the
central
transportation
county
transportation
infrastructure
fund.
The
staff
recommends
that
the
annexation
be
postponed
until
this
time,
as
it
warms
the
red
railing
projects
finalized
and
accepted
by
both
the
city
of
the
county,
since
the
staff
does
not
support
the
initial
zoning,
as
the
proposed
support
is
not
a
highway,
staff
will
be
supportive
of
b3
initial
zoning
designation.
D
C
Representing
the
client,
this
is
the
first
we
hear
of
this
comment
from
tech
stop,
but
we
do
have
some
technical
solutions
or
better
understanding
for
this.
So
I'm
going
to
be
talking
about
the
next
five
annexations
that
I
know
we're
not
that
out
there,
but
just
keep
in
mind
because
it's
going
to
be
the
same
conversation.
C
C
C
C
So
little
history
on
this
area
kind
of
drawn
an
overall
map
here,
the
area
in
green
or
not
most
of
the
area
in
green
is
owned
by
the
city
of
laredo.
This
road
comes
around
here,
comes
up,
comes
back
down,
comes
down
and
goes
this
way
that
area
owned
by
the
city
of
radio
is
the
future
site
of
the
sports
complex
we're
going
to
have.
Hopefully
you
know
multiple
fields,
soccer
fields,
baseball
fields
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
In
the
master
plan,
this
area
is
already
annexed
by
the
city
of
louisville.
D
C
Sur
some
of
that
portion
is
in
the
city
of
laredo
and
the
other
portion
is
in
the
in
the
county.
This
portion
right
here
is
in
the
city
of
laredo.
That's
the
annex
right
there,
where
it
says
r1
beyond
that
point.
It's
the
county,
so
county
got
some
funds
from
the
state.
Txdot
is
the
pass-through
entity
that
will
pay
for
those
for
the
improvements
here.
The
oversight
was
done
by
the
city
and
the
county
in
conjunction
because
it's
both
in
both
municipalities,
I
guess
for
lack
of
better
words
text
out.
C
I
guess,
pays
the
bill
at
the
end
of
the
day.
This
right
away
was
already
has
already
been
conveyed
to
the
municipalities
or
in
this
case,
to
web
calendar,
since
this
was
already
in
the
city
of
laredo.
So
this
right
away
is
owned
by
the
municipality
city
of
radio
and
webb
county,
we're
not
trying
to
annex
any
part
of
the
road.
So
when
we
first
met
with
staff
a
while
back,
this
is
a
long
time
coming.
C
When
we
met
with
staff,
we
were
trying
to
come
up
with
scenarios
on
how
we
should
annex
this
property.
Should
we
include
the
role,
should
we
annex
it
all
as
one?
It
ended
up
being
that
in
one
of
our
last
meetings
we
got
to
a
point
where,
where
is
the
road
right
now?
How
far
are
we
in
construction?
C
So
the
road
is
probably
about
98,
complete
they're
missing
a
little
bit
of
one
culvert
and
they're
gonna
a
little
bit
of
a
tie-in
on
tech
stock.
But
if
you
go
out
there,
it's
already
blacktop.
C
This
road
is
a
big
road.
So
when
we
make
the
determination
of
how
we
would
annex
the
road
actually
cuts
our
annexation,
because
our
client
doesn't
own
the
road
anymore,
he
doesn't
own
the
right-of-way,
so
he
only
owns
beyond
that
right
away.
So
the
comment-
and
I
know
mr
narado
just
went
back
there.
The
comment
is
textile.
C
Road
gets
annexed
right
now,
the
world's
not
getting
annexed
as
per
these
annexations,
we're
annexing
private
property
beyond
the
public
ways.
Why
are
we
doing
this?
The
sports
park
is
looking
to
come
in
next
year
at
the
end
of
next
year.
We
annex
now
by
the
time
it
gets
finalized.
Hopefully,
in
january
that
gets
finalized,
we
can
proceed
with
planning
building
permitting
so
that
it
can
come
in
at
the
same
time
that
the
sports
part
comes
in.
So
then
you
have
the
amenities
around
the
sports
park
that
are
going
to
complement
it.
If
we
wait.
C
So
the
comment
by
the
by
by
mr
nalado
that
tech
said,
I
think
tech
stop
under
my
understanding
is
they're
worried
about.
So
the
process
that
they're
going
to
do
is
once
this
road
goes
through
final
inspection,
right
it'll
and
the
plaque
gets
recorded
that
that's
going
to
get
recorded
and
the
signatures
on
that
plat
are
city
of
laredo
and
webb
county
once
that
pack
gets
recorded
that
this,
this
piece
of
property
gets
dedicated
over
to
the
public
right
now
when
it
gets
dedicated
over
to
the
public.
C
It's
still
going
to
belong
to
the
county
and
still
going
to
belong
to
the
city.
If
at
that
point
after
it
gets
recorded,
the
county
wants
to
deed
it
over
to
the
city.
There
is
a
stipulation
here
in
the
in
the
code
book
and
the
texas
code
book,
where
it
allows
for
annexations
of
right-of-way
from
one
municipality
to
another
section
43-1055
I'll
give.
C
Now
going
back
to
the
comment
again,
I'm
a
really
tech
star,
I
think,
is
more
worried
that
the
actual
road,
where
the
improvements
is
getting
annexed-
that's
not
getting
annexed
private
property
is
getting
annexed.
That's
not
that
has.
C
The
roadway
construction
other
than
that
it
just
abuts
it.
The
alignments
have
already
been
set.
The
surveys
have
been
done.
We
helped
with
with
these
alignments.
We
did
the
surveys
for
these
annexations.
They
follow.
The
roadway
roadway
is
already
on
the
ground.
It's
hopefully
let's
record
in
the
next
30
days,
and
then
we
move
forward.
I.
C
C
Issue
and
when
we
looked
up
the
statute
also
on
the
county
road
park,
we
did
come
across
this,
so
the
statute
tells
us
that
when
an
annexation
comes
in,
we
have
to
bring
in
the
county
world
that's
adjacent
to
the
annexation.
Okay,
so
we're
just
a
little
concerned
that
we
might
be
a
little
premature
in
bringing
in
this
piece
for
right
now.
It's
not
that
we're
against
it.
It's
just!
Oh.
D
E
A
G
Worked
out
good
evening,
mr
chairman
commissioners,
manuela
is
coming
out
for
the
record.
Yes,
sir,
this
is
the
same
c
tiff's
grant
money
that
is
also
going
towards
the
projects
that
you're
referring
to.
This
is
the
previous
cycle
of
money
that
is
being
spent
on
this,
but
to
address
some
of
the
things
that
you're
talking
about
the
the
tips
that
is
aware
that
this
portion,
through
the
the
4v
holdings
track,
is
already
in
the
city
of
radio.
G
I
think
at
this
point.
Obviously,
the
the
applicants
would
never
want
to
do
anything
to
risk
any
of
this
run.
You
know,
I
think
the
best
case
moving
forward
is
since
this
is
going
to
eventually
go
to
council.
What
we
would
like
to
to
to
see
is
is
an
approval.
Let
us
move
to
council
in
that
time
frame
the
applicant,
the
engineer
and
staff
will
all
get
together
with
tech,
scott
to
really
sit
down
and
clarify
the
situation.
G
I'll
come
up
with
the
consensus
and
also
involve
the
county,
and
then
once
this
goes
to
council,
we'll
have
more
of
a
a
cohesive
answer
for
what
the
next
move
is.
So
this
would
not
this.
We
still
have
more
steps
to
go,
but
if
we
get
a
denial
here,
then
we're
looking
at
a
super
majority
in
council,
then
it
just
throws
throws
the
process
off
I'd
love
to
table
this
till
the
next
meeting,
but
schedule
wise.
I
don't
think
it's
we're
marching.
C
G
A
Well,
there's
three
readings
that
are
mistaken
to
get
the
done.
Annotation
there's
plenty
of
time
in
any
one
of
those
readings
in
city
council
where,
if
for
whatever
reason
things
go
south
the
council
can
then
at
that
point
in
time,
stop
the
organization
and
deny
the
annexation
process.
So
it
was
time
for
you
guys
to
look
at
the
nuts
and
bolts
by
us
not
having
to
to
delay
this
process.
G
A
G
I
think
there's
just
a
fundamental
just
a
maybe
a
misunderstanding
at
the
textile
level.
A
G
Yeah
and
as
as
it
sits
right
now,
the
land
is
not
a
road
yeah.
It
may
become
a
road
in
30
days.
A
A
A
D
G
The
the
the.
A
Women's
like
either
way
you
look
at
it.
A
F
A
A
A
We
have
a
b-4
highway
district
that
attacked
the
land,
total
of
370.67
acres
subscriber
meets
and
balances
liberally
known
as
annexation
type
two
quadrillion
located
east
of
quattro.
E
E
A
C
Commissioner,
we
agree
with
the
support
that
we
got
from
staff
and
will
agree
also
to
the
b3
zone.
C
A
A
A
This
is
84.82
acres.
This
is
known
as
track
three
and
it's
located
east
and
south.
C
C
A
C
A
A
Recommendation
of
advanced
volunteer
annexation,
admissions
learning
at
b4
on
transfer,
1930
and
22.81
acres,
mermaids
as
accent
annexation,
track.
Four
quarter.
Olympus.
C
C
A
Acres,
this
is
our
next
station
track.
Five,
it's
located
east
of
puerto
rico's,
road
and
south
of
grand
jury.
C
C
A
C
Topside
civil
group,
as
the
previous
item
were
in
support
of
the
zone
like
staff,
and
we
ask
you
that
you
recommend
a
positive
to
the
city
council
like
on
the
previous
yeah.
Don't
change!
Okay
in.
A
Favor
anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
against
the
annexation
and
vengeance
against
all
right
before
we
vote.
Mr
sherman,
before
we
close
the
reporting
meeting.
B
Noticed
that
staff
is
supporting
the
the.
B
On
a
b4
based
on
the
fact
that,
actually
that
that
property
is
not
is
not
front
in
the
quarter
oriental
road,
even
though
the
the
owner
might
be
the
same
owner
that
the
caravan
adjacent
to
track
number
five.
D
C
So
the
the
track
that's
being
annexed
right
now,
commissioner
lamigas,
is
this
one?
It's
right
behind
an
existing
track,
that's
r1!
That
needs
to
be
rezoned
to
b4,
but
this
track
is
a
budding
roadway
on
the
major
highway
that
a
b4
is
required.
The
only
reason
this
is
not
included
it's
because
it's
already
in
the
city
of
radar
and
it
goes
through
a
different
process.
The
rezone
process
so
you'll
be
seeing
these
two
tracks
in
front
of
a
track.
Annexation,
4
and
annexation.
C
5
come
in
as
a
just
a
simple,
I
say
simple,
but
a
more
plain
reason
from
a
r1
to
a
b4
because
they
are
budding
highway
frontage.
We
added
this
track,
so
it
can
give
you
the
depth
of
what
before
business
is
required.
But
but
if
I
that's,
assuming
that
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
approve.
A
The
before
see
and
right.
C
From
from
the
existing
track,
no
that
was
a
before
it
was
approved.
People
who
were
okay,
the
staff
supported
the
track
four
and
it
got
approved
as
there
was
some
people.
Yes,
sir
yeah.
Okay,
then
I'll
go
ahead
and
take
the
comment
back.
A
Mr
chairman,
okay
and
I
apologize
engineer
michael
that's
over
here.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
letting
us.
A
I
stand
up
as
a
public
hearing
the
recommendation
of
the
ordinance
of
voluntary
annexation
and
initials
running
of
all
one,
an
attack
on
lambda
4.34
acres.
This
is
known
as
annexation
track
six
killer,
chakra
track
located
north
of
hickoff
road.
C
C
B
E
A
A
Acres
that
this
track
is
located
north
of
union
pacific
boulevard,
west
of
east
point
drive.
It's
been.
C
C
C
C
D
G
C
D
C
A
A
All
right
any
motion
to
approve
a
motion
in
the
second.
There
is
a
privilege
against
your
clerys.
The
next
item
is
the
consideration
of
the
former
preliminary
plant
supplementary
plants
item:
seven,
eight
three:
medical
section
of
the
planet
and
climate
riding
regurgitation
plant
lieutenants
medication.
A
All
right,
so
what
is
the
issue
here?
So
we
brought
in
the
engineer
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
it
in
the
discussion.
My
understanding.
H
A
Client,
I
guess,
and
so
they've
decided
to
separate
the
two,
the
the
actual
design
before
it
was
coming
in
together
we
were
separating.
C
I
If
you
want
to
know,
excuse
me,
mr
chairman
wayne
with
forest
engineering
commissioners
good
to
see
you
this
evening,
so
I
couldn't
make
it
to
the
last
meeting.
I
just
I
just
was
not
available
well.
This
one
came
in
last
time
by
itself.
Carrier
bridge
was
has
always
been
separated
because
it
might
have
different
timelines
than
the
surrounding
the
subdivisions
that
we
have
going
on
we're
wanting
to
keep
it
separate
for
for
a
good
reason-
and
I'm
just
here
to
answer
any
questions
I
couldn't
be
here
last
time.
I
We
agree
with
all
the
comments
that
the
city
has
and
we
are
engaged
with.
Txdot
we've
had
a
couple
of
meetings
with
them.
They
have
some
current
concerns
that
we
have
to
take
a
look
at
some
traffic
stuff,
but
as
far
as
the
city's
comments
to
the
planning
preliminary
class,
we're
fine
with
those
comments.
I
I
think
that
we
have
an
agreement
with
the
city
at
all
in
as
much
as
we're
just
presenting
this
preliminary
plan
to
you,
this
preliminary
right-of-way
dedication.
If
we
proceed,
I
I
I
remember
seeing
your
comments.
We
would
have
to
be
built
on
on
the
owners
she
owners
died.
If
that
was
your
main
concern,
yeah.
A
I
I
G
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
good
move
to
get
the
preliminaries
to
show
me
that
way.
We
can
get.
A
A
That
might
help
unitec.
I
know
the
city
and
touch
side
have
been
looking
at
some
changing
railway
alignments
and
going
repairings
and
stuff
like
that.
That
might
help
on
that
side.
A
I
Everything
within
I-35,
right
of
which
that's
you
know,
we'll
see.
You
know,
and
I
know
that
there
I've
seen
schematics
of
it,
but
that's
about
it.
Well,
that's
there's
a
big
gap
between
a
schematic
and
a
bridge
yeah.
You
know,
as
you
know,
yeah
so
we'll
see
and
and
we
will
be
working
with
texas
on
this
carrier.
Road
bridge
thing
there
are
some.
You
know
a
lot
of
challenging
elements
ahead
of
us.
You
know
it's
not
come
on
they're,
not
arms,
wide
open
with
us.
You
know
they
have
a.
I
A
B
You
closed
this
prison
that
mr
levine
are.
D
Staying
so
that
means
that
that
you
need
to
vote
or
you're
going
through,
not
a
problem.
No
thank.
C
Chairman
for
the
record,
the
applicant
is
d
j,
alexander
investments,
the
engineer
of
records
survey,
engineering
company,
the
proposed
uses
of
the
residential
and
the
zoning
for
the
study
lot.
Development
is
b1.
A
H
Fyi
you
asked
the
last
time
we
came
forward
with
the
zone
change
or
to
the
north
of
that
was
alexander
phase.
12.,
that's
under
construction,
okay,
yeah!
I
saw
the
word
removed.
Yes,
sir.
Okay.
C
A
C
A
C
F
J
Okay,
yes,
sir
good
evening,
mr
chairman
members
of
the
commission,
for
the
record,
we
get
jimenez
with
holland
engineering.
J
We
agree
with
most
of
the
comments,
except
for
one
of
them,
not
sure
we
agree
or
not,
but
we
had
several
conversations
that
cooked
with
mr
vivaldi
on
the
tech
stock
approval
for
the
entrances
we
did
discuss.
We
did
get
together
with
textile.
They
said
they
won't
issue
any
approvals
for
entrances
at
this
point
at
this
time
until
we
actually
apply
for
one.
J
So
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that.
I'm
not
sure
if,
okay,
you.
J
Just
kind
of
want
that
open
it
up,
don't
agree
with
this
fire
comment
number
one.
It
says
fire
hydrants
required
along
the
south
side
of
highway
359.
We
did.
I
did
speak
with
captain
vidaodi
and
I
did
get
an
email
from
him
saying
that
we're
not
required
to
do
that.
But
the
comments
still
stayed
here
on
the
on
the
on
the
agenda,
so
we
can
strike
that
one
out
and
the
reason
for
this
is
when,
when
this
plant
initiative
came.
E
J
A
J
One
as
well,
it
says
coordination
with
the
existing
design
of
neighboring
is
required
again.
This
one
is
kind
of
goes
hand
in
hand
with
this.
Plaque
came
in
initially
about
a
few
years
back.
It
was
together
with
the
adidas
tracks,
and
now
something
happened
in
negotiations
where
we
decided,
you
know
to
do
it
on
our
own
and
obviously
they're
doing
it
separately,
and
we
just
want
this
platform
by
itself
right,
whatever
requirements
are
required
for
us
for
our
track.
A
D
F
J
Meet
with
utilities
department
and
they
want
us
to
coordinate
with
with
the
adjacent
owner
our
client.
We
already
attempted
that
with
our
client
and
he
there's
just
no
communication
there
so
that
that's
why
we're
trying
to
remove
this
comment.
Utilities
doesn't
want
us
to
sit
down
or
coordinate
with
that.
I
think
you
can
do
it.
A
A
F
A
motion
to
hear
items
8a
through
9
8,
8
9
a
through
9
c
10,
a
11,
a
probably.