►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 051922
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 051922
A
A
A
B
Sir,
mr
chairman,
and
just
one
note
please
let
us
know
if
you're
battling
with
your
computers,
we've
got
some
computer
glitches
here,
but
I
believe
everything
was
uploaded
into
your
computers.
So
you
should
be
able
to
see
our
packet.
But
if
not,
please
let
us
know
all.
A
Right
all
right,
next
item
that
we
have
is
public
hearings
and
the
first
one
that
we
have
is
a
millionaire
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
of
laredo
by
rezoning
block
one
lot
block
one
block:
1707
eastern
division
located
at
919
north
arkansas
from
r3
to
b3.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record.
We
have
the
applicant
fun
and
senior
owner
applicants.
We
have
the
property
location,
which
is
lot
one
block
1707
eastern
division
located
at
19
919
north
arkansas
zone
changes
from
an
r3
to
a
b3
proposed
use
for
carlatin
offices,
letter
sent
33
none
for
none
against.
A
B
So,
mr
chairman,
what
you
have
here
is
a
this:
is
a
business,
that's
been
there
for
a
while
and
they
were
non-conforming,
and
so
they
came
in
so
they
can
get
the
zone,
but
they've
been
in
business.
It's
across
the
street,
because
I.
B
Directly
across
the
street
from
the
same
type
of
business
mechanic
directly
across
the
street:
oh
the
cross.
Three,
oh
cross
street
rosario.
A
A
E
A
F
F
F
A
A
H
B
Thought
it
sounded
like
they're
being
formed,
he
could
do
a
conditional
use
permit
yeah.
Also,
this
is
mine's
road,
so
you
gotta
get
with
tech
stock
on
the
exit
we
we
found
on
the
plat
that
they
cannot
use
wildflower
avenue
as
an
exit,
so
they
must
go
towards
mines,
road,
so.
B
B
Well,
if,
if
you
use
game
creek
boulevard
as
one
that's
the
street,
that
comes
out
right
there
to
the
right.
B
Well,
we
encourage
them
to
to
go
for
the
zone
change
first
before
they
plat
or
do
anything
of
that
nature.
So
that's
why
they're
here
first,
but
it's
up
to
the
client
if
they
want
to
go
to
txdot
and
do
that
first,
absolutely!
B
If
I
can
make
a
comment
answer,
commissioners.
I
What
he's
proposing
is
parking
for
traders
and,
according
to
the
to
the
agenda,
it's
only
68
000
square
feet.
So
it's
only
about
an
acre
and
a
half.
J
A
A
Survey,
2149,
abstract,
594
rh
reigns
original
grantee.
This
property
is
located
at
west
of
corrada
drive
and
north
of
pita
mangana
road
and
the
zoning
is
one
from
r1
to
r1a
all
right.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
hfk
development
llc
owner
who
have
pores
nangs
engineering
after
canton
representative
property
location,
approximately
9.89
acres,
located
west
of
corado
drive
and
north
dakita
mangano
road
zone
change
and
r1
to
r1a
proposed
juice.
Is
residential
letter
sent
33
none
4,
none
against.
K
J
K
Access
is
through
dolly
richter,
which
is
an
extension
of
bianca
directly
north
of
this
they're
wrapping
up
the
first
phase
of
this
subdivision,
and
there
will
be
access
through
a
couple
of
roads
within
that
all
right.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you
any
other
questions.
K
It's
one
that's
been
this
visa
dorado.
Visa.
Excuse
me,
which
is
under
construction
right
now,
is
immediately
it's
immediately
west
of
cuatro
subdivision
that
runs
along
the
hill.
If
you
pull
up
the
aerials,
do.
K
K
There
you
go
well,
I
mean
that's,
that's
from
there
you
go.
You
can
see
to
the
right
on
the
east
side,
that's
cuatro
vientos
and
the
clear
area
north
of
that
is
vista
of
eastern.
That's
actually
under
construction
right
now
and
then
we'll
be
tying
into
that
one.
L
A
A
This
is
abstract
250,
the
jose
antonio
original
grantee.
This
property
is
west
of
u.s,
highway,
83
and
south
of
texas
drive,
and
that
zoning
request
is
from
a.g
to
r1a.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
the
applicant
hbo
holdings
llc
owner.
We
have
photos,
engineering,
applicant,
representative,
property
location,
approximately
12.85
acres,
located
west
of
us,
highway,
83
and
southwest
east
is
right.
We
have
zone
change
request
from
an
ag
to
an
r1a
proposed
uses
residential
letters
sent
11,
none
4,
none
against
location
view.
D
K
K
I
believe
the
vega
lens
terminated
college
heights.
This
the
master
plan
plans
on
dedicating
new
vega
lands
to
the
to
the
west
towards
the
rio
grande
as
part
of
the
parkland
dedication,
but
the
the
city
owned
vega
lands
stopped
at
the
south
boundary
line
of
college
heights,
which
is
directly
north
of
us,
so
we're
adjacent
to
future
future
extension
of
the
vega
lands.
B
A
E
A
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
for
4b
holdings
ltd
owners,
the
grandparents
engineering
applicant
representative,
property
location,
approximately
seven
point,
eight
three
acres
located
east
of
cuatro
bientos,
road
and
west
of
here
for
drive.
We
have
his
own
change
request
from
an
r1a.
D
D
I
K
I
J
The
plant
and
bring
it
before
us,
because
if
it
does,
then
it's
going
to
create
a
lot
of
with
the
traffic
if
they
have
a
char.
A
chair
entrance,
probably
on
blue
tongue,
blue
stone,
quick
reporter,
even
even
in
the
back
of
the
property,
but
that
that
was
my
question-
that
if
it
was
going
to
be.
K
Shared
that
that
was
your
question
when
it
was
a
preliminary
plan,
and
the
answer
was
the
same.
Yes,
I
remember
that.
A
A
Second
now,
mr
narvaez,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye,
dosa
gains
not
heard
motion
carries
next
item.
A
minion
is
only
noticed.
The
city
raider
varies
on
approximately
2.85
acres.
This
is
located
north
of
lomas
del
sur,
boulevard
and
east
of
hill
avenue
from
b1
to
b3.
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Applicant
pedro
alegria
is
the
owner
als
loreto
holdings.
Llc
is
the
applicant
enter
frame.
Engineering
is
the
representative,
the
property
location,
approximately
2.85
acres,
located
north
of
lomas
boulevard
and
east
of
ehilo
avenue.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
a
b1
to
a
b3.
F
M
Favored
good
evening,
mr
chairman,
frank
estrada
with
surefie
engineering
here
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
act
and
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
B
Yes,
at
specifically
at
this
corner,
yes-
and
it
will
be-
I
think,
you're
you're,
speaking
of
where
cuatro
vientos
is
going
east.
Correct.
Yes,
that's
that's
been
finished.
We
actually
recorded
the
plot,
so
it
should
have
be
having
its
ribbon,
cutting
and
opening
coming
up.
You
know
those
ribbon
cuttings.
A
Anybody
who
will
speak
against
his
own
change
against
his
own
change
and
will
we
approve
a
motion
to
approve
from
larry
lavalina
and
I
think,
and
from
english
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye
aye
folks
against
motion
carries.
The
next
item
is
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
of
dorado
by
rezoning,
approximately
11.91
acres.
A
F
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
The
applicant
is
daniel
d
wires
owner
loreto
amanda
said
homes
ltd
is
the
applicant
insure-free
engineering
is
a
representative.
The
property
location
is
approximately
11.9
91
acres
located
south
of
bella
street
west
of
the
hilo
avenue.
The
zone
chase
request
is
from
an
r1
to
an
r1a.
F
J
Real
quick,
frank,
yes,
sir,
the
I
noticed
that
that
what
is
divided
already
it
actually
all
exits
on
on
gs3
or
is
that
goes
in
exit.
M
Actually,
this
will
be
exiting
you,
don't
see
it
on
the
map,
but
this
will
be
coming
through
texas
avenue.
You
saw
the
two
preliminary
flats
phases,
six
and
seven.
They
came
before
you
on
the
last
on
the
last
pncb
and
that's
where
everything
will
be
exiting
right.
Now,
it's
being
extended
through
phase
five,
it's
under
construction-
and
this
will
just
pick
off
and
head
through
texas
avenue,
which
is
a
collector
in
the
air.
Okay,.
J
Because
I
noticed
that
we're
gonna
go
with
we're.
Gonna
approve
r1a,
so
we're
going
to
have
more
traffic
into
into
chia.
M
There
is
another
exit
that
you
can
get
through:
burj
street,
okay,
there's
there's
multiple
exits,
but
the
main
exit
will
be
through
the
local
collector,
which
would
be
texas
avenue.
That's
that's
the
free
flow
to
texas.
I
mean
to
lomasses
or
boulevard
to
get
it
right.
Okay,.
B
Can
you
move
back
up
one
one?
Okay
right
there,
if
frank,
if
you
see
on
the
left
all
the
way
up,
that's
texas
in
the
corner
on
the
left,
the
corner
that
little
bitty
that's.
F
B
B
M
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Anybody
else
we
speak
in
favor
somebody.
We
speak
against
all
right.
What
are
the
wishes
question?
I'm
gonna
promotion
to
approve
the
sermon.
We
have
a
muncher
and
a
second
by
mr
lawalina,
all
those
in
favor.
The
motions
signify
by
saying
those
against
motion
carries
next
item
public
hearing,
a
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
for
voluntary
annexation.
Initial
zoning
of
v4
m1
m2,
total
of
876.25
acres
more
or
less.
A
N
O
Good
evening,
mr
chamberlain,
members
of
the
commission's
mission,
members
of
the
commission,
my
name
is
miguel
jimenez
with
holland,
engineering,
representing
tbd
band
holdings.
I
just
wanted
to
share
with
the
commission
this
item.
The
reason
that
we
tabled
it
last
time
is:
we've
been
doing
extensive
coordination
with
staff.
O
The
item
does
not
have
staff
support
as
part
of
the
comments
it
does.
It
does
say
that
one
of
the
one
of
the
issues
is
fire.
You
know
fire
has
a
concern
not
being
able
to
service
this.
This
area,
this
track
in
a
timely
manner.
The
second
being
some
maintenance
concerns
that
you
know
that
the
annexation
would
trigger
on
the
frontage
roads
and
in
coordination
with
staff.
We
also
started
hearing
utility
concerns.
Utility
department
also
has
several
concerns.
You
know,
as
far
as
providing
water
in
that
area,
you
know,
we
know.
O
There's
utilities,
as
is
is
under
you
know,
have
has
other
issues
at
the
moment,
so
it's
been
a
little
difficult
coordinating,
but
nonetheless
we
have
gotten
some
feedback
from
them.
So
with
that
said,
our
client
would
not
like
to
move
forward
with
this
application
at
the
moment
without
staff
support.
So
we
would
kindly
request
that
we
withdraw
the
application
at
this
time
with
with
hope
of
reconsideration
in
the
next
annexation
period.
Just
wanted
to
bring
this
this
this
to
your
attention,
and
in
case
you
guys
have
any
questions.
E
P
Mr
chairman,
commissioner,
garcia
for
the
record
utilities
director,
what
was
the
question?
How
would
you
service
water?
Well,
the
concern
is,
it's
primarily
extending
the
water
for
the
furthest
reaches
of
our
system
right
now,
but
currently,
right
now
with
the
demand
in
the
area.
One
of
the
issues
that
we
have
there
is
the
water
sits
too
long
in
the
pipes
we're
having
to
flush
large
amounts
of
volume
of
water
to.
P
Well,
it'll
be
it'll,
be
the
city's
distribution
system,
it
will
be
the
alpico
plant
that
will
be
pumping
to
that
area
and.
C
You'd
be
coming
through
the
16-inch
line
on
a
char
wrench
or
what.
P
Right
now,
the
issue
is
going
to
be
having
sufficient
volume
for
the
demand
because
of
the
growth
of
the
area
and
the
need
for
additional
boosters
and
additional
storage
volume
for
the
area.
So
it's
just
a
matter
of
the
timing
and
where
right
now,
we're
analyzing,
how
I
can
address
the
water
quality
issue
and
the
sewer
would
be
the
same.
The
same
thing:
we
need
to
address
the
sewer
and
convey
that
back
to
so.
A
Withdrawing
I
mean
all
we're
doing
is
there's
some
questions
that
are
being
answered.
I
mean
they're
going
to
come
back
and
I
guess
in
the
july
cycle
once
they
can
work
some
of
these
issues
out,
but
we.
C
Made
a
tour
wrench
put
in
the
16
inch
line
back
in
2004,
and
I
personally
supervise
the
sewer
plant
part
of
potable
sewer
plant
that
was
built
at
unitec
in
about
2008
or
seven
somewhere
in
there.
So
nothing
has
been
done
since
that
time.
A
No,
this
is,
I
think,
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
here,
mr
garcia,
is
we
really
start?
We
need
to
start
looking
at
heavily
at
this
area,
there's
a
lot
of
development.
That
has,
I
mean.
I
know
that
this
particular
annexation
request,
but
I
have
been
approached
by
large
developers
on
thousands
of
acres
directly
north
of
them
and
that's
this,
and
so
the
push
is
coming.
That
way.
P
A
Water
notice,
I
agree
with
you,
I
mean,
and
it's
it's
really
not
your
fault.
Like
like
larry,
said
I
mean
a
lot
of
the
stuff
we
did
was
in
the
sixth
and
seventh
of
2006
and
seven
and
unfortunately,
it's
been
turned
over
since
then,
and
nothing
has
really
you
know,
there's
been
no,
no
continuation
or
no
no
follow-up
and
stuff
like
that.
There
was
other
issues
that
have
come
up.
C
P
There
is
a
60-inch
water
line,
I
don't
that
that
has
been
built
and
but
again.
P
A
All
right
any
other
concerns
from
the
council
members
on
youtube.
No
all
right,
so
the
admin
has
been
withdrawn.
Thank
you
very
much.
Moving
right
along
in
the
agenda
then
review
consideration
of
the
following
master
plans.
First,
one
review
and
revision
of
the
copper
creek
subdivision
master
plan,
the
antennas
residential.
R
For
the
record,
the
applicant
is
mrmd
development,
engineer
top
site.
Civil
group
proposed
use
residential
the
proposed
initial
zoning
for
this
la
development
is
r
one
of
a
and
a
g.
S
Even
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
commission,
ricardo
villarreal
with
topside
civil
group,
we
concur
with
all
staff's
comments.
We
do
have
something,
in
addition,
is
a
variance
for
item
comment,
number
two
from
planning
for
a
street
block
length
not
to
exceed
1200.
S
It's
in
we
are
extending
the
block
from
our
adjacent
neighbor.
That's
currently
under
construction.
This
phase
is,
is
probably
about
90
complete.
N
S
So
the
blocks
in
question
not
necessarily
the
one
on
the
north,
but
this
is
los
presidentes
east
phase,
two,
it's
currently
under
construction,
it's
about
90,
about
90,
complete,
and
so
these
block
lengths
that
are
already
constructed,
we're
adding
two
lots
so
that
we
can
already
square
this
area
off.
S
S
Therefore,
it
gave
us
42
extra
feet
from
intersection
to
intersection
and
that's
why
we'd
like
the
commission
to
ask
granted
so
variants
for
that
now.
S
That
you're
adding
what
are
the
widths
these,
I
believe,
they're
45's,
I
believe,
40
45's,
the
one
on
the
corner
might
be
50.
A
S
A
A
All
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye
ross
against
motion
carries
next
item
is
review
and
revision
of
the
san
ysidro
northeast
subdivision
master
plan,
the
intended
residential
multi-family
commercial,
institutional,
existing
the
purpose
of
the
revisionists
to
reconfigure
phases,
16
17,
18
and
19
into
las
palmas
phase.
Two
and
reconfiguration
of
commercial
phase.
Two.
R
Thank
you
applicant
es
san
esidro,
north
east
engineer.
Slate
engineering
proposed
use
residential
multi-family
commercial
institutional,
existing
the
proposed
initial
zoning
for
this
2087
lot.
Development
is
r1,
r1a,
r2,
b3
and
b4
location
view
aerial
view
flat,
proposed
plaque
staff
comments,
planning.
A
C
Can
we
tell
the
engineers
that
they
have
to
be
present
for
this.
B
B
R
Thank
you.
The
applicant
is
tstx
land
development
engineer,
sure
fee
engineering
proposed
use
residential
and
commercial.
The
proposed
initial
zoning
for
this
106
slot
development
is
r
1a
and
b3.
M
M
Yes,
yes,
sir,
it
is,
as
a
matter
of
fact
it's
just
it's
it's
west
of
the
century
city
boulevard.
So.
Q
M
C
C
M
Going
to
leave
it
that
way,
if
we're
going
to
include
baseline
elevations
and
and
what
we
need
to
put
there.
As
far
as
the
the
finished
floor
of
the
of
the
homes.
A
A
M
A
The
reason
I
ask
you
that
is
because
you
know
how
we
don't
get
any
rain
here,
but
when
we
do,
we
use
it's
a
monster
and
that
area
carries
a
lot
of
water.
Okay
and
that's
why
I'm
asking
that
question
for
the
subdivision.
I
know
larry
asked
it
before
that.
As
to
how
you
were
going
to
address
that
you
said
you
were
basically
going
to
go
above
flood
elevation
on
that
correct.
M
M
We've
already
come
through
phase
one
phase,
one's
already
gone
final
and
yes,
there
were
a
lot
of
retaining
okay,
because
that's
about
the
only
way
that
I
can
figure
it
out.
B
Not
that
I'm
aware
of,
I
know
that
they,
the
ramon,
is
works
on
that,
but
I
haven't
seen
them
come
forward
with
any
map
provisions.
There's.
A
All
right
any
other
question
for
mr
estrada.
Thank
you,
mr
assad.
Thank
you
all
right.
What
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission?
I
moved
to
approve.
We
have
a
motion
ticket
and
we
have
a
second
buy-in.
Have
you
ever
had
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye,
aye,
rosa
gains
motion
carries
next
item
preliminary.
R
E
A
C
And
yet
is
next
to
where
the
current
shopping
center
is
it's
right.
Next
to
it,.
Q
It's
right
next
to
it
in
in
it's
a
front
of
the
parkview
subdivision
that
is
already
in
construction
right
now
and
phase
one.
The.
E
A
I
see
the
arrow
up
there
put
back
the
overhead
right
there
is
that
right
across
the
street,
to
the
north
is
that
the
department
of
ag
up
there.
A
All
right
all
right,
thank
you.
Any
other
questions
I
move
to
approve.
We
have
a
motion,
commissioner
and
executed
from
commissioner
dominguez,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
those
against
motion
carries
next
time.
Preliminary
consideration
of
the
plan
of
the
phoenix
village
subdivision,
phase
11
the
intense
residential.
R
Yes,
the
applicant
is
a
f
w
investments,
engineer,
cherokee
engineering
company
for
post
use
residential
the
zoning
for
this
30
live
development
is
r1mh
location
view.
C
B
Mr
chairman,
there's
a
comment:
number
six
in
the
planning
area
asking
him
to
annex
this
is
a
an
interesting
case
here.
There's
a
road
that
sits
outside
the
city
limits,
but
what
the
engineer
will
be
doing
they'll
be
planning
that
with
the
county
and
then
the
rest
with
us.
A
M
M
M
We're
moving
forward
with
a
with
the
annexation
in
july,
so
we
will
be
submitting
to
the
city.
I
think
part
of
the
conversation
that
occurred
was
by
the
time
we
go
final
and
by
the
time
we
get
under
construction.
It's
going
to
be
part
of
the
city.
Are
these?
There
will
be
some
more
homes.
These
are
marble
homes,
that's
correct
and.
A
M
A
E
A
M
Have
said
is
in
good
condition
because
it
was
actually
planted
here
in
the
city
loreto,
it's
phase,
one
of
phoenix
village,
the
the
estrella
is.
It's
paved
yeah.
A
It's
in
good
condition
and
that's
why
I'm
asking
the
question:
we're
adding
30
knots
right
or
50
knots?
What
are
you
adding
from
48
and
48.
C
N
Right
so
in
in
for
this,
when
we
have
the
plat,
that's
like
this,
it
would
be
dual
jurisdiction,
so
one
they
have
to
comply
with
all
the
county
requirements.
However,
our
subdivision
ordinance
does
extend
into
the
etj
so
which,
whichever
is
the
most
stringent,
will
apply.
N
N
No
yes,
well,
the
ordinance
does
allow
us
to
go
into
the
tj
does
with
that
by
miles.
N
M
C
Do
you
do
you
communicate
with
the
schools
to
tell
them
that
you're
going
to
put
a
mobile
home
subdivision,
because
it
goes
up
all
of
a
sudden
and
then
they
have
to
be
with
all
the
students.
M
B
L
A
Okay,
thank
you
all
right.
Next
item's
preliminary
consideration
of
the
plight
of
phoenix
village
subdivision
phase
12.
R
M
Good
evening,
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
commission,
frank
style
with
surefie
engineering.
Let
me
start
by
saying
all
of
this
is
contained
in
the
city
limits
and
we
can
purchase
it.
M
Correct,
actually
you
see
where
that
little
notch
is
on
the
very
bottom
of
the
page.
That's
where
that
road's
going
to
connect
to,
like
I
said
that
whole
road,
if
it's
not
it's
half
or
less
of
that
road,
that's
that
we're
into
the
county,
but
we
will
remedy
that
through
through
applying
for
annexation
in
july.
A
I
think
one
of
the
things
we
need
to
do
in
this
area
too
is
we
need
to
look
at
those
connections
back
to
359,
because
there
are
one
two
three
three,
but
I
need
to
remember
their
local
collectors
in
poor
shape
and
we're
adding
a
lot
more
density
to
the
area,
and
we
might
as
well
do
some
adequate
planning
ahead
of
time.
As
much
as
we
can.
A
I
know
the
county
spent
some
money
out
there
in
some
of
these
colonias
to
do
some
rotating,
but
we
do
need
to
look
at
it.
The
drainage
is
an
issue
in
this
area
and
it
wears
out
those
streets
very
quickly
because
water
ponds
in
a
lot
of
areas,
there's
not
a
lot
of
it's
all
surface
drainage
in
this
area,
and
it
causes
a
lot
of
erosion
on
streets.
E
M
E
A
A
A
C
B
M
A
That
was
part
of
the
leus
is
to
minimize
these
type
of
situations
coming
into
the
future.
It's
incredible
how
much
time
has
gone
by
so
quickly
already,
but
that
was
part
of
the
plan
as
to
what
this
whole
area,
when
those
lines
got
put
in,
is
to
minimize
these
situations
and
like
you're,
caught
in
a
situation
right
now
on
this
property
that
doesn't
have
any
use,
so
they
got
you.
B
There's
discussion
with
kcs
at
this
time,
but
nothing's
really
set
in
stone,
but
there
is
some
improvements
that
kcs
would
like
to
do.
B
Necessarily
there
there
are
quiet
zones
that
that
can
be
established
where
they
they
don't
travel
at
certain
hours
of
the
night.
But
that's
that's
still
under
discussion.
You
know
it's
it's
very
preliminary,
but.
A
This
is
like
a
holding
area.
I
think
they
have
four
or
five
tracks
where
they
bring
in
and
there's
a
lot
of
holding
in
that
area.
There's
a
lot
of
movement
here.
A
L
Sir
frank
for
this
development,
it's
59
lots,
plus
the
other
lots
that
we
just
looked
at
before
right,
right
coming
into
this
area
and
then,
as
far
as
the
romh
zone,
since
it's
a
new
mobile
home
development,
does
the
city
require
anything
as
far
as
what
type
of
mobile
homes
are
going
to
be
going
into
this
new
development?
Or
is
it
just?
You
know?
Yes,
sir.
A
There
is,
there
is
an
age
limit
on
the
mobile
homes
that
can
go
in
there.
I
don't
recall
the
part
is
occurring.
I
don't
remember
I
don't
remember,
but
there
is
it's
an
age
limit.
I
don't
I
I'm
thinking
it's
ten
years
and
one
woman
could
not
be
older
than
ten
years
to
go
on
these
developments.
I
don't
think
about
right.
No
frankly,
I.
A
E
A
T
Good
afternoon,
mr
chairman
and
commissioners,
my
name
is
ramirez.
I
work
for
cell
engineering
and
I'm
here
representing
my
clients,
anisidro
management,
and
we
concur
with
the
comments
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
L
A
R
T
Again
from
engineering-
and
we
concur
with
our
comments
right
here
to
answer
any
questions-
you
may
have
all
right
any
questions.
R
T
T
For
that
one,
for
this
specific
one,
there
is
an
axis
easement
on
the
plat,
which
is
a
corner
retail
pad.
That's
already
been
recorded
and
there's
an
existing
driveway
already
approved
by
techsoft.
T
A
Yeah,
you
basically
give
all
those
lots
access
to
that
access
systems.
So
it's
a
shared
tablet.
T
T
Yes,
for
we're
providing
access
to
lot
number
four,
not
number
five
from
that
driveway
number
three,
which
is
to
the
west
and
two
are
getting
access
through
international
through
it
and
access
these
projects.
C
Do
you
know
how
far
the
driveway
is
from
the
intersection
of
international
group.
T
T
T
Now
that's
text
on,
I
think
it's
enough.
Yes,
sir,
we
have
a
deceleration
lane
to
protect
traffic
from
turning
into
that
driveway
that
we
are
it's
being
constructed
at
the
moment
all
right.
Thank
you.
The.
A
Wishes
of
the
commission
motion
motion
and
the
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
those
against
motion
carries.
The
next
item
is
the
preliminary
consideration
replay
log
one
block
three
and
a
portion
of
the
kraus
loop
right
away:
a
clinical
industrial
sub
pinnacle
industry
center
fm
1472
unit
12
into
lot
1a
block
3,
cross
road
right
away
clinical
industrial
center,
fm
1417,
the
toilet,
tennis
light
industry.
R
Yes,
the
applicant
is
fm
1472
investments,
engineer,
gulpin
engineering
company
proposed
use
industrial
there's
only
for
this
one
development
as
m1.
L
Good
evening,
commissioners,
judd
gilpin
from
guild
of
engineering
give.
A
A
S
All
right,
mr
commission,
mr
chairman
picardo,
via
the
top
side,
civil
group,
we
concur
with
staff's
comments
here
to
answer
any
questions.
S
B
It
would
be
planning
item
number
three
number.
Three,
that's
the
one
that
all
right.
L
Are
the
wishes
move
to
approve,
subject
to
the
variance
okay.
A
R
Yes,
the
applicant
is
a
general,
a
texas
general
partnership,
engineer,
of
course,
nance
engineering
for
post-use
residential,
the
zoning
for
this
132
lot.
Development
is
r3.
K
Mr
chairman
wayne,
that's
with
borders
engineering.
We
agree
with
all
the
comments.
However,
I
would
like
to
for
the
for
the
minutes
to
note
that
the
park's
comments
are
asking
for
parkland
dedication
and
parkland
payment
requirements
for
eleven.
These
were
met
a
long
long
time
ago
and
had
to
do
with
some
of
the
dedications
and
the
rec
center
and
stuff
that
they
have
there
I'll
be
meeting
with
the
parks
department
to
remind
them
about
that.
I
reminded
them
in
the
past
and
about
two
years
ago
with
another
lsn
subdivision.
C
K
I
I
really
don't
have
a
number
for
you,
mr
commissioner,
I
mean
this
is
towards
the
end
of
the
residential
areas.
That's
for
sure.
C
B
Well,
we
have
that
that
situation
that
you're
talking
about
is
still
there,
but
since
then
there
no
one
else
has
connected
or
tried
to
connect,
but
they
still
insist
that
it's
there
right
away
and
they
want
to
keep
it
text
done.
Q
B
To
be
nice,
but
we
can
bring
it
up
to
them
to
see
if
they've
changed
their
their
position,
but
the
last
time
we
spoke
they
were,
they
were
keeping
it,
but
we
had
we've
had
a
meeting
with
txdot
yesterday
at
their
place
to
discuss
future
the
future
roadways
and
we'll
have
to
be
having
another
meeting
I'll
bring
that
up
and
just
see
what
what
their
future
is.
With
that
see,
if
we
can
do
anything.
A
Okay,
what
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission?
I'm
moved
to
motion
second
and
second,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
all
right.
Those
folds
motion
carries
thank
you
next
item
reconsideration
of
the
polar
preliminary
flats,
including
the
replace
reconsideration
of
the
platinum
nd
hr
industrial
park,
phase
3
the
antennas
light
industrial.
The
purpose
of
this
reconsideration
is
to
eliminate
the
connection
of
carrier
drive
to
interstate
highway
35.
R
K
Mr
chairman
wayne
and
support
us
engineering,
we
agree
with
these
comments.
L
What
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission?
I
had
a
question,
though
I
know
under
the
comments
and
mentions
the
connection
to
from
carrier
drive
to
i35,
because
it
was
in
the
therapeutic
plan
right,
yes
and
then
under
the
ordinance
under
blocks
and
shrinklings,
it
mentions
that
no
block
length
waiver
may
be
granted
which
modifies
this
in
the
radio
comprehensive
planet
therefore
plan
addressing
their
first
highways
materials
or
or
any
extension
of
any
street,
so
meaning
it
has
to
connect,
because
it
is
in
the
thoroughfare
plan
right.
B
So
we'll
be
bringing
in
an
adjusted
comprehensive
plan,
one
of
the
issues
that
we
have
there,
the
traffic
there.
I
I'm
sure,
you've
seen
the
18
wheelers
on
carrier,
there's
a
thousand
acres
of
warehouses
out
there
and
we're
trying
to
accommodate
that
that
traffic
there's
another
2
000
coming
online
acres.
B
B
So
what
we're
rerouting
our
therefore
plan,
so
that
the
west
side
traffic
has
the
option
of
going
south
and
picking
up
35
on
a
turnaround
or
they
can
go
west
and
get
on
a
char
roostinger
and
go
north
and
then
hit
35
and
get
out,
but
we're
trying
to
help
with
the
traffic
so
that
they
don't
they
don't
butt,
heads
and
we'll
be
bringing
that
to
council.
So
we
can.
We
can
adjust.
A
B
A
That's
why
that's
that's
what
they're
asking
for
and
basically
they're
asking
for
us
to
reconsider
that
master
plan
that
had
that
connection
text
thought
is
telling
them
we're
not
going
to
give
you
that
connection
yeah.
So
it's
it's
their
role.
So
texas
is
saying
no
we're
not
going
to
allow
you
to
connect
right.
So,
given
that
scenario
says
well,
we've
got
ways
to
get
the
traffic
out.
A
A
K
You
have
these
and
I
can
share
them
with
with
the
commission
if
they
need
it.
You
know
all
of
our
traffic
studies.
K
B
L
B
The
third
world,
the
therapy
plans
in
place
every
year
we
present
it
to
the
city
council.
In
this
situation
the
the
developer
was
trying
to
connect
here
was
not
able
to
do
it,
and
so
because
he
wasn't
able
to
do
it.
He
wanted
to
make
this
adjustment,
but
again
what
you're
saying
we'll
review
it
and
if
that's
the
case
we'll
hold
off
on
it,
but
I'll
get
you
that
information
plus
we'll
get
you
all
the
letters
that
he's
received
from
the
state.
A
A
On
the
east
side
of
this
development,
it
has
become
an
unfunctional
intersection
to
add
more
traffic
to
it
and
that's
those
are
traffic
engineers
situations
yeah,
the
planning
was
correct,
was
on
that
thoroughfare
plan.
Right
was.
B
The
comprehensive
plan
for
the
thoroughfare
player-
I'm
sorry-
I
was
told
february
of
2021.
A
A
B
We're
doing
right
now
is
we're
here
to
be
honest,
we're
working
on
some.
We
are
working
on
it,
we're
cleaning
up
some
areas
that
we
found
on
it,
we're
also
trying
to
match
it
up
with
the
topography.
Instead
of
just
a
line.
You
know
we're
actually
trying
to
figure
out
where
it's
going
to
go,
how
it's
going
to
go
just
to
kind
of
be
a
little
bit
more
exact.
You
indicated.
C
B
I've
only
sat
in
meetings
with
the
engineer
he's
not
here
tonight
his
son
was
receiving
an
award,
but
my
understanding
that
it's
moving
forward
and
everything
has
been
moving
forward.
You
know
I
I.
K
K
Part
of
the
long-range
thoroughfare
plan
and
it's
actually
a
much
deeper
thoroughfare
plan
and
as
much
as
it
goes
all
the
way
to
mines,
road,
whereas
carriers
just
terminates
right
there
at
beltway
yeah
and
we're
we'll
be
building
better
the
road
I
mean
we're
under
construction
yeah.
So
we
have.
We
have
a
connector
to
the
north
carriers
and
a
connector
immediately
south
right.
This
was
studied
in
detail.
This
is
a
traffic
study.
K
Study
right
absolutely:
yes,
that
was
approved
by
tech
staff
presented
to
tech
stock,
and
this
is
all
the
feedback
from
tech
stuff.
I
mean
this
is
not
something
that
we're
we're
requesting.
This
is.
This
is
something
that
we
were
forced
to
do.
We
came
in
with
our
bridge
we're
like
here
we
go,
here's
here's,
the
bridge,
we
hired
an
engineer
to
build
the
bridge
and
that's
not
that's
not
the
way
it
turned
out
and
that's.
A
L
Can
you
put
up
the
current
thoroughfare
plan,
please
I
just
want
to.
I
want
to
put
my
bearings
together
as
far
as
which
road
we're
talking
about
that's
not
going
to
connect
that
show's
connected
to
35.
B
I
don't
think
we
have.
We
have
issues
with
the
computers
here,
so
it's
the
first
region
to
come.
C
K
N
So
here's
here's
the
development
right
here,
they're
constructing
this
road
as
part
of
this
plat.
So
they
have
this
exit,
this
entrance
and
exit
here
and
this
one
right
here
in
the
original
when
it
had
come
in
originally
you
had
this
development
and
then
you
had
a
right-of-way
dedication
plan
for
carriers
right
and.
E
N
K
The
existing
carriers
that's
shown
under
construction
there
they'll
be
able
to
use
that
north
south
interconnection
either
go
left
or
go
right
and
accomplish
the
exact
same
thing,
and,
and
it
gets
it
away
from
that
from
becoming
a
fourth
leg
of
carriers,
which
is
the
big
no-no
to
to
that
carrier's
road
bridge.
Because
now
the
the
the
signal
timing
is
divided
by
four,
not
three,
and
that
that's
just
unacceptable
at
this
time.
So
we'll
send
we'll
make
sure
that
they
share
everything
that
we
have
with
you
all
right.
A
A
No
consideration
of
the
q
m,
my
christian,
intense
commercial,
okay,.
R
A
A
A
What
I'm
going
to
do,
I'm
going
to
approve
these
item
10,
b,
c
and
d,
and
and
then
we
have
a
motion
to
take
them
all
together,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
all
right
all
right
now
we
need
a
motion
for
approval
of
those
items.
A
A
All
right,
so
we
have
a
motion
and
we
have
a
second
for
mana,
viable
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
all
right
all
right
now
the
motion
for
approval
motion
to
approve
a
motion
and
a
second
from
under
your
head,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
motion
to
adjourn.
So
we
have
a
motion.
We
have
a
second
second
and
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye,
all
right.