►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 102121
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 102121
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
E
Property
description
and
location
is
lots
one
and
two
black
ones
and
is
either
mcpherson
subdivision
phase
form
center
airport
located
at
9802
mcpherson
road
unit,
116
bottom
only
zone
change
request
is
a
as
for
air
conditioning
use
permit
for
amusement
redemption
redemption
machine
establishment.
The
proposed
use
is
amusement
redemption
machine
establishment.
E
Staff
does
not
support
the
proposed
eup.
The
proposed
use
is
not
in
conformance
with
the
comprehensive
plan's
neighborhood
mix,
use
dissimilation,
which
not
allows
b4
uses
amusement
redemption.
Machine
establishment
requires
a
b4
zone.
The
commercial
allows
this
parking
does
not
meet
the
land
development
code
requirements
for
the
existing
uses
and
the
proposed
redemption
machine
established
in
establishment
use
commercial
plaza
parking
equals
100
available
spaces.
270
are
required
for
existing
and
proposed
uses.
E
H
H
Yes,
I
believe
you
know
it's
a
business,
that's
gonna,
you
know
bring
revenue
to
the
city,
you
know
we
have
sufficient
parking,
I
mean,
if
you
go
there
from
six
in
the
morning,
to
you
know
twelve
o'clock
at
night
you'll
realize
that
we
don't
have
a
parking
problem
until
after
10
at
night,
and
that's
usually
because
you
know
we
get
a
surplus
of
people
that
you
know
want
to
come
to
the
bar,
sometimes
which
really
happens
everywhere.
You
go
on
laredo,
but
I
mean
we
have
the
gabby
fit
the
mel's
kitchen.
H
H
A
I
I
I
A
B
H
Yeah,
you
see
the
wedding
reception,
it's
only
booked
on
the
weekends,
it's
not
even
during
the
week
and
they're
not
even
booked
every
week,
and
sometimes
they
only
have
two
weekends.
A
month
like
I
said
I
mean
I
wish
you
know
we,
I
could
have
already
brought
you
like
filming
and
everything,
but
there's
never
a
parking
problem
until
after
10
o'clock
at
night.
This
amusement
center
closes
at
11..
H
You
know
so
really,
and
truly
I
mean
I
can
use
the
traffic
in
their
hour
time
because
usually
during
the
day,
it's
always
dead.
It
only
gets
packed
when
the
gabby
fit
has
their
classes,
but
their
classes
last
an
hour.
So
it's
just
one
hour,
they're
in
and
out
and
boom,
and
then
it's
an
empty
parking
lot
because
the
professional
services
on
the
top-
you
know
I
mean
they-
don't
really
generate
any
traffic.
The
pizza
people
are
in
and
out.
H
K
L
D
H
D
H
A
H
Now
I
mean
I
know
we
used
to
have
an
amusement
center
next
door,
where
danny's
is
the
whole
thing
was
an
amusement
center.
You
know
and
like
I
said,
I
only
have
a
problem
with
parking
after
10
a.m
and
usually
only
on
the
weekends.
It's
not
like
it's
an
all-week
thing.
You
know,
and
I
believe
you
know
right
now.
You
know
that
we're
out
of
the
coronavirus
and
everything's
coming
back
to
normal.
It
gives
people
things
to
do
and
it's
just
bringing
more
entertainment
to
the
community.
O
Advice-
I
just
have
to
say
I
just
have
to
concur
with
the
other
commissioners,
because
the
concern
I
have
is
also
parking,
because
you
got
to
take
consideration
that
you
have
several
successful
businesses
in
that
current
complex,
not
like
that.
But
when
you
bring
in
macanitas
we're
not
even
sure
how
many
machinists
are
going
to
be
in
that
establishment.
H
O
D
A
Q
E
Property
description
is
approximately
0.3
acres
located
at
3301
santa
clara
street.
The
zone
change
request
is
for
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
kiosk
water
and
ice
vending
machine.
The
proposed
use
is
a
kiosk
water
and
ice
vending
machine.
16
letters
were
sent
out,
none
have
been
received
four
or
against.
E
That
supports
a
proposed
eup,
while
the
proposed
use
is
not,
in
conformance
with
the
comprehensive
plan's
low
density
residential
designation.
The
proposed
use
is
not
anticipated
to
negatively
affect
the
neighborhood
and
residents
this
the
site
is
located
along
a
collector
and
will
not
increase
traffic
to
the
surrounding
area.
The
proposed
use
is
compatible
with
the
residential
uses
in
the
area
and
will
provide
a
neighborhood
amenity
within
walking
distance
of
residents.
B
So,
mr
chairman,
if
you
you
might
recall,
we
had
this
item
come
yes,
sir.
We
had
a
question
about
it:
zoning
for
what
it
was.
So
we
did
go
back
and
review
that
and
the
the
applicant
had
to
actually
start
from
scratch
and
start
the
process
and
they've
been
very
patient
with
the
the
system.
She's
learning
a
lot,
but
I
just
wanted
to
remind.
A
R
Is
and
I'm
the
owner
of
the
property
and
if
you
all
recall
I
was
here,
I'm
back.
I
was
here
last
month
and
you
all
recommended
for
me
to
re-app
or
reapply
for
the
cup
permit
and
you
all
tabled
my
item
because
they
had
given
giving
me
the
wrong
information.
So
now
I'm
back
okay,
all
right,
so
we
do
have.
A
A
R
E
A
Is
a
public
hearing
anybody
else
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
in
favor
of
the
condition
of
this
permit
anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
against
against
the
condition
of
this
permit
all
right
now
we
have
a
motion
motion
to
recommend
all
right
and
the
second
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
those
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item.
E
Mr
chairman,
for
the
record
applicant
is
itara
incorporated,
I'm
the
owner,
I'm
sorry,
howlin
is
applicant.
Representative
holland,
engineering,
property
description
is
approximately
100
155.44
acres
located
west
and
south
of
beltway
parkway
from
an
ag
agriculture
district
to
m1
line
manufacturing
district.
E
And
stafford
supports
a
proposed
zone
change
the
proposal.
The
proposed
change
is
in
conformance
with
the
comprehensive
plan's
designation
as
light
industrial,
which
includes
m1
districts.
The
site
about
a
large
large
area
of
m1
zoning
to
the
west.
The
proposed
zone
will
allow
for
use,
is
already
present
in
the
vicinity.
Map
of
the
site.
This
site
complies
with
m1
zoning
dimensional
requirements
as
per
laredo
land
development
code,
section
24.77
standards.
A
A
E
Owner
is
celida
lindo
ltd,
applicant
and
representative
is
howland
engineering.
The
property
description
is
approximately
1.5
acre,
tracts
located
south
of
salita,
linda
boulevard
and
west
of
saint
david
lane.
The
zone
request
is
from
the
b1
limited
business
district
to
b3
community
business
district.
The
proposed
use
is
commercial.
E
A
A
And
the
second,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
those
against
motion
carries
next
item-
is
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
in
the
city
of
oregon
by
authorizing
the
special
use
permit
for
restaurant
serving
alcohol.
A
lot
one
block
one
via
enterprises
plant
located
at
6011
shiloh
drive
units,
seven
and
eight
only.
E
Yes,
chairman,
mr
trimmer,
for
the
record
owner
is
mississippi
representatives.
Mr
david
cantu.
The
property
description
is
lot
one
block
one
via
real
enterprises
plan
located
at
611,
shiloh
drive
unit,
7
and
8.
Only
the
zone
change
request
is
for
a
special
use.
Primary
first
restaurant
serving
alcohol
proposed
use
is
restaurant
serving
alcohol.
E
Staff
does
not
support
the
issuance
of
the
proposed
supe,
although
the
proposed
zone
is
in
conformance
with
the
comprehensive
plant's
neighborhood
mixed
use,
designation
and
the
proposed
use
is
similar
to
the
uses
already
present
in
the
area.
This
site
does
not
conform
to
the
land
development
code.
Parking
requirements
for
the
existing
and
proposed
uses
commercial
complex
has
133
spaces
existing
and
proposed
use
requires
179..
E
A
T
T
Previously
there
was
two
other
businesses
there
that
did
sell
alcohol
did
sell
food
and
they
were
permitted
the
sup
with
that
said.
We
would
like
to
do
that
with
our
customer.
There
are
currently
12
businesses
in
there
right
now,
including
our
customer
out
of
those
twelve.
Five
of
them
are
only
open
from
eight
to
five
okay
after
five
o'clock
there's
plenty
of
parking
and
during
the
day
right
now,
there's
still
plenty
of
parking.
T
There's
a
pinots
burger
that
is
in
there
that
people
is
mostly
take
out.
The
other
one
is
arandas,
they
close
at
9pm
and
they
have
parking
across
the
street
where
the
washington
is.
There
is
a
empty
parking
lot
that
they
rent
to
go
ahead
and
use
the
parking.
So
with
that
said,
there
is
plenty
of
parking
in
there
for
us
the
letters
that
were
sent
out,
none
were
sent
back.
You
know
opposed
to
it.
T
L
T
L
A
And
then
your
building
permit
is
in
process
right
now,
with
the
building
department.
Has
the
parking
situation
come
up
in
terms
of
number
of
parking
spaces
you're
going
to
need
because
they're
going
to
they're
going
to
ask
that
from
you?
We
have.
We
already
have
a
permit
to
remodel
remodel
only,
but
you
need
to
okay.
You've
got
the
permit
already.
S
S
T
S
I
I
I
want
to
make
a
comment
that
it's
that
actually
is
parallel
to
what
mr
gonzalez
was
made.
There's
been
a
bar
and
sale
of
alcohol.
Mr
chairman,
for
the
last
I
want
to
say
15
years
there
and
I
think
that
that
the
reason
they're
denying
is
because
of
v3
rather
than
because
on
a
b3,
you
can't
have
alcohol
and
what
he's
requesting
he's
requesting
a
permit.
I
B
One
of
the
one
of
the
differences
here
is
and
where
this
gets
kind
of
touchy,
this
this
place
is
going
to
be
a
sit-down
restaurant
with
waiters,
that's
correct
and
that
changes
the
parking
when
it's
that
requirement
most
places.
Are
you
walk
up
to
the
counter
you
pay?
You
sit
down,
they
call
your
number,
you
go
up,
you
get
your
food
and
you
go
sit
down
so,
and
we
call
just
to
double
check
to
make
sure
that
we
know
what
we're
talking
about
here.
B
So
this
is
a
sit-down
restaurant
with
waiters
and
and
that
changes
the
amount
of
parking
spaces
for
a
stat,
an
establishment
like
that,
the
previous
type
of
business
there
were
more
typical
of
a
bar
with
snacks,
or
something
of
that
so
that
that's
the
difference
between
the
two
that
we
see
here.
But
once
again,
like
I
said
we
we
did
put
comments
in
here.
We
also
put
the
time
so
that
if
there
there
was
consideration
for
the
permit
that
they
they
would
follow
these
and-
and
we
understand
that
they.
L
A
S
L
K
A
A
K
A
And
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
goes
against
motion
carries.
The
next
item
is
amending
the
zoning
orders
of
the
city
area
by
regional
attacker
land
containing
fifteen
thousand
seven
hundred.
Seventy
two
point:
two
six
square
feet
being
out
of
lot:
four
and
five
block
208
and
the
adjoining
western
half
of
the
former
malinche
avenue
right
away.
E
Yes,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
applicant
and
owner
is
mr
juan
g.
Terones
property
description
is
it's
located
in
1619,
south
meadow
avenue
and
2019
santa
clara
street.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
the
b3
community
business
district
to
be
for
highway
commercial
district.
The
proposed
use
is
commercial.
29
letters
were
sent
out,
none
have
been
received
for
or
against
location
view.
E
That
does
not
support
the
proposed
zone
change.
The
report
zone
change
is
not,
in
conformance
with
the
future
land
use
of
the
comprehensive
plans.
Designation
of
this
area
as
neighborhood
mixed
use,
excluding
the
b-force
zoning
district.
The
site
does
not
meet
the
before
location
requirement
that
it
be
located
along
a
highway
or
principal
arterial.
E
D
I
B
A
A
Have
a
motion
that
we
have
a
second
second
and
the
second
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye
aye
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries
next
item.
Amending
the
zoning
ordinance
we'll
see
the
writer
authorizing
a
special
use.
Permit
a
restaurant
serving
alcohol
on
lot,
4a
block
one
vistarmosa
unit,
3
located
at
5507
mcpherson
road.
E
E
Property
description
is
lot
for
a
block
one
piece:
thermostat
subdivision
unit,
3
located
at
5507,
memphis
and
road.
The
zone
change
request
is
for
a
special
use
permit
for
restaurants.
Serving
alcohol
proposed
use
is
a
restaurant
serving
alcohol
in
baru
de
brasil
16
letters
percent
out.
None
have
been
received,
four
against.
E
E
It
is
compatible
with
the
mix
of
uses
present
in
this
area
and
meets
the
minimum
distance
requirement
of
300
feet
between
the
proposed
use
and
the
nearest
residential
district
as
park
or
church.
As
per
the
land
division.
Land
development
code,
section
24.93.8
distance
to
the
nearest
residential
district
use
kohler
park
is
690
feet.
E
The
parking
does
not
conform
to
the
land
development
code
requirements.
The
location
has
38
existing
spaces.
The
proposed
use
requires
a
total
of
58
20.
More
parking
spaces
will
be
required
to
comply
if
approved,
suggests
the
following
conditions
for
the
sap,
the
sap
that
are
contained
in
the
staff
report.
L
A
U
L
A
All
right
any
questions
for
the
applicants.
Commission
all
right.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
comment.
Thank
you.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
special
use
permit
in
favor
of
a
special
use.
Permit
anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
against
the
special
use
permit
against
the
special
use
permit
right.
What
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission
when
we
look
at
the
requirements
for
parking?
A
B
Well,
okay,
so
there's
two
different
things:
we
have
in
our
subdivision
ordinance,
it's
specific
to
there's
a
there's,
a
formula
for
every
200
square
feet,
one
and
it
works
like
that.
We
don't
do
it
by
the
amount
of
customers
are
going
to
go
in
there
so
and
that's
how
the
ordinance
reads.
But
once
again
in
this
situation,
it's
the
same
thing:
it's
a
sit
down
with
waiters
that
kind
of
thing
and
it
takes
it
to
a
different
level.
A
K
A
It's
like
800,
it's
not
a
straight
line,
though
from
north
to
the
first
residents.
You've
got
to
go
from
the
door
to
the
property
line,
to
the
property
line,
yeah
it's
not
as
a
crow
flight,
because
the
daughter
property,
let
me
tell
you
what
I'm
having
a
problem
with
I'm
having
a
problem,
because
this
has
been
a
restaurant
for
20
or
30
years,
serving
alcohol.
A
A
There's
two
things
you
got
to
remember
one
is:
we
did
a
zone
change.
We
went
to
a
b4
for
alcohol
before
it
used
to
be
a
b3
when
this
particular
restaurant
first
opened
up.
So
it
was
you
know
legal.
Then
they
changed
the
requirement
to
a
b4,
because
that
whole
area
was
having
issues
and
problems
with
parking
with.
I
think
it
was
the
neighbors
and
there
was
actually.
K
A
A
But
that
was
at
the
bar
that
wasn't
the
bar.
The
bar
was
in
another
close
section,
so
that
wasn't
it
that's
another
one.
This
has
been
a
restaurant
ever
since
it
opened
up
ever
since
it
was
built
ever
since
it
was
built,
but,
like
I
said
there
was
a
zone
change
done.
I
don't
recall
in
what
year
now,
but
that's
that's
what
transpired
with
the
liquor
licenses
and
it
was
done
intentionally
because
of
liquor
licenses
yeah
and
then
the
special
use
got
added
onto
this
thing
now
later
on.
After
that,.
L
A
Mean
it's
it's
like
I
said
we
were
just
going
through
answering
questions
on
how
the
formula
is
derived
and
stuff
like
that,
but
it's
a
little
extreme.
You
know
right
now.
You
know:
we've
gone
through
the
public
hearing.
Unless
you
have
something
to
add
that
we
have
not
discussed
I'm
getting
ready
to
entertain
a
motion.
It
was.
U
A
A
A
motion
sup
an
sup,
an
sup
right,
yes,
sgp,
I'm
sorry
all
right,
hrp
motion,
second
and
second,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
eyes
against
motion
carries.
The
next
item
is
amen
in
the
zone
in
the
map
of
the
city
loretta
by
rezoning,
the
north
76.5
feet
of
lot,
6
block
90
eastern
division
located
at
101
corpus
christi
from
r3
to
b3.
Q
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
The
owner
hobie
of
jesus
applicant
representative,
alfredo
guerra,
proposed
the
location,
is
north
76.5
feet
of
log
6
block
90
eastern
division
located
at
101
corpus
christi
street.
The
zone
change
request
is
an
r3
mixed
residential
district
to
b3
community
business
district
proposed
use
a
brick
shop
letter
sent
30
none
or
none
against
location
view
aerial
map
street
view.
Q
Zoning
map
future
land
use
map
stop
supports
the
proposed
zone
change.
The
proposed
b3
district
is
in
conformance
with
the
comprehensive
landing
destination
of
this
area.
As
the
neighborhood
mixed
use,
the
proposed
zoning
is
compatible
with
commercial
uses
and
the
area
the
proposed
zone
will
allow
for
users
already
present
already
present
in
the
business
in
the
vicinity
and
the
proposed
motion.
A
O
Q
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
The
owner,
shashi
vaswani
applicants,
llc
representative,
sharpie
engineering
location
lot,
1a
block
2,
lago,
denmark
del
mar
subdivision
unit
9a
located
at
7602
country
club,
drive
zone
change,
request,
r1b
single
family,
high
density,
residential
district
to
b4,
highway
commercial
district
proposed
use,
mini
storage,
warehousing
letter
sense,
3,
none
4,
none
4
against
location
view,
aerial
map
street
view,
zoning
map
future
land
use
map
staff
supports
the
proposed
zone.
Change
that
proposed
many
storage
warehousing
use
is
not
anticipated
to
negatively
negatively
affect
the
surrounding
area.
Q
S
B
A
V
Good
evening,
mr
chairman,
frank
estrada
with
surefie
engineering.
Yes,
we
are
in
favor
of
a
b1
zoning.
We
are
removing
the
request
for
the
b4,
the
reason
being
that
we
request
the
b4
is
because
the
anticipation
was
to
construct
or
build
a
mini
storage
facility,
which
you
need
to
build
in
a
b4.
But
after
talking
to
staff,
we
went
ahead
and
decided
we'd
go
down
to
b1
and
apply
for
an
sup
if
the
b1
goes
through.
V
A
Okay,
so
then
your
request
then,
is
to
to
go
from
from
a
b4
to
a
b1.
Yes,
sir
all
right
and
then
come
back
around
for
an
issue
and
then
come
back
for
a
special
abuse
permit.
After
that,
that's
correct,
correct!
Okay,
all
right!
This
is
a
public
hearing,
anybody
else
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
a
b-1.
Yes,
sir,
I'm
taking
favor
right
now,
just
right
now
I'll
call
you
right
now
all
right
anybody
else
who
wish
to
speak
in
favor
of
it
in
favor
of
it.
G
Okay
and
their
property
is
in
front
of
that
circle
street
we're
going
to
make
a
commercial
why
taxes
are
going
to
be
increased
again,
because
I
paid
25
000
taxes
every
year
on
my
day
care
and
their
babies
and
children,
and
inside
my
daycare
the
fire
department
she
went
out
in
there
they
painted
red
no
parking
fairly.
Why
is
the
one
on
7613
beat
lot
10
on
delmar
the
friska
restaurant
gets
all
the
employ
all
the
not
employees,
all
the
people
that
go
and
eat
it
fills
out
all
their
parking.
G
And
then
they
park
all
around
that
street
is
that's
dead
and
I've
called
the
police
about
a
hundred
times,
because
there's
a
lot
that
was
passed,
it
was
given
twenty
dollars
a
ticket
and
I
call
it
and
they
don't
go
so
I'm
against
this.
Okay,
okay,
all
right-
and
I
hope
everybody
will
hear
me-
vote
against
it
too,
because
the
property
tax
is
going
to
go
higher
and
higher
and
higher,
and
I
know
this
gentleman
used
to
be
a
friend
of
mine
because
I
work
for
the
city.
A
L
I
A
We
have
a
motion.
We
have
a
second.
All
those
apparent
emotions
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
goes
against.
Motion
carries
the
next
item
is
amended.
There's
only
an
ordinance
in
the
city
of
narrator
by
rezoning
lot,
17
block
two
varietal
town
center
phase,
two,
it's
located
at
50,
20
town
center
court
from
r2
to
b4
commercial.
Q
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
owner
shashi
biswani
applicant
a-a-r-t-I-l-o-c
representative
sheriff
jeffrey
engineering,
location
lot,
17
block
2,
laredo
town
center
phase,
2
located
at
50,
20
town
center
court
zone
change,
request,
r2,
multifamily
district
2b4,
highway
commercial
district
proposed
used
soccer
field,
offer
space
letter
sent
zero.
Six.
I'm
sorry,
four
is
none
against
nuns
location
view
aerial
map
street
view.
Q
F
B
V
That's
well
I'll,
let
me
just
I
don't
know
exactly
what's
going
in
there,
but
it's
a
small
area
where
they're
playing
and
putting
a
soccer
field
the
soccer
field
compared
to
they
actually
own
the
lot
in
front
and
back
the
one
that
it
is
in
front
of
this,
the
m1,
so
that
is
owned
by
the
same
by
the
same
owner.
At
this
point
in
time
they
wanted
to
move
forward
with
a
soccer
field
and
an
office
for
that
soccer
field.
V
There
is
a
plan
to
develop,
have
a
have
a
multi-development
hit
there
as
far
as
what
they're
planning
on
doing
they
couldn't
construct.
We
we
we
visited
with
staff.
We
were
attempting
to
build
the
the
soccer
field
and
the
office
without
having
to
change
the
zone
that
wasn't
possible.
So
he
had
to
look
at
the
overall
lots
and
say
we're
going
to
need
a
b4
eventually,
let's
just
change
it
once.
A
A
A
A
Q
Q
Q
Q
C
A
A
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
aye
aye,
all
right.
Those
against
emotion,
carries.
The
next
item
is
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
to
the
city
loretta
by
authorizing
the
issuance
of
a
special
use
permit
for
a
mini
storage
in
lot.
One
block
one
sunny
season
on
north
subdivision
phase,
eight
located
at
11,
I'm
sorry
11,
000,
110,
international
boulevard,.
W
Q
Zoning
map
future
land
use
map
staff
supports
the
proposed
sup.
The
proposed
use
incompatible
with
the
surrounding
existing
zones
and
uses
the
property
meets
the
land
development
code,
design
standard
for
many
storage
facilities,
requiring
that
said
facilities
be
located
no
less
than
350
from
a
major
arterial
as
identified
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
There
are
no
major
arterial
within
350
feet
for
the
location.
Q
W
S
A
A
Okay,
what
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission
motion
to
approve
second
motion
and
the
second?
All
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
goes
against.
Motion.
Carries
next
item
is
review
consideration
of
the
following
master
plans:
first,
item
7a
review
and
reconsideration
of
cuatro
denton's
north
subdivision
master
plan,
the
attendance,
residential
and
commercial.
J
J
N
O
A
J
A
A
L
X
X
X
X
X
X
That
does
take
away
a
portion
of
the
lock,
but
when
you
look
at
lot
number
eight
lot
number
eight
has
the
smallest
buildable
area
dimension,
which
is
a
48
by
40
feet,
and
we
do
have
a
table
on
the
left
side
that
pretty
much
describes
the
buildable
area.
The
smallest
we're
talking
is
a
1917
square
feet
which
could
could
a
one-story
building
can
be
configured
in
that
square
footage,
but
usually
the
intent
also
could
be
a
two-story
home
which
a
thousand
footprint
could
work.
Also.
W
O
X
Don't
know
if
that
was
conveyed
to
you.
What
I
could
speak
of.
We
do
know
with
the
amount
of
lots,
it's
low
density
and
we
don't
really
anticipate
a
heavy
traffic
load
from
from
from
this
five
acre,
usually
when,
when
traffic
there's
traffic
movement,
there's
lots
or
ownerships
that
pretty
much
move
at
different
times,
not
everybody
as
an
example,
but
nobody
not
everybody,
goes
at
7
30
to
to
work,
and
so
you
do
have
different
slots,
and
so,
when
he
comes
forward
22
a
lot
sweet,
we
anticipated
traveling.
W
A
Y
I'm
sorry,
my
name
for
the
record
is
garcia
and
I'm
the
proper
owner
of
8601
emily
right
on
the
corner
of
emily
and
sanjon
500
feet
away
from
where
the
proposed
entrance
to
this
neighborhood
is
is
being
proposed.
I
think
the
number
one
concern
is
that
it's
not
a
complete
street.
It's
only
partial,
it
doesn't
meet
700
square
feet.
There's
only
one
exit,
one
entrance
traffic
is
already
an
issue
as
it
is
so.
Traffic
and
safety
is
the
main
concern
in
in
this
purpose.
L
Y
Y
A
garage
and
that's
not
correct,
I
mean
I
live
there,
there's
only
one
sidewalk
and
people
walk.
I
mean
there's
people
in
that
neighborhood
that
go
out
and
exercise
there's
only
one
sidewalk,
the
other
side,
which
is
the
site
that
I
live
in
to
the
east.
There's
no
sidewalk,
so
people
park
on
the
street
on
both
sides
of
the
street,
so
it
makes
that
emily
drive
extremely
narrow.
Y
A
P
P
The
residents
of
volkswagen
subdivision
in
the
surrounding
area
are
against
the
planning
and
the
development
of
the
property
described
as
block
gate
oak
ridge
subdivision
located
at
150
south
of
kimberley
and
emily
drive.
I
know
this
because
I
started
a
petition
to
stop
the
approval
of
the
platinum,
which
I
have
here
as
well.
If
you
all
would
like
to
see
it
and
right
now,
somebody
is
gathering
more
signatures.
P
P
The
coroner
is
where
children
are
dropped
off
after
school
to
allow
more
cars
to
come
and
go
at
this
juncture
would
increase
the
possibility
of
car
related
fatalities
for
a
child
or
adults
waiting
for
their
child.
Our
area
is
already
crowded
from
narrow
streets,
which
makes
it
which
makes
it
a
challenge
to
find
parking.
Should
you
own
more
than
two
vehicles
or
have
visitors?
P
The
entrance
would
would
disturb
existing
residents
and
it
is
right
between
their
houses
again
making
accidents
more
possible
residents
of
this
area
and
surrounding
areas
enjoy
riding
their
bikes
and
walking
in
this
area
again
putting
them
at
risk
due
to
added
traffic.
The
quality
of
life
would
diminish
as
more
resolution
cause,
more
crowding
and
more
noise
pollution.
P
P
On
top
of
all
this,
the
residents
of
oakridge
and
the
surrounding
areas
know
all
too
well
that
taxes
tax
increases
would
come
would
be
coming,
should
more
homes
be
built.
This
again
would
take
connects
to
the
quality
of
life
of
the
residents
of
this
area,
as
they
would
have
to
pay
more
for
their
homes
and
worse.
During
this
time
of
economic
difficulty,
it
is
not
right
that
they
pay
more
for
a
lifetime
selena
developer.
The
developer
can
make
a
few
more
million
dollars
as
of
10
16
21.
P
After
speaking
to
legal
counsel,
we
organized
the
petition
to
stop
approval
of
this
item.
It
is
the
wishes
of
the
residents
of
oakridge
subdivision
that
city
loreto
deny
the
building
denied
building
in
this
space
or
build
a
park.
Instead,
there
is
even
a
resident
who
may
like
to
contribute
to
this
effort.
Furthermore,
we
do
not.
We
do
not
want
any
council
member
attaching
their
name
to
this.
To
this,
pretending
that
that
they're
doing
this
for
the
residents
this
park
is
being
proposed
by
the
residents
of
the
area
for
the
residents
of
that
area.
P
They
may
help
out,
but
we
do
not
want
them
taking
credit
for
something
that
we
proposed.
As
a
former
city
of
the
radio
employee,
I
know
that
there's
money
budgeted
to
complete
such
projects.
There
are
community
block
development
grants
and
the
parks
and
recreation
department
has
an
estimated
budget
of
20
million
and
council
members
have
a
pool
of
6.4
million.
When
I
was
last
employed.
P
The
people
who
live
and
work
in
laredo
also
want
a
better
life,
a
better
life
from
contaminated
water,
misuse
of
taxpayer
money
and
real
quality
of
life
projects
and
better
jobs.
Oak
ridge
subdivision
deserves
better
and
laredo
deserves
better.
So
we
oppose
this,
and
if
you
like,
I
can
show
you
the
signatures
as
well.
A
I
I
strongly
feel
that
by
developing
that
area
is
not
only
going
to
create
an
outlet
for
the
water
that
is,
that
is
stagnant
there,
but
also
it
will
create
a
a
closing
for
that.
For
that
area
to
be
completely
developed,
that's
the
only
section
that
has
not
been
developed,
so
I
I
would.
I
would
make
a
motion
to
approve
and
and
also
approve
the
variants
that
are
being
requested
here.
O
O
A
All
right,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
signified
by
saying
aye
aye,
those
against
motion
carriers.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
the
consideration
of
the
following
preliminary
pledge
and
preliminary
replies
item
nine,
a
preliminary
consideration
of
the
replay
of
lot
five
block:
two
san
diego
business
park,
partner,
interlock,
5a
block
2
san
diego
business
part,
the
intense
commercial
speaker.
J
I
Z
We
are
in
favor,
or
we
agree
with
planning
comments,
however,
not
so
much
a
lot
of
clarity
under
safety
or
traffic
safety.
So
the
purpose
of
this
re-flat
is
only
and
solely
to
scoot
a
drainage
easement
located
at
the
southwest
corner
of
the
lot
further.
I'm
sorry
at
the
southeast
part
of
the
lot
further
east,
that's
it
there's
a
warehouse
being
proposed
and
that
easement
is
in
the
way.
Z
Z
It's
an
m1
lot
and
then
the
one
where
I'm
a
little
confused
is
show
a
master
plan,
a
master
plan.
What
normally
a
master
plan
is
for
an
unplanned
lot
or
an
unplanned
tract,
that's
going
to
become
a
subdivision,
and
you
should
and
in
phases-
and
you
want
to
make
it
into
you're,
going
to
show
that
it's
going
to
be
master
planned
out
number
two
present
a
plan
showing
all
existing
and
future
drivers
in
the
commercial
area
show
access
and
defense.
Z
So
there
is
a
side
planner
in
place
and
we
can
show
what's
being
proposed
to
to
the
department.
However,
it's
an
empty
lot
there's
nothing.
There
number
three
show
internal
access
easement
at
the
southwest
corner,
there
isn't
a
15
by
25
internal
access,
easements
we're
proposing
to
get
rid
of
it
or
to
discard
it,
because
I
replied
that
lots
next
to
that
right
before
I
eliminated
those
internal
exercises,
so
this
one
would
serve
an
old
purpose
and
then
number
four
coordinate,
driveway
location
with
tech
stop
and
traffic
director.
Z
K
Z
Right
so-
and-
and
I
didn't
want
to
mention
this
because
mr
danny
mcgee's
not
here-
but
I
did
speak
to
him-
and
he
says
you
know
what
he
said-
it's
a
little
late
to
strike
out
now,
but
I
just
didn't
want
to
bring
him
up
since
no
one's
here
from
traffic
to
speak.
But
I
just
don't
want
this
to
be
following
the
process
when
it
kind
of
doesn't
make
sense
with.
I
Which
is
the
idols
some
of
the
some
of
the
comments
of
traffic
safety
includes
its
they're
very
they're,
very
common
you're,
going
to
be
able
to
see
them
on
all
of
them.
So
I
understand
exactly
what
you're
saying
so,
why
don't
you
tell
us,
which
is
the
items
that
that
you
don't
that
you
want
to
remove?
Z
Z
Ultimately,
yes,
because
number
one:
how
will
that
commercial
area
develop
again?
We
can
show
the
existing
or
the
proposed
site
plan.
Not
a
problem
show
a
master
plan
kind
of
a
problem.
I'm
not
too
sure
what
you
don't
know.
Okay,
you
don't
need
that
one
again
number
two
presenting
a
plan
showing
all
the
existing
future
drivers
in
the
commercial
area.
Well,
there
aren't
right
now
we
can
show
what
we're
going
to
propose,
but
that's
going
to
be
a
construction
at
the
end
of
the
day.
I
L
A
I
A
J
J
AA
A
Any
questions
from
the
engineer
we
should
come
at
you.
No,
what
are
the
wishes
and
staff
of
the
sorry
the
commission
motion
to
approve?
We
have
motion
in
a
second
all,
those
in
favor.
All
right,
all
right
goes
against.
Motion
carries
thank
you.
Next,
preliminary
consideration
of
the
planet
vientos
north
phase
16
in
tennis,
residential.
J
N
A
J
AB
Sir
good
evening,
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
commission,
ricardo
yarriel,
with
top
site
civil
group
representing
the
client
that
is
correct.
I'm
glad
that
letter
got
to
you
all,
probably
wasted
a
little
bit
of
a
little
bit
of
printing
here,
but
in
case
you
all
need
one.
We
are
requesting
the
variance
the
length
of
the
block.
In
addition
to
what's
already
there
what's
already
constructed
on
latigos
exceeds
the
500..
It's
a
roughly
about
610
feet
from
center
line
and
center
line.
Let.
A
A
AB
A
AB
AB
AB
Detention,
it'll
probably
be
lot
12.
12..
Yes,
so
that's
where
everything
it
goes
to
the
northeast,
but
just
so
that
we
don't
get
confused.
The
variance
is
just
for
the
street
land
right.
We
will
be
complying
with
the
24
lock.
Okay,
the
other
comment
I
don't
want
to
make
too
much
of
it,
but
I
know
traffic
has
there.
No
block
length
shall
be
less
than
300
feet
again.
We
are
above
300.
I
just
want
to
say
that
for
the
record,
do
you
want
that
remove
it
could
be
removed.
A
A
The
next
item
is
preliminary
plaque
approval
of
the
reflex
of
lot,
one
block,
1
501
imperial
partners,
manila
subdivision
into
northeast
residential
subdivision
and
the
granting
of
barbarians
to
allow
a
dead
end
street
to
exceed
the
500
foot
maximum
threshold
and
to
the
exceed
the
maximum
number
of
lots
permitted
on
dead
end
street.
Pursuant
to
section
3-2
jay
of
the
subdivision
ordinance
the
antennas
residential.
J
A
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
We
can
get
one
more
unit
like
that
and
just
to
finalize
we
are
a
little
above
the
also
the
the
count
for
the
for
the
lots
we
have
27
instead
of
24,
and
I
think
for
fire
department
is
28,
so
we're
we're
below
the
threshold
for
the
fire,
and
we
just
wanted
to
to
request
your.
You
know
that
you
approve
these
variants
and
and
maybe
we
could
scratch
the
comment
number
one.
A
Okay,
so
basically
your
replay
is
changing.
Really
the
use
is
going
from
multi-family
to
single
family
lots,
correct,
correct
and
you're
down,
you're
dropping
the
number
of
dwellings
from
260
to
about
90
92,
and
we
already
have
an
approved
plaque.
So
the
replant
is
just
basically
a
change
of
the
use
of
what
you
had
so.
L
A
I
mean
you
want
to
put
up
the
plaque
yeah.
Can
you
go
back?
Please
there
you
go.
This
is
a
plant
now
you
do
have
constraints
in
this
area
and
that's
that's.
Why
he's
asking
for
some
variances
there's
a
big
creek
back
there,
where
you
really
can't
do
much
more.
You
know
he's
kind
of
constrained
by
what
he
can
develop.
A
I
A
A
To
care
and
it's
all
contingent
on
the
same
thing,
you
know
we
were
at
one
time
trying
to
get
a.
I
know
we're
trying
to
get
it
out.
They
go
back
up
to
west
to
the
west,
because
you
remember
many
other
guys
about
two
three
years
ago
yesterday
that
didn't
there
was
another
issue,
but
that
was
a
big
issue
and
so
yeah.
That's
why
that
particular
fire
exit
was
created
to
to
be
able
to
provide
necessary,
ingress
and
egress
for
fire.
I.
M
Why
we
were
recommending?
That
is
because
we
spoke
to
the
engineer.
He
mentioned
that
that
caliche
road,
the
part
of
the
fire,
call
only
requires
an
all-weather
road
so
technically
by
putting
that
he
meets
it,
but
the
only
concern
we
had
was
they're,
giving
it
a
one-year
warranty
and
then
he
basically
let
us
know
that
after
that
one
year
the
city
would
be
responsible
for
maintaining
that
caliche
road.
The
only
concern
we
had
is
that,
as
time
goes,
that
road
will
deteriorate
faster
than
asphalt,
look
and
the
city
would
be
responsible
for
maintaining
it.
A
Okay,
don't
make
sense,
I
mean
what
you're
saying
and
I
think
especially
for
people
who
are
going
to
you
know
purchase.
Obviously
you
would
want
to
have
you
know
and
that
have
issues
like
well.
There's
huge
holes
right
yeah,
so
we'll
tell
whether
which
really
doesn't
happen,
but
you
never
know
okay,
but
yeah.
Okay,
any
other
questions
for
the
engineer.
I
Motion,
yes,
sir,
go
ahead
I'll,
make
a
motion
to
approve
and
to
strike
comment
number
one
from
planning
and
and
just
to
make
a
a
comment
that
it
was
a
recommendation
by
fire.
So
it's
up
to
you
if
you
want
to
put
asphalt
or
leave
it
on
I'll,
say
with
a
rope:
okay,
okay
and
I'll:
go
ahead
and
grant
to
grant
the
variances.
Mr
chairman,
all
right,
another
question.