►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 090122
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 090122
A
All
right,
well,
I
know
there's
there's
a
commissioner,
you
move
to.
Excuse
me:
oh,
we
can't
because
we're
in
our
name
yeah.
We
can't
take
action.
So
there's
nothing.
We
can
do
about
this,
we'll
wait
until
she
comes.
We
can
do
the
next
item
pledge
of
allegiance,
so
everybody
can
stand
up.
B
So,
mr
chairman,
we
posted
on
our
agenda
a
presentation
by
txdot
that
does
not
require
action.
It's
just
a
presentation
and
speaking
to
our
legal,
they
seem
to.
They
say
that
it's
okay.
If
you
would
like
to
just
move
that
up
and
then
we
could
just
have
the
presentation
right
now,
while
we're
waiting
for
one
of
our
commissioners.
C
C
All
right
good
evening,
thank
you
all
for
the
invitation.
I
did
receive
your
invitation
and
listening
to
you
all's
last
meeting.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
here
to
talk
about
the
upcoming
projects
that
txdot
has
planned.
I
do
have
some
slides
put
together,
they're
going
to
go
through
what
we
have
planned
for
the
next
10
years,
but
I'll
try
to
keep
it
specific
to
mainly
to
laredo
for
this
meeting
and
then,
if
you
have
any
follow-up
questions
either
during
the
presentation
or
after
I'd
be
more
than
happy
to
answer
those.
C
So
I
just
wanted
to
start
off
really
quick
just
to
give
everyone
that
may
not
know
a
loreto
district
does
comprise
of
eight
counties
right,
so
we
don't
only
oversee
laredo.
I
know
we're
called
the
texas
district,
but
we
also
have
to
oversee
the
rio
eagle
pass
laredo,
which
are
major
areas
that
includes
overseeing
the
eight
international
border
crossings
that
reside
in
those
areas
as
well.
You
know
that's
just
some
brief
information.
You
know
the
population
of
over
40
or
40
thousand
majority.
That
obviously
is
here
in
narrato.
C
So
what
I
want
to
start
off
here
is
just
to
kind
of
set
the
base
for
so
you
guys
start
seeing
the
prize
that
are
funded.
Laredo
is
in
a
unique
position
throughout
the
state.
You
know
being
that
we're
a
major
freight.
You
know
network
corridor
here,
a
border,
a
city.
We
have
four
major
corridors
and
one
major
destination,
so
everyone
is
familiar
with
ih35.
C
Everyone
is
familiar
with
I-69
already
at
least
a
portion,
that's
built
from
the
international,
the
world
trade
bridge
to
I-35.
C
I
don't
know
how
many
of
you
are
familiar
with
the
the
destination
that
recently
got
called
up
by
the
governor
I-27,
so
that'll
take
usa,
three,
which
is
in
laredo
as
well
as
us-277,
that
heads
up
between
evil
passenger
rio
that'll,
take
it
to
interstate
I-27
and
then
i2,
that
is
interstate
2.
That
will
connect
us
down
with
our
our
partners
out
in
the
south
in
the
valley,
so
that
will
also
connect
on
portions
of
our
usa3,
our
our
southern
loop,
that
we
have
called
that
invention.
A
Let
me
ask
you:
what
you're
talking
about
interstate
would
be?
83
will
be
coming
to
state
2
on
the
loop
all
the
way
down
south
to
the
valley,
correct
right.
C
Thank
you
and
again
the
logistics
of
those
as
far
as
where
we
spur
out
and
interchanges
those
obviously
we're
in
the
planning
stages
of
that.
But
yes,
that
that
is
the
idea.
Yes,
so
right
now,
laredo
right
now
in
the
loreto
district,
as
I
mentioned
over
eight
counties,
we
have
593
million
dollars
of
projects
under
construction.
That's
active
construction
booths
on
the
ground,
378
million
of
that
is
in
laredo
and
webb
county
alone.
So
you
can
see
the
percentage
right.
The
vast
amount
goes
to
laredo.
C
But
again,
if
you
look
at
the
population
basis,
the
majority
of
population
and
the
traffic
is
here
is
here
in
the
rail
two
other
projects
here
that
are
currently
under
construction.
Major
projects
is
I-69
corridor,
we're
adding
a
lane
in
each
direction,
twice:
69,
east
and
west.
That
will
help
in
conjunction
with
our
partnership
with
the
city,
where
they're
doing
the
toll
booth
project
at
the
international
bridge.
They
recite
cbi
funds
that
the
state
is
overseeing
so
that
project
will
help
ease.
C
C
We
are
going
bringing
a
brand
new
overpass
over
the
union,
pacific
railroad,
just
north
of
shiloh
and
we're
also
building
two
direct
connectors
that
will
help
get
you
from
east
I-69
to
south
ih-35
and
west
I-69
to
south
I-35
and
we're
also
adding
a
lane
to
I-35
as
well.
So
in
that
area.
Previously,
you
had
two
lanes
in
each
direction:
north
and
south
you're
going
to
have
three
lanes
now
in
each
direction,
north
and
south,
and
that
is
part
of
an
initiative
that
we
have
throughout
the
state.
C
C
So
continuing
so
again
that
is
what's
under
construction
now,
what
do
we
have
in
the
future,
which
is,
I
think,
was
really
the
reason
why
you
all?
You
asked
us
to
come
up
here
yesterday.
We
just
got
signed
into
effect
the
2023
unified
transportation
plan.
So
for
those
of
you
that
are
not
aware
the
way
texas
operates,
we
operate
in
a
10-year
planning
window
so
that
10-year
unified
transportation
plan
allocates
all
the
funds
that
we
have
designated
throughout
the
state.
Their
destiny
told
our
projects.
C
Basically,
what
that
unified
transportation
plan
highlights
is
our
major
mobility
funds
that
are
on
there
and
I'm
gonna
talk
about
some
of
the
projects
here
in
laredo
that
that
have
already
received
those
funds.
So
again,
if
you
look
at
it
in
laredo
alone,
1.7
billion
dollars
for
the
next
10
years
in
the
in
the
redo
district.
Now
that
is
an
all-time
high
for
the
loyola
district.
C
So
what
I'm
going
to
show
you
again?
This
is
just
a
disclaimer.
Obviously
we're
going
to
show
you
lead
dates.
We're
going
to
show
you
construction
estimates
all
these
are
always
subject
to
revision.
Obviously
we
understand
the
dynamic
environment.
We
want
the
economy
right,
so
these
are
our
projections
and
what
we're
planning
towards,
but
again
they
are
always
subject
to
revision.
C
So
the
major
project
that
we
have,
I
know
that
we
feels
like
we've
been
talking
about
this
project
forever,
is
the
us59
future
I-69
corridor?
So
this
project
is
taking
loop,
20
right,
which
everybody
knows
it's
it's
us59
as
well,
going
to
take
it
to
interstate
standards.
What
is
what
does
that
mean?
That
means
you're
going
to
have
main
lanes
on
the
in
the
middle
right
three
lanes
in
each
direction.
C
You're
gonna
have
three
lanes
of
furnish
road
in
each
direction,
so
in
total,
you're
gonna
have
12
lanes
at
a
minimum
along
that
whole
entire
corridor.
Right,
look
at
lou
410
in
san
antonio
and
that's
what
us59
loop
20
is
going
to
look
like.
C
We
do
have
the
project
funded
so
for
august
2023,
which
is
you
know,
just
around
the
corner,
we're
going
to
be
letting
the
overpasses
at
shiloh
del
mar
university
and
we
are
in
the
process
of
accelerating
jackman
as
well,
so
we'll
be
letting
those
who
are
interchanges,
as
well
as
all
the
furniture
holds
and
everything
that
that
accompanies
us,
we're
in
the
final
process
right
now
of
acquiring
the
right-of-way.
C
So
that
project
is
on
schedule
to
let
in
august
and
then,
as
you
see,
the
last
project
that
that
will
bring
up
the
talent
is
the
last
part
at
airport
there
that
will
complete
the
last.
The
last
interchange
there
it's
a
year
from
now,
yes,
sir,
so
in
addition
to
that,
we
just
put
that
number
up
there,
because
in
addition
to
that,
almost
300
million
dollars
in
construction
we're
also
spending
almost
another
200
million
dollars
in
right-of-way
costs
as
well
along
that
area.
C
So
the
other
major
projects
that
are
funded
again,
these
products
are
funded
and
programmed
is
we
have
a
bridge
replacement
and
widening
to
six
lanes
at
the
universal
interchange?
That's
a
mile
marker
18
at
unitec
right.
Everyone
understands
the
congestion,
that's
good
that
goes
on
there,
so
that
project
is
not
only
going
to
replace
that
existing
overpass
we're
going
to
widen
unibroil
underneath
right.
That
goes
east
and
west.
C
We're
going
to
widen
that
to
eight
lanes
and
we're
going
to
build
a
brand
new
interchange,
a
mile
and
a
half
north
of
there,
where
you're
going
to
see
where
the
future
of
char
rootenger
relief
route-
and
that
is
a
relief
right
now,
I'm
using
that
word
specific.
It's
a
relief
route,
that's
going
to
have
controlled
access
and
I'll
show
you
that
that's
going
to
be
an
interchange,
that's
going
to
connect
that
area,
hopefully
provide
relief
for
that
air
as
well
as
it
continues
to
expand
and
grow
up.
C
We
have
the
direct
connectors
three
and
six.
So
if
you
look
at
that,
I
use
the
word
spaghetti
bowl,
because
somebody
said
the
other
day
and
it
just
sounds
cool
right.
That's
spaghetti
both
i35
and
nuke
20.!
You
see
all
those
direct
connectors
we
have
there.
We
currently
have
three
build
we're
in
the
process
of
building
two
more
that
I
just
mentioned
earlier.
That
will
give
us
five.
C
There's
eight
in
total,
these
are
the
two
that
are
funded
and
then
there's
one
that
it's
currently
not
funded.
So
that's
those
two
that
will
take
you
north
and
south
I-35
to
east
59,
that's
35
million,
and
then
the
last
one
that's
currently
funded
here
on
35
is
the
bridge
replacement
and
widening
to
six
lanes
at
the
union,
pacific,
railroad
and
mine
marker
18..
So
that
is
where
the
old
at
toursboro
center
is
right.
Now
you
have
to
go
to
that
little
s,
curve
right
and
go
down
around
that
overpass.
C
We're
gonna,
relocate
that
overpass
to
the
north
west
and
we're
gonna
go
over
the
railroad
instead
of
under
that
current,
under
where
you
pass
that
will
get
filled
up
and
that
will
no
longer
exist,
we'll
remove
and
obliterate
that
and
we're
also
working
on
connectivity
to
us
83
as
well.
So
that'll
include
a
direct
connector
that'll.
Take
you
from
if
you're
traveling
north
on
35
and
you
want
to
go
north
on
83
you'll
no
longer
have
to
get
off
an
intersecting
underneath
you'll
have
a
direct
connector
that'll.
Take
you
directly
to
it.
C
A
C
So
if
you
look
at
that
unitec
to
a
char
route
destroying
north,
you
can
help
me
out
with
the
distance
between
there,
because
you
have
the
ending
intersection.
Then
you
have
another
from
a.
A
C
So
if
you
look
at
that,
what
we're
doing,
obviously,
we
actually
just
had
to
meet
one
of
our
consultants,
so
we
have
a
schematic
where
we're
analyzing
the
entire
I-35
corridor.
Right
all
the
way
up
to
my
marker,
30
and
we're
looking
at
those
kind
of
you
know,
issues
capacity
issues.
How
are
we
going
to
service
right
trying
to
service
all
this?
Not
only
development
is
there,
but
upcoming
development.
C
That's
going
to
be
in
the
future,
so
just
to
kind
of
answer
your
question
I'll
take
a
quick
step
back,
but
if
you
look
at
that
interchange
that
interchange
eventually
is
going
to
look
like
what
is
35
and
i69
looks
like
so
that
interchange
we're
building
we're
not
building
a
simple
interchange.
Like
you
said,
you
know,
our
carrier
we're
building
a
full-blown
right.
Interchange,
that's
going
to
connect
basically
to
interstates,
is
what
we're
looking
at
there.
So
getting
the
traffic
there.
You
know
that
is
challenging.
C
I
will
tell
you
in
some
areas
because
of
the
close
proximity
of
carriers
and
uniroyal
right.
We
were
actually
just
looking
at
that
earlier
today,
so
I
will
take
this
opportunity
to
mention
that
you
know
we
have
discussed
it
at
the
mpo
policy
committee
about
trying
to
find
routes.
You
know
other
relief
routes,
how
we
can
access
35,
because
if
we
continue
to
develop-
and
the
only
way
is
your
unit,
oil
or
carriers
is
going
to
be
really
difficult
to
get
all
that
traffic
through
there
we
were
looking
at
that.
C
You
know
we
were
partnering
with
the
city.
You
know
I
think
we've
done
trying
to
do
at
least
a
better
job
of
of
looking
at
what
the
city's
master
third
floor
plan
looks
like
what
our
turfer
plan
looks
like
to
to
make
sure
that
they
align
with
what
we're
doing
our
goal
of
this
meeting
is
to
show
you
you
know
this
is
where
the
money's
at
for
the
next
10
years.
If
we
can
align
that
with
everyone
else's
goals,
you
know
and
follow
where
the
money
is.
I
think
we
can
start
solving.
C
You
know
some
of
the
problems
we
have
so
thank
you
yeah.
So
going
back
to
this
I-35,
like
I
just
mentioned-
and
you
mentioned
the
achar
ruth
injured
parkway,
this
is
a
project
that
again
is
being
funded
through
the
mpo
with
category
seven
dollars.
Texas
has
taken
this
over
and
is
this
finishing
the
design
and
environmental
clearance
and
house.
This
is
a
51
million
dollar
project
that
is
funded
and
it's
going
to
be
a
true
relief
route
between
mind
your
own
35
and-
and
I
want
to
clarify
what
that
means.
C
A
relief
route
is
a
route
that
has
controlled
access
right,
I'll,
come
up
here
and
I'll.
Tell
you.
I
know
that
that
I
don't
think
the
guys
in
the
back
are
going
to
like
me
very
much
when
I
say
this
right.
I
know
everybody
wants
to
have
access
to
the
highway,
but
the
highways
are
meant
to
move.
You
know
people
in
goods
back
and
forth,
so
we
need
to
be
strategic
and
where
we
allow
those
connection
points,
we
try
to
do
a
better
job.
C
C
If
you
will
do
the
same,
then
we
can
help
plan
right.
What
we're
doing-
and
this
is
our
intent
right-
we
want
to
be
transparent
as
transparent
as
possible
with
the
public,
so
you
can
see
what
we're
doing
so.
This
project.
I
mentioned
that
because
it's
a
it's
a
relief
route
that
will
have
controlled
access,
so
it'll
have
crossovers
that'll
that'll,
carry
the
primary
access
points
along
there
and
then
there'll
be
strategic
locations
throughout
there.
C
That
will
have
access
as
well,
but
again
it's
meant
as
a
relief
route
to
move
traffic
back
and
forth
in
comparison
to
you
know
just
a
regular
five-lane,
undivided
roadway
that
has
access
points
all
over
the
place,
a
left.
Turning
in
the
middle
there's
a
lot
of
conflicts,
and
you
really
aren't
going
to
get
traffic
moving,
it's
more
traffic
generated.
So
just
wanted
to
point.
C
When
did
you
propose
to
let
that
so
that
project
is
already
funded
fully
funded
and
it's
going
to
be
leading
in
august
of
2023,
so
I
guess
for
our
numbers:
it
was
fully
funded
as
of
today.
This
is
september.
1St
is
the
beginning
of
rfy
calendar
year,
so
we're
waiting
for
that
basically
clock
to
strike
to
to
get
the
funds
from
this
year,
so
we're
on
top
to
let
it
in
august
3rd.
So
let
me.
C
So
that
is
something
you
know.
That's
a
good
question
right,
something
we've
always
looked
at
and
I
will
tell
you
that
it's
not
an
easy
solution.
It's
something
that
the
chokepoint
and
I'll
speak
here
on
behalf
of
texas,
and
this
is
based
off
numbers
and
what
we've
seen.
Everybody
know
that
the
chokepoint
is
kennel.
C
If
you
look
at
the
numbers,
if
you
look
at
where
the
traffic
backs
up
everything
back
to
the
kingdom,
so
what
are
we
doing?
We
currently
have
a
project
under
construction.
That's
adding
a
right
turn
lane
from
big
bend,
which
is
just
south
of
I-69
right
on
mines,
road
all
the
way
to
kingdom
that
lane
is
going
to
be
a
continuous
right
turn
lane
that's
going
to
allow
access
not
only
to
milo
road
if
you're
heading
north,
but
also
to
kenner,
so
that's
going
to
provide
free
access
in
there.
C
We're
also
adding
a
right
turn
lane
on
kilim,
so
killum.
If
you're
coming
out
going
to
the
west
you're
going
to
have
now
a
free
right
turn
to
go
out
once
that
project
is
completed,
you're
going
to
see
traffic
moving
through
there
a
little
bit
smoother,
but
there's
going
to
be
other
projects
that
we're
going
to
have
to
continue
and
follow
up
with
to
improve
the
operations.
I
guess
at
that
area
because
right
now,
kilim
is
that
choke
point?
That's
a
curry!.
C
We
we
have
looked
at
that.
I
will
say
that
if
you
look
at
the
north
london
traffic
study,
actually
the
rma
did
and
http
did.
That
was
one
of
their
suggestions
that
they
had
on
there.
I
will
tell
you
there's
challenges
when
you
start
considering
a
freeway
and
one
of
the
things
is
lack
of
access
right.
C
You
know
I-69
come
down
to
tie-in
before
you
get
to
the
bridge,
but
I
will
follow
up
with
the
solution
that
we
are
looking
at
or
the
alternatives
we're
looking
at
is.
How
can
we
get
other
access
points
to
the
bridge
right?
Because,
right
now
the
only
access
point
to
get
to
the
bridge
is
mine's
road
tie
69
right.
So
how
do
we
look
for
other
ones?
So
again,
we've
been
talking
to
mr
navarro
here
and
mr
mr
racer.
Behind
me
is
our
planning
director
we're
looking
at
options.
C
We
are
going
to
reach
out
to
the
to
the
people
in
the
area
right
and
find
out
what
are
the
solutions
or
what
are
other
alternatives
that
we
have
to
again
to
create
those
other
access
points,
because
there
has
to
be
access
points.
I
started
off
the
meeting
with
that
right.
C
We
continue
to
develop,
but
mine's
road
is
the
only
way
to
get
to
the
bridge,
I'm
going
to
throw
out
something
here
and
it's
an
idea
that
not
a
lot
of
people
are
talking
about,
but
I'm
going
to
mention
it
because
it
was
mentioned
in
and
again
that
north
radio
traffic
study
that
I
mentioned,
that
hntb
did
with
the
rma,
and
it's
been
looked
at
by
one
of
our
consultants
that
I
mentioned
earlier
when
we
looked
at
ih35
is
if
kilum
is
the
chokepoint
right
and
there's
only
one
way
in
and
out
of
kingdom
we
have
a
bridge
on
I-35
at
three
seconds
that
was
built.
C
Hilum
currently
does
not
align
with
it.
If
kilim
were
to
align
with
that
bridge,
everybody
could
come
down
I-69,
that's
actually
the
bridge
could
come
down
the
direct
connector
we
could
potentially
and
I'm
going
to
use
the
word
potential
right.
We
have
it
in
the
plans.
It's
not
funded
yet
build
an
off
ramp
from
that
direct
connector.
Coming.
A
Still
got
the
the
issue
of
the
bridge.
You're
I
mean
most
of
your
transportation
is
going
back
and
forth
across
that
bridge
right.
So
really
you
still
got
the
same
issue.
I
mean
you
can
try
to
cue
traffic
all
around,
but
we're
still
going
back
to
the
same.
You
know
we
only
have
one
bridge
and
right
now,
like
you
said
that
seems
to
be
the
area
where
your
choke
point
is
kill.
A
A
That's
going
to
obviously
add
more
and
more
traffic,
and
that
being
said,
then,
really
you
mentioned
that
you
need
to
look
for
relief
of
a
choke
point,
and
it
appears
to
me
that
the
only
relief
is
kind
of
like
what
you
said
that
you
wanted
to
do
with
the
char
boothenger
road,
making
a
controlled
road
with
you
know
and-
and
that
would
to
me-
make
a
lot
of
sense
for
the
transportation
industry
that
just
have
a
controlled.
A
C
So
we
are
doing
it.
Mrs
rodriguez
has
something
planned,
so
we
are
going
to
be
looking
again,
and
this
is
compound
I
mean
I
think
everyone
knows
that
we've
been
looking
at
1472
for
a
very
long
time.
The
improvements
that
we're
currently
making
are
are
going
to
be
improvements
that
aren't
going
to
help
but
they're
they're.
We
all
know
that
again
the
long-term
solution
we
need
to.
We
need
to
have
something
bigger
than
that
right,
so
we
are
bringing
a
consultant
on
board
to
look
at
the
long-term
solutions.
You
mentioned
they're
free
right.
C
Currently,
if
you
look
at
the
footprint
of
what
we
have
on
mines,
road
between
I-69,
all
the
way
to
pan-american
right
right
right,
I
mean
it's
very
limited
in
a
lot
of
areas
in
order
to
do
the
work,
if
you
would
look
at
the
costs
that
will
be
required
to
add
a
freeway
to
there,
you'll
be
talking
about
probably
buying
out
a
lot
of
those
businesses
in
a
lot
of
those
areas.
So
again,
there's
challenge
through
that.
C
That
doesn't
mean
that
we
can't
look
at
those,
but
we
are
going
to
start
exploring
the
option
that
maybe
at
one
point
along
1472
we
we
can
start
kind
of
a
freeway
point
at
one
point.
It's
just
right
now
in
that
current
area,
where
all
the
issues
are
is
because
it's
it's
really
over
developed
and
again
there's
only
one
access
point
and
everyone's
trying
to
get
to
it
at
the
same
time.
So.
C
No,
you
brought
up
a
good
point,
so
riverbank
is
there.
Obviously
that
is
not
a
textile
roadway,
so
obviously
I
I
cannot
speak
to
the
improvements
that
go
on
there,
but
I
know
at
the
city
and
at
the
mpo
level
we
have
discussed.
You
know
what
that
route
looks
like.
There
are
some
ideas
already
just
about
here
that
we
need
to
discuss
in
here
pretty
soon
about
maybe
other
access
points,
a
long
river
bank
that
maybe
can
connect
potentially
to
get
access
to
the
bridge.
E
D
F
C
Yes-
and
you
know
you
bring
up
a
good
point,
what
I'm
trying
to
show
up
here
is
right
is
obviously
there's
a
lot
of
money
invested.
Obviously
it's
it's
never
enough
right
because,
like
you
said,
the
development
is
worth
more
than
the
money.
The
hope
is
that
we
find
those
alternate
routes,
and
I
think
you
all
I
mean
I
think
the
city
has
a
great
opportunity
and
and
and
texas
will
help
be
partners
with
that
of
trying
to
find.
C
You
know
we're
all
for
new
development,
but
there
needs
to
be
other
routes
other
than
just
saying.
You
know
what
I'm
going
to
connect
to
a
texas
roadway
and
we're
going
to
call
it
good.
I
think
I
heard
someone
I
think,
mr
brad,
you
meant
you
said
at
the
last
meeting
that
I
heard
you
talked
about
circulation
right,
yeah,
that's
fine!
How
are
we
going
to
get
around?
Are
we
going
to
circulate
trafficking?
Yes,
we
need
to.
We
need
to
think
about
it.
It's
not
just
how
we're
going
to
get
it
out.
C
How
are
we
going
to
circulate?
How
are
you
going
to
move
it
yeah
so
who
does
that
fall
on
most
of
you,
yeah.
B
Yeah
well
just
to
let
you
know
about
river
road,
the
rma
is
funding
the
study
that
the
mto
is
putting
together
so
that
we
could
we
can
put
together
the
alignment
and
how
much
it's
going
to
cost.
So
that's
already
been
done
and
they're
moving
on
that
we
recently
today
we
had
a
meeting
with
landowners
to
start
talking
about
the
commitment
to
to
giving
us
the
right
of
way
so
that
we
can
get
river
road.
You
know
sooner
than
later,
so
that
that
is
in
the
works.
Okay,.
C
So
I
got
a
couple
more
slides
here.
I
know:
okay,
I've.
C
Just
to
wrap
it
up
and
sh359
also
is
a
price
that
is
funded
again.
This
is
part
of
that
1.7
billion
dollars
that
I
mentioned
funded
it's
an
18
million
dollar
project,
so
that
is
going
to
expand
it
to
a
five
lane
and
a
divided
highway,
and
that
project
is
four
miles
east
of
the
loop
to
ten
miles
east.
It's
a
six
mile
project.
C
If
you
can
see
up
on
the
screen,
you
see
that
that
green
corridor,
that's
all
the
way
up
to
255
in
the
north,
and
it
comes
down
to
where
it
says
future
bridge
4
5
should
put
their
potential
right.
That
is
a
a
quarter.
That's
going
to
help
connect
that
in
the
future.
So
to
the
to
those
ends.
We
are
also
looking
at
the
the
capacity
and
the
growth
of
you
know
the
world
trade
bridge
and
also
coordinating
for
the
growth
potentially
of
of
an
additional
bridge.
C
So
would
that
be
considered
your
outer
loop
that
green
one
would
be
considered
wps
and
for
those
of
you
that
haven't
seen
it,
anyone
can
go
on
to
google
if
you
type
in
tech,
stop
outer
loop.
It's
going
to
take
you.
That's
the
first
thing
that
pops
up
is
going
to
take
you
to
our
our
tech
style
page,
and
it's
going
to
show
you
the
feasibility
study
that
we
finished
in
april
of
2020,
and
it
will
show
you
everything
that
we
went
through
our
preferred
alignments
and
obviously
you
know
it's
a
44
mile
corridor.
C
It's
about
400
million
dollars.
We're
going
to
try
to
you
know,
like
we
say,
bite
it
off
in
pieces,
the
elephant.
You
know
one
bite
at
a
time
and
start
prioritizing
right
now.
The
area
we're
looking
at
prioritizing
is
a
section
between
59
and
359
to
provide
relief
right
between
those
two
areas
so
and
then
real
quick.
Just
you
know.
Obviously
this
is
good
news
again,
as
I
mentioned
yesterday,
they
signed
into
effect
the
utp,
but
with
that
utp
we
got
three
additional
projects
that
are
funded
and
listed
on
there.
C
This
is
us59,
it's
a
20
mile
section.
We
just
got
302
million
dollars
in
category
four
and
that
is
going
to
continue
us-59
heading
out
towards
freer,
eventually
heading
towards
houston.
It's
part
of
the
ports
to
port
corridor,
and,
if
you
ever,
if
any
of
you
listen
to
the
transportation
commission
and
they
talk
about
mobility
throughout
the
state,
this
is
key
because
there
are
key
rural
connectors
throughout
the
state
and
the
reason
they're
funding.
C
I
see
a
road,
I
think
everyone's
very
familiar
with
that
one
that
one
I
did
get
funded.
Actually,
if
you're
listening
to
last
npo,
I
guess
we're
going
through
the
process.
This
next
npo
it'll
be
voted
on
and
finalized,
but
that
project
is
being
listed
already
on
the
utp.
C
It
was
funded
for
35.3
million
dollars,
that
is,
a
mixture
of
local
funding,
category
12
and
then
local
dollars
and
and
cat7.
I'm
sorry
so
that
project
again,
we
don't
have
letting
date
on
there.
Yet
that
has
been
managed
by
the
rma
so
we'll
we
can
come
back
to
you
later
with
more
information
on
that.
As
far
as
when
that
project
we're
ready
to
go
to
construction.
D
C
C
Ended
with
this
one
on
purpose
right,
so
everyone
could
be
listening,
paying
attention
waiting
for
this,
the
loma
sensor
project
actually
did
get
funded.
We
have
23
million
dollars
of
category
2
that
was
assigned
to
it.
The
estimate
we
have
right
now
is
currently
at
30
million,
so
we
have
about
a
seven
million
dollar
shortfall.
We
are
going
to
be
looking
this
year
for
alternatives
to
fund
that
gap,
but
we're
not
going
to
wait
to
get
that
project
going.
We
already
have
a
consultant
on
board.
C
C
We
can
let
that,
if
you
ask
me
we're
going
to
try
to
let
as
soon
as
possible,
our
goal
is
to
try
to
let
it
by
fy25
latest
fi
26
and
that
area
the
other
two
overpasses
sierra
vicente
to
lindo-
we're
not
funded
yet,
but
we're
also
going
to
be
preparing
the
psne,
so
the
plans
will
be
ready
on
the
shelf
ready
to
go,
and
that
ends
my
presentation.
It
was
a
lot
of
information,
but
you
all
have
any
other
questions.
So
you're.
C
That
is
correct.
If
you
look
at
those
intersections,
I
know
again,
you
discuss
it
at
one
point.
It
was
open,
unfortunately,
based
on
the
accidents
that
continue
to
occur.
We
closed
the
road,
but
we
did
add
turnarounds.
We
had
acceleration
names,
deceleration
lanes
right
to
give
people
options,
we
added
safe
lanes,
and
yet
I
mean
we
see
that
their
accents
still,
unfortunately
continue
to
happen.
C
The
saving
grace
I
guess
for
this
project
is
once
you
have
an
overpass,
will
all
that
high-speed
traffic
will
eventually
stay
over
the
overpass,
and
then
you
have
the
slower
traffic
on
the
side.
I
know
that
lomas
el
suite
is
a
priority
because
of
the
sports
complex,
which
is
why
we
really
pushed
for
it
to
get
funded,
and
it
did
so
we'll
be
moving
forward.
We're
moving
forward
with
that
project
and,
hopefully
letting
it
here
soon.
Absolutely
all.
A
Right
one
last
question:
the
10-year
plan,
the
funds
that
you
have
for
the
10-year
plan.
How
much
of
that
funding
is
for
increasing
lanes
on
I-35,
going
on.
C
C
C
Right
now,
that's
going
to
go
all
the
way
past
about
a
mile
and
a
half
10
mile
mark
for
20.
C
But
if
you
look
at
that
project
that
projects
you're
already
scheduled
to
let
in
in
2026
september
22nd,
I
get
it
but.
A
C
Of
truck
traffic
right
now,
a
lot
of
truck
traffic,
so
I
I
didn't
show
it
on
here,
because
I
I
didn't
want
the
printing
to
get
even
longer,
but
we
currently
have
a
schematic
and
a
consultant
on
board.
That's
taking
it
to
six
lanes
all
the
way
to
my
marker
30.
from
my
marker
30..
So
we
have
the
schematic
they're
working
on
the
psn
already
so
plans
on
the
shelf.
Unfortunately,
now
we
don't
have
funding
for
it.
C
But
again
I
want
everyone
to
know,
and
I'm
glad
you
brought
it
up
is:
is
we're
trying
to
be
proactive
as
far
as
having
these
plans
ready,
having
them
ready
to
go
that
way?
When
we
get
the
money,
we're
not
waiting,
you
know
to
get
the
plans
done,
get
the
schematics
done
so
we've
had
someone
on
board
for
about
a
year
and
a
half
already
we'll
we'll
have
those
plans
ready
to
go
when
funding
becomes
available.
So
thank
you.
Does
anybody.
A
Else
have
any
questions
for
mr.
What's
up,
I
want
to
thank
you
very
much.
That
was
a
very
good
presentation.
This
commission
was
looking
for
something
like
that,
so
that,
as
we're
making
decisions
on
upcoming
subdivisions
and
stuff,
we
have
a
good
idea
as
to
mobility
for
these
new
subdivisions.
Yes,.
C
Sir
I'll
be
happy
to
send
that
consent
to
the
time
department.
They
can
share
that
with
you
all.
I
mean
all
this
all
these
information.
It's
posting
our
text
our
website,
so
this
is
our
public
record
so
I'll
send
that
all
to
y'all,
so
you
can
have
a
copy
of
it.
Okay,
thank.
B
All
right
and
just
to
let
you
know,
we
still
have
weekly
meetings
with
txdot
to
discuss
new
plats
that
come
in
so
that
they're
involved
in
that,
so
that
they
know
what's
going
on
with
some
of
the
growth.
So
when
you
see
platts
that
come
to
pnz,
we
have
had
a
meeting
with
txdot
ahead
of
time
just
to
go
over
it.
So
roberto
is
real
good
at
going
to
the
meetings
and
and
being
involved.
A
All
right,
the
next
item
that
we
have
on
the
agenda
is
consideration:
approval
of
the
minutes
of
a
special
meeting
of
july
28th
of
a
meeting
of
corrected
minutes
of
the
meeting
of
august,
the
fourth
and
the
regular
meeting
of
august
the
18th.
Can
we
have
a
motion
move
to
approve.
We
have
a
motion.
We
have
a
second
by
daniela,
all
those
in
favor
sing
about
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries
thank
you.
Anybody
signed
up
for
citizens
comments.
A
B
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record
we
have
the
lotus
hernandez
owner.
We
have
property
location,
lot,
7
block
2031
eastern
division
located
at
3220
santa
barbara.
We
have
his
own
change
request
from
an
r3
to
b1.
Whoever
proposed
uses
a
restaurant
letter
sentence,
35,
none
for
and
then
against
location
view.
I
A
A
A
L
Land
development
incorporated
land,
it's
the
owner
and
applicant
edward
d
garza
pe
is
a
representative.
The
property
location
is
located
south
of
highway
state,
highway,
359
and
east
of
concord
hills
boulevard.
The
zone
change
request
it's
going
for
a
planned
unit,
development
for
townhouses
pud.
L
M
Mr
chairman,
members
of
the
commission,
edward
got
subway
train
engineering,
we're
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
proposed
pud
request.
Our
plan
is
to
develop
and
promote
a
more
economic
opportunity
for
housing
in
the
lago
devaya
development
by
providing
some
single
family
town
home,
and
the
idea
here
is
to
develop
some
smaller
homes,
but
that
still
are
developed
to
resemble
a
larger
size.
Look
of
a
single-family
residence
to
coincide
with
the
neighborhood.
M
That's
already
existing
home
prices
have
have
escalated
dramatically
in
the
area,
and
the
goal
of
the
developer
here
is
to
provide
a
a
an
option
for
more
affordable
housing.
We
we're
asking
for
a
hud
on
the
entire
acreage,
but
we're
only
planning
to
use
two
acres
of
the
entire
acreage
after
the
housing
unit.
The
rest
of
the
of
the
land
will
be.
You
will
still
be
maintained
for
a
park
as
part
of
our
master
plan
and
storm
water
management,
and
so
we
haven't
started
the
replanting
process.
M
A
M
B
Mr
chairman,
excuse
me:
if
you,
if
you
look
at
the
aerial,
looks
deceiving
you
see
all
the
red.
If
you
have
it
on
where
it
says:
brown,
wood,
the
brown
wood,
the
bottom
one,
you
can
see
the
light
color
of
the
land.
That's
the
two
acres
that
they're
working
with
brown
wood.
Yeah.
Let
me
let
me
see
if
we
can
get
the
picture
up
for
you,
you
want
to
show
them
curves.
G
L
M
F
M
Yes,
sir,
I
was
part
of
the
group
that
actually,
yes,
actually
all
this
area
was-
was
developed
prior
to
the
lue
from
the
colonia
project.
This
this
land
was
not
part
of
the
colonial
planning
and
the
development,
actually
all
the
utilities
that
were
developed
for
this
lago
that
buy.
It
was
a
component
of
a
joint
venture
between
three
private
landowners
and
they
participated
in
their
own
water
and
wastewater
development
and
and
all
that
was
designed,
late,
90s,
early,
2000s
and
and
designed
for
all
this
land
area.
A
All
right,
what
are
the
I'm
going
to
approach?
Okay,
just
a
minute,
I
just
it's
a
public
hearing
right,
yeah
yeah,
you
got
it!
Thank
you
very
much,
mr
garcia.
Does
anybody
else
want
to
speak
in
favor
in
favor
of
this
r1a
put
anybody
wish
to
speak
against
against
the
r1a.
A
Put
all
right
wishes
of
the
commission
move
to
approve
the
value?
Second,
not
advice
and
the
second
by
not
rice,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
goes
against.
Motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
we
have
is
reviewed
consideration
of
the
following
master
plans.
Reviewing
consideration
of
the
monteverde
subdivision
master
plan.
The
intent
is
residential
and
commercial.
B
Mr
chairman,
just
one
one
other
item
some
housekeeping.
If
you
were
going
to
excuse
any
of
the
commissioners,
just
keep
that
in
mind
before
the
meeting
ends
that
we
have
to
do
that
we
haven't
done
it
yet.
N
O
A
A
motion:
second:
we
have
a
second
by
daniela,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
all
right.
Those
against
motion
carries
next
item
review
and
the
revision
of
the
las
adeles,
the
subdivision
master
plan,
the
intended
residential
commercial.
The
purposes
revision
is
to
combine
portions
of
phase
two
and
phase
three.
O
J
Mr
chairman
jeff
wigg
kci
technologies,
members
of
the
commission.
We
agree
with
the
comments
and
have
no
objections
to
that.
So
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
does.
F
Crossing
the
road
is
there
an
the
access
road
still
there,
the.
A
R
N
F
H
A
S
Commissioner
vince
martinez
for
chrome,
development
and
representative
mosquito
engineering,
we
concur
with
the
comments
minus
the
comments
from
traffic
all
of
the
existing.
G
A
A
G
N
Good
afternoon
robert
pena
city
traffic
yeah,
I
have
to
I
have
to
agree
with
with
we
can't.
We
can't
argue
that
this
has
been
long
ongoing
and
so
all
right.
F
G
G
A
Okay,
all
right,
let's
move
on!
Thank
you
all
very
much.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay,
I
think.
Did
you
make
a
motion?
No,
I
haven't
had
a
motion
all
right.
What
do
you
all
want
to
do?
With
this
item,
I
mean
he's
asking
the
engineers
asking
for
the
traffic
comment
to
be
removed,
the
traffic
engineer
the
street's
already
built
so
like
it's
redundant.
Really,
the
comment
is
redundant
yeah.
So
can
we
have
a
motion
to
that
to
either
way
whatever
you
guys
want
to
do?
I
move
to
approve
okay,
we
have
a
motion
from
novelina.
A
Subject
to
the
change
of
the
comment
of
traffic
safety
motion
by
anna
yeah
yeah,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
motion
carries
next.
Time
is
preliminary
consideration
of
the
plan
at
the
coast
at
winfield
phase
4a,
the
intent
is
residential.
R
A
A
R
Engineering
mosquito
engineering
proposed
use
residential.
Yes,
the
zoning
for
this
eight
law.
Development
is
r1
location,
view,
aerial
view,
street
view,
purple,
splat
staff
comments,
planning,
traffic
safety
parks
and
leisure.
R
N
A
All
right,
thank
you
all
right.
What
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission?
I
moved
to
approve.
We
have
a
motion.
Do
we
have
a
second
second,
the
second,
but
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
hi,
all
right,
closer
gains
motion
carries.
Thank
you
all
right.
Next
time,
preliminary
consideration
apply
the
codes
in
winfield,
page
6a,.
R
A
R
R
H
R
A
R
A
A
R
Q
A
A
wire
yeah,
I
got
you
yeah,
okay,
all
right,
any
other
questions
from
the
engineer
all
right.
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you.
What
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission
to
approve?
We
have
a
motion
by
anna
second
approve
in
a
second
by
daniella,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries.
The
next
item
is
the
consideration
of
the
final
flats
and
final
replats.
We
have
9a,
we
have
9b
9c
and
then
we
have
yeah
nine,
a
nine
b,
nine
c.
K
To
hear
ninety
items,
nine,
a
nine
b
and
nine
c
together.
A
K
All
right
motion
to
approve
items,
989,
b9c
and
motion.
A
T
D
T
Mr
chairman,
this
is
the
cds
2023
to
2027
capital
improvement
program.
The
numbers
are,
as
you
can
see,
it's
a
1.8
billion
dollar
capital
improvement,
but
what
I
did
I
break
it
down
to
just
the
infrastructure
is
1.5
billion
dollar
that
includes
your
roads,
your
water,
your
waste
water,
your
airport,
so
you
have
a.
T
Of
course
our
streets
are
90
percent,
funded
by
the
tech
stock
and
and
that's
include
what
you
just
saw-
the
tech
stock
presentation,
and
so
so
that's
included
in
the
capital
improvement
program.
Your
water
and
sewer
is
about
600
million
dollar
we
just
sold.
Yesterday
we
just
sold
about
125
million
dollar
for
first
phase
of
the
improvement
for
water
and
wastewater
and
the
airport.
We
do
have
some
some
grants
coming
in.
I
think
tomorrow,
congressman
coyer
is
announcing
another
grant
for
terminal
expansion,
and
so
those
are
included
in
your
plan.
T
This
is
the
breakdown
of
by
the
department,
as
you
say,
street
water
airport
wastewater
in
2023.
This
is
about
933
million.
Of
course,
majority
of
what
tech
starts
just
present
is
the
tech
start
projects
and
we
have
the
second
one.
Is
the
water
and
wastewater.
T
T
It
is
a
plan
is
not
fully
funded,
but
these
are
possible
funding.
The
bonds
grants,
developer
fees,
cash
capital,
improvement,
fund
system
revenue
and
most
a
lot
of
them.
Mostly
cd
projects
are
unfunded,
except
water,
sewer,
your
airport,
your
solid
waste,
those
are
enterprise
funds,
so
those
are
funded
through
their
either
their
revenue
or
on
the
bond.
T
We
did
present
council
this
year.
We
are
looking
at
about
31
million
dollar
bond
sale
and
so
of
course
we
are
proposing
250
000.
This
is
not
a
their
priority
fund,
we're
putting
as
a
cip,
so
the
council
will
come
up
with
one
or
two
projects
on
on
their
district
and
so
we'll
spend
that
one.
That's
about
2
million.
T
We
are
proposing
about
a
million
dollar.
These
are
the
traffic
signal
upgrades
I
mean.
Unfortunately,
all
our
signals
are.
You
can't
get
those
equipment
anymore.
It's
so
old
and
same
thing:
tight
improvement,
the
parts
improvement
and
that
include,
we
are
putting
about
a
million
dollar
worth
of
camera
because
of
the
security
issue.
G
D
T
New
street
we
we
are
funding
two
new
street,
which
is
the
finishing
the
springfield
extension
city,
just
received
a
1.5
million
eda
grant,
so
we're
putting
extra
money
to
finish
that
that
will
be
from
international
to
shiloh
and
also
the
other
project
we
are.
Funding
is
concord
hill
extension,
which
will
be
extended
all
the
way
to
the
sports
complex
where
the
new
road
is
now,
and
that
is
a
partnership
between
webb,
county
drainage,
district
and
the
land
developer
and
rma
and
the
city
so
we're
putting
our
share
about
3.8
million.
T
Of
course,
police
is
always
a
big
need:
police
annex
building
police
vehicle.
Every
year
we
buy
about
3.8
to
4
million
dollar
police
vehicle.
So
that's
a
constant
thing
and
the
fire
most
of
our
fire
engines
are
bought
about
10
years
ago.
So
now
it's
everything
needs
to
be
replaced.
So
we
are
this
year
we
are
funding
at
least
two
of
them,
because
each
of
them
is
about
a
million
dollar
engine.
T
Public
works,
they
can't
do
anything
without
equipment,
so
we're
funding
about
a
1.5
million
dollar
and
general
government.
We
have
this
federal
courthouse.
We
are
doing
some
design
to
use
the
courthouse
at
least
the
second
floor,
but
the
hvac
is
50
year
old,
so
we're
going
to
replace
the
hvac
system
and
and
the
bruni
plaza.
T
Also,
as
you
know,
the
bruni
braza
is
vacant,
but
we
are,
we
are
putting
in
it
and
that
three
one
one
will
be
going
there
going
to
do
some
remodeling
inside,
and
so
they
will
be
housed
there
and
then
the
library
will
go
open
again.
T
Federal
courthouse
at
this
moment
the
second
floor,
we're
looking
at
office
space,
maybe
the
economic
development
we
we
need
a
lot
of
office
space
for
the
city
building
so
since
this
building
is
sitting
there,
so
that's
we're
looking
at.
There
is
no
plan
yet
on
third
floor
okay,
because
that
is
the
courthouse.
T
There
was
some
talk
about.
Maybe
city
council
chamber
do
that,
but
the
parking
is
the
issue
over
there
yeah,
but
at
this
moment
at
least
we're
looking
at
occupying
the
second
floor
and,
of
course,
animal
control,
that's
another
one.
We
are
expanding
the
surgical
center.
The
current
center
is
so
small.
We
cannot
do
a
lot
of
surgeries,
and
so
that
is
that
is
funded.
As
I
said,
we
have
a
lot
of
need.
The
department
requested
about
61
million
dollar
worth
of
equipment.
T
F
For
me,
I
I
had
some
concerns.
I
obviously
shared
him
with
you
earlier,
but
I
have
some
concerns
where
you're.
This
is
a
capital
improvement
plan
that
projects
the
city
projects.
It
doesn't
project
other
agency
projects,
it
doesn't
project
tech
stock.
You
have
no
way
of
knowing
if
faa
is
going
to
give
you
money
for
the
airport.
Yet
you
project
in
the
capital
improvement
plan
a
number.
F
Unless
you
have
the
money
in
hand,
I
don't
see
how
you
could
project
that
figure,
and
I
know
that
transit
is
not
a
department
of
the
city.
Yet
you
also
include
different
items
related
to
transit
as
part
of
what
you're
doing
it's
going
to
happen
in
the
city,
but
because
they
were
unionized
when
transit
was
originally
established.
F
There
was
always
an
arms
length
agreement
with
the
city.
That's
why
the
city
councilmen
aren't
on
the
board
of
transit,
and
so
it
surprises
me
that
you've
done
that,
and-
and
I
noticed
also-
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
mistake,
but
I
noticed
that
you
had
several
utility
expansions
on
luke
20
and
they
seemed
to
be
concurrent
in
several
years,
the
same
items.
F
So
I
don't
know
if
you're
doing
them
in
phases
or
or
in
fact
you
don't
have
enough
money
to
do
them
in
the
year,
like
you
have
airport,
to
clark
utility
expansion,
26
27
28,
is
it
the
same
thing
or
are
you
doing
a
different
line
every
year
or
what
is
it
that
you're
doing?
Mr.
T
Chairman,
I
will
answer
on
the
loop
that
the
relocation
of
water
and
wastewater
as
current
loop,
most
of
the
water
and
sewer
system
is
within
the
existing
right-of-way.
Since
loop
gonna
be
interested,
we
have
to
relocate
those
water
and
sewer
line,
and
so
what
we're
doing
we
are,
we
basically
hire
the
same
consultant.
Tech
start
has
so
we're
working
with
them,
which
are
the
projects
coming
in
first,
because
that's
the
one.
We
have
to
relocate
our
line
first
before
tech
start
coming
in.
That's
why
you
see
in
phases
so.
T
Most
of
them,
yes,
the
issue
was
some
of
them
are
on
there
right
away,
but
with
some
kind
of
permit
those
are
reimbursable.
Some
of
them
we
went
in
without
having
any
kind
of
instrument,
and
so,
if
we
don't
have
any
kind
of
document,
they
don't
know
it
wasn't
on
my
what
but
the
last
time
we
did
the
clark.
Yes,
we
got
like
80
reimbursement
on
the
clock
overpass.
So
this
one
we
expecting
pretty
much.
80
percent
probably
get
reimbursed
the.
F
I
noticed
that
some
developers,
particularly
along
highway
359,
that
have
come
in
they'll,
come
in
with
what
I
call
a
two
two
prong
development,
part
of
it
in
town
and
part
of
it
out
of
town,
and
I
asked
one
of
the
engineers
if
he
had
lue's
and
he
didn't
have
it
yet.
We
approved
it,
and
so
if
these
developments
continue
to
come
in
you're,
never
going
to
get
the
developer
to
pay
for
the
water
line
that
it
needs
for
the
development.
T
To
answer
your
question:
the
lue
on
359
those
colonias
project.
When
those
project
came
in
there
was
some
landowner,
they
did
oversize
and
cd
also
oversized
the
line
so
city
had
about
1000
lue.
We
are
very
close
to
exhaust
all
those
lue,
so
that
means,
after
once
we
exhaust
them.
The
developer
has
to
build
those
transmission
lines.
Those
distributions
who
gives
a
signal,
it's
the
utilities
because,
as
I
say,
we
are
pretty
much
about
to
be
done
with
what
is
the
existing
luv.
We
have
because.
T
T
So
the
those
are,
those
are
the
issues
that
I
think
city
did
a
great
job,
expecting
that
there
will
be
a
lot
of
growth,
but
it
didn't
happen,
and
now
we
we
are
in
30
years
now,
and
we
have
to
we
flush,
almost
a
million
million
and
half
gallon
on
that
area.
If
not
in
five,
if
we
don't
flush
for
five
or
seven
days,
we
go
in
a
boil
water
notice.
T
But
those
those
are
the
things
we
face.
Is
there
any
other
question
I
can
answer.
Oh
on
transit
transit.
It
is,
as
you
know,
we
use
a
transit
sales
tax,
so
we
do
have
management
company.
They
work
for
the
city
and
the.
T
T
H
Okay,
I
have
a
question:
how
does
the
250
000
per
district
amount
came
to
be
like
what
determined
that
amount.
T
T
F
T
F
T
We
are
able
to
convince
them
to
fund
two
true
street
projects,
one
in
north
loredo,
which
is
springfield
one
in
south
florida,
which
is
concord
hill,
so
they
all
agree.
So
at
least
we
are
able
to
do
two
projects
which
is
much
needed.
I
believe
once
we
open
the
sports
complex,
we
don't
have
concord
hill
and
this
overpass
I
mean
you
can
get
out
from
the
sports
complex.
T
Now,
yeah
because
you
don't
have
any
exit,
but
with
with
the
lost
precedent
extension
and
with
this
extension,
you
will
have
three
exit.
Instead
of
having
one.
A
B
Yes,
sir,
you
had
some
questions
or
the
the
commission
had
some
questions
at
the
last
meeting
about
r1b.
So
we
asked
the
engineering
to
to
come
to
answer
any
engineering
questions
you
might
have
just
some
of
the
problems
that
we
have
with
r1b.
P
P
I
believe
the
questions
that
that
I
was
told
that
you
might
have
is
regarding
the
the
size
for
the
local
collectors
and
the
size
for
the
local
streets,
I'm
not
mistaken,
and
the
problem
that
it's
surfacing
surface
and
right
now,
it's
that
emergency
vehicles
might
not
have
enough
space
to
to
drive
through
the
area.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
now
we
prepare
a
small
little
exhibit.
I
don't
know.
P
So,
generally
speaking,
we
have
a
50
feet
right
away
and
we
have
a
31
back
to
back
now,
pavement
section
and
talking
about
like
the
curve
and
gutter.
We
we
have
another
like
three
more
feet
with
the
length
of
the
cutter,
so
so
that,
having
shown
that's
something
that
it's
stipulated
on
the
ordinance,
that's
something
that
we
as
the
city
we
cannot
change
or
the
engineering
department
cannot
change
what
it's
in
their
ordinance.
P
Now
I
I
I
was
told
that
and
a
recommendation
was
that
maybe
changing
everything
to
not
necessarily
changing
everything
but
mending
it.
P
Everything
to
60
right
away
and
41
back
to
back
now.
If
that
was
the
case
again,
one
one
of
the
things
will
be
having
to
go
through
the
city
yards,
and
I
meant
that
change
it.
P
Also
another
thing
that
we
might
see
it's
all
during
the
design
phase
of
the
subdivisions
could
be
that
sight.
Distance
problems
could
erase
arise.
Sorry
another
thing
could
be:
you
know,
lowering
the
square
feet
of
the
lots,
because
at
the
end
of
the
day,
you're
sacrificing
extra
right
away
for
for
the
emergency
vehicles.
We
understand
that
it's
emergency
vehicles
right,
but
at
the
end
they
you
also
sacrificing
the.
P
Sorry
for
that
the
the
cost
of
of
the
of
the
residents
that
could
actually
buy
a
house
in
our
area
now,
what
else
can
we
do?
I
guess
for
the
city
of
laredo,
if
we
have
the
situation
where
emergency
vehicles
do
not
fit
and
by
the
way
on
on
the
general
width
of
a
fire
truck,
it's
about
eight
and
four
four
inches
eight
feet
and
four
inches.
P
However,
it
does
require
sometimes
to
to
have,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
chief
can
actually
also
say
something
if
I'm
wrong,
but
it
says
that
we
need
a
20,
usually
20
feet,
of
unobstructed
access
road
for
for
emergency
vehicles.
P
So
one
of
the
things
that
maybe
we
can
look
into
is
enforcing
residents
not
to
park
on
areas
where
maybe
a
high
emergency
situations
happening
on
that
area
or
just
the
matter
of
fact.
Making
the
residents
reduce
the
amount
of
vehicles
parked
on
on
the
street,
which
I
understand
it
will
be
difficult,
but
those
are
some
things
that
we
see
right
now,
of
course,
there's
more
more
into
this
aside
from
the
things
that
I
just
mentioned,
and
this
is
just
a
brief
description
of
what's
what's
going
on,
I.
F
P
Yeah
and-
and
we
understand
that
we
can
look
into
other
options
of
how
to
try
to
resolve
the
situation
again.
One
of
the
things
is
that
changing
the
ordinance,
but
I
know
it's
gonna,
be
something
that
it
will
be
a
big
hurdle
to
do,
plus
all
the
other
reasons
that
I've
just
provided
regarding
the
zoning.
That's
that
there
will
be
something
else
that
maybe
mr
navarro
could
speak
about.
P
Another
thing
that
I
mentioned
is
just
enforcing
the
fact
that
I
understand
that
what
you
mentioned
nowadays,
the
the
both
the
the
wife
and
the
husband
has
to
work
due
to
economic
situation,
the
united
states
now
so
yeah,
some
some
couples
have
more
than
two
cars
made
three
and
they
park
on
the
on
the
streets.
P
It's
it's
a
complex
situation
that,
in
order
for
us
to
solve,
we
need
to
look
into
more
options
for
four
and
having
a
solution,
as
I
think
for
right
now,
I
think
will
be
just
enforcing,
but
if
we
want
something
on
the
on
the
long
run,
we
need
to
look
into
more
options.
Well,
maybe.
F
Looking
at
creating
a
parking
space
for,
of
course,
at
the
end
of
the
block
so
that
they
don't
park
there
or
you've
got
to
do
something
because
you're
asking
the
families,
whatever
the
families,
are
to
make
a
lifelong
commitment
to
buying
a
house
they're
putting
in
a
lot
of
bucks
in
there
and
people
aren't
wealthy
so
once
they
buy
it
and
they
come
with
a
problem.
Then
they've
got
a
problem
for
the
rest
of
their
lives
unless
they
sell
the
house.
F
A
I
don't
know,
but
it's
really
for
planning.
Oh,
it's
not
for
engineering,
it's
for
planning.
If
I
remember
correctly,
the
ordinance
requires
three
parking
spaces
within
the
r1b
right,
so,
even
even
with
the
three
parking
spaces.
What
he
was
describing
is
that
we're
still
having
issues
yeah
on
the
street,
we're
not
going
into
the
actual
parking
spaces
that
are
supposed
to
that
they're
intended
to
be
used.
I
mean
that
was
why
we
added
that
additional
parking
space,
because
we
knew
that
on
a
reduced
standard,
it
was
going
to
create
these
kind
of
issues.
A
It's
a
very
hard
thing
to
enforce
and
you're
absolutely
correct
and
the
engineer's
correct,
obviously
to
try
to
go
back
and
amend
the
ordinance.
The
idea
of
the
ordinance
was
to
try
to
create
affordable
housing,
to
try
to
go
back
and
obviously
do
36
back
to
back
or
something
is
an
issue.
That's
all
costs.
It
goes
back
into
affordable
housing.
But
again
it
was
something
that
the
commission
wanted
to
to
visit
and
I
think
that's
been
done
and
we
might
continue
discussion
from
the
commission
level
on
on.