►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 050621
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 050621
A
C
A
A
A
E
That's
that's
watching
the
thousands
who
are
watching
this,
so
if
we
could
just
give
it
a
little
bit
of
time
and
while
we're
doing
that,
it's
a
good
time
to
remind
everybody
that
when,
if
you
can
keep
yourself
muted,
except
for
of
course,
when
you're
speaking
unmute
yourself-
and
if
you
forget
I'll
mute,
you
don't
mean
to
be
rude,
just
want
to
make
sure
we
have
the
best
audio
recording
for
the
public
and
so
I'll
be
doing
that.
And
we
don't
have
anybody
on
the
line.
A
A
Section
by
analyzer
motion
to
approve
signify
by
saying
aye
heard
motion
carries
next
item,
discussion,
recommendations,
item,
5a
discussion
and
recommendation
regarding
the
an
amendment
to
section
24.6,
2.5
and
24.62
point
of
the
radial
land
development
code,
allowing
for
the
administrative
amendment
of
existing
special
and
conditional
use
permits
under
certain
conditions.
Yes,
sir
kirby.
E
Yes,
we
have
two
amendments
to
the
ordinance
that
we're
bringing
to
the
planning
commission
today
for
your
recommendation
to
city
council
and
the
first
one
is
dealing
with
administrative
approval
of
special
use
permits
and
conditional
use
permits.
Now
this
is
going
to
change
with
recode
anyway,
but
we
want
to
bring
it
forward
because
recode
won't
be
coming
till
august
to
the
city,
council
and
planning,
commission
and
joint
email.
E
I
want
to
note,
though,
that
we
did
make
a
provision
in
the
ordinance
that,
if
the
current
property
owner
or
business
is
out
of
compliance
with
any
of
those
conditions,
then
then
the
planning
director
may
decide
that
it
needs
to
go
back
through
the
process.
So
the
reason
we
put
that
in
there
is
let's
say
there
is
a
cell
of
a
property
that
has
a
conditional
use
permit,
except
many
of
the
conditions
are
not
being
met,
and
then
at
that
point
I
could
say
okay
as
plane
director.
E
I
can
approve
this.
If
you
show
me
a
plan
for
how
you're
going
to
get
this
into
compliance,
but
if
they
don't
have
a
good
plan
or
if
I
don't
trust,
that's
a
good
plan,
then
I'm
going
to
bring
it
back
to
the
planning
I'm
going
to.
Let
it
go
through
the
normal
process
of
the
planning
commission
city
council.
So
you
can
determine
maybe
this
isn't
a
good
location
for
a
special
use
or
conditional
use
permit,
because
they
have
a
history
of
violating
the
conditions
and
it's
impacting
the
surrounding
neighbors
negatively.
E
And
so
we
that's
part
of
the
draft
in
there,
and
the
draft
was
in
the
in
the
packet
for
the
public
and
yourself
to
view
and
put
it
it's
basically
what's
written
here.
So
we
would
like
the
impact
is
that
this
will
allow
us
to
greatly
speed
up
the
process
for
special
use,
conditional
use
permits
where
the
conditions
stay
the
same,
and
we
recommend
that
you
send
a
positive
recommendation
to
the
city
council
on
this
amendment.
E
E
C
A
A
F
A
C
E
It
just
amends
that
condition
slightly
so
that
they
can
also
allow
the
reconstruction,
so
it
allows
for
the
construction
or
or
the
modification
of
of
buildings
that
are
on
implant,
unplanted
lots
but
have
but
have
are
grandfathered
in.
Basically,
this
would
allow
the
reconstruction
so
the
complete
replacement
of
something
that
you
know
a
building,
that's
on
an
unplanted
lot
and
already
has
services.
Utilities
are
already
there
you're
aware
that
there
are
these
within
the
city.
We
don't
want
to
allow
new
development
in
those
situations.
E
We
want
them
to
go
through
the
planning
process,
but
where
there's
already
an
existing
building,
we
not
only
want
to
allow
for
a
modification
but
a
total
reconstruction
of
that
building,
because
it
would
benefit
the
neighborhood
it
would
benefit.
The
property
owner
benefit
the
occupant
of
that
building,
whether
a
renter
or
homeowner,
to
be
able
to
reconstruct
their
building,
and
do
it
correctly
and
do
it
I
mean,
do
it
through
a
building
permit,
so
they're
doing
it
to
code.
E
E
Sit
vacant,
but
we
do
want
to
see
what
they're
going
to
do,
they'll
be
able
to
build
and
not
be
in
the
setbacks.
It's
going
to
be
a
good
development,
and
so
we
want
to
be
able
to
give
the
building
official
the
authority
to
give
them
a
permit
and
and
and
the
other
few
instances
we
don't
anticipate.
This
will
be
very
often,
but
in
the
instances
where
there
may
be
something
similar
we
want
to
allow
for
the
building
official
is
present.
If
you
do
have
any
questions
for
him,
he
doesn't
have
anything
prepared.
E
E
My
estimate
would
be
that
we
probably
have
a
couple
hundred
buildings
that
are
on
unplanted
lots,
but
of
those
couple
hundred
buildings.
We
might
only
see
one
a
year
or
one
every
other
year
that
that
is
a
total
reconstruction,
so
in
other
words,
this
is
very,
very
minor,
but
it
is,
I
think,
a
justifiable
exception,
because
a
lot
of
these
lots
there
is
no
way
they
could
become
legal
compliant
and
people
are
living
there
right
now
do
we
do
we
want
to
allow
them
to
to
remake
the
building
to
code.
C
E
E
Now.
Obviously,
now,
today
the
way
we
do
things
we're
not
going
to
allow
anybody
to
construct
something
and-
and
we're
going
to
be
looking
for
that
to
make
sure
illegal
buildings
and
structures
don't
go
up
and
definitely
don't
receive
utilities,
but
where
they
have
a
long
history,
even
after
1978
of
being
occupants
and
having
in
the
city
having
extended
utilities
to
them.
That,
in
my
mind,
gives
them
claim
to
be
able
to
continue
to
exist.
In
other
words,
it'd,
be.
A
E
C
F
C
A
E
G
E
A
A
E
A
A
B
Right,
yes,
mr
chairman,
a
quick
overview
of
the
applicant
is
edward
beckelheimer
of
collegiate
commercial
investments.
The
engineering
record
is
payout,
consulting
it's
approximately
six
acres,
located
west
of
bob
bullock
and
north
of
quail
blue
quail
road
and
the
zoning
first.
A
lot
development
is
b3
and
b4
general
location.
B
A
A
A
B
E
H
H
We
concord
with
the
comments,
except
for
six
and
seven
six
and
seven
eight
six
and
seven
they're
limiting
the
access
to,
I
guess
pretty
much
to
the
city,
and
I
don't
know
if
pixel
is
gonna,
grant
us
one
or
two
or
just
a
writing
or
something.
But
I
would
like
to
change
those
two
comments
for
that,
just
that
we
have
to
go
through
text
to
get
any
access
through
through
text
or
property
instead
of
six
and
seven.
A
A
H
What
I'm
saying
is
that
usually
you
know,
that
is
a
something
that
we
go
through
text
and
and
they
you
know.
Sometimes
they
ask
us
like,
like
their
statements,
a
few
requirements
to
to
have
a
write-in
or
to
have
a
writing
right
out
or
or
any
access
to
their.
You
know
within
their
property.
So
these
these
two
comments
will
restrict
by
cloud
they
access
through.
H
H
A
E
Sir,
we
do
have
our
tractor
director
traffic
director
on
the
line,
but
simply
put
what
we're
asking
for
here
and
it's
the
same
thing
textile
is
going
to
ask
for
they
are
they
should
not
each
of
these
individual
commercial
lots
should
not
get
individual
access
to
highway
359.
They
should
have
a
shared
access
onto
this
one
road
that
will
access
this
whole
subdivision
danny.
Would
you
like
to
speak
anything
further
on
that.
D
Good
evening,
pnc
commission,
this
is
danny,
mcgee
trapper
director,
if
kirby's,
okay,
removing
those
comments-
that's
fine
with
me
or
if
he
wants
to
keep
him-
that's
fine,
also,
but
I'll,
be
working
with
texas.
On
this,
I
think
there's
a
comment
that
we're
asking
for
a
traffic
study,
so
they'll
address
those
things.
D
I'm
sure
we
can
reach
some
kind
of
conclusion,
but
I
I
think
kirby's
right
was.
We
don't
want
so
many
connections
on
this
highway.
So
if
you
want
to
keep
them
on
there,
that's
okay,
if
you
want
to
limit
them
and
leave
them
in
my
hands,
work
with
texas,
that's
another
route.
Whatever
commission,
we
want
to
do.
E
Well,
I'm
fine
with
striking
them,
because
this
that
right
of
way
belongs
to
the
state
and-
and
I
can
tell
you
right
now-
they're
going
to
agree
with
those
comments
that
are
there,
so
it
really
it's
the
redundant
being
there.
But
textile
is
not
going
to
allow
access
for
each
of
those
individual
lots.
G
E
Planning,
commission
also
has
the
ability
to
say
no,
we
agree
with
you.
We
don't
want
five
access
points
for
for
here
on
359,
that's
unsafe,
yeah.
It
maybe
adds
more
value
to
these
commercial
properties,
but
but
we,
as
the
planning
commission,
are
concerned
about
the
safety
of
that
road
and
the
traffic
on
that
road,
and
so,
regardless
of
what
txdot
says,
that
is
the
right
way
to
do.
E
A
I
believe
the
comments
that
textile
had
was
that
a
traffic
analysis
is
going
to
be
necessary
to
determine
what
to
do
and
whether
they're
going
to
need
acceleration
and
deceleration
lanes,
as
it
is
already
paying
a
lot
of
traffic.
So
I
think,
with
the
traffic
analysis
study,
I
think
that'll,
probably
you
know,
determine
exactly
what
needs
to
be
done
and
with
damaging
working
on
that.
F
If
I
may,
mr
sherman,
commissioner
dominguez,
I
think
I
think
we
should
leave
the
comments
there
and
and
probably
add
that
those
will
be
pending
the
outcome
of
the
of
the
study.
I
think
on
this.
One
kirby
is
right:
well
he's
always
right,
but
this
one
he
has
a
point
there
and
I
believe
that
that
we
should
leave
that
that
particular
comments
and
then
let
the
engineer
castillo
to
go
ahead
and
and
break
it
down
with
a
texar
and
then,
if
he
gets
something
positive
from
texas.
F
That
would
allow
him
different
access
point
into
the
property.
Then
either
either
I
mean
institutely
that
could
be
worked
out
with
with
a
proof
and
the,
and
there
is
test
results
on
the
hand
I
mean
that
could
be
removed,
but
I
think
at
this
time
it
would
be
better
to
live
in
there
359
it's
we
need
to
to
create
less
traffic
into
359
as
possible.
H
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
The
thing
is:
if
these
they're
getting
into
textual
property,
I
agree
or
not.
I
don't
disagree,
they
may
not
like
it,
but
that
or
they
may
not
allow
us
to
get
a
driveway,
but
now
the
city
is
making
the
decision
for
texas.
Now
now
we
can
you
with
this
note
there
we
cannot.
H
H
The
the
tia
says,
because
now
you
we
have
the
restriction
on
the
and
if
we
leave
it
there,
then
I
will
have
to
get
it
approved
by
texas
and
then
come
back
and
say:
okay,
you
know
now
remove
them
and
replace
and-
and
do
so.
I
think
these,
like
I
said
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
saying
that
takes
up,
needs
to
that
and
like
keep.
H
It
feels
pretty
confident
that
they're
not
going
to
prove
them
and
really
that
might
be
the
case,
but
it
may
be
that
they
ask
us
to
put
a
auxiliary
lane
and
they
they
grant
us
a
writing
only,
and
why
would
take
that
away?
I
mean
why
I
mean
with
this
you're
taking
that
away
and
he's
not
serious
property.
This
is
the
state
he's
the
state,
the
one
that
has
the
jurisdiction.
Mr.
D
D
If
you
want
to
take
those
comments
off,
if
you'll
trust,
in
my
judgment,
to
work
with
texas
I'll
make
sure
that
those
your
wishes
are
carried
out,
you
know
at
least
the
spirit
of
them,
but
I
I
don't
see
a
whole
lot
of
other
driveways
being
branded
by
textile,
and
you
know
you
know
my
my
background
is
in
that
area,
so
I'll
be
looking
at
it.
From
the
same
point
of
view.
F
F
So
I
think
oscar
what
you're
trying
to
do
is
trying
to
take
a
chance
and-
and
you
will
still
come
back
because
if
they
don't
approve
it,
then
you
will
still
have
to
come
back
and
show
us
how
you're
gonna
reject
redirect
the
traffic
inside
from
the
from
the
main
entrance.
So
that's
the
reason
that
I
want
to
leave
them
there
and
then
come
back
and
approve
them
when
you
have
something
that
you
can
show
us,
but
of
course
I
mean
it's
up
to
the
board.
We
can
do
it
both
ways.
A
Agree,
you
know
in
my
in
my
time,
working
with
the
city
anytime,
we
had
a
flat
food
that
had
textiles
adjacent
to
it,
a
practical
impact
analysis
device
conducted.
I
gave
him
some
examples
where
they
would
only
allow
x
number
of
openings
when
we
built
the
walmart
or
something
out
of
them
and
that
whole
complex.
A
We
had
to
do
a
ring
road
within
the
property,
because
there
was
only
a
couple
of
entrances
that
were
allowed.
This
reminds
me
of
a
very
similar,
the
oscar.
This
reminds
me
of
something
very
similar
to
what
you're
proposing,
given
that
we've
had
a
lot
of
accidents
on
359,
especially
on
left-handed,
turns
in
that
area.
A
A
A
I
don't
think
the
comments
that
we
have
in
the
planning
section
really
make
any
difference
to
be
honest
with
you,
because
it's
a
textile
position,
they're
the
ones
that
are
going
to
grant
the
entrance.
So
you
know
that's
my
my
thought
on
that
I
mean,
but
again
whatever
the
wishes
of
the
commission
are.
If
anybody
else
has
anything
to
say,
I
went
into
this.
C
D
D
G
D
H
And
just
to
what
mr
dominguez
was
saying,
I
am,
I
am
proposing
that
taking
those
out
and
then
adding
the
one
from
texas
and
that
they
need
to
approve
it
and
actually
texas
and
the
traffic
department
already
have
the
comments
there
and
we're
not
opposing
to
those.
We
are
concurring
with
those
because
we
know
we
still
need
to
go.
A
Those
comments,
I
think
that
he
wanted
strictly
friction,
but
they'd
be
replaced
with
a
comment.
It
says
that
the
driveway
should
be
determined
based
on
traffic
impact
analysis.
Just
like
carbon
state
is
a
redundant
thing,
that's
already
in
the
textile
right
away,
but
if
that's
what
you
want
to
add
to
it
to
replace
those,
I.
F
Don't
know
what
what
oscar
is
saying
it
almost
that
that
now,
if
we,
if
that,
if
it
can't
stay
there,
he's
already
bound
to
it
see
he
has
to
go
on
that
particular
route.
Whereas
if
we
change
the
comments,
we
leave
them,
but
we
change
them.
If
we
add
that
they
will
actually
be
a
approved,
consider
pending
consideration
at
tex
dot
on
those
entrances
see
one
of
the
reasons
that
I
don't
agree
to.
F
That
is
because
one
of
the
biggest
problems
that
we
have
in
those
those
highways
too
many
entrances
at
one
time,
so
that
creates
a
lot
of
traffic.
A
lot
of
problems
with
with
accidents
it's
not
about
the
subdivision
is
that
I
mean
it's
about
the
amount
of
entrances
that
we're
gonna
have
if,
if
it
would
be
the
entrance
and
then
there
would
be
a
separate
road
inside
the
property
that
will
that
will
communicate
all
of
the
four
commercial
laws.
F
I
doubted
that
they're
going
to
go
ahead
and
approve
them
and
he's
going
to
have
to
come
back
and
show
us
how
he's
going
to
move
the
traffic
inside
those
commercial
areas.
But
if
that's
what
he
wants,
I
mean
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that.
The
idea
is
not
to
stop
it.
The
idea
is
to
work
with
him.
Kirby.
E
Yeah,
I
would
follow
the
recommendation
of
our
traffic
director
dave,
mcgee
and
he's
okay
with
striking
those
comments.
He
feels
confident
that
between
him
and
txdot
that
they're
going
to
work
out
what's
safe
here
and
and
I'm
sure
it's
going
to
be
very
similar
to
what
we've
proposed,
which
is
limiting
access
or
having
no
access
and
having
shared
access.
That
is
the
better
way
to
do
it.
There
is
no
doubt
that
traffic
on
359
is
already
there's
already
a
lot
of
traffic,
and
it's
only
going
one
direction.
E
That's
more
so
the
right
way
to
do
it
is
to
have
shared
access
off
of
one
access
for
the
whole
development,
rather
than
any
individual
access,
even
decel
lanes,
and
but
you
know
some
if,
if
they
want
to
try
to
work,
you
know
oscar
wants
to
to
do
his
best
to
try
to
convince-
and
you
know
our
traffic
director,
mr
mcgee
is
open
to
striking
those
comments.
Then
I
would
follow
his
recommendation.
F
A
E
C
F
C
A
A
A
B
B
The
app
for
the
record,
the
applicant,
is
george
martinez,
engineer
of
record
board:
consulting
llc,
approximately
19.14
acres
located
north
of
state,
highway,
359
and
west
facility
landfill.
The
zoning
is
r1
and
ag,
and
the
proposed
use
is
residential
and
commercial
general
location,
aerial
view
street
view
and
the
proposed.
H
A
D
E
G
E
Think
the
the
comment
would
be
not
that
we
tape
not
that
we
wait
for
the
outcome
of
the
tia
of
the
master
plan,
not
that
we,
you
know
you're
right.
The
master
plan
was
just
approved
with
conditions
and
the
one
of
those
conditions
was
a
tia.
So
I
think
what
mr
mcgee
is
saying
before
we
approve
this
phase.
We
wait
for
the
outcome
of
the
tia
on
the
whole
master
plan,
because
that
may
affect
this
phase,
and
I
think
that
is
a
prudent
thing
to
ask
that
this.
D
A
The
master
plan
has
got
some
approval,
but
it's
got
a
lot
of
conditions
on
it
that
has
to
be
met
before
any
of
these
spaces
can
actually
be
constructed.
The
tia
has
to
be
done
and
the
pia
is
going
to
dictate.
Obviously
you
know
the
type
of
circulation,
so
the
question
then
comes
up
phase.
One
that
he's
asking
for
approval
of
is
something
that
is
going
to
be
contingent
on
the
cia.
Anyway,
am
I
correct.
H
I
mean
they
keep
moving
muting
me
I
mean
the
access
is,
is
gonna
have
to
we.
I
mean
they're,
not
gonna,
allow
us
to
connect
until
a
tia
and
texas
and
the
city
give
us
that
permit
so
there's
no
sense
to
to
stop
the
development,
because
without
these
I
cannot
proceed
with
my
plan
and
then
this
I
have
never
seen.
H
I
have
never
connecting
in
my
15
years
in
the
city
that
I
have
never
done
a
connection
without
exotic
crew
I
mean
so
it
needs
to
have
a
we're
going
to
have
an
tia.
We're
gonna
have
a
it
may
be
just
just
to
for
the
record,
regardless
if
it's
the
entrance,
through
through
gator
or
or
to
359,
with
a
writing
or
whatever.
If
that
happens,
we're
going
to
have
internal
circulation,
because
I
know
in
the
best
case
scenario
they
may
grant
one
more.
H
So
internal
circulation
is
going
to
happen,
and-
and
it's
just
it
doesn't
make
sense
in
my
opinion,
to
to
stop
these,
because
these
will
will
stop
me
to
to
continue
while
anyway,
if
they,
if
they
don't
allow
it,
then
we'll
just
do
the
street.
We'll
just
do
that
and
if
you
want
to
add
that
comment
that,
to
you
know
to
to
have
a
internal
circulation
we'll,
because
we're
going
to
do
that
either
way,
I
mean
either
way
either
the
way
of
the
outcomes
we
know
is
not
going
to
happen.
H
It
may
be
that,
like
mr
snyder
was
saying
it
may
be
that
they
don't
even
grant
us
one,
but
if
they
may,
if
they,
if
I
convince
them
to
have
a
writing
or
something
we,
we
will
have
to
have
an
internal
circulation
and
we'll
have
access
easements
and
everything,
but
we
just-
and
we
just
start
in
the
planning
process
and
and
if
you
put
that
extra
comment
on
the
we're
gonna
have
to
show
that
before
going
to
finance.
So
I
don't
see
why,
at
this
point
you
will
you
won't,
let
me
go
you
won't.
A
H
No,
no,
no,
I
guess
it's
just
it's
just
an
example.
Obviously,
if
that's
the
case
that
they
just
have
a
they
just
allow
us
to
write
it.
Obviously
I
would
try
to
get
a
writing
right
out
in
the
middle,
but
it
has
happened
that
if
they
grant
us
just
right
in
and
we
just
er
for
any
other
access,
we
need
to
go
through
gator
then
still.
A
F
I
think
we
should
approve
it
and
and
I'll
tell
you
why
we
already
have
on
the
previous
item.
It
was
contingent
to
take
stuff
okay,
so
he
can't
do
anything.
I
mean
we
approve
it
right
now
before
he
even
gets
a
permit
for
that.
He
has
to
show
the
entrance
and
approval
by
texas.
So
I
mean
I
think
that
if
we
don't,
if
we
don't
approve
it,
we're
just
going
to
delay
him
more
so
we're.
A
B
A
B
A
A
B
B
A
B
G
A
B
Is
mr
sherman,
the
applicant
remundo
martinez,
engineer
of
record
civil
engineering
consultants,
approximately
eighteen
thousand
ninety
thousand
square
feet
located
north
of
state,
highway,
59
and
east
of
the
silverado
landfill
the
zoning
for
this
two
tool.
Development
is
not
applicable
as
it
is
in
the
etj
and
the
proposed
uses
residential
general
location.
C
A
Second-
and
it
was
seconded
by
commissioner
dominguez,
all
those
were
knighted
for
the
motion
signify
by
saying
aye
not
heard
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
side
of
preliminary
consideration
of
reaching
light
of
the
greenhouse
subdivision,
lock,
one
block
one
into
lot,
one,
a
two:
three
four
and
five
block
one
greenhouse
subdivision
replay
and
the
granting
of
the
variance
of
section
2-3.7
of
the
subdivision
ordinance
to
allow
a
reduction
in
axis
easement
with
from
50
feet
to
40
feet
the
intense
residential.
A
A
B
H
Mr
chairman
staff,
commissioners,
oscar
castillo,
representing
the
green
house
of
division
and
to
answer
your
question,
mr
chairman,
there's
a
few
parts
that
they're
short,
but
most
of
them
is
31
and
we
may
need
to
adjust
it
with
with
the
the
replatu.
But
for
now
we're
gonna
propose
to
table
the
item.
If,
okay
with
you
guys,
okay.
A
A
A
E
Yes,
sir,
as
some
of
you
may
be
aware,
I
will
be
resigning
effective,
may
17th,
which
is
two
weeks
which
is
one
week
from
monday,
and
I
don't
want
to
go
into
the
reasons
it's
it's
personal,
but
I
do
want
to
say
that
I
wish
I
could
stay.
I
want
to
stay
for
me,
laredo
is
a
beautiful
place
and
I've
I've
fell
in
love
with
it
these
last
couple
years.
It's
there's
a
lot
of
places.
You
can
go
in
america.
E
E
Got
you
off
the
plane,
took
you
to
the
middle
of
the
town
and
took
off
your
blindfold
and
said
and
said
chairman
very
out.
Where
are
we
and
you
would
look
and
see?
Oh
well,
let's
see,
there's
the
chili's
there's
the
super
walmart
there's
the
tract
homes
I
don't
know,
are
we
in?
Are
we
in
montana?
Are
we
in
michigan?
Are
we
in
california?
E
Are
we
in
dallas?
I
don't
know
where?
Are
we
not
that
we
don't
have
those
things
here?
But
if
I
took
you
to
laredo-
and
I
I
took
the
blindfold
off,
everyone
would
know
you're
somewhere,
unique
you're,
not
somewhere
like
everywhere
else
and
there's
a
real
beauty
in
that,
and
I
and
I've
come
to
love
it
and,
of
course,
laredo
like
everywhere,
is
not
without
its
challenges,
but
there's
also
a
lot.
That's
it's
got
going
for
it
and
it
has
been
a
privilege
to
serve
as
your
planning
director
these
last
two
years.
E
We
have
done
a
lot
as
a
team
to
totally
overhaul
this
entire
department
to
to
to
do
online
and
bring
everything
online
and
digital
to
get
new
tools.
We've
done
over
150
trainings
between
our
weekly
trainings
departmental
trainings,
interdepartmental
trainings,
trainings
to
our
boards
and
commissions
trainings
to
to
new
members
who
come
in
and
everything
that
we've
done,
we've
done
as
a
team
and
what
I
firmly
believe
probably
has
a
lot
to
do
with
my
culture
and
where
I
come
from.
But
if
you
ask
me
what
makes
a
great
organization?
A
Kirby,
I
certainly
want
to
thank
you
for
your
leadership
and
redoing
that
planning
department.
I
think
that
you
brought
it
up
to
speed
as
best
as
you
could.
You
did
a
lot
of
good
changes
to
the
city,
and
certainly
I
want
to
thank
you.
For
two
years.
There
was
a
lot
of
things
that
you
accomplished
a
lot
of
things
you've
done.
E
Thank
you,
thank
you,
and
just
so,
you
understand
a
little
bit
of
the
carryover.
Ms
guerra
is
going
to
be
the
interim
director
until
a
new
director
is
appointed
and
recode
is
all
scheduled
out
and
ready
to
go
through
you're
going
to
get
an
email.
Mr
chairman,
soon
today,
probably
that
shares
the
outline
of
the
draft
is
now
online.
I
guess
I
might
as
well
show
you
if
you
go
to
our
planning
website
and
you
go
to
our
new
planning
website,
one
of
one
of
the
things
we
accomplished
as
a
team.
E
If
you
go
to
the
home
page
and
you
click
on
projects-
and
you
right
here
is
recode
laredo,
so
click
on
projects
recode
and
you'll
get
to
the
recode
page,
which
gives
an
explanation
of
the
code,
and
then
it
has
the
draft
by
chapters
with
the
table
of
contents
of
each
chapter
there.
So
you
can
see.
Okay,
I'm
interested
in
this.
That's
this
draft,
rather
than
having
to
go
through
the
draft
individually.
So
that's
all
online.
E
As
of
today
and
like
I
said
chairman,
you
will
receive
an
email
here
soon
that
spells
out
our
plan
to
bring
it
to
through
city
review
through
final
city
review.
It's
gone
through
multiple
drafts
internally,
but
now
it's
going
to
go
through
a
final
city
review.
Then
it's
going
to
go
for
public
outreach
this
summer
and
we're
going
to
do
an
initial
and
then
an
all-day
workshop
with
the
laredo
builders
association.
E
So
we're
going
to
spend
many
hours
with
them
and
then,
when
that
draft
goes
through
an
update,
then
we
will
bring
it
to
the
city
council
and
the
planning
commission
in
a
joint
meeting
in
august
and
then
at
that
point,
that's
the
10-yard
line,
and
it
really
depends
on
what
council
wants
to
do
at
that
point.
Do
they
need
additional
review?
Do
they
need
additional
changes
or
are
they
good
and
they
say
no
bring
it
back
to
the
next
regular
meeting,
we're
gonna
adopt
it.