►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Virtual Meeting 091720
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Virtual Meeting 091720
B
B
C
B
B
A
A
A
A
F
Excuse
me,
that
is
that
we
ask
the
commissioners
if
you
could
mute
your
mics
when
you're,
not
speaking,
it
really
helps
with
feedback,
so
we
can
maintain
the
best
quality
for
the
public
and
for
the
record
that
this
is
being
recorded
and
as
well.
Your
your
by
all
means,
commissioner
vr.
If
you
choose
to
you,
can
ask
for
those
to
signify
anyone
that
opposes
any
motion
that
way
no
one
has
to
unmute
unless
they
have
something
that
they
they
say
and
we
will
be
contact.
F
A
Right
moving
then
right
along
we're
moving
into
public
hearings
and
recommendations
of
an
ordinance,
we're
gonna
go
to
5a
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
of
laredo
by
rezoning
lot,
11
block
44
eastern
division
located
at
503
corpus
christi
street
from
a
b1
to
an
r3.
Yes,
sir
who's
going
to
make
the
presentation.
B
Mr
chairman
that'll,
be
me
ferzando
morales,
all
right.
The
applicant
is
juan
m
ramos
and
yolanda
ramos,
property
description
and
location
once
again
is
lot.
11
block,
44
eastern
division
at
503
corpus,
christi
street.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
b1
limited
business
district
to
r3
mix
residential
district.
The
proposed
use
will
be
residential.
B
B
The
proposed
zone
change
is,
in
conformance
with
the
future
land
use
map
of
the
comprehensive
plan
designation
for
this
area
as
a
neighborhood
mixed
used
area
that
includes
cbd,
r1,
r1,
r2,
r3,
r1b,
r1aro
and
ae
zoning
districts.
The
proposed
use
is
current
and
compatible
with
the
surrounding
mix
residential
uses
in
the
area.
A
Fernando,
let
me
ask
you
a
question
you
mentioned
that
maybe
I
didn't
hear
you
correctly,
but
you
mentioned
that
this
second
story
was
already
built.
Is
that
what
you
said
or
yes,
very
wrong?
So
no,
sir,
you
are
correct.
The
pro
then
the
it's
already
built.
So
the
purpose
of
this
zone
change
is
for
what.
B
F
H
A
year
ago
I
hired
a
contractor
and
unfortunately,
that
contractor
went
and
took
out
a
permit
and
me
thinking
that
it
was
gonna,
be
for
the
rules
that
I
made
on
top,
but
at
the
end
we
just
found
out
that
they
had
taken
out
a
wrong
permit
or
an
association
for
whatever
I
was
building
and
after
now
that
they
sent
me
the
citation
which
I
already
paid
a
fine,
because
they
first
put
a
stop
work.
So
I
take
that
fine,
first
and
right
now
on
to
trying
to
clear
up
everything
says
they
made.
H
I
don't
know,
I
thought
the
contractor
would
know
the
measurements
and
what
he
could
build
and
what
he
cannot
build
on
the
on
my
property.
But
then,
unfortunately,
I
found
out
that
they
did
everything
wrong
the
measurements
on
the
side.
So
right
now,
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
fix.
That's
why
I
applied
for
the
chain.
H
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
all
can
help
me
on
that
like
try
to
change
it,
so
I
can
instead
of
moving
10
feet
at
least
less
or
pay
a
fine
which
is
already
done
so
maybe
pay
a
fine
or
something
and
stay
like
that,
or
I
don't
know
I
mean
like
I
said
I
did
hire
those
people.
Then
they
did
everything
wrong
at
the
end.
They
didn't.
Even
they
didn't
finish
my
job.
H
F
To
provide
a
little
bit
of
clarification,
commissioner
villarreal,
the
oversight
that
was
mentioned
previously
was
not
building
departments.
The
building
department
issued
a
permit
that,
if,
if
it
was
followed
by
their
contractor,
would
have
respected
the
setbacks,
but
the
contractor
built
something
different
and
instead
of
having
them,
take
it
down
she's
asking
for
his
own
change,
so
she
can
keep
it
as
it
is.
A
A
F
A
A
I
am
going
to
call
for
the
vote,
but
only
for
those
that
are
against
the
motion
to
signify
by
saying
that
they
are
against
emotion
all
right,
gentlemen,
those
that
are
against
the
motion
signified
by
saying
you're
against
emotion,
with
none
hurt,
then
the
motion
carries.
Thank
you
thanks
guys,
it's
an
exotic
ordinance
of
the
city
of
laredo
by
rezoning
lot,
five
block
two
of
san
ysidro
business
park
located
at
317
crossroads
street
from
b4
to
m1,
light
manufacturing.
B
Yes,
mr
german,
the
applicant
is
san
isidro,
northwest
ltd,
pat
murphy
owner
applicant
and
slay
engineering
is
the
representative
property
description.
Location
is
lot
five
block
two
san
ysidro
business
park
located
at
317
crossroads.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
b4
highway
commercial
district
to
m1
light
manufacturing
district.
The
proposed
use
is
warehouse
with
insight
storage.
B
B
And
staff
supports
the
recommendation
of
a
zone
change
the
proposed
zone
change
is
appropriate
for
this
location.
It
is
in
non-conformance
with
the
future.
It
isn't
not,
in
conformance
with
the
future
land
use
map
of
the
comprehensive
plan
designation
for
this
area
as
a
mixed
use
center.
That
includes
m1
zoning,
but
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
industrial
uses
and
the
zone
change
in
the
area.
This
is
the
proposed
motion
for
approval
or
denial
of
the
proposed
zone.
Change.
G
D
A
A
With
none
heard,
the
motion
carries.
Thank
you
next
item
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
map
for
the
city
of
loreto
by
rezoning
in
approximately
20.09
acres
out
of
32.8117
acre
track,
convey
to
robert
mueller
ltd,
situated
in
portion
18,
jose
wustamante
original
abstract,
21
and
porcion
2143
aved,
morgan
original
abstract,
591,
located
southwest
of
enterprise
street
from
ag
to
m1
night
manufacturing
district,
okay,.
B
Yes,
sir,
once
again,
the
applicant
was
robert
mueller
ltd.
Francis
mueller
owner
applicant
and
cec
is
engineering.
Edward
ochoa
as
a
representative
property
description
location
is
approximately
20.09
acres
out
of
32.81
17
acres
conveyed
to
robert
mueller
ltd
zone
change.
Request
is
from
ag
to
m1
proposed
use.
The
proposed
use
excuse
me,
is
transportation.
B
B
G
L
Yes
correct
so
commissioners,
this
is
edward
o'shaw
with
civil
engineering
consultants.
Yes,
this
property
does
not
have
any
flood
zone
in
it.
So
if
you
look
at
the
shape
of
the
southern
and
western
boundary
of
this
20
acres,
it's
kind
of
an
odd
shape.
It
follows
the
floodplain
delineation,
so
there's
no
floodplain
on
this
portion.
You
know
within
our
property
we
are
adjacent
to
a
creek
on
the
southern
edge
of
our
boundary
on
the
western
edge
of
our
boundary.
L
This
property
is
adjacent
to,
as
you
can
see,
some
lots
on
in
the
inter
america
industrial
park,
my
client
who
purchased
this
property
owned
some
of
those
residential
lots.
So
the
first
step
here
was
to
rezone
this
property,
and
the
next
step
will
be
coming
forward
pretty
soon
to
you.
Guys
would
be
to
reclass
the
property
to
incorporate
this
20
acres
into
some
of
the
lots
of.
A
L
L
A
A
G
A
C
M
I
know
that
there's
another
manhole
and
another
line
going
through
the
river
through
the
city
park,
road
that
on
the
south.
So
it's
we're
going
to
be
connecting
to
one
of
those
and
and
it's
just
going
to
be
through
the
design
process
and
working
out
with
utilities
to
see
what
would
be
the
best
option
to
connect
to
to
either
or
a
sewer
available
sewer.
M
A
C
N
A
A
A
G
Over
general
overview,
the
applicant
is
jmlg
holdings,
limited
and
mrmd
development.
The
engineer
of
record
is
howland
engineering
and
surveying.
The
property
description
is
approximately
170
acres,
located
west
of
concord,
hills,
boulevard
and
east
of
cuatro
vientos
road.
The
current
zoning
is
ag
r1,
r1a
and
b4.
The
proposed
uses
are
residential
commercial
and
the
proposed
number
of
lots,
184,
general
location.
E
L
G
J
J
L
G
G
L
L
I
do
see
the
ones
I
do.
I
do
have
some
questions
for
staff,
if
anybody's
there
from
engineering
or
environmental
on
change,
the
phase
number
for
the
detention
basin
to
hurt
your
faces
or
assure
the
detention
is
providing
an
upcoming
phase
so
update.
I
guess
this
is
such
a
large
track
in
this
area
and
when
you
run
numbers
on
when
detection
is
actually
heated,
that's
when
the
tension
comes
up.
So
the
reasoning
for
these
for
these
comments
here
on
bring
up
the
attention
to
what
phase,
what
faith?
L
Would
they
like
us
to
bring
it?
I
mean
it's.
It's
kind
of
a
general
comment
that
kind
of
is
not
too
concerning,
but
it
can
be
very
concerning
because
it
kind
of
gives
a
an
option
of
saying:
hey.
You
need
to
have
the
attention
the
next
space
and
that's
kind
of
not
the
way
it
works.
It
works
based
off
of
you
know.
L
So
this
comment,
while
I
think
everybody
is,
is
waiting
for
that
regional
detention
to
be
built.
Obviously
we
get
to
a
certain
point
where
we
need
detention,
we're
going
to
have
to
we're
going
to
have
to
build
it,
but
the
idea
right
now
is
to
still
build
the
regional
detention
part.
So
these
comments
here
are
a
little
concerning
and
that
they're
just
so
general
bring
up
the
attention
to
a
previous
phase.
Is
there
a
specific
phase
out
there?
If
there's
anybody
out
there
from
engineering
requirement.
F
N
L
So,
as
we
were
previously
approved,
the
detection
pond
phase
now
is
actually
based
closer
than
is.
My
concern
with
these
comments
is
the
sheer
purpose
of
this
master
plan.
Revision
coming
in
is
just
to
show
the
current
phasing
so
that
everything
matches
the
previous
master
plans
that
have
been
coming
in.
They
have
always
shown
the
detention
pond
at
that
phase.
Why
change
it
to
a
previous
phase
like
what
makes
this
master
plan
different?
Is
it
something
that
we're
not
seeing,
which
we
don't
see,
and
that's
just
when
I
go
to
one
stop
shop
this
this.
L
This
general
term
basically
gives
a
one-stop
shop
committee,
member,
the
ability
to
say,
hey.
Well,
the
commission
said
that
you
have
to
bring
the
detention
plan
to
a
previous
phase.
We
determined
the
previous
phases
right
now,
so
we
want
it
right
now.
I
I
don't
know
that.
That's
just
the
only
thing
that's
concerning,
if,
if
we
can
somehow
kind
of
expand
it,
so
it
doesn't
make
it
so
detrimental
to
you
know
future
phases
that
that
that
would
be
something
that
I
would
be
agreeing
with.
F
A
L
A
You
guys
put
the
master
plan
on
so
we
can
all
see
it
on
the
screen,
all
right,
rick,
you
see
the
master
plan
now
point
out
to
us.
I
see
where
it's
got
an
existing
drainage,
a
detention
base
and
it's
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
this
particular
master
plan.
I'm
not
really
sure.
What
can
you
kind
of
guide
us
through?
What
you
were
thinking
in
terms
of
this
master
plan
is
that
the
site
that
you
were
going
to
go
ahead
and
and
drain
to
or
is
there
something
else
that
is
coming
up?
L
Yes,
sir,
so
the
there
it
is.
It
just
popped
up
on
my
on
my
screen,
so
we're
talking
about
the
southern
most
east
site
on
on
our
on
our
master
plan
and
that's
draining
towards
the
northwest,
basically
on
the
northwest.
Just
east
of
that
commercial
is
where
the
proposed
detection
based
off
of
our
master
plan-
and
this
was
even
before
the
drainage
district
came
into
play.
We've
always
shown
that
that
section
pot
in
that
area.
L
So
if
we
ever
decide
to
build
this
out
before
the
drainage
district,
actually
comes
in
and
builds
a
detention
pod,
we
would
have
to
build
a
detention
problem
within
our
own
site.
Now
the
webb
county
drainage
district
was
created
to
tax
this
area
that
they're
in
charge
of
so
that
they
can
maintain
the
tension
plate
that
they
can
also
maintain
drainage
structures
channels
along
this
corridor.
L
But
there
is
a
current
project
that
you
all
have
seen
los
presidences
road
that
got
preliminary
preliminary
approval,
maybe
about
a
couple
of
months
ago
and
that
currently
about
90
percent
designed
already
those
structures
on
los
presidentes
are
being
built
by
the
drainage
district
and
are
going
to
be
handled
for
the
100
year
storm,
so
that
first
step
actually
is
like
the
catalyst
so
that
this
regional
detention
can
come
to
fruition.
If
not,
the
drainage
district
wouldn't
be
participating
in
this
project.
L
So
all
this
falling
into
place
is
kind
of
leading
us
towards
the
conversations
for
regional
detention
and
they're
more.
It's
not
just
a
it's,
not
something
that
just
came
up.
It's
been
in
talks
for
a
while.
Now
now
going
back
to
the
comments,
our
detention
is
as
engineers.
We
have
to
provide
calculation
to
prove
that
water
is
not
negatively
going
to
impact
anything
downstream.
L
L
So
we
have
that
opportunity
and
for
every
phase
we
recalculate
that
we're
not
gonna
impact
anything
now
negative
downstream.
Once
something
gets
affected
negatively
downstream.
We
must
provide
for
a
detention
problem
at
that
time.
That's
when
we
provide
with
the
provider
with
the
potential
bond
here,
there's
there's
multiple
calculations
to
figure
that
out
so
for
a
comment
just
to
come
and
say:
hey,
move
up
through
your
detention,
pops
an
earlier
phase,
I
mean
I
can
provide
calculations
to
prove
that
it's
hot.
All
I
want
is
that
to
happen
at
the
one-stop
shop.
L
F
F
You're
concerned
that
you
would
be
you'd
be
required
to
do
that
here.
That
comment
from
the
engineering
department
is
there,
because
those
calculations
have
not
yet
been
provided
and-
and
I
don't
think
they've
demonstrated
in
the
past-
that
they're
gonna
that
they've
ever
asked
you
to
build
detention.
You
didn't
need,
and
so
I
think
that
comment
is
justified.
The
way
it
is.
L
Well,
I
I
mean
I
like
to
respond
to
that.
You
saying
this
on
the
record
that
until
calculations
are,
in
other
words,
not
building
it
until
when
it's
needed.
If
we
all
understand
that,
that's
what
the
comment
means
then
I'll
move
forward
with
that
comment,
and
it's
and
it's
on
the
and
it's
on
the
record
exactly
what
what
mr
kirby
says.
L
I
don't
mind
going
forward
with
that,
just
as
long
as
it's
not
just
pinpointing
a
side,
a
phase
and
saying
you
must
build
it
in
this
space
because
they
said
to
move
it
up
a
phase
as
long
as
the
calculations
require
a
detention
plan,
then
yes
we'll
do
it.
So
I
I
agree
to
what
what
mr
mr
kirby
said
and
that
we
can
move
forward
with
this
comment
as
long
as
it's,
it's
understood
that
it's
when
it's
when
it's
needed.
A
A
A
G
General
overview,
the
applicant
is
tdb
holiday,
llc.
The
engineer
of
record
is
howlin
engineering
and
surveying
approximately
582
acres
located
south
of
obsidian
boulevard
and
east
and
west
of
cuatro
vientos
road.
The
zoning
is
r1a
r2,
r1b,
r1mh,
v1
and
v3
the
proposed
user
residential
commercial
industrial.
I
mean
institutional,
general
location.
A
A
G
Right
general
overview,
the
applicant
is
afw
investments
limited.
The
engineer
of
record
is
premier
engineering
and
surveying
six
point:
seventy
five
acres
located
west
of
loma
zawa
boulevard
and
north
of
river
hill
drive,
the
current
zoning
is
b3,
the
proposed
use
is
residential
and
the
proposed
number
of
lots
is
32.,
general
location,
aerial
view
street
view.
K
A
G
General
overview
of
the
applicant
is
jmlg
holdings,
limited
and
mrmd
development.
The
engineer
of
record
is
howlin
engineering
and
surveying
20.17
acres
located
south
of
los
precedes
boulevard
and
east
of
isla
mujeres.
The
current
zoning
is
r1a
and
ag
the
proposed
use
is
residential
and
the
proposed
number
of
lots
of
turn
37.
G
G
G
L
I
A
J
A
G
Overview
applicant
is
tdb
holiday,
llc.
The
engineer
of
record
is
howland
engineering
and
surveying
approximately
14.47
acres
located
east
of
u.s,
highway,
83
and
south
of
st
look
boulevard.
The
zoning
is
r1b.
The
proposed
use
is
residential.
The
pros
number
of
lots,
161.,
general
location,
aerial
view
street
view.
L
L
L
We
met
with
the
city
of
laredo
engineering
department
to
discuss
this
and
how
we
wanted
to
proceed
with
this.
We
all
kind
of
came
to
the
conclusion
that
the
best
way
is
to
just
to
submit
the
both
class
and
have
them
clean
class,
as
opposed
to
just
keeping
that
as
one
and
having
a
letter
of
credit
for
half
of
it
and
just
kind
of
have
a
reputation
with
a
half
a
liter
of
credit.
So
this
is
a
lot
cleaner
again,
it's
under
construction.
L
The
reason
I
give
this
background
is
because
there
is
a
comment
on
there
by
traffic
and
again
we
still
we
we
we're
going
to
go
through
the
motions
with
this
to
explain
everything
more
in
detail
at
the
one-stop
shop,
but
the
traffic
safety
department
comment
is
moses
and
any
are
too
close.
Three
challenges
with
center
line
effects
of
less
than
300
feet
shall
be
awarded
the
live
stream.
L
This
project,
again,
is
like,
like
I
mentioned
earlier,
is
under
construction.
This
is
mainly,
I
guess,
like
semantics,
so
that
we
can
separate
two
projects
that
have
a
standalone
project
so
that
we
can
record
one
or
the
other.
This
project
was
already
approved.
It
had
already
gone
final
approval,
like
I
said,
under
construction,
these
street
layouts
and
the
master
plan
layouts
were
already
approved
before
that's.
Why
we're
so
far
ahead
of
the
game,
so
I
kind
of
wanted.
L
L
No,
this
phase,
this
phase
was
originally
phase
23
and
the
intent
for
everything
to
go
is
to
everything
to
get
built
in
23.
a
little
bit
into
construction.
The
developer
came
in
and
decided
that
it
was
much
better
to
separate
both
separate.
The
construction
in
two
phases
basically
come
to
a
good,
stopping
point,
a
good
transition
point
to
stop
both
phases.
Now
we
needed
to
do
phase
a
first
because
it
has
the
potential
so
that
one's
going
to
go
first
before
phase
b,
and
so
it's
it's.
L
L
Just
so
everybody
can
get
a
a
second
look
at
the
transitions,
so
you
can't
just
put
a
street
off
and
say:
oh
okay,
I'm
gonna
stop
here,
you
need
to
put
clubs,
kill
off
hydrants,
you
know
barricades
and
then,
while
the
other
one's
being
built
at
the
same
time,
so
they're
just
staggered.
We
basically
want
to
record
half
before.
Mr
b,
right
now
to
answer
your
question:
it's
the
current
phase,
23
that
currently
has
final
approval.
Right
now,.
F
L
If
you
move
it
to
the
other
side,
mr
chairman,
it
goes
into
the
commercial
tracks
on
the
other
side
and
also
it
would
be
close
to
the
hito
road.
So
if
you
look
at
her
master
plan
that
just
got
approved
with
this
layout
here,
if
you
look
at
that
master
plan,
that
shows
the
roads
here
and
you
can
see
a
hilo,
maybe
about
400
500
feet
east
of
moses
loop.
F
My
recommendation
would
be
that,
if
it's
that
this
would
have
been
something
we
should
have
caught
before,
we
have
a
new
traffic
director
they're,
looking
a
little
closer
at
some
of
these
things,
and
so
this
was
approved
previously
they've
already
gone
forward
with
these
plans.
It
wouldn't
be.
It
sounds
like
it
wouldn't
be
possible
at
this
point
to
redesign
the
project.
F
Unfortunately,
it's
not
ideal,
we
do
have
some
of
these
in
the
city.
Quite
you
know
too
many
in
the
future,
though
it
is
something
that's
very
important,
the
traffic
department
to
follow
to
follow
those
offset
minimums.
So
I
my
recommendation
here
would
be
to
if
the
commission
needs
to
strike
that
comment
that
that's
acceptable,
given
that
this
has
already
been
approved
previously.
A
A
A
G
A
When
yes,
okay,
good
all
right,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all
those
that
are
not
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
aye
not
heard
motion
carries.
Then.
The
next
item
is
the
consideration
of
the
model
subdivision
rule
compliance
with
a
flat
of
los
presidentes
e
subdivision
phase,
one
antennas
residential.
G
The
applicant
gmlg
holdings,
limited
engineer
of
record
hauling
in
holland,
engineering
and
surveying
19.46
acres,
located
east
of
quattrovertos
road
and
south
of
tabasco
drive
zoning
r1a
proposed
user
residential.
The
proposed
number
lots
is
125,
general
location,
aerial
view
street
view
proposed
plat
and
the
proposed
motion.
F
F
N
N
F
Commissioner
dovelina
sat
down
with
us
today
virtually
and
we
provided
a
training
and
orientation
for
him
turned
out.
He
gave
us
some
training
as
well
from
his
vast
years
of
experience,
we're
grateful
to
have
him
on
the
commission.
He
serves,
as
all
of
you
do
by
as
a
volunteer,
and
your
time
is
very
valuable.
We
appreciate
that
you
don't
get
paid
for
what
you
do.