►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 052120
Description
B
F
C
H
J
Mr.
chairman,
if
you
can
give
it
about
a
minute,
there's
a
30
second
lag
with
the
live
swagat
spectrum
channel
1300
to
broadcast
this,
and
while
we're
doing
that
just
a
reminder
again
that
if
you're
not
muted,
oh
when
you're,
not
speaking,
could
you
please
because
that
will
eliminate
the
echo
that
you
hear.
J
A
J
A
Good
all
right,
so
we
have
public
hearings
and
recommendations
of
an
ordinance,
the
first
one
we
have
the
minion
of
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
City
of
Laredo
by
rezoning
about
20
block
one-loop
subdivision
phase
four
from
before
highway
commercial
to
our
one
single
family.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak.
K
A
J
Rafa,
can
you
mute
the
presentation?
Absolutely
okay,
so
the
applicant
is
qrs
Ventures
Inc
at
Rebecca,
himer
and
owner
applicant
pee-yew.
A
consulting
Oscar
Castillo
is
representing
he's
on
the
line
waiting.
This
is
loop
subdivision
phase
for
V
Ford,
r1,
single-family
residential.
We
had
zero
four
and
zero
against
those
that
were
mailed
out
here.
You
can
see
a
general
areal
near
the
airport
was
the
east
of
the
airport.
Scuse
me.
Here's
a
zoom
in
this
one
in
the
next
one
are
going
to
be
very
similar.
These
were
lots
that
that
one
has
developed.
D
M
A
M
J
N
M
J
J
M
J
F
M
J
G
M
J
A
J
J
K
A
L
I
J
D
J
J
Excuse
me
sorry
there,
on
the
general
location,
this
is
on
Veterans
Boulevard,
just
off
359,
and
you
can
see
the
four
Lots
here
are
undeveloped
and
they're,
surrounded
on
both
sides.
By
here's
an
aerial
view,
the
white
is
area
that
does
not
is
not
in
city
limits,
so
that's
an
unincorporated
County.
The
current
zoning
of
this
area
is
b3
r18
to
the
south.
J
A
little
larger
area
of
the
zoning
I
know
the
colors
are
different,
but
this
is
a
area
b3,
it's
m1
to
the
north
and
then
r1
and
r1
a
to
the
south
and
then
unincorporated
behind
around
it.
Now
that
unincorporated
is
a
mix
of
residential
and
what
appears
to
be
light.
Industrial
storage
staff
does
not
support
the
zone.
Change
now,
that's
different
than
what
was
in
this
in
the
staff
report.
J
Is
already
permit
it
in
the
b3
and
what
they're
proposing
to
do,
which
is
to
do
warehouse
and
office
that
could
be
done,
an
m1
zoning
by
going
to
the
B
for
zoning,
we're
also
permitting
things
like
bars
and
mock
Anita's,
which
would
not
be
a
fit
in
this
area
before
is
reserved
for
highway.
It's
it's
called
the
highway
commercial
zone
because
it's
meant
to
be
along
major
corridors,
which
this
is
not
it's
surrounded
by
other
b1.
It's
it's
got
residential
nearby,
and
so
this
would
not
be
a
good
location
for
before
and
because.
J
A
Can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
we
can,
can
you
put
back
the
actual
screen
where
you
showed
the
City
Limits
lines
and
there
you
go
that
one
right
there.
So
right
now
on
that
aerial
that
you
showed
us,
you
had
some
I
think
some
residential
to
the
west,
if
I'm
not
mistaken
to
the
east,
does
that
all
vacant
property?
Yes
right
to.
J
A
J
Variation,
the
the
applicant
stated
and
the
applicants
on
the
line
they
can
answer
more,
but
on
the
application
they
stated
commercial.
When
we
asked
for
more
details,
they
said
warehouse,
storage
and
a
contractor's
office
now,
depending
on
what
type
of
storage
they
can
already
do,
they
can
already
do
this
storage
and
contractors
office
in
the
b3.
But
if
they're,
depending
on
the
type
of
storage,
they
might
have
to
go
to
an
okay.
A
B
D
Know
if
just
for
it's
actually
the
owner
is
a
contractor,
danger
tracker
and
mainly
he
was
gonna
torch.
It
total
to
anything
in
there
anything
to
do
wanna
store
his
material
there
and,
and
everything
inside
you
know,
like
you,
know
all
his
equipment
and
paint
and
that
ceramic
and
understand
a
wide,
a
bookkeeper
and
she.
B
A
All
right,
let
me
ask
a
quick
question:
your
kirby!
Yes,
what
what
what
officers
saying
is
that
an
ax
B
three?
We
cannot
have
a
warehouse
and
not
sure
if
I
understood
him
correctly
to
store
the
painting
I
think
he
heard
it
I
think
I
heard
as
a
painting
contractor,
but
that
he
can't
store
his
shop
in
the
in
the
facility
in
AB,
III.
A
J
G
J
That
would
that
would
be
a
better
option
or
getting
an
m1
which
there
already
is
in
the
area,
would
allow
them
to
do
storage
either
way.
A
conditional
use
permit
them
to
stay
the
current
zoning,
and
then
they
would
have
an
approved
use.
That's
more
intense,
typically
out
in
the
next
zone,
up
what
that
doesn't
allow
them
to
do
everything
problem
with
the
b4.
J
A
J
A
H
A
D
J
Yes,
we
would
be
supportive
of
an
m1,
yes,
but
that
would
that
would
require
you
to
do
in
another
application.
What
we
would
want
to
do
is
we
wouldn't
want
them
to
deny
you
in
this
one.
Otherwise,
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
come
back
for
six
months
but
to
table
it
and
then
allow
you
to
yourself
another
application
to
go
through
the
process
and
come
back.
D
D
J
The
the
be
poor
zone
and
Rob
explained
that
was
a
mistake
that
staff
supported,
but
ultimately
the
decision
is
it
made
by
staff.
We
just
give
a
recommendation
and
our
recommendation
should
have
not
been
to
support
that
before
now.
If
he
wants
to
continue
with
the
before
and
they
and
the
Quakers
here
it
denies
that
and
your
client
will
have
to
wait
six
months
before
they
come
back
with
another
application.
J
F
L
E
E
K
Absolutely
so
Kirby
the
Commissioner
the
wing
is
was
stating
that
the
consensus
of
the
Commission
this.
What
appears
to
be
to
looking
for
exploring
the
m1
and
also
to
give
the
applicant
the
benefit
of
not
having
to
for
there
to
be
any
delays.
You
know
having
to
resubmit
another
application
from
going
to
a
to
a
b3
and
an
m1
and
continue
with
the
process
now
for
the
Commission
to
go
forward
and
vote
for
an
m1
at
this
time.
If
that's
also,
okay
with
the
applicant
well.
J
C
I
A
A
A
A
L
Reason
I'm
making
the
motion
is
because
staff
is
saying
that
they
would
they
would
support
the
change
from
b3
to
m1,
and
so,
rather
than
make
them
go
through.
The
whole
process
of
reapplying
I'm
requesting
I
want
to
make
a
motion
to
close
public
hearing.
Go
against
this
recommendation
and
recommend
a
City
Council
that,
rather
than
it
be
from
a
b3
to
a
before
that
it
goes
directly
from
a
b3
to
an
m1
which
would
have
received
staffs
support.
If
that
had
been
the
original
application,
and
that's
what
staff
was
saying.
Alright,.
F
A
F
G
G
A
All
legal
the
Commission
can
make,
obviously
our
our
is
just
a
recommendation
and
sit
down.
Okay,
we're
making
a
recommendation-
and
that's
all
we're
doing
here
and
that's
why
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
that's.
What
we're
doing
is
a
recommendation.
The
ultimate
body
that
can
approve
a
zone
change
will
be
your
City
Council.
O
F
B
L
Question
Oh
Scott
mr.
Castillo,
but
my
understanding
was
the
applicant
would
have
preferred
to
have
an
m1
but
they've
chosen
before,
because
it
was
more.
It
was
not
as
intrusive
and
then
with
staff
sitting
there
against
the
before,
but
they
would
have
been
four
in
favor
of
an
m1.
That's
why
I'm,
making
an
emotional
making
I
just.
M
D
I
A
A
J
Served
this
is,
as
you
mentioned,
at
the
location
and
our
three
to
be
one.
This
is
for
a
sign
manufacturing
use
this,
and
the
next
sown
cases
are
related.
The
applicant
is
basically
doing
the
the
current
use
now
and
wants
to
expand
it
in
order
to
do
that
he
has
to
become
legal,
conforming,
and
so
the
first
thing
he's
going
to
do
is
come
up
to
a
higher
intent
sown
and
then
get
a
conditional
use
permit
for
the
for
this
use.
That
is
even
up
a
zone
higher.
J
J
View
showing
the
the
property
it
isn't
in
a
here's,
a
view
of
of
the
property,
a
street
view.
You
can
see
some
of
the
signs
that
they're
working
on
or
worked
on
in
the
past.
This
is
currently
in
our
three
zone
and
it's
surrounded
by
our
three
by
residential,
but,
as
we
stated
previously,
this
is
this
is
something
that
they've
been
doing
there
for
a
while
high-density
residential
is
what
the
future
land-use
calls
for.
K
B
Since
it
was
open
there
we
went
they
reviewed
17,
different
items
or
okay
with
all
those
points,
so
that
we
can
continue.
Luckily,
our
business
has
grown,
so
we
need
to
expand
a
little
bit
so
that
we
can
continue
to
grow
and
service
the
community
of
the
lado
Texas.
So
we
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
17
items,
a
big
book
or
gave
us
this
morning.
All
those
were
willing
to
comply
with
to
be
able
to
do
this.
Expansion,
okay,.
A
A
F
A
A
C
A
Anybody
who
votes
against
this
item
not
hearing
anything
the
motion
carries
next
item,
is
the
amending
of
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
Laredo
by
authorizing
the
issuance
of
a
conditional
use
permit
for
sign
by
refraction
and
lot
1
block
6.
This
is
the
same
item.
Is
there
anybody
on
the
line
who
wishes
to
speak
against
the
item.
A
J
J
The
staff
supports
the
proposed
zone
change
it's
in
conformance
with
the
future
land
use
map
which
neighborhood
mixed-use
includes
all
zones
except
the
higher
intensity
zones.
So
what
they're
proposing
would
fall
into
that
and
the
proposed
use
of
auto
cells
is
compatible
with
the
other
uses
of
Longmeadow
Avenue
in
this
area.
Here's
the
proposed
motion:
okay,.
K
Chairman
good
afternoon,
I
for
the
record,
I
do
have
out
of
the
angle
out
there,
the
owner
and
he
is
ready
to
address
the
Commission,
go
ahead.
Mr.
you're
alive.
H
And
one
of
the
records
that
you
are
asking
to
do,
we
were,
apart
from
the
coronavirus
her
on
the
deal
we
were
supposed
to
meet
there,
so
I'm
not
sure
now,
I
would
Peter
blow
but
I've
nothing
for
his
own
change.
All
around
us
are
turned
off.
We
want
to
open
up
a
Carlo,
and
you
know
it
was
previously
zoned
for
commercial
and
at
some
point
I
guess
when
I
bought
the
property.
Yes,
we
got
change
zone,
though
we're
just
asking
for
it
to
go
back.
Oh
yeah,.
A
N
J
Sir,
as
you
stated
here,
is
the
aerial
showing
it's
just
off:
Kelly
north,
they
Road
here's
a
zoomin.
You
can
see
the
property
it
access
is
both
the
corner
of
North,
Point
and
Kelly
de
North
Bay.
There's
multiple
entrances
exits
here
is
a
street
view
of
the
property
they
are
seeking
to
do
a
childcare
facility
here
for
more
than
13
a
category
of
use
that
requires
the
zone,
zoning
that
they're
seeking.
Currently
it
is
ro,
but
they
are
seeking
b1
commercial.
J
A
K
A
J
J
J
This
is
neighborhood
mixed-use
on
the
future,
Land
Use
Plan.
Here's
a
proposal
of
the
property,
the
neighboring
property
adjacent
to
the
west
is
r1
a
and
they
want
to
bring
this
area
to
the
same
zoning.
So
they
can
continue
the
same
type
of
development
across
the
the
property
that
they
own
staff
is
supportive
of
the
proposed
zone.
Change
is
in
conformance
with
the
future
land
use
plan
for
this
area
and
it's
compatible
with
the
users
in
the
area.
B
G
A
Okay.
We
have
motion
in
the
second,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
hi
anybody
needs
the
motion.
Motion
carries
and
thank
you.
The
next
item,
men
in
the
zoning
ordinance,
a
facility
by
repealing
ordinance
2012
that
0:08
for
resort
lock,
block
six
six,
six
Eastern
Division
located
at
12:19
East
bustamante
street
from
an
r32
b1.
Yes,
sir
Kirby,
yes,.
J
J
J
You
can
see
the
zoning
for
this
area
is
our
three
high
density
residential
and
that's
the
what
the
future
land
use
map
calls
for
a
staff
we're
supporting
this.
The
property
currently
holds
a
conditional
use
permit
for
grocery
store
and
professional
offices.
That's
how
they're
able
to
do
the
office
space
that
they're
renting.
If
this
zone
change
is
passed
that
will
be
repealed
its,
although
not
in
conformance
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
designation,
is
high
density.
J
It
is
compatible
with
surrounding
uses
and
there's
b1
in
the
area
and
similar
similar
retail
sales
in
the
area
have
to
comply.
If
it
moves
to
that
zoning
will
have
to
comply
with
the
standards
for
commercial
next
to
residential.
So
there
are
fencing
parking
and
lighting
requirements.
They'll
have
to
conform
to
here's.
The
proposed
motion.
K
J
I
I
Opening
the
b1
doesn't
guarantee
that
they're
gonna
be
selling
what
they're
selling
right
now,
but
actually
it
is
opening
the
options
to
change
the
type
of
business
they're
gonna
have
in
the
future,
so
I
would
I
would
support
a
special
use,
permit
that
would
kind
of
put
them
legalize
their
type
of
business,
but
giving
them
a
big
one
for
medical,
which
it
should
even
be
on
a
big
one.
That's
my
comment
to
the
to
the
applicant
and.
J
To
you,
after
we
can
help
answer
that
question
a
little
better,
be
retail
sales
of
medical
supplies
should
be
in
a
b1
and
there's
be
one
next
to
them
and
be
one
across
the
street
and
be
three
nearby
having
to
have
the
applicant
can
always
ask
for
another
special
use
permit
every
time
the
person
who's
leasing,
changes
it's
better
to
designate
something
for
that
use.
If
this,
if
it's
clear
that
it's
in
compatible
with
the
uses
surrounding
and
staffs
recommendation
that
it
is
hungry,
you
can,
or
you
can
send
a
resume.
Dacian
recommendation.
A
J
Plant
and
the
issue
of
discussion
last
time
was
whether
or
not
a
planning
staff
comment
to
connect
general
Milton
Road
in
Elgato
Road
should
be,
should
be
kept
or
or
not.
With
the
comments
for
this
preliminary
plant-
and
you
can
see
that
was
planning
comment
number
one
I
have
a
little
more
to
help
you
with
this
decision.
If
you'll
permit
me
there's
two
areas
of
our
ordinance
now,
let
me
just
backtrack
a
little
bit
here.
J
So
there
was
a
master
plan
that
was
approved
last
year
in
September,
I
sent
everybody
a
link
to
the
meeting
packet
and
also
to
the
meeting
where
you
could
view
it
on
YouTube,
a
record
of
the
meeting
and
at
that
at
that,
when
they
brought
in
their
master
plan
staff
recommended
that
they'll
got
to
Road
and
general
Milton
Road
be
connected
and
those
those
comments
were
accepted.
So
the
general
plan,
we
there's
a
requirement
that
that
gets
submitted
to
us
I
understand
there
were
health
issues
with
the
previous
engineer.
J
That's
most
likely
why
they
did
not
get
that
back
in
paper,
but
what's
binding
is
not
what
they
drew.
It's
what
was
accepted
at
Planning
Commission,
now,
that's
important,
because
the
if
they
don't
want
that
road
there.
The
correct
process
is
to
first
change
the
master
plan
and
and
or
at
least
concurrently
at
the
same
time,
change
the
phase
that
they're
dealing
with
here.
This
is
this
phase
here
and
so
minimum
they.
They
also
need
to
do
that.
If
you
decide
it
really
should
be
done
at
the
same
time
and
not
after
but
as
well.
J
They
were
able
to
get
bill.
If
you
look
at
the
subdivision
ordinance,
it
says
that
section
three
to
dead-end
streets
designed
to
be
to
be
so
permanently
will
be
no
longer
than
500
feet,
so
there's
no
way
that
these
roads
could
have
gotten
built
if
the
intent
was
them
to
permanently
end
and
anybody
that
would
have
looked
at
the
plats,
here's,
the
plat
for
the
property
just
to
the
west
of
this
property.
This
shows
the
road
continuing
Elgato,
Road
continuing
and
the
plat
to
the
north
shows
General
Milton
Drive
continuing
as
well.
J
Now
these
plots
didn't
include
that
property,
so
obviously
that
wasn't
done
yet,
but
the
intent
of
both
of
these
roads
was
that
general
Milton
and
algata
Road
would
continue.
Now
I
went
this
week
and
talked
with
some
of
the
because
I
know
some
of
the
discussion
was.
Is
this
needed
or
not
our
traffic
engineer
for
the
city,
whose
can't
be
available
for
this
meeting
stated
that?
Yes,
it
definitely
is,
but
I
also
wanted
to
ground
test.
J
That
and
I
was
entirely
open
to
whatever
comments
that
the
that
the
neighbors
would
say,
I
want
to
read
these
they're
very
quick
from
MEDLINE
the
plant
manager.
This
is
the
property
directly
to
the
north.
They
said
we're
using
the
road
already
saves
time
voids
traffic.
It's
an
important
connection
also
affect
safety,
because
it
avoids
cross
traffic,
turns
on
Killam
the
property
to
the
southwest
CQ.
J
It
would
be
beneficial
drivers,
use
it
already:
Edward
Kent,
Eduardo
Kent
who's,
the
general
manager
there
and
in
the
property
to
the
west,
all
their
Kerman
intermodal
operations
TCS
he
said
having
to
having
to
already
deal
with
traffic
congestion
due
to
the
street
being
a
dead
end.
Our
thought
is
that
any
further
development
requires
a
street
to
be
put
in.
This
is
a
must
working
with
a
cola.
Sac
would
be
crazy
as
it
would
magnify
the
congestion
problems
we
already
have,
and
then
I
just
want
to
show
you.
G
Mr.
chairman
have
requests
for
the
plan
director,
so
the
adjacent
properties,
including
the
large
one
to
the
west.
Why
wasn't
there
were
twice
wide
leave
a
small
piece
of
land
to
to
shoulder
the
burden
and
to
the
tune
of
20%
loss
of
land
and
full
cost.
Why
don't
the
other
landowners
chip
in
when
those
platform
done?
J
Well,
that
no
problem
I'm
very
happy
to
answer
the
question.
The
way
that
we
build
in
Laredo
is
that
if
you
have
development
that
encompasses
a
road
that
you're
responsible
for
building
the
road,
we
do
it
that's
the
way
that
you
know
I,
there's
there's
different
ways
to
do
it
and
that's
definitely
in
the
plans
in
the
future.
But
the
current
way
that
we
build
roads
is
if,
if
your
parcel
incorporates
that
that
you
should
include
that,
that
is
your
responsibility.
J
L
J
L
L
L
He
died
in
June
of
2019
and
you
know-
and
he
was
a
good
man
and
he
always
stepped
forward
and
probably
would
I
would
assume
knowing
mr.
Mejia
he
would
have
shown
up
and
probably
would
have
objected
to
you
adding
on
a
road
that
takes
out
20%
of
the
property
and
now
we're
hoping
the
landowner
to
an
amendment
that
was
done
at
the
last
minute
on
a
modification
that
really
everybody
would
have
approved.
But
we-
and
this
is
before
your
time
in
Kirby-
that
type
of
big
modification
for
a
billboard.
L
J
L
L
L
This
is
what
we
wanted
the
long
term
and
in
if
we
can't
throw
in
these
big
restrictions
when
people
come
in
just
to
put
up
a
billboard
like
I,
don't
think
it's
right
to
change
a
master
plan
for
just
a
billboard,
and
now
we
want
to
hold
him
to
the
billboard
when
their
representative
was
sick
and
he
died
two
months
later,
it
just
doesn't
seem
like
fundamental
fair
play
with
what
our
process
or
our
role
and
the
the
whole
situation
should
be.
I
just
think
it's
wrong.
L
J
J
But
is
it
your
responsibility
as
staff
to
to
look
at
the
rules
and
and
to
provide
a
recommendation
for
you
of
what
is
the
best
practice
when
we
don't
have
a
rule
specifically
States
at
or
when
the
rule
specifically
states
to
advise
you
what
the
rules
are
now
when
we
catch
that,
doesn't
make
the
rule
any
less
valid.
The
fact
that
these
roads
were
always
required,
we're
always
part
of
the
plan
and
that
staff
may
have
the
previous
staff
before
me
may
not
have
caught
it
until
the
last
time
they
submitted.
J
The
master
plan
for
an
update
doesn't
make
it
any
less
right.
It
may
be
something
that's
later
in
the
master
plan,
but
it
doesn't
either
as
writer.
It's
not
right
either
that
road
should
be
there
or
it
shouldn't
be
there
when
it
came
out
that
the
road
was
needed
there
to
me
is
less
of
the
question.
Then
is
it
right
that
a
road
should
be
there
is
a
road
needed
there
and
was
a
road
always
in
the
plants
there,
and
my
answer
to
those
three
questions
are
yes,.
A
Kirby
Kirby,
let
me
just
go
ahead
and
ask
you
one
thing:
I
mean.
Obviously
this
is
a
five
acre
tract
I
believe
you
guys
were
asking
for
a
forty
nine
foot
back
to
back
Street
to
go
through
there,
but
in
that
requirement
on
a
five
acre
tract
kills
the
project.
You
know
that
cost
is
prohibitive
that
doesn't
work
so
I
mean
in
light
of
looking
at
these
things.
We
have
to
look
at
the
economic
point
of
view
also
to
make
it
will
this
make
or
break
a
project?
A
You
know
when
you
put
that
kind
of
a
requirement
on
a
project
like
this.
You
just
broke
a
project.
It's
not
going
to
go
anywhere,
you
know
it's
just
not
feasible.
It's
not
a
feasible
thing
to
develop.
So
what
we're
going
to
be
left
with
would
probably
be
the
same
slum
area
that
is
there
now
nothing,
but
a
bunch
of
tires,
a
bunch
of
junk
trucks
that
are
in
there
and
the
only
ones
that
are
using.
A
This
is
a
guy
who
wants
it
really
for
his
own
convenience,
because
you've
got
seven
warehouses
on
and
got
the
road
and
you've
got
three
on
general
Milton.
Those
warehouses
have
been
there
for
a
long
time
and
they
knew
that
they're
in
and
out
where
you
got
the
road
and
general
Milton,
not
this
little
shortcut
that
somebody
decided
to
start
using.
C
I
I
agree:
a
hundred
percent
with
your
comment
and
Commissioner
Kay's
comment:
I,
feel
that,
like
we
I
speak
for
myself
and
for
Commissioner
Kay's,
we
we
agree
that
the
burden
shouldn't
be
bested
on
on
the
particularly
developer
and
I'm
for
purposes
of
time.
I
am
ready
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
deleting
the
condition
by
staff.
I
I
A
E
E
G
G
C
G
J
You
abstained.
That's
totally
your
choice.
Nobody
is
telling
you
to
abstain
and
I'm
I,
just
I
thought,
because
you
have
stained
last
time
you
were
gonna
stain
again
and
typically
when
you
abstain,
you're
you're
not
commenting
on
the
item
as
well,
but
if
you
want,
if
you
don't
want
to
abstain,
you
don't
have
to
it's
entirely
up
to
you.
This.
L
Just
want
you
to
know
that
city
of
Laredo
regular.
He
has
lawsuits
in
the
460
District
Court,
and
that
would
be
a
conflict
conflict
as
well,
but
it
still
happens
and
so
I.
Don't
necessarily
think
that
you
have
to
abstain
just
because
your
brother
happens
and
being
him
an
employee
at
a
company.
But
you
can
talk
to
the
city
attorney
about
that.
A
K
The
applicant
is
killing
development
limited.
The
engineer
of
record
is
crane
engineering,
it's
2.0,
85,
two
acres
of
land
located
east
of
FM
1472
and
north
of
killer
Mendoza
Boulevard,
the
zoning
is
m1
proposed,
use
commercial
and
dedication
of
right
away,
and
it's
proposed
one
lot.
This
area
can
be
found
at
the
intersection
of
Mines
and
Killam
industrial
aerial
view
street
view
ii
as
planted,
and
the
proposed
replant.
A
P
E
P
Laredo
and
we're
also
working
in
conjunction
with
the
tech
stock
proposed
whitey
to
the
mines,
Road
that
goes
further
south
and
north
south
of
the
PLM
Industrial
Boulevard.
This
is
an
RMA
project
and
and
the
intent
mr.
white
and
Gilliam.
The
news
here
is
to
also
widen
the
ride
away
from
120
foot,
with
an
additional
ten
book
right
away.
Dedication
to
allow
for
the
relocation
of
the
existing
utilities
that
are
located
along,
kill
them,
kill
them
inductor,
I'm.
Sorry!
So
at
this
point
the
comments
we
have
seven
comments
from
planning
and
from
engineering.
P
We
do
concur
with
those
comments.
At
this
point.
We
have
been
coordinating
this
project
continuously
with
the
city,
especially
regarding
access
to
the
that
this
property
and
there's
a
lot
of
engineering
work
already
accomplished
by
the
RMA
engineer,
HNC
be
regarding
that
ability,
there's.
No,
our
coordination
already
with
tech
start
when
it
comes
to
access
and
with
the
city
traffic
engineer,
and
so
some
of
this
information
already
provided
in
our
initial
submittal.
So
at
this
point,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
G
A
I
G
A
A
K
D
D
A
A
K
N
A
K
C
E
A
F
G
D
J
J
We
haven't
been
directed
otherwise,
but
I,
anticipate
that
maybe
in
the
next
month
or
two
we
might
go
back
to
meeting
in
person,
but
again
we're
going
to
take
our
direction
from
City
Council
and
the
direction
they
give
for
boards
and
committees,
but
it
is
looking
like
we
will
transition
back
to
that
rather
than
the
next
I
would
say
one
or
two
months
and
I.
Don't
know
if
this
has
been
I
would
be
curious
to
hear
from
the
Commission.
If
this
has
been.
L
I
really
like
it
and
I
think
the
attendance
of
everybody,
even
though
Commissioner
Lugo
is
there
hanging
out
in
his
unit,
probably
or
his
car,
but
I
think
the
interaction
has
worked
out
better
and-
and
it's
made
us
study
up
a
little
bit
more
ahead
of
time.
By
doing
it,
this
way
and
I
think
it's
been
better
for
everybody
off
for
all
around
I.
Think.
J
The
normal
amount
of
public
input
that
we
get
when
we
just
have
a
limited
number
of
callin
lines
and
staff
and
then
being
able
to
get
it
on
and
then
be
able
to
hear
you
or
participate
in
the
meeting.
So
that's
the
biggest
challenge
so,
like
I,
said
we'll
take
our
direction
from
Council
I'm,
not
sure
where
they're
gonna
go.
But
I
was
just
anticipating
that
within
a
month
or
two
we
and.
F
J
The
case
we
will
certainly
make
provisions
for
everybody
participate
whether
they
have
to
be
there
physically
or
not.
So
if
we
do
end
up
meeting
in
person
at
whatever
time
and
and
one
of
the
Commission
doesn't
feel
comfortable
doing,
that
will
we'll
do
our
best
to
make
provisions
that
you
can
call
in
which
is
typically
always
an
option.
I
know
some
of
you
in
the
past
have
been
away
in
the
business
but
offered
to
call
in,
and
that's
always
an
option.
J
Finally,
I
just
want
to
say
that
it
we
don't
as
staff.
We
know
you
don't
always
follow
recommendations,
but,
as
was
the
case,
they
we
entirely
respect
the
decisions
of
the
Commission
and
we
feel
just
our
responsibility
to
give
you
the
best
information
possible
I,
try
not
to
be
biased
just
to
follow
what
the
rules
are,
and
so
we'll
continue
to
do
that,
but
but
of
course,
always
understand
that
this
commission
can
make
its
own
decision
and
should
or
make
a
recommendation
to
Council.
So
thank
you
again
very
much
everyone
for
your
service.