►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 092123
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 092123
C
E
A
E
A
You
can
open
up
the
public
hearing
and
move
on
to
the
public
hearing
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
item,
6A
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
map
of
the
sale
Laredo
by
rezoning
lot.
Seven
and
Lot
8
block
2084
Eastern
Division,
located
at
1802
and
1804
milk
street
from
R3
mixed
residential
district
to
B1,
limited
business
district.
A
B
B
E
A
E
I
F
A
B
288
Eastern
Division,
located
at
801
Clark
Boulevard
The
Zone
questions
from
a
B1
to
a
B3.
The
purple
host
used
commercial,
a
freestanding,
on-premise
signage
letter
sent
28
against
one
background
on
September
11th
of
2023.
An
inspection
was
conducted
and
revealed
the
citation
was
issued
at
this
property
due
to
installing
a
sign
without
a
permit
location.
B
A
L
Hello,
my
name
is
Jorge
Castillo
and
I
live
right
behind
where
our
teammates
and
if
you
change
it
to
a
B3,
that's
gonna,
erect
the
the
whole
neighborhood
as
it
is
right
now,
I'm
having
problems
with
them,
because
something
happened
with
the
planning
there
and
all
my
yard
is
full
of
water
every
time
it
rains
and
I
don't
know
what
to
do,
but
supposedly
the
they
install
the
pump
to
let
the
water
out
somewhere.
It's
killing
somebody
else
and
it's
killing
me
because
they
tell
me
to
go
fishing
there
any
any
day.
L
A
E
A
A
E
M
A
F
E
A
A
So
we
have
a
motion
not
to
support
the
zone,
change
recommend
not
to
support
the
zone
change
by
commissioner
Garcia
second
by
commissioner.
All
in
favor
aye
against
motion
carries
moving
on
to
item
6E
and
many.
The
zoning
ordinance
map
of
the
City
of
Laredo
by
rezoning
Lots
3
and
4
block
923
Eastern
Division,
located
at
1715
Rosario
street
from
R1
single-family
residential
district
to
R2
multi-family
residential
district.
B
B
B
A
A
K
Hernandez
I
live
in
1802
Rosario
this
afternoon,
I
went
down
the
block
to
block
street
blocks
and
I
asked
just
about
every
neighbor
they're
all
against
it,
and
the
reason
is
because
the
way
they
handle
it,
you
know
not
getting
a
permit,
they
bought
the
house
next
to
it
and
they
got
the
permit
for
that
and
they
kind
of.
Like
said,
okay,
you
know
the
neighbor
said:
I'll
sell
you
the
house.
Okay,
next
thing,
you
know
it,
they
did
three
units
already
it's
ready
to
go,
but
we're
totally
against
it.
A
N
F
F
A
O
A
F
A
F
L
P
J
J
Just
directly
north
of
the
of
the
of
the
building
itself
is
a
is
a
commercial
kitchen
currently
occupied
by
Taco
mice
and
directly
west.
To
us
exactly
one
block
away
is
a
commercial
kitchen.
That's
occupied
by
LISD
I,
don't
see
how
it
can
negatively
impact
the
community
in
any
in
any
way,
totally
opposed
to
that
I
mean
it's.
It's
bringing
the
property
value
a
little
bit
higher
it's
putting
money
into
the
community.
J
J
You
know
on
behalf
of
Mr
Casey
I'd
like
to
apologize,
because
he
actually
did
things
maybe
a
little
bit
backwards
than
he
should
have,
but
you
know
we're
here
to
try
to
make
things
directly
or
try
to
take
the
appropriate
steps
to
to
to
modify
whatever
needs
to
be
done
according
to
to
the
city,
but
as
far
as
the
the
planning
or
the
area
itself,
I
think
that
it
you
know
it
really
would
not
affect
anyone
around
what
goes
on
inside
that
that
current
building.
So
that's
thank.
A
Q
Good
evening,
members
of
the
commission,
my
name
is
Zita
Vela
I'm
next
door
to
this
proposed
kitchen,
and
my
husband,
Tony
Bella,
is
here
with
me.
I
am
here
to
strongly
disagree
with
the
commercial
kitchen
that
is
being
that
I
Rose
next
to
my
home.
I
also
am
across
the
street
from
this
from
the
with
rental
homes.
From
this
from
this
kitchen,
the
kind
of
business
that
would
most
definitely
have
a
negative
impact
on
all
of
us,
homeowners
and
the
entire
neighborhood.
Q
Q
Q
He
if
he
would
have
been
on
the
up
and
up
and
not
do
this
clandestly
I
think
that
everything
might
have
worked
out
for
him.
But
I
strongly
disagree
with
the
fact
that
we
should
have
something
commercial
I
could
have
had
something
commercial
done
also,
but
I
respected
the
neighborhood.
So
that's
why
I
have
rental
homes
and
to
have
rental
my
houses
parked
with
cars
all
the
time
I'm
not
going
to
be
able
to
sell
I
also
need
to
eat.
Q
So
you
know
it's
in
the
fact
that
he
does
not
have
permits
and
the
fact
that
I
have
followed
this.
Since
the
Inception
of
this
I
called
the
office
many
times,
I
mean
everything
all
my
claims
went
to
the
Wayside
I
have
documents.
I
have
pictures.
They've
worked
all
night
all
day
this.
They
will
never
follow.
Once
you
open
this
they'll
it.
This
will
become
a
new
body
of
of
a
business
I
mean
there's
the
delivery
trucks
that
are
on
the
street.
Q
He
has
lied
about
the
fact
that
he
was
a
just
a
just
making
spices,
also
the
when
I've
called
to
the
to
the
city
and
planning
not
not
now,
but
in
the
latter
years,
I
Came
Upon
inspectors
who
were
just
like
as
a
matter
of
fact.
You
know
that
they
were
upgrading
things
and
not
noticing
he
doesn't
even
have
a
water
meter
he's
running
the
water
from
the
Little
House
in
all
intent.
He
intended
to
use
the
little
house
to
start
off
the
business
there.
Q
So
I
mean
this
has
been
a
very
hard
having
to
go
through
and
I
was
very
happy
with
the
fact
that
you
all
supported
the
fact
that
our
neighborhood
needs
to
stay
as
a
neighborhood
and
be
respected
as
that
when
he
had
all
of
the
opportunities
to,
and
he
is
not
one
that
should
be
shy
about
this.
He
has
three
businesses
so
I'm
sure
that
he
knows
all
of
the
things
that
were
required,
especially
permits
when
you're
transporting
food
from
one
area
to
the
it
is
not
permitted.
Q
I
know
that
it
couldn't
happen
between
two
stores
that
were
owned
by
the
same
people.
So
I
mean
he
is
transporting
Foods
the
fact
that
someone
went
to
check
it.
It
is
wrong.
The
information
that
came
out
in
the
news
is
not
wrong,
because
I
made
I
was
the
one
making.
The
the
claims
to
this
and
I
was
very
ill
treated
by
311.
Q
Also
because
this
could
have
all
stopped
September
21st
when
I
made
the
call,
but
it
was
just
taken
to
the
Wayside
and
I
was
really
taken
aback
by
the
fact
that
there
were
some
just
Bad
actors
along
the
way
and
because
this
did
not
have
to
happen
and
UI
people.
The
city
should
not
be
involved
in
something
such
as
this
I
mean
it's
just
just
Reckless
disregard
on
his
part
when
he
is
he's
a
business
owner
and
he's
not
just
the
one
he's
had.
Q
L
A
R
Hello,
Diana,
Hernandez
I,
don't
know
if
you
remember
I,
don't
know
if
you
remember
me
from
the
previous
meeting
I.
Second
everything
that
Ms
Bella
said
you
know
all
of
these
things
were
done
not
in
the
proper
order.
I
know
that
I
I
started
calling.
My
first
call
was
August
20th,
not
September
20th.
That
was
a
whole
month
prior
to
oh,
in
August,
Oh,
I
thought,
I
heard
September
20th,
okay,
since
August
20th
and
after
the
fire
I
mean
you.
R
We
have
no
intention
of
using
it
for
anything
else
and
it
was
never
used
for
residential
purposes.
I'm
sorry,
it
was
always
a
storage
for
tacos
kisi
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
I,
don't
know
how
it
became
a
kitchen
and
they
were
cooking.
There.
I
know
that
when
they
had
the
fire
it
was
noted
that
they
did
not
have
a
certificate
of
occupancy.
R
We
don't
know
exactly
how
all
of
the
you
know.
All
of
the
purpose
were
given,
because
the
information
that
he
supplied
at
initially
said
that
there
was
going
to
be
no,
no
water,
no
electricity
and
no
no
Plumbing,
no
electricity
and
no
gas,
and
apparently
they
were
connected.
I
I,
don't
know
if
he
got
the
permits.
As
she
said,
he
is
a
businessman
he
should
know.
R
Another
thing
is
that
you
know
parking
parking.
There
is
no
parking
for
them,
there's
usually
people
when
they
were
occupying
it
as
a
commercial
kitchen,
there
were
seven,
eight
or
more
cars
and
they
were
all
aligned
parked
along
the
side
of
the
street
on
Sanders,
both
sides
of
the
street
and
on
the
sidewalk.
So
if
you
wanted
to
walk,
you
had
to
get
in
the
middle
of
the
street,
because
there
there
was
no
way
they're
on
the
sidewalk.
So
that's
another
issue:
18
wheelers,
now
we
have
18
wheelers
going
to
deliver.
R
R
So
that's
you
know,
that's
another
issue,
and
also
there
was
one
time
that
an
18-wheeler
was
going
south
on
Sanders,
probably
delivered,
and
he
was
going
trying
to
turn
on
Travis
and
it
got
stuck
because
those
streets
are
very
narrow
and
it
got
stuck
there
in
the
street
again
again
was
blocked
for
like
two
hours
or
more.
So
that's
a
big
issue
and
property
value.
So
does
that
mean
our
property
value
is
going
to
go
up
as
well,
because
that's
one
thing
that
Mr
Grafton
mentioned
right
and
I
just
just
wanted
to.
R
Personal
reasons
decided
against
it
and
I
have
their
signatures
as
well,
but
I'm
not
going
to
share
it
because
I
told
I
called
him
and
I
told
him,
don't
worry
about
it,
I'm
not
going
to
use
your
names.
Thank
you,
but
I
mean
I'm,
not
the
only
one
she's,
not
the
only
one
I
had
no
idea.
She
was
going
to
be
here,
but
there
are
other
people
residents,
people
who
actually
live
in
the
area
that
are
concerned.
We
also
don't
want
to
explode.
A
S
T
A
E
A
N
Only
thing
I
wanted
to
clarify
is
I.
Think
like
like
the
episode,
the
item
that
was
stated
before
this
one,
that
a
lot
of
people
don't
know
that
they
have
to
go
in
and
do
certain
procedures,
I
know
or
certain
rules
or
standards.
So
I
know
if
I
would
be
a
neighbor
there
and
there's
a
fire,
and
all
of
that
of
course
I
would
be
afraid
and
of
of
having
something
like
that
again.
But
right
now,
Mr
I,
don't
know.
I
remember
his
name
said
was
he's
very:
is
foreign.
N
N
A
F
F
A
F
P
Trust
owner
we
are
Verde,
Corpus
applicants
and
Protestants
engineering
is
representative
property
location.
Approximately
25.150
Acres,
located
north
of
people's
Boulevard
and
west
of
Aransas
Pass
Drive
zone
change.
Request
is
from
an
R1
to
an
r1a
proposed
uses
residential
letter
sent
for
103,
and
we
have
none
forward.
None
against.
K
U
Was
Zone
business
long
long
time
ago,
during
a
different
master
plan,
we've
subsequently
brought
in
a
revised
master
plan
that
this
commission
has
approved.
That
shows
us
as
residential
and
as
a
matter
of
fact,
we
about
a
month
or
two
two
ago
we
brought
in
a
preliminary
plot
for
this
exact
area
as
a
as
a
residential
subdivision.
A
P
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
for
the
record.
We
have
applicant
Julio,
C
Pequeno
as
applicant
and
owner
property
location,
not
7
and
8
block
817
Eastern
Division,
located
at
1520
Cortez
Street
zone
change.
Request
is
from
an
R3
to
a
B3
proposed
uses.
Car
Lot
letter
sent
were
40
and
then
four
none
against
location
view
street
view.
I'm,
sorry,
aerial
view
street
view,
zone
change,
signage,
zoning
map,
future
land
use
map
and
the
recommendation
is
Staff
does
not
support
and
the
proposed
motion.
A
W
W
History
of
this,
the
previous
owner
was
trying
to
get
the
whole
area
there
into
a
zoom
or
a
business
Zone,
and
we
went
before
the
city
council
three
times
and
it
was
negated
now.
Mr
Pequeno
has
bought
the
property
and
he
and
I
met,
and
we
don't
have
a
problem
as
long
as
that
lot
is
in
and
out
on,
Meadow
Street
as
long
as
the
house
that
faces
Cortez
and
that
same
property
does
not
become
business.
W
The
the
biggest
concern
we
had
in
the
past
was
because
of
the
traffic
that
goes
through
Cortez
they're
trying
to
circum
navigate
the
traffic
light
on
Market,
so
they
come
through
Cortez.
We
don't
need
any
more
traffic
on
there.
So
as
long
as
it
stays
on
metal,
we
don't
have
a
problem.
Mr,
Pequeno
and
I
have
discussed
it
and
we
don't
have
a
problem
with
that.
As
long
as
the
house
is
not
commercial.
E
Well,
we
I
was
just
asking
Miss
Guerra
that
if,
in
order
to
put
conditions
to
it,
we'd
have
to
do
a
conditional
use
permit.
If
we
just
do
a
zone
change,
it
doesn't
allow
us
to
to
Really
enforce
anything.
So
that's
where
the
the
suggestion
you're
making
it'd
be
hard
for
us
to
enforce
that,
because
once
he
has
the
B3
there's
no
real
other
than
maybe
traffic
department
or
somebody
working
with
them.
But.
A
K
A
A
D
Good
evening
my
name
is
Julio
Pagano,
Jr
and
I'm
in
favor.
This
is
my
property.
The
reason
why
I've
been
trying
to
change
this
is
because
I
want
to
bring
Carla
to
the
to
the
to
the
area
and
the
entrance
that
I
have
right
now
at
the
moment,
it's
not
a
business
right
now.
It's
like
a
residential,
actually
I
have
two
houses
there
and
they're.
D
D
It's
on
metal
and
I,
don't
see
why
we
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
get
this
through
if
through
metal,
there's
hundreds
of
businesses
right
next
to
me,
even
through
Cortez,
there's
two
blocks
from
there's:
there's
a
funeral
home
there's
a
park
and
there's
also
a
a
restaurant.
There
I
believe
it's
a
yogurt
place
or
something,
but
it's
a
restaurant,
so
I
don't
see
a
reason
why
it
wouldn't
be.
D
D
Yes,
well
the
wall
that
picture
they
have
right
there,
it
was
made
on
the
computer.
I
tried
my
best,
but
next
to
it
on
market
and
and
metal.
We
have
the
gas
station
Sunrise,
it's
been
there
for
many
years
and
then
it's
my
property
slot,
seven
and
eight
right
in
the
corner.
Those
two
houses
right
there
on
the
left
side
in
front
of
Cortes,
it's
the
same
property
and
then
I
have
there's
already
a
like
a
metal,
a
you.
D
Can
you
can
call
it
and
that's
more
or
less
what
I
wanted
to
do?
It's
a
it
will
be
a
smart
car
that
maybe,
where
maybe
eight
cars,
maybe
eight
or
ten
cars,
the
most
that
can
fit
in
that
area.
It's
a
big
property,
but
not
enough
for
a
large
large
car
lot,
but
the
entrance
as
you
can
see
it's
through
metal
and
I,
already
have
the
gate
there
and
then
I
already
placed
under
the
gate
between
the
house
and
the
rest
of
the
property
there.
D
So
there's
no
there's
no
way
we
can
go
through
there
anymore,
because
I
already
blocked
it
and
that's
my
plan
right
there
I
mean
it's
not
a
piece
of
art
but
I
try
my
best
just
to
give
you
guys
a
little
heads
up,
but
it's
through
metal
I
know
the
property.
The
address
is
on
Cortez,
but
it's
the
that.
Oh
it's
on
metal
already.
F
D
G
We
give
if
we
change
the
boundary
and
you
decide
five
years,
not
to
sell
it.
It
already
underneath
the
whole
property
regardless.
If
you
tell
him
to
make
a
deal,
I'll
Make,
A
Deal,
they
can
break
it
in
a
month.
I
prefer
that
you
know
I
just
deny
come
back
with
the
additionally
experiment,
condition
your
permit
and
put
the
boundaries
there.
I
don't
have
problems
with
it
and
you're
right.
That
would
be
perfect.
G
G
E
H
E
A
G
G
W
A
G
L
A
H
B
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
for
the
record
applicant
is
the
NH
Rentals
LLC
owner
edwardi
Garcia
PE
CFM
applicant
representative
property
description,
approximately
1.5,
acre
truck
of
land
located
south
of
State
Highway,
359
and
west
of
Veterans
Boulevard.
The
zone
change
request
is
from
an
R1
to
an
M1.
The
proposed
uses
industrial
letter
sent
24-0
against
zero
location
view
aerial
view,
street
view,
zone
change,
signage,
zoning
overview,
future
land,
use
staff
recommendations,
staff
supports
a
proposed
zone
change
proposed
motion.
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
thank.
T
L
H
A
All
in
favor
aye
against
motion
carries
moving
on
to
item
6L
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
map
of
the
Silverado
by
authorizing
the
issuance
of
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
warehouse
trucking
company
on
lot
three
block:
one
Stacy
Allison
young
subdivision
and
approximately
0.1928
acre
track
of
land
out
of
1161.66
acre
track
out
of
4127
Webb
County
Texas
of
record
and
volume,
209
Pages,
47-49,
Webb
County.
Indeed,
Records
located
at
3804,
Casablanca,
Lake,
Road
and
North
of
East
Saunders,
Street
and
West
of
Casablanca
Lake
Road.
B
Thank
you,
Mr
Sherman
for
the
record
applicant
is
Young,
fall
properties,
LTD
owner
Victor,
J,
Linares,
applicant
representative
property
description,
lot,
three
block
one
Stacy
Allison
young
subdivision
and
approximately
0.1928
acre
located
at
3804
Casablanca,
Lake,
Road
and
North
of
East
Saunders
and
west
of
Casablanca
Lake
Road.
The
zone
change
request
is
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
warehouse,
trucking
company.
B
I
L
E
I
On
the
letter
itself,
we
we
are
designating
the
amount
of
traffic,
which
is
a
five
18
wheelers
we're
even
promoting
also
the
height
of
the
structure
and
such
and
and
pretty
much.
We
have
all
those
items
indicated
also
the
hours
of
operation
where
we
spoke
with
the
with
the
potential
owner,
where
Monday
through
Friday
8
to
5,
was
pretty
much
that
this
trick
operation
that
they'll
function
for
this
property
I
do
have
one
minor
update.
I
Just
in
the
letter,
if
I
may
I,
just
I
do
want
to
include
this
item
in
there
on
the
on
the
part
of
the
narrative.
We
identify
that
pretty
much
there's
an
owner
and
and
there's
a
potential
buyer.
The
potential
buyer
is
the
one
who
will
be
using
the
cup
specifically
I.
Just
do
one
Amanda
correct
the
letter
that
was
submitted
to
to
planning
if,
if
I
could
correct
the
LLC
to
which
is.
F
I
E
F
G
I
M
Good
evening
I'm
Daniel
Villarreal
I
represent
the
the
current
owners
of
the
property.
I
would
like
to
approve
the
conditional
use,
permit
the
families
own
that
property
for
many
many
years
before
it
was
leased
to
the
state
due
to
some
unperceived
circumstances.
It
had
a
stigmatism,
we
tore
down
the
building
and
the
property's
been
sitting
there.
Vacant
we've
tried
to
sell
it
as
a
commercial
piece
of
property.
Unfortunately,
you
know
the
family
being
stuck
with
a
piece
of
property.
They
need
to
do
something
with
it.
M
They
were
approached
by
we've
got
a
truck
driving
school
recently
and
they
were
told
there's
the
property
itself
is
already
under
contract.
When
we
applied
for
the
first
zone
change,
we
understood
completely
why
it
was
denied.
We
do
we
understand
that
once
it
was
sold,
other
types
of
businesses
that
are
maybe
not
favorable
would
be
put
there
and
we
understood
so
we
applied
for
the
conditional
use.
Permit
I
think
it
would
be.
M
You
know,
in
the
best
interest
for
the
family
and
even
for
the
city,
because,
if
not
I
mean
it's
just
I,
don't
want
to
see
the
family
say.
Well,
we
need
to
do
something
with
it.
I
know
believe
they
can
use
it
as
actual
truck
parking.
People
have
been
parking,
their
trucks
there
for
years
without
permission,
but
we
allowed
it.
They
parked
across
the
street
in
a
dirt
lot
as
well.
M
A
O
F
H
F
A
Moving
on
to
item
6m,
how
many
of
the
zoning
organs
map
The
Accelerated
by
rezoning,
approximately
5208.33
square
feet,
track
of
land
being
the
south
of
50
feet
of
lot?
One
and
the
South
50
feet
of
the
West
half
of
Lot
2
block
243
Eastern
Division,
the
city
Laredo
Texas,
being
situated
in
survey
799,
abstract,
239,
City,
Laredo,
Webb,
County
Texas,
located
at
1713
Marseille
Avenue
from
R3
mixed
residential
district
to
r1a,
single-family,
reduced
area
District.
P
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
for
the
record.
We
have
the
applicant
Maria
Dolores
balance
owner
director,
J
Dean
Victor,
J
linatis
as
applicant
representative
property
location,
approximately
5208.33
square
feet
track
of
land
located
at
1713
Marcia
Avenue
zone
change,
requested
from
an
R3
to
r1a
proposed
use,
is
residential
letter
sent
were
52.
We
have
none
for
and
none
against
location
view
aerial
view
street
view,
zone
change,
signage.
Y
Z
Commissioner
engineering,
we
are
in
favor,
oh
sorry,
good
evening,
we
are
in
favor
to
answer
the
mom's
question.
The
the
owner
wants
to
obtain
a
demo
permit
demo
the
current
house,
because
it
is
in
bad
condition
and
then
just
bring
back
another
single
family
dwelling.
Okay,
it's
just
just
for
permanent
purposes.
We
just
don't
meet
the
conditions
under
an
R3,
so
we're
asking
for
the
r1a
okay.
F
A
Y
N
A
We
have
a
motion
to
support
Second
in
a
second.
All
in
favor,
aye
against
motion
carries
moving
on
to
item
six
n
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
map
of
the
state
Laredo
by
rezone,
approximately
8.04
acre
track
of
land
out
of
a
track
of
land
conveyed
to
San
Ysidro
Northeast
limited
described
indeed
recorded
in
volume,
1450
Pages,
868
874
and
volumes
3355,
Pages,
170,
178
deed
records,
Webb
County,
Texas,
located
south
of
one
escutia
Boulevard
and
west
of
cavantina
Drive
from
our
one
single
family,
residential
district
to
R2,
multi-family
residential
district.
B
Owner
skg
homes,
not
nine
LLC,
has
the
applicant
Oscar
Castillo
PE
is
representative.
The
property
description
is
approximately
8.04
Acres
truck
of
land
located
south
of
Juan
is
Boulevard
and
west
of
Drive.
There's
one
teacher
questions
from
an
R1
to
an
R2
proposed
uses.
Townhomes
letter
sent
26
4-0
against
zero
location
view
aerial
view,
street
view,
zone
change,
signage
zoning
overview,
future
land
use
staff
organization
staff
supports
the
proposed
zone,
change
cover
host
motion.
Thank
you.
Mr
chairman
thank.
A
A
We
have
a
motion
to
close
public
hearing,
supports
staff's
recommendation
for
zone
change.
We
have
a
second
by
commissioner
Garcia.
All
in
favor
aye
against
motion
carry
we're
moving
on
to
consideration
of
the
following
preliminary
flats
and
preliminary
replats
moving
on
to
item
seven,
a
preliminary
consideration
of
the
replied
of
lot:
one
block
two
Pinnacle
industry,
Center
FM
1472
unit
11
into
lot
1A
and
lot
1B
block
2,
Pinnacle
industry,
Center,
FM,
1472
unit
11.
The
tent
is
industrial.
C
C
A
AB
A
AA
F
A
C
AC
C
AB
AD
AD
Yes,
the
the
intents
to
do:
multi-family,
okay,
at
least
that's
the
the
intent
at
this
point
like
he
just
want
to
do
that
so,
like
the
the
property
around
the
new
property
line,
should
kind
of
be
like,
where
there's
this
little
retaining
wall
towards
the
back
of
the
wishy-washy.
So
that's
where
the
Parkland
is
going
to
be
and
the
this
New
Lots
can
be
facing.
Okay,.
N
A
A
AB
K
AB
AB
H
AD
AB
Just
east
of
Galleria
Galleria
subdivision
phase,
one
right
and
the
public
Street
there
we
go
right
there.
Public
Street
comes
down,
maybe
about
400
feet,
and
so
we're
going
to
cul-de-sack
it
there
so
it'll
be
public.
So
it
won't
be
part
of
a
lot.
It's
just
a
street.
So
for
the
turnaround
for
the
public.
AB
AB
AB
AC
A
C
T
Good
evening,
Alfredo
Martinez
with
crane
engineering
on
behalf
of
the
owner,
we
concur
with
most
of
the
comments
we
did
want
to
ask
for
the
removal
of
comment.
Number
two
Under
Fire
of
that
specific
Road
there,
it's
a
it's
another
property
owned
by
somebody
else,
and
our
plat
will
be
having
access
through
359.
T
V
AC
A
C
A
E
AB
Good
evening
topside
civil
group
on
behalf
of
the
client,
we
concur
with
all
of
staff's
comments
except
number
one.
If
we
can
further
discuss
this
I
know
it's
a
long
comment,
but
I
guess.
Let
me
let
me
read
it
just
for
the
record.
The
landowner
of
the
West
need
more
Dolores,
LLC
and
and
to
the
landowner
to
I'm
sorry,
the
landowner.
The
West
need
more
of
the
lotus
loc
and
to
the
landowner
to
the
east.
AB
So
agenda
item
8B
reconsideration
of
skg
Columbia
Industrial,
Park
North,
which
is
right
after
this.
This
item
have
been
in
discussions
with
tech
stock
regarding
access
to
State,
Highway
255,
which
is
known
as
Camino
Colombia
Road,
coordinate
with
coordinate
with
said
adjacent
landowners
and
tech
stocks
to
ensure
safe
access
to
State,
Highway
255
can
be
achieved
for
all,
thereby
reducing
traffic
impacts
and
the
number
of
connections
to
said
Highway
Solutions
may
include
the
development
of
a
cross
street
that
connects
all
three
developments
provide
evidence
of
coordination
during
the
One-Stop
shop
process.
AB
AB
AB
Here
we
go
so
our
original
plat
had
two
cul-de-sacs
the
during
that
process.
We
had
comments
from
the
city
that
stated
to
provide
access
either
to
the
West
land
owner
and
the
Northland
owner.
So
what
we
did
was
instead
of
doing
this
cul-de-sac
on
this
side,
we
extended
this
Road
North
to
have
so
that
the
future
landowners
can
have
access
off
of
this
road.
We
had
kept
this
cul-de-sac
on
the
on
the
East
side.
This
preliminary
plot
was
approved
with
the
road
going
north
and
the
cul-de-sac
on
the
East
side.
AB
This
reconsideration
is
just
removing
this
cul-de-sac.
There
seems
to
be
a
bigger
interest
on
bigger
Lots.
We
have
kept
the
road
that
the
city
requested
going
north
to
our
boundaries,
there's
also
a
10-foot
Reserve
strip
for
the
future.
The
reason
for
that
is
right
now:
there's
a
60-foot,
no
yeah
I'm,
sorry,
a
60-foot
easement
there
that
belongs
to
the
owner
on
the
West.
In
order
for
them
to
build
that
road,
they
would
need
a
70
foot
right
away
to
meet
the
minimum
standards
of
a
of
an
industrial
road.
AB
So
we
have
left
a
10-foot
Reserve
so
that
they
can
have
that
70
foot
in
the
future.
All
this
has
been
approved
in
the
original
preliminary
consideration.
The
reason
it
kind
of
makes
us
worry.
This
comment
and
I
understand
why
it's
on
there
it's
basically
to
coordinate
with
TxDOT
any
axis.
We
have
already
had
a
meeting
with
TxDOT
representatives
from
the
Needmore
Ranch
oops
representatives
from
the
Needmore
Ranch,
as
well
as
let
me
get
the
name
right.
Skg
Columbia,
which
Oscar
with
with
bewa,
is
here
as
well.
AB
In
the
in
those
discussions,
it
was
stated
that
you
know
we
explained
what
our
road
was
going
to
do.
It
was
going
to
go
north.
We
wanted
everybody
to
funnel
into
our
road
and
come
down
and
connect
to
State
Highway
255,
which
is
Columbia,
Road
and
kind
of
have
one
point
of
access
right.
However,
skg
does
have
their
own
their
own
Road
connecting
here
spacing
limits.
Side
distances,
meet
text,
Dot
specs.
AB
Now
it's
basically
our
job
to
go,
get
the
tech
stock
permit,
which,
just
to
clarify
comment,
number
five,
does
State
access
to
State,
Highway,
255
and
Mines
Road.
If
required
is
subject
to
review
and
approved
by
TxDOT,
which
that's
an
obvious
comment,
anytime,
we're
budding
a
a
state
highway
in
this
case,
this
is
kind
of
loaded,
provide
evidence
of
coordination
when
we
go
to
One
Stop
Shop.
Well,
we've
already
coordinated
with
TxDOT
we've
already
had
meetings
with
the
adjacent
landowners.
AB
So
it's
kind
of
just
a
broad
statement
that
from
here
at
this
point,
if
somebody
doesn't
want
to
coordinate
what
happens
right,
obviously
we're
only
responsible
on
what
we
do
within
our
with
our
own
boundaries,
anything
that
happens
after
that
either
they
have
to
come
to
this
commission
get
it
approved
and
they
have
to
go
to
techstart
and
get
their
own
driveway
approved.
So
that's
basically
our
reason.
Any
discussions
from
here
you
know
I'm
all
ears,
but
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
remove
that
if
staff's.
Okay
with
that.
X
X
X
The
one
for
the
lamentia
track,
which
is
the
westernmost
track-
they
have
not
come
in
yet,
but
they
have
expressed
interest
that
they
want
to
come
in
in
the
future,
so
are
just
concerned
and
we
have
been.
There
has
been
some
coordination
with
tech,
stud
and
we've
attended
those
meetings.
I
mean
it.
I
can't
say
for
sure
that
there
is
a
full
agreement
by
TxDOT.
They're
just
concerned
is
because
this
is
the
last
little
leg
of
255,
just
they're
they're
looking
out
for
the
future
interests.
Q
X
The
city
of
the
bridge-
and
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
coordination
does
occur
because
all
of
a
sudden,
everyone's
jumping
on
the
bandwagon
in
one
one
developer
came
in
then
the
other
one
and
then
now
another
one.
So
obviously
there's
an
interest
in
demand
for
this
area.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
is
on
the
same
page
and
again
they
do
comply
with
the
city
Laredo
subdivision
ordinances,
but
the
the
Mad.
The
key
here
is
Tech
stock
because
they
are
connecting
to
there
right
away.
So
ultimately
they
have
control.
X
AB
And
and
of
course,
comment
number
five
is
there,
but
anytime
again,
we
have
but
a
state
highway
that
comment's
always
there
that's
a
separate
approval
process.
We
still
have
to
submit
a
textile
driveway
permit
and
this
yeah
we
still
submit
a
driveway
permit.
Even
for
a
street
tie-in.
We
have
to
provide
a
traffic
impact
analysis
for
this
project
to
submit
to
text
Dot,
so
I
think
comment.
Five
covers
what
the
concern
is.
AB
Our
concern
is
it's
mainly
doing
something
before
One
Stop
Shop
right,
if
I'm,
ready
for
design
and
I
can
meet
the
next
One-Stop
shop
meeting,
which
is
next
Tuesday
or
two
weeks
after
that,
if
somebody
kind
of
delays,
coordination,
that's
kind
of
you
know,
we
can't
we
can
only
control
what's
within
our
own
boundaries
and
what's
within
within
our
own
powers,
not
to
say
that
we
do
not
want
to
coordinate.
We
definitely
do
we've
been
coordinating
for
the
last
month
on
all
this.
AB
There
seems
to
be
a
general
agreement
of
what
the
idea
is
for
the
area,
but
the
comment
you
know
provide
evidence.
I
have
evidence
of
a
meeting
that
we
had
30
days
ago.
What
I'm
worried
about
is
planning
really
isn't
that
One-Stop
shop
right,
they're
completely
different
departments.
So
how
do
they
take
that
note?
Is
it
hey
I
had
a
meeting
hey
minutes?
A
AB
AB
F
S
AB
Chairman
said
it
perfectly
this:
this
can
hinder
the
our
time
frame.
You
know
our
our
projected
submittal
to
One
Stop
Shop
is
in
three
weeks
all
right
with
fully
blown
plans.
You
know
the
developer
spending.
You
know
a
good
amount
of
time
money
on
this
investment,
and
this
again
this
comment.
While
we
understand
why
it's
there,
we
think
the
other
comment
from
techshot
is
the
cover
all
of
everything.
If
we
get
a
textile
Denial
on
that
project,
we
still
have
to
come
back
to
the
commission.
So
it's
not
like.
E
F
E
F
E
What
ends
up
happening
is
you?
Have
one
landowner
come
in
negotiates
with
Texas
another
landowner
and
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
kind
of
bring
them
all
together
and
try
to
master
plan
this,
because
this
is
the
beginning
of
possibly
a
new
community,
so
I
understand
and
we
will
will
be
there
on
a
phone
call
with
them
to
try
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
delay
them.
But
if,
if
we
don't
slow
down
it,
you
know
it's
it's
what's
going
to
happen.
E
Is
you're
just
going
to
have
a
bunch
of
warehouses
out
there
and
there
won't
be
the
the
access
points
are
going
to
be
different.
You're
going
to
have
a
little
bit
of
I
feel
it'll
be
out
of
control
a
little
bit.
You
know
and
then
we're
going
to
get
into
the
same
problem
that
we're
having,
because
these
are
Big
Parcels.
You
know:
we've
we've
already
received
an
application
for
900
000
square
feet
on
one
property,
so
that's
the
kind
of
sizes
we're
dealing
with
and
a
lot
of
trucks.
E
So
this
commission
is
actually
putting
these
developments
out
there
and
if
we
let
each
landowner
just
do
their
thing.
What's
the
big
picture
going
to
look
like
and
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
capture
big
picture
and
we're
lucky
enough
that
we
have
three
landowners
out
here
that
are
developers
they
understand
the
game.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
flow
works.
E
AB
E
N
N
Okay
and
my
issue
is
I
only
see
you
guys
exiting
to
255.,
you
guys
do
not
have
any
other
road
going
to
Mines
Road
and
it's
the
same
problem
that
we
had
in
Kilim.
That
makes
every
issue
come
down
to
my
road,
so
I
understand
why,
like
you
said
in
the
beginning,
Rick
like
I,
understand
why
you
put
it
there
because
you
are
starting
something
new
there
and
if
you
don't,
if
you
all,
don't
combine
and
join
and
be
nice
to
the
neighbor
and
prepare
and
prepare
all
your
outings
from
there
right.
N
I
remember
since
I
started
that
one
of
the
big
issues
is
that
you
have
to
have
two
entries.
It
was
an
emergency
comes
in
we're
talking
we're
not
talking
about
cars,
we're
talking
about
18
wheelers,
so
we
need
something
to
go
outside
Mines,
Road,
two
main
road
and
something
two
towards
the
the
bridge
and
in
peak
hours.
N
You
know
when,
when
an
emergency
comes
up
because
Colombia
bridge
is
only
I,
think
50
of
their
capacity
right,
it's
not
like
80
of
the
of
the
world
trade
Bridge,
so
I
understand
what
what
Orly
is
saying
and
I
know.
It's
a
little
bit
frustrating
for
you
guys
in
in
your
part,
but
the
city
needs
to
dot
their
eyes
and
cross
their
T's
because
they
don't
want
the
same
issue.
That.
AB
AB
AB
in
the
original
plat,
we
abided
by
what
the
city
wanted
and
that's
provide
an
access
to
our
neighbors
to
need
more
to
the
northern
Ranch
that
that's
thousands
of
Acres
that's
going
to
come
in
here,
so
we
opened
it
up
and
kind
of
said.
Hey
everybody
come
in
here
use
this
main
road
to
come
in
here
now,
whether
you
want
to
bypass
Mines
Road,
you
want
to
do
this.
The
the
the
other
reason
is
us
giving
the
10-foot
Reserve
is
for
that
road
to
go
to
go
to
Mines
Road.
AB
So
from
our
initial
submittal
to
where
we
are
now,
it's
we've
provided
future
access
points
with
the
proper
right
away
with
the
proper
Ingress
and
egress
for
this,
for
this
project,
I
think
all
Scott
being
on
the
corner.
He's
more
Standalone
here,
he's
like
a
convenience
store
of
industrial
parks
right
on
that
on
that
corner.
AB
But
yes,
we've
as
it
is
where
we
stand
here,
we
didn't
just
come
up
with
this.
You
know
two
weeks
ago
or
a
month
ago,
it's
been
in
the
running,
for
you
know
three
four
months
and
originally
again,
this
road
wasn't
going
up
north
and
to
abide
by
in
that
Tech
Stop
meeting
TxDOT
doesn't
want
a
lot
of
punch
outs
in
this
area.
Right,
we
are
just
you
know
of
just
a
fraction.
It's
us.
Needmore
has
just
a
little
bit
more,
probably
less
than
us,
and
then
it's
the
bridge
system
right.
N
N
AB
Q
AB
North
Laredo
development
is
in
yellow
and
need
more
has
access
off
of
Mines,
okay
and
they
come
all
the
way
to
the
river
kind
of
come
down.
Come
in
here
go
around
the
City
of
Laredo
wastewater
treatment
plant
come
here
and
they
have
this
little
exit
so
in
in
the
talks
with
TxDOT
that
happen
roughly
30
days
ago,
where
it
was
representatives
from
all
of
us
and
I.
AB
Remember:
Rafa
was
there
now
I
can't
believe
I
forgot
that
Rafa
was
there,
so
we
showed
them
that
this
street
is
going
to
be
the
other
street
that
probably
parallels
Mines
Road.
This
road
is
going
to
extend
North.
That's
that's.
The
point
here
is
so
that
all
this
doesn't
just
go
and
there's
different
routes
to
get
to
the
bridge,
both
in
and
out
not
not
just
going
to
the
bridge.
There's
also
issues
going
out.
So
if
there's
ever
an
emergency,
you
can
kind
of
go
out
and
go
north.
AB
So
so
our
road
is
there
for
the
future,
which
wasn't
there
in
the
original
submittal.
Now
it
is,
and
then
with
that
being
said,
you
know
this
landowner's
responsible
also
to
build
part
of
this
road,
so
in
the
TxDOT
meeting
that
we
had,
it
was
proposed
that
need
more,
would
tie
into
our
road
only
up
to
here
and
and
use
our
road
as
the
connection
and
then
when
these
guys
come
tying
in
the
north,
they
tie
in
the
wrist,
because
that's
obviously
that's
how
every
landowner
works
here.
AB
You
know
we'll
the
right-of-way
is
going
to
be
there.
It's
going
to
be
dedicated
if
for
some
reason,
something
happens,
but
yes
in
that
Tech
Stop
meeting
that
coordination
was
okay,
we'll
we'll
tie
into
your
road
we'll
build
this
road
here
to
tie
into
your
road
so
that
everybody
here
doesn't
try
to
squeeze
out
here.
They
come
out,
use
your
road
and
come
and
use
our
road
and
come
down
down
the
middle.
So
we
have
been
in
coordination.
AB
There
has
been
like
Rafa
said
you
know,
there's
nothing
set
in
stone
here,
but
and
and
more
than
likely
it's
all
going
to
be
based
off
of
development
right,
but
the
intent
has
been
spoken
about.
It
has
been
put
on
the
table
to
where
all
right,
I'll
come
in
and
tie
in
here
and
I'll
build
this
road
to
tie
in
to
let
out
my
like
I,
don't
remember
how
much
they
have.
They
probably
have
another
140
150
acres
here
and
then
the
future,
the
big
landowners
north
of
us
they're
they're.
AB
AC
AB
AB
And
then
go
we
take
a
ride
to
go
into
the
bridge
same
thing:
if
we're
coming
down
Camino
Colombia,
they
just
take
her
right
into
our
Park.
Take
a
right,
but
to
get
out,
we
come
and
take
the
turnaround
and
go
this
way.
Now
these
two
lots,
which
are
the
two
bigger
Lots.
That's
the
majority
about
half
of
the
of
the
subdivision.
They
do
have
axis
off
of
off
of
Mines
Road.
That
can
have
that
as
an
independent
driveway.
This
bigger
lot.
We
have
made
it
a
a
wider
Frontage.
AB
The
reason
for
that
wider
Frontage
is,
after
a
certain
size
of
Warehouse.
You
do
need
two
ins
and
outs,
but
not
only
that
those
two
ins
and
outs
have
to
be
separated
by
half
the
diagonal
of
the
lot.
So
that's
why
you
need
to
have
such
a
so
much
Frontage
on
a
public
road
which
we've
taken
care
of
that.
E
E
I,
don't
think
that
makes
sense
with
the
volumes
that
we
have
right
now.
Turning
right
and
thinking
I
mean
it
I,
don't
think
that's
going
to
work
if
you're
going
to
do
it
for
1500
Acres,
you
know
I
know
it
works
today
and
they're
going
to
put
one
warehouse
and
that's
it'll
be
perfect.
You
know,
but
what
is
the
bigger
picture?
I
would
think
that,
just
like
we
have
at
our
world
trade
Bridge
we
closed
the
the
ramp,
that's
closest
to
the
to
the
bridge.
W
E
It's
a
little
complicated
to
read,
I!
Think,
but
overall,
our
intent
is
to
kind
of
keep
in
mind
the
big
big
picture,
but
if
the,
if
the
count,
if
the
commission
feels
that
number
one
there's
no
need
for
that
and
number
five
takes
care
of
the
problem,
because
yes,
once
again
text
that
takes
care
of
it.
Well,.
H
H
F
H
X
AB
Question
so
yes,
it's
it
and
just
the
way
development
is
kind
of
spewed
out
in
our
ordinances
and
just
the
way
things
go.
We'd
have
to
get
an
approval
by
this
commission
before
we
even
proceed
to
go.
Ask
for
something
else.
If
the
I
can
go,
get
an
approval
from
TxDOT
and
the
commission
says:
I,
don't
like
it,
it
negates
my
approval
from
TxDOT.
So,
even
though
TxDOT
is
the
one
that
approves
it's,
so
it's
so
much
easier
to
go
and
get
the
the
plaque,
because
the
plant
encompasses
so
many
more
different
issues.
AB
Water
sewer,
all
that.
So
we
have
to
get
the
plat
approved
here.
First,
not
only
just
Ingress
egress,
but
is
there
enough
capacity
for
sewer
enough
capacity
for
water
and
then
from
that
point,
if
we're
okay,
we
start
initial
assessment
and
we
do
submit
a
tech
stock
permit
or
we
would
like
to
submit
a
textile
permit
even
before
final.
However,
the
time
frames
that
TxDOT
has
in
the
city
has
are
night
and
day.
AB
If
we
get
the
approval
from
TxDOT,
we
have
six
months
to
build
it.
So
sometimes
it
takes
four
to
five
months
to
get
out
a
One-Stop
shop.
So
if
we
go
get
it,
it
negates
our
approval
so
that
those
are
the
things
that
we
have
to
deal
with
with.
So
we
have
to
go
at
it
strategically,
in
this
case,
on
a
bigger
subdivision
like
this.
AB
If
it
were
just
one
lot,
I
don't
have
any
improvements:
I
can
go,
get
the
the
driveway
permit
and
within
six
months
I
can
build
it,
but
right
now,
TxDOT
might
take
more
than
that.
Plus
I
only
have
six
months
to
build
it
so
here,
so
that
there's
not
a
lot
of
impact
both
time,
wise
and
financial
wise
on
the
developers.
This
is
probably
the
easiest
way
to
go.
Come
here,
get
the
plan
approved.
Now,
let
me
go
get
it
now.
AB
They'll
just
it'll,
just
expire
on
us,
so
now
they've
been
giving
letters
hey
based
off
of
this
layout
when
you
come
for
this
driveway,
if
it
doesn't
move
from
here,
you're
almost
guaranteed
a
driveway,
so
we've
done
that
on
on
on
other
projects
again,
that
process
still
takes
a
long
time,
but
yes,
I
mean
we're
we're
already
starting
our
coordination,
we're
already
starting
our
Tia
work,
traffic
impact
analysis
and
it's
a
double-edged
sword
like
like
the
director
said.
You
know
you
have
a
lot
of
traffic
I'll
put
a
cul-de-sac
here.
AB
That'd,
be
you
know
that
way
to
eliminate,
but
then
that
that
second
edge
of
the
sword
is
well
now
other
people
can't
access.
So
it's
kind
of
like
what?
What
do
we
want
here
and
we're
all
for
I
think
on
our
prelim.
If
this
gets
tabled
or
denied,
we
still
have
our
original
preliminary
plot
that
we,
you
know
that
has
the
the
same
thing
here
here.
It's
just
making
these
lots
a
little
bit
bigger
for
the
end
user.
AB
A
AB
AB
E
Can
easily
nowadays
we
easily
have
zoom
meetings,
WebEx
meetings,
whatever
you
know,
we
get
texts
out
on
the
line.
The
engineer
is
on
the
line,
so
it
it's
just
the
like
I
said
we're
just
trying
to
coordinate
all
this
acreage
and
but
again,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
txdot's.
The
final
call
so
Mr
Guzman
over
at
TxDOT.
We
can
always
check
with
him
to
see.
If
he's
dealt
with
the
engineers
I
mean
there's
ways
we
can
do
it
so
there.
AB
Was
a
subsequent
meeting
you
know
I
think
we
met
30
45
days
ago
there
was
a
subsequent
meeting
that
was
scheduled
that
was
canceled
by
TxDOT.
All
Scott
had
more
of
a
conversation
with
Mr
Guzman
at
txtot,
but
I
think
at
that
point
he
felt
okay,
I
think
we
have
enough
information
to
where
we
know
what's
going
on
here.
In
all
fairness
to
not
only
us
but
City
staff
as
well.
AB
These
are
the
ends
of
the
city
limits.
Here
we
don't
even
have
thoroughfare
plans
here.
You
know
we
don't
have
this
so
This
coordination
is
important
by
all
means.
It
is
important.
It's
just
up
to
a
certain
point.
You
know
we
just
kind
of.
We
don't
want
to
rely
on
somebody
else
right.
We
obviously
we
always
have
to
rely
on
the
city
and
TxDOT,
but
on
Neighbors
I,
like
Oscar
a
lot
personal
friend
of
mine,
but
he
can't
hold
me
back
that
much.
A
AB
AB
That
out
and
that's
just
a
different
animal
that
that
that's
probably
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
coordination
or
the
textile.
It's
it's
people
that
are
not
here,
right
and
they're
going
to
take
this
note
and
they're
going
to
be
like
well
what
happened,
and
now
opinions
start
coming
in
on
something
that
we've
already
spoken
about
either
here
or
at
TxDOT,
so
that
that's
the
only
thing
the
rest
of
the
comment
can
stay.
N
AA
F
A
N
A
We
have
a
second
by
commissioner
guys,
all
in
favor
aye
aye
against
motion
carries
moving
on
to
item
8B,
preliminary
reconsideration,
the
Plaid
of
skg
Columbia
Industrial
Park
north
and
the
granting
of
a
variance
to
increase
the
500
foot
threshold
for
a
dead
end
Street
for
the
proposed
Street
Sierra
Madre,
the
intent
is
industrial.
The
purpose
of
this
reconsideration
is
to
reconfigure
lots
and
remove
a
street.
C
AA
And
also
we're
asking
for
a
variance
you
know.
Usually
the
the
dead
ends
called
the
sack
that
it
has
a
maximum
of
500
per
a
little
Land
Development
code
in
this
case
and
and
I
think,
in
my
opinion,
that's
more
for
for
a
residential
user
Network.
In
this
case
it's
a
it's
industrial.
So
we're
not
asking
for
a
lot
more
we're
asking
for
200
feet
more
and
and
it's
a
I
think
it'll
also
provide
a
little
more
space
before
connecting
to
to
a
255
and
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions.
A
D
A
C
A
AB
I,
don't
know
why
I
went
before
Oscar
and
I'm
like
so.
There
has
been
some
developments
since
the
agenda
came
out.
I
do
have
a
letter
from
Emerald
Emerald
Riverview
that
staff
got
forwarded
to
staff.
It's
basically
saying
that
we
can
move
forward
with
the
with
the
plat
Provident
is
under
contract
for
it
and
in
the
contract
documents
it
allows
for
certain
things
to
happen.
Hey
go
ahead
and
get
preliminary
Platt
to
see.
You
know
where
everything
happens.
AB
AB
E
AB
AB
It's
not
the
floodplain
issue,
it's
the
Wetland
issue,
but
just
possible
on
September
1st.
There
was
new
guidelines
to
determine
what
actually
is
a
wetland
since
then,
and
my
legal
jargon-
please
Danny,
don't
you
know
stab
me
on
this
I
think
there's
like
a
temporary
injunction
on
the
new
rules
right
that
go
into
effect
either
by
the
states
that
happen.
So
the
rules
don't
go
into
effect,
September
1st.
AB
They
still
have
to
be
heard
at
you
know,
in
our
judicial
system
and
once
those
get
released,
then
the
new
jurisdictional
rules
come
out
which
we
would
be
able
to
develop
this
area,
but
because
it
is
right
now
we're
taking
it
out
and
then
once
the
new
ruling
comes
in,
that
doesn't
become
Wetlands.
We
add
it
back.
So,
okay.
AB
N
AB
It
gives
it
so
the
applicant
is
Provident
right,
but
the
owner
of
the
property.
What
what
staff
wanted
is
is
make
sure
that
the
owner
of
the
property
is
okay
for
us
to
come,
no
and
and
yeah.
That
knows
that
we're
we're
coming
in
preliminary,
so
in
in
an
effort
to
appease
them.
We
have
a
letter
from
the
owner
allowing
us
to
proceed.
N
N
A
J
N
A
A
N
N
P
C
We
now
read
those
items
record
for
the
record
final
consideration
of
the
plot
of
North
Laredo
Industrial
Park
phase,
five
approved
final
consideration
of
the
plot
of
Lot
4
block
2
Alexander
commercial
subdivision
phase,
15
approved
vital
consideration
of
the
replay
of
Lot
29
D5,
acre
subdivision
into
lot
29a
and
lot
29b
D5
acre
subdivision
approved.
This
is
one
step.
Thank.
A
Now,
going
on
to
the
reconsideration
of
the
following
final
plots
and
final
replays
item,
10A
can
I
have
a
final
reconsideration
of
the
Plaid
of
Northwest
Industrial
Park
phase.
Three
part
B.
The
attention
is
industrial.
The
purpose
of
this
reconsideration
to
modify
a
platin
note
can
I
have
motion
action
on
this
item.