►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 030719
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 030719
A
A
C
A
Moved
to
excuse,
yes,
what
they'll
mean
is
he's
the
one
that
asked
sold
okay
motion
in
a
second
elusive
paper.
I
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Can
everybody
please
stand
for
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
A
C
A
A
Request
review
consideration
of
the
master
plan
is
something
in
a
subdivision
date.
10
is
residential
and
commercial.
This
is
219
acres,
219
point
four
acres:
it's
located
south
of
El,
Camino,
Boulevard
and
west
of
us
highway
83.
This
is
a
961
lot
development
and
his
own
daegeum
b1.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
planning
from
topic:
safety
from
parks
and
leisure.
A
D
D
A
A
F
Dance
chairman
commissioners,
Wayne
Nance,
porous
borders.
That's
engineering,
we're
here,
do
it.
We
went
through
all
these
comments.
We
agree
with
them,
except
for
item
number,
seven,
which
corresponds
also
to
traffic
item
number
two,
and
also
the
new
traffic
item
number
four
that
you
spoke
of
utilities
new
comment.
We
have
no
problems
with
that
as
part
of
the
planning
process,
the
widening
of
weird
odd
to
eighty
feet.
It
is
very
problematic
for
us
and
I'd
like
to
go
over.
Why
you
have
a
moment
to
here's
out.
F
As
you
know,
you
in
2017
can
I
have
this
overhead.
Yes,
all
right!
2017
the
city
passed
a
comprehensive
plan
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
You
outline
your
collectors,
your
arterioles,
and
all
that
all
the
expectations
that
you
had
this
updates
that
that
long-range
thoroughfare
plan
that
used
to
be
over
there.
If
you
look
at
the
so
this
is
a
very,
very
new
plan
that
the
traffic
department
reviewed
the
city
reviewed,
and
this
is
what
they
approved,
and
this
is
what
they
go
by
whenever
you
zoom
in
to
this
area.
F
Okay,
we
use
this
to
design
when
you
go
into
our
area.
Our
subdivision,
there's
right
here
in
the
yellow,
okay,
we're
acknowledging
you
see
this
blue,
this
blue
collector,
that's
sticking
out
in
the
end
we
have
put
an
80-foot
collector
in
the
master
plan
is
still
there.
What
they're
asking
for
is
an
extension
of
this
red
line
that
terminates
at
83,
okay,
they're
asking
for
that
to
also
be
upgraded
as
a
collector.
It
is
not
in
the
master
plan.
F
This
is
a
2017
master
plan,
we're
following
the
city
rules,
so
this
is
an
in
our
opinion
and
unnecessary.
Upgrade.
There's
also
you'll
see
a
little
bit
of
wisdom
in
this.
If
you
think,
like
text
on
text,
doesn't
want
lights
every
hundred
feet,
neither
do
we,
you
can
see,
there's
a
there's,
some
wisdom
in
this,
spacing
that
you
see
throughout
the
city
and
how
far
they
want
them
apart.
They
don't
want
too
many
large
streets
so,
and
this
can
even
be
seen
under
II
flee
here.
F
If
you
want
to
see
what
this
looks
like
with
an
aerial,
we
already
have
I'll
talk
about
this
in
a
minute,
an
upgraded
street
in
our
opinion
here
recognizing
the
collector
that
the
comprehensive
plan
shows
and
alma
mater
they're
asking
for
an
extra
one
here,
it's
not
there.
It's
not
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
I,
don't
think
that
their
city
there's
no
reason.
It
was
recently
reviewed.
F
However,
with
that
said,
or
if
you
look
at
our
master
plan,
all
we
would
really
have
to
put
there
is
a
local
street,
but
we
do
recognize
that
this
is
a
crossover
point.
We
recognize
that
this
is
a
crossover
point,
so
we
propose-
and
what's
on
there,
instead
of
a
50-foot
local
street,
we
have
already
a
60
foot
street.
That's
going
to
have
over
a
40
foot
street
a
wider
Street
already
planned
in
that
area.
F
No
frontage,
ok,
so
there's
not
house
is
gonna,
be
fronting
this,
so
you're
gonna
have
good
traffic
circulation
already
a
safety
thing
taken
care
of
also
a
40
foot
street
okay,
if
they
want
to
add
that
center
lane
for
continuous
left
turn
lanes
to
make
it
even
safer.
That's
always
an
option
in
a
40
foot
street
because
you
can
get
two
lanes
and
then
a
center
turn
lane
and
we
have
volunteered
at
this
intersection.
F
You
know
this
paint
street,
it's
just
unnecessary
and-
and
we
just
don't
agree
with
it,
and
we
hope
that
you
feel
the
same
way.
The
the
brand
new
that
that
takes
care
of
it
was
planning.
Item
number
seven
and
traffic
item
number
two,
the
last
one,
the
brand
new
one
that
traffic
brought
up.
They
want
a
third
north/south
collector
at
this
point.
Okay,
that's
three
bridges:
I
mean
they're
they're,
just
not
recognizing
expense
at
all
and
by
this
time
we're
so
close
to
the
river.
F
We
don't
see
any
benefit
in
that,
because
people
are
going
to
generally
head
in
the
north
and
east
direction
to
get
to
83
I
mean,
what's
that
going
to
do
accommodate
this
very
limited
amount
of
people
on
this
side
and
the
expense
of
a
bridge
I
mean
this
is
a
major
out
fault
here.
So
we're
talking
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
to
just
put
up
a
bridge,
that's
just
whimsically
assigned
as
something
that
you
know
that
would
make
the
world
a
better
place.
F
So
we
just
don't
agree
with
that
one,
and
so
we
think
that
these
two
bridges
that
we
already
have
provide
ample
north-south
connectivity.
We've
put
a
lot
of
thought
into
this
I
mean
months
and
months
of
thought
into
this,
so
we
want
it
to
be
safe.
We
agree
with
all
the
other
comments,
but
we
we
think
that
this
is
a
amply
safe,
local
Street,
local,
collector
style
Street,
and
we
feel
that
these
two
are
adequate.
F
A
A
E
D
F
F
Is
this
one
right
here,
yeah
yeah,
oh
I
I
would
have
to
measure
it,
but
it's
obviously
half
the
distance
of
of
these
two.
So
probably
just
over
a
thousand
feet,
I
mean
that's
just
that
hundred.
F
A
F
F
A
F
E
E
F
E
G
Better
to
have
more
connections
in
case
there's
an
accident
or
in
case
there's
a
street
that
is
closed,
it's
better
to
have
more
connections
that
done
only
one
I
understand
that
the
reason
they
don't
want
to
do.
It
is
because
there
is
a
channel
and
I
think
that's
the
reason,
but
for
us
it's
like
we
prefer
to
have
more
connections
like
me
personally,
a
lot
of
times
have
to
travel.
G
G
Your
bridge
and
then
80
foot
right
away,
whereas
we
were
not.
We
know
that
that's
gonna
be
one
of
the
main
streets
and
we
anticipate
that
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
of
traffic
going
in
this
street
and
I.
Believe
that's
one
of
the
also
phase
one
right
most
most
people
are
gonna
be
using
that
Street.
First
then,
the
other
one
has
that
eighty
foot
right
away,
I.
B
Want
follow-up
question
so
I
hear
that
you
say
that
it's
better
to
have
more
connections,
but
apart
from
that
I
guess
there
a
specific
formula
to
the
population
that
your
suggestion
that
it's
that
it's
needed
other
than
it's
better
I,
get
that
it's
better.
But
but
what
formula
did
you
are
y'all
using
that
one.
H
B
G
B
B
F
G
B
D
B
F
A
point
I
think
what
you're
trying
to
say
is:
there's
a
point
of
diminishing
returns
as
you
get
to
the
rio
grande,
and
we've
made
that
argument
before
I
mean
you
don't
take
a
huge
road
and
tons
of
connectivity
to
the
dead
end
of
the
United
States.
You
want
to
increase
your
connectivity
as
you
go
out
this
way
and
another
point
I
want
to
make.
As
far
as
connectivity,
we
have
two
points
of
connectivity
to
existing
subdivisions
up
here
in
the
north,
we'll
be
adding
a
third
one
here.
F
So
this
is
not
the
only
way
out
regarding
the
bridge,
though
yes
adding
the
bridge
here.
My
argument
see
now
he
is,
is
that
the
general
flow
of
traffic
is
this
way,
so
more
people
are
going
to
be,
as
you
go
east
you're
going
to
get
higher
traffic
here,
we're
serving
a
very
limited
round
of
people
here,
as
you
start
to
move
over
this
way,
these
people
are
going
to
be
using
the
Eastern
bridges,
so
we're
putting
a
very
expensive
structure
to
serve
a
very
people,
and
that's
why
we
disagree
with
this
anyway.
F
A
D
E
F
Are
two
points
of
interconnection
of
connections
in
the
college
type
subdivision?
Oh
okay.
So,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
the
majority
of
people
we
believe
in
phase
one
are
gonna,
actually
go
out
there
to
go
hit
that
light
uncle
Nino,
yeah
Dex,
that's
not
gonna
have
a
light
at
eighty
three
until
whenever
they
determine
that
it's
necessary.
We
think
that
if
I
lived
in
this
neighborhood
I'm
going
up
to
Don
Camilo
I'm
gonna
go
find
that
they've
left
yeah
we'll
find
an
intersection.
You
know
not
not.
You
know
not
chance
it
across
eighty-three.
F
G
C
D
A
Right,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
that
we
have
is
reviewing
and
reconsideration
los
pacientes
east
master
plan,
the
antennas,
residential
and
commercial.
The
purpose
of
this
revision
is
to
reconfigure
phases
and
realign
streets.
This
is
a
hundred
and
seventy
acre
tract
is
located
west
of
Concord,
Hills
development
and
east
of
cuatro
Vientos
Road,
185
block
development,
and
it's
owned.
A
g
r1
r1
a
and
before
riposte
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
planning
and
traffic
safety
parks
and
leisure.
D
D
C
A
A
Ocean
the
second
holes
in
favor,
aye
aye
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Next
item
is
reviewing
consideration
of
antler
Crossing
subdivision
master
plan
antennas,
residential
and
commercial
is
one
hundred
twenty
four
point.
Two
nine
acres
is
located
north
east
of
I-35
and
south
of
he
sees
it
all
sunny,
Seattle,
Parkway
469
lakh
development
is
owned
before
the
post
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
Planning
from
traffic
safety
parks
of
leisure.
Ui
HD
has
a
comment
on
their
on
on
some
connectivity
and
a
notice
to
developer
mr.
B
A
A
Motion
we
have
a
second
second,
second,
all
those
in
favor
all
right.
All
those
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
a
preliminary
consideration
of
the
replay
blocks:
121
and
122
block
3,
San,
Ysidro
and
they're
crossing
subdivision
and
to
unplanted
tracks
of
point,
11
acres
and
1.12
acres
out
of
vacated,
Piazza
and
sold
fourteen
point
three
for
acre
tract
on
to
San
Ysidro
Southwest
and
are
crossing
subdivision
face
to
the
antennas
residential.
This
is
a
nineteen
point.
Three
six
acre
tract.
A
D
A
D
A
H
E
Ladies,
this
is
that
same
area
that
we
spoke
about
last
time
that
had
the
sewer
issue
correct.
So
that's
that's
to
be
figured
out
later
on,
but
we're
all
aware
that
there's
a
concern
but
there's
not
a
solution
yet.
D
E
H
Correct
we
know
there's
an
issue
right
now.
I
know
we
do
have
we're
going
to
be
able
to
hopefully
develop
phase
one
we
have.
We
have
permission
to
do
that.
We
know
there's
an
issue
for
this
area,
but
we
also
know
that
the
city
is
already
working
on
on
a
solution.
We
actually
met
with
utilities
we
discussed
I
know
they
want
some
assistance
from
from
us
from
the
from
the
engineers
and
we're
just
hoping
to
get
this
past
this
step.
H
E
A
A
Alright.
The
next
item
that
we
have
is
the
luminary
consideration:
a
utility
trainer
plant,
the
antennas
industrial.
This
is
a
ten
point.
Five
one
acre
tract
is
located
at
the
north
of
Muller
Memorial
Boulevard
and
in
west
of
1472.
It's
a
1
lakh
development
at
7
1.
The
track
is
located
in
district
7.
The
most
active
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
Planning
from
engineering
from
Water
Utilities.
D
D
A
A
A
C
A
Second,
all
those
in
favor
aye
all
right
motion
carries
okay
item.
10,
a
consideration
to
the
name.
Change
did
the
replant
of
a
amended
plat
of
lot
one
block
once
any
seeded
o
Southwest
face
to
into
sunny
see
little
southwest
enter
crossing
phase
one
in
10
days,
residential
and
commercial.
The
proposed
action
is
approve
substance.
The
following
comments
from
planning
some
got:
emotions.