►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 020322
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 020322
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
All
right,
the
next
item
we
have
is
the
approval
of
the
minutes
of
february
the
6th
and
january
the
20th.
I
move.
We
approve
the
minutes.
We
have
a
motion.
Do
we
have
a
second
second
and
a
second
all
those
in
favor,
aye
aye?
All
right
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Does
anybody
anybody
sign
up
for
citizens?
Comments?
A
B
B
E
A
F
A
A
G
A
H
I
guess
on
on
this
this
little
map
here
I
have,
we
could
probably
explain
a
little
bit
all
right
there
you
go
there.
It
is
so
what
you
see-
they're
kind
of
shaded
in
this
gray
area
on
this
map
is
basically
the
extension
of
unit
royal
and
carrier's
drive
and
so
we're
planning
the
seven
lots.
It's
about
160
acres
in
size,
pretty
massive
size
lots.
Each
lot
is
averaging.
You
know,
over
about
30
acres
in
size.
To
these
warehouses
will
be
us
pretty
good-sized
warehouses.
H
The
projection
of
that
road
is
to
ultimately
connect
to
the
loop
of
the
ruthinger
interchange,
which
is
current,
which
is
already
in
design
by
txdot
and
and
that's
basically
part
of
our
overall
master
plan
to
continue
this.
This
roadway
to
the
north
to
help
alleviate
some
of
that
traffic
congestion.
So
this.
G
H
H
There
will
be
a
lifetime
tenant,
and
so
their
goal
is
to
develop
one
plat
one
phase.
At
a
time
phase
one
was
planted
about
five
years
ago
yeah,
so
we
don't
expect
to
be
cladding
or
coming
before
you
every
year
every
other
year.
It's
basically
gonna,
be
obviously
market-based,
but
if
any
indication
is
where
we
are
today,
you
know
it
may
be
another
four
or
five
years
from
now
before
we
come
see
you
again
for
another
phase.
H
However
there's
you
know
we're
already
in
talks
and
trying
to
help
in
develop
solutions
for
traffic
congestion,
as
we
all
know
about
we're
constantly
talking
with
txdot,
where
they
are
and
monitoring
their
progress
on
their
designs
and
and
working
with
the
develop
the
landowners
to
the
north.
Okay,
let.
H
Yeah
I
apologize
for
not
bringing
a
master
plan.
I
didn't
I
didn't,
but
if
you
have,
let's
see
in
that
particular
map
on
the
screen
now
yeah,
let
me
let
me
see
I
can
work
with
this
one
so
in
our
plat
we're
extending
unit
royal
and
carriers
and
the
the
actual
road
that
we're
that
we're
bringing
in
is
is
a
port
grande
boulevard.
It's
a
it's
a.
H
But
the
the
idea
here
is
to
continue
the
extension
of
of
of
port
grande
boulevard
and
here
so
here
at
sofia,
there's
a
strip
of
land
that
that
is
owned
by
majestic
and
they
purchased
that
independently
when
they
acquired
this
property
because
they
knew
back
then
that
there
was
going
to
be
a
need
for
this
type
of
road
extensions
and
so
their
property
line
terminates
at
what's
known
as
doctor's
road.
Okay,
I.
H
Where
their
property
line
currently
terminates
so
they're
there,
they
plan
to
extend
that
up
to
doctor's
road
and
we're
working
with
the
landowners
now
to
the
north.
To
start,
we've
already
been
working
on
this
for
planning
purposes,
to
extend
this
road
continuously
to
the
north
and
then
ultimately,
tied
to
some
type
of
it'll,
be
like
a
loop
road,
not
the
outer
loop,
but
a
loop
road
that
will
connect
to
the
ruthinger
interchange,
okay,
to
take
the
truck
traffic
to
the
north
and
to
ruthinger
and.
A
G
G
A
Thank
you
yes,
sir.
Any
other
questions
for
the
engineer
from
anybody
all
right.
If
not,
what
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission
I'll
move
to
for
motion
and
a
second
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye,
those
against
motion
carriers?
Thank
you.
Next
time,
final
consideration
of
the
plan
obviously
subdivision
unit
six,
the
intense
commercial.
A
A
B
A
All
right
any
questions
from
the
commission:
if
not,
what
are
the
wishes?
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
promotion?
We
have
a
second
second.
Second,
all
those
in
favor
all
right
motion
carries
next
item.
Final
consideration
of
salicydo
southwest
detention
on
platinum
intent
is
for
detention
pawn.
Well,
I
think
what
you
need
to
put
on
here
is
more
like
the
intent
is
for
drainage
of
x
number
of
acres
to
be
held.
D
K
Good
afternoon,
mr
chairman,
members
of
the
commission,
ramon
chavez
city
engineer
to
address
the
question.
The
developers
are
responsible
to
maintain
these
bonds
for
a
minimum
of
two
years
after
that
they
have
an
option
to
pretty
much
dedicated
to
the
city.
In
this
case
I
know
that
the
council
member
for
district
six
is
interested
in
in
this
land
to
further
recreate
it
and
to
flag
football
fields.
So
that's
something
that's
being
discussed
with
the
developer
as
we
speak,
but
nevertheless
they
will
be
responsible
to
maintain
it
for
two
years.
G
G
G
A
Go
ahead,
you
have
another
question.
No,
I
don't
thank
you.
Nobody
else.
Thank
you.
Come
on
all
right
motion,
I'm
going
to
approve
a
second
and
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye,
aye
aye.
Those
are
gains.
Motion.
Carries
next
item.
Is
consideration
model
subdivisions
rule
the
plight
of
green
subdivision
phase,
10b
lieutenant's
residential.
B
C
Worse,
so
my
understanding
talking
to
it
is
that
when
we
put
this
on
the
on
our
website,
we
compress
it
and
when
we
compress
it
to
put
it,
we
lose,
we
lose
its
blurriness.
So
we
called
the
the
software
company
to
see
if
they
can
provide
us
with
more
capacity
or
to
to
so
that
we
could
have
more
room
in
order
to
leave
it
as
it
is,
and
and
not
have
to
compress
that
way.
But
that's
what
I'm
hearing
from
my
team,
the
compression
is
where
we
lose
the
quality.
A
L
C
J
G
I
Our
requirements
is
that
sorry,
so
some
of
the
requirements
at
the
water
development
board,
the
matter
saying-
is
placed
on
both
the
city
and
the
county.
Is
that
in
having
gotten
the
grants
for
the
water
and
sewer
for
the
colonials,
they
had
to
adopt
the
model
rules.
So
in
the
model
rules
there
is
additional
certification,
where
the
city
is
certifying
for
30
years,
that
it
will
have
the
capacity
for
the
subdivisions
for
the
on
the
residential
side.
So
that's
how
we
bring
them
just
to
the
commission
as
a
blessing
and
also
notifying
the
public.
I
D
D
F
M
M
Well,
we
assess
what
capacity
we
have
available
and
that
determines
whether
we
can
approve
the
subdivision
or
not.
When
I,
when
that
30-year
letter
comes
to
me,
I
have
to
have
that
available
capacity.
So,
as
each
subdivision
comes
in
I
assess
do
we
have
the
capacity
to
serve
that
development
for
the
next
30
years.
So
as
when.
G
You're
assessing
the
line,
the
sewer
line
on
1472
and
all
the
development
that
goes
through
there.
I
remember
the
initial
line
was
a
force
main
that
used
to
come
in
right
and
there
was
always
an
issue
either
at
lowe's
or
dr
ike's,
because
the
line
came
all
the
way
down.
Does
it
still
have
that
or
did
you
increase
the
capacity
or.
M
We
make
modifications
reroute
some
of
those
force
veins
and
lift
stations
to
provide
capacity
in
the
line
we've
been
doing
maintenance
in
situ
lining
of
some
of
these
lines
to
allow
for
more
capacity
redevelopment
has
occurred
in
some
of
these
areas.
Some
of
these
homes
are
not
connected
or
there's
no
flow
so
that
we
update
that
information
on
an
annual
basis
to
identify
what
capacity
we
have.
What
reserve
we
do
have
and
that's
how
we
assess
the
service
areas
and
say
along
the
mines,
road
or
whatever
service
area
that
I'm
so.
G
M
G
M
In
fact,
eventually
sakata
creek,
we
want
to
decommission
and
take
all
that
flow
down
to
the
south
plant,
which
has
more
capacity
and
it's
construction
of
it.
What
we
call
our
tunnel
project
so
that
we
get
this
large
trunk
line
that
will
carry
all
that
capacity
flow
to
the
southwest
water.
Hopefully,.
A
B
A
B
D
A
B
F
D
A
A
G
E
C
L
A
K
Right,
honorable,
chairman
members
and
commissioner
ramon
chavo
city
engineer,
so
in
2017
there
was
an
amendment
to
the
ordinance
where
developers
were
allowed
to
drain
to
the
back
and
to
the
neighbors.
Before
that
all
development
and
all
lots
had
to
drain
to
the
front
in
2017
we
were
against
it.
We
did
not.
We
were
not
recommending
for
it
to
proceed,
but
the
council
decided
to
move
forward.
We
tried
from
the
staffs
and
to
try
to
put
as
much
information
as
we
could
to
make.
K
The
engineer
provide
all
that
information
that
you're
referring
to
including
details
for
the
block
fences,
including
all
those
calculations,
as
of
related
to
the
runoff
and
and
we
created
some
special
drainage
easements
under
that
ordinance
as
well,
where
those
were
going
to
be
private,
and
so
in
some
of
these
cases,
homeowners
are
responsible
to
maintain
those
special
drain
achievements,
because
we
were
just
not
going
to
be
going
into
private
property
and
provide
this
maintenance.
So
so
that's
what
happened
in
2017,
pretty
much.
K
And
that's
where
we
included
all
these
fha
details
where
that
was
already
there,
and
that
was
just
information
that
we
wanted
to
utilize
again
just
to
provide
as
much
as
we
could
on
the
plan
so
that
at
least
a
homeowner
or
that
when
they
went
to
get
a
building,
permit
they're
able
to
at
least
understand
what
they
could
do
or
not.
Because
you
know
that
sometimes
when
builders
come
in
they'll,
just
recreate
the
lots
and
then
you'll
create
a
different
issue.
Exactly.
A
A
K
A
G
Problem
is
that
that
buying
a
house
is
like
buying
a
car,
it's
nice,
it's
shiny
whatever,
and
we're
having
these
technical
issues
where
we're
discussing
the
floods.
Whatever
I
can
guarantee
you
even
I'm
guilty
of
buying
a
house
and
not
realizing
that.
There's
a
flood
deal
in
the
back,
and
so
people
don't
look
at
it
and
you're
expecting
the
people
to
be
knowledgeable
buyers
that
they're
going
to
be
aware
of
these.
K
A
F
A
You
know
what
is
a
good
design,
because
I've
seen
a
lot
of
lots
that
it's
it's
really
bad
for
the
homeowner.
You
know
yeah,
you
got
your
pet
side
and
you
bit
the
house,
but
you
look
at
the
backyard.
It
goes
up.
You
know
maybe
a
couple
of
feet
three
feet,
or
vice
versa,
drops
in
the
front
we
may
want
to
revisit
and
look
at
this
whole
design
issue
of.
How
do
you
grade
properties
to
give
the
homeowners
99
of
the
homeowners.
F
A
Not
going
to
know,
what's
there
I
mean
you
can
read
everything
you
want
to,
but
when
you're
closing
have
you
ever
done,
closings
1001
forms
come
for
you
to
sign.
You
don't
know
what
you're
signing
you're
just
signing
and
you're
not
going
to
pay
attention
that
hey
until
it's
until
you
get
the
problem
there,
you
go
well
what
the
heck!
That's
right!
That's
when
you
get
the
issue
and
that's
when
you
get
it
okay,
so
what
I'm
saying
is
we
need
to
figure
out
a
way
to
work
through
all
this
stuff?
A
Development
or
anything
can
have
a
nice
piece
of
property
that
they
bought
and
that
it
works
for
everybody
I
mean,
I
guess
some
of
the
better
examples
you
can
have
is
probably
the
older
phases
of
the
community
where
most
of
your
language
flattens
as
we
grow
out.
Obviously
we
have
to
deal
with.
You
know
different.
A
Creeks
and
everything
else,
but
I
think
there's
some
things
that
we
need
to
really
look
at
again.
I
know
we're
supposed
to
try
to
figure
out
what
we're
going
to
do
with
the
land
development
codes.
We
may
want
to
revisit
some
of
those
issues,
because
I
think
it's
only
fair.
I
mean
given
given
the
price
of
what's
going
on
with
housing
right
now
and
then
to
get
stuck
with.
Oh,
my
god,
you
got
a
drainage
problem
now
or
a
drainage
issue.
I
think
we
need
to
really
revisit
that
and
yeah.
A
A
So
what
are
you
going
to
do
block
it?
And
that's
what's
going
to
happen
because
I
had
to
deal
with
a
lot
of
those
they
blocked
it
and
then
the
other
guy
calls
in
and
says
hey.
This
is
illegal.
How
are
we
going
to
enforce
this
and
it's
just
a
mess,
and
also
more
so
with
reduced
setbacks.
Now
yeah,
we
have
reduced
setbacks
now,
which
makes
it
even
a
tougher
issue
on
rear
drainage.
A
D
A
C
A
J
Mr
truman,
just
a
quick
note.
I
remember
this
coming
before
the
planning
department
and
then
city
council-
and
this
was
pushed
by
the
tech,
the
technical
review
committee.
So
it
would
probably
be
a
good
idea
to
revisit
with
them
because
they
had
all
this
research
and
things
that
they
provided
in
order
to
get
this
approved.
A
A
Know
every
city
is
an
individual
city.
I
don't
think
we
can.
You
know,
cut
and
paste
from
different
cities,
but
it's
something
that
we
need
to.
Maybe
ask
the
planning
director
city
engineer
and
maybe
we'll
take
a
look
at
these
things,
not
only
so
much
the
drainage
but
maybe
also
the
the
way
the
properties
are,
are
developed
and
shaped
and
stuff
all
right.
So
what
are
the
wishes?
A
M
Sorry,
yes,
sir
chairman
commissioners,
since
you
raised
the
issue
about
those
walls
and
how
water
gets
impounded
in
these
lots,
one
situation
and
utilities
that
I'm
dealing
with
in
our
sanitary
source
system
is
some
of
these
homes
that
are
compounding
this
water.
They
typically
open
up
our
clean
outs
and
drain
their
rainwater
into
our
sewer
that
overloads
our
system.
M
F
D
M
A
A
B
Mr
chairman,
for
the
record
applicant
is
wwe
engineering
engineer.
I'm
sorry
is
it
fellow
consulting
property?
It's
approximately
7.97
acre
check
of
land
located
north
of
bethlehem,
1472
and
east
of
people's
boulevard.
The
zoning
for
the
67
la
development
is
r1p
and
the
proposed
use
is
residential
and
it's
asking
for
an
extension.
A
A
D
G
C
Dealing
with
txdot,
yes,
they
have
to.
They
have
to
provide
traffic
impact
analysis
before
they
can
even
do
it,
because
they're
they're
exiting
onto
a
text.highway
and
it's
managed
by
text..
So
as
long
as
text.
can
the
numbers
follow
the
guidelines
of
txdot?
They
can
do
a
development
to
come
out
onto
that
property.
C
C
G
G
N
For
fire
well,
like
you
mentioned,
if
there's
a
proposed
second
exit
coming,
then
the
fire
department
accepted
it
there's
an
exception
in
the
fire
code.
That
shows,
if
it's
proposed-
and
it's
shown
that
it's
coming,
then
we
we
have
there's
an
exception
that
we
accepted,
because
if
we
didn't
it
would
halt
pretty
much
all
development.
N
That
area-
and
you
do
have
that
at
your
discretion
I
mean,
if
they're,
coming
up
just
because
everybody
else
here
said
it's
okay,
I
mean,
if
you
feel
it's
gotten
to
the
point
where
that
secondary
means
entrance
and
exit
is
taking
too
long,
I
mean
it
can
be
held
up
still
yeah,
but
on
on
our
code
when
they
come
to
us
it's
meeting
code
because
of
that
exception,
so
we
have
to
give
it
to
them.
Okay,.
A
A
I
think
I'm
gonna
make
this
point
to
the
planning
department
director.
Okay,
the
engineer
that
needs
to
address
this
commission
needs
to
be
knowledgeable
of
what
they're
talking
about,
because
we
have
questions
that
don't
seem
to
have
answers
and
it
becomes
very
critical
to
this
commission
and
what
we're
going
to
be
approving.
We
may
not
approve
now.
If
we
can't
get
the
right
answers,
I
mean
a
lot
of
these
questions
are
very
very
pertinent
questions
that
seem
like
hey.