►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 022020 Part 2 of 3
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 022020 Part 2 of 3
A
To
be
something
in
good
faith
that
we're
gonna
sacrifice,
I
need
to
get
paid,
what
I'm,
what
I
can
sell
it
for
and
that
sacrifice
myself
but
I.
Think,
more
importantly,
can
this
right
away
be
redesigned?
I
mean
I,
still
question
that
if
the,
if
the
areas,
if
they
have
when
we
have
a
meeting
at
the
Joel's
office,
it
seemed
like
that
they
did
work.
They've
got
a
huge
right
away.
You
try
to
work.
All
the
people
move
the
ropes
a
little
bit
in
there.
They
don't
have
to
have
someone.
A
A
Well
so
our
point
and
our
crossbows
is
today
we
never
slaver.
What
is
that's
gonna
work
today,
but
what
can
we
make
with
us
today?
They're
asking
us
to
leave
it
out,
have
to
say
nothing
for
it,
because
what's
it
sound
of
the
subdivision
is
worth
nothing
to
them
and
you
just
I'm
just
quoting
it
and
then
that's
the
first
time
I
hear
so
I
said
well:
I'm
I'm
gonna,
leave
it
out.
I
leave
it
in
my
subdivision
right.
C
F
And
I
want
to
specify
that
our
detectors
project
it
not
to
kill
the
development
like
I
mentioned
earlier,
we're
trying
to
promote
economic
development.
I
think
I
mentioned
the
last
meeting.
That
redesign
would
I
think
in
the
total
sum
I
think
they
would
lose
ten
or
twelve
actual
houses.
So
he
was
talking
about
five
hundred
houses
when
I
are
bidding
for
your
night
husband
but
you're
not
kidding
they've,
tired
of
it
of
it.
I
just
want
to
make
that
to
the
tech
side
is
by
no
means
right.
Wanting.
C
To
do
it
but
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
is:
is
there
a
way
for
the
developer
to
sort
of
unofficially
designate
some
land,
but
it's
still
within
the
subdivision,
so
that
it
has
the
value
of
the
improvements
that
you've
done
on
the
land,
but
but
so
that
at
the
later
point
should
they
proceed?
You
can
get
the
value
of
that,
but
still
be
able
to
construct
now
you're
still
going
to
that
one
way
to.
G
G
I
J
I
Of
all,
that's
still
negatively
affects
us
as
I
have
to
move
the
road
I
move.
The
road
I
use
this
row
of
Lots,
so
that's
still
negatively
affects
us,
but
then
how
does
affect
the
Lots
on
a
170?
Nobody's?
Gonna
want
to
buy
a
170
by
45
at
the
rate
that
they're
selling
each
one,
because
they
know
that
they're
gonna
have
to
sell
it
in
the
future,
so
now
you're
creating
a
bigger
lot
and
almost
selling
it
for
the
same
price
as
the
smaller,
not
because
in
the
future
it's
gonna
be
given
away.
So.
C
C
Heck
here's
my
message
in
the
video
is
there
any
way
that
we
can
modify
your
comment
here
to
accommodate
what
they
want
to
do,
but
also
accommodate
with
a
mean.
Is
there
a
way
to
modify
this?
This
comment
is
there
anything?
Is
there
a
compromise
that
as
us
as
the
commission
can
do
in
terms
of
what
we
approve.
G
G
J
G
B
G
B
But
the
person,
but
the
Lots
not
gonna,
be
happy
about
that.
They're
gonna
buy
your
lot.
You
got
a
plan
and
I,
don't
think
that's
I,
don't
think.
That's
the
angle
at
all.
I
think
they
want
to
be
satisfied
that
they're
gonna
be
offered
a
fair
market
value
based
on
at
least
something
similar
to
a
residential
lot.
Without
there
being
scrubland,
that's
been
cast
often
with
a
wall.
You
see
so
al
qaeda's
texts
not
handle
them,
because
if
they're,
if
this
is
a
partnership,
this
is
a
real
partnership
in
which
what
we.
H
B
Them
to
and
must
to
be
supportive.
We
can't
set
them
up
to
be
low-balled
in
18
months,
where
they
now
put
their
master
plan,
and
then
you
say:
well,
here's
this
sliver,
that's
worthless,
so
we're
gonna
pay
you
I'm,
not
I'm
executive
worthless,
but
well.
How
is
that
compromise
reached
when
you
can
say
well?
Is
it
to
the
commissioners?
What
are
they
call
the
Highway
Commission
of
the
truck
finish:
division,
Transportation,
Commission?
B
Okay,
when
we
say
the
way
these
people
were
their
partners
with
us
and
they
redesigned
their
lots
to
catch,
to
cut
this
piece
out,
and
so
we
need
to
give
them
a
reasonable
bit.
Is
nothing
I'm.
Gonna
say
this:
it
doesn't
need
to
be
full
retail,
obviously,
but
it
can't
be
cast
away,
cast
off
land
and.
D
F
D
D
H
J
H
I
H
C
C
Them
to
settle,
but
we
have
no
reason
to
tie
them
there
in
their
project.
Because
of
this
comment,
that's
between
them
and
texts
are
not
between
us
as
a
as
the
Commission.
Our
policy
mandate
is
to
develop
our
city
and
to
and
to
create
economic
development
for
city
and
I.
Think
that
we
should
approve
this
striking.
That
comment.
That's
what
I,
what
I
have
my
suggestion
is
at
this
point:
okay,.
L
J
E
B
Yes,
it's
been
a
long
thing,
but
what
is
the?
What
is
the
financial
ramifications
of
this
more
or
less?
Well,
just
anybody.
What's
the
dollar
muscle
we're
talking
about?
What's
the
difference
routine,
then
proceeding
and
and
prepare
to
if
they've
set
it
aside,
and
what
we're
talking
about
dollar
wise,
because
that's
what
was
floated
out
to
us
was
that
this
this
commission
isn't
gonna,
is
going
to
look
unfavorably
on
these
red
flags,
the
bitumen
sons
brought
up
or
what
about
the
red
flags
about
decisions
that
are
made
that
hinder
reasonable
progress
and
taxpayer
money?
J
C
I
don't
feel
like
I.
Don't
know
that
is
the
commissioners
advertise
the
department
reputation
took
that
position,
they
would
be
wrong,
I
mean
we
have
deliberated
over
it.
I
mean
this
is
a
very
difficult
issue,
but
I
just
think
it's
outside
of
an
hour
or
whatever
their
debate
is
about.
Pricing
is
not
our
issue,
you
know
it's.
No,
it's
not
I
should
I
would
not
agree.
M
M
M
M
J
M
M
M
Got
the
right
tool
to
to
come
before
us
anything
can
happen.
Approve
it.
You
see,
but
also
takes,
are
saying
duck
would
get
in
this.
We're
gonna
pay
for
it
it's
about
a
year
and
a
half.
This
is
not
about
being
friends.
This
is
not
about
knowing
range.
This
is
not
about
knowing
this
around
the
corner,
easy.
So.
M
M
J
M
You
a
bad
guy,
but
I
truly
think
that
you
can
work
and
leave
that
piece
of
land
which
is
we
need
1
point
something
April
the
cargo.
You
know
that
it
can
be
done
so
so,
if
we're
gonna
put
on
a
position
that
will
have
to
take
either
side
see
how
we'll
have
steak
myself,
that's
the
enemy
coming
all
right,
very
good
tonight.
L
It
up
mr.
wheen
and
I
suppose:
that's
it
I
think.
We've
we've
got
a
motion
on
the
floor
and
now
that
they
we
just
need
to
move
all
this
I
usually
have
a
second
on
this.
You
were
gonna,
go
ahead
and
restate
your
sorry,
okay,
all
right,
so
the
bushes
on
the
floor
there
now
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
there
just
a
minute.
Let
me
take
out.
B
M
B
A
E
B
L
L
N
J
D
E
A
G
J
E
E
E
P
L
Q
F
F
F
B
P
So
what
I'm
requesting
at
this
point,
we're
not
even
sure
to
seek
funds,
will
cover
so
I
think
all
of
that
can
be
wrapped
into
the
area
living
between
the
city
and
the
county.
So
I'd
like
to
comment
the
comment
rates
put
the
line
in
the
ground,
so
we'd
like
them
in
that
comment,
basically
say
whatever
society.
P
P
P
B
P
P
B
P
P
B
We
see
other
developments,
no
one
talks
to
so
much
what
our
made
it.
You
know
we're
doing
some
stuff
not
here
to
US
president
this
extension
and
it's
been
done
in
phases
and
it's
complete
with
bike
paths
and
I'm.
Not
sure
if
this
is
this,
is
this:
isn't
gonna
be
residential
neighborhoods
on
either
side
of
these
two
streets
over
here,
at
least,
it's.
B
P
B
P
J
L
L
Funds
to
make
an
improvement
to
whether
it's
city
or
county,
it's
still
in
the
area
and
I-
think
that's
the
big
picture
we
need
to
look
at.
We
need
to
look
at
the
big
picture.
We've
got
plenty,
a
double
destructive
porn,
a
roll
of
the
drain.
I
bet
it's
gonna
have
some
turning
light
somewhere.
Yeah
I
think
that's
the
key
here
as
opposed
to
what
your
alternative
is
right.
Now,
it's
a
dirt
road
penny
to
Road.
L
J
C
H
P
J
B
L
Three
is
the
comment
that
she's
referring
to
improvement.
Subject:
interlocal
agreements
between
suitor
in
Webb
County
the
fire
comment
is
requires
they're
attending
that's
accommodate
yeah
requires
it
better.
There's
no
more
line,
but
you
can
do
is
add
one
more
comment
from
the
various
movies
and
obviously
that
that
has
to
be
hashed
out
between
the
city,
because
the
city
is
the
one
that
has
utilities
and
so.
M
L
J
E
P
M
P
B
G
So
we
last
time
smoke
about
how
we
were
working
on
amending
the
ordinance
for
townhomes
and
spent
too
much
time
today,
because
this
is
not
I.
Don't
want
you
to
take
action
today
on
this.
Ask
that
you
take
this
and
especially
given
that
we
have
to
address
this
recommendation
and
I
also
given
each
of
y'all
a
copy
of
the
ordinance
as
it's
currently
written
or
proposed
for
talent.
Now.
G
Why
are
we
addressing
this
I
want
to
talk
about
the
current
ordinance
for
town
homes
and
talk
about
why
work
has
something
amended
and
they
talk
about
its
time
very
possibly
for
amending
the
town
at
one
point
or
affecting
our
town,
or
so
definitely
with
the
existing
ordinance.
There
are
multiple
definitions
for
town
houses
and,
and
so
it's.
A
G
E
G
J
G
What
happens
if
somebody
wants
to
do
a
town
house
watch
it's
pink
attached,
single-family
homes,
what
kind
of
homes
that
Cheryl
all
they
want
to
do
that
to
have
to
come
in
and
it's
a
negotiation
with
the
Planning,
Commission
and
sometimes
y'all
are
caught
off
guard
because
you're
not
sure
what
you
say:
24
width,
they
say
20.
What
does
it
really
matter?
What
so
we
want
to
give
some
clear
guidance?
Somebody
comes
from
10
ounces.
They
know
what
what
that
development
standards
are
and
then.
G
They
bring
to
the
plan
efficient
and
that
just
let
me
do
planning
recommendation
not
for
final
approval.
So
then
they
have
to
go
to
Council.
It's
a
risk
whether
or
not
they
get
it.
They
might
have
to
go
all
the
way
back
and
and
redesign
the
project,
because
there
weren't
clear
guidelines
upfront
so.
G
G
Bring
this
up
again,
another
time
this
is
our
permitted
use
table.
So
if
you
wanted
to
do
townhouses
currently,
there
are
multiple
categories:
there's
single-family,
town,
nuts
and
then
there's
townhouse
on
the
bottom.
You
can
see
each
of
these
have
different
zones
that
they're
a
group
that
lack
of
clarity
is
very
confusing
for
developer,
would
come
in
and
want
to
do
these
projects.
What
we're
proposing
is
to
eliminate
this
second
category
and
in
the
first
category
I
make
this
single-family
term
is
the
ways
to
find
art
and.
G
M
L
Say
we
should
allow
before
that's,
certainly
something
all
because
if
you
look
at
our
new
comp
plan,
we
are
now
looking
at
multi
uses.
Okay,
we're
now
looking
at
creating
these
different
type
of
environments,
which
is
a
mixture
of
business
and
helps
most
of
your
B
fours
are
now
strictly
to
be
used
for
business.
But
if
we
can
allow
particular
town
columns
in
there
to
Portugal
that
land
could
be
developed,
is.
Q
J
L
G
H
G
Conflicts
with
the
uses
that
would
be
in
a
be
more
like
person
sabar
next
to
townhomes,
but
we
are
working
on
a
mixed-use
development
and
a
degree
that
would
allow
for
maybe
actual
vertical
mixed-use,
which
would
mean
okay.
You
know
residential
on
the
above
and
business
I.
Think
then
that
would
cover,
but
that's
certainly
open
for
discussion.
You
want
to
take
the
recommendations
which
do
counseling
something
different
now.
Another
table
we
have
in
our
ordinance
is
the
dimensional
standards.
J
G
G
J
G
J
G
M
G
That
we
want,
we
thought
a
lot
about
was
yes,
there
are
reasons
why
we
are
PUD.
Ordinance
are
planning
unit,
Belvin
orbs,
where
you
could
do
townhomes
doesn't
get
utilized.
One
reason
is
the
size
restriction.
How
big
is
townhomes
will
be
a
good
product
for
infill,
but
often
the
infield
is
just
a
couple
Lots
and
although
you
could
fit
three
or
four
townhomes
in
there
and
that
would
make
it
viable
for
developer,
buy
those
lots
of
development.
G
You
can't
do
a
single
family
town,
single-family
development,
to
make
it
work
and
townhomes
would
be
permitted
because
you
need
large
acre.
So
what
we
could
be
proposing
is
to
allow
for
infill
development
where
you
already
have
a
public
street,
and
you
already
have
public
utilities
running
down
the
street
and
you
just
have
a
couple
vacant
lots
and
if
the
zoning
permits
you
could
fit
townhomes
in
there.
Otherwise,
if
you
don't
have
that
situation,
you
just
have
Robin
belt
land,
we're
asking
a
minimum
of
two
acres
and
31
townhouse
Lots.
J
B
B
G
H
G
E
G
G
You
could
go
down
to
five
feet
when
you
meet
certain
conditions.
One
of
those
conditions
would
be
so
problems
with
decrease
in
the
setbacks.
When
you
decrease
the
setbacks,
you
create
a
lot
of
conflict
as
you're
swishing
everything
in
a
small
area,
but
if
you
can
move
some
of
those
things
that
are
complex
out
and
put
them
in
common
areas
like
garbage
collection,.
A
G
You
if
you
click
garbage,
not
every
single
address,
but
you
have
a
common
garbage
to
traffic
in
like
some
of
our
well-designed
townhouse
developments.
Do
then
you
don't
need
that
space
on
every
in
front
of
every
house
and
if
you
move
the
utility
meters
from
every
single
individual
house
to
up
a
multimeter
which
is
actually
much
better
for
the
city
and
for
the
developers
cheap.
The
Builder
is
better
for
the
city
too,
because
we
don't
have
to
check
every
two
region.
We
would
go
check
the
master
meter.
J
J
G
They
meet
some
conditions
now,
one
condition
where
they
won't
be
able
to
go
and
fight.
Pete
is,
let's
say
they
want
to
put
this
development
into
a
neighborhood.
That's
already
existing
well,
well,
the
way
we've
written
it
is
that
they'll
have
to
adhere
to
the
average
setback.
That's
already
in
the
neighborhood,
so.
L
G
O
G
J
G
J
G
P
G
G
E
G
G
We
don't
want
these
to
just
look
like
boxes,
so
there's
some
requirements
for
it
to
be
articulated
and
to
use
higher
quality
materials.
Those
will
be
ultimately
the
discretion
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
instead
of
just
coming
up
and
bringing
a
list
of
oh
hey,
this
is
what
I
want
to
do
in
a
really
rough
schematic.
You'll
have
to
bring
the
Planning
Commission
a.
H
G
But
you
can't
build
what's
cheapest,
you
also
have
to
build
something
that
fits
in
the
neighbors,
but
you
do
get
smaller
lights
as
well,
there's
a
compromise
and
then,
finally,
finally,
we
need
a
homeowners
association
as
a
requirement,
because
without
the
essential
idea
of
a
townhouse
is
that
you're
gonna
have
common
property
you're
sharing
a
common
wall,
they're
sharing
a
common
roof.
You
might
have
a
common
utility
meter
going
through
if
you
just
build
it
and
you
don't
have
a
strong
provision
for
in
20
years.
G
G
G
G
It
actually
I've
been
a
part
of
a
process
in
multiple
cities
with
site
plan.
It
is
very
common
out
there
in
other
cities
and
it
works
well,
there's
a
reason,
it's
common
because
it
works
well.
So,
finally,
that's
what
I
have
is
going
depth
I
want
to
go
in
depth
on
another
time
when
we
have
more
time,
yes
and
what
they
don't
want
to
do
is
reach
out
to
developers
as
well
I'm
going
to
ask
with
these
SUVs
that
are
brought
before
you.
G
G
Things
that
we've
already
staffs
that
that's
not
going
to
work
but
they're,
saying
no
we're
just
we're
just
gonna,
go
to
plan
commission
and
export
and
do
this
negotiation
that
they've
done
before
the
best
you
piece
it
is
against
our
own
rules
to
do
it
that
way,
we're
not
supposed
to
be
improving
lot
widths
that
are
below
our
minimum
and
yet
we're
using
a
soupy
process.
You
know
when
our
ordinance
clearly
states
we
can
so.
G
G
H
C
G
H
G
J
G
G
G
J
K
J
G
Going
to
meet
with
other
developers,
including
this
one,
these
that
are
here
today
and
so
I
just
asked
you
to
have
those
SUV.
If
you
don't,
then
then
the
second
option
is,
you
can
approve
the
SUV,
leaving
the
conditions
here
that
we've
brought
before
you
I
brought
provisions
that
are
very
well
thought
through
and
they're
there
in
front
of
you
and
we
can
work
with
developers
to
redesign.
H
G
A
G
G
K
The
time
I
think
a
I
see
and
I
can't
disagree
with
anything.
The
fact
that
we
need
that
at
the
same
time
you'll
be
completing
fear
and
and
I,
don't
like
this
kind
of
follow
us
at
there.
But
we
just
we
went
last
year.
We
met
with
the
entire
with
the
staff
of
the
planning
zoning
representative
from
the
different
departments
we
address
the
calls
from
except
for
the
24,
which
is
Lisa
requirement,
nice
things
out
of
context,
but
we
have
traced
operatically.
L
Let
me
ask
you
a
question:
what
reversible,
what
we're
talking
about
here
and
Alec
you're
talking
I,
think
specifically
about
your
project
right,
we're
really
just
talking
about
the
ordinance
that
he
is
presenting
and-
and
we
want
your
comments
on
that
we're
gonna
get
to
your
project:
okay,
not
there
yet
I.
Where
we're
talking
about
this
draft
ordinance
that
is
being
proposed.
I.
K
G
L
M
B
I
B
We're
given
credit
on
the
newspaper
sit
at
a
rate
of
text
on
each
other
and
we
invited
another
single
member
of
our
out
there,
and
it
was
occurred
to
me
that
it
was
a
little
bit
of
a
chickeny
move
on
my
part.
Happily,
but
technically
it's
correct
that
I
shouldn't
vote
on
that
since
I.
Don't
forget
taxpayer
dollars
to
do
this
job
boy
over
here
to
create
the
text
bigger
dollars
being
spent.
B
C
N
N
N
N
N
The
future
land
use
designation
for
that,
which
is
the
Skype
recommendation,
we're
supporting
this.
This
is
compatible
with
the
current
uses
and
also
this
property.
It's
been
already
recommended
for
approval
from
the
Commission
for
the
annexation,
examination
of
one
which
is
our
own
deployment
process,
and
it
was
recommended
approval
with
emissions,
which
is
like.
D
N
N
J
J
L
J
N
H
F
C
N
Stop
recommendation
stuff:
this
has
never
been
in
support
because
it
doesn't
mean
that
this
is
your
apartment.
Nothing
has
changed.
Is
this
a
real
patient
at
the
same
residential
district
is
at
the
same
distance,
so
we,
the
property,
does
not
mean
parking
environments.
Also,
they
used
to
have
an
agreement
with
the
one
of
the
property
owners
next
door.
They
don't
have
that
agreement
anymore,
so
they're
like
parking
spaces,
so
we're
not
so
can
support
its.
L
N
Q
K
L
R
Muchas
gracias,
Larry
sahaja
yoga.
Well
so
we
have
developed.
Emergencies.
Are
internal
commands,
este
and
Nellie
uniteq
to
me
so
next
Dora
para
como
la
if
I
come
up
for
Philippine
okay
guilty
mr.
die
pero
como
de
poco,
más
despacio
mementos,
oh
yeah
man,
you
know
I
said
no,
no
solos
dosa
a
split
immense
Alejandrina,
parousia
home
alarm,
us
see.
Suppose
a
basilica
mother
mass
is
pastures.
With
you
a
hand
is
the
most
honest
of
cuando
la
partying,
so
you
cancel
momentum.
Los
los
restaurantes
y
el
problema
que
quiera
mumbai
de
vecinos.
R
Almost
a
cyst
on
CTN,
fond
of
music
they're,
most
acerra
only
reappraise
comida
bonito
mexicana
familia
de
OCHA
la
mañana
I
was
in
it
evokes
a
Sierra.
We
are
a
most
a
Elizabeth.
What
are
some
others
that
are
much?
He
ii
get
the
commune
stickers
and
contests,
as
you
know,
so.
True,
no
intent
thumbs
and
in
Beaumont
hotel,
impose
Fontainebleau.
Lo
hace
la
nena
Cantina
in
los
Kamali's
porcini
asado,
a
solar
to
see
Noga
si
por
que
por
la
mañana.
Look
at
Moses
Aaron
we're
so
poor,
lotta
green
Darla,
sallow,
bonito,
Camus
steakhouse.
J
R
J
R
J
I
R
L
R
L
H
J
J
L
E
D
C
L
H
N
C
N
N
L
L
B
C
N
J
N
M
B
L
G
L
G
C
L
J
S
C
C
J
P
C
K
K
C
The
master
is
coming
so
I
guess
conceptually
you're
saying
how
many
of
which
this
was
the
the
the
what's
the
distance
between
the
minutes,
22
22
right,
no
pool
between
them
together,
which
the
lava
sir
20
right
and
in
an
earlier
comment
you
had
said
you
know
he
could
even
maybe
do
in
18
right,
but
but
assuming
heads
of
the
things
right.
So
I
guess.
My
question
to
you
is.
C
G
It's
the
same
this
year
that
we're
seeing
with
other
projects-
and
that
is
when
you
have
a
street
where
you
have
the
garbage
cans
out.
You
have
meters
utility
meters
that
are
placed
where
the
driveway
is
they're,
not
able
to
pick
up
the
automatic
interface.
But
you
know
we
have
the
system
that
we
we
measure
in
Radian
measure.
J
G
Parked
on
top
of
those
right,
I'm
going
to
take
measurements,
the
meters
of
the
water
meters,
utility
meters,
there's
issues
with
the
amount
of
parking
that's
provided,
because
it's
in
garages
we're
not
providing
and
I'm
actually
writing
out
a
part.
This
was
going
to
be
parking
on
the
street.
That's
Miss
Philippines
and
weight
limits.
So
all
the
design
issues
we've
seen
st.
potential
is
there
with
these.
A
H
K
K
Paid
time
it
does
need
the
coordination
that
it
still
don't
and
now
you
know
I
am,
and
it
hasn't
been
a
you
know,
I'm
I'm
sure
this
is
not
many
can
tell
me,
you
know
like
their
say
on
these
particular
ones
is
happening
and
what
I
think
that's
something
about
this
initiative
or
design
just
to
make
sure
we
coordinate
very
well
well
what
they
were.
The
meters.
K
K
K
C
C
G
Clarify
just
a
couple
things,
one
home
beginnings,
that
we
told
them
where
our
position
was
on
this
grass-
nice
warm,
they
say
the
risk.
So
we
didn't
surprise
him
of
this
thing.
We
said
we
would
be
arguing
for
24
widths
and
they
didn't
choose
to
redesign
at
that
point
now.
The
challenge
for
them
is.
We
asked.
G
You
know
time
when
we're
trying
to
change
it,
to
make
it
better,
so
they
can
go
smaller
and
let
certain
provisions,
if
you
want
to
move
forward,
you
can
stick
with
those
22
to
22
foot,
wins
that
they
design
muchos,
asking
the
special
use,
especially
use
conditions
that
there
be
a
new
respect,
some
of
the
ones
we've
put
in
place
like
the
making
sure
people
can't
park
on
the
street
and
making
sure
the
utilities
are
located
in
a
way.
That's
not!
Oh,
we've
got
Nesta
quickly.
L
L
That's
because
the
problem-
okay,
but
you
getting
back
to
the
whole
issue.
He
is
coming
in
prior
to
us,
changing
the
origins,
okay,
so
yeah.
He
said
that
unfortunately,
threesome
he's
before
we
have
to.
We
have
to
treat
this
case
based
strictly
on,
what's
in
place
right
now,
there's
a
Google
or
dismissal
and
that's
what
we
have
the
t
organism,
yay
or
nay,
based
on
his
request,
based
on.
L
C
L
The
way
that
the
way
utilities
usually
does
this
is
they
do
it?
Why
coming
off
of
each
meter,
so
you're
gonna
have
one
here
one
here,
his
issues,
gonna
be
other
design.
Are
you
gonna
do
mirror
images
or
what
kind
of
a
designer
you
gonna
use
a
mirror
image
than
there
is
no
problem.
Okay,
your
meters
are
cleared,
it's
not
a
problem.
It's
a
design
issue.
L
You
know,
that's
the
sending
out
it's
a
simple
one:
to
take
care
of
yeah,
okay,
okay,
I
make
I
make
motion
they're
still
above
it
carry,
and
let
me
just
finish
simply
carry
are
you
through
with
your
presentation?
Yes,
your
comics!
Thank
you.
Alright,
this
is
a
public
there.
Anybody
else
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
in
paper.
L
K
L
L
E
L
C
L
J
L
G
J
B
K
A
C
L
L
Q
L
B
K
O
N
L
F
E
O
Take
my
tea
guys,
what
can
I
may
I
speak?
Yes,
you
know
you
guys
are
arguing
over
part
of
the
width
of
the
lots
and
I
went
ahead
and
ran
what
different
can
towns
around
the
radio
Dallas
in
Estonia,
but
their
minimum
width
SAR,
and
you
can
see
that
they
go
down
a
lot
smaller
than
22
feet.
You
can
see.
O
B
B
Real
question
I
had
and
I
wasn't
asking
for
the
earlier
one
that
I
did
since
you're
standing
I
can
ask
you
is
why
not
just
comply
or
why
not?
Why
not
move
to
something
that
the
Planning
Department
would
say
you
know
what
new
you're
gonna
use
smaller
is
fine,
but
you'll
then
allowed
these
space-saving
features
at
kiss
me
and.
O
Actually,
to
22
new
we've
done
these
projects.
Five
different
times
in
hilltop
I've
got
to
face
have
been
three
three
times
in
escondido
subdivision
twenty
two
feet
work.
It
makes
the
density
work
force.
It
makes
the
price
point
so
folks
that
make
about
50
to
60
thousand
dollars
can't
afford
the
homes
two.
O
O
As
a
cost
factor
and
I
actually
have
photos
where
we've
done
it
before
and
I
think
the
comment
was
at
the
trash.
Didn't
work
right
or
something
like
that.
You
can
get
in
there
and
we've
actually
pulled
it
done
until
talking
before
and
actually
haven't
dumped
in
the
garbage
Kansas
more
than
that
I
can.
B
B
E
B
B
L
H
L
L
O
Right,
you
can
see
them
for
the
photo
there
that
trash
to
the
the
recycling
bins
in
the
street
and
that's
that
curve
off
there
and
there's
there's
plenty
of
cars
too
much
it.
Okay.
No!
This
is
better
I
killed.
Leslie,
oh
I've
got
it
well,
that's
actually
he'll
focus
on
one
side
of
Michigan.
Well,
this
is
the
brand
new
and
we
were
into
yeah.
That's
what
we're
building.
J
O
D
O
You
can
see
it's
plenty,
it's
the
woods
there.
People
aren't
parked
in
the
street
right
and
the
exact.
This
is
just
for
the
these
creatures
service.
The
residence
is
only
it's
not
a
have
to
traffic
right.
It's
not
you're,
not
going.
That's,
not
the
Springfield
you're
cutting
through
debris.
There's
no
sir!
You.
B
O
This
is
to
get
a
price
point
in
here,
we're
looking
for
150
thousand
the
160.
If
the
people
can
afford
our
dissing
is
not
much
different
than
what
the
r1
beats.
Okay,
okay,
maybe
a
little
bit
more
perfect,
read
a
little
bit,
but
I
have
a
traffic
city
to
we've
done
it.
We
don't
see.
Traffic
has
been
a
problem
in
here,
yet,
especially
when
you
guys
officially
get
the
HR.
Have
a
policy
holder
traffic
study
all
about
thirteen
to.