►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 062019
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 062019
A
C
A
Thank
you.
I
do
know
that
I
had
two
commissioners,
so
the
makers
have
a
doctor's
appointment
and
I.
Think
mr.
O'reilly
is
out
of
town.
That's
correct.
Can
we
have
a
motion?
Mr.
Diaz
is
also.
Can
we
have
motion
to
excuse
him?
Please
you
have
motion
in
the
second
and
the
second.
All
those
in
favor
hi
motion
carries.
Thank
you
very
much.
Did
everybody
please
stand
for
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
A
A
B
Much
my
name
is
Kirby
snide,
Minh
I'm
from
Southeast
Texas,
originally
from
the
Houston
area.
Town
called
humble,
but
I've
lived
in
several
states
and
I
have
a
master's
degree
and
planning
worked
as
a
consultant
for
many
years,
worked
in
over
a
hundred
cities
in
the
United
States
and
then
as
a
city
planner,
most
previously
coming
from
a
city
in
Utah,
where
I
worked
with
Commission
and
Council
and
yeah
I
had
a
great
experience.
I
came
to
Laredo
because
I
think
it's
a
wonderful
place.
Now
everybody
keeps
telling
me
it's
hot
here.
B
Well,
I
want
y'all
to
come
visit
found
these
Texas
because
it's
hotter
believe
it
or
not.
That
humidity
doesn't
hold
at
night,
but
really
what
I
I've
been
here
before
as
a
young
man
visited
in
the
90s
and
then
came
back
in
2015
when
I
was
a
consultant
working
on
the
downtown
terrorist
project,
and
it
was
interesting
to
see
what
had
happened
from
the
90s
to
here
to
2015
the
decline
that
the
downtown
saw
in
activity.
I
mean
there
were
challenges
with
the
downtown
then,
but
a
lot
busier.
B
You
may
not
realize
it
because
they're
so
busy,
we
we
need
more
staff.
We
need
to
get
them
the
ability
to
get
out
and
get
involved
with
the
public,
but
I
think
they
are
very
skilled
and
we're
gonna
put
that
to
the
test,
because
we're
gonna
be
working
more
with
the
public
and
I'll
be
getting
out
getting
to
know
the
residents
and
taking
the
plan
Viva
Laredo
from
a
plan
to
implementation.
Doing
that
we
still
need
more
input.
We
still
need
more
involvement
and
we're
gonna.
B
A
You
we
welcome
you
very
much.
You
look
very.
We
look
forward
as
a
commission
to
working
with
you
and
hoping
that
working
together
I
mean
we
can
get
a
positive
done
in
this
community.
Thank
you
all
right.
First
item,
then
we
have
is
a
public
hearing,
many
the
zoning
ordinance,
the
city
lawyer
by
Riesz
only
left
20
block
five,
so
I'm
talking
to
subdivision
determine
before.
A
A
I'm
sorry,
it
was
a
mini
the
zone
in
order
to
the
simulator,
by
reasons
only
about
20
block
5.
So
I'm
talking
to
subdivision
unit
614
located
at
104,
Frank
Jadhav
a
drive
for
marwon,
a
single-family
reduced
area,
the
r1m
H
single-family
manufactured
housing
district,
the
proposed
use
at
residential,
the
current
site
is
currently
vacant
and
the
staff
supports
there's
a
zone
change.
A
F
A
G
A
Motion
do
we
have
a
second
second
and
a
second
all
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
that
we
have
is
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
only
ordinance
map
for
the
city
Reuter
by
reasons
only
a
lot
18
block
5,
so
I'm
happy
to
subdivision.
This
is
unit
14
located
108
Frank,
shut
up
and
drive
tomorrow
won
a
Darwin
purposes
again.
Residential
and
the
staff
supports
the
proposed
zone
change.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
in
favor.
A
C
I
C
G
A
Motion
do
we
have
a
second
second
and
second,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you
next
item
that
we
have
is
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
city
of
Laredo
by
rezoning
lot,
1
to
7
&,
8
block
1605
Eastern
Division,
it's
located
at
2701
north
street,
from
an
art
to
multi-family
residential
district
and
our
old
residential
office
district.
A
A
A
A
J
A
G
K
A
A
A
A
K
C
A
question
yes
mister
just
so
I
can
get
educated
on
this.
It
was
it
was.
It
obviously
was
an
active
all
at
one
point
and
so
you're
required
to
get
especially
is
permit
to
plug
it.
Correct
does
that
include
any
soil
testing
and
things
like
that
when
you,
when
you
remove
like
when
you
remove
gas
tanks
and
things
out
of
the
ground,.
K
You
know
to
be
honest
with
you:
I'm
not
familiar
with
the
Commission
regulations,
whether
the
requires
all
testing
at
this
point,
I,
don't
believe
they
do
if
they're
having
a
spill
or
some
other.
You
know
cause
for
concern
and
think
that
that
would
be
the
case.
But
at
this
point
I,
don't
think
there's
any
requirement
and
I
don't
think
the
lease
calls
for
it
either.
K
A
A
G
A
K
Thank
you.
It's
a
little
compatible
again
on
behalf
of
Columbus
energy
commissioners.
This
is
our
third
special
news
application
and,
except
for
today-
and
we
would
like
to
plug
this
well
and
remove
our
infrastructure
basically
vacate
this.
This
is
the
surface
lot
and
allow
for
other
development.
So
we
ask
that
you
support
our
application.
Okay,.
J
Good
evening
my
name
is
Chris
Haynes
I'm
here
representing
the
owners
of
the
property
and
based
on
the
fact
that
this
well
has
been
inactive
for
well
over
a
decade,
there's
been
exchanging
hands
from
one
energy
company
to
another,
and
these
guys
are
ready
to
plug
it.
We
are
definitely
in
favor
of
that.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Mr.
Haynes.
A
C
C
A
L
L
M
C
H
I
O
O
A
A
N
For
the
rittle
welcome
up
these
and
I
recited,
it
lets
a
chi-blocker
seducing
and
I'm
against
or
post
or
one
day
me
simply
because
when
we
lot
the
property
back
in
the
70s,
it
was
promised
to
us
that
all
of
the
sections
around
our
neighborhood
that'll
be
our
lunch
and
I.
Don't
think
it's
fair
to
now
how
later
on
change
everything
others!
M
The
density
is
gonna,
be
higher,
the
population
is
growing
as
it
is.
We
have
a
lot
of
people
in
the
breaking
multiples,
make
subdivide
in
their
property
making
apartments
if
they
should
see
places
where
in
carports,
renting
their
houses
for
other
people.
We
don't
have
those
many
people
original
people
up
in
45
years,
their
winters
people
are
living
because
of
that
she
promised
an
art.
A
knot
are
a
big
one:
okay,
so
I'm
against
it,
especially
because
he's
gonna
go
through
my
side
of
my
property.
It
goes
into
the
green,
but
it
goes
through
my.
N
P
P
H
P
The
neighborhood
since
9686
I'm,
sorry
for
my
parents,
they
used
to
live
on
Sunset
when
I
moved
out,
I,
actually
I
love
the
neighborhood,
so
I
actually
moved
in
Century
City,
so
I've
been
living
there
since
2007.
Since
2007
we've
had
flood
issues
for
about
three
times
that
actually
went
for
our
home.
One
of
those
incidents
was
back
in
the
summer
of
2007
when
one
of
our
citizens
passed
away
and
in
the
creek
there's
no.
P
By
having
that
many
homes
have
no
the
the
reduce
area
like
the
single-family
reduce
area.
There's
too
many
homes
it
is,
it
is
overpopulated.
We
only
have
one
insurance,
one
exit,
the
other
exits
by
the
but
Salinas
Elementary
and
the
other
exit
by
Lost
Creek,
which
that's
a
totally
different
neighborhood
in
general.
P
A
One
thing
to
you:
there's
only
that
they're
requesting
for
single-family
residential,
so
they
cannot
put
apartments
on
there.
Okay,
okay,
they
would
have
to
come
back
to
the
city,
make
an
application
if
they
wanted
to
do
that
and
change
that
again
right
now
what
their
changes
is
basically
going
from.
A
P
O
Have
any
question
I
have
course
not
there's
a
gentleman
further
stop.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
What
what?
What?
What
are
your
thoughts
about
this
idea
that
you
have
proposed
development
in
an
old
neighborhood
and
Alvarado
neighborhood
when
it
was
originally
conceptualized
I
think
it
was
you
know,
gonna
have
one
concept
and
then
you
fast
forward.
40
years
later,
30,
40
years
later
and
and
now
there,
there
is
a
proposal
to
do
something.
O
That's
really
different
from
what
the
character
that
neighborhood
was
when
the
people
bought
it
and,
like
I,
think
that's
the
first
question
and
I
think
the
second
question
is
I
see
a
note
here
that
that
that,
in
main
coincide
or
may
fit
within
the
comprehensive
plan,
how
does
it
do
that
and
second
and
third
of
all,
is
if
the
value
of
the
current
homeowners
property
goes
down
because
of
these
smaller
Lots?
How
could
that
possibly
fit
within
the
the
complan?
B
It's
smaller
than
it
would
be
smaller
than
that.
Okay,
if
80%
of
that
14.4
acres
is
developed
into
homes,
considering
that
you
also
need
land
for
roads
and
and
other
things
you're.
Looking
at
about
83
homes
with
6,000
square
foot,
Lots
with
you
up
with
4,500
square
foot,
Lots
you'll
be
looking
around
111.
Now,
that's
just
an
estimate,
but
that's
using
20%
of
land
for
infrastructure,
the
other
80%
developed.
What
are
those
two
scenarios
you're
talking
about
between
20
and
30,
home
difference,
80
homes,
83
gnomes
versus
111
homes?
Now,
to
answer
your
question
about.
O
O
I,
don't
remember
the
total
history,
but
my
idea
was
I
think
the
idea
was
that
somehow
in
South
Florida
they
were
going
to
now
try
to
have
high
high
middle
income
families
moving
into
this
neighborhood,
so
it
was
kind
of
like
an
equivalent
of
like
something
a
neighborhood
he
might
have
found
in
North
Laredo
only
another
about
that
time,
but
it
was
in
being
in
south
or
a
tour.
Now
right,
I
think
the
idea
was
to
sort
of
create,
probably
devalue,
increase
property
values
there.
O
So
people
bought
thinking
that
and
so
now
we
move
for
30
years
later
and
now
we
have
this
new
proposal
with
smaller
Lots
much.
You
know
more
density,
obviously
more
people
living
there
more
traffic
issues,
and
so
how
do
we
as
a
commission,
analyze
that
problem?
And
so
that
was
the
first
question?
The
second
quarter,
a
gem
of
a
second.
B
One
can
I
well
there.
There
is
a
way
for
property
owners
to
work
this
out
and
essentially
what
what
you
might
think
what
you
could
consider
the
Commission
wanting
to
do
is
to
locate
what
might
be
between
two
people
or
to
come
in
and
make
it
is
basically
if
there
are
two
properties
adjacent
to
each
other.
B
There
are
legal
ways
that
they
can
restrict
development
on
the
other,
for
instance,
if
a
development
came
in
and
they
wanted
an
area
next
door
to
remain
green
space,
they
could
put
an
easement
on
that
green
space,
pay,
the
owner
of
that
property
money
and
and
take
away
their
right
to
develop
it,
and
then
government
doesn't
need
to
step
in
and
tell
what
they
can
do.
You
know
the
landowners
can
control
what
this
owner
can
do.
They
can
work
that
out
individually
in
in
some
cases.
B
That
does
happen
where
development
is
restricted
on
adjacent
properties,
because
people
want
to
know
forever
that
that's
going
to
remain
the
way
it
is
now
a
lot
of
times
what
happens
is
somebody
has
sold
a
home
or
a
property,
with
a
promise
that
oh
yeah,
that
that
beautiful
you
know
lot
next
door?
That's
not
devoted
its
gonna
stay
that
way,
or
it
will
develop
a
certain
way.
Rally
is
unless
there
is
a
legal
exchange
between
those
two
parties
trying
to
control.
That
is
not
it.
It's
not
a
great
way
to
do
that.
I
mean
there.
B
Are.
There
are
ways
I
think
that
oversteps
what
what
the
city
should
be
doing
now,
residents
do
have
an
ability
to
have
an
impact
on
how
land
use
is
done,
and
that's
what
we're
referring
to.
When
we
talk
about
the
future
land
use
plan,
we
split
up
the
city
and
into
different
residential
commercial
different
areas,
mixed
use
and
for
residential,
we're,
looking
at
low
density
for
medium
density
and
high
density
residential.
So.
N
B
I
O
Okay,
so,
but
so
I
guess
my
Latin,
so
that
answered
my
second
question.
My
third
question
is
still
what
what
if
I
mean,
I,
think
that
the
read
the
the
reason
behind
the
comp
plan
in
part
was
to
help
the
development
of
the
city
so
that
it
would
be
developed
in
a
smart
way
and
that
it
would
create
the
better
quality
of
life
for
the
citizens.
In
other
words,
the
whole
purpose
of
the
comp
line
essentially
was
to
improve
the
way
the
city
develops,
not
for
developers
necessarily
but
for
the
citizens
right.
O
So
here
you
know
and
I
don't
know,
I
don't
I
mean
I'm
speculating
at
this
point
right,
but
but
I
would
imagine
that
that
these
smaller
properties,
these
these
homes,
that
will
be
on
the
smart
locks.
Could
they
impact
the
property
values
of
that
part
of
the
city
that
neighborhood?
And
so,
if
that
is
true,
then
how
do
we
reconcile
that
with
the
vision
of
the
comp
plan,
which
is
essentially
to
improve
the
quality
of
life
for
citizens
and-
and
that
also
falls
in
line
with
their
that?
O
What
they've
talked
about
right
now,
which
is
you
know,
traffic?
You
know
people
not
respecting.
You
know,
you
know
I
guess
maybe
there's
covenants
and
conditions
there.
I,
don't
know
that
Jana
and
I
understand
this.
Are
private
rights
not
not
not
things
that
are
legislated
or
overseen
by
it
by
the
city
but
I,
just
I,
guess
that's.
My
question
is:
what's
the
thinking
behind
allowing
something
that
could
potentially
have
a
negative
impact
for
the
people
that
have
invested
there
for
30
years
and
and
and
should
we
be
analyzing
that
before
we
approve
this,
this
development?
B
We
can't
be
so
specific
to
speak
to
every
single
situation,
and
so
we
have
these
broad
principles
and
we
we
have
these
broad
rules
and
there
is
room
for
judgment
and
that's
what
this
body
is
for
to
make
a
judgment
call
now,
if
you're
asking
me,
my
professional
opinion
on
does
does
on
a
few
of
these
issues,
which
I
think
requires
some
expertise
in
answering.
The
research
has
shown
very
much
that
increased
density
next
door
does
not
have
a
negative
impact
on
on
development
and
the
way
that
you
can
test.
That
is
very
simple.
B
You
look
at
look
at
home
prices
and
the
way
that
they
go
up
over
time
and
you
select
a
few
areas.
You
look
at
an
area
where
something
was
built,
higher
density
next
to
it,
and
you
look
at
an
area
where
something
wasn't
built
higher
density
and
then
you
take
a
control
somewhere
where
the
same
thing
was
built
next
to
it,
and
many
of
those
studies
has
been
have
been
done
now.
B
In
some
cases
the
property
values
didn't
increase
as
much
as
neighboring
and
some
they
increased
more
because
there
were
other
reasons
why
why
development
occurred
in
that
area
and
for
that
same
reason,
that
area
was
more
desirable
than
other
areas
in
the
city,
so
it
it
has
an
impact.
It's
not
always
negative,
it's
not
always
positive,
but
on
the
whole,
there
isn't
a
significant
impact
to
neighbors,
because
there's
density
next
door,
and
if
you
want
that
research
I
can
get
that
for
and
you
can
look
at
it
cuz.
This
may
come
up.
Okay,
yeah.
O
B
We
have
the
comp
plan
to
guide
us
in
these
decisions
moving
forward,
but
they're
not
going
to
answer
every
single
question
and
again
that's
that's
what
your
job
is
is
a
Planning
Commission
member.
So
yes,
this
is
the
time
to
analyze
that
this
is
the
time
to
speak
with
with
him
about
his
proposed
project.
B
Now
he's
not
required
to
stick
to
any
plan
of
how
specifically
he's
going
to
build
these
homes,
but
obviously
he's
going
to
build
the
the
he's
going
to
try
and
get
the
most
money
he
can
for
the
development
that
he's
going
to
do.
The
main
difference
right
now
that
we're
looking
at
is
the
size
of
the
Lots
is
the
size
of
the
Lots
gonna
affect
the
size
of
the
home.
B
B
What
you're
looking
at
is
sort
between
80
and
90
homes
on
a
if
it
would
stay
what
it's
legally
zoned
now,
which
is
six
thousand
square
foot
Lots
or
if
you
reduce
that
to
forty
five
hundred
and
square
foot
Lots
you're,
looking
at
somewhere
around
one
hundred
and
ten
homes,
100
to
110
the
increase
of
20
to
30
homes.
At
around
of
that
amount,
total
I
have.
C
A
question,
mr.
chairman:
okay,
thank
you,
but
something
worth
noting
is
that
it's
been
it's
undeveloped,
land
for
those
3035
years
or
whatever
it
is
so
I
can't
imagine
that
adding
homes
would
decrease
value
in
comparison
to
being
next
to
vacant
land.
Does
that
makes?
Is
that
logical
or
is
that
the
correct.
B
C
B
The
answer
would
be
the
same
as
we
would
tell
you
now,
and
that
is
that,
no
matter
if
there
are
going
to
be
homes
on
4,500
square,
foot,
Lots
or
6,000
square
foot,
Lots,
nothing
will
get
built
unless
it
follows
the
land
development
code
and
the
building
code.
And
it's
done
for
the
proper
drainage
and
done
the
roads
are
done
as
they
should
and
and
so
there's
not
going
to
be
any
difference
in
the
standard
that
they're
going
to
up.
C
I
B
L
A
H
L
A
That's
what
I
was
going
to
ask
you
I,
think
I
think
if
we
go
back
and-
and
this
is
a
to
discuss
a
little
bit
of
what
happened
30
years
ago,
we
passed
forward
30
years,
the
cost
of
the
land
has
gone
up
substantially.
The
cost
of
a
subdivision
to
build
one
has
increased
substantially
too
and
and
because
I
think
are
those
factors
to
be
able
to
create
housing
within
the
means
of
people.
A
A
H
J
J
O
You
think
that
doing
this
kind
of
development
has
a
likelihood
of
keep
keeping
the
property
value
at
the
same
place.
That
is
now
for
the
neighborhood
that
exists
now,
or
do
you
think
it
has
likelihood
of
increasing
it
or
do
you
have
do
you
think
as
a
like
a
good,
if
decreasing
it?
Well,
you
don't
know
I
would.
O
This
I'm,
not
an
expert
and
I'm,
not
and
I,
wish
I
were
but
I.
Just
think
that
if
you're
gonna
ask
for
a
zone
change
you
either
it's
like
either
because
it's
already
existing
in
that
area
and
and
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
not
it,
do
it
because
you
know
it's
like
it's
like
the
items
we
had
earlier
today.
It's
like
me,
you
know,
maybe
prior
commissioners
had
no
problem
with
developing
a
part
of
an
area
with
trailers.
You
know,
maybe
in
hindsight
it
was
a
terrible
idea
to
do
it
in
that
area.
I!
O
No,
you
know
like
I,
don't
like
the
fact
that
there's
all
this
warehousing,
our
minds,
Road
I,
mean
I,
think
that
it's
one
of
the
most
beautiful
areas
of
the
city,
but
you
know
I
mean
what
can
you
do
about
it
now?
It's
all
there
now
right.
You
know
so
I
get
that
right,
but
then,
on
the
other
side
is,
you
know
like
if
you
already
have
an
existing
neighborhood
and
you're
gonna
change
in
some
fundamental
way.
O
O
The
only
value
that
that's
the
only
principle
we're
gonna
fall
Lobel.
Then.
Why
even
have
a
zoning
commission
right,
say
anytime,
anyone's
gonna
do
anything
you
might
as
well
just
do
it
I
mean
because
there's
nothing
there
now.
So,
let's
do
it
right.
So
there's
gotta
be
more
principles
than
that,
but.
A
G
Rules
in
place
there
are
rules
in
place.
Okay,
in
fact,
if
I
may
I
think
what
it
comes
down
to
a
supply
and
demand
and
all
what
they're
asking
for
is
to
is
to
keep
it
single-family
but
they're.
What
you're
asking
for
is
to
go
down
to
a
smaller
lot
size
to
make
it
more
affordable
for
more
people
to
have
to
go
in
and.
G
Know
a
home
I
can
totally
understand
how
the
residents
originally
thought
that
it
was
gonna,
be
an
r1
and
it
was
supposed
to
stay
that
way.
But
of
course
you
look
there
30
years
down
forward
and
part
one's,
not
in
demand
for
that
area
and
I'm
sure
the
developer
needs
to
do
something
with
that
property.
G
So
you
know-
and
they
did
mention
in
their
comments-
that
they
are
seeing
where
some
of
the
homeowners
are
no
longer
homeowners
and
actually
splitting
the
house,
and
you
have
multi
families
in
homes
where
they
should
be
single
families,
so
going
to
a
single
home
I'm
going
to
a
smaller
lot
you're
going
to
or
you
can
hope
that
the
person
that's
buying
the
house
is
gonna,
be
a
single
family,
family-owned
owner.
You
know
so
I
think
it
comes
down
to
supply
and
demand.
B
I
make
one
comment:
Carlos
there
there
are
times
when
it
is
clearly
when
somebody's
actually
asking
for
something
that
is
say.
The
future
land
use
map
was
something
entirely
different,
and
so
the
city's
vision
for
that
is
totally
inconsistent.
What's
being
asked,
keep
in
mind
that
you're,
not
the
final
approving
authority,
you're
sending
a
recommendation
to
Council
and
they
will
be
the
final
approving
body
or
denying
body,
and
so
ultimately
it
is
a.
B
It
is
a
decision
that
elected
officials
get
to
get
to
make
and
in
in
that
way,
it's
a
decision
that
the
public's
making
through
them
to
say
what
do
they
want
to
see.
So
for
me
to
tell
you
what
answer
is
right
or
wrong?
It's
not
as
much
about
right
or
wrong
as
you're
right.
What?
What
does
the
REA
don't
want
to
see
for
this
area
and
the
guidance
that
we
give?
You
is
general,
it's
the
future
land
use
map.
It's
it's
the
direction
of
the
city
wanting
to
move
to.
B
You
know
away
from
more
suburban
style,
big
style
lots
and
towards
more
smaller,
more
sustainable,
more.
You
know
less
water
that
those
are
general
ideas,
but
the
specifics
have
to
be
decided
by
land
is
ultimately
your
decision
for
what
recommendation
you
send
the
council
and
we,
of
course,
with
respect
that.
A
C
C
A
P
P
O
C
G
A
Me
see
a
show
of
hands
because
go
ahead
all
right,
those
against
by
by
saying
aye,
you
against
all
right
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
the
many.
This
only
notices
the
city
loiter
by
rezoning
approximately
three
point:
nine
five
acres
located
south
of
Harrison
of
Memorial
Highway
and
from
b3
to
r1a.
A
A
O
A
G
A
A
All
right:
the
next
item
is
the
many
ways
to
delenn
development.
So
chapter
24,
section
24,
four,
one,
seven,
seven
point:
two
number:
eight,
we've
titled
front
yard
setback
requirements
by
adding
subsection
D
intended
to
another
construction
and
car
ports
up
to
the
property
line,
major
vertically
subject
to
easements
site
visibility
and
minimum
parking
requirements.
Q
Hearing
yes,
sir
Jerry
meets
on
active
building
official
building
development
services.
We've
come
before
you
at
the
percent,
some
of
the
changes
that
dimensional
standards
were
posting,
but
in
making
sure
that
we
all
understood
the
different
changes
were
posting.
There
was
one
item
the
world
in
favor,
and
that
was
a
cardboard
allowing
the
cart
works
to
be
extended
up
to
the
property
line
vertically,
no
more
beyond
that,
and
obviously
respecting
easements
right
away
in
that
end,
that
it
remains
as
a
carport.
Several
issues
come
to
mind.
Q
D
C
We
know
we've
already
been
through
this,
but
I
know
he's
repeating
it,
but
I
believe
what
we,
what
we
did.
Our
last
meeting
was
as
a
nun
to
the
sign
of
respect,
but
as
an
appreciation
to
was
just
night
and
then
or
the
D
it's
night
that
he
said
he
asked
the
time
to
present,
but
but
information
together
in
workshops
for
us
and
get
all
the
data
together
before
we
even
voted
on
this
iPhone.
Is
that
not
correct?
No.
B
This
is
a
little
different
with
the
taking
the
easements
in
the
entire
city,
I'll
be
taking
the
setbacks
and
reducing
them
to
five
feet.
That
was
what
we
were
looking
at
for
liveable
areas
for
places,
somebody
a
part
of
a
home
there's
a
lot
more.
That
goes
into
that
with
Building,
Code
and
planning.
You
know
in
the
development
code
that
needs
to
be
changed
alongside
that,
we
can't
make
that
massive
change
without
doing
that
review
getting
of
the
data.
This
is
different.
It's
it's!
B
No
I'm,
Seuss,
the
carport
and
I
know
there
are
other
things
that
mean
to
be
looked
at,
but
the
cause
here
that
it's
still
subject
to
other
restrictions
that
are
in
the
land
of
element
code
like
the
easements
visibility
and
and
parking
requirements
in
an
ideal
world.
Yes,
we
we
we,
we
could
wait
for
more
analysis,
but
I
understand
you
all
have
had
time
to
discuss
this
and
the
TRB
board
as
well,
and
we
did
a
pure
decision,
but
it's
actually.
H
B
Year
year
and
a
half
we're
going
to
be
working
on
that
getting
public
input
explaining
the
public,
what
we're
doing
going
through
the
land
development
code
analyzing
getting
you
data
answer
questions
about
the
impact,
how
many
properties
acted?
We
shrink
setbacks
and
in
what
areas
and
whether
denominator,
so
we're
going
to
go
through
all
that.
But
this
is
a
little
simpler,
a
little
easier,
and
so
our
staff
recommendation
is
that
that
you
send
a
positive
recommendation
to
Council
on
this.
Mr.
chairman,
this
is
again.
A
A
A
By
a
look,
they
called
lot
averaging,
okay
that
we
took
out
of
the
code
many
years
ago,
because
that
was
problematic
letter
a
still
speaks
to
that
a
little
bit
and
my
concern
with
letter
A
right
now
is
this
that
if
you
read
it
verbatim
the
way
it
reads
if
your
structure
is
on
a
20
foot,
setback
built
at
18
feet
from
the
property
line,
and
you
come
in
and
ask
for
a
building
extension
or
a
carport.
How
is
that
interpretation
that
it
be
done?
Is
it
going
to?
A
Q
Well,
I
think
one
of
the
reasons
we
separate
it
and
I
guess
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is
that
we're
gonna
look
at
extending
any
other
part
of
the
building
beyond
the
current
setback,
whether
it
be
in
the
front
or
be
in
the
rear
or
after
the
site's.
The
only
thing
we're
asking
for
right
now
is
a
carport,
and
that's
that
all-
and
you
know
what,
and
so
we
weren't
we're
gonna
look
at
this
section,
particularly
6a
and.
A
B
Exactly
why
we're
doing
this
redoing
the
code?
Well,
that's
one
of
the
reasons
yeah,
because
there
are
many
places
if
we
wanted
to,
we
could
spend
many
days.
This
meeting
would
last
for
many
days
looking
at
how
the
code
is
contradictory
in
some
places
are
not
clear,
a
good
code,
that's
well
written.
There
is
little
room
for
interpretation.
No,
you
can't
make
it
so
there's
no
room
because
then
it's
very
restrictive
and
it
would
be
very
long
so
we're
gonna
we're
gonna,
combine
simplicity,
but
also
clarity.
B
We're
gonna
try
to
achieve
that
with
the
new
code
and
and
again
like
I,
said
before.
The
idea
is
to
allow
within
reason,
property
owners
to
maximize
what
they
can
do
with
property,
knowing
that
what
they
do
on
their
property
impacts,
others
their
neighbors
as
well,
for
it
to
some
degree,
sometimes
possibilities.
R
A
A
A
G
A
O
H
G
A
A
Okay,
in
any
case,
believe
what
the
proposal
proposal
this
here
is
the
bloody
land
order,
gateway
builders,
LT
be
represented
by
hurdle
Salinas.
It's
formally
requested
the
proposed
three
closure
sale,
call
Street,
closure
and
sale
and
have
some
supplies
to
all
requirements,
including
administrative
fees,
bracelet
cost
survey,
costs
and
release
forms.
S
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Linda
pimiento
with
a
community
development,
real
estate
division
and
you've
pretty
much
summarized
our
entire
presentation.
So
Jerry
Salinas
is
the
interested
party
that
is
looking
to
purchase
the
street.
He
has
met
all
the
criteria
of
the
of
the
ordinance
in
by
virtue
of
city
charter.
He
can
purchase
the
streets
and
we've
already
gone
through
that
Utility
Commission
wanted
his
surveys
and
also
the
appraisal.
So
we're
looking
for
the
support
of
the
planning,
Zoning
Commission
to
facilitate
this
cell
and
then
pending
the
authorization
from
Council.
S
S
S
So
this
is
meadow
Street
right
here.
He
currently
owns
the
business.
That
is
right
here.
It's
a
storage
facility.
This
is
the
area
that
he
wants
to
purchase
Naomi,
let's
see
how
we'll
eventually
sell
he
is
the
abutting
property
owner
and
Naomi
has
already
expressed
her
desire
that
she
will
be
selling
her
land
over
to
mr.
Salinas
he's
looking
to
expand
his
building
business
right
here,
which
is
a
storage
facility
and.
C
S
C
C
G
C
A
We
have
is
the
review
and
reconsideration
was
prescient
deceased
master
plan.
The
intent
is
residential
and
commercial
purpose
of
this
revision
is
to
reconfigure
phases
and
realign
streets.
This
is
a
170
acre
tract
located
west
of
Concord,
Hill
development
and
east
of
what
oriented
roads
its
own
for
the
Saturday
pilot
development
is
a
Geo
one
or
180,
and
before
the
tracks
located
in
district
2
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
the
Planning
Department
from
fire
from
water
and
utilities
topic
safety.
T
Good
evening
mr.
chairman
Commission
Ricardo,
via
Valley
with
howling
engineering
and
serving
here
representing
the
client
we
do.
We
would
like
to
discuss
a
couple
of
the
comments.
Just
for
clarification
purposes,
comment
number
three
renumber
phase.
One
is
phase
14
now
phase
one
on
the
master
plan
that
was
the
old
face,
14
that
we
had
approved
prior
to
this
master
plan.
T
One
of
the
comments
before
was
to
read
name
the
phases,
but
at
the
same
time
both
of
those
went
in
so
I
know
it's
just
whichever
preference
planning
once
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
keep
14
and
then
keep
the
old
master
plan,
I
guess
because
of
the
numbers
or
change
them
back
to
one,
because
I
can
go
to
face
14
and
rename
it
to
phase
one
which
is
I.
Believe
speaking
of
plan,
II
I
think
that's
what
they.
T
E
T
Then,
but
everything
else
hasn't
changed:
14
15,
16
17,
so
we
go
back
to
the
older
okay.
It's
just
clarification
on
that
and
a
couple
more
here.
Well,
first
I
do
like
to
apologize.
I
know
this
projects
been
up
on
the
agenda
for
public
last
month
and
a
half,
maybe
the
last
3-4
meetings
and
we've
tabled
it.
There
was
an
agreement.
The
reason
this
master
plan
is
up
and
see.
If
I
can.
T
The
previous
master
plan
did
did
not
have
access
to
the
southern
neighbor,
which
believe
it
was
cuatro
Vientos
a
new
purchaser
came
and
purchased
close
to
a
thousand
total
acres
in
South
Laredo.
They
had
approached
my
client
JM
LG
to
see
if
we
can
punch
a
local
collector
through
the
property
to
give
them
access
and
kind
of
give
more
connectivity
for
the
future
development
in
this
area
in
that
agreement.
Obviously,
agreements
aren't
done
overnight.
So
there
was
some
projections
on
when
it
was
going
to
be
completed.
T
We
had
some
time
frames
that
were
extended
and
extended
extended.
Therefore,
that's
was
the
reasoning
we
were
tabeling.
It
disagreement
finally
got
approved
and
got
signed
last
week.
That's
why
we're
finally
here,
but
that
was
the
main
reason
in
exchange
for
that
for
that
road
and
the
water
and
sewer
the
utilities
to
get
there.
T
The
the
client
or
the
owner
of
los
pacientes
in
gemology
acquire
close
to
20
acres,
which
you
see
here
as
phase
4
and
phase
5
within
that
agreement
as
well-
and
this
is
part
of
one
of
the
comments
which
is
a
comment
number
four
is
in
that
agreement.
The
owner,
the
adjacent
owner,
cuatro
Vientos,
wanted
to
keep
ownership
of
the
future
road,
which
is
Isla
Metis.
But,
however,
my
client
has
permission
to
build
that
road
once
he
does
these
future
phases.
T
I
didn't
include
that
on
there,
because
technically,
that
land
isn't
part
of
this
master
plan,
but
there's
an
agreement
that
I
can
furnish
that
states
that
that
road
is
going
to
be
built
between
both
of
them.
So
that
will
give
access
to
these
two
roads
down
here,
which
there's
a
couple
of
comments
on
here
by
fire
by
you,
ISD
that
are
kind
of
asking
for
that
axis.
It'll.
T
Honest
they
got
annexed
on
Monday
final
read,
so
the
final
reading
is
just
allowing
the
execution
of
it.
So
now
it's
just
simple
logistics
as
far
as
getting
the
city
manager
to
sign
it
and
and
putting
it
into
play,
but
annexation
already
went
in
final
reading.
Was
this
past
Monday,
so
these
20
acres
would
already
in
there.
We
do,
however,
have
to
go
for
the
reason
there
are
some
about
eight
or
nine
Lots
down
there
that
are
off
of
the
annexation
that
came
in
as
AG.
T
We're
gonna
provide
that
recent
r1e,
which
is
this
areas,
are
winning
okay
other
than
that
I
do
know.
There's
a
general
comment.
Comment,
number,
nine,
no
double
furniture,
Lots
I
understand
the
purpose
of
that
loss.
President
is
local
collector.
You
don't
want
any
access
off
of
that.
However,
there
are
some
lots
that
are
on
corners
that
sometimes
require
a
driveway.
That
is
not
your
typical
driveway
kind
of
half
moon
driveway.
T
We
would
like
to
at
least
give
the
option
on
those
Lots,
but
definitely
no
double
frontage
on
local
collectors
or
close
to
intercept
close
to
a
major
intersection
off
a
local
collector.
Those
presidentÃs
loss
precedent
is
on
here.
It
may
look
like
if
it's
included
in
the
master
plan.
Only
a
small
connection
is
included
the
rest
of
it
as
I.
Don't
know
if
the
Commission
knows,
but
it
got
put
on
the
the
capital
improvement
project
where
the
city
is
pitching
in
some
money.
T
So
is
the
RMA
as
well
as
some
other
entities
to
build
this
road.
It's
already
been
funded,
my
understanding,
so
our
responsibility
or
the
clients,
responsibility,
hilltop
and
and
geology-
is
to
donate
the
that
way.
Design
should
be
starting
in
the
next
couple
of
months,
so
this
is
going
to
be
this
little
spicy
that
this
is
going
to
be
built
to
Concord
Hills,
which
is
going
to
give
this
area
that
extremely
extremely
needed.
Second
out
other
than
that
clarification
on
some
of
those
comments.
T
T
T
E
Not
everything
else
yeah,
because
it
because
you
get
into
the
issue
of
the
timing
and
we
just
can't
have
a
so
division.
That's
yes,
I
mean
that's
built,
there's
no
way
to
get
there
and
that's
kind
of
where
the
communism
and
I
understand
we
don't.
Obviously
we
wouldn't
want
for
any
agreements
or
anything
to
fall
apart.
I
mean,
obviously
that's
the
intent
for
anyone,
but
I
mean
there's
got
to
be
that
guarantee
of
some
sort,
but.
T
I
can't
know
exactly
how
it's
written
I'm,
not
an
attorney
but
I,
knowing
that
that
little
area
and
that
that
agreement,
it
does
specifically
state
I,
don't
know
if
it's
an
actual
easement
or
it
I
did
do
the
I
did
the
exhibits
that
show
okay.
This
is
phase
one.
This
is
what's
gonna
be
built,
so
I
do
know
it's
it's
pictorially
there
and
it's
mentioned
in
there
that
this
road
is
going
to
be
built.
Obviously
we
know
we
cannot
come
in
with
a
plaque
without
access
right.
T
We
know
we,
we
have
done
some
projects
where-
and
this
happens
more
often
than
not
it's.
We
just
did
a
project
in
the
industrial
park
in
North,
Laredo
North
Laurel
industrial
park,
which
phase
two
is
on
the
agenda
later
on
today,
the
bigger
owner
Ruth
injure,
wanted
to
keep
control
when
the
roads
are
going
to
be
built,
so
he
gave
permission
to
the
land.
The
developers
have
bought
a
piece
of
property.
You
can
build
a
road
when
you
come
in,
but
I
don't
want
to
wait
for
you
to
build
the
road.
T
T
A
It
is
in
a
required
document,
yeah,
absolutely
because
I
mean
once
in
and
of
course,
for
this
master
plan
to
go
forth.
I
mean
our
common
they'll
have
to
be
on
there
that
it
would
require
that
there
is
a
signed
agreement
for
the
construction
of
this
road.
I've
said
it
out
of
this
master
plan
as
a
conditional
poop.
Absolutely,
yes,
that's
the
only
way
we
can
control
what
access
point
is
going
to
be
on
and.
A
That
too,
that
lands
out
of
your
control
I
understand
that
too,
but
we
just
need
to
have
an
assurance
that
we're
gonna
have
a
continuation.
Oh
you've
already
made
that
assurance,
but
the
best
thing
to
do
is
have
everything
wood
used
to
writing
absolutely
and
made
it
a
part
of
the
agreement
here.
The
master
plan-
yes,
sir
well
and.
C
E
T
The
challenge
of
tabling
that
is,
that
that
can't
proceed
with
the
phase.
That's
on
right
after
this
that's
two
items
after
which
is
phase
four
day
14
without
a
proved
master
plan,
not
that
theoretically
I
can't
proceed
is
if
I
were
to
turn
it
into
one-stop
shop
or
yeah
they're
gonna
they're
gonna
come
back
now,
I,
don't
mind
it
being
approved,
subject
to
the
revision
of
providing
that
document.
If
I,
don't
and
and
and
granted,
this
isn't
an
area,
that's
not
being
developed
right
now.
You
know
whatever
happens
in
this
area.
T
T
T
A
C
A
A
A
O
E
K
T
A
Not
I
think
what
we
can
do
here
is.
We
can
do
a
conditional
approval
subject
to
that
letter
being
turned
in
and
that
agreement
I'm.
Sorry
and
that's
why
I
was
trying
to
get
a
you
know
a
timeframe
on
it
so
that
you
know
things
flow
I
mean,
but
if
that
letter
doesn't
come
in
within,
let's
say
that's
why
I
said
30
days
in
terms
of
the
30
days
that
conditional
approval
goes
away,
and
you
know
you
here
back
to
square
one.
T
A
A
A
Okay,
preliminary
consideration
of
a
plan
Lobos
in
Seward
faced
nine,
the
antennas
residential.
This
is
a
ten
point.
Two
four
acre
tract
located
south
of
Wormser
Road
and
East,
the
cuatro
Vientos
Road
and
north
of
Loma
zetsu
Boulevard,
there's
only
four
sixty
seven
lot
development
is
Arwen,
a
the
track
is
located
in
district
1.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments:
from
Planning
from
engineering
from
modern
utilities,
traffic
safety.
T
With
Halloween
in
June
for
the
record
representing
the
client
just
for
a
clarification
again,
a
same
project
as
last
time,
the
next
phase
annexation
got
approved
on
Monday,
just
for
a
classification
on
that
comment
and
make
it
just
as
stated
on
the
record,
if
you
all
have
any
questions
on
this
phase,
I'd
be
glad
to
answer
yeah,
and
we
concur
with
that
recommendation.
Okay,.
O
A
T
T
T
The
central
power
and
light
easement
here
there's
just
a
line
and
it
got
moved
as
far
as
I'm.
Sorry,
not
since
Ron
padlocked
part.
Ladies
men
there's
a
track
in
here
from
this
boundary
line
to
this
dash
line
there,
that
in
between
there's
owned
by
CK
now
and
that's
outside
the
city
limits,
so
you
see
in
the
plat
some
some
City
over
to
city
limits
and
Webb
County.
It's
because
in
that
this
whole
piece
in
here
right,
you
still.
T
I
do
want
to
mention
I'm
gonna
probably
should
have
called
the
planning
department,
but
this
plan
also
that
right
now
phase
one
is
being
constructed,
but
it
hasn't
been
recorded.
Yet
so
I
think
there
shouldn't
be
a
comment
that
this
plant
can
be
recording
until
phase
one
gets
recorded.
So
I'll
go
ahead
and
add
that
comment
on
on
that.
Just
for
you
know
just
so
y'all
know
on
the
same
page.
N
A
B
I'm
sorry
Jerry
before
you
adjourn
I'd
like
to
just
take
a
minute
or
two.
That's
all
right
sure.
Just
have
a
few
things
for
to
discuss.
One
is
if
you're
okay
I
would
like
to
add
a
regular
item.
Directors
comments
at
the
end
performed
your
adjournment
just
to
update
you
on
things
that
are
happening.
Sure
it
would.
The
intent
of
it
would
only
be
a
few
minutes
at
the
end
of
a
I
mean
just
to
for
you
ask
questions
or
to
keep
you
updated
on
things.
B
That
I
feel
would
be
pertinent
to
client
commissioners
that'd
be
okay
for
us
to
add
that
okay,
the
next
comments
are
more
just
questions.
I
want
to
ask
if
there's
anything
that
staff
can
do
to
make
your
job
as
Planning
Commission's
easier.
If,
if
there's
a
way
that
we
can
change
the
way
we're
presenting
information
or
the
packets,
if
there's
a
time
that
would
be
better
we'd
have
that
would
be
by
ordinance
that
we'd
have
to
change
that.
B
But
if
there
were
another
time
that
worked
better,
such
as
five
o'clock
versus
six
o'clock,
that's
also
a
question
and
how
the
materials
are
prepared
and
how
they're
how
you're
receiving
them.
If
everything
is
going
fine
with
that,
and
if
you
have
any
comments
about
that
and
then
lastly
trainings,
if
there's
anything,
you'd
like
to
be
trained
on,
maybe
during
a
work
session
where
we
could
go
into
depth
on
an
area
that
not
something
related
to
an
item
but
something
more
general
you'd
like
to
get
some
more
experience
on
and
I
could
come
back.
B
A
good
example
would
be
maybe
not
on
its
own,
but
as
part
of
something
more,
we
could
include
looking
at
some
of
those
studies.
I
referred
to
that
talk
about
how
the
impact,
because
this
will
come
often
we'll
come
in
and
say
what
you're
gonna
do.
What
you're
proposing
is
gonna
hurt
the
value
of
my
land
there's
actually
some
great
studies
that
show
that
it's
not
so
intuitive
what
happened
next,
what
happens
next
door
the
impact
of
what
it
has
on
property?
B
So
is
there,
though,
so
those
questions
is
the
time
that
we're
meeting
you
feel
comfortable.
That
or
do
you
have
any
interest
in
looking
into
adjusting
that
are
the
materials
the
way
we're
getting
them
to?
You
is
everything,
okay,
with
that
how
the
meeting
is
is
going
anything
that
we
can
do
to
make
your
job
as
commissions.
You
hear
comments
well.
A
I
think
that,
as
far
as
far
as
it
tangles
six
o'clock
I
think
it's
good,
because
most
people
that
work
will
get
out
of
work
at
5:00
gives
them
an
hour
to
get
to
the
Commission.
We,
if
we
move
into
five
we'll
have
I
think
a
hard
time
for
some
of
the
individuals
in
our
magician
to
get
here.
I
think
six
work
for.
A
A
L
A
A
O
My
question
is:
how
do
we
know
that
it's
doing
that
or
so
I
would
like
to
have
a
training
on
the
comprehensive
plan
that
we
approved
and
how
comprehensive
plan
is
implemented,
because
it's
not
clear
to
me
right
now,
at
least
in
this
field.
Maybe
it's
maybe
it's
taken
off
in
some
other
in
other
departments,
in
the
city
and
and
and
and
I'm
wrong,
but
at
least
in
this
area
I
mean.
C
Mister
local
commissioner,
Lou
and
I
are
new
on
this,
and
we
didn't.
We
weren't
afforded
a
an
orientation
at
all.
We
just
showed
up
and
started
listening
and
trying
to
catch
up
and
figure
it
out
stuff,
and
if
I
asked
as
many
questions
as
I
feel
like
a
of
information,
I
want
to
know,
we've
blocked
down
the
reading
by
an
additional
hour,
and
so
we
could,
you
can
put
together
a
good
orientation.
C
B
And
we
will
do
that.
I
think
it
will
be
very
helpful
for
you
to
understand
not
only
what
a
Planning
Commission
is
and
the
purpose
of
it
in
many
cities,
but
specifically
what
what's
in
our
code
relating
to
how
the
Commission
should
act.
It's
always.
Sometimes
there
are
some
unique
things
for
each
Commission,
but
generally
they
operate
in
the
same
fashion
and
I
will
go
through
the
comprehensive
plan
with
you
and
talk
about
the
highlights.
Oh
I'll
just
speak
a
minute
to
your
comment.
B
There
is
a
whole
industry
surrounding
how
we
develop
our
communities
and
that
can't
change
on
a
dime.
It's
it's
a
process,
and
last
night
I
was
at
the
kickoff
the
kick
off
for
the
Parade
of
Homes.
It
was
put
on
by
the
yes,
the
Laredo
Builders
Association,
so
in
attendance.
We're
builders
developers,
lenders
mortgage
banks,
all
those
people
that
are
in
that
industry
and
they
have
a
way
that
they've
been
building
and
comprehensive.
H
C
B
To
the
bathroom
there's
only
here,
I'm
taking
action
on
an
item
but
you're
fine
to
continue.
We
can
continue
to
discuss
this
okay,
because
what
I'm
not
asking
you
it's
fine
to
make
any
decision,
but
basically,
yes,
we'll
do
that.
We'll
provide
that
and
the
impact
of
the
comprehensive
plan
is
going
to
take
time
for
some
things.
For
others,
it's
going
to
be
quick.
The
biggest
thing
that
we're
moving
forward
on
is
what
I'm
calling
project
recode,
but
it's
it's
replacing
the
land
development
code
and
updating
it.
B
That's
gonna
have
a
significant
impact
on
what's
allowed
now.
Is
it
going
to
be
positive
or
negative,
or
are
people
gonna
be
happy
about
it
or
upset
about
it?
It's
really
going
to
depend
on
the
details.
Some
people
will
love
what
it's
going
to
allow
and
some
people
long
as
you
sleep
tonight.
You
know
density
even
a
little
bit.
Even
a
tiny
amount
is
going
to
make
people
nervous
and
you
know
worry
about
the
value
of
the
property
and
worry
about
their
quality
of
life.
I'll.
O
Just
make
one:
that's
nothing,
I,
think
part
of
the
reason
about
that
is
because
there's
a
lot
of
mistrust
towards
some
developers.
You
know
and
again.
That
was
why
my
comment
was
this:
if,
if
this
development
was
an
enhance,
that's
part
of
the
city
in
fundamental
way,
then
I
don't
think
there
would
be
anybody
here
in
officers.
Your
people
would
be
excited,
they'd
be
like
man.
This
is
gonna,
be
great
right,
but,
like
here
just
seems
like
they're
just
trying
to
fit
more
lots
into
there.
O
Just
try
some
more
homes,
which
again
I
understand
that
a
developer
has
the
right
to
do
that
and
I
get
that
like
I,
understand
I'm,
not
against
people
making
money,
but
it's
just
like
like:
when
does
a
complan
come
in
to
sort
of
guide
us
in
terms
of
whether
this
is
a
good
idea
or
a
bad
idea?
And
that's
that's
the
question
and
I,
but
I
think
it's.
H
B
You'd
like
to
come
by
the
plank
or
set
something
up
to
get
a
little
more
individual
insight
onto
any
of
these
issues
feel
free
we're
here
to
help
you
were
here.
You
know
working
for
you
to
inform
you
on
these
decisions
that
you
have
to
make,
and
but
will
it
schedule
those
trainings
so
that
we
have
time
excellent
to
you.
I.