►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 050423
Description
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 050423
A
A
B
A
So
this
the
item
that
the
citizen
comments
are
in
reference
to
item
9f,
which
I
believe
is
a
final
flat
so
that
that
particular
section
of
items
that
does
not
entail
public
hearing
I
mean
public
comments.
So
we're
going
to
do
is
do
the
general
comments
at
this
at
this
time
now
so
I
have
a
list
of
review.
A
G
H
B
H
I
H
H
H
This
is
a
1.6
acre,
I
mean
1.6
inch
rain,
we've
gone
through
eight
inches
of
rain
one
day
during
Hurricane,
so
we've
never
had
that
kind
of
flooding
on
Pico
Road.
This
is
a
public
Improvement
that
you
guys
are
dealing
with.
Now.
It's
not
just
private
land,
we're
dealing
with
the
after
effects
of
that
private
land,
but
the
county
has
to
deal
with
this
infrastructure.
That's
being
overloaded
and
overrun
by
the
runoff.
I
H
Ultimate
100,
Year
design
storm
event
shall
be
used
in
determining
the
required
retention
volume
for
the
development
side.
You're
supposed
to
look
you're
supposed
to
look
at
a
hundred
year
floodplain.
This
was
a
1.6
inch
Ray
that
we
got.
It
was
the
first
rain
that
we
got.
They
basically
torn
out
all
1
600
acres,
even
though
you've
not
granted
plant
approval
on
all
of
it.
They've
cleared
it
out
now
it
says
the
discharge
rate
from
the
facility.
H
H
Well,
the
developer
has
to
prepare
a
storm
water
discharge
plant
plan
for
the
whole
thousand
six
Hundred
Acre
Site.
That
plan
is
presented
to
the
city,
engineer,
I,
hope
she's
here,
because
he
should
answer
to
that.
The
city
engineer
reviewed
that
plan
and
approve
that
plan.
Obviously,
that
plan
is
not
working,
because
you
will
see
evidence
of
that
with
the
rest
of
the
people
that
are
coming
behind
me.
H
H
B
A
H
Yes,
thank
you,
sir.
So
what
to
do
you're
going
to
hear
from
Mr
Rodriguez,
who
was
literally
flooded
out
of
his
home
on
a
1.6
inch
event.
There
was
a
0.6
inch
event
that
also
ran
into
his
home
people,
who
are
fearful
of
a
four
six
eight
inch
rain
in
the
middle
of
the
night
and
you'll
see
evidence
of
why
they're
fearful
so
what
to
do
about
it.
H
The
engineer
under
the
code
is
supposed
to
look
at
the
effects
of
the
downstream
discharge,
that's
caused
by
the
development.
That's
his
duty,
that's
his
responsibility
to
look
at
what
is
happening.
Downstream
he's
not
looked
at
that
because,
as
you
can
see,
she
apparently
approved
a
plan
that
doesn't
work.
H
H
L
Good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
my
name
is
Juan.
Rodriguez
I
live
in
a
346
at
pico
Road
since
1992
for
31
years
and
back
in
those
days
there
used
to
be
on
the
north
side
of
our
property,
not
in
a
property,
but
on
the
north
side
of
the
property
there
was
there
used
to
be
a
stock
tank
or
a
pressure.
Whatever
you
want
to
call
it,
and
in
1999,
Laredo
was
hit
by
Hurricane
Brett,
and
the
eye
of
the
hurricane
went
right
over
Laredo.
L
Now
it
doesn't,
it
rains
barely
an
inch
and
a
half,
and
we
float
I,
don't
know
if
there's
any,
if
there's
any
images
of
the
videos
or
whatever
that
we
sent,
but
anyway,
the
the
flooring
gets
bad
I
mean
sometimes
it
it
comes
in
at
two
in
the
morning
when
it's
dark
and
the
home
starts
making
creaking
noises.
You
know
grinding
noises,
it's
scary
and
I,
don't
know
what
else
to
say.
Besides,
you
know
the
fact
that
every
time
I
see
me
and
my
family,
we
see
rain
clouds.
L
We
feel
apprehensive
about
this
because
it's
it's
scary,
when
you
have
so
much
water,
rushing
through
your
property
and
we
had
to
level
the
home
several
times
already
cost
money.
We,
it
came
to
a
point
of
her.
We
had
to
build
a
wall
around
the
home.
You
can
see
on
the
images
there
a
concrete
brick
wall
to
keep
the
water
from
going
under
the
home
and
and
keep
it
keep
from
spending
the
money
leveling
the
home
because
it
was,
it
is
bad.
L
M
M
M
M
A
better
idea:
this
is
my
place
right
here.
That's
my
place
right
there,
where
those
two
blue
circles
are
at
there's
the
the
stuff
where
they
built
two
ponds
and
I
measure
them
the
other
day.
I
might
be
wrong
a
little
bit
what
I
measured.
It
was
300
feet
by
200
feet
and
10
feet.
Deep,
that's
a
lot
of
water.
They
can
retain.
The
only
thing
is
it
says
retaining
pond
to
me.
It
says
it's
supposed
to
hold
something:
it
doesn't
hold.
Anything
I
got
pictures
where
they
built
some
drainage,
I.
M
M
And
I
spoke
to
them
back
in
September
of
last
year,
when
we
had
six
inches
of
rain
I
couldn't
get
to
my
place.
Okay
and
I
got
some
animals
over
there
matter
of
fact.
This
morning
my
son
lives
there
I
have
a
son
and
my
grandson
that
lived
there
and
he
they
called
me
this
morning.
I
said
dad.
You
know
what
the
animals
got
out.
What's
this,
how
did
they
get
out?
M
M
M
M
It's
unfortunate
that
we're
having
a
lot
of
glare
but
I,
don't
know
right
there
where
that
pole
is
that
was
over
there
by
the
fence
and
the
fence
is
already
on
the
top
and
that's
where
my
animals
are
getting
out
and
I
went
out
there
and
tried
to
fix
it
and
you
fix
it.
But
it's
like
I
tell
you
every
time
it
rains
it's
going
to
eat
up
more
soil
and
more
soil.
M
M
B
Mr
chairman,
if
I
may
so
Mr
Lando
did
come
to
our
office
I
believe
we
had
the
Rangel
family
also
come
to
our
offices
to
to
just
let
us
know
about
these
issues,
we
we
did
report
it
to
our
engineering
department
that
went
out
and
did
a
physical
investigation
out
there.
Biko
Road
does
not
belong
to
us,
belongs
to
the
county,
but
we
we
called
them
also
so
that
they
could
send
out
inspectors.
They
did
that
also.
B
So
we
we
take
these
comments
seriously.
You
know
we
want
to
make
sure
that
everything
was
okay,
but
we
did
take
their
message
and
we
forward
it
to
the
proper
people
to
look
at
it,
and
so
we
did
that
part.
The
plot
was
actually
held
a
little
bit
longer,
so
that
we'd
give
enough
time
for
an
investigation
to
see.
B
B
Letters
from
each
department
are
given
to
the
city
engineer
to
clear
this
project
and
then
the
final
letter
from
city
engineer
comes
to
us.
Once
we
receive
clearance
from
all
the
Departments,
then
we're
obligated
to
put
it
on
the
agenda
for
final.
So
that's
that's
what
we
have
in
our
records
to
be
able
to
put
this
on.
Finally,
so
I
just
wanted
to
update
you
on
how
the
process
went
and
how
we
how
it
was
put
on
this
agenda.
B
B
N
O
We
Analyze
This
thoroughly.
We
analyze
it
fully
to
the
max.
We
look
at
Upstream
watersheds
and
the
watersheds
that
are
within
the
development
and,
of
course,
we
make
sure
that
they
don't
release
more
than
whatever
the
pre-development
rate
is.
So
we
look
at
all
those
things
again.
These
is
under
a
certain
time
frame
that
we
do
this
and
there's
I
know.
There's
Engineers
here
present
in
this
meeting,
and
that
know
that
we
need
to
meet
those
those
deadlines.
O
N
O
O
So
we
don't
Identify
some
of
these
things
on
time
as
well,
then
they
become
part
of
the
city,
responsibility
and
maintenance
that
will
have
to
come
out
of
taxpayers
money,
and
so
we
protect
that
as
well.
That's
part
of
our
our
due
diligence,
not
only
as
a
city
engineer
but
as
a
department
as
a
whole.
O
A
O
Some
of
those
are
considered
maintenance
again
again,
these
subdivision
some
of
the
ones
that
we've
identified
because
there's
many
faces
that
have
already
been
developed
out
there,
and
some
of
these
pertain
to
to
different
faces
that
we're
trying
to
identify
again
to
make
sure
that
there's
still
no
warranty
period
or
there's
still
something
that
we
can
address.
Well,
definitely
going
to
do
that.
H
H
H
B
So
when
you
talk
about
where
the
county
and
the
city
meet
outside
City
Limits,
we
still
have
the
etj
to
work
with.
That's
still
considered
area
that
that
developers
must
abide
by
city
ordinances
when
they
do
their
development.
So
this
is
within
that,
so
so
they
would.
They
would
take
care
of
that
once
you
get
outside
the
etj,
then
that
falls
in
the
county
itself
and
we
don't.
We
don't
take
part
in
those
discussions.
H
N
Q
Q
I
guess
pulling
up
the
aerial
we
didn't.
We
did
that
right
now
as
well,
trying
to
see
get
her
bearing
straight
in
the
area,
but
it
seemed
like
a
lot
of
the
property
has
been
cleared
of
the
116
Acres
and
I
apologize,
but
I
know,
there's
been
I'm,
assuming
a
few
phases
that
have
already
come
in
I've
noticed.
Some
of
the
areas
have
already
been
built
out
and
the
question
is:
do
you
know
a
percentage
of
how
much
has
already
been
planted
and
of
of
this
master
plan?.
R
Q
R
Yeah,
it's
a
pretty
rigorous
process
and
just
to
let
the
Commissioners
know
what
we
do
on
that
we
do
a
lot
of
stuff.
You
know
it's
something
that
I
should
anticipate
that
somebody
might
want
to
take
legal
action.
You
know
we
we
don't.
We
do
more
than
what's
required
with
the
city
by
the
city,
the
the
the
release
rate
that
we're
releasing
once
a
thing
is
all
fully
designed
in
the
area
that
Mr
Vander
is
referring
to
is
less
than
what
we
would
be
allowed
to
at
the
city.
R
So
we
put
that
in
with
the
city
and
obviously
the
guys
that
know
how
to
look
at
that
the
team
at
the
city
realizes
that
we're
being
conservative.
So
it's
a
it's
a
better.
It's
easier
way
to
pass
it
through
the
city.
You
know,
if
you
try
to
shave
it
to
the
to
the
Limit,
it's
a
little
bit
more
challenging.
So
we
do
that,
but
internally
before
we
have
them
look
at
it,
we
go.
R
We
we
send
it
out
to
a
consultant
and
even
though
we're
not
obligated
to
we
get
a
second
opinion,
so
we
have
all
our
keys
crossed
and
all
our
eyes
dotted
and
the
way
something
like
this
should
play
out.
This
isn't
a
courtroom.
This
is
something
we're
trying
to
process
through
the
rules,
and
everybody
else
has
to
do
the
same
rules
and
and
our
approach
to
it
is
to
be
a
little
bit
more
conservative
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
but
Mr
down
this
course
of
action.
R
I'm
not
he's
the
attorney
I'm,
not
threatening
him
with
court
I'm
saying
that
he
would
be
very
able
to
do
that,
and
we
wouldn't
subject
ourselves
to
that
vulnerability,
we're
conservative.
We
follow
the
rules.
We
have
a
lot
of
people
that
we
deal
with
at
the
city
staff
members
that
know
we're
conservative
and
we
do
that
on
purpose.
R
R
J
R
R
So
we
have
to
detain
a
greater
amount
of
the
structure
of
the
books.
That's
what
we
did
yeah
this
property.
It
was
not
too
practical
that
one
of
the
things
we're
looking
at
is
an
afford.
It
was
the
opportunity
to
be
a
little
bit
more
conservative
in
how
we
presented
the
city,
so
this
black
line
represents
a
ponds
there.
That's
not
required
by
the
city
that
one
to
store
Waters.
That
pond
is
normal,
soil,
water
and
storm.
R
Today,
the
magenta
line
here
kind
of
purplish
represents
a
barricade
to
water,
even
our
property,
hello,
okay,
so
the
this
is
all
this
area
is
extra
and
then
this
black
line
represents
a
pond.
That's
in
this
area.
That's
also
extra.
The
magenta
line
represents
a
barricade
that
prevents
water
from
leaving
our
property,
so
it
it
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
here,
I'm,
not
saying
that
the
water
can't
inevitably
leave
our
property,
but
nothing,
that's
here
is
required.
R
So
this
little
yellow
area
here
is
a
structure
that
makes
it
really
conservative
and
these
are
the
kinds
of
things
we
put
in
front
of
our
Engineers,
our
team,
and
then
we
go
to
the
city
and
we
show
them,
and
then
they
review
all
the
calculations.
So
that's
how
we
got
here,
that's
where
we're
at
right
now
now
this
area
down
here
is
one
of
the
parties,
that's
complained
and
that
entire
area,
all
these,
all
these
yellow
lines
represent
stuff,
that's
not
coming
from
our
property,
their
tributaries,
going
to
the
main
Creek.
S
R
Blue
one,
the
yellow
ones,
are
from
other
properties.
So
you
can.
You
can
get
a
sense
how
many
things
are
feeding
into
this
now
there
there
is
something
here
that
I
think
is
concerning
to
the
people
in
the
area.
I
went
out
to
look
at
it.
Try
to
figure
out,
I
I
feel
that
something
has
changed
and
they're
talking
about
that.
R
This
dashed
line
is
different.
Now
this
dash
line
is
a
tributary,
but
it
has
a
a
road
in
it.
That's
now
been
paved
by
the
county
and
it
acts
when
the
county
paves
on
a
County
Road,
it's
not
like
in
the
city.
You
know
it
doesn't
have
all
the
drainage
infrastructure,
so
you
have
a
paved
road
going
down
through
the
this
little
creek
tributary
and
all
the
water
can
do
is
run
down
the
paved
road.
So
that
is
a
big
introduction
to
this
immediate
area.
R
This
is
one
person,
that's
impacted,
Mr,
d'andis
property
is
right
here
and
above
Mr,
deanda's
property.
There's
some
hills
that
drain
across
this
property,
which
you
know
he's
dealt
with
over
the
years
and
I,
understand
that.
But
this
area
is
a
low-lying
area
down
here
that
we're
talking
about
all
the
parties
involved
in
complaining
and
and
I
I
understand
their
concern,
but
it
is
a
low-lying
area.
It's
it's
in
the
in
the
bot.
Just
this.
R
Well,
anyway,
it
it
I
I,
do
agree
that
there's
something
different
there,
but
I
what
I?
What
I
agree?
That's
what's
different,
we've
we've
been
very
conservative
in
what
we
did
and
the
only
thing
I
see
in
the
area
that
I
could
find.
Is
this
new
paved
road
with
no
drainage
infrastructure?
So
that's
that's.
How
I'm
seeing
it.
R
H
Thank
you,
John
I
would
just
point
out
that
it's
not
a
it's,
not
the
city
who
requires
the
only
thing
the
city
requires
is
that
the
runoff
not
be
any
greater
after
the
development
or
before
it's
up
to
him
to
figure
out
how
that
gets
done.
It's
not
the
city
that
says
build,
do
a
a
reservoir
here
and
do
a
reservoir
there.
It's
up
to
him
to
do
that
and
convince
the
city
that
it
works.
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
A
What
I'll
do
is
because
for
the
limit,
let
me
just
address
the
the
audience.
So
we
have
a
limit
of
three
people
can
come
up
and
talk
now
someone
I'm
gonna,
let
anybody
else
come
if
they
have
anything
else,
different
to
say
or
different
to
show
so.
We've
had
three
people
show
already
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
give
two
more
people
to
go
ahead
and
come
up
really
quick
just
for
them
out
of
time.
U
Ing
the
record,
my
name
is
Jesse,
that's
it
right
here,
okay,
so
he
was
talking
about
what
he
was
talking
earlier
was
about
my
property.
I
haven't
even
addressed
yet
about
my
property,
but
I've
lived
in
in
Pico
Road,
since
probably
97
98,
around
97
I
didn't
live
in
this
property.
I
lived
further
up
in
Bigger
Road
and
as
a
little
kid
my
parents
have
two
acres
there
at
the
little
kid,
but
it
would
rain.
U
I
would
go
into
you
know
when
it
rained
I
would
go,
I
would
go
out,
even
though
we
only
had
two
acres
I
would
go
out
and
explore.
Probably
trespassing
I'm.
Sorry,
because
I
have
some
neighbors
there,
so
I
would
go
and
though
some
of
the
people
that
wants
to
factor
or
the
Rodriguez
Family
behind
their
property,
there
used
to
be
a
lake
I,
don't
know
how
big
it
was,
but
there
was
a
lake
there,
which
is
not
there
anymore.
U
U
A
U
U
Up
to
to
this
so
I'm,
not
an
engineer,
but
I
know
that
five
acre
four
and
a
half
acres
about
40
feet,
high
I
know
there's
there's
there's
a
difference
there,
but
that
takes
a
when
it
rains
that
would
take
a
lot
of
water
and
this
right
here,
I,
don't
know
when
this
picture
is,
but
you
get
based
on
my
property.
It
was
probably
like
in
the
dry
season
because
I
have
all
this
is
grass
and
it's
pretty
dry
there.
U
U
This
way
to
cement
canals
that
run
this
way
and
then
run
down
towards
this
area
this
area,
and
then
this
right
here
on
this
image,
you
can't
see
there's
a
natural
like
another
like
little
natural
I
guess
like
Creek
Ponder
area,
where
water
would
absorb
well
that
right
now,
I
have
some
images
that
is
they
burned
it
up.
So
water
really
couldn't
get
into
here,
and
so
all
this
water
ran
from
up
here
ran
this
way.
U
U
They
said
on
on
those
plants,
it
says
water
retention,
none
of
these
retained
any
water
at
all.
It
all
went
straight
towards
our
properties.
So
this,
even
though
this
is,
is
yellow
coming
from
this
property.
They
built
a
retention
pond
on
this
side
which
didn't
retain
any
water
and
that's
what's
affecting
Mr
Cepeda
over
here,
and
all
that
water
from
that's
captured
from
above
is
going
this
way
and.
U
U
U
U
They
see
rain
and
they
just
threw
onto
water,
and
we,
even
though
we
try
to
contain
them
or
whatever.
So
you
know
now,
but
we're
we're
fearful
for
for
our
lives.
You
know
for
for
my
kids
so
that
they
don't
understand
how
how
incredibly
dangerous
this.
Is
it
there's
another
this
one.
You
can
really
see
the
flow
of
the
water
at
the
speed
that
it's
coming
in
and
it
washed
off
my
road.
U
U
Money
to
go
to
court
against
a
big
company
like
this,
so
what
we're
asking
is
we're
asking
y'all
if,
if
y'all
could
just
I
guess
hold
on
on
it,
letting
them
perceive
until
they
fix
this
issue
me
personally,
I
don't
want
them
to
pay.
My
fences
I'm,
not
asking
for
a
recommendation
for
my
livestock
I
just
want
this
to
be
to
be
fixed
just
because
I
also
have
Team
teenage
girls
and
to
them
last
year.
U
It
was
so
easy
for
for
one
of
them
we
were
scared
after
the
fact,
because
we
didn't
know
she
with
her
vehicle,
which
is
it's
a
car.
It's
not
a
pickup
truck
like
my
truck.
Could
you
know?
Would
it
could
go
through
the
water
a
little
bit
easier
see
even
though
she
she
should
know
better?
She
still
went
through
the
water
because
it
was,
she
got
home,
it
was
late,
it
was.
It
was
night
time
she
she
wanted
to
go
home
and
she
ended
up.
U
V
Hi,
my
name
is
Rosie
Garcia
and
I
live
at
961
at
pico.
Road
we've
lived
there
for
46
years
and
we've
never
seen
flooding
like
this.
It's
been
since
the
development
of
Pinnacle
that
we've
begun
to
have
these
problems.
I
understand
that
you've,
this
you've
seen
a
lot
of
photographs.
I
won't
show
you
the
photographs
of
the
flooding
in
the
front
of
our
our
home,
our
tenants
home
our
Chicken
Coop.
V
J
W
W
H
G
Approval
procedure,
Texas
local
government
code,
212.0095
deals
with
the
situation
when
you've
had
a
preliminary
plot
conditionally
approved
and
there's
been
a
response
by
the
developer.
Section
c
of
that
says
a
municipal
Authority
or
governing
body
that
receives
a
response
under
under
Section
212.0093
shall
approve
a
previously
conditionally
approved
or
disapproved
plan
or
plot.
If
the
response
adequately
addresses
each
condition
of
the
conditional
approval
or
each
reason
for
the
disapproval.
G
A
E
H
N
I
do
want
to
clarify
like
the
scope
of
power
of
this
commission,
and
you
know
right
now.
What
we
have
in
front
of
us
is
only
unit
six,
okay,
Pinnacle
and
all
we
can
do
potentially
at
this
point
is
table
it
so
that
we
give
engineering
a
chance
from
both
city
and
county
to
review
what's
happening,
especially
because
there
are
Retention
Ponds,
but
they're,
not
effective.
So
I
think
it
would
be
a
good
idea
to
sort
of
let
engineering
take
a
look
at
what's
happening.
F
The
only
problem
that
I
have
with
that
is
that
the
city
did
their
job.
All
of
these
things
are
being
brought
up,
have
been
addressed
by
the
city
engineer.
They
wouldn't
put
their
stamp
on
it.
If
they
had
it
checked
all
this,
so
we're
just
throwing
it
just
a
time
thing:
we're
gonna,
throw
it
back
to
table
it.
They
already
did
all
that.
That's
that's
the
only
thing.
That's
the
only
problem
that
I
have.
B
F
Q
That's
why
my
first
question
was
when
we,
when
I,
asked
the
engineer
how
many,
how
much
of
this
master
plan
has
already
been
planted,
meaning
they
can
go
and
pull
permits
tomorrow
and
he
I
think
he
said
500
of
the
600
acres.
So
that's
none.
In
other
words,
unless,
like
they
mentioned
right
other
things
other
than
this
commission,
they
have
the
right
to
other
things
as
far
as
what's
happening.
But
but
those
are
that's,
probably
that's
plotted
and
ready
to
construct
on
as
soon
as
it's
sold
or
maybe.
J
B
B
B
That
is
the
the
process
that
we
go
through.
We
rely
on
the
directors
and
their
teams
to
go
through
the
process
so
that
when
it
comes
here
and-
and
you
have
a
final
and
has
no
comments
on
it,
that
means
our
departments
and
our
Engineers.
They
have
gone
through
it
and
they
deemed
it
cleared
for
final.
N
N
B
Letter
was
sent
to
us,
they
did
go
out
there
because
we
did
get
people
residents
coming
to
our
office,
so
we
passed
it
on
to
the
to
the
city
engineer.
To
look
at
the
report.
Back
to
me
was
they
physically
went
out
there.
They
checked
the
project
after
that
was
done.
Then
they
they
submitted.
The
letter
of
approval.
A
N
F
Q
H
J
Q
N
Q
J
J
B
Them
so
it
doesn't
become
the
cities
for
a
year,
and
so
the
contractor,
the
engineer
of
Records
they're
warranting
the
the
the
detention
area
and
after
the
year's
over
they'll
come
back
to
the
city
engineer
right,
he'll
review
that
project.
If
he,
if
he
does
accept
it,
then
the
city
goes
through
the
process
to
to
take
over
that
land.
O
Detention
ponds,
they're
responsible,
oh
okay,
for
commercial
and
Industrial
Development.
So
then
enforcement
comes
in.
We
make
sure
that
these
detention
pumps
are
maintained
adequately
to
perform.
What
they
were
designed
to
do
in
Code.
Enforcement
takes
action,
if
not
they'll
bring
it
up
to
our
attention
and
we'll
look
into
those
matters.
F
O
A
A
Thank
you.
Okay,
we're
moving
on
to
item
six
a
or
six
public
hearing
recommendation
of
an
organ
6A
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
map
of
the
singular
by
rezoning
lot,
two
block
one
Troutman
mni
subdivision
located
at
1303,
International
Boulevard
from
B1
limited
business
district
to
B3,
community
business
district.
J
D
You
Mr
chairman
for
the
record.
We
have
the
applicant
program,
LLC
owner
applicants
and
we
have
George
J
Albert.
As
representative
property
location.
We
have
brought
to
block
one
trotman
mni
subdivision
located
at
1303
International
Boulevard.
We
have
a
zone
change
request
from
a
B1
to
B3
proposed
uses
for
a
pet
shop
for
pet
grooming
and
bakery
we
have
letter
sent
which
were
26.
We
have
none
four
and
one
against
location
view.
A
X
X
P
Q
Q
X
And
I'll
I'll
get
to
that
in
a
minute.
It's
it's
not
too
worth
chattering.
It
may
not
be
too
outcome
determinative,
but
thank
you.
You
can
tuck
that
away
for
for
right
now,
if
you
don't
mind
I'm
kind
of
coming
back
to
the
to
the
map,
you
can
see
just
north
of
international
there's
a
car
wash
that's
used
to
be
called
to
change
the
name,
but
that
that's
also
a
B3.
X
The
just
south
of
international
is
Buffalo
Pond
and
Raul's,
barbecue
and
and
kind
of
on
Sunday.
It
kind
of
becomes
one
thing
during
the
week:
it's
another,
that's
also
a
B3
and
we're
requesting
the
zone
change
to
be
a
B3
as
well,
which
is
consistent
with
at
least
those
two
properties
right
and
I'm.
Gonna
go
ahead
and
again
I
mean
I'm.
Looking
at
the
color
coding
here.
X
X
X
That's
the
point
I'm
trying
and
if
I'm,
if
I'm
missing
something
I
mean
please
correct
me
sure,
and
then
interestingly,
staff
doesn't
support
the
proposed
zone
change
because
it
anticipates
that
you
know
anticipated
to
negatively
impact
the
traffic
in
the
area
based
on
the
more
intense
uses
surrounding
the
property
I
you
know,
I
get
you
know,
anticipates
I
mean
I'm
going
to
use
the
word
presumption,
assume
a
traffic
study
hasn't
been
conducted.
What
sort
of
empirical
data
exists
that
would
buttress
this
assumption?
X
I
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
aware
of,
and
what
I
am
aware
of-
is
that
my
client
has
had
this
property
for
sale
for
over
a
thousand
days.
It's
been
on
the
market,
a
couple
nibbles
here
and
there
the
the
purpose
of
the
letter
that
has
been
supplement
that
has
been
entered
to
supplement
this
application
is
that
we
have
a
potential
buyer
and
the
potential
buyer
would
very
much
like
to
use
this
cyclist
as
a
small
breed.
X
You
know
pet
grooming,
Locale,
you
can
look
at
the
street
view,
I
mean
we've
got
because
the
city
requires
it.
We
got
parking
Galore.
Whoever
operates
this.
This
building,
independent
of
staff's
assumption,
will
have
access
to
all
of
this
parking
and
parking
places.
I
mean
you
could
open
a
a
Taqueria
and
I'm
sure
it
would
be
an
overnight
success.
It
probably
wouldn't
be
best
in
highest
use,
but
you
would
you
could
fill
that
parking
on
it
handedly
an
argument
could
be
made.
X
You
might
not
be
able
to
fill
it
so
efficiently
with
a
simple
pet
grooming
type
of
a
business,
but
it
we
have
a
ready,
willing
and
able
buyer
and
the
purchases
contingent
upon
the
zone
change
from
the
B1
to
the
B3.
That
is
consistent
with
the
future
Land
Use
model
that's
been
presented
by
staff,
and
it's
also
consistent
with
the
adjacent
property
and
the
property
across
the
street,
in
very
respectfully
request
that
you
will
make
a
recommendation
for
the
zone,
change,
Mr.
X
Q
X
That's
right:
you
have
to
go
down
this
I.
Think
it's
a
major
collector,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
is
that
it's
the
designation
of
International
and
for
the
I
mean
we've
all
been
on
International.
We
all
know
that
this
is
definitely
a
choke
point
going
east
in
traffic
moves
rather
efficiently
on,
at
least
on
most
days
at
most
times
going
I'm
sorry
going
east
going.
J
B
I
B
Going
to
be
the
zone
and
whatever
the
items
that
could
be
done
in
that
zone
apply
right
in
this
case,
you're
talking
about
a
grooming
facility.
If
that
place
closes
something
opens
up
and
there
would
be
three
they
can
put
something
else.
We
also
look
at
it
from
perspective
of
I
know
that
car
wash
came
in
and
I
guess,
fortunately
they're
doing
very
well,
but
that
also
impacts
that
area
traffic
has
gone
out
there
and
try
to
mitigate
this.
B
The
problem
with
the
traffic
by
putting
those
yellow
markers,
we're
having
u-turns
that
are
happening
in
the
area.
It's
become
just
a
traffic
issue.
When
you
have
the
schools
that
let
out
the
northern
uid
is
on
International
all
those
cars
come
in
and
they
they
really
it's
very
congested
in
that
area.
B
I
believe
this
building
has
eight
parking
spaces
and
they're
diving
to
the
left,
so
the
radius
to
get
out
of
there
I'm
not
sure
how
it
would
be
done
because
they
would
dive
into
the
parking
space
and
then
they
would
either
they'd
come
out.
They'd
have
to
reverse,
but
at
a
different
angle,
to
get
out.
So
it's
a
very
tight
parking
parking
lot.
The
other
thing
is
were
were
fans
of
the
pet
grooming.
B
Bakery
I
mean
they,
they
are
a
successful
business,
they
do
very
well
and
it's
a
very
popular
place
and
our
thoughts
on
this
is
not
only
not
only
are
we
going
to
have.
We
have
traffic
there,
we're
gonna
bring
in
more
traffic
because
of
the
popularity
of
this
business.
It
is,
it
is
a
business
that
does
well
in
our
community.
The
problem
is
this
place
is
very
tight,
very
tight.
Q
Q
B
X
I
X
X
And
by
the
way
I
mean
traffic
generation,
I
mean
don't
we
want
businesses
in
Laredo
to
succeed?
Don't
don't
we
don't?
We
want
to
create
a
vital
vibrant
economy,
I
mean
or
do
we
want
to
be
the
city
of
no
and
I
won't
get
on
my
soapbox
with
all
the
downtown
catastrophe
that
we've
had
in
getting
things
properly.
You
know
adjusted
and
recoded
and
zoned
I
mean
this
is.
I
X
A
J
Q
Your
B1
allows
the
issue
is
like
the
pawn
shop
or
if
I
was
a
barbecue
or
whatever
it
is
in
that
corner,
they
have
access
to
McPherson
and
not
necessarily
have
them
go
into
the
neighborhood
yeah
than
International
right
here.
That's
that's.
The
only
concern
I
see
is
that
you
have
to
make
that
right
into
International
and
go
into
Oak
Ridge
and
then
weave
your
way
around
the
neighborhood
right.
You
don't
have
to
go
into
Oak
Ridge
you
can
just
you
could
just
go
about
your
way.
Right
continue
on
time,
yeah
North!
J
J
N
Think
visibility,
wise.
You
know
you
have
four
around
four
vertical
parking
spots
that
might
probably
be
staff
that
they're
going
to
be
there
all
day,
and
then
you
have
the
10
other
spots
for
visitors,
they're
going
in
and
out
I.
Don't
think
that
they're,
like
you,
know,
Crossing
each
other.
It
seems
like
there
is
visibility
for
people
to
go
in
and
out
and
and
it's
maybe
it
seems
like
a
tight
space
but
I
think
it
there's
plenty
of
space
to
you
know
come
in
and
out
from
there
and
it's
already
been
approved.
X
Would
not
sure
because
it
affects
the
marketability
of
of
the
property,
because
yet
you
know
they
are.
The
buyer
wants
to
do
this.
Pet
grooming,
type
of
a
business
and
yes,
they've-
had
some
success
and
but
who's
to
tell
right,
especially
when
looking
at
the
future
Land
Use
model,
you
know,
maybe
you
know,
being
the
kind
of
the
only
B1
in
the
bunch
May
no
longer
be
clearly
it
would
make
them
not
as
marketable
as
as
other
as
the
other
B
threes.
B
B
B
Would
be
a
plus,
you
know,
I
mean
no
problem.
A
conditional
use
permit
obviously
two
two
two
for
to
answer
some
of
the
concerns
that
we
might
have.
It
still
opens
a
business
I
understand
what
he's
saying,
but
it
it
does
open
the
business
if,
if
they
want
to
open
the
business
there,
that
would
get
them
there
and
Council
if
they
had
any
conditions.
B
If
they
wanted
to
put
just
because
they're
concerned
about
something
they
can
put
it
on
there,
then
it
can
be
reviewed
down
the
road
if
necessary,
we
could
put
a
life
on
on
the
cup
and
then
bring
it
back
and
discuss
it.
You
know
at
that
time
to
to
show
that
it's
working.
What
have
you
I
mean?
None
of
this
is
guaranteed,
because
this
is
a
city
council.
J
B
Businesses
might
not
want
to
be
there
because
these
type
of
business
don't
fit
there.
Okay,
so
going
to
a
B3,
doesn't
really
be.
It
can
stay
B1
because,
with
a
conditional
use
from
the
B1
will
take
care
of
all
the
businesses
that
would
be
interested
in
being
there
and
the
ones
that
are
B3
required,
wouldn't
necessarily
go
there,
because
they,
it
wouldn't
work
for
them.
So
if.
X
That's
right,
it
goes
up
that
way.
It
goes
up
yeah,
but
I
mean
to
be
clear,
we're
still
Bound
by
all
city
state
federal
laws,
particularly
common
law,
nuisance
laws.
You
know
we're
still.
You
know
whomever
occupies
that
property,
whether
it's
B3
or
otherwise.
You
know
still
can't
go,
make
a
big
mess
out
of
that
property
and
and
to
your
point,
sir
you're,
correct
I
mean
they
clearly.
You
know
somebody
at
some
point
in
time
cut
this
sliver
off
of
that.
X
You
know
B3
and
has
made
this
weird
rectangle
that
is
unmarketable
and
think
about
it.
A
thousand
days
on
the
market
and
one
of
the
busiest
most
hoppiness
necks
of
the
woods,
nobody,
the
only
one
foolish
enough
to
buy
it
was
my
client.
You
know
way
back
when
and
he's
he's
you
know
built
it
out,
he's
done
what
he
could
and
and
and
we
we
keep
coming
up
upon
this.
Well,
it's
not
a
B3
I.
Just
really
don't
want
it.
A
D
A
Q
B
A
Moving
on
to
item
6B
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
2022
that
0-012
Which
authorized
special
use
permit
from
any
storage,
unlocked,
4B
block
three
amending
flat
of
dnj
Alexander
commercial
subdivision
phase,
15
plus
4A
4B
4C
block
three
located
at
17
21
7121
Bartlett
Avenue.
In
order
to
amend
the
site
plan
to
reconfigure
the
storage
units
and
parking
and
amend
the
hours
of
operation.
D
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
for
the
record.
We
have
North
Bartlett,
Mini,
Storage
LLC
is
the
owner
and
we
have
Ricardo
burial
as
representative
property
location,
lot,
4B
block,
3,
mnd
plot
of
D
and
J
Alexander
commercial
subdivision
phase,
15
Lots,
4A,
4b4c
block
3,
located
7121
Bartlett
Avenue
zone
change.
Request
is
an
amendment
of
a
Specialties
permit
for
Mini
Storages
proposed
uses
of
mini
storage's
letter
sent
or
five,
and
we
have
none
for
it
and
then
against.
D
We
had
another
ordinance
of
2022-012
for
special
use
permit
and
on
February
7
2022
city
council
approved
of
a
Specialty's
permit
for
Mini
Storages,
so
the
applicant
has
requested
an
SCP
Amendment
for
the
ordinance
2022-0-12,
which
were
the
sup
for
Mini
Storages,
and
the
requested
amendments
are
as
follows:
we
have
the
site
planned,
which
was
a
total
of
400
516
units
and
five
different
buildings
are
being
proposed,
which
differs
from
the
427
units
and
seven
buildings
that
was
previously
approved.
The
parking
was
also
amended.
D
The
amended
amount
of
parking
will
be
10
parking
spaces,
including
handicap
parking
spaces,
which
differs
from
the
five
previously
approved
parking
spaces
inside
the
Gate
of
the
many
storages
that
mounded,
the
amended
amount
of
parking
spaces
will
be
20
spaces,
which
differs
from
the
19
that
were
previously
approved.
The
proposed
emitted
hours
of
operation
will
be
able
to
accommodate
24-hour
services
and
to
make
just
hours
to
be
less
on
certain
optic
days,
which
differs
from
the
previously
approved
hours
of
operation
of
6
a.m.
J
W
Q
At
the
end
of
the
day,
the
original
sup
was
the
hours
of
operation
you're
looking
at
24
hours.
Now
it
is
a
Mini
Storage
right,
so
people
sometimes
can
only
move
at
certain
times
of
the
day
here,
correct
so
and
then
at
the
additional
units
that
you
went
from
seven
buildings
to
five
buildings,
but
more
units
correct.
W
So
you
come
up
with
a
preliminary
site
plan
at
the
beginning
to
get
it
approved
and
you
get
the
sup
approved
and,
as
you
start
getting
into
engineering
and
marketing,
and
all
that
and
you're
a
year
in
now
they
say
you
know
what
we
need
to
add
more
indoor
AC
units.
We
need
to
add
more
bigger
units,
smaller
units.
So
even
though
there's
less
buildings,
the
square,
the
square
footage
is
around
the
same.
So
if
right
now
we're
under
a
building
permit
we're
constructing,
what's
been
approved
because
of
the
way
the
ordinance
is
written.
W
If
once
we
get
a
CO,
if
the
city
comes
and
says,
hey,
your
sup
didn't
match
your
new
one
that
the
city
approved.
You
know
you
can
kind
of
get
shut
down,
so
I'm,
hoping
that
there's
a
different
route
next
time,
but
it
just
creates
this
route
again
for
us
to
kind
of
like
solidify
the
the
the
new
side
plans,
a
little
yeah
and.
B
This
is
a
special
use
permit,
so
when
it
goes
to
council,
this
becomes
law,
big
Creator
and
ordinance,
so
the
exhibit
is
part
of
the
law
so
he's
he
wants
to
make
changes.
He
has
to
go
back
to
council
and
request
it
because
it
is
and
the
books
as
a
law,
and
so
that's
what
he's
doing
he's
coming
to
make
those
changes.
Thank
you
any
other
questions.
A
A
Yeah
on
the
paper,
all
right
again
motion
carries
moving
on
to
review
and
consideration
of
the
following
master
plan:
item
7A
review
and
consideration
or
revision
to
the
center
NS
subdivision
master
plan
for
the
intent
is
residential
and
Commercial.
The
purpose
of
this
revision
is
to
reconfigure
phases.
Three
four
and
five.
Z
AA
B
B
Does
this
process
start,
what
do
they
go
with
it
and
everything
so
right
now
he's
he's
proposing
this
master
plan
it's
coming
through
here
then
he'll
start
the
process
to
go
through
this,
so
that
by
the
time
it
comes
to
final,
which
could
be
from
this
point.
To
getting
final
could
be
three
years.
Yeah.
AA
Q
Q
Q
AA
Correct
right
and
we
have
one
area,
we
have
a
small
area
or
that
staff
noted
where
it's
it's,
it's
the
remainder
of
where
a
collector
turned
in
back
into
a
to
a
residential
street
at
50,
and
we
have
that
double
French.
Just
on
those
few
lots,
and
we
will
the
staff
didn't
notice
that
and
we
could
easily
rearrange
the
lots
to
solve
this
problem.
That's
why
we're
just
agreeing
with
these
comments?
The
next
time
we're
going
to
address
the
master
plan.
AA
Q
Q
So
that
that
has
to
be
designed
in
that
way,
that's
because
of
the
third
fret
plan,
yes,
but
the
current
street
that
you're
going
to
have
in
phase
three
I
would
hope
it's
it's
wide
enough,
because,
and
that
would
help
also
from
people
encouraging
people
to
try
to
get
access
off
it.
Absolutely
you
would
recognize
that
it's
a
wider
Street
and
that's
why
you're
gonna
drive.
AA
L
Q
Q
AA
J
J
J
AA
Q
Q
Y
B
A
bigger
there's,
a
bigger
massive
gun
to
this
park
and
they're,
trying
to
up
the
river,
create
a
linear
park
right
along
that
area.
We
have
bike
trails
that
are
are
leading
to
it.
So
this
is
part
of
a
huge
master
plan
that
they're
working
on,
and
here
is
the
the
planning
Parks
planner
for
the
parks
department
and
she
reviews
with
the
engineers
these
designs
and.
Q
AA
Can
see,
I
can
speak
yes,
this
this
area
right
over
here.
This
is
part
of
the
the
river
of
Vega.
This
was
dedicated
by
a
long
long
time
ago
to
the
City
of
Laredo.
The
City
of
Laredo
owns
this.
This
River
Vega
North
adjacent
to
College
Heights
and
has
owned
it
for
1990,
who
cares
yeah
yeah
and
then
the
same
will
happen
here.
It
will
be
a
continuation
of
the
River
Park,
the
river
Vega.
That's
right!
We
call
it.
Yes,
thank
you
of.
A
Q
T
Would
that
come
and
be
here
so
this
this
comment
is
actually
in
compliance
with
the
model
subdivision
rules
that
the
city
adopted
under
the
criteria
for
under
the
watermelon
board,
so
the
type
of
development.
This
is
actually
requires
that
flat
note
on
there.
So,
even
though
it's
separate
it's
actually
separate
apart
from
the
zoning,
so
it
is
required
as
a
platinum
under
the.
N
I
I
A
A
A
motion
a
second
all
in
favor
all
right
again,
motion
carries
moving
on
to
item
8C
preliminary
consideration,
the
replay
of
lot
one
block,
one
Kilim
Industrial,
Park,
Unit
16
into
lot
1A
block
one
from
Industrial,
Park,
Unit
16.
The
purpose
of
this
refund
is
to
remove
an
existing
utility
and
access
East
minimum
acreage.
Z
K
Q
K
K
I
Q
K
K
I
Z
Z
J
W
Tracks
chairman
members
of
the
commission,
Ricardo
Villarreal,
representing
the
client.
We
were
here
about
two
no
maybe
four
weeks
ago
to
discuss
this
project.
I
know
we
were
discussing
the
Tia
part
of
it.
Those
comments
stayed
on
when
my
hands
only
took
them
off
so
I
just
have
an
issue
again
with
those
I.
Don't
want
to
start
it
up
again.
I
know
not
everybody
was
here,
but
if
anybody
has
any
questions,
but
we
request
that
the
Tia
portion
of
the
traffic
comment
be
removed.
W
It
was
taken
care
of
by
planning
planning
to
put
note
number
seven
to
coordinate
with
the
traffic
director
with
any
of
the
entrances
exits
so
on
so
forth,
but
the
Tia
is
can't
do
anything
the
roads
are
there.
You
know
the
Tia
usually
gets
done
at
the
beginning
of
the
project.
Like
Wayne's
master
plan,
you
know,
so
anybody
has
any
questions
here
to
answer.
D
B
W
A
W
W
I
Q
I,
don't
know
what
I
know.
We
talked
about
last
time
about
puds
and
the
process
of
Parkland
dedication
and
how
that's
looked
at
and
I
do
highly
recommend
that
we
form
a
subcommittee.
Take
closer
look
at
it
as
far
as
how
that
works
and
funding
and
how
much
per
break,
or
especially,
the
differences
of
cost
of
land
throughout
the
city.
Q
B
That's
that's
actually
an
issue
that
well
two
things:
one
we're
looking
at
the
process
attorney
in
our
office,
but
we're
also
looking
at
the
impact
of
that
would
have
the
cash
and
who
of
right
that,
yes,
we
are
looking
at
that
because,
yes,
it's
nice,
sometimes,
but
because
we're
we're
staying
away
from
pocket
parts
right
and
then
we
go
to
to
bigger
Parks,
but
that
also
creates
some
issues
for
us.
So
we
are
looking
at
both
sides
in
them.
Thank
goodness,
we
have
a
Parks,
planner
great,
take
care
of
report
yeah
and.
Q
B
Q
A
J
A
S
Mr
chairman
for
the
record,
the
final
consideration
of
Embarcadero
phase,
two
subdivision
so
final
consideration
of
the
Plato's
lot:
6A
block
1418,
Eastern,
Division
final
consideration
of
the
read
plot
of
lots:
35
34
and
35
block
18
Santa
Rita,
subdivision
unit;
six,
eight
into
Lots,
34A
and
and
30
35a
Block,
18,
Santa,
Rita,
subdivision
unit;
6A
final
consideration
of
the
Jesus
and
Mundo
Garcia
plant
and
the
last
one
is
final
consideration
of
Lasco
plat.
As
in
italindo
subdivision.
A
B
So
hopefully
we
can
have
a
short
presentation
just
so
you
you're
aware
of
what
they
would
have
to
submit
for
a
complete
packet,
and
so
you
have
an
understanding
of
what
they
submit.
So
we'll
do
we'll
try
to
do
a
brief
presentation
for
that.
It's
just
a
generic
presentation
so
that
you
all
can
see
and.
B
I
B
B
He
has
to,
he
has
to
give
him
something
sponsor
and
they've.
There's
I
mean
there
could
be
comments
made
about
those
two
weeks,
but
we'll
go
there
and
it's
just
two
weeks.
He
has
to
turn
back
now,
the
one
that
we
were
talking
about
the
30
days
when,
when
submittals
made
for
a
final
by
state
law,
there's
a
pot
that
starts
ticking
what
we
call
that
clock.
That
starts
thinking
right.
So
if
we
have
30
days
to
take
action
on
that
item,.
B
What
I
like
to
do,
maybe
if
commissioner
Raquel
and
commissioner
Baron
maybe
we
can
get
together
and
kind
of
go
over
the
scope
of
what
we
what
we
want
to
try
to
accomplish
and
that
way
we
can
bring
it
back
here
to
present
and
then
add
it
and
then
officially
make
the
workshop.
So
at
least
we
have
okay,
okay,
all
right.
So
at
least
we
get.
D
N
B
And
then
they
have
to
submit
a
letter.
The
One-Stop
shop
runs
under
the
engineering
department.
So
all
those
departments
submit
their
letters
to
engineering
engineering
was
the
last
letter
that
that
approval
before
it
comes
to
us
all.
The
Departments
do
look
at
at
these
items
and
they
submit
to
the
engineer.
Y
Parking
spaces:
you
need
one
tree
and
it's
just
an
overarching.
It
doesn't
specify
it's
supposed
to
be
a
car.
It's
supposed
to
be
a
trailer,
but
I
really
feel
after
just
hearing
what
they
have
to
say
about
the
trees.
That
really
should
be
enforcing
even
the
trailers
to
have
the
trees
like
even
intense
spaces,
because
they
do
take
a
significant
amount
of
space
and
it
has
environmental
impact.
So
right
now
we're
only
enforcing
it
with
cars,
but
we
should
think
about
it.
For
trailers.