►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Workshop 052919
Description
Planning and Zoning Workshop 052919
B
A
Right,
the
next
election,
according
to
the
City
Development
Co
chapter
24,
for
an
article
5
for
the
purpose
of
amending
the
mission,
dimensional
standards,
setback
requirements
and
other
matters
instead,
there
too,
with
that
being
said,
I
will
now
open
it
up
and
they
have
victory.
That
is
presentation.
B
C
B
Want
to
apologize
a
week,
we
are
having
network
issues
that
we're
really
limited
on
on
internet
and
even
a
capability
of
bringing
some
items,
and
so
we
tried
our
best
but
we're
using
our
personal
cell
phones
to
kind
of
navigate
the
web.
And
so
it's
it's.
It's
a
weird
situation.
The
only
thing
from
from
the
items
requested
just
to
summarize
I'm
gonna
work
it
backwards
or
I,
know
mr.
Bose
I
don't
help
me
kind
of
provide
a
some
feedback.
You're
gonna
see
an
email
from
Dina
Castile.
B
Yes,
that's
pretty
much
some
feedback
or
some
commentary
or
slash
research
that
that
Nathan
through
ghanima
Casteel
provided
in
regards
to
some
setbacks,
and
so
we
had
to
be
at
least
wanted
to
provide
that
email
just
for
reference
at
the
very
end
of
that
email
of
that
packet
of
that
staple
package,
you'll
see
a
survey
at
the
very
end.
That
survey
was
kind
of
provided
with
the
agenda
for
reference
to
digest
in
the
earlier
process.
The
purpose
of
this
survey
is
one
of
the
goals.
B
B
What
we
wanted
to
do
with
these
questions
was,
if
you
guys
feel
comfortable
if
we
need
to
edit,
add
delete
or
anything
that
makes
you
feel
comfortable
or
that's
missing
and
like
that,
we
do
have
an
IV
that
these
are
public
information
officer,
Pio
and
pretty
much
he'll
be
helping
us
when
it
comes
to
either
some
ironically
posting
on
the
website
or
using
social
media.
We
do
have
like
Facebook
or
such,
where
we
can
try
to
post
this
and
try
to
get
a
survey
perception
and
for
sure.
At
the
other
component
of
you
survey.
B
B
Pretty
much
if
anything,
gentleman
I
just
started
with
finish
with
an
email
that
has
the
cutting
a
custard
on
top.
But
that's
just
some
communication
from
our
former
planning
director
and
I
was
just
talking
about
the
survey
attached
at
the
very
end
of
that
package
and
M
for
Mature
co
was
presented
publicly.
E
D
B
Thank
you
and
so
pretty
much.
We
have
these
questions
and
we'll
run
through
them
in
a
second,
the
other
components
that
you've
seen
your
package.
You
do
have
an
array
of
setback,
charts
and
summaries
of
different
municipalities.
The
only
one
that's
not
included
years
from
the
city
of
Boston,
because
City
of
Austin
has
a
separate,
a
white
of
booklet
or
such,
but
what
we
do
have
let.
A
B
And
just
in
case
what
I
did
into
it
at
the
very
front
is
pretty
much
a
summary
of
these
different
municipalities.
Of
course,
the
very
first
one
is
the
raid.
Oh,
we
did
get
some
feedback
from
Austin
Corpus
Christi
in
that
video,
San,
Antonio
and
and
ten
twenties
just
a
long
list
of
zones,
and
so
it's
just
continue
to
look
to
the
bottom
and
so
pretty
much
the
attachment
you
might
not
need
him
too.
B
I
don't
know
if
I
mentioned
this
in
the
beginning,
we
did
not
provide
any
agami
maps.
What
we
did
notice
is
a
lot
of
these
ones.
These
have
a
large
data
file
when
it
comes
to
cedar
Lorado.
To
be
honest,
we're
we're
a
little
bit.
She
blows
it's
easier
to
print
out
and
it's
easy
to
observe
the
entire
city
with
no
issue
with
the
color
schemes
and
seeing
the
zone
patterns
as
a
good
example.
B
F
A
I'm
going
through
the
chart
that
you
gave
us
excellent
work.
Thank
you.
I've,
noticing
that
a
lot
of
these
cities,
where
they
have
reduced
setbacks,
like
rear
setback,
seem
to
be
like
10,
but
yet
they're
not
area
is
like
10,000
there's
no
22,000
90,000
McAllen
has
a
5,600
square
foot
for
duplexes
and
with
a
heavy
10-foot
rear
setback.
A
San
Antonio-
and
this
must
be
what
you're
talking
about
the
inner
city
they
have.
What
was
it
are
two
single-family
residential.
It's
a
2,000
square
foot
locked
with
a
5-foot
where's,
then
put
fronted
five
foot
rear.
However,
they
have
a
qualifier
on
this
date,
where
you
can
only
build
on
50%
of
the.
A
Although
it's
like,
because
the
setback
situation
is
becomes
irrelevant
because
you
move
up
or
down
based
that
setback,
because
they're
already
read
using
your
footprint,
so
it's
not
like
you
can
build.
You
know
the
whole
lot
area,
okay,
which
was
one
of
the
things
that
you
know
I
say
well,
you
know
I
mean
a
lot
of
the
stuff
that
worked,
but
you
got
to
have
a
maximum
available
area
that
you
below
and.
B
D
G
D
A
B
Some
something
to
kind
of
just
do
another,
my
last
two
cents
on
it
another
article
that
I
wouldn't
I,
was
unable
to
print
out.
There
was
an
article
from
the
architects
from
it's
the
AIA
Association
and
it
was
I
think
the
article
was
back
in
2016
or
such
that
they
were
pretty
much
thinking.
That
California
was
looking
into
a
begging
zones
to
have
laser
setbacks.
But
when
you
read
the
article,
it
focused
a
lot
of
like
on
inner-city
areas,
and
so
it
almost
seemed
like
it
focused
as
urban
zone.
A
I
can
understand
you
know
in
those
areas
their
problem
is
availability
of
land.
Everything
is
very,
very
expensive,
so
I
could
see
where
you
know
trying
to
maximize
that.
Little
piece
of
property
that
you
buy
I
think
with
the
average
price
in
San
Francisco
for
housing
is
somewhere
close
to
a
million
bucks
in
a
no
and
that's
average,
and
then
you
move
to
LA,
and
it's
in
its
you
know
the
congestion
is
is
just
the
same,
so
it
wouldn't
be
fair
for
us
to
use
a
standard
from
Calif
to
Texas.
H
Part
name
is
Joe
on
the
Austin
thing.
Unless
I
misunderstood
you
all,
because
this
this
will
end
in
how
how
did
how
we're
always?
What
do
you
call
it?
You
know
the
run
off.
You
know
we're
pushing
water
into
the
streets
all
the
time.
So,
if
you
put
a
building
the
five
six
foot,
setback
to
the
building
itself
obviously
is
impervious
coverage
way.
The
Austin
one
I,
don't
believe
it's
40%.
Building
than
25%
more
at
45
I
believe,
is
what
they're
saying
you
can't
have
more
than
40
percent
total
impervious
cover.
H
B
B
The
runoff
is
one
because
it's
literally
there's
nothing
impervious
and
so
having
that
same
concept,
one
of
just
as
a
concern
that
we
wanted
to
present
to
council,
whatever
they
decide
to
do
or
not
to
do
that.
If,
for
some
reason
they
want
increase
the
density.
Our
our
next
recommendation
to
the
TR
B
was
to
analyze
the
per
capita
water
each
stored,
because
in
generally
we
are
increasing
density
and
also
the
runoff
coefficient
discussion.
You
just
mentioned,
and.
A
B
A
good
example
is
I,
won't
mention
the
subdivision,
but
there's
a
it's
an
one
of
the
latest
subdivisions
that
they
had
a
lot
of
businesses
on
was
business.
One
of
the
things
that
business
does
allow
is
multifamily,
and
so
what
was
happening
with
that
subdivision
that
commercial
subdivision
was,
since
the
commercial.
B
A
little
bit
low,
the
multifamily
window,
residential
wind
swell
also,
and
so
pretty
much
all
these
beat
ones
beaches.
You
know
they
start
making
apartment
complexes
that
the
subdivision
itself
choked
on
its
own
water
and
sewer
capacity,
and
so
that's
a
great
example
of
pretty
much
changing
the
years,
and
so
that
was
kind
of
a
concern
where
we
had
some
existing
subdivisions
that
were
already
engineered
and
we're
changing
it
to
a
higher
density
might
be.
Maybe
one
one
or
two
persons
per
capita
might
not
be
much
if
there
was
a
study
to
analyze
it.
E
E
I
actually
contacted
some
of
the
residents
in
math
in
district
1,
and
they
all
they
want
to
do.
They
want
to
be
allowed
to
use
some
of
the
data
of
the
setbacks
to
increase
either
their
living
quarters
for
for
a
family
member,
maybe
I,
palapa
or
something
that
they
can
enjoy.
But
as
far
as
how
did
the
city
develop
with
five
feet,
setbacks
there's
a
lot
of
problems.
One
of
them
is
that
when,
when
you
have
the
finished
floor,
elevation
I
think
the
ordinance
calls
for
anything
about
8
inches.
E
So
if
you
were
to
have
a
disability
vampire,
it's
a
it's
one
feet
one
foot
as
money's
preferred
on
the
on
the
slope.
So
how
can
you
make
a
map
from
the
the
from
the
rear
door
is
just
in
the
distance?
I
did
an
evaluation
myself
and
we
actually
need
12t.
That
would
be
a
perfect
sit
back
see.
Why?
Because
we're
gonna
have
eight
feet
that
are
gonna,
be
able
to
scope
and
then
we're
gonna
have
a
mandatory,
see
the.
D
A
E
So
if
they
call
five
feet
and
they
decided
that
in
order
to
create
the
proper
living
conditions,
they
would
actually
have
to
be
from
here
to
here
twelve
feet
so
that
way
that
this
would
be
a
walk
five
feet
in
that
century,
but
we
still
have.
We
are
allowing
a
value
for
the
enjoyment
risen.
So
if
we
don't
find
it
right
here,
then
a
rear
door.
Anybody
included
to
the
side
to
the
rear
he
will
not.
Work
is
actually.
E
A
Today's
for
this
to
the
property
it
might
be
to
the
wall,
because
here's
the
thing
he's
talking
about
when
you
do
a
block
fans,
if
anything
on
where
you
sit,
if
I
send
it
on
my
property,
I
just
lost
that
dimension
right
most
of
the
time
they're
either
on
one
line
or
the
other.
Seldom
are
they
happen
have
so
when
you
lose
that
you
know
that's
what
he's
talking
about
your
new
scene
in
ages,
you're
losing
eight
inches,
because
you're
going
up
guillotine
go
up
to
the
wall
this
whole,
the
other.
A
He's
talking
about
in
construction,
let's
assume
you
had
a
five
foot
setback
in
the
rear
and
you
build
up
to
it.
It
has
to
be
totally
masonite.
You
can't
use
wood
or
necessity,
because
wood,
you
need
seven
feet
in
between
the
property.
That
means
you
need
seven
and
seven.
You
need
14
feet,
so
fire
doesn't
jump
if
you're.
I
A
E
Well,
we
have
reigned
either.
We
need
to
provide
a
between
the
dots,
because
otherwise
Oh
the
roof
will
not
be
able.
Ten
feet
will
not
be
able
to
hold
the
world
actually
the
water
what's
gonna
happen
is
that
we
have
the
building,
and
then
we
have
the
fans,
the
water
coming
in
here
and
the
water
coming
in
here.
This
is
the
eight
inches.
H
A
Now
I
mean
no
and
that's
that's.
The
thing
that
Viktor
touched
on
is
weekly
when,
when
they
designed
something
they
designed
them,
they
took
into
consideration
infinity
usage
of
water,
so
they
took
impervious
cover,
you
know
rooftops
and
they
they
want
to
incised
everything
based
on
certain
parameters
now
to
go
back
inside
of
a
sudden.
A
Well
we're
changing
the
parameter
and
we
got
a
whole
lot
more
roof
and
we
got
a
lot
more
water,
that's
going
to
fall
somewhere,
but
it
can't
be
absorbed
because
there's
no
ground,
so
it's
gonna
float
and
the
detention
area
that
we
made
was
already
sized.
So
I
got
more
water
going
into
a
detention
here
at
ten
a
flood,
because
those
are
things
that
nobody
has
really
discussed.
Hooker
brought
it
up,
he's
an
engineer,
so
he
knows
a
lot
of
these
issues
and-
and
you
know
it's
it's
kind
of
he'll
concede.
A
A
Well,
but
the
problem
is
you
know?
How
do
you
do
that?
You
know
I
mean,
is
five
feet
well,
five
feet?
Obviously,
I,
don't
think
this
is
a
proper.
You
know,
setback
that
would
work,
I
mean
it's
like
I
told
them,
I.
Think
one
of
the
last
meetings
that
said
well,
I've
got
five
feet
and
I
wanted
to
do
so
gotten
this
island,
which
everybody
does
the
smokes
gonna
blow
it
to
the
guys
window,
makes
four
yeah
or
if
I
got
a
dog
and
he's
barking
all
night,
my
daddy's
right
there.
A
A
Think
the
council
member,
who
was
kind
of
looking
at
trying
to
do
some
things
for
his
area,
was
saying:
hey.
You
know
my
constituents
are
asking
me:
can
we
add
that
additional
bedroom
into
that
rear
setback
and
I
think
some
of
this
they've
got
construed
and
the
TRB
probably
got
this
idea
and
said?
Well?
G
A
Neighborhood
decided
that
there's
200
willings
in
there
and
now
those
two
hundred
dwellings
one
hundred
decided
to
go
ahead
and
add
to
the
max.
Well
now
you
got
a
lot
of
runoff
coming
on,
because
now
you
got
more
rooftops,
you
may
have
and
any
time
you
add,
usually
they're
at
there's
an
addition
of
a
bathroom
which
is
in
another
fixture
or
two
and
when
you
start
having
fixtures
that
were
designed
for
the
size
of
lines
well,
now
you're
gonna
have
it
all
pressures
when
you
start
adding
additional
sewage
into
the
sewer
line
that
wasn't
designing.
A
D
I
I
And
I
think
that
you
know
the
city
is
given
policy
direction.
Obviously,
not
all
of
the
ordinances
have
been
updated
to
fully
execute.
What
that
comp
plan
is
going
to
do
and
I
understand
that,
but
I
think
that
that
would
be
another
reason
why
we
would
be
there.
Wait
because
you
know
we
don't
want
to.
I
We
don't
want
to
approve
something
that
you
know
may
be
out
of
step
with
what
the
planning
you
know
Department
and
the
complan
vision
is,
can
see
you
know,
and
maybe
there's
going
to
be
places
where
there's
gonna
be
a
need
for
a
five
say,
a
five
foot
setback
on
the
fun
in
the
end.
Maybe
it's
gonna,
be
because
there
is
a
specific
plan
for
that
development
that,
where
that
makes
sense,
as
they
have
taken
all.
A
That's
exactly
you
know,
for
some
of
these
things
kind
of
have
to
fall.
Like
you
said,
the
comp
plan
yeah,
you
know
lots
of
different
types
of
development.
You
know,
but
if
it's
new
development,
you're
engineering
for
it,
the
other
thing
that
has
to
be
thought
of
here
is
even
if,
let's
assume
that
we
did
or
that
in
the
future,
something
went
forth.
With
these
reduced
setbacks,
you
now
need
to
figure
out
we're.
Gonna
put.
This
am
I
going
to
put
next
an
r1.
A
K
K
J
A
Now
it's
already
boys,
it's
it's
already
I'm,
sorry
out
of
the
20
half
of
it
needs
to
be
ahead
of
it,
no
because
ap
mandated
that
they
want
to
Tim
feet
when
the
ordinance
was
written.
When
we
wrote
that
ordinance
up,
because
I
wrote
that
we
did
five
feet
for
utilities
in
the
very
front,
then
8pq
minutes
is
what
I
want
it,
because
I
want
mine,
transformer
boxes
and
another
five
feet
back.
So
nobody
wants
it
to
and
then
I
guess
over
the
last
six
years,
I
got
some
time,
but
it's
tame
right
now,
I.
I
Think
that
you
want
to
do
something
like
like
I
mean
obviously
we're
not
City
Council,
but
you
know
it
just
would
seem
to
me
like
you're
gonna
do
an
exception
to
the
rule,
because
it's
gonna
provide
some
other
value.
You
know,
there's
gonna
be
some
other
reason
other
than
just
you
know.
The
city
policy
can't
be
that
to
residents
in
South
Laredo
district,
one
want
to
add
an
extra
bedroom
to
the
house.
So
now
we're
going
to
change
the
entire
policy
for
the
entire
city
that
just
can't
be
well.
A
I
A
Know
I
handed
interject
something
in
here
because
I
love.
What
you're
saying
is
this
cost-benefit
ratio
hasn't
been
established,
okay
I
mean,
like
I,
said.
If
we
do
X
number
of
rooftops
and
it
wasn't
engineered
for
that
well
now
you
got
a
problem
with
water
and
sewer
and
drainage.
No,
the
taxpayer
has
to
say
hey
guys.
I
gotta
upgrade
all
this
stuff
now
so
the
cost-benefit
ratio.
Somebody
needs
to
run
numbers
on
across
benefits.
C
L
L
D
L
The
better
it
is
and
in
your
packets
right
before
that,
and
so
what
we
are
going
to
propose
is
also
propose
a
survey
to
put
out
whether
we
have
Twitter
I,
don't
know
Facebook
or
something
for
the
citizen
and
broadcast
it
out
and
bring
you
back
actual
feedback
of
what
citizens
want.
Now
we
provided
80
and.
L
B
In
case
to
transform
the
hype
component,
the
the
very
last
row
and
some
other
municipalities
have
it
for
the
city
of
Laredo.
It
does
identify
the
max
height
for
her
zone
and
so,
for
instance,
r1
allows
two
and
a
Half.
Dome
are
one
a
two
stories
and
two
stories:
it's
when
I
have
my
most
few
minutes.
The
Attic.
B
When
you
do
your
watersheds
and
and
such
you
use
that
that
total
to
advise
where
that
source
is
going,
and
so
when
you
have
an
area
pretty
much
with
the
zone,
it
has
a
different
that
density
or
usage
and
so
multi-family
wouldn't
be
compared
to
to
residential,
and
so
the
only
caution
that
will
be
given
to
the
developers
just
the
limits,
knowing
the
limits
of
of
your
zones
and
such.
And
if
you
want
to
be
more
conservative
than
you
know,
you
do
a
multi-family.
You
know
like
that.
A
If
you
were
in
the
private
sector,
you
design
a
single-family
residential,
you
know
subdivision
when
that
design
was
done,
was
the
sizing
of
the
water
and
the
sewer
did
it
have?
Was
it
maxed
to
just
X
number
of
units
in
that
subdivision
like
single-family,
or
was
there
like?
Well
there's
ten
percent
capacity,
for
somebody
wants
to
add
up
pretty.
B
There's
there's
also
like
safety
factors
like
a
to
be
honest,
I
think
I'm
for
definite
safety
factor
my
neck.
Remember
it's
1.5
or
2.5.
That
axe
gives
that
little
buffer
pedal.
To
be
honest,
that
that's
more
of
you
know,
we
ever
have
a
like
a
jam
in
the
in
the
system
so
that
that's
what
that
extra
and.
A
The
reason
I
was
asking
that
is
because
of
what
I
would
mentioned
here
a
little
bit
about.
Well
people
already
build
it
up.
You
know
so
I
said:
okay,
we're
adding
fixtures
to
it,
so
the
lines
do
have
a
little
bit
of
capacity
when
you
add
up,
but
not
that
if
everyone
has
something
visual
were
to
add
up
nobody
with
what
you
doing
is
you're,
saying:
hey
less
than
10%
of
the
subdivisions
that
are
a
divisional
fixtures.
B
D
I
Think,
first
of
all,
I
think
that
makes
a
good
point
which
I
can't
believe
I
just
said
that
well
but
his
point.
Yes,
point
still
doesn't
address
what
you
are
saying,
which
is
you
know
what
about
fire
safety
hazards
on
the
set
box,
because
that
Clemente
is
now
you're
closer
to
the
neighbor's
property
than
you
were
before?
What
about
noise?
I
C
I
But
this
is
a
little
bit
comparing
apples
to
oranges.
I
haven't
fully
pop
they'd
get
through,
but
I
want
to
throw
out
them
when
the
city
decides
to
put
a
stop
sign
in
an
intersection.
I
would
imagine
it's
because
there's
data
on
the
traffic
flow
and
then
when
they
decide
to
put
a
stop
sign
a
set
of
stop
sign
these
decide
to
put
a
light
is
because
of
the
traffic
flow
like.
In
other
words,
there
is
objective
data
if
that
is
going
to
determine
whether
this
should
be
no
stop
sign,
stop
sign
red
light.
I
I
don't
feel
like
we
have
objective
data
of
like
this
is
why
this
is
right
like
this
is
why
we
should
do
it
and
I
think
that
I'm
happy
to
get
public
input.
I
absolutely
couldn't.
Let's
do
the
survey.
Maybe
we
do
need
to
do
the
survey,
but
these
are
not
experts.
These
are
not
people
who
are
gonna
know
that
you,
if
you
asked
me
whether
we
should
have
a
light
at
Bartlett
and
wherever
I'm.
I
M
I
D
I
Complan
says
we
want
to:
we
want
to
develop
residential
in
downtown.
Ok,
what
are
the
obstacles
to
developing
the
residential
X
Y
&
Z?
Okay?
What
can
we
do
to
fix
x
y&z?
The
city
can
do
this
in
this,
but
that's
it.
The
other
thing
we
can't
fix
it,
but
here
are
proposed
ordinances
here:
studies
that
we've
done
that
lead
to
the
development
of
downtown.
We
need
a.
We
need
this
to
be
tied
to
the
comp
plan.
We
need
this
to
be
tied
to
like
a
real.
G
I
B
I
wrong,
though
the
one
component
that
I
just
want
to
add
is
that
there's
a
we
did,
hire
Abel
City
to
update
the
land
development
code,
and
so
one
of
the
component
when
it
comes
to
professionalism
in
cities.
From
from
our
part,
we
won't
be
able
to
give
you
that
data
like
I'll,
be
straight
up
or
pretty
much
building
civil,
so
engineers,
and
we
don't
really
we're
not.
B
We
don't
have
that
capability,
but
we
did
hire
this
consultant
to
pretty
much
look
into
the
land
of
Emeco,
which
portion
includes
the
setbacks
so
from
their
part,
one
of
their
duties
from
their
items
to
do
is
one
that
also
verified
with
the
comp
plan
and
I'm
also
even
verified
many
components,
including
that
there's
only
so
when
it
comes
so
professional,
it
would
be
actually
able
city
whenever
that
they're
already
under
contract
with
us
to
do
to
do
those
at
that
research.
So
they
would
be
able
to
be
provide
that
feedback
all
right.
Let.
B
E
Then
an
engineer
would
be
higher,
so
they
cannot,
they
can
actually
create.
It
could
flow
with
a
five
foot.
Setback
I
can
answer
about
the
20
feet.
We
have
the
log
right
here
and
we've
got
20
foot
setback
right
here,
so
we
have
the
house.
This
is
this
is
the
residence.
So
this
is
what
happens
is
when
you
have
all
the
rain.
This
area
would
actually
take
when
we
have
the
back
section
right
here.
We
got
25
minimum,
so
this
will
will
absorb
a
lot
of
the
work
so.
E
E
H
H
The
engineering,
the
physics
of
it
all
you
know
about
why
it's
a
bad
idea
to
retrofit
or
to
pass
this
on
existing
subdivisions.
So
I,
don't
know
my
TRB
would
have
I
mean
you
all
know
these
things
to
right.
Some
of
you
all
must
know
these
things
that
these
two
gentlemen
are
telling
us
about.
Especially
you
know.
I've
talked
about
runoff
all
the
time
at
every
meeting
that
we
dug
in
overthinking
it
that's
permeable.
Is
there
a
nut
farm
as
a
service
to
absorb
it?
But
so
why?
B
H
This
tree
or
about
flooding
and
let
them
blame
the
city.
So
if
you
do
a
survey
and
you're
pure
democracy,
but
a
survey
out
there,
every
was
gonna
say
then
what
50
percent
of
their
water
rate
back
or
whatever,
and
it
can't
be
done-
that's
why
I
think
the
service
fine,
but
it's
gonna,
make
its
goodness.
You
just
gonna,
put
more
pressure
on
councilman
to
make
a
bad
decision.
H
Well,
yes,
it's
ready
that
if
somebody
we
would
have
to
last
meeting
all
that
property
down
by
worms
are
over
150
acres
and
200
acres
and
done
you
know
what
prevent
this
area.
I
mean
I,
don't
know
what's
out
there
yet
if
somebody
wants
to
do
a
master
plan
like
that
and
they
do
your
mister
masses,
runoff
coefficient
study
and
the
these
drainage
issues
are
solved
and
fire.
What's
that,
what's
that
material?
H
That's
right!
Well,
that's
got
to
be
a
better
all
want
to
do
it.
You
do
it
over
here
where
it's
right,
where
we
can
engineer
it
all
and
you
off
to
pay
for
this
and
you
advertise,
and
then
they
show
you
the
master
planner,
but
here's
the
buffer.
Here's!
How
it
looks
so,
then
you
all
help,
decide
and
guide
it
into
it
mean
the
transition
from
r1
to
whatever
the
element.
A
L
Is
the
reason
why
staff
said
yes
on
the
carpet
Pervis,
it's
already
concrete
we're
just
adding
that
blue
foam
cover
so
you're,
not
adding
to
the
runoff
on
cardboard,
you're,
not
adding
to
the
water
and
sewer
impact,
because
it's
not
livable,
that's
the
reason
staff
said
yeah,
we
agree
with
a
setback.
Maybe
50%
of
the
setback
is
maybe
because
we're
getting
a
lot
of
people
coming
back
and
saying,
take
it
at
the
cardboard.
That's
why.
L
I
The
side
for
a
second
okay
just
go
back
to
this
one
issue:
why
don't
we
recommend
this?
Why
don't
recommend
that
that
there
be
a
study
of
what
you
would
need
to
do
in
order
to
have
these
setbacks
and
and
and
and
have
the
City
Council
outline
like
if
you
want
these
types
of
setback,
so
these
are
all
like
kind
of
what
he
was
saying
like.
I
These
are
all
the
things
that
you
have
to
have
in
order
to
be
able
to
do
this
and
see
what
that
would
look
like,
and
then
maybe
we
can
pass
something
like
that.
Like
here's
an
exception
to
the
ordinance
like
here,
you
can
do
this
five
foot
setbacks,
but
you
have
to
do
all
these
other
things
too,
because
right
now,
as
we
stand,
you
know
and
why
do
I
say
that
why
do
I
say
that?
Because
again,
maybe
the
compliant
has
an
idea
for
housing
that
has
shorter
setbacks.
I
To
say,
no,
no
set
five
foot
setback
that
but
I
also
think
it's
premature
to
say,
yeah,
we're,
gonna,
lose
well
I.
Think
it's
impossible
to
I,
it's
an
absolute
no
on
how
what
there
goes
in
that
road
and
I
think
that
we
let
people
cities
come
back
and
say
when
you
do
a
five
foot
setback.
This
is
what
you
have
to
have.
This
is
when
this
is
the
only
condition
of
nowhere
to
work.
I
A
Nobody
talking
about
a
new
community-
yes
you're,
not
talking
about
this
proposal
that
right
now
the
wait
stands
is
they
want
to
go
citywide
with
it.
Yeah
you're,
talking
about
an
area
that
is
gonna,
be
a
new
area
designated
and
it's
gonna
be
engineered
for
these
kind
of
things,
which
makes
sense.
That
is
the
appropriate
way
to
go.
We
like.
E
I
G
I
Do
something
that
where
this
would
make
sense
right,
I'm
just
saying
this
would
make
sense.
You
would
want
to
be
able
to
give
that
leeway
to
be
able
to
do
that,
but
again,
I
think
that
ties
back
table
city,
something
it
ties
back
to
the
conflict.
You
know
you
can
do
these
different
setbacks,
but
when
it
ties
to
specific
housing
criteria
in
the
in
the
in
the
compound
and
some
some
guidelines
on
when
it
works
and
when
it
doesn't
okay
well,.
A
A
You
know
if
you're
looking
at
the
whole
city
right
now,
I
know
what
you're
telling
me
you're
saying:
hey.
Well,
there
might
be
areas
of
parts
of
the
old
downtown
we
develop,
I
get
it.
So
how
do
we
chant
or
how
do
we
present
that
and
say
there
might
be
reason
to
see
that
that
this
might
work.
But
how
do
we
do.
I
H
H
G
B
Pretty
pretty
much
is
adjusting
going
so
to
what
you're
saying
is
we
can
try
to
make
contact
with
with
Abel
City.
They
do
have
like
I,
said
to
evaluate
the
whole
Bil'in
Club,
which
includes
the
setbacks.
What
we
can
try
to
do,
they
do
have
allocated
to
do
interaction
with
the
public.
I
think
this
is
a
good.
A
A
What
I'm
talking
about
is
taking
the
existing
comp
plan
right
now,
okay
and
and
the
idea
that
you
have
that
was:
oh
okay,
there
might
be
some
redevelopment
areas,
there
are
old
neighborhoods
hundred
years
or
whatever
I'm
gonna
call
them.
Then
we
may
want
to
take
a
picture
of
them.
Look
at
it's!
Okay,
bye!
A
M
A
I
B
Things
that
like
I,
mentioned
at
the
meeting
when
it
comes
to
Austin
and
San
Antonio,
the.
If
you
see
they're
just
just
looking
at
the
amount
of
common
man,
they
broke
it
into
3d.
There
is
Mountain
em.
You
look
at
Austin.
You
know
this
were
footage
of
the
lot
area.
You
know
you
go
from
40
when
an
acre,
20,
2015
10,
thousands
mm
4500,
that's
Corpus
Christi
actually,
but
when
it
comes
to
Austin
they
have
3606
1050,
10,000
and
then
San
Antonio.
B
F
B
G
G
J
J
J
Up
front,
but
you
still
have
room
in
the
back,
and
so
it's
not
the
same.
It's
not
they're,
not
they're,
completely
different,
and
so
the
riddles
are
unique
in
that
sense
that
it's
one
of
the
few
cities
in
all
these
cities
that
doesn't
have
a
leeway
for
everybody
Baptist
to
each
other
and
the
other
set
backs
up.
That
gives
you
some
sort
of
privacy
and
and
of
course,
when
we're
teaming
a
big
issue
with
everywhere
we're
going.
Is
that
we're
dealing
with
terrain
as
we
expand
out
that
have
it's
more
mountainous?
J
You
have
a
lot
more
operators,
you're
going
to
deal
with
bigger
overflow
and
people,
don't
realize
there
don't
pay
attention
to
the
width
but
Johnny.
A
commission
of
I
said
about
what
we're
having
rain
issues.
Laredo
doesn't
rain
report.
This
does
what
this
range
for
all
day
at
a
slow,
constant
rate.
Rado
rains
hard
for
about
an
hour
like
it's
almost
every
time
it
rains
here.
It's
a
flash
of
blood
event
yeah
and
if
we
make
the
problem
worse
by
putting
minimizes
the
surface
and
I
think
that
most
has
a
good
idea.
J
There's
certain
areas
that
already
have
storm
sewers
and
it's
really
only
one
it's
downtown.
We
do
everything
else.
Nobody
else
does
that
people
in
the
new
neighborhoods
they
have
like
a
drainage,
ditch
and
it's
just
a
hole
in
the
ground.
Nobody
has
underground
storm
sewers.
So
it's
a
lot
bigger
than
just
willy-nilly
coming
up
with
five
feet.
J
I
B
I
think
from
from
the
feedback
I
know,
we
just
presented
this
this
road
information
on
the
survey
we
do,
we
don't
have
to
do
it
it's
up
to
you.
We
just
presented
that
just
to
see
if
we
get
some
feedback
or
some
data,
but
the
other
component
I
think
because
of
the
questions
and
concerns
that
we
have
we
will.
We
can
find
a
main
concept
with
Abelson.
B
You
set
up
a
date
row
because
I
think
what
we
all
knew
that
was
gonna
be
another
another
workshop
and
I
think
maybe
having
their
profession,
expertise,
kind
of
see
what
their
approaches
they
might
maybe
give
some
peace
of
mind.
This
is
where
we're
trying
to
we're
trying
to
do
and
have
them
kind
of
right
at
assessing
I,
don't
think
they'll
have
the
final
I
think
answer.
Could
I
at
least
describe
the
approach
that
they're
trying
to
do.
A
A
I
I
want
this
to
be
a
workshop
and
I
think
that
what
we
need
to
have
in
that
workshop
as
well
with
either
cities,
is
what
is
going
to
be
the
what?
What?
What
are
obstacles
that
we
currently
face
in
that
complex
I
will
do
other
cities
implement
the
comp
plan?
We
need
to
know
that,
because
again
you
know
we
get.
We
don't
like,
like
none.
I
On
the
planet,
maybe
you
are
planet,
we're
not
planners.
You
know
it's
like.
We
need
guidance
on
how
this
thing
works
and
what
why
isn't
it
completely
you've
been
working
what's
next
and
what
are
they
doing
to
the
power
the
Commission,
but
also
developers
and
in
the
community,
to
implement
this
compliment
so
I
think
that
should
be
covered
in
that
as
well.
Somebody
some
topic
about
I,
agree.
I
F
I
B
B
I
Can
I
say
something:
I'm
good,
I'm,
glad
that
teri
brought
this
and
I'm
gonna.
Tell
you
why?
Because
if
this
hadn't
come,
then
we
wouldn't
be
having
this
workshop
on
these
points
on
how
we
analyze
these
types
of
issues
on
the
setbacks
and
how
we
analyze
the
issues
of
implementing
that
compliment.
So
the
this
thing
that
I
think
has
been
ill-conceived
is
actually
a
good
thing.
It's
a
blessing
in
disguise.
A
C
A
H
A
B
A
H
L
F
B
Pretty
much
the
property
line,
that's
the
20
foot
setback,
no,
that's
the
robot
where
we
live
together.
Typically
it's
from
the
back
up
to
the
property
line.
So
if
you're
talking
to
the
sidewalk,
you
know
and
you're
moving
forward,
which
is
five
and
a
half
well
let
the
setback
was
20.
And
then
there
you
have
your
that's.
B
But
this
is
your
building,
so
the
carport,
if
this
is
your
property
line,
is
pretty
much
to
this
limit,
so
you
still
have
five
and
a
half
feet
from
this
to
the
sidewalk.
This
belongs
to
the
city,
typically
on
this
five
and
a
half
feet
or
in
this
segment.
That's
where
you'll
find
your
water,
that's
part
of
the
easement
and
then
when
it
comes
to
the
front
front
lot,
easements
you'll
find
it
in
the
ten
feet
within
the
20
foot,
setback.
I
A
You
got
a
car
tree
or
pickup
build
ten
feet.
I
have
my
vehicle,
that's
not
covered
yeah,
that's
the
fire
and
it
goes
back
many
many
years
where
people
would
say:
hey
man
I
just
want
to
make
sure
my
car's
under
the
carport,
so
it
doesn't
get
super
hot,
oven,
hams,
yeah,
I,
work
at
Hales.
Well,
the
way
it
was
written
or
the
wage
rate
right
now
you
only
allowed
10
feet
so
have
your
vehicle's
sticking.
A
D
C
B
That's
not
a
reason
for
making
a
decision
just
the
case.
One
of
the
reasons
I
want
to
kind
of
talk
with
mr.,
yet
are
the
same
when
it
comes
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
One
of
the
many
cases
that
there
is
it
has
to
do
with
with
the
front
with
the
cardboard,
the
other
one
I
don't
have
a
staff,
but
just
just
be
indeed
the
acting
building,
the
rectory
and
I'm,
pretty
sure,
miss
being
so
handsome
we've
gotten
many
customers
that
or
citizens
or
such
that
they
want
that
car,
poignant,
I'm.
B
A
D
A
A
H
B
E
E
B
Close
and
so
when
he
comes
for
accessories,
if
you
want
to
go
up
a
lot,
then
such
it's
really
flexible
to
be
honest,
it's
winning
when
it
comes
to
the
enclosure
that
gets
pretty
sensitive
and
so
the
rear
setback
you
cannot
be
born
on
the
friend.
You
cannot
be
warm
and
so
the
reason
we're
being
open
with
the
carport,
because
it's
an
open.
A
H
B
D
A
A
I
A
B
A
car
but
we're
gonna
ask
for
you
to
sit
back
now
into
to
reach.
To
summarize
really
quick.
If
you
would
get
to
the
city
well,
the
chart,
I,
guess
I'm,
seeing
it
right
there,
though
I
mean
if
you
would
get
that
chart
pretty
much.
The
only
change
you
would
see
is
for
the
notation
from
the
very
bottom
being
specific
that
for
the
open
structure
on
the
front
line,
you
wouldn't
see.