►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 040921
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 040921
A
A
Okay,
all
right!
Okay,
can
we
have
something
to
excuse
the
commissioners
that
are
not
present?
I
know
dominguez
and
duane
is
in
that.
D
A
A
Is
the
city
going
to
invest
some
money
in
in
the
internet
to
get
you
guys
better
technology
downtown.
A
A
A
Signify
by
saying
aye,
with
none
heard,
motion
carried
minutes
approved.
The
next
item
is
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
ordinances
letter
a
5a
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
of
laredo
by
authorizing
the
issues
of
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
bar
in
condos
9,
10,
11
12
only
and
a
lot
one
two
block
one
kimberly
plaza
subdivision
located:
4820
mcpherson
road.
A
C
Sir,
yes,
you
saw
this
last
time.
It
was
tabled
I'll,
ask
miss
guerra
to
give
the
presentation
again
briefly
and
then
we'll
give
you
some
opportunity
for
discussion
at
the
end
of
that.
F
Good
morning,
vanessa
guerra
for
the
record,
the
applicant
is
juan
el
garza,
the
that's
the
property
owner
david
god
says
the
applicant,
and
miguel
gomez
is
the
representative.
As
stated
the
the
property
is
located
in
condo
units,
9,
10,
11
12.
on
lots,
one
and
two
block
one
kimberly
plaza
located
at
4820
mcpherson
road.
The
request
is
from
v3
to
a
cup
for
a
bar
microbrewery,
including
a
food
truck
court.
F
The
future
land
use
map
designate
this
as
neighborhood
mix,
use
and
staff
supports
the
proposed
cep.
It
meets
the
location
requirements
that
it
be
located
along
principal
arterial.
Mcpherson
is
designated
a
major
arterial,
it's
again
not
anticipated
to
negatively
affect
their
surrounding
area
all
again,
although
not
in
conformance
with
the
comp
plan's
neighborhood
mixed
use,
designation,
it
complements
the
other
commercial
uses
in
the
area,
although
it
does
not
meet
the
distance
requirements
from
other
our
districts
and
while
parking
doesn't
conform
to
the
code,
the
existing
and
proposed
uses
hours
of
operation
don't
overlap.
F
Therefore,
peak
parking
levels
are
not
expected
to
spill
over
the
print
shop
and
beauty.
Salon
are
only
open
during
daytime,
and
the
microbrewery
is
proposing
to
open
after
five
parking
on
site
will
require
62
spaces.
Six
26
are
available.
Therefore,
36
are
needed.
F
There
was
a
request
to
do
a
quick
analysis
of
the
adjoining
site,
the
that
site
required
36
spaces
plus
six
stacking
spaces
for
the
drive
through
spaces
available
were
the
36
faces,
plus
the
queuing
for
the
drive
through.
Therefore,
they
had
five
spaces
over
conditions
are
typical
and
located
in
the
staff
report.
Ms.
F
Absolutely
the
the
conditions
include:
a
prohibition
against
outside
outdoor
live,
music
is
prohibited.
Outdoor
ambient
music
will
be
allowed,
but
must
be
imperceptible
on
any
adjoining
property.
There
shall
be
no
ground
vibrations
created
or
sustained,
which
are
perceptible
on
any
adjoining
property.
Okay,.
C
F
That's
the
language
that
that
is
focused
on
on
the
noise
issue.
A
Okay,
I
have
a
couple
of
questions.
First
of
all,
I
have
a
question
on
what
is
the
spacing
distance
between
the
zones,
residential
zones
and
the
zones?
It
doesn't
meet
the
300
foot
requirement.
So
what
is
what
is
the
station
requirement
right
now.
F
The
I
measured
it
and
from
the
front
door
to
that
are
those
apartments
to
the
west.
It
was
about
35
feet.
F
C
F
C
True,
but
while
th
this
is
not
a
b4
zone,
this
is
a
a
cup
to
do
one
of
the
uses
in
the
b4
and
just
to
just
so
you
know
the
you
know
there
are
requirements
for
bars,
but
those
are
taken,
as
you
said,
door-to-door
with
the
the
using
the
sidewalks.
So
as
a
person
can
walk,
not
not
just
as
the
crow
flies
to
residential
districts.
That's
true
and
that's
why
we
wanted
to
make
sure
the
conditions
of
this
spoke
to
the
noise.
The
possible
noise
complaints
that
could
come.
D
E
This
is
ogalde.
Can
I
comment.
E
Yeah,
so
a
follow-up
to
larry's
concern,
that's
not
within
our
purview
right.
Those
state,
alcoholics,
tabc
and
they'll
they'll
they'll
take
care
of
that.
So
that's
really
relevant
to
our
decision,
making
that's
correct.
Okay!
Thank
you.
A
I
think
those
things
should
go
hand
in
hand
just
to
facilitate
conducting
business.
You
don't
need
people
to
make
investments
and
then
find
out.
Well
guess
what
you
didn't
pass
the
state
requirement.
E
C
And
I'll
just
add
that
the
the
main
use
here
is
for
a
micro
brewery.
You
know,
there's
not
a
ton
of
space
in
that
for
additional,
which
is
why
they
want
to
use
the
outdoor
space,
and
so
I
can't
speak
to
I
mean
the
applicant
is
here
they
can
speak
to
that.
But
what
we're
approving
here
is
not
just
the
ability
for
someone
to
drink
there,
but
also
the
ability
for
them
to
produce
with
the
microbrewery
that
we're
considering.
C
A
H
I
do
have
a
question,
mr
chairman.
The
site
plan
only
mentions
a
couple
of
suites,
but
it's
really
not
labeled.
So
I
wanted
to
ask
staff
is
if,
instead
of
writing
the
different
suites
in
the
cop,
if
they
can
just
specify
the
square
footage.
F
H
H
That
the
site
plan
has
the
square
footage,
not
the
sweet,
so
I
was
just
confused.
I
know
that
sometimes
property
owners
can
expand,
so
I
will
feel
more
comfortable
if
we
could
specify
like
the
square
footage
instead
of
the
sweet
numbers.
F
Yeah,
it
has
mr
corn,
suarez
obregons
and
the
drive
through.
F
No,
the
the
spaces
all
together
for
the
appraisal
district
is
66
120
square
feet
for
restaurants,
it's
one
for
every
200
square
feet,
so
that
requires
31
spaces.
The
drive-thru
requires
six
stacking
spaces,
so
they
have
36
spaces,
so
they
have
a
five
spaces
beyond
what
they.
What.
C
C
I'll.
Add
to
that.
With
one
caveat
when
I
feel
like
the
parking
is
going
to
spill
over
and
affect
residential
neighborhoods.
That's
where
I
say:
okay,
maybe
we
have
a
concern.
Well,
when
it's
just
commercial
between
commercial,
you
know,
you
know.
Our
recommendation
is
not
that
we
don't
care,
but
that
we
it's
not
to
me
as
serious
a
concern.
D
C
G
One
of
the
the
support
letters
that
we
received
is
from
the
owner
of
suarez,
which
is
the
next
door
neighbor
that
we're
all
talking
about.
So
just
wanted
to
mention
that
we
have
a
letter
from
them
encouraging
the
approval
of
this
cup,
and
they
would
like
to
be
actually
one
of
the
foot
trucks
to
be
serving
on
on
location.
F
Yes,
it
was,
it
was
from
the
surrounding
area
was
an
email
and
she
mentions
that
she's
she
doesn't
support
it,
so
she
is
definitely
very
much.
A
I
I
G
I
I
F
No,
the
the
hours
are
limited
from
until
midnight.
E
This
is
uganda
when
a
motion
to
approve
the
conditional
use
permit.
A
A
B
The
applicant
garrett
fort
huber,
the
engineer
record
civil
engineering
consultants,
approximately
91
acres,
located
east
of
u.s,
highway,
83,
south
and
north
of
silito
lindo
boulevard.
The
zoning
for
this
476
law
development
is
r1mh,
b1
and
b3.
The
proposed
uses
residential
mobile
homes
and
the
commercial
general
location
aerial
view
street
view.
A
I
want
to
see,
if
he's
in
agreement
with
what
is
being
proposed.
J
Yes,
by
the
way,
this
is
hi
marcia
and
jeff
wig
with
simon
journey
consultants,
we're
here
on
behalf
of
our
client.
We
just
we
concur
all
the
comments
we
just
wanted
to
respond
to
a
couple
of
them
regarding
hearts
and
leisure.
The
comment
from
from
from
the
parks
department,
we
already
spoke
to
the
to
the
parks
department
and
we're
considering
doing
a
and
do
so.
J
There's
already
been
that
communication
with
them,
and
we
would
also
like
to
respond
to
the
traffic
safety
comment
number
three
to
add
a
collector
that
connects
from
us
83
to
palermo,
we're
in
the
process
of
obtaining
a
tia
which
would
address
the
need
for
this
collector.
J
C
C
Obsidian
boulevard
is
a
major
collector,
I
believe,
and
then
let's
see
dan
mckay.
Are
you
here
on
that.
K
Kirby,
if
I
can
just
say
something,
I
think
I
can
pierce
thing
up.
I
I
met
with
jeff
quigg
the
developer.
K
We
we
agreed
that
that
they
will
do
the
tia
and
the
the
master
plan
will
be
modified
according
to
what
the
tia
shows,
whether
we
have
enough
egress
ingress
for
the
property.
So
I
have
confidence,
so
we
can
work
that
out.
I
D
A
A
A
B
Yes,
mr
chairman,
the
applicant
is
emma
commercial
investments
llc.
The
engineer
record
is
premier
engineering
surveying
approximately
three
and
a
half
acres
located
southwest
corner
of
del
mar
and
john
v
alexander
parkway,
the
zoning.
Through
this
one
law,
development
is
b1
and
the
commercial
and
the
proposals
is
commercial,
retail,
general
location,
aerial
view
street
view.
L
Good
afternoon
eduardo
gutierrez
with
premier
engineering
for
the
record,
we
concur
with
the
staff
comments.
We
just
like
to
add
on
comment
number
one
from
planning
in
regards
to
the
pipeline.
The
gas
pipeline.
L
B
Yes,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record,
the
applicant
is
cesario
arpores,
solo,
devil
and
partners.
The
engineer
of
record
is
for
resonance
engineering.
Approximately
seven
and
three
quarter
acre
track
located
west
of
us,
83
and
south
of
don
camilo
boulevard.
The
zoning
for
the
six
lot
development
is
r1a
and
the
proposed
use
is
residential,
general
location,
aerial
view
street
view.
M
Yes,
sir,
mr
chairman,
this
is
wayne
at
portland
engineering
yeah.
Yes,
sir,
we
agree
with
all
the
comments.
However,
we
want
to
note
on
the
parks
and
leisure
that
this
this
subdivision
satisfied
its
park
requirements
many
presidents
ago,
but
we'll
work
with
the
parks
department
during
the
one-stop
shop
to
clarify
that.
But,
apart
from
that,
yes,
we
agree
with
all
the
comments.
A
A
Welcome
to
approve,
and
a
second
by
rally,
all
those
who
are
not
in
favor
of
the
motion
signify
by
saying
aye,
with
none
heard
motion
approved.
Thank
you
next
item.
Preliminary
consideration
of
the
replay
of
lot
1
block
10
crown
rating
stage,
one
into
lots,
one
a
and
one
b
crown
block
ten
crown
rate
phase,
one,
the
intended
commercial.
B
General
overview
for
the
the
applicant
is
t
walker
holdings,
llc
engineer
of
record
due
right
engineering,
approximately
0.79
acres
located
south
of
shiloh
drive
and
west
of
livingston
drive
the
zoning
for
this
two
lot.
Development
is
b3
and
the
proposed
use
is
commercial,
general
location,
aerial
view
street
view.
A
A
A
E
A
C
Yes,
sir,
just
wanted
to
say
I
apologize
and
thank
you
for
your
patience
and
understanding
with
the
technical
difficulties
we
had
at
our
last
meeting.
It's
why
we're
holding
the
special
meeting
today
at
noon?
We'll
have
another
planning
commission
meeting
next
thursday
at
the
normal
time
and
for
now
we're
continuing
to
meet
virtually.
C
We
will
wait
to
hear
from
city
council
as
to
when
we
can
meet
again
and
together
and
invite
the
public
back
in
I,
although
there
is
some
direction
been
given
that
committees
can
meet
in
in
public
that
they
can
meet
again
following
social
distancing
and
mask
wearing
that
we
haven't
been
given
that
direction
to
invite
the
public
back
in
and
as
a
committee
that
requires
the
public
we're
going
to.
My
recommendation
would
be
to
wait
till
we
can
do
it
100
in
public,
inviting
the
public
back
into
the
the
council
meeting
room.
C
If
you
see
it
now,
it's
set
up
for
virtual
meetings
and
it
takes
quite
a
bit
of
staff
to
do
what
they
do
and
with
the
way
it's
set
up
in
the
council
chambers.
So
a
little
bit
more
patience,
we're
almost
there
and
as
soon
as
we
are
I'll
I'll,
keep
everybody
alerted
and
and
send
emails
to
the
and
be
in
communication
with
the
chairman
as
to
when
we
can
start
meeting
in
person
again
and
when
what
his
determination
will
be
ultimately
making
that
call.
C
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
your
service.
You
don't
get
paid
for
your
time
on
the
planning,
commission
or
the
time
outside
of
this
meeting,
that
you
prepare
for
it,
and
we
do
appreciate
it
very
much
as
staff
the
service
you
give
to
your
city.
Thank
you
very
much
and
have
a
great
weekend
and
we'll
see
you
next
thursday
motion
to
return.