►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 100319
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 100319
A
C
Can
we
have
a
roll
call
please?
Yes,
mr.
chairman
and
Ozma,
yet
again
present
Jose
things
published
Luis
President,
George,
McClellan
resident
photo
eldest
present
Joanie
in
advance,
President
Abraham
Luka
present
Jose
Luis
Royo
president
in
this
prison,
but
the
record
mr.
Sherman,
you
do
have
form
Thank.
B
B
D
B
A
motion
to
approve
the
minutes.
We
have
a
motion.
Do
we
have
a
second
two?
Second
and
a
second
all
those
in
favor
aye
or
should
carries?
Thank
you
extended
that
we
have
is
a
preliminary
consideration
of
the
Repat
of
lot
7
block
to
last
Lomas
industrial
park
phase
2
into
lot
7a
7b,
7c,
7d
block
to
less
Lomas
industrial
park
face
to
the
antennas
industrial.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
the
Planning
Department
from
engineering
and
a
notice
to
developer.
B
F
Sir
mr.
chairman,
members
of
the
Commission,
my
name
is
Edward,
got
some
here
on
behalf
of
the
developer.
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
just
give
you
a
little
background
and
location.
Just
to
give
you
a
better
perspective.
This
is
an
existing
plat.
My
client
has
purchased
located
off
of
highway
59
east
of
the
landfill
site
of
the
current,
similar
in
landfill
and
they're
planning,
to
just
do
to
subdivide
one
one
lot
into
four
Lots,
it's
pretty
large
with
a
lot
that
was
planned
several
years
back
and
we're
in
the
preliminary
plat
phase.
F
Right
now
we
have
to
view
the
comments.
We've
already
also
have
have
had
some
discussion
with
our
city
traffic
director.
Regarding
the
comment
and
the
plan,
there's
also
a
planning
comment
regarding
shared
access.
We
are
in
agreement
to
it.
We
will
have
to
be
removing
an
existing
driveway
as
a
part
of
this
plot
and
we've
spoken
to
our
clients
and
their
an
agreement
to
that.
So
this
is
our.
This
will
be
our
basic
our
basis
for
design
for
driveways
for
shared
access
at
this
location.
This
is.
F
F
B
Do
we
have
a
second
and
a
second
all
those
in
favor,
aye
I
was
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you
next
time.
I
know
we
have
his
preliminary
consideration
of
the
Repat
of
Lots,
four
five
and
six
block
1087
Eastern
Division,
situated
in
the
city
of
Laredo,
a
Spurs,
the
original
map
of
the
city
recorded
in
volume,
5,
page
1,
Webb,
County
map
records
and
23,
proving
one
five
feet
of
unplanted
portion
west
of
lock,
4
block
1087
into
lot
six,
a
block,
1087
Eastern
Division,
they
tennis
commercial.
B
The
site
is
a
point:
seven
three
eight
acre
tract
and
it
is
located
south
of
Wella,
Lupe,
Street
and
north
of
Chihuahua,
Street
and
west
of
North
urban
there's
only
four.
This
one,
not
development,
is
b3
and
the
track
is
located
in
district
3.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
for
planning
from
traffic
and
notice
to
developer.
Yes,
sir
good
evening,
mr.
chairman,
for
you
going
to
sell
me
a
second,
let
the
record
reflect
that
Commissioner
days
is
just
joined.
Us
I,
apologize
for
being
late
had
a
full
right.
Thank.
G
B
G
Parcel
that
is
correct.
There
is
I
guess
recently,
we've
the
the
client
is
in
the
process
of
probably
doing
some
reconfiguring
in
that
it
for
the
actual
car
wash
our
client
and
with
what
we're
doing
with
planning
now
is
we're
having
to
combine
in
order
to
apply
for
a
building
permit.
We
need
it
exist
on
one
lot
if
it's
play
yeah.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
All
right,
thank
you.
Thank
you
all
right.
What
are
the
wishes
of
the
Commission
I'm
looking
to
move
item
6b
with
the
test
comment?
I
have
motion:
do
we
have
a
second
a
second
all,
those
in
favor?
Those
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you
like
I
said
I'm.
Do
we
have
as
a
preliminary
consideration
of
the
International
plat
the
antennas
commercial?
This
is
at
one
point
three
one
acre
tract
and
is
located
north
of
International
Boulevard
in
east
to
Springfield.
Avenue
was
only
for
this.
One
lakh
development
is
v3.
The
track
is
in
district
6.
B
B
B
D
I
B
B
Have
a
motion
and
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Alright.
The
next
item
that
we
have
his
preliminary
reconsideration
of
the
plaintiff
Sunday
see
the
North
East
La
Paz
subdivision
the
antennas
residential.
This
is
a
forty
three
point:
zero
five
acre
tract
located
north
of
Athena,
Boulevard
and
east
of
International
Boulevard,
there's
only
for
the
140
one.
A
lot
development
is
our
one
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comment
from
Planning
from
fire
from
water
utilities
in
an
Ursa
developer.
Yes,
sir.
J
B
I
have
some
questions
for
you.
I've
noticed
that
a
lot
of
the
earth
there
is
no
kapag
Rafi
map
on
this.
You
guys
didn't
send
us
of
topography.
So
it's
really
hard
for
us
to
figure
out
you're
draining
a
lot
of
your
lost
career,
a
lot
you're
using
a
lot
of
utilities.
Mister
drainage!
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
what
is
your
elevations
from
front
to
back
on
an
average.
B
A
B
Saw
the
East
Bay
there's
a
40-foot
easement,
yes
right
next
to
the
40-foot
Eastman,
there's
a
lot:
28:
okay
and
there's
an
unbuildable
label
on
that.
If
you
see
that
and
I'm
gonna
make
the
assumption
that
he's
talking
about
that's,
why
I
wanted
clarity
on
that?
Is
that
not
28
that
we're
talking
about
it?.
B
They
goes
right
by
it.
It
goes
right
by
it,
so
it
is
a
lot
is
another
buildable
lot.
Is
that
what
you're
telling
us?
Yes
because
of
its
size?
Yes,
okay,
alright
and
then
you
can't
tell
us
much
about
the
drainage
I'm,
not
certain.
There
will
be
the
engineer.
I'm.
Sorry,
okay!
Well,
this
is
preliminary,
but
there
is
a
lot
of
we're
a
lot
brain
age
and
it's
going
out
and
let
me
ask
staff
a
question
in
real
quick.
We
now
allow
rear
our
brain.
It's
can't
go
into
utility
easements.
Is
that
correct?
I.
B
Okay,
that
was
this.
It
might
have
changed
since
I'm,
since
I've
gone
from
I've
been
out
six
years
but
I
know
in
the
past
we
were
very
cautious
about
trying
to
separate
them
as
much
as
possible,
but
question
this
is
preliminary.
Is
this
a
question
on
my
part
because
a
lot
of
your
stuff
is
draining
into
utility
easements
and
it's
coming
back
out?
You
know,
but
it's
all
labeled
utility,
easements
I,
guess
the
other
question
that
I
have
for
you
now
based
on
I,
think
there's
only
one
lot
that
I
saw
out
there.
B
J
K
K
I
can't
really
tell
what
SIA
the
setback
there
is
there
a
special
reason
why
and
and
if
this
will
be
noted
on
the
on
the
plan,
because
whoever
buys
that
property
needs
to
know
that
the
reason
why
the
the
building's
head
back
it's
so
so
so
extends
on
the
back
so
beige
towards
the
back,
and
it's
oh
okay,
and
it
seems
that
that's
where
the
water
is
gonna
flow
and
up
and
I
don't
have
a
problem.
Mr.
K
J
B
J
B
I'm
going
to
make
a
recommendation,
you
take
back
to
your
engineer
that
we
really
need
to
have
an
engineer
who
can
answer
some
of
these
questions,
for
the
Commission
I
mean
the
Commission
members
here
right
now,
I
mean
they.
We
may
just
be
in
agreement
at
table
this.
There
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
issues
here
that
you
can't
give
us
answers
to
I.
Guess.
E
B
D
I'm
just
going
to
stop
here,
I've
respect
everything
that
you
said
because
these
things
I
don't
know
about
yet,
but
you
all
have
taken
note
of
that.
Mr.
Schneider,
the
concerns
that
the
Chairman
and
mr.
Domingos
brought
up.
We
have
so
we
can
have
those
explained
when
it
comes
back
at
the
second
phase,
to
your
all,
satisfaction,
okay
and
then.
E
B
Because
I
mean
and
the
other
thing
is
and
I
don't
remember-
I
might
have
been
in
there,
but
well
you
when
you're
draining
to
the
rear.
Are
you
all
good?
Well,
you
probably
are
going
to
be
able
to
answer
it,
but
I.
Imagine
your
engineer,
based
on
your
cues
of
the
water
coming
off
of
each
slot
is
going
to
design
if
their
Spence's
in
the
back
that
are
going
to
be
built
the
size
of
the
openings
that
are
required
to
be
able
to
drain
this
thing.
Each
lot
yeah.
K
B
B
Your
lot
lines
are:
gonna
have
water
going
from
a
long
line
to
longlining
over
one
lot.
So
there's
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
really
need
a
lot
of
and
I
know
that
the
comment
is
on
there,
that
you
cannot
alter
the
finished
grades,
which
is
an
excellent
comment,
because
you
really
can't
don't
you
get
a
final
plan
but
I've
seen
it
done
in
the
past.
Look
it's
just
a
matter
of
enforcement.
That's
what
it
is.
Yes,
sir,
can
we
add.
M
M
K
Of
the
other
there
they
have
some
notes
on
the
plat
mr.
shermin,
where
they're
they're,
asking
for
any
any
of
the
other
defenses
that
they
they
have
enough
space
to
to
do,
get
the
flow
of
the
water
to
move
from
one
log
to
the
other.
Oh
they're,
not
they're.
Actually,
given
that,
but
also
they're
telling
the
that
they
can't
change
the
elevations,
so
I
think
if
they
they
will
not
be
able
to
change
the
elevation
and
they
have
not
calculated
in
the
water
flow,
then
they
need
to
work.
K
B
And
you
see
that's
hard
for
us
to
say,
because,
since
we
don't
have
an
elevation
that
that
old
that
overlays
this
one,
it's
going
to
be
very
hard
for
us
to
determine.
That
was
the
first
thing
that
came
to
my
mind
when
you're
going
to
build
a
house,
you
know
what
is
the
elevation
that
we
got
are
we're
gonna
have
fill
in
certain
sizes
and
what
is
going
to
be
the
height
of
the
actual
pad.
Those
are
things
that
came
to
my
mind.
Also
so
yeah.
K
B
K
E
A
E
B
Does
it
differ?
No,
no,
no
I
know
that
it's
do
something
so
we're
bringing
up
right
now,
I'm
bringing
them
up,
because
there's
a
lot
of
rear
lot.
Drainage,
okay
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
miss
those
things
so
and
that's
why
I'm
bringing
up
these
questions?
That's
why
a
lot
of
us
are
bringing
up
these
questions.
We
have
a
commissioner
just
made
a
motion
right
now
and
I
need
a
suggestion.
E
Valid
concerns,
but
they
will
be
reviewed
at
the
proper
time
there.
It's
not
part
of
the
preliminary
view
process
to
review
it.
Now
now,
you've
highlighted
it,
although
it's
something
we
would
move
are
typically
highlighting
it,
you
know,
puts
a
magnifying
glass
on
that's
good
for
us
to
know.
I,
don't
think
you
need
to
include
an
additional
motion.
Anything
additional
well
will
their.
B
Well,
we
need
to
see
that
in
the
final
black
notes
that
all
these
concerns
that
we
talked
about
have
been
repressed
because
we're
not
but
usually
by
the
time
you
get
the
final.
All
we
get
is
a
final
plat.
You
know
you've
already
done
your
your
work
on
it.
Instead
we
don't
get
the
poverties,
we
don't
get
nothing.
So
it's
just
a
matter
if
it's
done
it
complied
and
goes
through,
but
I
think
we
would
like
to
see.
I
would.
M
Yes,
sir
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
subjects
of
the
following
comments
with
an
additional
planning.
Note
number:
four:
oh
wait.
Number
five
right
moved
on,
okay
that
they
bring
this
back
to
us,
either
the
next
meeting
or
as
soon
as
possible,
with
the
typography,
with
the
items
we've
requested
and
with
the
engineer
who
can
answer
the
questions
because
we'd
like
to
see
it
before
it
gets
for.
M
D
B
B
Come
back,
it
is
go
forward,
but
tonight
all
right
y'all
get
that
motion
put
on
that
understand
it.
Yes,
sir
all
right.
Thank
you
all
right.
The
next
time
we
have
a
preliminary
reconsideration
of
the
plat
of
India
Chad
industrial
park
phase
two,
the
antennas
industrial.
This
is
a
hundred
thirty
five
point:
nine
one
acre
tract
located
south
of
Beltway
park
and
west
of
interstate
35,
there's
only
four.
This
15
lakh
development
is
m1.
N
Good
afternoon
miss
chairman
Wayne
Nance,
porous
engineering
good
afternoon.
We
we
agree
with
all
these
comments.
I
was
surprised
to
see,
identify
flood
wait,
but,
after
speaking
with
the
environmental
department,
he
determined
that
I
think
it's
more
along
the
lines
of
flood
plain
and
we'll
be
working
out.
What's
a
flood
plain
administrator
during
a
one-stop
shop
process?
Okay,
so
we
agree
with
the
comments.
Thank
you
any.
B
L
Didn't
want
to
bring
up
a
topic
that
it's
kind
of
recurring
thing
I,
think
we're
kind
of
in
somebody's
doing
this
backwards.
So
good
platinum,
number,
seven
talks
about
that
it'll
be
subject
to
access
from
the
tix
Department
reputation.
I
no
longer
work
there,
but
it
does
cause
situations
where
we
approve
a
plat
that
doesn't
have
enough
room
for
possible
acceleration
lanes
and
there's
a
very
bad
grade
coming
out
of
that,
I
think
that
needs
to
be
worked
out
before
we
even
proceed
with
the
plenary
plaque
because
it
could
affect.
K
L
It
really
is
a
comment
for
all
these
types
of
plants
that
there's
a
note
there,
but
once
you
approve
a
plat
and
then
you
take
that
pledge
of
text
thought
it
kind
of
hems
in
things
in
this,
because
it's
already
so
either
you're
told
that,
but
can
go
back
and
replant
it
or
we
work
with
what
we
got
so
I
think
that
needs
to
be
worked
up
beforehand.
Let.
N
B
Right
any
other
questions
from
the
Commission:
they
have
not
one
of
the
wishes
of
the
Commission
will
to
approve
item
7b
with
the
attached
comments
motion
in
a
second
to
all
those
in
favor
aye.
Those
inst
motion
carries.
Thank
you
all
right.
The
next
item
we
have
is
preliminary
and
final
consideration
of
bulldog,
Boulevard
and
maiella
Drive
right
away.
Dedication
plaque
the
antennas
city
right
away.
This
is
a
three
point.
Four
five
acre
tract
located
south
of
Elmore
Boulevard
in
West
and
public
loop
and
the
proposed
action
is
approval.
O
B
B
The
next
item
is
the
final
consideration
of
the
plat
of
Lomas
thereto,
subdivision
unit,
nine,
the
antennas
residential,
the
10.24
acre,
tracts
located
south
of
ones
road
when
Hitler's,
Road
and
North
of
Loma
zetsu
Boulevard.
This
only
for
this
is
67
lakh
development
is
our
one.
A
the
proposed
action
is
approval.
M
B
The
next
segment
we
have
is
a
final
consideration
of
the
plan
of
loss,
presidentÃs
east
subdivision
phase
one.
This
is
nineteen
point.
Five,
seven,
five,
seven
acre
tract
located
at
east
of
poplar
enters
road
and
south
of
the
Moscow
Drive
proposed
action
is
approval
with
a
notice
of
developer.
What
does
this
coordinate?
The
street
name?
Will
the
planning
from
staff
to
ensure
that
there
are
no
similar,
sounding
or
similar
spells
names?
We'll
wait
a
minute?
This
is
a
final
black.
A
P
B
The
name,
the
comet
that
that
is
there
tell
me
you
ok
letter
I
mean
it's
a
final
plan.
So
it's
like.
Okay,
do
we
have
the
I
mean
final
plan
you
gotta?
Have
you
know
we
should
have
already
deciphered
that
yeah.
You
know
we
just
can't
go
and
say:
okay,
let's
deciphered!
Now
it's
got
to
be
decided
before
you
go,
find
it
I.
P
B
P
E
P
E
B
Q
P
P
P
Used
by
the
city
of
the
radio,
okay,
I
think
we
went
through
and
I
know
we
went
through
numerous
times.
We
usually
do
is
send
the
names
to
planning
to
kind
of
get
an
agreement.
I
think
when
we
input
this
name
on
there
with
an
X,
it
doesn't
come
out,
but
it
was
just
a
miscommunication
that
there's
another
name.
That
sounds
exactly
the
same
way:
just
felt
differently.
Yeah
one
of
those
one
of
those
words.
K
K
B
B
B
To
approve
9c
second,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
aye
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries
the
next
item
that
we
have
is
the
final
consideration:
utility
trainer
Platt,
the
antennas
industrial
is
a
10.5
acre
tract
located
north
of
Muller,
Boulevard
and
west
of
fm14.
72
is
a
one
lot:
development
in
the
zone
there
one
the
proposed
action
is
approval.
I
do
have
a
witness
card.
Mister
memo
Castro,
who
would
like
to
speak
to
this
item.
R
And
we
have
come
here
before
you,
gentlemen,
to
address
our
concerns
and
you
have
addressed
them
well,
we
have
met
with
the
Commissioner
major
city,
councilman
George
I'll
get
mr.
Kirby
here,
I'm
the
last
time
that
we
met,
and
we
were
talking
about
land,
swaps
and
stuff,
like
that.
It
bears
no
fruit,
the
district
itself
and
I
have
it
from
Superintendent
Bobby
Santos
that
were
against
it.
A
couple
of
weeks
ago
there
was
a
chemical
spill
and
you
have
to
look
at
the
fact
that
it's
a
children's.
R
What
we're
looking
at
and
we're
looking
at
those
kids
I,
don't
have
kids
there,
but
you
know
what
I
consider
them.
My
kids,
it's
the
only
school
surrounded
in
the
United
and
United
in
a
school
district
that
allows
this.
We
can't
have
this.
We
were
told
by
George
some
of
your
staff
people
that
this
was
not
going
to
be
the
final
reading
that
was
gonna
be
approved
at
City
Council.
R
So
the
essence
of
also
when
we
were
looking
at
the
final
readings
they're
talking
about
our
offense,
a
burn,
a
detention
pond.
You
know
this
is
an
injustice
and
you
know
we
all
talk
about
moving
the
waitl
forward.
I
asked
you
board
members
to
stand
today
with
us
and
deny
them.
Let's
move
Lorado
forward
by
doing
the
right
thing
and
the
right
thing,
it
said:
I'm
not
against
business
I'm
all
for
it,
but
let's
do
it
the
proper
way.
You
got
us
to
understand
the
lives
of
those
children.
R
I
want
you
to
guys
just
think
about
it.
Kids,
playing
out
there
close
your
eyes
and
see
these
children
playing
out
there,
a
truck
where
a
chemical
comes
out
and
those
kids
that
are
dying
gasping
for
air
and
then
open
up
your
eyes,
and
it
could
be
your
children,
your
grandchildren.
This
is
what
is
at
stake
here.
R
B
R
We
did
the
mr.
Gomez
and
also
mr.
Kent,
there's
another
property
that
we're
also
fighting
met
and
they
all
came
with
some
concerns
and
at
one
time,
I
think
they
also
came
with
a
condition
that
they
were
going
to
society.
We
can't
get
a
middle
ground
that
they
were
going
to
introduce
an
ordinance
around
the
area
of
the
school
and
alumna
Botha
that
no
hazmat
material
would
be
allowed
and
I
think
we
all
came
to
that
agreement.
If
we
were
forced
to
do
that,
we
came
to
a
common
ground.
R
The
common
ground
was
that
there
was
going
to
be
a
fence,
10-foot
fence
or
a
seven-foot
fans
out
on
what
the
audience
calls
for
green
wreaths.
A
burn
you
know
to
address,
I
I
would
invite
you
people
to
go
there
and
look
at
the
playground,
these
kids
out
a
bunch
of
pallets
trailers
out
there,
the
fumes
of
just
the
of
the
emission
of
the
diesel
this
hazardous
to
those
children.
You
know
and
I
the
fight
that
I
think
it
person
it
is
that
they
not
might
be
my
children
but
I
consider
them.
R
My
children
is
that
we
live
in
America
and
this
is
not
allowed
anywhere
in
the
United
States.
But
I
am
it's
time
that
we
stand
up
and
do
the
right
thing.
It
may
cost
us
money,
but
guess
what
what's
the
value
of
one
child,
one
elderly
retired
person
gasping
for
air?
It's
time
that
we
stand
up
and
do
the
right
thing:
people
we
solve
up
at
the
water
work.
We
got
problems
in
our
city,
but
fighting
amongst
ourselves,
ain't
gonna,
be
the
answer.
It's
time
to
say
we
agree
with
you.
R
We
stand
up
for
the
injustice
that
others
people
did
at
the
time
might
have
been
the
right
thing,
but
today
it's
not
the
right
thing.
We
need
to
stand
together
and
fight
together,
because
it's
us
today
tomorrow
beat
South
Laredo
tomorrow,
be
we
need
to
put
some
type
of
provision
to
protect
us
from
that.
It's
not
about
the
money,
it's
about
the
quality
of
life
that
we
want
to
promote
it
or
Radio
Texas.
B
H
B
K
K
H
My
name
is
Richard,
gamez
I
represent
utility
trailer
cells
and
we
met
a
couple
of
times
and
we
were
all
in
agreement.
We're
gonna
build
a
block
fence
towards
the
school
and
then
on
the
the
other
remaining
signs.
We
plan
to
do
some
kind
of
a
Barney,
berm
berm
and
then
put
some
landscaping
on
top
just
to
let
you
know
we're
we're
we're
company
that
that
sell
empty
trailers.
H
B
B
H
B
H
B
B
I
think
I
mean
I,
think
that
would
you
know
pretty
much.
It
very
clearly
spell
out.
You
know
mr.
Thomas
yours
come
forward
and
integrate
and
mr.
Coston
and-
and
this
is
what
they
came
up
with,
as
you
know,
recommendation
that
would
prefer
that
they
be
black
notes
on
here,
so
that
you
know
none
of
those
are
here.
None
of
you
guys
are
here,
there's
always
a
I'll
paul
bag
to
where
there
is
something
in
writing
that
kind
of
describes.
What
is
gonna
take
place
in
this
particular
right.
B
D
D
E
E
B
D
B
M
M
S
Cool
the
way,
the
way
it
works,
what
it
has
is,
it
has
what's
considered
maximum
allowable
quantities
and
depending
what
you're,
using
whether
it
be
corrosive
flammables
explosives
it'll,
take
into
account
the
type
of
Hazard
and
then
the
quantity
of
it
and
then
from
there.
It's
gonna
tell
you.
If
you
have
X
amount
of
one
point:
one
explosives,
twenty
pounds
you
have
to
have
they'll,
give
you,
let's
say
a
hundred
feet
from
any
inhabitable
inhabitable,
building
from
a
property
line
and
from
a
public
way.
S
S
Oh
yeah,
definitely,
it
would
be,
it
would
be
an
even
considers
inhabitable
mooglies
on
their
own
property,
so
in
other
words
they
put
their
little
like
a
little
I
guess
a
magazine
for
explosives
and
if
it's
asking
for
two
thousand
feet
from
any
public
way
and
erode
any
inhabitable
building
or
any
property
line,
like
I
said,
if
they
don't
have
those
two.
If
it
encroaches
into
the
school,
if
it
encroaches
to
a
building
on
their
property,
then
it
doesn't
get
approved
a.
Q
And
in
this
case
case,
if
I
might
add
like
because
it's
dealing
with
commercial
vehicles,
they'll
also
fall
under
the
USDOT
regulations.
So
if
there
is
ever
a
concern
with
with
the
public,
they
can
also
make
a
report
to
the
Texas
Department
of
Transportation
or
the
USDOT,
and
they
will
do
an
inquiry
on
the
company
itself
and
there
are
hefty
fines
and
those
type
of
violations
too,
so
that
there
are
other
legal
standards
that
protect
the
community.
S
I'm,
like
you
mentioned,
there's
multiple
safety
nets
throughout
the
city
and
if
right
now,
they're
gonna
put
a
like
a
trailer
truck
trailer
cargo
storage-
let's
say
two
three
years
from
now
they
so
we
know
what
we
want
to
store,
flammable,
combustible
liquids
when
the
business
changes
they're
supposed
to
come
to
the
city,
Laredo
and
start
a
new
business
process.
Part
of
that
process
is
gonna.
Ask
them
what
what
the
operation
on
the
premise
is.
What
are
you
storing
out
there?
Well,
then,
they
start
to
have
we're
going
to
start.
Storing,
flammable,
combustible,
okay.
S
Well,
how
much
of
it
are
you
gonna
store,
then,
once
it's
are
telling
us,
we
have
to
make
sure
I
mean
that
they
put.
Let's
say
they
put
a
tank
up
there.
Does
it
have
that
thing
have
to
be
diet?
Does
it
have
to
be
double-walled?
Does
it
have
separation
from
the
property?
There's
there's
a
lot
of
safety
measures
that
are
built
into
the
International
fire
code
to
keep
whatever
that
they're
doing
a
safe
distance
and
properly
protected
from
the
surrounding
buildings.
So
there
are
multiple
safety
nets.
Okay,
thank
you.
Yes,
all
right
can.
K
K
One
and
and
I
don't
think
it's
in
our
jurisdiction
through
up
to
condition
the
approval
see
their
food
is
coming
to
us
without
any
notice
to
the
Bennifer
I
feel
that
we
should,
if
we're
going
to
prove
it,
we
should
have
proved
it
the
way
it
is
brought
to
us,
rather
than
they
create
a
condition
for
the
developer.
That's
my
personal
opinion.
If
we're
going
to
prove
it
I
think
we
should
approve
the
way
it
was
brought
to
us
and
the
way
it
was
it
was
published.
Okay
now
it
was
given
to
the
public
eye.
K
K
B
C
B
Two
three
four
motion
carries
all
right.
The
next
thing
that
we
have
is
consideration
of
the
model
subdivision
rule
compliance
for
the
plight
of
Phoenix
village
by
six,
the
attendant
residential
is
the
ten
acre
tract.
It
is
located
north
of
State,
Highway,
359
and
east
of
Kansas
City
railroad
yard.
The
zoning
for
this
33
lakh
development
is
our
one.
This
track
is
located
in
district
2.
The
proposed
action
is
a
pool.
H
E
Service
also
I'd
like
to,
though
back
up
to
second
and
talk
about
conditions
for
approval.
I.
Think
now
is
a
good
opportunity.
I
think
y'all
split
on
that
when
something's
brought
forward
and
they're
in
compliance
with
the
rules,
adding
additional
conditions
is
not
something
that
the
Commission
has
authority
to
do.
Our
rules
are
written
in
some
places
for
you
to
allow
conditions
for
it
to
be
based
on
conditions
and
then
others
when
they're
complying
with
the
rules,
they're
able
to
move
forward
in
the
process
and
be
able
to
do
so.
E
I
think
you
brought
up
a
good
point
that
we
shouldn't
be
applying
conditions
that
that
an
applicant
did
not
agree
to
and
that
were
not
backed
up
by
the
rules.
However,
would
it
have
hurt
in
this
situation?
No
I,
don't
think
it
would
have,
because
the
applicant
agreed
to
this
condition
and
it
was
voluntary.
Well
any
time
an
applicant
voluntarily
agrees
to
apply
conditions
so,
for
instance,
you
you
would
not
have
been
able
to
require
him
to
build
that
fence.
You
wouldn't
have,
because
we
don't
know
rules
for
you
to
do
that.
E
However,
you
could
have
asked
him.
You
could
have
said
in
this
case.
It
was
already
asked,
but
let's
say
there
wasn't
somebody
that
there
wasn't
an
agreement,
and
you
said
you
know
I
think
there
might
be
a
concern.
Would
you
be
willing?
Could
we
put
in
the
condition
and
if
the
applicant
Longy,
they
could
say
yes
and
so
then
you
could
approve
it
with
that
condition
that
they
alright,
that
they,
they
add
a
note
to
the
puppet.
That's
required
to
do
that.
M
I
think
respectfully
we
all
know,
and
mr.
V
avianna
is
very
experienced
in
this
area.
We
as
a
board
at
least
the
time
that
I've
been
here.
We
know
what
we
can
or
can't
do,
but
we
find
it
more
proper
instead
of
just
rejecting
something,
giving
somebody
the
opportunity
to
amend
it
without
having
to
we
can
we
know
it's
a
thumbs
up
or
a
thumbs
down
situation,
but
rather
than
the
course
and
and
make
them
come
back
later.
We
give
them
the
opportunity
in
a
gentle,
more
sociable
way
saying.
M
But
this
was
one
item
that
I
think
there
was
a
general
disagreement
amongst
the
Commission
because
of
the
sensitivity
and
some
of
us
agreeing
wholeheartedly
with
that
there
shouldn't
be
anything
next
to
that
school,
but
as
a
course
of
action.
Yes,
you're
right,
we
know
we
can
thumbs
up
or
thumbs
down,
but
we've
generally
let
them
do
it
so
that
they
don't
have
to
go
through
the
whole
point
of
being
from
staff.
Understood.
E
That
the
Planning
Commission
does
very
few
that
are
discretionary
when
you're
sending
a
recommendation
to
Council.
Well,
when
you're
acting
is
a
body
of
approval,
you're,
reading
the
rules
and
you're
saying
do
they
comply
or
they
not
comply
with
the
rules
and
I.
Think
it's
a
beaver
state
that
just
just
so
that
everybody
understands
just
just
and.
B
We
appreciate
you
stating
that,
but
this
you
know
when
gentlemen,
that
agree
well
attorney
to
some
other
things,
because
this
was
an
item
that
was
oddly
contested
before
this
commission.
Okay,
all
we're
trying
to
do
is
not
deny
it
see
if
we
can
make
things
work
for
everybody,
and
you
know
by
reducing
things,
to
write
him
as
always
a
good
thing.
You
know
that
the
minimal
approval
for
the
plaid
was
on.
Yes,
it
was,
but
some
things
if
the
other
part
is
an
agreement
to
it,
just
makes
it
a
lot
easier
for
the
future.
B
Yeah
I
mean
we
understand
at
least
I
do
and
at
least
I
think
most
of
the
commissioners
understand
what
you
can
and
cannot
do
in
terms
of,
for
example,
that
there
was
no
representation
here.
You
just
cannot
slap
something
that
is
not
in
the
ordinance
on
this
thing.
I
agree
with
that.
This
was
just
more
like
you
know.
There
was
an
agreement
between
parties
and
stuff,
but
I.
Thank
you
for
pointing
that
out
to
all
of
us,
but
I
think
we're
familiar
with
it.
Thank
you
motion
to
adjourn
washington
turn
and
second.