►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 080521 Part 2 of 2
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 080521 Part 2 of 2
B
A
A
E
C
Rule
that
the
next
project
will
have
to
follow
the
punch
through.
How
are
we
going
to.
F
B
So
in
the
in
the
from
so
from
this
point
forward,
so
we
have
this
master
plan
here
and
then
we
have
the
preliminaries.
That's
in
the
one
of
the
feature
agenda
items.
This
does
go
through
the
one-stop
shop
and
they
will
review
it.
So
it's
not
just
planning
who's.
Also
enforcing
these
items,
as
well
as
the
staff
of
the
one-stop
shop
and.
C
C
D
Development
10
feet
apart
and
they
don't
have
to
connect
here
at
all,
and
then
we
have
a
cell
division
with
only
one
individual,
that's
called
a
hamster,
that's
related,
I
mean
they
can
do
it
and
what
I'm?
What
I'm
asking
is
that
it's
not
something
that's
going
to
be
developed
and
then
eventually
in
10
years,
it's
going
to
get
connected.
I
want
something
that
can
be
connected
right
now
that
we
can
have
the
two
entrances
for
the
safety.
E
G
G
E
E
H
C
And
the
property
of
the
359
is
occupied.
Everything
to
the
you
know
to
the
left.
C
C
C
It's
just
we
can't
it's
never
built.
First,
the
homes
always
have
to
come
before
the
connectivity.
I
I
I
I
B
For
the
record,
the
applicant
is
tls
commercial
properties.
Llc
qr,
adventures,
engineer
of
record
is
about
consulting
llc,
approximately
78.87
acres,
located
east
of
bumble,
aguero
and
south
of
jackson.
Road,
the
zoning
for
those
2012
elements
of
b3,
e4
r1a
r1pg
report
uses
brother
benchmark
commercial,
general
location.
H
E
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
D
H
H
A
I
B
I
Now,
I
guess
the
question
I
have
for
planning
is:
do
you
have
something
from
tech
start
indicating
that
this
is
going
to
be
the
expansion
that
they're
working
on,
so
the
planning
department
doesn't
have
any
notice
right
now
that
this
is
potentially
something
that
they're?
The
only
situation
that
we
have
right
now
is
conversations
we
had
with
textile
correct
indicated
to
you
that
they
were
going
to
white
man.
I
guess
that's
going
to
be
I-69.
Is
that
what
that
is?
Yes
right,
that's
the
yeah!
It's
the
elevation!
I
No,
it's
the
I-69
quarter
that
they're
proposing
for
the
future,
but
again
there's
no
yeah
and
no
time,
no
time
limits
as
to
when,
where
that
is
correct,
what
makes
it
this
is
probably
looking
for
one
correct
yeah,
but
bob
bullock
is
supposed
to
be
expanded
to
make
it
I-69,
but
there's
no
time
frame.
I
I
didn't
see
anything
in
the
npo.
He
has
the
elevations.
F
The
projects
for
2022.
2034.,
he
wasn't.
H
I
I
A
B
H
Much
of
this
subdivision
is
already
developed.
I
Portions
of
that
master
plan
that
needs
to
be
done.
Yes,
okay,
wasn't
there.
D
D
Which
is
unbuildable
and
apparently
it
will
overflow,
and
that
would
create
the
discharge
of
water
through
that
area,
and
I
noticed
that
you're
using
it
as
an
axis,
at
least
that's
what.
H
D
D
I
D
We
I
think
that
needs
to
be
addressed
in
the.
D
And
if
they
allow.
E
D
Permit,
then
that
could
be
doable,
because
you
will
only
develop
that,
based
on
the
approval
of
your
yeah
yeah.
H
H
I
H
D
I
H
D
H
H
D
I
H
H
They
I
have
a
meeting
with
them
on
monday
to
finalize
and
talk
to
them
and
what
they
said
is
we
understand
that
you
have?
You
need
a
second
access
that
that
meets
a
fire
department
standards.
So
we
know
that
we're
gonna
give
you
that
they
didn't
agree
exactly.
They
haven't
agreed
with
the
exact
location,
but.
H
Yes,
like
I
said
it
may
not
be
there,
but
they
said,
and-
and
it
will
be
to
be
honest,
highly
unlikely
that
be
used,
because
you
have
this.
If
something
happens
to
them
the
only
one
in
front
of
you,
they
don't
have
to
deal
with
them,
then
that's
what
that
would
be
used,
but
right
now
italian
guy
usually
happens,
so
they
want
to
have
it
there
and
we're
gonna.
On
monday,
like
I
said,
I'm
gonna
have
a
meeting
with
with
thanks
for
that
tried
to
have
it
before
they
told
me
that
we've
become
to
have.
F
In
if
that
enriches
the
exit,
because
well
they
gotta
have
it.
I
I
All
right
so
yeah,
okay,
any
questions
for
the
engineer
from
anybody
else.
Okay,
so
then
the
issues
are
number
one
number
seven
and
the
comment
on
the
tia.
Okay.
What
are
the
wishes
of
the.
D
I
I
B
Investments
limited
edge:
your
record
is
terrorist.
South
engineering
gabriela's
pe
approximately
five
and
a
half
acres
located
north
of
prison
1472
in
southwest
state
highway.
255
designing
for
this
one
of
our
developments
and
one
of
course,
which
is
industrial
general
location
by
the
columbia
bridge,
aerial.
B
F
Investments
we
agree
to
staff
comments,
however,
not
under
not
completely
from
their
traffic
safety.
Number
one
reads:
how
will
that
commercial
area
develop
we're?
Okay,
with
that
we
have
a
site
plan
or
the
contractor
has
a
type
kind
of
proposed
cycle.
It's
one
lot
of
consisting
of
5.55
acres,
the
one
that's
or
maybe
a
little
gray
on,
which
is
showing
master
plan
of
what
I'm
not
too
sure
masculine
is
one
lot
and
there
aren't
any
that
excited.
Investors
owns
only
those
five
point:
five,
five
acres
yeah
the
adjoining
tracks
are
owned
by
someone
else.
F
F
F
The
other
parts
are
kind
of
well,
I'm
not
too
sure
what
it's
what's
being
requested.
I
did
send
an
email
to
mr
danny
mcgee
and
maggie
castro.
I
I
Does
anybody
else
have
any
questions,
no
questions
for
sure
all
right
for
the
wishes
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
and
delete
contracted
traffic
safety
comment
number
one
issue
all
right:
six
seconds:
we
have
a
second
all
those
who
pay
for
signify
by
saying
aye,
hi,
always
against
emotional
carers.
Thank.
I
B
Commercial,
yes,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record,
the
applicants
provide
your
lp
we're
on
eye
course.
Your
record
is
due
right
engineering,
because
almost
approximately
one
acre
located
north
of
the
piercing
road
and
west
of
san
francisco
parkway,
the
zoning
for
this
chicago
and
three
three
and
a
half
general
location.