►
From YouTube: Plannning and Zoning Commission Meeting 120320
Description
Plannning and Zoning Commission Meeting 120320
B
C
D
C
B
All
right,
I'm
calling
this
meeting
to
order.
The
first
item.
F
B
B
B
I
Yes,
sir,
and
I
want
to
thank
everybody
everyone's
doing
a
great
job
muting
themselves
after
we
speak
that
really
helps
with
the
audio
quality
of
the
meeting.
I
really
appreciate
that
and
yes,
there's
about
a
30-second
lag
so,
but
we
can
also
take
comments
throughout
if
anybody
calls
in
we'll
be
sure
and
there's
there
is
a
public
hearing
for
several
of
the
items
dealing
with
annexation,
so
I'm
sure
we'll
hear
from
the
public.
So
if
you
want,
we
can
move
forward.
B
We
can
move
forward
and
thank
you
first
out
of
the
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
for
the
following
annexation.
Fracks
5a
is
the
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
for
the
voluntary
annexation
and
initial
zoning
of
8g
in
r1a
for
a
track
of
land,
totaling,
247.7
acres,
more
or
less
less
150.43
acres
ag
and
87.27
acres
of
r1a,
as
described
by
the
bounds
known
as
annexation,
track
one.
It's
the
rodriguez
ranch
track
and
it
is
located
east
of
international
boulevard
and
north
of
juan
esquita.
B
I
I
I
Here
is
a
map
showing
the
current
zoning.
It's
r1
and
r1a
are
lower
density,
single
family
zones
and
here's
a
map
of
the
future
land
use
map
we're
working
on
our
future
land
use
map,
as
we've
expressed
to
you
before
right
now,
it's
based
in
in
the
area,
that's
in
the
epj,
it's
fairly
rough,
which
would
be
anticipated,
but
you
can
see
that
this
area
calls
for
a
continued
expansion
of
residential,
and
here
is
the
the
track
that
was
drawn.
I
We
don't
believe
that
that
will
adversely
impact
the
surrounding
labor
inside
the
city
moments
and
here's.
The
proposed
motion
just
want
to
call
attention.
It
is
a
recommendation
to
counsel
regarding
the
the
zoning
of
this.
The
initial
zoning
of
this
proposed
annexation.
I
B
Annotation,
does
anybody
wish
to
comment
on
this?
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Do
we
have
anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
for
or
against
the.
E
Mr
chairman,
we
have
not
received
any
comments
from
the
public
so
far.
J
No
kirby,
I'm
not
I'm
not
able
to
get
a
hold
of
him
he's
not
answering.
It
goes
to
voicemail.
Okay,.
B
K
B
All
right,
and
with
nobody
else
on
the
line
to
comment
on
the
public
hearings,
whether
for
or
against
what
are
the
wishes
of
the
commission.
B
Signify
by
saying
I,
with
none
heard,
motion
carries
thank
you
next
item
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
for
the
voluntary
annexation
and
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
the
track
of
land,
totaling
2.07
acres,
also
known
as
annexation
track
2.
The
cueva
stanley
track
is
located
south
of
the
mines,
road
and
west
of
the
coal
mine
road.
I
Yes,
sir,
the
applicant
is
stanley
investments
and
the
engineer
is:
do
right.
Engineering,
as
you
stated,
it's
a
roughly
two
acre
attractive
land,
okay,
south
of
mines,
road
they're,
proposing
to
do
m1,
which
is
our
light
manufacturing
zone.
We
have
two
manufacturing
zones,
m1
and
m2.
The
m1
is
the
lighter
of
the
two,
and
the
proposed
use
is
industrial.
I
I
B
I
Survey
of
the
property
staff
supports
the
initial
zoning.
It's
in
performance
with
the
future
land
use
map
is
compatible
with
the
surrounding
uses
and
when
you're
ready
here
is
the
proposed
motion
to
recommend
approval
or
denial
of
the
voluntary
annexation
of
the
initial
zoning
with
m1
and
when
you're
ready
for
the
public
hearing.
Here's
the
number
republican
call-in.
B
B
J
Yes,
sir,
we
do
have
ricardo
ramos
on
the
line.
M
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
city,
the
annexation
of
the
track.
B
All
right
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
to
approve
the
annexation
and
the
zoning
is
that
correct.
That's
correct
all
right!
All
those
who
are
not
in
favor
of
the
recommendation
specified
by
saying
that,
with
an
unheard
motion,
carries
thank
you
next
item,
the
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
with
voluntary
annexation
and
initial
zoning
of
r1a
on
a
track
of
land,
totaling,
17.57
acres
known
as
annexation,
track
three
matinees
track,
and
it's
located
north
of
state,
highway,
359
and
east
of
floral
boulevard.
I
The
engineer
is
baywa
consulting
and,
as
you
mentioned,
it's
a
roughly
18-acre
tract
of
land
located
north
of
state
highway
359
pro
zoning,
for
this
is
r1a,
which
is
a
slightly
it's
a
it's
still.
A
lower
density,
single
family
detached
residential
zone,
but
a
little
higher
density
than
our
lower
single
family
zones
proposed
used.
Residential
here
is
an
aerial
view
showing
it's
off
359
on
the
east
side
of
the
city.
I
Here's
an
aerial
view
showing
the
the
about.
I
just
want
to
call
attention
to
it.
A
little
wider
zoom
out.
You
can
see
that
this
is
within
proximity
of
the
city's
landfill,
which
is
that
light,
which
you
can
see
on
the
aerial
the
the
dirt
tracks
to
the
right.
I
The
staff
recommendation
does
not
support
the
initial
zoning,
we're
not
against
the
annexation
of
this
land,
but
we
do
not
support
the
initial
zoning.
We've
communicated
that
with
the
the
applicant
and
they're
discussing
that
with
their
client,
but
because
it's
located
in
1600
feet
of
the
landfill,
we
do
not
feel
that
that
would
be
a
good
location
for
residential.
I
Here's
the
proposed
motion,
a
motion
to
recommend
approval
or
denial
and
when
you're
ready,
we
have,
we
can
open
up
for
public
hearing
and
we
do
have
the
applicant
on
the
phone
when
you're
ready.
B
All
right,
I
guess
let's
listen
to
the
applicant
first
and
then
we'll
take
questions
from
the
commissioner.
D
The
mr
chairman,
commissioners
and
staff:
we
feel
that
they
there
are
one
day
supporters
you
know
on
the
south.
You
have
have
one
on
the
on
the
east,
even
though
it's
undeveloped,
we
have
a
residences
there
and
then
on
the
on
the
west.
We
have
the
agricultural
right
after
the
agriculture
there's
our
one
and
then
the
the
part
that
is
not
alex.
Yet
it
also
has
residences
there.
C
Our
questions,
mr
sherman,
mr
castillo,
mr
castillo,
if
you
notice,
clearly
made
a
common
as
to
the
distance
between
the
poles
development
in
the
the
landfill.
C
C
I
know
that
this
would
be
actually
it's
not
the
project
of
planning
it,
but
I
think
it's
a
good
question:
bring
it
out
right
now,
because
kirby
brought
it
up
now.
Has
any
study
been
done?
Are
you
aware
of
any
study
that
is
in
that
area
that
might
give
you
a
heads
up
as
to
what
the
community
might
be
exposed
once
you
do
development
and
they're
they're
dying
to
live.
J
Yes,
commissioner,
was
referring
to,
if
you
know
of
any
study
and
what
would
be
the
impact
to
the
surrounding
areas.
D
I
know
eventually
the
landfill
is
moving,
but
I
don't
know
if
they
have
done
a
study
and
how
they
surrounding.
Unfortunately,
I
know
that
I
know
either.
C
Let
me
let
me
go
ahead
and
clarify
that,
mr
castillo,
can
you
hear
me.
C
So
that
being
said,
if
you're
not
aware
of
any
studies,
then
shouldn't
we
have
a
study.
Mr
sherman,
before
we
do
the
zoning
I
mean
the
annexation
will
be
fine.
It's
just
that
we
might
need
to
bring
a
an
industrial
zoning
with
the
annexation
and
then
when
they
have
a
study,
they
can
bring
it
up
before
us
and
then
we
can
decide
if
it's
suitable
for
us
to
approve
an
r1a.
M
Kirby
the
1600
feet
from
the
from
the
the
site:
what's
the
minimum
distance,
that
is,
is
there
a
minimum
distance
requirement
and
if
good,
on
that
first
question,
I
have.
I
There
is
not
a
minimum
distance
requirement,
but
this
is
something
that
has
been
thought
through.
That's
why
the
city
is
designated
on
the
future
land
use
map
this
area
as
commercial
and
industrial,
because
it
it
it
doesn't
want
to
see
residential.
There
doesn't
think
it
would
be
good,
so
the
city
already
had
that
foresight
and
that's
why
it's
designated
not
residential
on
the
future.
I
L
L
It
also
creates
a
liquid
that
leachates
into
the
creek's
surrounding
area.
And
if
and
if
you
remember,
when
we
built
that
landfill,
we
had
an
obligation
to
shield
the
property
on
the
herd
side
where
they
developed
that
industrial
park.
I
don't
believe
the
same
requirement
was
there
because
mr
hurd
didn't
have
an
interest
on
these
on
the
west
side
and
so
that
that
track
of
land
is
unprotected.
L
So
if
you
allow
the
r1a
to
occur,
then
at
some
point
in
the
future,
the
people
who
would
buy
those
tracks
would
then
approach
the
city
and
have
a
requirement
to
the
city
that
they
somehow
be
shielded
from
all
this
hills
that
are
there.
Those
hills
are
trash,
yeah
and
they're,
and
they're
constantly
disintegrating
and
and
they're
constantly
creating
methane
gas.
L
B
But
you
have
to
write
larry
about
the
leaking
of
any
decomposition
liquids
yeah.
I
remember
the
methane
gas
issue
we
did
have.
There
might
be
more
monitoring
wells.
I
don't
know
now.
Yeah.
B
L
J
B
Anybody
on
on
city
staff
from
solid
ways
kirby,
not
no!
We
don't
because
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
questions
there,
that
the
commission
has
that
we
kind
of
need
some
answers
too,
but
larry's
correct
when
we
purchased
that
piece
of
property
from
herd
there
was
some
stipulations
on
there
about.
B
You
know
possible
leaching
into
the
soil
next
door,
which
was
really
north
on
that
landfill.
B
I
Commissioner,
can
I
just
give
you
a
couple
options
here?
Well,
yeah,
really
they
would
be
options
for
the
applicant.
This
is
not
one
where
you
could
pause
it.
It
is
going
to
move
forward
to
the
city
council.
You
could
ask
the
applicant
if
they
want.
If
they
want
a
positive
recommendation
from
planning
commission,
they
could
bring
this
back
in
the
annexation
cycle,
the
deadline
that
is
in
january
for
that
annexation
cycle.
But
these
questions
that
you're
asking
now
these
are
things
that
the
applicant
can
prepare
to
answer
for
city
council.
I
B
C
I
may
mr
sherman
real
quick.
I
don't
see
a
reason
to
delay
the
voluntary
annexation,
provided
that
the
applicant
might
agree
to
bring
the
annexation
on
an
industrial
with
an
m1,
maybe,
and
that
can
be
changed
in
the
future
once
he
has
a
study
and-
and
it
shows
that
that
the
development
will
be
appropriate
for
the
community
or
whoever
the
residents
are
included.
But
I
feel
that
if,
if
we
can,
we
can
approve
it
going
with
an
m1
which
was
initially
created
for
that
area.
C
I
don't
see
a
reason
to
to
stop
the
annexation
if
the
the
owner
decides
voluntarily
to
to
change
it
right
now
to
an
m1,
and
then
we
can
probably
proceed
with
the
voluntary
annexation
or
probably
the
the
recommendation
to
be
the
the
to
approve
the
voluntary
annexation
in
accordance
to
the
to
the
current
zoning
provided
by
the
by
the
by
the
by
the
by
the
city
of
radio.
For
that
particular
shade.
B
H
D
What
I
wanted
to
say
is
probably
just
to
we
if
we
could
change
it
to
act,
so
it
is
same
as
the
track
next
next
to
it
to
the
way
that
way,
I
mean
we
really
cannot
change
anything
until
we
explore
it
and
we
go
more
in
depth
when
we
resonate
later
on,
but
we
will
be
agreeable
for
that
to
get
there,
you
know
to
get
it
to
act,
to
agricultural
fashion,
initial
zoning
and
then
do
our
deal
against
before
we.
B
I
think
right
now
we
need
kirby.
You're
gonna
have
to
help
us
out
on
this,
because
I
remember
that
most
of
the
zoning
cases
going
forward
are
not
eggs.
Okay.
Now
I
it
probably
is
permissible,
but
I'm
gonna
seek
your
guidance
on
that.
I
Yeah,
that's
going
to
be
the
case
after
this
cycle,
starting
every
cycle
after
this
by
ordinance,
the
applicants
won't
be
able
to
ask
for
ag
and
that
won't
be
a
permitted
zone
for
annexation,
but
for.
I
I
can
provide
just
a
little
more
insight
here.
What
what
you
would
be
well,
I
guess
you
can
provide
any
recommendation.
You
want,
but
really
it's
it's,
whether
you're,
positive
or
negative,
in
support
of
this
and
ultimately
city
council
has
that
discretion
to
decide
whether
or
not
to
do
with
it.
But
sorry,
mr
sherman.
C
If
I
may,
I
would
recommend
to
approve
to
city
council
the
voluntary
annexation
of
track
number
three
martinez
track
with
the
initial
zoning
of
8g.
C
That
would
be
my
my
motion.
B
H
D
B
D
D
And
I
could
measure
it,
but
I
think
he's
he's
around
yeah
like
1300
feet.
D
B
Okay,
oscar,
I
think
you
were
willing.
I
think
the
commission
seems
to
feel
comfortable
with
an
a.g
that
way
that
gives
you
some
study
time
in
the
future.
When
you
change
the
zoning
that
you've
crossed
all
your
dots,
I
mean,
and
you
crossed
all
your
teams
and
dotted
all
your
eyes,
especially
with
with
the
landfill
close
by,
but
at
least
this
way
we
can
go
forth,
I
mean,
or
we
can
go
for
it,
the
way
you
have
it
as
r1a
and
see
what
the
commission
wants
to
do
with
it.
I
The
commissioner
was
stating
that
you've
got
two
options
you
can
accept.
Well,
you
have
more
than
two
options,
but
he's
saying
how
do
you
feel
about
accepting
their
recommendation
of
ag
and
moving
forward
with
that?
Or
would
you
like
to
ask
the
commission
whether
or
not
they
will
make
a
motion
on
the
r1a?
In
other
words,
you
don't
want
to
change
it.
You
want
to
move
forward
with
the
r1a
and
you
want
either
a
thumbs
up
or
a
thumbs
down.
Is
that
what
you
prefer.
B
C
Yes,
I
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion
to
recommend
the
approval
to
the
city
of
council.
Monetary
and
exception
attract
three
martinez
track
with
an
initial
sounding
of
aj,
all
right.
L
Discussion,
yes,
sir,
go
ahead,
you
know,
you
know
we're
we're
creating
a
box
here
where
we're
going
to
box
the
city
in
the
landfill,
even
if
it
gets
moved
it's
going
to
be
active
for
the
next
20
or
30
years.
You
have
the
same
situations
in
different
parts
of
town.
You
have
the
dickinson
track
over
in
century
city.
You
have
the
track
of
land.
That
was
the
landfill
where
bridge
of
the
americas
was
built.
We
ended
up
having
to
mitigate
the
methane
in
that
area
because
of
how
it
was
developed.
L
You
have
the
other
landfill,
that's
on
mines,
road
off
of
fletcher
lane,
which
has
also
been
unable
to
develop
and
we're
boxing
in
the
landfill,
and
you
have
this
huge
landfill
that
you
have
almost
mountains
of
trash
that
have
been
deposited
there
for
the
last
20
or
30
years,
and
we're
boxing
in
that
landfill
with
residential
areas
and
with
future
speculation
that
it's
going
to
be
safe
for
these
people.
I
just
don't
get
it.
A
A
So
the
land
they're
only
going
for
ag
zoning,
but
once
they
do
that
that,
then
what
what
happens
after
that,
because
I
am
I'm
a
little-
I'm
not
sure
whether
we
should
we
have
a
positive
recommendation
or
a
negative,
but
to
commissioner
devalina's
point.
It
is
very
risky.
A
B
B
Call
you
go
ahead
and
start
on
joey
against
you're
against
emotion.
Yes,.
N
B
All
right
next
one
is.
B
B
All
right,
okay,
see
the
three
okay,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
and
go
to
any
commotion.
N
B
C
I
B
B
That
recommendation
to
the
city
council
will
be
to
deny
based
on
staff
recommendations.
B
Of
is:
is
voluntary
annexation,
initial
zoning
of
b1
on
a
track
of
land,
totaling,
17.29
acres
known
as
annexation
track
five,
this
nuclear
farm
track
located
south
of
my
road
and
north
of
phelps
road.
B
I'm
sorry,
you
know
what
that's
not
the
correct
one.
Let
me
I
missed
one
just
second
intervention
that
we
have
here
is
only
hearing
the
recommendation
of
volunteer
annexation,
an
initial
joint
of
m1
on
the
track
of
landfill
and
2.62
acres,
more
or
less,
with
fibrous
recent
bounds
and
known
as
annexation
track
for
the
mario
palos
versace,
and
this
is
located
east
of
my
road
at
them.
1472
and
southwest
of
iowa
drive
all
right.
B
I
Applicant
is
mario
carsa
engineer
daniel
gomez,
and
you
already
gave
us
an
overview
of
the
property
and
location
they're.
Proposing
m1,
which
is
our
light
manufacturing
district
and
the
proposed
use
is
industrial.
Here's,
the
general
area
on
the
northwest
side
of
town
just
north
of
mines.
Road
here
is
an
aerial
view
showing
the
proposed
property
in
red
here
is
a
view
of
the
zoning
it's
adjacent
to
industrial,
and
it's
in
you
can
see
the
pinto
vaya
industrial
park
to
the
north
future
land
use
map
designates
this
area
is
light
residential
and
here's
a
survey.
I
This
is
land
that
will
be
annexed
and
used
as
a
as
public
right-of-way
as
a
road
staff
supports
the
zoning
it's
in
conformance
with
the
future
land
use
and
it's
compatible
with
the
surrounding
uses
and
the
need
for
the
annexation.
It
makes
sense
that
they
can
have
those
that
the
access
they
need
for
the
industrial
properties
and
here's
the
proposed
motion
and
when
you're
ready
a
number
for
the
public
to
call
in
or
public
hearing.
I
B
E
Absolutely
this
is
a
a
public
roadway
that
is
adjacent
to
some
tracks
that
are
being
currently
developed,
and
so
there
are
some
questions
or
concerns
that
came
up
with
the
utilities
department
and
need
to
bring
in
this
parcel
of
land
into
the
city
for
maintenance
purposes.
B
But
will
it
continue
to
be,
I
guess,
an
active
roadway.
E
Yes,
sir,
it
will
continue
to
be
an
active
roadway
under
the
city's
maintenance,
correct.
B
B
I
Yeah,
this
roadway
will
service
the
properties
to
the
south.
If
you
look
on
this,
we're
looking
at
lots
11
through
19
in
the
puta
valley
industrial
park
and
to
be
able
to
be
planted
and
to
be
serviced
that
needs
to
be
a
road,
that's
in
the
city
limits
and
that
needs
to
be
maintained
with
a
certain
requirement,
and
so
it
has
to
be
brought
into
the
city
limit
story.
To
do
that.
L
I
B
B
B
C
Make
a
moisture
to
approve,
in
accordance
to
the
recommendations
of
the
steps.
B
B
I
I
The
location
is
just
south
of
mines,
road
between
the
between
mines,
road
and
the
rio
and
the
northwest
side
of
the
city.
Here's
a
view,
an
aerial
view
of
the
property,
here's
a
view
showing
the
zoning
you
can
see,
the
yellow
is
r1
and
to
the
west
of
that
is
b3
the
rest
of
it
is
this
property?
That's
not
in
the
city
limits.
I
The
applicant
is
intending
to
do
primarily
residential,
which
they're
permitted
to
do
in
the
in
the
b1
zone.
The
commercial
zones
also
allow
for
you
to
do
residential,
so
here
they
they
haven't
gotten
extremely
descriptive,
but
they
want
to
do
something
that
would
allow
them
to
be
more
creative
in
their
mix
of
uses
and
having
a
b1.
Would
we
don't
feel
it's
out
of
place,
because
this
b1
would
be
light
commercial?
It
wouldn't
be
anything
intense
commercial
that
wouldn't
mix
with
the
with
the
future
land
use
recommendation
of
this
area's
residential.
I
I
K
All
right
good
evening,
mr
chairman
members
of
the
commission,
frankenstein
with
sheriff
engineering,
we
are
in
concurrence
with
staff's
recommendations.
I
don't
know
if
any
of
the
commission
has
questions
that
I
can
assist
with.
C
Just
a
real,
quick
one,
mr
sherman,
this
is
commissioner
dominguez
hi,
mr
estrada
be
one,
are
you
is
the
propose
is
like
a
multi-family
like
a
complex,
a
residential
conflict.
Is
that
what
they
have
in
mind.
K
The
initial
thought
was
to
be
able
to
allow
some
some,
I
guess,
some
sort
of
unique
development
in
the
area
they
are
in
the
process
of
creating
a
layout.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
we
may
end
up
having
to
re-zone
further
down
for
whatever
residential
takes
place
there,
but
initially
we
just
the
the
client
wanted
to
have
the
b1
zoning
to
be
able
to
to
be
able
to
create
a
layout
that
that
might
be
beneficial
for
the
area
around.
The
golf
course.
B
B
Motion
carries
the
next
item
is
the
review
and
reconsideration
of
its
unconscious
division
master
plan
the
intended
residential.
The
purpose
of
this
review
is
to
match
revised
plan
of
sentence
of
pbs
state
emphasis,
all
right.
E
Yes,
mr
chairman,
for
the
overview
of
the
applicant,
the
secco
holdings,
llc
engineer
of
record
is
due
right:
engineering,
approximately
53
and
a
half
acres
southeast
of
us,
59
and
south
of
casa
del
sol.
The
zoning
for
the
stone
is
r1a
and
r1mh.
The
proposal
is
the
residential.
The
pros
number
lots
457.
E
If
I
made
mr
chairman,
we
recently
had
the
santa
celia
states
which
had
come
in
over
the
summer
and
were
trying
to
request
a
variance
which
was
not
granted
by
the
planning
commission.
So
they
did
work
with
the
traffic
department
for
a
revised
design.
So
it
did
come
back
to
the
commission
back
on
october
15th
with
a
revised
design
which
was
approved
by
the
commission.
So
the
engineer
wants
to
just
clean
it
up
to
make
sure
that
the
master
plan
is
matching
the
approval
from
the
commission.
That
is
all
okay.
B
All
right
yeah,
I
remember
that
the
traffic
situation
there-
okay,
sorry,
all
right!
Thank
you
all
right.
What
are
the
wishes
of
the
commissioners?
Does
anybody
in
the
commission
have
any
other
questions.
C
B
E
Yes,
sir,
yes,
mr
chairman,
for
the
record,
the
applicant
is
arms,
limited
and
the
owner
is
shashi.
Vaswani
manager,
the
engineer
of
record
of
surfing
engineering
company,
approximately
4.4
acres
located
south
of
del
mar
boulevard
and
west
of
country
club
drive.
The
current
zoning
is
r2,
the
proposed
use
is
a
residential,
and
the
proposed
number
of
lots
is
28.,
general
location,
aerial
view
street
view.
E
The
proposed
plaque
part
as
planted
the
proposed
plan,
and
we
did
want
to
highlight,
make
some
highlights
here.
We
did
coordinate
with
the
engineer
after
the
posting
of
the
packet
in
review
of
the
request
for
the
variants
and
they
did
provide
to
us
and
highlight
the
tracks
that
they
would
be
requesting,
a
variance
for
which
are
here
in
yellow.
I
And
so
we
are
no
longer
recommending
denial
and
the
variance
we
are
recommending
approval,
but
do
know
that
it
requires
two-thirds,
though
all
right,
which
would
be
out
of
the
seven
that
are
here.
It
would
require
five.
E
E
E
C
C
E
Yes,
mr
chairman,
the
applicant
is
jmlg
holdings.
Engineer
of
record
is
called
engineering
and
surveying
approximately
five
acres
located
east
of
cuatro
vietnam,
south
of
state
highway
59.
The
zoning
is
ag
b4
and
r1a,
and
the
proposed
used
city
right
away
is
one
lot.
General
location,
aerial
view
street
view
and
the
proposed
plat
and
the
proposed
motion.